University Observer Volume XVIII - Issue 6

Page 1

niversity U bserver O

the

v o l u m e

x v i i i

·

i s s u e

Editorial Ivan Yates and Prof. Pat O’Connor on educational reform & universities’ glass ceiling

v I

·

w w w. u n i v e r s i t y o b s e r v e r . i e

Features Observer Survey:

What students really think of societies

Siptu object to privatisation of Main Restaurant by Katie Hughes · News Editor

UCD recently announced that the Main Restaurant on campus was to be put out for tender. This statement came following the licensing rights to the majority of catering outlets on campus being given to Kylemore Services Group after a tendering process took place over the summer. According to an email sent out by the UCD SIPTU Section Committee, “the announcement was made with scant regard to the loyalty and commitment that staff displayed over the years.” However, a University spokesperson stated that, “following a tender process, contract caterers will be appointed to operate the main catering services at UCD. In this regard, UCD continues to comply with the Croke Park Agreement in the ongoing consultation with SIPTU as the representative trade union including confirmation that the employment terms and conditions of all existing permanent staff will be retained following the award of the tender.” SIPTU is demanding that the restaurant be retained by UCD in order to bring “an end to privatisation”, that full accountability be held for “managerial decisions which led to difficulties” and for “full transparency about the accounts of the restaurant” with an independent audit assessment taking place. According to SIPTU, UCD appeared before the Labour Relations Committee on November 19th, 2009 and agreed to a trial period of two years to see how the restaurant performed, with

OTWO

an agreement put in place stating that “at the end of this two year period the situation will be reviewed by management: if there has not been a significant revenue improvement at that stage it is accepted that management will revert to its original proposal to appoint an outsourced catering manager.” SIPTU stated that the deficit of the restaurant was €470,000 in 2009, €320,000 after the following year and €70,000 in the financial year just finished. SIPTU claims that the deficit would have been even lower had “very poor management decisions not taken place”, the results of which included “a loss of €70,000 [arising] from moving the Sandwich Bar upstairs … a ten year contract was awarded to Britvic which caused an immediate increase in cost

price – and a further loss of revenue … money from a private donation was used to create a private dining room – but this was then ripped out a few years later … costs for electricity and contract cleaning appear to be apportioned to the restaurant in an unfair way.” SIPTU maintain that UCD have ignored “significant improvements that have taken place in the restaurant … if UCD management can break an agreement and start privatising parts of the college, a precedent will have been set for all staff. We are, therefore, not willing to accept this situation and shall soon be calling a general meeting of all staff to discuss how we respond to this and other issues. We will not tolerate a situation where the hard work and loyalty of Union members is thrown back in our face.”

Photographer: David Nowak

SnowPatrol Talks to

Photographer: David Nowak by Kate Rothwell · deputy Editor

The UCD Athletics Track was officially closed as of Monday 21st November. UCD Athletics Club Captain, Richard Owens, was told of the track’s imminent closure shortly before an email was sent by Vice President for Students, Martin Butler, to students and staff informing them of the end of the “operational life” of the facility due to health and safety concerns. Butler described the poor condition of the track as the reason for its closure; “as the surface is badly worn and becomes slippy when wet, it should be closed to all users.” However, Owen maintains that until “diggers and bulldozers moved in” the following morning, it was still usable. “It wasn’t great, it was the oldest track in Ireland, but it was still in perfectly usable condition … We know there are plans for a new track, which is great, but we were perfectly happy with what we had.” Owens explained how the closure of the track will affect not only the 256 members of the Club, but five local schools, a running club, and members of the public. An alternative location must also now be found for the traditional Belfield staging of national charity event the GOAL mile. Students affected by the closure have been involved in a campaign to ‘save’ the track since the announcement was made. The campaign has so far included an “emergency meeting” between the Athletics Club, Sports Officer Paddy Guiney, and Students’ Union Campaigns and Communications Officer, Brendan Lacey, as well as a “fun run” around campus. A written petition reached over three thousand signatures last week, and an assembly meeting, held in conjunction with LawSoc, was due to take place on Monday 28th November.

UCD Athletics Club demand apology for closed running track Numerous political and sporting personalities have voiced their support for the campaign, including TDs Olivia Mitchell and Micheál Martin, and athletes such as Sonia O’Sullivan, Paula Radcliffe and David Gillick. Guiney stated that the late notice students were given regarding the closure was the impetus behind the campaign, and that they were seeking “an apology for the way the Athletics Club were treated” and wished to see details of the track removed from the UCD prospectus and website: “we don’t want it advertised because it is not there.” Director of Sport Brian Mullins acknowledged that the closure was a “shock and a very big disappointment” for students and explained that shortterm alternatives including “not only synthetic surfaces on campus and grass areas but also options like the Irishtown track” were being explored. Butler expressed the intention of the University “to provide an alternative facility on campus in the future, subject to funding becoming available.” Mullins stated that the “preferred location for a replacement would be in Richview.” Both he and Owens expressed hope that funding for a new track might be obtained from the Sports Capital Programme, which having been suspended for the past three years is due to be reintroduced by the current government in 2012, with a budget of €30 million. Should funding become available, Owens emphasised that the Athletics Club would strive to raise a portion of the required sum themselves. “The exact figure UCD Sport has quoted us is €1.6 million for a new track, so … we think it’s only fair that the club would have to raise €100,000 to €150,000 and then whatever else, to make up the rest of the track.”

Students’ Union to abolish loyalty card scheme by Katie Hughes · News Editor

The Students’ Union have made the decision to withdraw their loyalty card service, which was put in place under last year’s sabbatical team, due to their current financial situation. SU President Pat de Brún stated that he was attempting to make the cuts to avoid having to reduce funding to frontline services that would have a greater impact on students, “we’re looking for other areas where we can save money; the loyalty card is one area that sprang

to my mind because it costs us in the region of €12,000 a year for upkeep and maintenance.” Following approval from the Union’s Executive Committee, de Brún contacted the company providing the service, 20-20 Insights, in an effort to terminate their contract. “It’s kind of complicated because it’s a three-year agreement that we’re only a year and a half through. It is kind of an unusual situation that we’re in and finances are very tight. I’m hoping that we can reach some kind of an agreement whereby we can leave early.”

De Brún cites the introduction of the U-Card system on campus as further reason to terminate the loyalty card scheme, “with the roll-out of the U-Card on campus, its relevance comes into question and I just don’t think that the cost is justifiable in the light of the U-Card starting … I think [the loyalty card] was a great idea, but now that the U-Card has come on board across campus, potentially the SU shops could just be involved with that as well but that’s a bit further down the line … the option is likely there that we could join that sys-

tem and it wouldn’t cost us anything.” The original contract involved a set-up cost last year as, according to de Brún, the loyalty card scheme “was involved with the whole till system of the shops … there’s a lot of software involved and there’s a lot of upkeep with that software, the whole system, the administration of it through our website, that has a cost with it per year.” De Brún describes the sign-up for the initiative last year as “reasonable”, with approximately 6,000 students registering to the system, though he ad-

mits that the number of students using the scheme did not reflect the number that signed up, “people that use it regularly is a lot lower, opportunities for development of it didn’t quite materialise, in that I would have liked to have put drinks tokens on it, I would have like to have put food deals on it, but for a variety of technical reasons some of that wasn’t possible. That’s where I saw the real value of the loyalty card as opposed to just an accumulation of one cent back for every euro spent, which is not a great return.”


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.
University Observer Volume XVIII - Issue 6 by The University Observer - Issuu