The University Observer: Volume XVI, Issue 11

Page 1

SPORT

UCD SECURE FIRST HOME WIN OF THE SEASON BACK PAGE

Observer Digest NEWS

Second fire in Science PAGE 3

FEATURES PAGE 13

30th March 2010

ArtsSoc and B&L fine halved BRIDGET FITZSIMONS

The Arts Society (ArtsSoc) and Business and Legal (B&L) Society have had their fine of €5,000, issued by the Societies Recognition Committee halved to €2,500. The fine was originally handed down for posters for the event ‘The Virgin Ball’ which were considered to be “insidious and dangerous” to students by the committee. Chairman of the Societies Council, Stephen Whelan, said that the fine had been reduced in recognition of an apology issued by the Auditor of ArtsSoc, Niamh Kiely, and the Auditor of the B&L Society, Aoife McGuinness, who had “understood, in hindsight, that the posters were offensive and that perhaps they hadn’t given them enough consideration in the first place.” Considering an appeal from the societies to rescind the find entirely, Recognition Committee found that the societies’ apology was not sufficient in itself to merit a complete dismissal of the fine. “The appeal didn’t make any substantial changes to the last committee meeting,” Whelan said, explaining that “the committee decided that the appeal that they had made didn’t change any of the original findings of the first sitting, so decided to uphold their views on the poster.” He also said that the auditors’ quick response to the request of the UCD Societies Officer, Richard Butler, that they remove the offending posters was also considered by the committee, which decided that “the fine was excessive and decided to make it a little more, as they saw it, lenient.” The posters in question were distributed around campus advertising The Virgin Ball, an event that the two societies were running together during the first week of Semester One. The poster advertised the event by encouraging attendants to “lose Continued on P4>>

30th March 2010 ON THIS DAY IN HISTORY...

1867 US Secretary of State William H. Seward purchases Alaska from the Russians for $7.2 million

ObserverIssue11.indd 1

HEAD TO HEAD: ABORTIONPAGE 6

AARON JOHNSON IS KICK-ASS

INSIDE

Observer

VOLUME XVI ISSUE 11

PAGES 18 & 19

SUPPLEMENT

The University

UCD Flashmobs SCIENCE & HEALTH Sci-fact or Sci-fi: Perpetual Motion

COMMENT

NE QUID FALSE DICERE AUDEAT NE QUID VERI NON AUDEAT

IRELAND’S AWARD-WINNING STUDENT NEWSPAPER

UCDSU refuse to back Ó Súilleabháin for USI KATIE HUGHES AND SIMON CANTWELL

U

CD Students’ Union Education Officer Donnacha Ó Súilleabháin has withdrawn his candidacy for the position of Union of Students in Ireland (USI) Education Officer, after a UCDSU Council meeting mandated UCD reps to vote against him at this week’s USI elections. The move follows allegations made against Ó Súilleabháin’s performance as Education Officer this year, and as Chair of the Science Day organising committee last year. The USI elections take place at the organisation’s Annual Congress, which takes place this week in Ballinasloe, Co. Galway. At the time of going to print, however, it was unclear whether Ó Súilleabháin’s withdrawl had been formally recognised by USI’s Elections Committee. UCDSU decided to oppose Ó Súilleabháin’s candidacy at its special USI Hustings meeting of SU Council last Tuesday, which saw past, present and future SU sabbatical officers questioning Ó Súilleabháin’s capabilities as an officer at a national level. In a private ballot of Council members, 58 members expressed their desire to vote ‘re-open nominations’ (RON) for the USI position, while just seven wanted UCD’s Congress delegates to vote in Ó Súilleabháin’s favour. Former UCDSU President and current USI Irish Language officer, Aodhán Ó Deá, condemned Ó Súilleabháin’s lack of initiative in dealing with promises made in his election manifesto last year, including a pledge to hold late clinics at

Irish rugby star Luke Fitzgerald is swarmed by autograph hunters on his way through campus last week Photo Killian Woods least once a week, keepping an online calendar through which appointments could be made, and guaranteeing to stop cutbacks in library hours. UCDSU Welfare Officer, Scott Ahearn, raised issue against Ó Súilleabháin’s ongoing refusal to speak to SU Campaigns

& Communications Vice-President, Paddy Ryan, who stated that he too could not support the candidacy, adding that “there are better candidates out there.” Meanwhile, Ó Súilleabháin’s successor as SU Education Officer, James Williamson, questioned whether Ó Súilleabháin had

the ability to communicate at a national level, to all SU Education Officers in the country, when “he was incapable of organising a Science Day committee of twenty.” Ó Súilleabháin asserted that he had fulContinued on P4>>

Coca-Cola back in SU shops MATTHEW JONES

UCD Students’ Union’s longstanding boycott of Coca-Cola products has been lifted after students voted to rescind the boycott. 52 per cent of students voted to rescind the 2003 embargo, while the No side earned the support of 48 per cent of voters. In the aftermath of the referendum the agent for the No side, Aideen Carberry, expressed her confidence that that a large majority of the students would vote in favour of reintroducing the boycott if the matter was to be put to a student vote again. Carberry remarked how some students she had spoken to said they would have voted No if they had had more details about the reasons for the ban, and com-

mented that “there’s definitely room for a campaign here for next year.” The prevailing opinion of the students, however, was to re-introduce the sale of Coca-Cola products, with a majority believing that the choice of whether or not to purchase Coke should be left to individual students. A large Facebook campaign was initiated to revoke the boycott, with the founders of the page claiming that a minority of students felt the urge to impose the boycott upon the entire student population. In the course of the referendum, the No campaign was forced to remove all of its posters from the campus after it was found to have breached the Union’s election campaigns policy. Carberry conceded that her campaign had breached the rules but believed the punishment

to be unfair, and suggested that a lighter fine – suggesting the removal of half of her materials – would have been more appropriate. Carberry also spoke of her dissatisfaction at the SU’s refusal to run an information campaign on the referendum, despite having made earlier assurances that impartial details would be offered. The boycott was introduced in 2003 after Coca-Cola became embroiled in a legal case over its alleged involvement in paramilitary murders at two of its bottling plants in Colombia. The United Steelworkers Union and the International Labour Rights Fund, along with the Colombian trade union SINALTRAINAL, lodged the case with the US Federal Court in July 2001. However, the court decreed that Coca-Cola was not in

breach of human rights in September of 2006, and in August 2009 the US Court of Appeals affirmed the Federal Court’s dismissal of the legal case. UCD was the first institution in the world to put such a boycott in place and several other institutions, including the SU at Trinity College Dublin and the National Union of Students in the United Kingdom, have since followed suit. Trinity’s boycott was rescinded after a referendum there last year. With this decision, the Students’ Union are now free to sell Coca-Cola products including Fanta, Sprite and Lilt, and are allowed to seek sponsorship from the Coca-Cola Company. Coca-Cola was already available in several of the SU shops as The University Observer went to print.

29/03/2010 07:41


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.