VOL. XXV, Issue 6, UO

Page 1

News

Comment

Gaeilge

Sports

Underfunded Irish universities are “systems in danger”

H2H: Religious and political societies Nathan Young & Michael Regan

Piain i mo ghuta – ca bhfuil an fada?

Club Focus: Sepak Takraw on the rise

Hugh Mac Giolla Chearra P15

Rory Clarke P19

Dylan O’Neill P3

VOL. XXV, ISSUE 6

P7

THE UNIVERSITY

OBSERVER 19th February 2019

‘I think that somebody has pissed him off’ - Union bogged down by endemic communication issues Wheelchair user had to be carried around and stay in a hotel on their own due to botched organisation of Union’s bonding trip. Pictured: The “It Stops Now” mural in UCD that was supposed to be feature in a video for SHAG Week which UCDSU failed to organise despite the decision to postpone it being taken at an Executive meeting in November

Brían Donnelly EDITOR Persistent examples of poor communication within UCD Students’ Union have been causing discontent, with members of the Union’s Executive noting that the recent “lack of communication makes the union look very bad”, minutes from the most recent meeting of the Union Executive show. Discussions held at the sixth meeting of the Union’s Executive concerned the need to focus on improving the reputational damage of the Union and addressed a cancelled debate which would have seen candidates for the Irish presidency address students in UCD in anticipation of the 2018 presidential election. The event had initially been promised at Union Council in early October. The Union Executive is responsible for making decisions on the day-to-day operation of the Union and is made up of the Sabbatical Officers, the College Officers and the Irish Language Officer. The group heard that a meeting, to be chaired by a “neutral third party”, would be held to resolve persistent communication issues arising between members of the Executive and Campaign Coordinators. A “UCDSU Communication Meeting” held on the 14th November 2018, in which college officers and campaign coordinators discussed issues they saw with the lack of communication. When asked about the agenda of this meeting, Murphy told The University Observer that some of the proposed solutions raised to address event promotion were for college officers to “promote themselves and reps events” which he said would be boosted on the SU’s social media accounts, while campaign coordinators will be promoted through Monaghan. According to Murphy, some of the proposed solutions to address the social media posts over the weekend, were for members of the Executive and Campaign Co-ordinators “to give anything for inclusion in All Student Email [sic],” giving Class Representatives a deadline of the Executive meeting prior to when the event is scheduled. However, the minutes from both the Union Council and Executive suggest that these solutions were not followed up on, with

the sixth Executive meeting taking place at the beginning of semester two noting that some members still have an issue with the Union’s communication. Members of the Executive also heard that a number of Campaign Co-ordinators were not invited to receive training and feel “sidelined”, generally and at the Union’s Council meetings. Minutes from the meeting indicate dissatisfaction among Executive members over the situation, with a number of Campaign Co-ordinators believing they should receive training similar to that received by Sabbatical Officers. Additionally, an unstated number of Class Representatives from last year’s by-elections “were not informed” of Union Council, suggesting that they were subsequently absent from Council meetings, and that College Officers “do not know their class reps.” There was an acknowledgement that Class Representatives “won’t want to engage with a union where there is no communication.” 8 Campaign Co-ordinators sit on the Union’s Council and are tasked with fronting campaigns to push the organisation’s agenda on issues such as gender equality, the environment and mental health. An additional Campaign Co-ordinator for Diversity & Inclusion will be elected at the final Council meeting of this year should Union members vote to adopt a proposed constitution at a referendum on 1st and 2nd April. The Executive was told that a number of the Union’s College Officers were not informed of training sessions held for Class Representatives, which was described as “not okay” in the meeting’s minutes. Members of the Executive heard that College Officers were subsequently “unable to answer questions” coming from their Class Representatives. Law College Officer Edward Leonard stated that he could not meet with a Class Representative for Law as he had not received the results of a contested by-election and did not know who the Representative was. Members also expressed frustration over the formerAgriculture, Food Sciences and Veterinary Officer Amy Mulchrone, as relevant Class Representatives had received “no contact from their College Officer.” Under Union rules, Mulchrone de facto vacated her seat on the Union’s Executive Forum due to persistent absences from Executive and Council meetings. At a Council meeting

in January, Murphy stated that Mulchrone’s absence was “disappointing” and unfair on those who had contested Mulchrone for the position last year. A member of the Union Executive, Mulchrone had never attended a meeting of the Executive or Council. Organisers of Class Representative bonding sessions failed to address accessibility issues in advance, with Executive members lamenting that affected students were not informed early enough that neither the transport nor the accommodation were wheelchair accessible. Union sources have told The University Observer that sabbatical officers Barry Murphy, Niall Torris and Thomas Monaghan were responsible for organising the trip at which a student who required a wheelchair had to be carried around and be booked into a hotel to stay there on their own, despite allegedly requesting to be booked into accommodation with other trips-goers. Apologies were issued by the relevant Executive members. Minutes show that the Union may also be experiencing difficulties communicating with University officials, with Leonard stating that he has not received replies from Paul Masterson, Marketing & Events Manager for the UCD Sutherland School of Law. In response, Murphy suggested that “someone has pissed him [Masterson] off” as “he has stopped replying to our emails.” Concerns were also raised that Union events were inadequately marketed to students, with an Executive member noting that “certain societies are appearing more on the SU social media then [sic] some of our own events.” “Advertising for events needs to be improved”, one member stated; “for example for bingo loco the event was only advertised 2 days in advance”. The Executive also heard calls for more sponsored social media posts for the Union’s events, in particular for Lá Na Gaeilge. The Union’s Campaigns & Communications Officer Thomas Monaghan is responsible for social media communications and for the Union’s website, which has not been updated to include details such as the names and contacts of this year’s College Officers. Executive members heard calls to update it as soon as possible and were told that “the lack of improvement on [the website] is unacceptable.”

UNIVERSITYOBSERVER.IE

Exec minutes reveal uproar over cancelled SU events Dylan O’Neill DEPUTY EDITOR UCDSU Welfare Officer Melissa Plunkett expressed her outrage over the postponing of the “It Stops Now” roadshow campaign against sexual harassment and assault, recently released minutes from the 6th UCDSU Executive show. Plunkett described as “insane” the move to push the campaign to semester 2 as it had “just launched” in October, stating that, as the contact for the campaign, it was “frustrating to not know what’s going on”. UCDSU President Barry Murphy told the Executive that UCDSU did not “have the capacity to run it before exams” and that “it needs to be run properly.” The minutes note that Murphy was “tasked with [organising] the roadshow” alongside Head of Student Advisory Services Aishling O’Grady. Murphy told the Executive that the roadshow “will go from building to building...over three consecutive days.” The “It Stops Now” roadshow by UCDSU was originally to be organised in the 2nd and 3rd week of January according to Murphy, but no such roadshow video was produced during the SU’s Sexual Health and Guidance (SHAG) Week, which ran from 13th-14th of February. Plunkett expressed frustration as she had requested to be involved with the roadshows’ organisation. USI affiliated universities launched a video on their social media platforms, featuring “consent murals” from different third level institutions. UCD’s mural was removed in semester 1 by Estate Services after the October launch of the “It Stops Now” campaign. Minutes also reveal exasperation over the cancellation of an event between the Union, the Access and Lifelong Learning (ALL) Centre and the Literary & Historical Society (L&H). Records from the meeting on 1st October 2018 show that an event with the Access and Lifelong Learning Centre in UCD would “discuss inequalities on campus and...highlight and celebrate the work UCD ALL does in these areas.” This event was originally intended to “be run in cooperation with the L&H with a debate night and motion on the issue.” A lack of resources and time were cited by President Murphy as to the cancellation of the collaborative house debate between the Union and the L&H during the ALL Week on the 27th November. Murphy stated “we brainstorm ideas for events internally and externally in conjunction with societies regularly. While many events come to fruition others remain in the brainstorming phase. Sometimes they are not viable or we do not have the resources to make them become viable at that time.” However, correspondence between the SU and the L&H show that a draft programme was suggested, containing a time and date, motion for the floor and format for the event. The correspondence also shows that Dr. Anna Kelly from ALL told Murphy and Plunkett that “senior University representatives” could possibly attend and that the Centre would “provide the food, and speaker gifts.” Auditor Ella McLoughlin contacted Murphy on the 31st October to enquire on “any update regarding the ALL debate,” and received a reply from Plunkett who apologised for the lack of “adequate information to organise this debate.” Plunkett stated in the email “when I asked Barry about it he assured me that you [the L&H] were handling it.” Plunkett then provided McLoughlin with the draft programme that was sent to her by Dr. Kelly for the event. McLoughlin contacted both Plunkett and Murphy to raise concerns relating to a time clash with Lawsoc house debates and the motion’s wording. “We would have a very hard time finding guests to run the opposition (ie; University should not be open to all). We could run something more specific? ‘This House believes financial support is the best way to have access for all’ for example, and advertise it as ‘The Access for ALL debate.’” McLoughlin asked if the Centre wanted student or guest speakers but received no reply. The University Observer reached out to both the L&H and Dr. Kelly in the Centre for comment, but received no reply at the time of publication.

19TH FEBRUARY 2019

1


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.