University Observer Volume XVII Issue 9

Page 1

VOLUME xViI ISSUE 10

Ne quid false dicere audeat ne quid veri non audeat

IRELAND’S AWARD-WINNING STUDENT NEWSPAPER

1st March 2011

COMMENT

FEATURES

EATING DISORDERS ARE EXAMINED AS PART OF OUR MENTAL HEALTH SERIES

WE DEBATE WHETHER THE UCD HORIZONS SYSTEM HAS BEEN A SUCCESS FOLLOWING ITS FIVE-YEAR ANNIVERSARY

Page 9

OTWO

O-two 2ND MAR

The Univ ersity Obs erver’s Arts

MARTIN SHEEN SPEAKS ABOUT HIS ACTING CAREER AND HIS BEST FILM TO DATE

Page 15

2011 ISSU E 10 VOL.

& Culture

XVII

Supplem ent

Martin Sheen

O-two talk to Martin about Sheen The We st Win humani g, his tarian work and best-ev er role his

+INSIDE >> GOING OUT VS STAYING IN > OTWO ATTEMPTS PARENTING > UCD FASHION SHOW > MEAN GIRLS 2

Desk shortage consigns students to floor during mid term exam Amy Bracken News Editor

A

round 30 first-year Economics students took an MCQ exam while sitting on the floor due to a shortage of seats and desks in the exam hall. The first-year Principles of Macroeconomics class arrived for their midterm MCQ in Blackrock Exam Centre on February 24th to discover that there was a shortage of desks. Those students who didn’t have seats had to complete their exams while on the floor. One student told The University Observer: “There was a crowd; there was a lot of people going into the exam and a lot of confusion as to where we were sitting. But then it just turned out that there weren’t any seats, or not enough at least.” The student said that the time limit was taken off the exam and that the students could take as long as they wished to complete it. Course Lecturer, Dr Ivan Pastine, told The University Observer: “The balance of registration for the module between semester one and two this year was different from the past, with more students than expected taking the module in semester two and the usual number of seats was not sufficient. Consequently, we had approximately 30 more students than seats.” Dr Pastine said that in addition to adjusting the time limit, he also offered those students who did not have desks the opportunity to wait and take the exam when some of the desks became vacant. Dr Pastine continued: “The school is taking steps to ensure that this does not happen again. We are also amending the marking system for the course to ensure that nobody’s grade is adversely affected by the rocky start to last night’s exam. I am very happy to meet with any of the students who had to wait for a seat and would like to discuss their exam.” Students’ Union Education VicePresident James Williamson criticised the handling of the situation: “I think the exam should have gone ahead, but I think that the 20 or so students should have been catered for instead of being told to sit on the floor. Being an exam, everybody has to be assessed in the same way, be it the amount of time, or being given a chair; the proper facilities.” A UCD spokesperson told The University Observer “the university is satisfied that no student will be disadvantaged by the seating issue”. The affected student said: “It didn’t really affect my knowledge in any way. It was an honest mistake. The man apologised for it anyway.”

A represenative for UCD’s contract clamping company NCPS fails to adhere to parking regulations.

Students admit cheating to secure high grades Paul Fennessy and Quinton O’Reilly

A

former UCD student has admitted that he was paid to sit three exams for two struggling students in the Semester One 2008 Christmas exams, one of whom had failed at least one exam previously. In an in-depth interview with The University Observer, the student, who cannot be named for confidentiality purposes, secured an A and A+ grade in two of the exams, while he was unsure of his grade for the third exam. One of those students for whom he sat the exam, who also cannot be named, confirmed the veracity of his statements. The student who sat the exam said that he was paid a “significant” amount of money for his services. He admitted

to being apprehensive about sitting the exam and acknowledged how: “The consequences of getting caught are massive. I know I didn’t, but I’m pretty sure you’d get expelled.” He also said that he would be unlikely to accept the opportunity to sit someone else’s exam again in exchange for cash, but added that he would not rule out the possibility of this happening: “It’s probably not feasible and it’s unlikely to ever arise again based on my situation at the moment. That’s not to say if the price was right or the circumstances were right, I wouldn’t.” One of those students who paid him to sit the exam also spoke to The University Observer, expressing regret for his actions and admitting: “It was a bit stupid to do it.” The student claimed that the grades he

attained illegally “made zero difference” on his overall degree and added that he would not encourage others to cheat. He neglected to criticise UCD despite their inability to identify the cheating, saying: “It’s not a UCD problem; it’s a third-level problem.” Despite these revelations, it is not believed that cheating is a significant problem in UCD. The number of students cheating in exams has fallen due to the new student card fine introduced this term. The measure aims to prevent students allowing other people to take an exam on their behalf. SU education officer, James Williamson, stated that while he didn’t have official figures at the time of print, the introduction of the student card fine brought about “a large drop in students forgetting

their student card and I would say there was a drop in cheating in general because of this.” Speaking to The University Observer last November, a spokesperson for the university said: “We’re not prepared to give out specific figures mainly because it’s a university wide issue as opposed to a UCD-specific issue. But there hasn’t been any change in the pattern over the last few years, so they’re not seeing any sudden spikes because of the proliferation of iPhones or mobile phones or things like that.” University officials were unavailable for comment at the time of going to print. Reaction and Analysis: page 3. Editorial: page 2. Full Interview: page 11.

TCDSU seeking legal action over unregistered student voters Sarah Doran Chief News Reporter

T

rinity College Dublin Students’ Union (TCDSU) are considering legal action after a number of TCD students were turned away from polling stations in the capital during the General Election. The students, who had taken part in a TCDSU registration drive last November, arrived at various polling stations on February 25th under the jurisdiction of Dublin City Council to discover that they were not listed on the register of electors. TCDSU Campaigns and Communica-

tions Officer, Tom Lowe, explained that the voter registration forms had been hand delivered to Dublin City Council in individual envelopes in advance of the closing date. “We got them in on time so as far as I’m concerned, I just can’t see why this problem is emerging,” he stated. “Something that makes it so incredibly difficult for people to vote, even that there is a register of electors at all seems pretty strange to me,” Lowe said. “It’s a very strange system and it’s one that we’ll be pushing [to reform] after this event.” UCDSU Campaigns and Communications Vice-President Pat de Brún echoed Lowe’s call for reform of in light of Friday’s events. He believed that the fact that UCDSU sponsored registration drives were held

last September, two months before the deadline, might have contributed to the success of UCD’s student applications. However he did not believe TCDSU were at fault. “I have firmly placed the blame at the door of the county councils and of the electoral system. I’m actually on a task force with USI on electoral law reform and we’re working on some kind of lobbying campaign to have it reformed,” he stated. Lowe said: “As far as [TCDSU] are concerned, it’s not an issue that we have with Dublin City Council, it’s the system that needs reforming”. At the time of going to print, 14 formal complaints had been submitted to an e-mail account set up by TCDSU in order to assist students. He stressed that the volume

of complaints was surpassed by the anger of those students who were turned away. “I think we definitely will be looking into taking legal advice from a Professor in Trinity College,” Lowe said. Both Lowe and de Brún expressed their disappointment for the students affected: “It’s just frustrating when you want to enable people to have their voice heard and to become politically active,” “that you end up facing administrative hassles.” said Lowe. In a statement issued on Friday evening, Dublin City Council confirmed that all applications received before the official deadline had been processed and stated that it could not explain why some students who claimed to have submitted the appropriate forms had not been listed on the register of electors.


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.
University Observer Volume XVII Issue 9 by The University Observer - Issuu