Vol. XXIII - Issue 5 - Berliner

Page 1

UO the UNiversity oBserver ABOVE STUDENTS AT THE CRPD MARCH OUTSIDE LEINSTER HOUSE Photo aLex fLoss-JoNes

MENTAL HEALTH EXPERIENCES IN THE LGBTQ+ COMMUNITY shaUNa GaviN P15

January 24th 2017 volume xxiii issue 5 universityoBserver.ie

ACCOMMODATION HORROR STORIES FROM THE FRONTLINE OF STUDENT ACCOMMODATION emma tooLaN P11

uCD lanD that was “perfeCt for Development” iDle for 10 years BiLLy vaUGhaN featUres editor UCD HAS no plans to further develop a site that it received from Denis O’Brien as part of a land swap concluded between 2007 and 2008. It was expected that student accommodation could be developed on the site. A governing authority document from 2008 detailed that UCD would “now [have] a site, adjacent to the Belgrove apartments that will enable expansion of these apartments.” Multiple other recommendations at the time claimed that the site could be used to develop Belgrove further. UCD’s campus development plan 2016-2026, released in August 2016, shows no plans for building on the site. There have also been no planning applications submitted for the site. This is despite extensive plans for new accommodation across campus. The UCD-owned Roebuck land currently houses a car park. The land acquired by Denis O’Brien from UCD has recently been granted planning permission for luxury apartments. It is estimated that he will make approximately €50 million from the development. A 2010 report by Sherry Fitzgerald of the transac-

tion stated that they believed O’Brien would “build no more than two houses on the Thornfield site.” UCD exchanged land it owned at Thornfield with land at Roebuck owned by O’ Brien. UCD also received a cash payment of €15 million under the deal. €8 million of this would go towards the building of the new Student Centre, while the cost of contractual obligations under the deal would also have to be paid out of the payment. UCD had considered the land at Thornfield to be unfit for the development of student accommodation given the amount of private two-storey houses surrounding the site. However a Costello Commerical report and valuation of the lands in 2007 described the land as a “prime residential area” with potential for more than 50 dwellings. Advice that UCD received at the time appears to have been highly favourable towards the deal. Sherry Fitzgerald and Costello Commercial, both appointed to oversee the deal, stated multiple times that the Roebuck site would be a good choice for future development of student accommodation. A report by Grant Thornton, hired to provide a

cost-benefit analysis of which site would be better to build on, concluded that building costs would be high and potential revenues would be lower on the Thornfield site, and that it would ultimately make a financial loss. The Roebuck site was put up for sale by the Little Sisters of the Poor in 2007. At the time UCD made a bid for the land. O’Brien’s company also made an offer “totally in excess of market value,” according to the Sherry Fitzgerald report. Shortly thereafter he made a proposal to UCD to acquire their land at Thornfield. Both sites are roughly the same size, but the Thornfield land also has access to the N11. Six bids were submitted to the Little Sisters of the Poor when the Roebuck land went up for sale. Documents released to the University observer also acknowledge that UCD was approached by several student accommodation operators at the time. They offered to buy the Roebuck land and develop accommodation if UCD entered into a long-term occupancy lease with them. UCD have declined to comment on future plans for the land.

THE YOUNG OFFENDERS AN INTERVIEW WITH TWO RISING YOUNG STARS otwo P16

SAN LORENZO’S BRUNCH OF CHAMPIONS aUse aBdeLhaq otwo P7

aCaDemiC reGulations unDer review aLaNNa o’shea News editor A WORKING group has been set up to review all of UCD’s Academic Regulations. The academic regulations provide undergraduate and graduate students with definitions and guidelines about modules, grade descriptions and semesterisation. These guidelines include information about the maximum and minimum number of credits students can take in a semester, the number of modules a student can fail and still progress to the next stage of their course and which modules can be taken as electives. According to Lexi Kilmartin, UCD Students Union’s Education Officer and a member of the working group, the aim of the review is mainly to “make the regulations more user friendly” both for staff and students, as well as cleaning up some of the language. However, she says that more substantive changes could be made, as this as an opportunity to “set the goal posts.” The Academic Guidelines are reviewed by the Academic Council each year, but many of the regulations for undergraduates have remained the same as when they were first put in place in 2007. “Obvi-

ously there are some things that they need to change and need to take into account,” says Kilmartin. “UCD is a very different place than it was ten years ago.” The regulations also need to take into account some of UCD’s educational partners, such as NCAD and the Institute of Bankers, as their academic regulations come under the university’s regulations. NCAD formed an alliance with UCD in 2010, while the Institute of Bankers became a school of UCD in 2006. Changes to the regulations could include alterations to how elective classes are offered. Recommendations have come from the Elective’s Review Group and Implementation Group, who wish to bring in more interdisciplinary modules and change how elective modules are distributed. At the moment, a module needs to get an exemption if they don’t want to offer any elective places but according to Kilmartin this could change, as for some modules “it doesn’t make sense to offer elective places”, while “some modules are really oversubscribed.” The regulations may also remove the requirement

for students to take an elective module in the first semester of first year. According to Kilmartin, this will allow students to get a bit more taste of what college is like and then they can make a more educated choice of elective in future semesters. Academic Regulations include structures for whether a student can progress to the next stage of their course after failing modules. At the moment, students can progress to the next stage of their degree carrying ten credits of modules they have not passed and any changes to this regulation could have a large impact on the rate at which students progress through their degree. Kilmartin is looking for students to reach out and give their feedback to the working group on the changes they would like to see in their Academic Regulations. She can be reached at education@ ucdsu.ie. A report by the working group is planned to be finished by March, which will then go to the Academic Council in May. Implementation, Kilmartin says, will take much longer and these changes will most likely come into effect in the academic year beginning in 2018.

2016 FILM RECAP EXTRAVAGANZA otwo P10

FIRST FORTNIGHT INTERVIEW WITH THE COFOUNDER OF THE MENTAL HEALTH FESTIVAL eZra maLoNey otwo P28

January 24th 2017 1


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.