uo The University Observer Generation Protein the dangers that suppliments are causing to this generation
Interview An interview with renowned Irish UFC fighter Conor McGregor
LGBT Outreach the questions transfolk deal with on a daily basis
above UCD SVP set up for Homeless Week outside the James Joyce Library
Fionnán Long p8
Jack Walsh P14
Sam Blanckensee P7
photo james brady
SU demand greater rights for UCD residents
november 12th 2013 Volume XX issue v universityobserver.ie
peter hook The rock legend talks to otwo about being an icon
Rebekah Rennick otwo p12
Kevin Beirne editor
UCD Students’ Union (UCDSU) has launched a campaign that seeks to improve the rights of students living in UCD Residences. Under the current licence to reside, the terms and conditions that all those living on campus must agree to, students have fewer rights than private tenants. At present, Residential Assistants (RAs) can enter students’ apartments without prior notice and begin filming, so long as they “clearly alert everyone in the vicinity of the student apartment when their recording equipment is in use.” Private tenants are allowed to refuse entry to their landlord if they have not received 24-hour’s notice. UCDSU General Manager, Philip Mudge, said that the campaign was based on the fact that “in simple terms, rights that were long-fought and hard-won in terms of private tenancies are not respected within
tenancy agreements on campus.” The #RESRIGHTSNOW campaign will include a march from the SU Offices in the old Student Centre to the Merville Residence Offices on Thursday, November 21st at 1pm. According to UCDSU President, Mícheál Gallagher, the campaign focuses on four specific points: “reduced fines, a fair system of appealing the fines, ending the use of inspection cameras in apartments and finally, ultimately renegotiating the licence to reside.” During the 2010/11 and the 2011/12 academic years, the combined amount of deposits retained by UCD Residences almost totaled €200,000. According to a spokesperson for the University, these retained deposits “are reinvested into fixtures and fittings, appliances, and the physical structure.” For UCD residents, any fines that
are imposed can only be appealed to the same body that has passed down the original fine, and it is possible that an unsuccessful appeal will lead to an increased fine. UCDSU has described the cost of these fines as “extortionate.” The University also defended the use of cameras “in the interests of safety and security,” saying that RAs “have recording devices as part of their equipment which may be used when attending to an incident in student residences. This is in line with the Universities Safety and Security Policies.” In response to this, Gallagher said “UCDSU cares deeply about the safety and security of students of UCD. However we feel that cameras are a breach of students’ fundamental right to privacy as guaranteed in the [Irish] constitution. Moreover this is not something that occurs
» UCDSU claims licence to reside breaches constitutional right to privacy » UCD Residences retained almost €200,000 worth of deposits over two years
in private tenancy agreements. “Simply stating that this is in line with University policies does not make the situation acceptable. There have been incidents where students have been in towels going between their rooms and the communal showering units, and regardless of alerting students that cameras are being used this is not acceptable.” RAs have only been formally allowed to film inside of students’ apartments since Clause 23 was introduced to the licence to reside before the previous academic year. Clause 23 states, “In the event of an actual or potential risk of injury to people or of damage to property, enforcement may include the use of CCTV or other recording devices which may record the activity of the occupier and any other persons attending at the premises.”
Senior lecturer fails to overturn gender bias appeal » High Court upholds Labour Court’s initial ruling » Justice Cook said complaints of gender discrimination were not valid
John Cooke said that there was no apparent error of law and that no valid reasons for overturning the decision by the Labour Court had been presented by Dr O’Higgins. Dr O’Higgins’ initial appeal to the Labour Court referred to her second application for a professorship in 2007. Her follow up appeal to the High Court requested that the Labour Court rehear her case. During the proceedings of her appeal to the Labour Court, Dr O’Higgins suggested gender discrimination could be argued on three accounts in relation to the selection process for professorship in UCD. The balance of gender on the promotions committee, which contained 12 men and
one woman, was challenged. Following a review of the selection process, the Labour Court asserted that the promotions committee had valid grounds for rejecting Dr O’Higgins’ application for professor because she did not meet the sufficient academic criteria for promotion. Dr O’Higgins still disputes the grounds on which her appeal to the Labour Court was rejected. She feels the court failed to acknowledge all the evidence and material presented, while also failing to undertake an analysis to compared the academic credentials of each candidate up for promotion. She also claims that the Labour Court’s adjudication didn’t account
Otwo P16
kerrie o’brien
poet Kerrie O’Brien talks about her love of travelling
Killian Woods deputy editor
An appeal to the High Court made by a senior lecturer in the UCD School of Law and Business claiming gender discrimination was a factor in the decision to not promote her to professor has been turned down. Dr Eleanor O’Higgins brought her action to the High Court in order to challenge the decision handed down by the Labour Court. In November 2012, the Labour Court heard her case and it was adjudicated that gender discrimination did not factor in the decision of the promotions committee (UCAATP) not to promote Dr O’Higgins to professor. In the final judgement in the High Court last Friday, Mr Justice
Orla Gartland The Dublin-born musician talks to Otwo about her new EP ‘roots’
Ellie Gehlert Otwo P22
for the committee’s lack of expertise in business ethics, therefore affecting their ability to judge her application, and reiterated the gender imbalance on the panel. When delivering his final verdict, Justice Cooke stressed that there was no element of competition between the applicants for promotion and that there was no threshold for the numbers of promotions that could be approved. Justice Cooke also addressed the matter of the Labour Court’s role in Dr O’Higgins’ appeal process. Cooke said that the court’s role was to examine the complaint that gender bias factored in the process of applying for professorship, and not deciding if Dr O’Higgins had grounds for promotion.
ucd weather
Foil Arms & Hog
The lads ask you to trust them when they say trust no one Foil Arms & Hog Otwo P2 by cathal nolan
Tuesday
Wednesday
Thursday
Friday
Saturday
Sunday
Wet & Windy
Sunshine & Showers
Sunshine & Showers
Sunshine & Showers
Periods of Rain
Sunshine & Showers november 12th 2013