NATIONHOOD POWER & INTERGOVERNMENTAL IMMUNITIES: WHERE DOES THE POWER VEST
that the functioning of the state and their mechanisms have been curtailed, or burdened and will continue to be if CARDA is to continue operating in its current form.
The dissenting judgment made by French CJ in Clarke applies a multifactorial assessment and provides a six point framework in reaching his Honours decision. 53 The supportive reasons for this approach mentioned that the implied immunity principle that was distinguished in the case of Austin, was and always has been, evaluative. French CJ mentions that when judging whether the effects of a law, in regards to, the capacities or functions of the states are significant should be judged, qualitatively, in reference to its practical effects. 54 This is yet to be applied in any leading case law, but instead carries a persuasive tone, due to it being made in reference to the case of Austin, which is relatively recent. However, one may conclude that French CJ multifactorial assessment inherently carries a view to potentially draw too narrow, and thus, limit the scope for the High Court to apply their reasoning when attempting to classify or apply whether intergovernmental immunity is present.
C Conclusion of Intergovernmental Immunities In summary, the executive would be left with a substantial chance of interfering with state power by interfering with the state health ministers and other high level officials within the health departments of each state, and therefore a curtailment or special burden would likely be placed on the states and their ability to function as a government, as found in the second principle of the MCD and raised in the decision of the QEC and later clarified through the case of Austin and then confirmed in Clarke. However, the executive should consider providing funding to support CARDA and consider to either provide funding directly to the states in accordance with section 96 of the AC, which is supported by the outcome of the decision in Williams II. In Conclusion, it is likely that the states would be able to establish an intergovernmental immunity against section 2 of CARDA as supported by the case law previously discussed.
53
Clarke v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (2009) 240 CLR 272 at [299].
54
Ibid at [298].
- 15 -
