Utah Statewide Archaeological Society Newsletter, Volume 5, Number 4, December 1959

UTAH ARCHEOLOGY A Newsleq:er Vol. 5, No. 4 Editor's Notes

December 1959 • • • • •

2·

The Utah Statewide Archeological S~rvey: Its Background; and First Ten Years • • .James H. Gunnerson

.I 3

•

0

o

G

•

•

eo.

000

0

c

Proposed"Constitution and . By-Laws for the Utah 'Statewide Archeological ~ociety • • • Notice to Members.

.' ,

o

0

0

~

e

0

e

0

0

•

0

0

•••

•

•

•

• •

000

17 19

UTAH- STIlTS HISTORtCAl: SOGfEITY be',] EAST SOUTH THAPLE ~~AL T LAKE C.lTYK iJJiJ:!

UTAH ARCHEOLOGY is published quarterly by the Utah Statewide Archeological Society. Correspondence should be directed to.: Utah Statewide Archeological Society, P.O. Box 98 9 Moab, Utah

EDITOR'S NOTES The Society: A constitution and by-laws for the Utah Statewide. Archeological Society have been drafted by its officers and are included in this issue of the newsletter. Each -member . of . the Society is asked to vote on the constitution ~nd bylaws by marking the attached ballot and returning it to the Secretary before March 1, 1960. It is sugge~ted that all members read the proposed constitution and by~laws carefully to note proposed changes in the organization. ,

The Newsletter: This is the last issue of UTAH ARCHEOLOGY to be prepared on the University of Utah campus. Starfing with Volume six James H. Gunnerson will turn over the editor's j6b to Lloyd Pierson of Arches National Monument, Moao, Utah.

Rumor has it that the new editor has a number of ideas which should improve the newsletter.

This Issue: The article by your editor in.--this issue provides a brief history of archeology in Utah. The bibliography, while by no means exhaustive on the subject of Utah archeology, should provide a useful guide into the literature for members of the society who wish to do further reading.

Cover: The pictograph which appears on the cover is the last in a series from Barrier (Horseshoe) Canyon which is located about 40 miles south of Green River, Utah. The originals of these figures, which are here reproduced in approximately natural color, are each about 1 ft. 10ng o

-2-

THE UTAH STATEWIDE ARCHEOLOGICAL SURVEY~ ITS BACKGROUND ¡AND FIRST TEN YEARS James H. Gunnerson The Utah Statewide Archeological Survey was established in 1949 as a part 9f the Department of Anthrop.ology of the Univ~rsity of Utah'o, The survey, as envisaged, was to have several functions o First of all, it was to undertake a reconnaissance to determine the range and extent of Utah's archeological resources Once the initial survey was completed, key sites were to be excavated in order to fill gaps in our knowledge of Utah prehistoryo The Survey was alsq to serve as an agency for the salvage of archeological material threatened with destruction by such things as darn and highway constru~tiono 0

The activities of the Statewide Survey have always been closely i~tegrated with other archeological activities of the Department of Anthropology at the University of Utah o As first conceived, the Survey was to be conducted by graduate students in Anth.ropology as part of their training After two years ~ however, field director Jack R Rudy was appointed as a full time member of the staff of the Department of Anthropologyo Field expenses have been provided primarily by the University of Utah .

Research Fund o 0

At the inception of the Survey, Utah was by no means unknown archeologicallyo Reports on Utah archeology had appeared in the literature as early as 1876 (Barber 1876 , Palmer 1876, Putnam 1876) but much of the early work is of no value beacuse it was never reported, and adequate notes are not available o :'

The University of Utah, which began to sponsor archeological work in the early 1900's has been the only agency with long-continuing research activities focussed on Utah problemso However, its early approach was not very systematic, since most investigations consisted primarily of following up leads offered by people who had accidentally discovered interesting siteso -3-

Much of the early work was done in San Juan County, where sites are richest and most numerous, but since little of the digging was reported, part of what is known of the area exists essentially as oral tradition 0 The monumental and classic monograph by Brew (1946)1 reporting the extensive work done on Alkali Ridge in 1931-1933 1 marks the turning point in the deplorable tradition of digging without adequate reporting 0 In tracing the history and extent of Mesa Verde archeology, Brew (l946,ppo 15-31) summarized the sparse published information on the archeology of San Juan County through about 19440 What is essent~lly an abridgement¡ of Brew's summary was prepared by Tobin (1947) 0 Some of the more useful and informative of the earlier published reports of San Juan County archeology are Pepper (1902)$ Prudden(1903), Kidder (1910), Cummings (19l0),Fewkes (1917 9 1919), Judd (1924), Steen (1937) and Leh (1938, 1939 9 1940). These, for the most part, are accounts of reconnaissances and brief reports of excavations.

The Rainbow Bridge~Monument Valley archeological survey concentrated its activities of the 1930's in northern Arizona but did carry out limited reconnaissance in squthern Utah~ both east and west of the Colorado River (Beals, Brainard and Smith 1945)0 The pre-1949 archeological work in Utah north and west of San Juan County was less extensive but more completely reported o Between the years 1915 and 1920 Judd, for the Bureau of American Ethnology, devoted five summers to the first systematic archeological survey in Utah, concentrating on a north-south strip through the center of Utah, and the southwestern corner of the state.

Preliminary accounts of the survey work appeared yearly in the Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections and the final report, in a single volume (Judd 1926), is a landmark in Utah archeologyo Judd also conducted limited excavations at sites near Willard$ Beaver and Kanah (Cottonwood Canyon) (Judd 1926) and rather extensive excavations at Paragonah .

(Judd 1919).

- 4-

.\

Prior to 1949, but following this basic work by Judd, several archeologists reported survey activities and site' excavations widely distributed over the state. The work

by Nusbaum (1922) at Cave Du Pont is noteworthy. Morss (1931) conducted a survey with limited excavation, primarily in the Fremont River drainage, but with some work at Boulder, Utah and in Nine Mile Canyon. Spencer (1934) 'made a survey of part of the Virgin River drainage near St~ George, Utah and Leh (1937) reported a brief reconnaissance in Range Creek Canyon near Price, Utah. Reagan published " many short articles, especially on Uintah Basin archeology (Gunnerson 1957b, pp. 150-163)~ but even the more detailed ones (eg-. Reagan 1931a, 1931b, 1931c,il 1933, 1935) are of only limited usefulness.

The most intensive and systematic survey before 1949 was one conducted by Steward (1941) in south central Utah in the Johnson Canyon-Paria River region and in Glen Canyon of the Colorado River. Steward also excavated at open s~tes ~n central Utah near Willard, Plain City, Grantsville, Provo, and Kanosh and in the Uintah Basin, near La 'Point (Steward 1931, 1933a); in caves on Promontory Point and at ' Black Rock at the north and south ends of .:,: _.; Great Salt Lake respectively (Steward 1937). Several of Steward's reports reflect his problem orientation and' contain sections of interpretion or synthesis. In addition, he wrote three significant articles devoted primarily to interpretive discussions (Steward 1933b, 1936, 1940) and a ' genera1 work on petrog1yphs which included data from Utah (Steward 1929).

Following Steward, Gillen excavated sites in Nine Mile Canyon in Carbon County (Gillen 1938) and near Tooele, Marysvale and Ephriam in central Utah (Gillen 1941).

In southwest Utah, extensive excavation in Zion Park and limited survey in the surrounding area were carried out under the direction of Wetherill and Smith in 1933 and 1934 (Smith 1940, Schroeder 1955). Subsequently, excavations of caves at the south end of the Great Salt Lake were reported by Smith ~941, 1952), Enger (1942) and Jameson (1958). At about the same time limited reconnaissance was conducted in the Deep Creek area of

extreme west-central Utah (Malouf , Dibble and Smith 1940).

A site near Cisco in the extreme east-central part of Utah was excavated between 1939 and 1948 by Wormington (1955).and her report includes a summary of the archeology nortq of the Colorado River in Utah and the adjoining states.

Since 1949 both the University of Utah and several organizations from outside the state have sponsored archeological investigations in Utah o In the Beet' Basin area San Juan CountY 9 the National Park Service conducteda limited survey (Baldwin 1949)0 The Museum of Northern Arizona has done a great deal of work in southern Utah primarily ~ survey and salvage associated with the construction of the Glen Canyon dam (Foster 1952, Danson 1958, Adams and Adams 1959). In southwestern Utah, the University of Southern California with the cooperation of the ,College of Southern Utah ~ has had a continuing excavation program at Paragonah since 1954. Only the first year's excavation and limited nearby survey has been reported thus far (Meighan ~ Coles .? et.al. 1956).

0+

At the start of the Statewide Survey in 1949, Utah was divided into areas, with the highest work priority going to the one about which the least was known (Rudy 1953, ppo ix-x). It has been necessary at times to deviate from the order of priority as or~jnally established to permit salvage activities to be carried out. The first area to be surveye~ in fac~ was Washington County in the southwest corner of the state , where the construction of two dams in the Virgin River drainage was proposed (Rudy and Stirland 1950). One site p Pine Park Shelter , in Washington County was also excavated (Ru'dy' 1954b). Originally this area had only an intermediate' priority.

0

The Survey next moved into the area of highest priorityp western Utah.? with an extensive archeological reconnaissance (Rudy 1953)0 As part of the attack on oi 1rnI"'lT'~n nn't'"t-oio .... o-F tho st-"' .... o tho th ois noo 1'"' . ' r'v -J .. ... _vv J:'- .... _ ... -"""'-"'-, ........ n",oivors +-y excavated Danger Cave and Juke Box Cave near Wendover, Utah (Jennings 1953 ~ 1957) and an open site near Garrison, Utah (Taylor 1954)0 ...L..

-~....

U&.&...L.

-..;..,

..&..-

(

The Survey again abandoned its order of priority in 1952 to do work in Beef Basin in San Juan County.

This archeologically rich area, nearly inaccessibl~ until · 1950 when the Bureau of Land Management constructed roade; into it, was rapidly being ravaged and prompt action was needed to salvage scientific data o Survey and excavation of key sites was conducted by Rudy (1954a , 1955)0 The Statewide Survey activities there were supplemented by reconnaissances by Hunt and Wilson (1952), research associates of the Department of Anthropology at the University of Utah. Hunt (1953) also conducted an intensive survey of the nearby LaSa1 Mountain area o In 1954 James Ho Gunnerson replaced Jack R Rudy as field director of the survey and its long range survey activities were again resumed , this time in eastern Utah (Gunnerson 1956a, 1956b, 1956c, 1957a, 1957b , 1957c) with accompanying excavation of two open sites near · EmerYi Utah by the Department- of Anthropology's archeological field school (Taylor 1957)0 Two articles devoted to broad synthesis and based in part on Utah archeological data appeared at about this same time. One is by Jennings and Norbeck (1955) and the other was edited by Jennings (1956) .

The Survey was diverted from its long-range plan again in 1957 with the advent of the University of Utah's Upper Colorado River Basin Archeological Salvage Program, a project carried out under contracts from the National Park Service to salvage data ahead of inundation by the Glen Canyon and Flaming Gorge dams o This project made possible work in the Glen Canyon area , so difficult of access that the Statewide Survey might never have been able to finance work there.

Reconnaissance and excavation have proceeded concurrently since 1957 when the first two field parties started working in the southwestern part of the reservior area (Lister 1958a» Gunnerson 1959a)0 In 1958 , six University of Utah field parties were in or near the Glen -Canyon area (Fowler , Gunnerson , eta al a 1958 , Fowler 1958 , Gunnerson 1958 , Lipe 1959)0 Additional

-7-

\.

reports of 1958 and 1959 work are in preparation and field work is continuing. Two seasons of excavation at the Goombs Site in Boulder» Utah have been completed by the Universities of Utah and Colorado to supplement the Glen Canyon work (Lister 1958b, 1959, Ambler 1959).

During 1959, the Statewid~ Survey initiated a highway salvage program in which highway right-of-ways are irtvestigrated ahead of construction and any necessary salvage excavation is carried out (Gunnerson 1960Q).

This work is being done with the cooperation of the Utah State Road Commission and the UoS. Government, which is providing the funds for much of the highway construction.

Also during 1959 the Survey carried out, under contract from the National Forest Service, an archeological survey in Hammond Canyon in San Juan County and evaluated it as a possible archeological interpretive area (Gunnerson 1960a) • The Survey has also served as archeological consultant for the Utah State Park Commission and in 1958 "conducted an archeological reconnaissance for the Commission in the· Dead Hdr~~P6iht a~~a {GunnerWbn1959bjo During its first ten years, the Statewide Su~vey has been called upon to perform many other functions such as undertaking limited archeological surveys and salvage jobs in conjunction with construction worko . It has been instrumental in organizing the Utah Statewide Archeological Society and in publishing its newsletter, Utah Archeology.

Moreover, it has provided information in response to numerous inqul.rl.eso Thus , it has served as a link between professional archeology and the large number of people interested in the archeology of Utah. Most important, however, the Utah Statewide Archeological Survey has collected data from many archeological sites in all parts of the state. With this information at hand, it become~ increasingly possible to outline an effective program of intensive survey of key areas and excavation of key sites to provide maximum information about the prehistory of Utah o

BIBLIOGRAPHY

__ Adams, William Y. and Nettie K. Adams 1959 An Inventory of Prehistoric Sites on the Lower San Juan River, Utah. Museum of Northern -Arizona Bulletin, No. 31.

Ambler, J. Richard 1959 A Preliminary Note on 1959 Excavations at the Coombs Site, Boulder, Utah. Utah Archeology, Vol. 5, No.3, ppo 4-11.

Baldwin, Gordon C. 1949 Archaeological Survey in Southeastern Utah. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology, Vol. 5, No.4, pp. 393-404.

Barber, E.A. 1876 Ancient Pottery of Colorado, Utah, Arizona, and New Mexico. Americap Naturalist , Vol. 10, No.8, pp. 449-464.

Beals, R.L., George W. Brainard and Watson Smith 1945 Archeological Studies in Northeast Arizona. University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology, Vol. 449 No.1.

Brew, J.O. 1946 Archaeology of Alkali Ridge, Southeastern Utah.

Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology, Papers, Vol. 21.

Cummings, Byron 1910 The Ancient Inhabitants of the San Juan Valley.

Bulletin of the Universi ty of UtahL Vol. 3, No.3, Pt. 20 Danson, Edward B. 1958 The Glen Canyon Project.

-9-

Plateau, Vol. 30, pp. 75-78.

E;1~r,

Walter D. 1942 Archaeology of Black Rock 3 Cave, Utah. University of Utah Anthropological Paper No.7. (Republished 1950).

Fewkes, J. Walter 1917 Prehistoric Remains in New Mexico, Colo~ado, and Utah. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, Vol. 66, No. 17, pp. 76-92.

194) Prehistoric Villages, Castles, and TowelS of South~~ . western Colorado. Bureau of American Ethnology, Bulletin, No. 70.

Foste/, Gene 1;02 A Brief Archaeological Survey o~ Glen Canyon.

Plateau, Vol. 25, No. 2~ pp. 21-26.

'. '

FOW~~' Don l7~ Archeological Survey in Glen Canyon: A Preliminary Report of 1958Work o Utah Archeology, Vol. 4, No.4, pp. 14-16.

FQwler, Don Do, James H. Gunnerson, Jesse D. Jennings, Robert H. Lister, Dee Ann Suhm and Ted Weller 1959 The Glen Canyon Archeological Survey. University of Utah Anthropological Papers, No. 39. '.

John Archeological Investigations in ¡Nine Mile Canyon, Utah. University of Utah Bulletin 28, N.o. 11. (Republished 1955 , University of Utah Anthropological Papers, No. 21.)

Archaeological Investigations in Central Utah. Peabody Museum of American Archaeology and Ethnology , Papers, Vol. 17 , No.2.

Gunnerson, James H. 1956a Utah Statewide Survey Activities--1955.

Archeology, Vol. 2, No.1, pp. 4-120

J'

Utah

1956b 1956 Archeological Activities of the University of Utah. Utah Archeolog~, Vol. 2, No.3, pp. 4-14.

-10-

..

GU~~ ;fson,

James H. l)o6c A Fluted Point Site in Utah.

Vol. 21, No.4, pp. 412-414.

American Antiquity,

lqrfa Uinta Basin Archeology. Guidebook to the Geology of the Uinta Basin , Eighth Annual Field Conference, Intermountain Association of Petroleum Geologists, Otto G. Seal, Editor. pp. 15-16.

19)7b Archeological Survey of the Fremont Area.

I of Ut ah An t hropolog i cal Pap e m, No. 28 .

University

l J'7C Preliminary Report of 1957 Work at Snake Rock.

Utah Archeology , Vol~ 3, No.4, pp. 7-12.

Archeological Survey of the Kaiparowits Plateau-A Preliminary Report. Utah Archeology, Vol. 4, No.3, pp. 9-20.

19~a

1957 Excavations in the Glen Canyon Area. of Utah Anthropological Papers , No. 43.

University

lJf59b Archeological Survey in the Dead Horse Point Area.

Utah Archeology , Vol . 5, No . 2, pp. 4-9.

I

Archeological Survey in the Hammond Canyon Area, Southeastern Utah. Manuscript, Department of Anthropology, University of Utah.

1960~~ighWay ~

Hunt

I

Salvage Archeology Near St. George, Utah.

Manuscript, Department of Anthropology, University of Utah.

Alice

19~ 3 Archeological Survey of the ~aSal Mountain Area,

,J

Utah. Universit y of Utah Anthropological Papers , No 14.

0

i

Hunt, Alice P o and Bates Wilson 1952 Archaeological Sites in the Horse Canyon Area, San Juan County, Utah. Manuscript report on file at the Department of Anthropology , University of Utah.

-11-

'"r_

/

~eson,

1958

"1

~yaney

"I"

"

Jo~o

Archeological Notes on Stansbury Island. of Utah Anthropological Papers, No. 34.

University

Judd~ .Mo ~9

Archeological Investigations at Paragonah, Utah.

Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, Volo 70, No 30 0

19zK/ Explorations in San Juan County, Utah. Smithsonian ;' Miscellaneous Collections , Vol. 76, No. 120 1926/ Archeological Observations North of the Rio / Colorado 0 Bureau of American Ethnology, Bulletin 82.

Kidd~{ A.V. 1~0 Exploration in Southeastern Utah in 1908. American Journal of Archaeology,Volo 14, No.3, ppo 337-3800 Leh, Leonard L. 1937 Prehistoric Pueblo Ruins in Range Creek Canyon, Utah.

Qniversity of Colorado Studies, Vol. 23, Noo 2Âť pp.

159-168 0

191

Some Surprises at the Wilson Ruin in San Juan

County, Utah. Southwestern Lore" Vol. 3 9 No.4, ppo 66-69, 72-730 ---12-

Leh~ ... ~eonard 1~~

19~

L. Further Studies at the Wilson Ruins.

Lore~ Vol. 4, No.4, pp. 68-72.

Southwestern

A Prehistoric Population Center in the Southwest.

Southwestern Lore, Vol. 6, No.2, pp. 21-25.

Lipe~yi11iam 19~

Lis~~, 1~8a

19~ 19~

Archeological Excavations in Glen Canyon: A , Preliminary Report of 1958 Work. Utah Archeology , Vol. 4, No.4, pp. 4-13.

Robert H. The Glen Canyon ' Survey in 1957.

Anthropological Papers , No. 30.

University ' of Utah

A Preliminary Note on Excavations at the Coombs Site, Boulder, Utah. Utah Archeology, Vol. 4, No.3, pp. 4-8.

The Coombs Site.

Papers, No. 41.

University of Utah Anthropological

Ma10yf, Carling, Charles E. Dibble and Elmer R. Smith , 1,40 Archaeology of the Deep Creek Region, Utah. University of Utah Anthropological Papers. No.6. (Republished 1950).

Meighan, Clement W., Norman E. Coles, Frank D. Davis, Geraldine M. Greenwood, William M. Harrison, and E. Heath McBain 1956 Archeological Excavations in Iron County, Utah.

University of Utah Anthropological Papers l No. 25.

MO:is,

Noel /931 The Ancient Culture of the Fremont River in Utah.

Papers of the Peabody Museum of American Archaeology and Ethnology, Harvard University, Vol. XII, No.3.

Nusbaum, Jesse L. Basket-Maker Cave in Kane County,Utah with l~ A Notes on the Artifacts by A.V. Kidder and S.J. Guernsey. Museum of the American Indian , Heye Foundation , Indian Notes and Monographs, Miscellaneous,) No. 29.

-13-

Palm~ y l8~

Edward Exploration of a Mound in Utah.

Vol~ 10 9 No.8, pp. 410-414.

American Naturalist,

peppel , George H. The Ancient Basket Makers of Southwestern Utah.

American Museum of Nattral History Journal, Vol. 2, "No.4, Supplement.

19p1 I

prud~n,

T .M. 19 3 The Prehistoric Ruins of the San Juan Watershed in . Utah, Arizona, Colorado and New Mexico. American Anthropo l ogis t, n.s.j) Vol. 5, No.2, pp. 224-288.

Putnam, J.D .

1876 Hieroglyphics Observed in Summit Canyon , Utah.

Proceedings , Davenport Academy of Nattr~l Sciences, Vol. 10

Reagan~lbert Bo ~a ~ome

Archaeological Notes on Nine Mile Canyon, Utah.

El Palacio , Vol. 31, No o 4 , pp. 45-71.

193 f 6 Additional Archaeological Notes on Ashley and Dry ! Fork Canyons in Northeastern Utah. El Palacio , Vol. 31, No.8, pp. 122-131.

19~- Some

Archaeological Notes on Hill Canyon in Northeastern Utah. El Palacio ~ ~ol. 31, No. 15, ppo 223-244.

Anciently Inhabited Caves of the Vernal (Utah) District, with some Additional Notes on Nine Mile Canyon 9 Northeastern Utah o Transaction of the Kansas Academy of Science , Vol o 36, 41-70 0

19/5

Archeological Report of Field Work Done in Utah 1934-350 Transactions of the Utah Academy of Sciences & Arts and Letters, Vol. XII, ppo 50-88.

Ru dY~.LRack R 19~3 Archeological Survey of Western Utah. University of Utah Anthropo l ogi cal Papers, No o 120 -14-

.,

Rudy, Jack R 19~a University of Utah Archaeological Field Work, 1952-1953. Southwestern Lore , Vol. XIX, No.4, pp. 13-15.

195~Pine

Park Shelter, Washington County, Utah.

j1~ of Utah Anthropological Papers , No. 18.

19)6

University

Archeological Excavations in Beef Basin, Utah. ' University of Utah Anthropological Papers, No. 20.

Rudy L Jack Rand Stir1and, Robert D. 1910 An Archeological Reconnaissance in Washington County, Utah. University of Utah Anthropological Papers, No. 9.

Schroeder, Albert H. 1915 Archeology of Zion Park. University of Utah, / Anthropological Papers , No. 22.

Smith, Elmer R. 1940 A Brief Description of an Indian Ruin Near Shonesbueg, Utah. University of J'Utah Anthropological Papers, No.4. (Republished 1950).

19rt

The Archaeology of Deadman Cave, Utah. of Utah Bulletin , Vol. 32, No.4.

,University

19~

The Archaeology of Deadman Cave, Utah: A Revision University of Utah ¡Anthropo1ogica1 Papers, No o 100

Steen/ C.R. 19J7 Archaeological Investigations at Natura1 ' Bridges National Monumento U. S. National Park Service, Southwestern Monuments , Monthly Report for May 1937, pp. 327, 329-337.

Steward, Julian H. 1929 Petrog1yphs of California and Adjoining States.

University of California Publications in American Archaeology .a nd Ethnology , Vol. 24, No.2.

l~

Archaeological Discoveries at Kanosh in Utah.

E1 Palacio, Vol. 30, No o 8~ pp. 121-130 0 -15-

Stew rd , tJulian R. 193 a Early Inhabitants of Western Utah, Part I, Mounds and House Types. University of Utah Bulletin,Vol. 23, No.7.

7a

19~rChaeOlOgiCal

Problems of the Northern Periphery of the Southwest. Museum of Northern Arizona, Bulletin No.5.

Pueblo Material Culture of Western Utah. of New Mexico Bulletin , No. 287.

University

Ancient Caves of the Great Salt Lake Region. of American Ethnology, Bulletin 116.

Bureau

l~ Native Cultures of the Intermontane (Great Basin) Area. In: "Essay in Historical Anthropology of North America." Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, Vol. 100, pp. 445-502.

Archeological Reconnaissance of Southern Utah.

Smithsonian Insitution . Bureau of American Ethnology, Anthropological Papers p No. 18 3 in Bulletin 128, pp. 277 .. 356.

Sp'encer, J.E. 1934 Pueblo Sites of Southwestern Utah. American Anthropologist, Vol. 36, No.1, pp. 70-80.

I

Tay~~, Dee C.

;54

1s7

The Garrison Site.

Papers, No. 16.

UniverSity of Utah Anthropological

Two Fremont Sites and Their Position in Southwestern Prehistory. University of Utan Anthropological Papers, No. 29.

Tobin, Samuel Jo 1947 Archaeology in the San Juan. ~niver sity of Utah Anthropological Papers , No.8. (Republished 1950.)

Wormington, H.M. Y955 A Reappraisal of the Fremont Culture. Denver Museum ~. of Natural History , Proceeding~J No o I. -16-

PROPOSED CONSTITUTION AND BY-LAWS OF THE UTAH STATEWIDE ARCHAEOLOGOCAL SOCIETY Chapter I Name The name of this society shall be the Utah Statewide Archaeological Society. " Chapter II Purpose The purpos~ of this society shall be to increase and diff~se archaeological knowledge and to preserve and protect the archaeological heritage of Utah for the mutual enjoyment of all.

Chapter III Membership Any person interested in the aims of the society shall be eligible for membership.

Chapter IV Management Sect. 1. The society shall be managed by the officer of the society who shall be elected from the membership:.

Sect. 2. Officers shall consist of a President, Vicepresident, Secretary-Treasurer, plus an ex-officip Advisor.

Sect. 3. Election of officers shall take place at the biennial meeting of all member~.

Sect. 4. Vacancies of any office shall be filled from the membe~ship by the other officers.

Sect. 5 The officers shall select an editor for the society I s newsletter "Utah Archaeo1ogy" 9 who should be, if possible, a professionalÂĽtrained archaeologist residing in Utah.

Sect. 6. Local chapters may be formed at the request of three of more citizens of Utah who are paid members of the society.

Chapter V Meetings Sect. 1. The Society shall have a biennial meeting to carryon the business of the Society each even numbered year.

Sect. 2. Special meetings shall be called at the discretion of the officers or upon the request of five members.

Sect. 3. All members shall be notified of special meetings at least ten days in advance.

Sect. 4. Seven members present make a quorum for biennial and special meetings.

-17-

Chapte,r VI Amendments The "constitution may be amended by a two-third vote , of all qualified members at any stated meeting.

-,

BY.!.LAWS Article I Membership Contributions Dues for individual membership shall be assessed at $2.00 per year or yearly dues for all members of a local chapter, as a group, shall be $15.00 but those members of such a group desiring to receive IJUtah Archaeology" shall b~ assessed an additional $1.00 per year to cover its cost.

Article II Duties of Officers Sect. I. The President shall exercise general supervision of the affairs of the Society and shall preside at its meetings.

Sect.~.

The Vice-President shall act in the President's absence.

Sect. 3. The Secretary-Treasurer shall have charge of the official records of the Society, keep a record of the membership and meetings, ' collect the monies an9 keep the financial ~ecords. He shall make a full report at the biennial meeting of the financial condition of the Society and of the receipt and disbursements he has made under the direction of the officers of the Society.

Sect. 4. The Advisor shall be the head of the Department of Anthropology at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah or his designated representative. His duty shall be to lend professional advice and wisdom to the Society's endeavors and to provide such professional assistance as he may be able.

Article III Amendments These By-Laws may be amended by a two-thirds vote of all members qualified at any stated meeting.'.

-18-

..

NOTICE TO MEMBERS

The opposite constitution and by-laws have been- drafted by the officers of the Utah Statewide Archeological Society and are here presented for consideration by the mempers of the society. Each member is asked to detach and mark the ballot below and to mail it, before March 1, 1960 in an envelope bearing the member's signature in the upper left hand corner to: Secretary, Utah Statewide Archeological Society P.O. Box 98 Moab, Utah The ballot itself should not carry the member's name.

Any comments on the constitution should be sent to the Secretary in a separate envelope.

Ballot

,.

Proposed "Constitution and By-Laws for the Utah Statewide Archeological Society" are published in Vol. 5, No.4 of Utah Archeology , this, the current issue of the newsletter of the society. Do you, as a member of the Utah Statewide Archeological Society, favor adopting the proposed constitution and by-laws?

,/ 7'

Yes

/

No

7

-19-

...

~~

. "'--'::--_..-----

=---=------ - --:::

UTAH ARCHEOLOGY of Anthropology University of Utah Salt Lake City, Utah

Dep~rtment

Utah S~ate Historical Society 603 East South Temple

Salt Lake City 2, Utah

I