The Daily Beacon

Page 1

Follow us: @DailyBeacon

‘Assassin’s Creed: Revelations’ necessary, worth wait

Vols fall to No. 6 Duke in Maui Invitational

Tuesday, November 22, 2011

PAGE 8 T H E

E D I T O R I A L L Y

Issue 67 I N D E P E N D E N T

PUBLISHED SINCE 1906

PAGE 5

http://utdailybeacon.com

Vol. 118 S T U D E N T

Scattered T-Storms 40% chance of rain HIGH LOW 73 59

N E W S P A P E R

O F

T H E

U N I V E R S I T Y

O F

T E N N E S S E E

Speaker addresses realities of sweat shops Nike, adidas among apparel companies accused of subjecting workers to bad conditions Victoria Wright Staff Writer Buying a new pair of Jordans before the holidays just became less appealing. The Central Programming Council Issues Committee hosted the event “Behind the Swoosh” Wednesday evening in the UC Auditorium. About 250 people gathered to hear activist Jim Keady speak about the unequal economic and human rights practices Nike uses in sweat shops overseas. “This is a trans-national corporate empire,” Keady, a former Division-1 athlete, coach and professional athlete, said. “They exercise imperialist values that run completely counter to the values of democracy.” During the presentation, Keady explained his undercover experience working in a Nike sweatshop in Indonesia after being forced to resign from a coaching deal at St. John’s University because he refused to endorse Nike products. During his time there, he witnessed workers suffering verbal and physical abuse and the hardships of making $1.25 a day. Keady described one account of a worker who was punished by sun drenching, where workers are taken outside during the hottest period of the day and are forced to bake in the sun. Keady said this struggle is not targeting Nike exclusively as the main culprit of abusing overseas workers. “I utilize Nike as a case study to look at a range of different issues,” Keady said. “Labor issues, corporate policies towards how they treat their workers, the environment — they can be applied to 90 to 95 percent of the companies that make clothes and shoes, even adidas.” Currently, Nike has the largest global market share in the athletic footwear industry, holding 31 percent of total share; adidas comes in second, holding 16 percent of total share. Shoes from these com-

panies cost about $16.25 to produce, but sell at a price of about $220. Nike grossed about $19 billion in 2009, with $14 billion of profits stemming from their footwear. Ben Davidson, senior in business administration, believes access to information plays a huge role in the discrepancy between low wages of sweatshop workers and the high profits of Nike. “It does seem like there are a lot of inequalities and injustice in the system,” Davidson said. “When you look at the profits that they are enjoying as a company next to the minuscule wages they’re paying, I can see a cause and a reason for reform.” Davidson also added that “corporate muscle,” or the practice of intimidating employees, adds to the prevention of labor unions and any real changes among employees. Keady said creating a fair-trade Nike is possible. About $300 million is needed to pay workers fairly and could easily be accomplished by cutting their marketing cost. Keady explained the 3-percent cut would pay endorsed athletes, such as Lebron James, about $97 million instead of $100 million. Keady added that college students have the ability to make an impact on Nike’s practices, as students between the ages of 12-22 spend about $425 billion collectively on clothing and footwear products from companies such as Nike. However, positive action in fighting against inequalities of Nike has proved effective. A group called “United Students Against Sweatshops” helped 1,800 workers from two Nike factories in Indonesia receive $1.5 million in severance pay. “Companies want them — they court them,” Keady said. “We’re more than consumers. As Americans, we’re also citizens and we have to be active civic participants and engage these companies in ways to create the change we want to see.”

Tara Sripunvoraskul • The Daily Beacon

Jim Keady speaks with the audience during a lecture on the business practices of Nike in the UC Auditorium on Wednesday, Nov. 16. Keady gave students a first-person account of the economic and human rights issues that are common in overseas sweat shops operated by the internationally-known company.

Speaker discusses Japan disaster Rob Davis Staff Writer

Hannah Cather • The Daily Beacon

Alakazam, The Human Knot, perches on top of a post in preparation for the final act of his show in the UC Auditorium on Friday, Nov. 18. The entertainer mixed in bits of twisted comedy with his traditional, although somewhat unsettling, contortion act.

Students, faculty and the public were on hand this week for UT’s Science Forum featuring Dr. Larry Townsend. Townsend spoke at the weekly forum on the impact of the destruction of the Fukushima nuclear power plant and the impact it has had on the regulatory practices in the United States. “On March 11, 2011, at 2:46 p.m. local time, there was a magnitude 9.0 earthquake,” Townsend said. “This was the fifth largest earthquake in the recorded history of the world and the largest earthquake in recorded history of Japan.” The earthquake was so large, it caused Japan to move about 10 feet closer to the United States and sent waves up to 10 kilometers inland. Fukushima Daiichi was designed to withstand an 8.0- to 8.2-magnitude earthquake and a 19-foot tsunami. In the area where the Fukushima plant was located, the waves generated by the earthquake were approximately 47-49 feet high. “There were seven waves that hit the power plant,” Townsend said. “The first wave was stopped by the sea wall, the second wave breached the sea wall. After that, things got really interesting.” After the sea wall was crushed by the tsunami waves, the water rushed up and around the four reactor buildings. “After the magnitude 9.0 earthquake occurred, all the reactors were essentially shut down,” Townsend said. “The chain reaction stopped, but the reactor power doesn’t completely shut down. The power coasts down.” Because of the tsunami, the steam generators that powered the coasting cool down shut off, leaving only battery power to help it cool down. “What we have now is a complete station blackout,” Townsend said. “There is no power in the station.” The only thing officials had to rely on were

the features, such as submerged spent fuel, to protect the power plant from a complete meltdown. Eventually, steam was vented from the reactor buildings to relieve some of the pressure from the buildings. There was hydrogen mixed in with the steam and the four buildings blew up their upper 25 percent. Because of the explosion, the spent fuel was exposed to the air, and populations within 30 miles of the plant were evacuated. “The radiation released from Fukushima were about 10 percent of what was released from Chernobyl,” Townsend said. “The exposure at Chernobyl was 9-10 times greater than what was delivered here.” Few of the residents were evacuated, and there was virtually no contamination of any streams around the area. What happened to the Larry Townsend Fukushima Daiichi caused the United States to examine what could happen to their nuclear power plants in the case of a natural disaster. “The people that operate plants are now required to reevaluate and upgrade as necessary,” Townsend said. Essentially, the owners are to go back, examine what their earthquake and tsunami ratings are and determine whether or not they should upgrade these to higher levels. Another aspect that was examined was what happens when the plant is experiencing a blackout. Now, there are reserve power generators some distance away that will solely give energy to the power plant in order to move steam and help the spent fuel stay under the cooling water. Although the U.S. has imposed these improvements, some feel that there are other aspects they could examine. “I think that most of (Townsend’s) points are great, like the suggestion to extend regulations in case of something severe,” Matt Price, junior in mechanical engineering, said. “The waste is also clearly an issue; but this is also a problem in other power plants. Kingston, Tenn. can attest to coal plant waste also being very destructive.”


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.