oenlx ,
CONTENTS
STAFF
Sections Pages Non-fiction ........................................................ 3 Fiction ................. '........................................... 6 Art .............................................................. 10 Reviews .......................................................... 14 Poetry ........................................................... 18 Photography . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .................................... 22
Editor Richard Robyn ~..anaging
Editor
Mike Altizer
Fiction Editor
Art Editor
Ray Trotter
Linda Rothwell
Review Editor
Poetry Editor Linda Lyle
Ski Hilenski
Ihotography Editor Harlan Hambright
Pho to contributors:
Advisory Chmmittee
Harlan Hambright-6, 7, 22,23, back cover David Stansbury-3, 14, 1 7 Mike Altizer-18 and front cover
Mr. Richar4 LeFevre Dr. Richard Penner
Prospectus He who becomes a new fresh to the campus, of (if editor, veteran editor, and you will) burning old ideas former editor all within the and creating something new space of four months speaks from the ashes of those with a voice of admittedly ideas, in the best sense of the dubious experience. The ancient myth of the Phoecapsulation involved here is nix. Of the changes that have rather like losing your virginity by spending a week in been made, the most obvious bed with a whore. It can be is the paper. Newsprint was shocking, trying, mysterious, first brought to our atoften gruelling. But, I sup- tention only through econopose, it is at all times mic necessity, but as work on the magazine progressed, in teresting. One thing that was inter- the enormous possibilities esting was the attitude the inherent in this particular staff took toward the Phoe- paper form began to open nix. We began this quarter up. To begin with, it is now with the notion that what possible to print something was past for the Phoenix was close to all of the material decidedly past, and that that needs to be published there was no idea, either in each quarter. The fact that the technical or the purely there is more material in this creative sense, that was issue than in any previous immune from criticism or one is ,gratifying to editor s not subject to being dropped who have been forced time when and if we decided to and again to cut whole pages drop it. This does not mean of articles, poems, photoa complete break with the graphs, and artwork. This past, making change a virtue 'increased space is possible in and tradition a deplorable light of more mundane convice. It rather nleans bringing siderations such as lower all the ingenuity and honesty printing costs and less printthat we as editors, writers, ing time. Greater distribuartists, and critics of the tion is another factor, with immediate present, to bear this issue reaching more , on the problem of rendering people than any previous this outlet for creation a one. But those are technical more thoughtful, responsive organ on campus. That is not changes: of far more interest easy: pulling the stops out in to us, and hopefully to you, this way brings problems on are the innovations in conyour head, many problems. tent and style of display. But it also, I think, gave Each genre covered by the those of us that worked with Phoenix now has its own the magazine an exhilerating section. Each of those secfeeling of doing something tions is given a unity and new, of bringing something form unique to its own
particular nl0de of expression by way of its own type style, column width, display and introductory photograph. (For those of you who are graphic arts freaks, this is the assignment of type style: ,clear, solid newspaper style 9 point Century medium for nonfiction; the more elaborate and elegant 11 pt. Univers for poetry; 8 pt Univers for reviews, which is a smaller and clearer style; and 10 pt Press Roman for fiction, which is the old Phoenix style. Variations in column widths and headlines are too numerous and too involved to mention here.) One of those sectionss, reviews, has for the first time its own editor, and has more reviews than in any other previous issue. Revamping of the contents page was perhaps more from technical considerations than an itching to be different. And, at long last, the issue includes humor by two of the most famous and most creative minds on campus, Dan Staten and Vince Pomeroy. Or is it ... ? Well, whatever. The changes mentioned have nothing to alter the quality of the content: this will improve or decline only according to the temperament of those artists who contribute to the magazine. But we feel, perhaps with perverse satisfaction that comes to all editors who have the opportunity to review the work of talented people, that the contents in this issue are the very finest this campus can produce at this time. Phoenix '71
1
And finally, this quote from Dickens in Martin Chuzzlewit could not be passed up. Although his two characters are referring to America, their remarks could also be applied to the symbolic dimensions , of this magazine. "I was a-thinking, sir," said Mark, "that if I was a pain ter and was called upon to paint the American eagle, how should I do it?" "Paint it as like an Eagle as you could, I suppose." "No," said Mark. "That wouldn't do for me, sir. I should want to draw it like a Bat, for its short-sightedness; like a Bantam" for itS bragging; like a Magpie, for its honesty; like a Peacock, for its vanity; like an Ostrich, for its putting its head in the mud, and thinking nobody sees it-"
"And like a Phoenix, for its power of springing from the ashes of its faults and vices, and soaring up anew into the sky," said Martin. "Well, Mark, let us hope so." The staff hopes, with this issue and the others that follow, to prod itself to create, and in doing so, to prod others to create for it. If you, our readers, disagree with the results of our attempts, we ask-better yet, we demand-that you meet us with your ideas and that if you can find the time and energy, you work with us to make the next issue one of more substance and more importance. It can be done: whatever sins committed in the past should never haunt a future we ourselves can make better.
R.R.
"Ah! We're beginning to get some feedback!" Reprint permission Saturday Review