Arts
Sports
Index
Boesak's book reviewed -pg.n
Basketball teams make playoffs
News -pg 2 Editorial -pg. e Spring Break Preview -pg.g-u
-pg- 16
H o p e College
^
I he anchor Volume 102, Number 18
A window through the walls
Hulk
U.S.
Rule
Pus I aye
PAID Permit HV)1 Holland,
Ml
February 28,1990
Hope alum pushes for disinvestment policy by Jim Monnett editor Dr Allan I'.oesak s honorary degree has sparked a Hope College alum to renew the t all to the Board of Trustees to pass a formal policy against investment in countries that do business in the Republic of South Africa. Hope alum Rev.Donald T.Van Hoeven (class of '56), a chaplain at Western Michigan University, sent a letter to Boesak at Cape Town applauding Boesak's work in South Africa and denouncing "Hope College's economic support for the racist government of South Africa." In response to Van Hoeven's allegations to Boesak, Hope College's Vice President of Business Jon Anderson said the College probably isn't invested in any companies involved in South Africa, but that the possibility remains. Dean for Student Development Dr.James Bekkering suggested the discrepency probable lies in the purchasing of mutual funds that often encompass many different stocks. At any time a mutual fund that Hope College is invested in might have some stocks of companies that do business in South Africa.
To Van Hoeven the mere possibility of owning stock in a South African affiliated company is wrong. 44Hope College itself refuses to break its ties with racism in order to maintain its corporate benefits," he said. Providing background material on Hope College's divestiture question, Bekkering said, "The Board of Trustees w r e s t l e d with this question several years ago." In May 1985 the Board of Trustees resolved to do four items on the question of apartheid in response to a petition signed by 700 Hope students and to two letters from Student Congress asking the Board to clarify Hope College's position. The Board reaffirmed a 1977 decision not to invest in any firms headquartered in South Africa and reasserts 4 'its strong condemnation of both the policy and practice of apartheid." The Board also appointed the Trustee Aparteid Task Force to find other ways for Hope College to make a difference in South Africa a s well as to adopt the Sullivan Principles. "The Board of Trustees," Bekkering said, "Voted to adopt a policy that would follow the Sullivan Principles "
Critical Issues Rita Nakashima Brock (left) and Nicholas Wolterstorff (right) are two of the speakers who will be taking part in the 1990 Critical Issues Symposium tonight and tomorrow.
Rev.Leon Sullivan is a black minister in Phildelphia who developed his principles as a guideline for socially conscious action in South Africa The seven Sullivan Principles were intended as an intelligent middle ground between the two polar views on divestiture. The one polar view calls for a complete financial pull-out of South Africa and the other view argues that only through involvement in these companies can institutional change be done. The Sullivan Principles require companies to sign an agreement to follow them. Each of the principles addresses practical ways to integrate a company. For example, Principle III s a y s , ' ' E q u a l p a y f o r all employees doing equal or comparable work for the s a m e period." Sullivan's seventh principle argues for divestment within two years of 1985 if aprtheid had not been ended by that time. Hope history professor Dr.Earl Curry said that Sullivan himself later rejected his principles as unworkable. "Sullivan c a m e to see that his own efforts to get companies to integrate wasn't working a s he had foreseen," said Curry.
According to then Hope College President Gordon Van Wylen in January 1986, "The Board of Trustees decided to not alter (the) policy in regard to investments... (with) a conviction that American firms who adhere to the letter and spirit of the Sullivan Principles are in a position to be a part of the force for change in South Africa." A n d e r s o n c o n f i r m e d that presently the Sullivan Principles are the guiding force behind Hope College's investment portfolio.
Responding to Van Hoeven's statements about whether or not honoring Boesak is inconsistent without a formal policy against investment in South Africa, Bekkering said, "I don't s e e the two as related. They're both in the s a m e country, but the award is for Dr.Boesak's work." "What the college is doing," Bekkering said, "Is affirming (Boesak) in a very public way.'* Faculty spokesman Dr. Stephen Hemenway could not respond for the faculty, but said, "Personally, I don't s e e an incon-
'We want the Board of Trustees to act morally to prevent the college from investing in companies in South Africa.' -Rev. Donald Van Hoeven Van Hoeven said that the Board of Trustees needs to do more by passing a policy against investment in South Africa. According to him, without a policy, any investor for the College could choose to reinvest in a South African company at any time. Speaking for people for total divestiture. Van Hoeven said, "We want the Board of Trustees to act morally to prevent the College from investing in companies in South Africa." "The key is what Allan Boesak will do," he continued. Van Hoeven hopes Boesak will call the college to accountability. In his letter to Boesak, Van Hoeven wrote, "While we all desire to see you recognized, it is also our responsibility to call the Board of Trustees to fulfill their responsibility as an arm of the church and to end their investments in the constitutionally racist government of South Africa. We ask for your help in the gaining of that goal.1' Van Hoeven said the Board is showing a "moral incongruity" by giving an honorary degree while refusing to pass an offical policy against South African investments.
sistency. The (award and the lack of formal policy) are connected. The giving of the award is a step in the right direction toward a g r e a t e r consciousness." Hemenway said he hoped Boesak's appearance and the entire Critical Issues would help to renew interest in a formal policy of divestiture again. He said Boesak's arrival was "a major victory" for those in support of divestiture as well as for the college overall. Commenting on the possible inconsistency Bekkering said, "What I find interesting is that people on both sides are in favor of dismantling apartheid. A lot of well-informed, outstanding people have opinions." Bekkering doesn't think that a formal policy against South African investment is necessary. He said, u r i n so thrilled to see the changes and the way the political winds are changing...It looks politically like things are moving in the right direction/' so Hope should step back and see what happens. Curry dissented, "Nothing has
continued on pg. 2