Lessons from Berlin
Why it matters more than ever
FREE
A Great Brexit Britain must learn from the past
Black History Month
Take a copy
Comment 14
Features 16
Jo’s plans
Gerard Lyons
Should students be given more say?
Let’s be optimistic about Brexit
News 4-5
Interview 2
Cambridge’s Independent Student Newspaper since 1947
Features 12 No. 813 Friday 14th October 2016 varsity.co.uk
University Press caught in Delhi copyright clash
Stallholder quit Freshers’ Fair after racist abuse
● Reprographics business battles with CUP and OUP over course texts after court victory last month
Louis Ashworth Editor Graduate careers website Milkround abandoned Cambridge’s Freshers’ Fair last week, allegedly after one of its stallholders was racially abused by an attendee, Varsity has learnt. The incident took place early last Tuesday morning, on the first day of the fair. Milkround immediately left the fair afterwards, and did not return for the second day. A spokesperson for the website, which allows students to apply for jobs, internships and graduate schemes, confirmed to Varsity that the incident had occurred, and said that Milkround is “currently in the process of filing a formal complaint” to the central University. The nature of the abuse, or any details about the identity of the attacker, are currently unknown. The fair, at which societies and businesses advertise themselves to students, is attended by 15,000 people a year according to CUSU, which organises the event. Amatey Doku, CUSU President, told Varsity he had not been made aware that the incident had taken place until after the two-day event had finished. “After the fair, I was alerted to a complaint that CUSU had received about racist comments made to one of the corporate stall-holders by an attendee to the Freshers’ Fair,” he said. He called for anyone with information to contact him, saying: “We have a zerotolerance approach to racism or discrimination of any kind and it completely goes against everything that CUSU stands for and we have communicated this to the affected party.” There was controversy at the Freshers’ Fair in 2010 when some students criticised student radio station CamFM for accepting sponsorship from Nestle.
Matt Gutteridge Deputy News Editor
The Pitt Building, home to Cambridge University Press
CALLUM HALE-THOMSON
Cambridge University Press (CUP) and Oxford University Press (OUP) will appeal the verdict of Delhi High Court in the so-called ‘DU Photocopy Case’, it has been announced. The case, filed against Rameshwari Photocopy Services, a small photocopy shop, operating under a licence from the University of Delhi (UoD) to reproduce course materials for university students, ended in victory for the defendants last month. Mr Justice Rajiv Sahai Endlaw, presiding, ruled that the packs, featuring between six and 65 pages of CUP and OUP publications fall within the “educational exception” clause of the Copyright Act 1957. The ruling overturns an injunction from October 2012 which banned Rameshwari from photocopying chapters of copyrighted books to students. The formal appeal accuses the UoD of “photocopying substantial portions (extending to ‘cover to cover’ copying) of copyrighted publications”, and claims that “unchecked unauthorised unfair copying for commercial gain has the potential of completely destroying the legitimate market for educational copyrighted publications”. The wording of the appeal has been criticised by some observers, who note that so-called ‘cover to cover’ copying was not the issue put before the judge in the original case, which centred only on the reproduction of excerpts.
The 2012 ruling drew mass condemnation from the academic community in India, and led to the formation of the Society for the Promotion of Educational Access and Knowledge (SPEAK), which acted as co-defendant in the case. Speaking to Varsity, UoD spokesperson Professor Shamnad Basheer said: “The court agreed with us on this count and ruled that access to education is an important constitutional right that must not be narrowly interpreted.” “Photocopying of course packs was always the norm in India prior to the 2012 injunction against Dehli University. CUP never went out of business, rather it went from strength to strength in India.” “One can’t help but think that there is a bit of a colonial undertone to this narrative of how a university in a developed country with an inside understanding of academic publishing sues another university in a country with severe resource constraints particularly on the educational front.” A group of postgraduate students from Oxford have called on students and academics to sign a petition calling for the University to withdraw from the appeal and “promote access to education in a fair and legitimate manner for students in India and more generally, across the world”. In 2013, over 300 writers and academics, including 33 whose works are at the centre of the case, signed an open letter, calling on CUP and OUP to withdraw the suit, including Cambridge alumni... Continued on page 8 ▶