Get the local look Vintage trends from Cambridge shops put to the test
INTERVIEW
→
Vulture
Fashion 22–23
FREE
Remember his name
Street shoot
Take a copy
Who’s walking in Hiddleston’s shoes?
Bryan Cranston
Romeo & Juliet returns to the Arts Theatre
Film & TV 24
Arts 24
Cambridge’s Independent Student Newspaper since 1947 No. 840 Friday 26th January 2018 varsity.co.uk
Intermitting students left abandoned
Two years on, still no justice Cambridge vigil for Giulio Regeni
Edward Pinnegar Senior News Correspondent
● Revealed Struggling students ineligible for benefits are left with no government support ● Lack of University aid compounds problems Todd Gillespie and Siyang Wei Students who take time out from studying have found themselves unable to claim financial support, leaving some in serious hardship, a Varsity investigation has discovered. Over 200 Cambridge students a year ‘intermit’, taking temporarily leave from the University to recover from an “illness or other grave cause”. Yet policy inconsistencies, unusually stringent tests for benefit eligibility, and limitations to available funds have left some intermitting students in dire financial straits – with many of them already struggling with serious health issues or a lack of financial support from family. Intermitting students are classified as full-time students by the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP), which often precludes their eligibility for state support, including out-of-work and meanstested benefits. Compounding this, the policy of Student Finance England (SFE), which provides tuition and maintenance loans, is inconsistent with the DWP. SFE does not consider intermitting students to be full-time, and so withdraws any student loans and maintenance payments. Students have accused the government of neglect, and argued that Cambridge colleges should pool resources to support intermitting students. CUSU disabled students’ officer
Cambridge’s pro-vice-chancellor for education, Graham Virgo, has defended the merits of the National Student Survey (NSS), debating CUSU Education Officer, Martha Krish, and Matt Kite of Cambridge Defend Education (CDE). The intervention by Virgo, in Varsity today, comes as the latest development in discussions – fraught with tension about the dangers, but also the potential importance, of students completing the survey – which have been ongoing since 2016. CDE and CUSU have criticised the NSS, saying that participation in the survey will lead to higher tuition fees and the marketisation of higher education. On the other hand, Virgo argues that the survey “provides students with a voice” which allows the university to “identify and remedy areas of concern”. While Virgo believes fees to be “unfair and unjust”, he writes that the NSS no longer affects them as directly because of a change in the law last year – a point that CUSU contests. He argues further that the publication of the results “helps prospective students from all backgrounds to make informed decisions” about applying to university, and that they are “used extensively” in the preparation of well-known league tables. Remarking on the extent of the survey’s benefits, Virgo adds that the NSS has been useful in the monitoring of the “adverse effect of a heavy workload on student mental health”, adding that students’ feedback has been “invaluable”.
Florence Oulds condemned the gaps in government support, saying they show a “lack of understanding of how intermission works, but also of disabled students”. A spokesperson for the DWP did not respond directly to the findings of Varsity’s investigation, offering to send information about benefits eligibility that is available online. The University declined to comment on Varsity’s findings. Except in exceptional circumstances, they are not eligible to claim income-related benefits unless they already claim Personal Independence Payment (PIP), a benefit for those with a serious longterm illness or disability. The criteria for PIP eligibility are extremely stringent, with the need to prove inability to complete basic tasks like “reading or communicating” and “washing, bathing or going to the toilet”. This is far beyond the threshold required for non-students to claim other out-ofwork benefits. The application process can also take several months, and only around half the claims are approved. Students can only obtain most other benefits after the resolution of their reason for intermission. Consequently, students who have intermitted due to ill health and are too ill to work but not eligible for PIP can be left, as one student described her experience to Varsity, in “penury”. Full story Page 6 ▶
Don’t ditch the student survey, Uni tells finalists
A vigil for Giulio Regeni outside King’s on Thursday
(MATHIAS GJESDAL HAMMER)
What does the NSS mean? Page 11 ▶ Should finalists boycott? Page 16 ▶
Inside ● Tobacco lobbyists back Conservative Association event Pg.7 ● CUSU cash struggles Pg.8–9