FREE Take a copy
Sustainable fashion is on the cards. Meet the women at its forefront.
Waste not, want not
Seeing pink, the Breast Cancer Art Exhibition Art 21 The best overlooked film scores
Features 12
Music 26
No. 860 Friday 1st February 2019 varsity.co.uk
Cambridge’s Independent Student Newspaper since 1947
The disc prod ‘Balance of probabilities’ recommended News Page 9 ▶
Cambridge’s 13.7% median gender pay gap Exclusive Noella Chye, Chloe Bayliss & Rosie Bradbury
▲ Data analysis by Varsity found the largest gender pay gap in the School of Humanities & Social Sciences
student and the most pro-divestment voice in the room. Before her first meeting with the group, she had asked herself: “How am I going to make them listen to me, this student?” When the group convened, Guillaume
The median gender pay gap between men and women across the University has remained at 13.7% for the past three years — an investigation by Varsity has found. Using the raw, annually-published data on staff pay distributed across the University’s pay spine, the median gender pay gap is calculated as the percentage difference between the salary of the midpoint of the distribution of men employed, and that of the distribution of women employed. In addition to the basic income paid out to staff, a small percentage of Cambridge employees are awarded market pay supplements – additional pay to
Full story page 10 ▶
Continued on page 6 ▶
(LOUIS ASHWORTH/COMPOSITE: NOELLA CHYE)
‘The whole process was flawed, flawed from the beginning.’ Guillaume speaks out Noella Chye Associate Editor When the divestment working group released its final report in May, 200 Cambridge academics signed an open letter calling the report an attempt to thwart divestment.
On Wednesday, news broke that working group members Professor Simon Redfern and John Shakeshaft were directly involved in donations worth £22m from BHP Billiton and BP to fund research in Cambridge. Alice Guillaume, who served on the working group for 11 months before she resigned in protest, said divestment was
never really on the table, and it could be traced to power asymmetries in the room. The working group was made up of ten people: two college masters, four academics, two members of the University’s primary decision-making body, one other student representative, then Guillaume, an undergraduate geography
Inside ● An interview with Preti Taneja Pg.2-3 ● NUS defunds postgraduate campaign amid large deficit Pg.4