Speaking to the SU presidents page 17
FREE Take a copy
Queerly Beloved / Learning to Love, page 22 Page 14 ▶
No.899 Friday 18th February 2022 varsity.co.uk
The Independent Student Newspaper since 1947
Watergate!
University bans use of coat of arms on thesis submissions
Chemistry student kept hot-tub in room for a year without College knowing
Cambridge University has banned the use of its coat of arms from thesis submissions for certain postgraduate qualifications. The ban applies to PhD, EdD, MD, BusD, MLitt and MSc students. The change was made despite a long tradition of the University arms featuring on thesis submissions, and has been met with anger from PhD students. Submitted academic work will now no longer have a visual association with the University, or be part of one of Cambridge’s oldest scholarly customs. The University stated that its logo “should not be used anywhere as your thesis is your work and not the work of the University.” They went on to specify, “If you wish to use a logo on your title
Eleanor Mann News Correspondent
page or the cover of your thesis, you are advised to ask your College about the use of their logo.” Cambridge’s coat of arms was adopted in 1583 after being granted by Robert Cook, Clarenceux King of Arms and graduate of St. John’s College, for use by the Chancellor, Masters, Fellows and Scholars. The shield features four lions between a cross ermine and a Bible laying at the centre, representing the University’s royal patronage, dignity, knowledge, and faith. The University has upheld a strict policy on its terms of usage for the coat of arms, distinguishing between its logo, motto and shield, adding that despite the coat of arms often mistakenly being called the “University crest”, the University actually has no “crest.” 2022 will mark the first year that students are banned from using the arms when submitting their work this Easter.
Plan to replace iconic King’s bunker shelved Jacob Freedland Senior News Editor
Jacob Freedland Senior News Editor When students move into college they can expect a decent bed, working toilet and if they’re lucky, an en-suite bathroom. But amidst the privacy that last year’s lockdown brought, one chemistry student, Richard (not his real name), was able to keep a luxurious hot-tub jacuzzi in his second year digs throughout Michaelmas and Lent. And the best part? The College never knew.
Richard bought the hot-tub for just £200 after he saw a listing on Reddit – a bargain compared to brand-new alternatives which sell for thousands more. Throughout Michaelmas and Lent, he would host intimate gatherings at his spa-like residence, making the most of his international roommate’s vacant bedroom to house the jacuzzi. Guests could expect drinks late into the night without having to worry about the dreaded knock on the door from a porter enforcing social distancing. According to one regular attendee the
hot-tub was “fairly nice”. It could fit five people comfortably and was quite deep – the water reached up to your waist if you stood up. Being a chemist, hygiene was also taken seriously. Richard made guests shower before and after they got in and he made sure to drain the pool every month.However, sometimes he wasn’t thorough enough. According to one friend, a group of freshers left with rashes having sat in water “full of eveStory continued on page 4 ▶
King’s College planned to turn their iconic bunker into a 200-seat conference hall, but have stalled plans due to a lack of funding. Despite years of hosting techno nights and bohemian parties, the £20 million ambitious project looks to transform the bunker into a “performance auditorium” – built for “academic and creative exchange” and fit with the University’s first “electroacoustic” recording studio. A move which the College says will bring “students and fellows closer together”. However, despite fundraising efforts which involve “naming opportunities” and “commemorations” for gifts over £10k, the College is more likely to opt for a reduced scheme.
The plans surrounding the bunker are set to be discussed later in the year, but the proposals have already frustrated students. According to one undergraduate, Sam (not his real name), “the idea that this project will ‘bring students and fellows closer together’ is laughable”. Similar development projects elsewhere in the College are “hardly for student use. We cannot use the bar for certain student-run events, since the floor is porous and expensive, and the same will be true of whatever soulless, white-walled Keynes Hall that they create. If King’s continue with this ‘enriching’ project, they will erode whatever student spaces existed to begin with”. According to the College, the renovation looks to improve the “mix of poorly Story continued on page 4 ▶
Inside ● Student by day, bouncer by night Pg.3 ● Once again, the UCU strikes out Pg.12 ● Big vs small pharma Pg. 16