Varsity Issue 918

Page 1

FREE Take a copy

Cambridge University Charity ‘Hello cockers!’: Fashion Show X Varsity Hacker pg. 24

T. Dog pg. 15

No.918 Friday 24th November 2023 varsity.co.uk The Independent Student Newspaper since 1947

Felix Armstrong

Your future in their hands University delays fossil fuel action

▲LOUIS ASHWORTH

Cambridge has delayed banning oil company research funding, kicking promised changes to relationships with major polluters further down the road. After being told to reform the process by which it scrutinises the research funding of fossil fuel companies, the University has subjected this process to multiple delays, which one campaigner has said could mean “a year or more” of inaction. A student campaign group has said that the University is “ignoring” the consensus of students and staff “in favour of delays and excuses”. The University has been under pressure since its academic governing body proposed terminating oil company research funding. After blocking the original proposals, Cambridge commissioned an independent inquiry into the University’s research links with the fossil fuel industry. The report, authored by Nigel Topping, a former UN climate champion for COP26, said that accepting BP and Shell funding poses “high reputational risk” to Cambridge. The University has accepted the findings of a working group, made up of the University Council, following the Topping report. But, the University has imposed multiple delays on these recommendations, requiring the “development” of a “Climate Research Strategy,” and the appointment of a new pro-vice-chancellor. Even the schedule of this report was pushed back multiple times, campaigners have said. Sam Hutton, Chair of the SU’s Ethical Affairs campaign, told Varsity that the report “took over a year to complete, breaking several deadlines set by the council”. The focus of the report’s recommendations is the process by which the University reviews and accepts research funding, which the Topping report demanded be “clarified”. This system, used to scrutinise the ethics of associating with fossil fuel companies, and which has been in place since 2018, was found to “lack clarity and transparency”. The board which reviews funding, the Committee on Benefactions and External and Legal Affairs (CBELA), must rely on “third-party analysis” and external definitions of the term “fossil fuel company,” Topping found. The working group findings, however, now adopted by the University, merely “invite” CBELA to “review its processes”. This review will be carried out in “reference [...] to the priorities set out in the

Inside ● Cambridge’s cultural borders pg. 13 ● In conversation with Mark Kermode pg. 26 ● History of night-climbing pg. 18


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.