WS_2009-2010
life long dream
studio project
prof. Daniel Dendra
equilibrium > at the edge of chaos
student Victoria Bradbrook
WS_2009-2010
studio project
prof. Daniel Dendra
student Victoria Bradbrook
state housing plans results are unsuccessful. “residents return to the slum to enjoy the social networks that had not factored in the design of modern housing...�
tension
proximity > individuality >
flocking organizative rules emergent behaviour applications in architecture
WS_2009-2010
emergent behaviour
studio project
prof. Daniel Dendra
student Victoria Bradbrook
flocking in birds, fish SOCIAL SYSTEM BOIDS SIMULATION
> autonomous agents who are
> part of a collective inteligence organizing
SOCIAL SYSTEM
“birds do not follow a coreography, but coreograph themselves”
> in a syncronized system with no previous order URBAN SIMULATION
self organized < group behaviour BOIDS
BOIDS SIMULATION
autonomous agents simulating flocking in birds and fish linked components in constant data exchange
BOID = bird + android
> complex adaptative behaviour to the site
spreepark berlin
WS_2009-2010
studio project
emergent behaviour
prof. Daniel Dendra
rules & translations to architecture
urban simulation
student Victoria Bradbrook
allowing spatial arrangements to emerge from the responsive interaction between agents (architectural components) and the environment
> self organized group behaviour
< complex adaptative behaviour to the site rules for site interaction
BOIDS
rules for group
> by borders
interaction
> separation
enclosing environment
desired minimum distance
> by obstacles
range of reaction
existing structure
¨if dist>3 and <10, steer¨
> cohesion
center of gravity according to mass value
> by attractors existing structure
> alignment
mantain average heading
range of attraction to objects
att0> 90
att1> 60
att2>50
att3>80
att4 >90
WS_2009-2010
urban simulation
studio project
prof. Daniel Dendra
rules & translations to architecture
> separation
student Victoria Bradbrook
> self organized group behaviour BOIDS
25 Separation range
200 Separation range
desired minimum distance
>
range of reaction
> >distances agents/units >microdistances ( minimized walk door to door distance)
¨if dist>3 and <10, steer¨
b
a
> cohesion
center of gravity according to mass value
>
b
c
c a
d
>
>distances between groups >diferentiation (a/b/c/d) > grouping factor / typologies
> alignment
mantain average heading
>
> >hourly shadows > solar incidence as allignment parameter
WS_2009-2010
urban simulation
studio project
prof. Daniel Dendra
iteration process
self organized group behaviour BOIDS
student Victoria Bradbrook
+ complex adaptative behaviour to the site +
(simulation based on flocking by Daniel Shiffman+Craig Reynold's Boids program to simulate the flocking behavior of birds + TOOL for circulation analysis by tudor cosmatu -based on the work of dimitrie stefanescu + kai tak emergence 0324 by Zhiping Liu)
(Spreepark Berlin)
WS_2009-2010
urban simulation
studio project
prof. Daniel Dendra
iteration process
student Victoria Bradbrook
WS_2009-2010
urban simulation
studio project
prof. Daniel Dendra
iteration process
student Victoria Bradbrook
complex adaptative behaviour to the site self organized group behaviour BOIDS
separation
1
2
4
6
3
5
att* att**
7
1
40
2
40
3
40
4
40
5
40
6
40
7
40
8
40
9
40
10 40
alignement
cohesion sepRATE
30 20 50/2>d>1 30 20 50/4>d>1 30 20 50/8>d>1 30 20 50/8>d>1 30 20 50/4>d>0.3 30 20 50/2>d>1 att* 5/ att** 15 30 20 50/4>d>0.3 att* 5/ att** 15 30 20 50/2>d>1 att* 3/ att** 13 30 20 50/4>d>0.3 att* 3/ att** 13 30 20 50/4>d>0.3 att* 1/ att** 11
d = distance of incidence
8
9
10
att* att** = addition of attracctors
30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30
WS_2009-2010
studio project
urban simulation
prof. Daniel Dendra
iteration process
student Victoria Bradbrook
complex adaptative behaviour to the site self organized group behaviour BOIDS
separation
11 80 11
12
13
alignement
cohesion sepRATE
30 20 50/4>d>0.3
60
30 20 50/4>d>0.3
60
att 90/att*90/att**50/att***80/att****90/att^30/att^^80
12 80
att 90/att*60/att**50/att***80/att****90/att^30/att^^80
13 80
30 20 50/4>d>0.3
60
att 90/att*60/att**50/att***80/att****90/att^30/att^^80
14 100
30 20 50/4>d>0.3
60
att 90/att*60/att**50/att***80/att****90/att^30/att^^80
14
15
16
15 40
30 20 50/4>d>0.3
30
30 20 50/4>d>0.3
80
30 20 50/4>d>0.3
100
att 90/att*60/att**50/att***80/att****90/att^30/att^^8
16 100 att att* att** att*** att**** att^ att^^
att 90/att*60/att**50/att***80/att****90/att^30/att^^8
17 150
att 90/att*60/att**50/att***80/att****90/att^70/att^^8
17
d = distance: radius of incidence att* att** = addition of attracctors
WS_2009-2010
urban simulation
studio project
prof. Daniel Dendra
shadowing analysis
student Victoria Bradbrook
height study according to shadowing
Even heights (1 floor, 3meters) sunpath from 9 to 10:30 - Dec 21
north alignement
44 units northeast alignement
142 units east alignement
height reacomodation according to northeast and east alignment density
west alignement
sunpath from14 to 15:30 - Dec 21
WS_2009-2010
urban simulation
studio project
prof. Daniel Dendra
shadowing analysis
student Victoria Bradbrook
height study according to shadowing
Uneven heights (3,7,9 mts) north alignement (3 mts)
north alignement (3 mts)
northeast alignement (3 mts)
northeast alignement (9 mts)
east alignement (3 mts)
east alignement 7 mts)
west alignement (3 mts)
west alignement (3 mts)
sunpath from 9 to 15:30 21 Dec 21 (uneven heights)
WS_2009-2010
urban simulation
studio project
prof. Daniel Dendra
shadowing analysis
height study according to shadowing
student Victoria Bradbrook