PORTFOLIO VERTIKA SRIVASTAV
Introduction Qualifications & Skillset
Passive House Institute-US (PHIUS) A Case Study from Washington DC, USA
Agenda
LEED ArcSkoru Feasibility A Case Study from Mumbai, India
Masters Capstone Project Retrofit of Aga Khan Academy
Achievements & Key Projects Academic & Professional
2
Hello!
I am Vertika Srivastav B. Arch. (Hons.) – Building Construction Technology, Apeejay Institute of Technology M.Tech.- Building Energy Performance, CEPT University 2 year work experience with TATA Consulting Engineers (Ecofirst)
LEED Green Associate | GRIHA Certified Professional | IGBC Accreditted Professional Membership: ASHRAE & IBPSA 3
3
Skillset
Energy Simulations OpenStudio | DesignBuilder | eQuest | EDSL TAS
Daylight & Artificial Lighting 185,244 users Simulations LightStanza | DiaLUX | Velux
Data Analysis & Presentation MS Office | Dview | Climate Consultant | Photoshop 4
Energy Simulation: OpenStudio Back Engine: EnergyPlus
Default
Boundary Conditions
Simulated: 15 Million SF
Construction
Thermal Zone 5
Energy Simulation: eQuest Back Engine: DOE-2
Simulated: 25 Million SF
6
Energy Simulation: DesignBuilder Back Engine: EnergyPlus
Simulated: 1 Million SF
7
Energy Simulation: EDSL TAS Back Engine: Tas Engineering
Simulated: 1 Million SF
8
Daylight & Artificial Light Simulation
DAYLIGHT GLARE PROBABILITY
SPATIAL DAYLIGHT AUTONOMY
TASK LIGHTING ILLUMINANCE
ANNUAL SUN EXPOSURE
EXTERNAL LIGHTING RENDER
DAYLIGHT FACTOR
AMBIENT LIGHTING ILLUMINANCE
9
1.
Passive House Institute US (PHI-US)
Approach and Analysis for an upcoming multifamily residence towards Net Zero Energy Building Neighborhood Development Company Washington DC, USA
10
Project Brief PROJECT INFORMATION
A
B
The project is a residential development by the Neighborhood Development, located in Washington D.C. As per ASHRAE 90.1-2016, the given city qualifies under climate zone 4A.
Idea
Innovation
Innovate Identify
Climate Zone 4A is perceived as mixed humid. Management
Increment Built Up Area = 49,826 SF Implement Improve
D
C
11
Sustainability Goals
12
Methodology 01 BASELINE ANALYSIS
1
Baseline Model created using ASHRAE 90.1-2016. Further results compared with Energy Star Portfolio Manager.
03 PARAMETRIC ANALYSIS
ELIMINATION PARAMETRICS 02 Input for all end uses were pushed to a near to zero value one at a time. Identification of energy intensive loads and target points for selection of optimum measures.
2
PROPOSED MEASURES 04 Best ECM bundle proposed to Client, Architect & MEP Team to finalize the scheme. Included integration & analysis of Solar PV
3
An iterative approach to select energy conservation measures (ECMs) best suited for the building
4 13
01 Baseline Analysis Overall End Use Breakdown
HVAC End use Breakdown
Interior Equipment 28%
3% 25% 30%
Interior Lighting 10%
HVAC 62%
42%
Cooling
Heating
Fans
Pumps 14
02 Elimination Parametrics Code
EP00
Description
EP01
EP00 Baseline Case (ASHRAE 90.1-2016)
EP02 Envelop (Wall, Roof, Window U Value EP01 EP03 & SHGC) ~ 0.01 Btu/hr SF Deg.F EP04
EP02 Interior Lighting as 0.01 W/SF
EP05 EP06
EP03 Interior Equipment as 0.01 W/SF
0
EP04 HVAC (Heat/Cool + Pump) off EP05 Interior Fans off
Interior Lighting Heating
EP06 Occupancy = 0 EP04
Maximum Impact
EP03
200000
EP02
EP06
400000 600000 Consumption (kWh) Interior Equipment Fans EP05
800000
Cooling Pumps EP01
Least Impact
15
FANS
HEAT/COOL
EQUIPMENT
LIGHTING
WINDOW SC
WINDOW U
WALL
Energy Conservation Measures (ECMs) Bundles R-38
ROOF
03 Parametric Analysis
R-49
U-0.9
0.27
30%
10%
COP-6
85%
R-30
R-40
U-1.2
0.33
50%
30%
COP 10
90%
R-23
R-30
U-1.5
0.47
10%
50%
COP-8
95%
16
03 Parametric Analysis 900000
800000 700000
Consumption (in kWh)
Code Iteration Description EADS000 ASHREA 90.1-2016 Baseline Optimized Envelope + 50% reduction in LPD over EADS001 baseline + Ground Source Heat Pump EADS001 + 30% reduction EADS002 in Interior Equipment over baseline EADS002 + Pump EADS003 efficiency as 95% EADS002 + 50% reduction in Interior Equipment over EADS004 baseline (Energy Star Equipment) EADS004 + COP EADS005 enhancement to 9 EADS005 + Solar PV Solar PV support (Proposed Case)
49% savings
600000 500000 400000 300000 200000 100000 0
EADS000 EADS001 EADS002 EADS003 EADS004 EADS005 Interior Lighting
Interior Equipment
Cooling
Heating
Fans
Pumps
17
04 Proposed Measures 60
Case
59.6
54.1
40
70% savings
50 67% savings
Energy use Intensity (kBTU/SF-yr)
70
30
Energy Use Intensity (kBTU/SF-yr.)
Business As Usual
59.6
ASHRAE 90.1 – 2016 Baseline
54.1
Threshold required for PHI-US
22
Proposed Case + Solar PV Integration
17.3
22 17.3
20 10 0 Business As Usual
ASHRAE Baseline
PHI-US
Proposed Case 18
2.
LEED Existing Building Operations & Maintenance (EBOM) v4.1 via Arc Unilever Mumbai, India
LEED ArcSkoru Feasibility 19
About LEED Arc Green Business Certification Inc. (GBCI) created Arc, and the company behind it, Arc Skoru Inc., to serve as the platform that you use to earn a LEED for Existing Buildings certification under the prescriptive LEED Performance Path. One of the main goals of Arc is to serve as a platform that tracks commercial buildings’ sustainability data regardless of whether a certification has the desired result.
20
Methodology Data Collection Project Study Project Registration
Analysis & Reporting Occupant Surveys Arc Data Template
21
Building Performance
22
Retrofit for Aga Khan Academy
3.
United Nations Hyderabad, India
Masters Capstone Project 23
Project Site
24
Project Methodology HDR IMAGERY
THERMAL IMAGERY
25
Retrofit Measures
26
Outcome
27
Awards & Recognitions
4.
Publications
Academic | Professional
Achievements 28
Academic Achievements •
Secured First Position in B.Arch. at Apeejay Institute of Technology (Class of 2016)
•
Secured First Position in US DOE Race to Zero Student Design Competition in Urban Single Family Category (Team Kill Bill). Team Lead: Documentation & Presentation Quality Team Co-Lead: Energy Analysis (Refer image, first row 3rd team member from the left)
Presented research papers: • Passive Low Energy Architecture (PLEA) 2018 at the Chinese University of Hong Kong •
Energy Efficiency Symposium 2017 by Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, USA (Remote Presentation)
•
Case Study Shortlisted in BS Rome 2019 29
Professional Achievements •
Team Lead for Energy, Daylight & Artificial Lighting Simulations
•
Nominated for Employee of the year in FY 2018-19
•
Nominated for TATA Value Awards in FY 2019-20
•
National Finalist for TATA Innovista Awards under Sustainability Impact Innovation Category
•
Upcoming publication “Zero has a Value” in TCE Expression Magazine for FY 19-20
30
Projects
5.
Clients
Engagements for Simulation Software Feedback Academic | Professional
Key Projects 31
Projects & Clientele Handled
Commercial
32
Simulation Software Feedback & Support
Energy Simulation
Thermal Simulation
Daylight Simulation
Instructor for Solar Decathlon India starting Summer 2020
Provide feedback & usability analysis for tool as per relevance for Indian Market
Explore latest metrics available for daylight and feedback.
Discussions underway
Assisted in software development in 2017. 33
‘’
“Always have a successful exit than a favorable entrance, because what matters is not being clapped when we arrive but being remembered when we leave!” 34
Thank You! Form follows Function Form follows Performance
Any questions? You can connect with me on srivastavvertika@gmail.com 35
35