How Unique was the Depositional Fingerprint of Tropical Storm Irene? A sedimentary reconstruction of Connecticut River flooding from Keeney Cove. Andrew Fallon1, Jonathan Woodruff1, Brian Yellen1, Laura Kratz1, Anna Martini2, John Gilbert1 1. Department of Geosciences, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, United States. 2. Department of Geology, Amherst College, Amherst, MA, United States
Irene’s Anomalous Deposition
Hydrologic Time-series, Hartford CT
Geomorphic Evolution of Keeney Cove
• Depositional layer identified by Be-7 in cores collected following Irene • Fine Grained, >95% clay, matched only by Glacial Varve sediments • Near Zero Mercury (Hg) levels • Low Organic material • High Potassium (K) levels • High Bulk Density
Quote from website: “Historian John Warner Barber’s sketch illustrated how radically the Connecticut River has changed its course over time. The solid line documents the river’s route just below Hartford in the 17th century, while the dashed line delineates the Connecticut’s path in 1836. The sharp turn in the earlier course formed what became Wethersfield Cove.”
40
Historic Peak Stage 1936 -‐>
35
<-‐ 1938
30
Irene
Feet
25 20 15 10 5 0 1800 1820 1840 1860 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000
30
Irene Flood Stage
25
Feet
20
Irene layer ~1.52 cm
Flood Stage
15 10
Telephone pole with high water marks for historic floods, next to the Old Lyme Ferry, New London CT
5 0
Glacial Lake Hitchcock 15 kya, ‘X’ marks present day Keeney Cove
Current path of the Connecticut River and Keeney Cove (red)
http://hpi.wethersfieldct.com/index.cgi/1146? section=history
Depth DepthProfiles Profilesfor forKC1 KC1Coring CoringSite Site
Above: Shallow core showing the flood deposit layer, extracted 56 days after Irene
xray (grayscale) xray (grayscale) 0
0
0
Irene (2011 AD) Irene (2011 AD)
K (int) K (int) 0
0
percent >38 um percent >38 um 0
0
Site comparison of X-radiographs & Hg Levels
Hg (ppb) Hg (ppb) 0
0
Cs-137 (Bq/g) Cs-137 (Bq/g) 0
0
0
Sediment Discharge from Tropical Storm Irene into Long Island Sound
Keeney Cove Bathymetry
0 1
0 260
20 280
40 300
60 320
80
100
(m) 120
5
8
Depth (m)
100 100
200 200
200 200
200 200
200 200
200 200
300 300
300 300
300 300
300 300
300 300
400 400
400 400
400 400
400 400
400 400
400 400
500 500
500 500
500 500
500 500
500 500
500 500
600 600
600 600
600 600
600 600
600 600
600 600
300 300
GPR Transect shown below
140
160
180
200
220
240
Historic River channel
1955 AD Flood 1955 AD Flood 1938 AD Flood 1938AD ADFlood Flood 1938 1938 AD Flood 1891 AD Flood 1891 AD Flood
3.38 3.36 3.34 3.32 3.3 3.38 3.36 3.34 3.32 3.3 4 x 10 4 x 10
Abstract:
4
7
100 100
KC1 Coring site
3
6
100 100
1900 AD Sph.N. 1900 AD Sph.N.
Current channel
2
100 100
Depth (cm) Depth (cm)
GPR Seismic analysis of Keeney Cove shows, through changes in lithology, the depth and profile of the Historic Connecticut River Bed as well as the transition to incised glacial varve sediments.
100 100
Depth (cm) Depth (cm)
Ground Penetrating Radar
100 100 3 -1 737 s C AD s-1 196363 AD C 19 -13737 s C ADD Cs-1 4 5 9 1 54 A 200 19 200
0
0
1000 2000 3000 4000 1000 2000 3000 4000
The results presented for this sedimentary reconstruction from Keeney Cove, an abandoned cut off meander formed during the spring flood of 1683 or 1692, are from a 550 cm core. The stratigraphic profile begins with varved sediments from Glacial lake Hitchcock overlain by an unconformity designating previous river channel incision into these glacial deposits. Following the sandy river sediment is a gradual change to low energy lake deposits, showing the gradual closing of the upriver inlet into the lake. Inorganic and notably dense deposits frequently interbed the upper mud facies which, coincide with past flood events on the Connecticut. The resultant sedimentation from Irene is apparent within cores collected immediately following the event, with detectable Be-7 found within the sediments.
0
0
50 50
100 100
0
0
200 400 600 800 200 400 600 800
Why Was Irene so Unique?
0
0
0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08
Typical flood events are characteristic of high grain size deposits, however Irene is uniquely fine grained, >95% clay, matched only by underlying glacial varve sediments. Further distinctive characteristics of Irene are determined through XRF analyses for elemental abundance. Particularly, peak Potassium concentrations that are only matched by the stratigraphically lower glacial sediments. Hg concentrations within the Irene deposit are close to zero, highly contrasting the underlying concentrations of ~270 ppb. The Hg concentrations of other flood deposits will be presented to assess drops in heavy metal concentrations over time. Presented results will include a core transect to determine a spatial analysis of deposition within Keeney Cove. Specific causes for the distinctive sedimentary fingerprint for the Irene flooding will be discussed.
• • • • •
Concentrated rainfall Dam influence Change in land sensitivity Preservation Local morphologic change
Precipitation Aug27-28, 2011