Issue 115

Page 1

Vision York Student

Ikon & Diva the home of Cheese and Crackers

ILLEGAL EXAM CAUSES OUTRAGE

DEGREE RESULTS of Economics finalists are currently in jeopardy after an exam completed may now be declared illegal. Students sitting the Micro-economics 2 exam earlier this year were alarmed to discover that the results they had been awarded were unconfirmed owing to confusion over the validity of the exam. A member of the economics staff claimed “The exam was clearly ‘illegal’, because not formally approved.”

“The intention was that it would be dealt with confidentially. I deeply regret the leak.” Prof. Keith Hartley Economics Board of Studies Chair

The exam was based upon an Italian system of marking where the paper is marked out of 120, yet those gaining 100 marks would still be awarded 100%. The intention of this structure was to compensate the students for having to answer four compulsory essay questions (as opposed to the previous system that involved a choice of four from twelve). Students have not been officially informed that their marks are in the balance, but confidential information was leaked to students after a recent board of studies meeting. Professor Keith Hartley, Chairman of the Board told Vision: “The Micro2 item on the agenda at the last Board of Studies meeting (10th November) was starred for further discussion. The intention was that it would be dealt with confidentially. As chair of that meeting I deeply regret that information has been leaked and has caused anxiety and uncertainty amongst students.”

“When I referred to the exam as illegal, there were no objections” J. Long, PPE Board of Studies Rep. “When asked whether or not the original exam structure was illegal he said, it depends on how you define the word structure, the Micro 2 exam was approved. I am very reluctant to say much more in case of enflaming the situation.” James Long, Board of Studies PPE representative commented “I raised the subject at the Board of Studies meeting on Wednesday week 6. When I referred to the exam as illegal there

WIN tickets to New York p.11

were certainly no objections from those members of staff from the Economics department.” On behalf of PPE students he has submitted a letter to the University Teaching Committee (UTC) explaing that “It would be a humiliation to ourselves and the university for us to write back to prospective employers to which we have applied and inform them of a change in our results, due to what appears to be incompetence within the economics department. The lack of information provided to students has caused anxiety amongst many that sat the exam, as final degree classifications may rest on this one mark. One third year economics student said “I have heard lots of rumours that we may have to re-sit or that our marks are going down by as much as 20%, this is the last thing we need in our final year.” Professor Hartley said “As a department we asked the examinations committee for guidance who then saw it fit to pass the matter on to the UTC. We are currently waiting for their feed-

“I have heard rumours that our marks may be lowered by as much as 20%, that is the last thing we need as finalists” Economics student, 3rd Year

back.” Professor Jim Matthew, Chairman of the UTC, that oversees academic conduct commented “We are looking into the matter and will be giving advice to the department, examining what the possible procedures may be. This could include the involvement of external examiners.” But one PPE finalist argued that the way students have not been told of this situation is totally unprofessional. “It’s not fair for us to suffer from a fault of the department. It was only a couple of weeks before we sat the exam that that the structure was confirmed. When the subjects was raised the lecturer was particularly evasive. Because of the structure of the exam we were told we wouldn’t have to complete all the questions to get a good grade. It was implied that the extra twenty marks on the paper were for those who wanted an extra challenge.” One lecturer who asked to remain anonymous told Vision that the University may have administered an illegal exam. He added: “If the marks are then changed it would be possible for students to New take & legal action against the Claire Rajini Vaidyanathan

Fighting talk p.21

York Student Vision

PINOCHET ELECTED HONORARY PRESIDENT

GENERAL PINOCHET, the former Chilean Head Of State, has been elected honorary President of York University’s Debating Society. The former dictator is currently embroiled in a fight against extradition to Spain where he is accused of crimes against humanity. Jonathan Williams, joint Chair of the Debating Society, told Vision that the appointment was not intended as any political statement. “It was just a bit of comedy,” he explained. “When Pinochet was nominated no one really expected him to be elected. In fact several members of the society were horrified – which seemed to amuse the rest.” Asked whether he expected a reaction from Spanish or Chilean foreign students, Mr

Williams answered “If they come along they’ll see that we’re really not political at all. He wasn’t nominated because of his politics or beliefs but because he has successfully debated his way through more than anyone else we could think of.” The story has been investigated by The Times newspaper, who mistakenly understood that General Pinochet had been elected honorary president of the Student Union. Speaking on behalf of the SU, Aidhean Campbell said “The appointment might be a little tasteless. He may have done some great things for his country but Pinochet’s still seen as a massmurderer by many.” General Pinochet has yet to be informed of his new office.

Ben Hulme-Cross

Interview with Oakenfold p.23

4th December, 1999 Issue 115


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.