Design Portfolio 2015-2019
Varoon C. Kelekar varoon.kelekar@yale.edu 860.849.7312
C N E T
O T N S .
2 Architectural Design 4
Heima Cohabitation Spring 18’ | YSOA
26
The Burrow: Biostation Fall 18’ | YSOA
48
Floodscape: Ferry Terminal Fall 17’ | YSOA
66
Kuan Pu Elementary School Professional Practice | Fieldoffice Architects
86 Architectural Planning 88
Commoning The Roman Agro Spring 19’ | YSOA
108
An Analogous Street Spring 15’ | KRVIA
124
Elm Street District Re-development Professional Practice | Yale Urban Design Workshop
138
Resilient By Design Professional Practice | Urban Ecology and Design Lab
152 Detailing & Fabrication 154
Pincrest House CD Set Professional Practice | Jacobschang Architecture
162
Kasauli Housing CD Set Professional Practice | Studio Mumbai
176
Fur Chase Fall 17’ | YSOA
180
Ornamenting The Transition Spring 19’ | YSOA
1
A R C E C T L D GN .
H I T UR A E S I
Heima Cohabitation
Spring 2018 | YSOA Location: Reykjavík, Iceland Critics: Hildigunnur Sverrisdóttir, Kyle Dugdale
5
The economic crisis of 2008 in Iceland left the city of Reykjavík with a dearth of cheap housing for the city’s young population. The Heima Collaborative proposes a co-housing strategy to accommodate the city’s disposed youth and to facilitate them with shared workspaces for starting small scale businesses. The project drives its diagram from a traditional house in Reykjavík which encompasses varying scales of spaces shared between family members, neighbors, and citizens of the larger metropolis. Individual beds, rooms, and houses cluster around these shared spaces to facilitate opportunities for social interaction and spaces for collective labor. The project is sited along the city’s waterfront which over the last decade has transformed into a spectacle of residential highrises aiming to redefine the cities image. The proposal is a culmination of individual housing units stacked along a public spine. The spine provides opportunities for interactions as well as defines spaces for shared productive and reproductive labor. The project re-imagines the realm of a private household as property owned in common by a group of people. A concrete framed core supports collective functions of the household whereas private spaces for leisure and contemplation extend beyond the framed structure. The building section achieves a distinct spacial transition as one navigates a series of volumetric variations which define various thresholds. The building elevations display the inherent organization of the individual units, each with its distinct identity. The rhythm of the elevational members is a derivative of the anthropological dimension making the most private spaces of the household. The individual pods function as extended windows providing for spaces to dwell and reconnect with the distant landscape.
1
2
1
3
1
2
2
1
1. To be 2. To be neighbors 3. To be citizens
7
Scale Diagram - Shared Space
8
9
10
11
4
3
2
1
0
1. 2. 3. 4.
5m
Co-working spaces Community kitchen Store Reading room
12
First Floor Plan
3
2
1
1
1
0
5m
1. Shared appartments 2. Play area 3. Music studio
13
Second Floor Plan
14
Skulagata Street Elevation
15
Building Section - West East
16
17
18
19
20
Frakkastigur Street Elevation - Entrance
21
22
Detailed Section - Private Pod/ Facade
24
25
26
The Burrow Biostation
Fall 2018 | YSOA Location: Playa Grande, Costa Rica Critics: Julie Snow, Michael Schlabs Awarded: Retrospecta Publication
27
The project builds on the work done by the Leatherback Trust towards the protection and conservation of the Leatherback Sea Turtles and proposes a marine biology station. The Burrow: biology station is a meandering mix of research labs, scientist and staff residences and a public educational corridor which together aim for the preservation of the diverse flora and fauna found in the Las Baulas national park. The site is located within the district of Guanacaste in Costa Rica. An area covered with temperate Savanna forests which are largely dependent on seasonal rainfall. Water conservation becomes the primary concern of architecture as the district is severely affected by droughts. The project evolves as a series of sectional interventions along the northern slope. Landscape modifications aim to alter the site to embed architecture within the earth and to harbor systems of water harvesting. Also, these cisterns perform as actants of passive climate control within the building. The project is built in two distinct formal and material languages and uses this inherent dichotomy to create spacial segregation within the program. Large open research labs are embedded within the ground and facilitate maximum passive ventilation while the residential units are raised to create places of solitude amidst the forest foliage. The roofs of the research buildings act as a mere extension of the landscape and help harvest rainwater within the building. A visitors trail meanders around the building through a poche of trees, concrete columns and wooden posts. Programs like public classrooms and event spaces are located along the outdoor trail which offers occasional glances into inner workings of the bio station.
29
30
31
1 2 3 4 5 6
SITE PLAN SCALE 1:1000
0
50m
32
Site Plan
1
Trail
2
3
Foyer
Library
4
Gallery
Archive
Research
5
Stay
Harvest
Lab
6
34
35
4
4 3
2
1
0
1. 2. 3. 4.
5m
Reception Shop Canteen Outdoor classrooms
36
First Floor Plan
4
3 3
3 2
1
1
0
1. 2. 3. 4.
5m
Wet labs Library/ Archives Staff residences Outdoor classrooms
37
Second Floor Plan
38
39
40
41
Section - Research Laboratories
42
43
Section - Internal Circulation
44
45
46
47
Section - Staff Residences
48
Floodscape Ferry Terminal
Fall 2017 | YSOA Location: New York, USA Team: Jen Shin, Varoon Kelekar Critics: Leslie Gill, Mike Jacobs Awarded: Retrospecta Publication
49
The Regional Planning Association [RPA] has marked the Rockaway Peninsula under immediate threat from storm surge and global sea-level rise. The project explores the ability for architecture to participate in the reciprocal process with nature to restore the health of Rockaway and Jamaica Bay. Historically, Jamaica Bay has been a wetland composed of tiny marsh islands with native vegetation which acted as a buffer between the mainland and the sea. Timely events of land reclamation and dredging have severely impacted the health of the bay and reduced its ability to perform as a natural barrier. The RPA has recommended a complete withdrawal of human habitation from the peninsula to adapt for the future. In response to the current scenario, the ferry terminal is conceived as a series of jetties along the bay edge. The jetties break the existing hard edge condition to help restore wetlands by allowing natural sediment deposition to occur. Additionally, a water corridor along Beach 108 Street helps in the strategic flooding of the island during storm events. Thus, the proposed landscape becomes a catalyst for wetland restoration. The program of the ferry terminal is bolstered with civic spaces and estuary laboratories that provide a place for people of myriad backgrounds - scientists, citizens, environmentalists, planners - to come together to envision a new future for the Rockaway Peninsula. The architecture emerges as stone jetties from the landscape and performs as a live edge for the flow of water, people, critters and plants. This vision for the future is both optimistic but also grounded in the reality of climate change. The project aspires to both recover and reinvent the story of humans and nature on the Rockaway Peninsula.
2069: Jamaica Bay, NY
Site
51
Image Source: Regional Planning Association
1880
Present
52
Proposed: Soft edge
Proposed: Wetland, water corridor
53
Aquaculture
Wooden reinforcement
Oyster beds
54
Recreation parks
Salt marshes
Stone barriers
Aquaphonics
55
Bird sanctuary
Masterplan - Wetland
56
57
2017 PROGRAM EVOLUTION
CIVIC SPACES
FERRY PROGRAM LOW TIDE
LABORATORIES
HIGH TIDE
2030: 1’ Sea level rise
2080 PROGRAM EVOLUTION 3'-6' PROJECTED WATER LEVEL RISE
CIVIC SPACES
FERRY PROGRAM
LABORATORIES
LOW TIDE +4'
HIGH TIDE +4'
2080: 4-6’ Sea level rise
Civic space Ferry terminal Climate laboratories
58
59
Controlled Flooding Diagrams
6
6
4
DN
DN DN
DN
3 2
1
5
5
0
50ft
60
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6.
Foyer Exhibition space Public auditorium Ferry terminal Classrooms Laboratory
61
Left: First Floor Plan
62
63
64
65
66
Kuan Pu Elementary School
Junior Architect | Fieldoffice Architects Location: Hsinchu, Taiwan Team: Ja-Scheng Chen, Su-Su, Varoon Kelekar Personal Involvement: Schematic Design and Design Development Status: Built
67
Within the last decade, the city of Hsinchu in Taiwan has experienced major urbanization of its suburban periphery due to a growing IT sector. The architecture of the elementary school envisions the site as a green oasis acting as a deliberate relief from the rapidly urbanizing sprawl. The design for the elementary school was evolved through a rigorous process of physical modeling at incremental scales. These models formed the basis of all design decisions within the office and were the tools for discussions with the various government officials, academicians, MEP consultants and landscape designer who collaborated on the project. The site is located at the intersection of two major urban corridors. The project embraces the city’s dilemma and envisions the school as a large green thoroughfare with a central playground. Classrooms are organized around intermediate courtyards which set the ground for children to learn, meander and play. These courtyards are programmed uniquely for varying age groups with basketball courts, plantation fields, playgrounds, etc. and provide a safe place for play and other extracurricular activities. Individual classrooms are organized in groups of two that repeat around the cluster. Paved wooden flooring extends from within the classrooms into shared spaces which accommodates spillover programs like pottery and other crafts. These shared spaces are subsequently connected by a wide semi-enclosed corridor that can be programmed for various events which extend the realm of learning spaces into the landscape. The Kuan Pu elementary school acts as a respite where education extends seamlessly from formal classrooms to informal spaces under shaded trees.
0
25m
69
Site Plan
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
Vehicular Street Section - Western Edge
77
Pedestrian Street Section - Eastern Edge
0
10m
78
Classroom Reading/ study cubical Shared workspace Teachers cubical Washroom
79
Left: Ground Floor Plan - Lower Grade
80
81
82
83
84
85
ARC E C T L P N I N
H U L G
I T RA AN .
88
Commoning The Roman Agro
Spring 2019 | YSOA Location: Roman Agro, Italy Team: Gus Steyer, Varoon Kelekar Critics: Pier Vittorio Aureli, Emily Abruzzo
89
Fosso di San Giuliano is a settlement near the Easternmost border of the Roman municipality. The settlement is sparsely populated with around 2,100 inhabitants spread over an area of around 0.65 km2. The toponimo largely comprises of residential plots and vacant land. The denser residential areas lie towards the Eastern and Southern ends of the settlement, while vacant lots are more prevalent along the Northern and Western borders. There is also a small industrial quarter along the Via Polense. Few people both live and work in Fosso di San Giuliano, and there is little interest in developing public infrastructures like groceries, schools, and other civic spaces. Meanwhile, the settlement contains vacant or underutilized lots sometimes occupied by transient Romani groups. We propose to densify the settlement to provide a critical mass for building social infrastructure. This is done by modifying the existing property walls and commoning vacant lots to provide live-work spaces in the settlement. A block is restructured as a collective property of 5 households that choose to engage in a common occupation. The commoners construct a simple roof and service block referred to as a “Portico Shed” – that can be further built into by incoming residents. On the Eastern side, we recognize opportunities for horticultural commoning within the restructured blocks. Here, the “Portico Sheds” can be turned into residences or workplaces for produce preparation. Whereas towards the relatively unoccupied Western edge, we propose small scale manufacturing commons. Here, vacant lots are leased to construct capannone – or industrial sheds – with accompanying residences. As revenue from the leased lots accumulates, larger public programs comprising of two Portico Sheds are built along the East-West spines of the settlement. Whereas the North-South roads alternate between vehicular streets and paved pedestrian streets around which the residential sheds are rebuilt over time.
0
100m
91
Existing Condition
92
93
0
5m
Existing Condition
94
Horticultural Block
0
5m
Phase 1: First lot commoned - residential shed, vegetable gardens
95
Horticultural Block
96
0
5m
Phase 2: Final lot commoned - public amenity, residential shed, cereal crops
97
Horticultural Block
0
5m
Existing condition
98
Industrial Manufacturing Block
0
5m
Phase 1: First capannone and residential shed built
99
Industrial Manufacturing Block
100
0
5m
Phase 2: Second capannone and residential shed built
101
Industrial Manufacturing Block
Existing Condition
0
50m
Phase 1: Residential and horticultural sheds constructed on commoned lots
Public programs Work sheds Residential porticoes Pedestrian paths
102
Sector Strategy
Phase 2: Capannone and residential sheds built on vacant lots
0
50m
Phase 3: Pedestrian streets and public sheds built along the central spine
Public programs Work sheds Residential porticoes Pedestrian paths
103
Sector Strategy
104
BUSHES
ORCHARD/ FRUIT TREES
OLIVE TREE
CYPRESS
PINE (2 Types) GARDEN
105
106
4
2
1
3
5
0
150m
Public programs Work sheds Residential porticoes Pedestrian paths
107
Site Strategy
108
The Analogous Street
Undergraduate Thesis 2014-15 | KRVIA Location: Mumbai, India Critics: Kalpit Ashar, Kaiwan Mheta Awarded: Design Dissertation Gold Medal, Citation
109
The project challenges the increasingly utilitarian [vehicular centric] nature of urban streetscape in Mumbai and suggests an alternative proposal for re-designing the existing water pipeline corridor. The proposal introduces a new genre of connections that disseminate through the city and provide for a place to be, interact and learn. Through adaptive reuse, a 15km [9.3miles] defunct water pipeline corridor is developed as a self-sustaining “green artery” for the city. Each intervention along the length of the corridor is a unique programmatic mix relating precisely to its surrounding context. Programs of social welfare and resilience are located amidst dense residential neighborhoods while larger civic and educational institutions are planned near major transportation hubs of the city. The corridor locates its agricultural research institute within the rapidly commercializing precinct of Marol. Doubling up as educational park, the building connects the two opposing urban typologies - one vertical and consolidated [commercial] and the other horizontal and dispersed [residential] with the metro station. Over time, a series of separate buildings are introduced on-site, each with a distinct design identity consistent with its function. Floating sections of the defunct pipeline and a recovered water corridor help guide the visitors along the site as they are offered occasional glimpses into the working of the research institute. The building of the research institute rises tall to mark the corridor’s presence. The overall scheme reflects the diversity and idiosyncrasies of the city. The project relies on ambiguity and performs simultaneously as an institute, a thoroughfare, and a recreational center. The series of planned interventions provide a platform that can accommodate all the events of the larger city.
Tulsi pipeline corridor
Powai lake
Western expressway
Western railway
Jogeshwari Vikhroli link road
Andheri Kurla metro road
Santacruz Chembur link road
Mithi river
111
112
113
Urban natural geography management center
Demonstration park for urban agricultural sciences
Vertical greenhouses/ pre-schools
Metro station/ farmers market
Sewage treatment plant/ flood buffers
Wetland trails/ film media park
114
115
Proposed Corridor - Part Models
116
117
Left: Program Diagram Demonstration Park: Urban Agricultural Sciences
119
Metro corridor
0
Entrance plaza
Auditorium/ exhibition gallery
Organic cafe
10m
120
Temporary market
Green roof corridor
Administrative wing
Aquaculture pond
Research labs processing and packing units aqua culture labs plant growth rooms
Plant nursery
121
Hovering walkway
Plantation fields
Top: First Floor Plan Bottom: Building Section - South North
0
10m
122
Top: Building Section - West East Bottom: Building Section - East West
123
Elm Street District Re-Development
Student Fellow | Yale Urban Design Workshop Location: New Haven, USA Team: Angela Lufkin, Varoon Kelekar Status: Under Implementation
125
The Yale Urban Design Workshop was contracted by the New Haven City Planning Commission for developing a zoning plan for the four blocks around Elm Street. We used this opportunity to revitalize the area as a mixed-use downtown district and provide a wide range of residential typologies. Elm Street is an exemplar of New haven’s early 19th-century architecture. The section under consideration displays a collection of Federal-style houses and heavy brick architecture with ornate detailing as a marker of the cities rich history. Presently the area is sparsely developed with a few boutique stores, parking lots and large commercial outposts that lie in close adjacency with the historic buildings. The proposal seeks to define the local identity of the district by preserving and enhancing the presence of the historic structures. Strategies for sensitive development are suggested by regulating the heights of adjacent structures and proposing a raised mid-block crossing which unites the historic houses across the street and helps slow down traffic at the intersection. Elm Street is revitalized as a local shopping district and a new streetscape design is proposed to support urban living, walkability, bikeability and lively frontages. The adjoining blocks are subdivided into smaller parcels using interblock connections. Parking is rationalized and consolidated into central structures to increase efficiency and to create usable interblock open spaces. A rich diversity of housing typologies are opened for market development which caters to a diverse group of incoming residents. Additional commercial studios located within the block help activate the internal open spaces. Thus ensuring that the Elm street district opens up as a lively connector between downtown New Haven and the State Street station.
0
100ft
Proposed preservation Proposed redevelopment
127
Existing Condition
128
129
Shopping district on Broadway
Farmington Canal Greenway
New Haven Green
Proposed local shopping district
Proposed residential redevelopment
State street station
130
Street bulbouts
Street trees, signages and way findings, signature lighting
Dedicated bike lane
Raised mid-block crossing
State street green way
0
100ft
131
Historic buildings Parking Retail Apartments Town houses
132
Design Diagrams
35 ft
65 ft
Double Loaded
22 ft
Single Loaded
80 ft
40 ft
40 ft
Town House
Loft Building
Parking Retail Apartments Town houses
133
Residential Typologies
Parking Retail Apartments Hospitality
134
0
100ft
Pedestrian entrances Vehicular entrances
135
Site Plan - Proposed
136
137
Bay Area: Resilient By Design
Student Fellow | Urban Ecology and Design Location: Marin City, USA Team: Samantha Monge, Varoon Kelekar Status: Partial Implementation
139
The project involved working with the Permaculture and Social Equity Team (P+SET) on formulating a social design process to build community capacity and eco-literacy to address the challenges of coastal adaptation and resilience planning in Marin City, CA. Marin City located along the Richardson bay has experienced server flooding caused by major climate events within the last decade. The county is a site of residence for low-income groups and African American communities and has been historically undeserved with inadequate infrastructure for disaster management and resilience. Climate change poses a serious threat of migration onto the community. Our team developed a curriculum and produced the required set of maps and drawings to inform resident groups on assessing and addressing issues of stormwater management and sea-level rise. We worked with the community to propose near and long term strategies which aimed to fill the gap between large scale infrastructure investment and local initiative. The resultant plan represented the needs and aspirations of the local communities and was called the “People’s Plan”. Tools were developed to teach the community about various permaculture elements that could be deployed strategically along the section of the county. Uphill strategies emphasized breaking down the flow of groundwater runoff and increasing infiltration. While the low lands were reimagined as floodable landscapes to harvest and store excess water. The Freeway 101 was proposed as an elevated dike against the rising seawater. The project culminated in partial implementation of the “People’s Plan” a model that could be replicated in various forms on different sites along the Bay Area.
NAPA
SONOMA SOLANO
CONTRA COSTA
MARIN
SAN FRANCISCO
Indicators include populations or households which are: 1. Renters 2. Under 5
ALAMEDA
3. 75 and over 4. Very low income 5. Without a vehicle 6. Communities of Color 7. Housing cost burdened
SAN MATEO
8. Limited English Speaking 9. Transportation cost burdened
Basin
10. Without a high school degree *Adapting to Rising Tides BCDC SANTA CLARA
NUMBER OF INDICATORS: 3-4
0
5-6
7+
5mi
Areas on the map colored dark green and blue (5+ vulnerability indicators) are the priority regions for implementing the CPP in consideration of the following conditions: The local community invites in such a process the recognition of need for support in addressing the chronic stressors and acute shock events affecting local resilience (including location of affordable housing, food insecurity, inequitable treatment by law enforcement, etc).
141
Existing resilience initiatives from within the com-
Location Map - Risk Indicators
142
143
Fire Department
SUB BASINS
LEVEE
Martin Luther King Jr. Academy
Exis Sea
10
9 1
1 8
6 5
7 4
WALDO
3
2
500 FT
0
500ft 1000 FT
Highgroundwatergroundwater 1 1. High
reported a few6. 2. feet Mud flow ground surface in im- 7. below projects at the school 8. 3. provement Flooding overflow Philips Drive and Drake 9. Av 4. between Pipe overspill 5. Overland flooding 10.
2
Unmaintained5Ditch Overland flooding- at the foothill of Sinking land Burgess Court floowater has been Ponding observed to run along the stariway parallel to the 24� CMP that drains Flooding Unmanaged drainDrake outlet Av during storms
Mud Flow 6
3
Flooding overflow
144
Unmaintained ditch- parallel to Dutton Court causes overflown floodwater on the properties along Drake Ave
8
Ponding- recurring flooding issues reported at the intersection of the US 101 off ramp. (Jan. 22, 2017 most lanes flooded within 5 hours)
9
Flooding- at apartment complexes
near Watershed the intersectionand of Donahue St Plan Existing Drainage and Drake Ave
A
Existing Building in 6 Ft Sea Level Rise
Proposed Bioengineering /
“Green” Street
between Philips Drive and Drake Av Plantings 2
Mud Flow
3
Flooding overflow
4
Overspill at pipe inlet
5
Overland flooding- at the foothill of Burgess Court floowater has been observed to run along the stariway parallel to the 24” CMP that drains Drake Av during storms
6
Unmaintained ditch- parallel to Dutton Court causes overflown floodwater on the properties along Drake Ave
7
Sinking land- reported over the years under the apartment buildings southeast of Terners Drive
8
Ponding- recurring flooding issues reported at the intersection of the US 101 off ramp. (Jan. 22, 2017 most lanes flooded within 5 hours)
9
Flooding- at apartment complexes near the intersection of Donahue St and Drake Ave
10
Pipe drainage onto housboat community
F
Marin Gateway Shopping Center
Martin Luther King Jr. Academy
Churches
C D
Fire Department
E
NATIONAL PARK BOUNDARY WALDO
LEVEE
B
DRAINAGE PIPES
SUB BASINS
LIQUEFACTION RISK
3 FT WATER LEVEL RISE
1
RAINFALL INDUCED LANDSLIDE
A
RETENTION BASIN
INFRASTRUCTURE
0
500ft
A. B. C. D. E. F.
WATER
Creek, trail and heritage orchard restoration Diversion drain
Creek,resiliency Trail &hub Heritage Orchard Restoration A Community
Detention basin and bioswales As just one example of similar erosion gullies across the Openspace restoration watershed, Ecological park the site behind building 69 is a perfect place to start. Halfway up the hillside to the ridge, the land is owned by the GGNRA, an ideal site to begin partnership and co-management of the watershed.
A combination of habitat restoration, creek cleanup, erosion gully brush plugs, and small check dams will slow storm water and reduce silt. An adjacent heritage orchard can be
D
145
Donahue Street Recreation/Drainage Corridor A site of some of the most common flooding issues as well as the primary road through town, Donohue has many opportunities to showcase strategies that can be replicated in various locations around Marin City.
Proposed Infrastructure andthere Permaculture Between Donohue and the baseball field, is an open space of approximately 30,000 square feet that can be converted into a small detention basin/bioswale. This can be connected to receive runoff from the field as well as the
Plan
Check Dam
Native Planting
Bioswale
Composting
Downspouts & Raingarden System
PHASE 1
PHASE 2
Brush Layerfill
Native Planting
Roof Water Dra
Rain Gardens
PHASE 3
Infiltration Z
Infiltration Tre
PHASE 4
146
Uphill Strategies
Roof Water Drainage
Mound
Composting
Raingarden System
Live Smiles
Sand Dunes
Check Dam & Bioswale
Roof Water Drainage Infiltration Zone
Rain Gardens
Infiltration Zone
Check Dam
Habitat Restoration Bioswale
Infiltration Trench
Composting
Levee
Sand Dunes
147
Lowland Strategies
148
Top: Habitat Restoration Bottom: Resiliency Hub
149
Top: Detention Basin/ Bioswale Bottom: Ecological Park
150
Existing Condition - Freeway 101
151
Proposed Dike - Freeway 101
D I F A
E N A T
T G B I
A I L & R I C ON .
Pinecrest House CD Set
Architectural Intern | Jacobschang Architecture Location: Pinecrest, USA Team: Mike Jacobs, Varoon Kelekar Personal Involvement: Construction Documents Status: Under Construction
155
Top Left to Bottom Right: Kitchen Details, Stair Details, Bathroom Details, Power Plan, Interior Elevations, Wall Type Details
156
Image Courtesy: Jacobschang Architecture
157
0
10ft
158
First Floor Construction Plan
0
10ft
159
First Floor Reflected Ceiling Plan
161
Top Left: Exterior Elevation - South Left: Building Sections - West East Right: Detailed Section - Footing/ Slab
Kasauli Housing CD Set
Architectural Intern | Studio Mumbai Location: Kasauli, India Team: Vrinda Seksaria, Varoon Kelekar Personal Involvement: Construction Documents and Administration Status: Built
163
0
50ft
164
0
50ft
165
Unit Plans
166
167
0
50ft
168
Unit Plan - Master Bedroom
0
10ft
169
Top: Electrical Layout Bottom: Plumbing Layout
170
Section - Living Room
171
Detail - Bay Window
172
Right Top to Bottom: Columns, Truss Systems, Ceiling Boarding, Wall Plaster
174
175
Image Source: amayahouse.com
Fur Chaise
Spring 2018 | YSOA Elective: The Chair Critics: Timothy Newton Status: Built
177
178
179
Moulded fiberglass reinforced polyester seat shell with internal shag fabric-covered foam upholstery supported on tubular steel frame
Ornamenting The Transition
Spring 2019 | YSOA Elective: Ornament Theory and Design Critics: Kent Bloomer Status: Built
181
182
183
Gold painted concrete door frame cast in a 3D printed formwork
185
186