FEATURE:
p.54
A match made in heaven?
FEATURE:
Jayson Westbury
Perfecting tailored products
Chief Executive of the Australian Federation of Travel Agents
ESSENTIAL READING FOR TRAVEL & HEALTH INSURANCE PROFESSIONALS
Winter sports travellers reluctant to disclose conditions According to the results of new research exclusively revealed to ITIJ, nearly half of British travellers planning on heading on a winter sports holiday are reticient when it comes to disclosing medical conditions to their insurers
p.74
NOVEMBER 2018 • ISSUE 214
FOS upholds four in 10 TI complaints According to an investigation by Which? Travel in the UK, in 2017 the Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS) upheld more complaints related to travel insurance than to any other major type of insurance
These travellers believe that travel insurance would be prohibitively expensive if they declared their pre-existing medical conditions, or that they would struggle to obtain coverage at all. Travel tech provider Aquarium Software, which commissioned the research, has advised that travel insurers need to make it a less daunting proposition for customers to disclose these medical conditions; after all, we in the industry are all too aware of the problems that can result when such important information is kept secret. “Non-disclosure of medical conditions is a significant problem for the insurance industry, because people feel they will be unfairly penalised for telling the truth,” said Aquarium’s Managing Director Ed Shropshire. “Others genuinely forget past conditions or mistakenly think they are not relevant, and rumours [however inaccurate] that some insurers may try to dodge paying legitimate claims does not help. It is perhaps human nature to put a sheen on the truth in certain situations, but travel insurance is one area where the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth pays in the long-term –
CONTINUED ON PAGE 6
US airlines face lawsuits over travel insurance add-ons The airlines, Delta and JetBlue, are also accused of receiving ‘kickbacks’, as they supposedly receive a share of the profits from
PROFILE:
Made to measure
Looking at the relationship between travel insurers and travel agents
Two US airlines are facing possible class action lawsuits over what is alleged as the deceptive marketing practices they use to sell optional addon travel insurance policies
p.58
the sales of these policies despite the fact that they are not licensed to sell insurance. The lawsuits were both filed by Florida-based law firm Leon Cosgrove and are almost identical; they allege that the airlines give customers ‘the false impression that the charge for trip insurance is a pass-through’ fee from a separate company, making the transaction one in which the airlines have no financial interest.
“Consumers are required to make an insurance selection,” the lawsuit against JetBlue states, “as they are unable to proceed with purchasing their airline tickets on [the airline’s] website until they choose whether to purchase a trip insurance policy. The consumer cannot simply ignore the insurance offering and
CONTINUED ON PAGE 6
Which? analysed figures from the FOS and stated on its own website that in almost four out of every 10 cases the FOS assessed related to travel insurance, it ruled in favour of consumers, stating that they had been treated unfairly by their insurers. Health and contents insurance customers, on the other hand, were found to have been treated unfairly in just over one-quarter of cases. It was also found that, in 2017, the FOS received a record number of complaints related to travel insurance. According to Which?, claims handlers were frequently found to have quibbled over details in small print, applied exclusions that were seen as ‘unfair’, and made use of ‘delaying tactics’ in order to avoid paying out for legitimate claims. Additionally, more than one-quarter of upheld complaints were related to undeclared health issues; it was decreed that some insurers were stretching the definition of what could be counted as a pre-existing condition. While these findings are certainly a bad look for an industry that is rarely starved for bad publicity – whether fair or unfair – it is encouraging to look at the figures another way and see that more than six in 10 travel insurance complaints were not upheld. This shows that the travel insurance industry is acting fairly more often than it’s deemed not to be; hopefully these figures will continue to improve, and before long, investigations such as this will be a minor footnote.