b <Relative FTS Production Expense>
Energy Shocks
<Relative FTS <Relative FTS Distribution Expense> Processing Expense>
Climate Shocks Economic Shocks
Relative Food Security Value -
Food Security Risk Mgmt Ability
<FTS Demand Affordability>
With the Community
<Relative Value of FTS* vs Non-FTS>
% of Decision Makers Aware of FTS Value
Willingness to Collaborate Q&Q of Shared Learnings
Q of Coordination Systems
Q of IT Design & Support
<Q&Q of Ideological Resistance> <Satisfaction/ Serving>
Meal Planning
-
Kids' Satisfaction
Q of Supply Awareness
Q of Q of School Network Awareness Awareness
Demand Ease of Use
Serving Preparing
Ability to Coordinate at Scale
Q of Network Market Awareness Legality of the Coordination Systems Abililty to Match Demand & Q of Bid Supply Timing
% FTS Market/ Network Coordination
<% FTS Policy Demand>
Bidding & Contracting
Collections
<FTS Demand Affordability>
Health Care Savings
internalizing
Curriculum Flexibility Timing Flexibility
Forecasting
Relative FTS Production Labor Costs
Practicality
Fulfillment
<% FTS Policy Demand>
<Q of FTS Food Service Commitment>
<Relative FTS Processing Profit>
FTS Supply Profitablity
Relative Water Quality
Relative Nutrient Content/ Serving
Taste Quality
<Ability to Innovate Production>
% Participation
-
<% FTS Supply>
externalizing
Q of FTS Food Service Commitment
<Ability to Innovate Processing> <Ability to Innovate Distribution> -
<Relative Experiential Value>
Q of FTS School Leadership
<Q of Experience of Food as an Honorable Profession>
Q of Food Service Skills
Q of Admin
Q of Champion(s)
<Relative Educational Value>
Relative Freshness & Ripeness
School Board's Democratic Q&Q of FTS Responsiveness Students & Parents
% FTS Schools Demand Q of School Board FTS Leadership Q&Q of Teacher & Staff FTS Commitment
<FTS Ease of Use>
FTS Demand Affordability
Available Tax Base Willingness & Ability to Subsidize
Tax Rate
- Relative FTS Production Profit
-
% Business Policy Demand
<% FTS Food System Decision Makers Committed to FTS>
% FTS Supply
% FTS Processing Supply
<Q&Q of Shared Learnings>
- Relative FTS Distribution Investment
<% FTS Policy Demand>
Other Relative FTS Distribution Expenses
Relative FTS Distribution Cost of Capital
Ability to Innovate Processing
<Q&Q of <Ability to Shared Innovate Supply> Learnings> Relative FTS Distribution Productivity
Relative FTS Distribution Expense
<Revenue/ Meal>
Relative FTS Distribution Income
<% FTS Policy Demand>
% Revenue to Distribution Relative FTS Distribution Profit
Distribution Risk Mgmt Ability Other Distribution Risk Mgmt Ability
-
Other Relative FTS Processing Expenses Relative FTS Processing Investment
Relative FTS Processing Cost of Capital -
Relative FTS Processing Productivity
% Citizen Demand
% Retail & Restaurant Demand
% FTS Policy Demand
Relative FTS Processing Expense
Processing Risk Mgmt Ability Other Processing Risk Mgmt Ability
State's Democratic Responsiveness
% State Policy Demand
<% FTS Market/ Network Coordination> Q&Q of Policy Leadership
<Revenue/ Meal>
Relative FTS Processing Income
Q of Citizen Leadership
% FTS Community Demand
% School Boards Policy Demand
Q&Q of Ideological Resistance -
-
% FTS Demand
-
% Federal Policy Demand
Federal Democratic Responsiveness -
Relative FTS Processing Profit
% Revenue to Processing
<% FTS Market/ Network Coordination>
Q of NGO Leadership
# of <Relative Revenue/ Cost/ Students Meal Economic Value> Meal
% Revenue to Production
% FTS Distribution Supply
Ability to Innovate Distribution
Production* = Farms, School Gardens, Hoop gardens, etc.
<Revenue/ Meal>
Relative Land Quality
Relative FTS Processing Labor Costs
<% FTS Market/ Network Coordination>
-
Q&Q = Quality & Quantity
Relative Aesthetic Value
gaining
-
Relative FTS Distribution Labor Costs
Q = Quality
Relative Environmental Value
<Relative FTS Production Profit>
<Relative FTS Distribution Profit>
FTS* = Healthy, Local, Sustainable, Equitable Farm-to-School Food *Experienciing = the 3C's = Classroom, Cafeteria, Community
Relative Recreational Value
<FTS Supply Profitablity>
Acres in FTS Production
losing
Farm-to-School Food by 2020 causing a Cultural Shift to % Healthy, Sustainble, Local, Equitable Food Citizens
Other Relative FTS Production Expenses - Relative FTS Relative FTS Relative FTS Production Production Production Investment Income Expense Relative FTS Cost of Production Capital Risk Mgmt Ability % FTS Other Production* <Acres in Supply Production FTS Risk Mgmt Production>
Development
Relative Air Quality
Relative Value of FTS* vs Non-FTS
Relative FTS Production Productivity
Ability to Innovate Production
<Q&Q of Shared Learnings>
Ability to Innovate Supply
Legend:
Relative Economic Value
Fun & Meaning
non-FTS production
Relative Preparation
Flexible (Alternative) Pathways
Agriculture
Q of IT Skills & Resources School Admin, Teachers & Staff Ease of Use
% FTS Food System Decision Makers Committed to FTS
Relative Experiential Value
Relative Presentation
Relative Tourism Value
Experientiality
Relative Selection
Q of Experience of Food as an Honorable Science Profession Relative Relative Small Career & LIfe Crafts- Educational Nutritional/ Health Business, Educational manship Ordering Integrative Math Value Value etc. Value Educational Absence Food Value of Toxins Economics, System Satisfaction/ Physics etc. Receiving & Education Food Serving Storing Expertise Culture History <FTS Ease <Q of Food of Use> Service Skills> <% FTS <% FTS <% FTS % Kids in % Schools Experiencing* % Demand> Demand> Supply> Healthy, Local, Sustainable, Equitable -
FTS Ease of Use
Supply Ease of Use
Relative Sharing & Eating
Relative Local Economic Multiplier
Cultural Value
Experiencing Change
Experiencing Empowerment
Relative Growing
With Families
Political/ Democratic Changemaker
% FTS Food System Decision Makers Convinced of FTS Value
Q of Demand Awareness
With School Personnel
Relative Social Value
With Marginalized Citizens
Experiencing Reality
Q&Q of Awareness Programs
Food Supply Economic Value
With Students
With Citizens
With Food Supply
<FTS Supply Profitablity>
<Relative Economic Value> <Relative Food Security Value> Q&Q of Competitive Resistance <Ability to Innovate Production> <Ability to Innovate Processing> <Ability to Innovate Distribution>
% Institutional Demand
<Relative Nutritional/ Health Value>