You won’t regret going on exchange >> Pg. 6
thegazette
TODAY high -7 low -12
Not going to psychics since 1906
FRIDAY, JANUARY 16, 2015
WESTERN UNIVERSITY • CANADA’S ONLY DAILY STUDENT NEWSPAPER • FOUNDED 1906
TOMORROW high 1 low -14 VOLUME 108, ISSUE 58
USC votes to cut size of council to 50
USC votes to shrink voting members to 50 and reduces senators and residence councillors to resource members, among other changes to council composition Katie Lear NEWS EDITOR @KatieAtGazette
After four hours of thorough debate, the University Students’ Council voted to drastically change their structural organization Wednesday night. The most notable changes include cutting the current number of voting members from 74 to 50, converting student senators to non-voting members and reducing residence councillors and the firstyear off-campus councillor to resource members. These suggestions were among seven recommendations initially presented in a comprehensive report on council composition complied by board of governors’ representative Jonathan English late last year. Recommendations to remove the board of governors representative as a voting member of council, electing committee chairs at-large and creating a senior operations committee were passed without incident. The fifth proposal concerning a vote within faculty councils to approve the president’s voting rights on the USC was tabled for another meeting. The balance of the debate was held when council deliberated on whether or not to take away residence and off-campus councillors’ voting rights. “The reason justified within the English report had a bit more to do with the notion of double representation,” Helfand said. “That being that these students are already being represented by members of council who have been elected to do so, and to have an extra group simply in residence skews the appropriate ratios, and also leads to a violation of the principles as set out within the report.” Councillors in favour of retaining residence councillors argued that first-years were a specific interest group who required specific representation beyond what they had within the existing council, and cited the ease of accessibility firstyear students have to the USC with their representatives residing within the residence. The USC initially failed to pass this motion, with only 63 per cent of the vote in favour, just shy of the 66
Jennifer Feldman • GAZETTE
S
O I BELIEVE … THAT REDUCING THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE WILL LEAD TO A GREATER CONNECTION BETWEEN STUDENTS. MATT HELFAND
USC PRESIDENT
per cent needed for it to pass. This result, however, drastically altered the math behind English’s proposal to implement a hard cap on the voting members of the USC at 50. Before voting proceeded on the hard cap, English explained how the inclusion of the first-year councillors changed his proposal. “If the recommendation to remove any of those groups that I proposed be removed didn’t go through, then the idea of the hard cap is immediately going to be very, very, very strange,“ English explained in an interview. English continued to illustrate how excluding a group such as firstyear residences from the proposed hard cap leads to inequality in the balance of how residences are represented, as the current by-law states that all affiliate college residences are lumped together under one vote, whereas the main campus residences are distinct. Further, English raised concerns on how the process was unfair to faculties who would’ve had a different proportional representation compared to existing residence councillors, should the proposal of getting rid of first-year residence councillors not pass.
In light of English’s presentation, council decided to suspend Robert’s Rules and Helfand suggested holding a straw poll to ask councillors whether or not they would change their vote after hearing this new information. “It is a little unusual to have a revote occur, but obviously there is a reason why it exists within Robert’s Rules of Order to have that sort of thing happen,” commented Helfand. After Helfand’s straw poll showed significant interest, motion three was opened for re-examination, and successfully passed the second time around with 71 per cent of the vote. Additionally, there was substantial debate regarding English’s second proposal regarding existing senators potentially losing their vote on council. English’s initial suggestion outlined concerns that senators arrived at council through a different means than councillors. Senators are appointed to council after being elected at large to the university’s senate, rather than directly elected to the USC. At the end of the meeting, all six of the recommendations discussed Wednesday night were adopted. Helfand was optimistic about council’s decision to adopt English’s proposals. “We’re reducing the amount of individuals on there, which will lead to more competitive elections, which will lead to more clear dialogue within council chambers itself, and ultimately greater connection between students because you have fewer people to communicate with. So I believe – and this is my opinion – that reducing the number of people will lead to a greater connection between students.”
>> COMMENT
Right changes made in USC composition Green eggs and Hamza
Hamza Tariq NEWS EDITOR @HamzaAtGazette
After much debate, deliberation and delay, the University Students’ Council has voted to reduce their numbers. In a special meeting on Wednesday, Canada’s largest student government agreed to put a hard cap of 50 voting members in council. This means that council would go down from 74 voting members to 49 plus the speaker. The decision came from recommendations of the presidential commission on council composition. Presidential commissioner Jonathan English compiled the special report, which is conducted every four years. His task was a little different this time — he was asked to not only do a mathematical report on council composition but also to investigate if the current size and composition of council was practical. After months of research and consultation from a number of involved groups, he found that Western’s undergraduate student council had too many members. The council downsize means that when a new council meets for the
year 2015–16, it will no longer feature residence councillors, student senators and the board of governors representative as voting members. After being presented with the findings of the report, council wrangled on a number of political and bureaucratic issues. The most hotly debated topic was the removal of voting privileges for first-year residence and off-campus councillors. A number of questions were raised. Is it fair for first-year students to not be represented on the student council by their residence councillors? Is it fair to deny firstyear students leadership opportunities and involvement with the USC? Is it fair to make such a significant decision for a group that is not even on council currently? The answer to all these questions is a resounding yes. It is fair. Why? First-year students are already represented on council by their faculty councillors, meaning that in the current situation, they are actually being double represented. First-year students will have the opportunity to be on a first year students’ caucus, where they can discuss issues pertaining to their constituents and then present these issues to the USC in general meetings. They will also be elected to standing committees as non-voting members. First-year representatives have also historically been the least active members on council. >> see REMOVALS pg.3