THURSDAY, JANUARY 24, 2013
VOL. 91 | NO. 4 | $4.25
LAND PRICES |
SERVING WESTERN CANADIAN FARM FAMILIES SINCE 1923
GRAIN MARKETING | COURTS
|
WHY VALUES ARE HARD TO ASSESS
P84
WWW.PRODUCER.COM
A WARM WELCOME ON A COLD DAY
Lawsuit proceeds despite ruling Supreme Court decision does not deter group BY BRIAN CROSS SASKATOON NEWSROOM
SEE LAWSUIT, PAGE 2
»
A 10-minute-old purebred calf stands for the first time at Palmer Charolais near Bladworth, Sask., Jan. 15. The winter calving season is in full swing across the Prairies. | WILLIAM DEKAY PHOTO
TRADE | DISEASE
Canada and U.S. pen agreement to enable trade in the event of contagious outbreaks BY KAREN BRIERE REGINA BUREAU
Animal disease outbreaks won’t disrupt trade between Canada and the United States once a new zoning agreement comes into effect. However, the implementation of that agreement could be a year or two away. Federal agriculture minister Gerry Ritz announced Jan. 16 that the two countries have agreed to recognize each other’s control measures in the event of highly contagious outbreaks
BULK UP NOW. EARN UP TO
of diseases such as avian influenza or foot-and-mouth that have the potential to disrupt trade. It means that an outbreak in one province wouldn’t necessarily prevent trade of livestock and meat products from other provinces. Designated control zones would be restricted while trade could carry on outside the zone. “Cross-border trade in live animals, meat and other animal products and byproducts contributes billions of dollars each year to Canada’s econo-
my,” Ritz said in a statement. “This arrangement will keep U.S. market opportunities open for Canadian producers should a foreign animal disease outbreak occur, all while protecting human and animal health.” Ian Alexander, Canada’s chief veterinary officer, said it will be months, if not a year or two, before the final guidelines are in place, but they will be focused on diseases that could spread rapidly from animal to animal. SEE AGREEMENT REACHED, PAGE 2
$1.00/ACRE MORE.
High-performance cereal herbicides. Convenient BULK UP savings. Even more Grower Dividends. Calculate your Dividends at dowagrodividends.ca today.
® TM Trademark of The Dow Chemical Company (“Dow”) or an affiliated company of Dow. 1112-19758
u|xhHEEJBy00001pzYv!:%
Agreement reached on control zones for disease
Deadlines February 20, 2013 March 20, 2013
PrePassTM XC TandemTM, SimplicityTM, Liquid AchieveTM, AttainTM XC, OcTTainTM XL, FrontlineTM XL, PrestigeTM XC, StellarTM
REWARDING HIGHER PERFORMANCE
»
JANUARY 24, 2013 Return undeliverable Canadian addresses to: Box 2500, Saskatoon, SK. S7K 2C4 The Western Producer is published in Saskatoon by Western Producer Publications, which is owned by GVIC Communications Corp. Publisher: Shaun Jessome Publications Mail Agreement No. 40069240; Registration No. 10676
Single desk grain marketing supporters are pushing ahead with plans to certify a class action lawsuit against Ottawa, claiming the elimination of the Canadian Wheat Board’s monopoly cost them hundreds of millions, if not billions of dollars in lost revenue. Winnipeg lawyer Anders Bruun said efforts to launch a class action will continue despite the Supreme Court of Canada’s recent refusal to hear arguments challenging the legality of Bill C-18, federal legislation that led to the elimination of single desk marketing last August. Bruun, who represents the pro-CWB group Friends of the Canadian Wheat Board (FCWB), said the Supreme Court rejection does not negate that Ottawa’s actions came at a significant cost to western Canadian farmers. Farmers should be compensated for the loss of price premiums that were earned through the single desk, he said. They should also be paid for wheat board assets that were bought through pool accounts and absorbed by the new, voluntary CWB, he added. The FCWB believes that Ottawa should have used government money, not farmer equity, to provide financial backing for the new organization. “That’s the government’s initiative and they should be financing every penny of it,” Bruun said. The Supreme Court announced Jan. 17 that it would not hear a case aimed at overturning federal legislation that ended the wheat board’s single-desk authority last year.