Technische Universit채t M체nchen Faculty of Architecture
Emerging Technologies Robert Marino Winter Semester 2012/13
Impressum Technische Universität München Faculty of Architecture Chair for Emerging Technologies Arcisstrasse 21 D 80333 München www.et.ar.tum.de
EDITING + GRAPHIC DESIGN Ulrike Fuchs Chair for Emerging Technologies, TUM TEXT Robert Marino Ulrike Fuchs Chair for Emerging Technologies, TUM PHOTOGRAPHY Chair for Emerging Technologies, TUM PRINTING Grafik + Druck, München This imprinting is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved, whether the whole or part of the materials is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, re printing, re-use of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in other ways, and storage in data banks. For any kind of use, permission of the copyright owner must be obtained. COVER Sukhov Tower in Moscow
1. Edition // Oct 2012
Technische Universit채t M체nchen Faculty of Architecture
Emerging Technologies Robert Marino Winter Semester 2012/13
CONCEPT EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES
CONCEPT EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES
Chair for Emerging Technologies The Chair for ´Emerging Technologies´ gives an engineering-oriented view onto the whole process of architecture. The focus of the teaching is to produce architectural projects that demonstrate the latest and most revolutionary heights of structural and material developments and is placed between architecture and industrial design. The field ranges from parametric design to the building of 1:1 prototypes in the context of digital production processes. Munich is a city touched by the grandeur of the Alps and by the technological achievement of the twenty-first century. The TUM enhances the programme the new Chair for ´Emerging Technologies´ through its surrounding high technology environment. Design and building processes are guided by the cooperations with partners from the industry, such as aerospace or car production (BWM, Eurocopter, Siemens, Audi, SGL Carbon, etc.). The pressure to reduce carbon emissions is one of the main factors in building and engineering processes which have to become most efficient. A strong interest in researching and the close cooperation with the Munich School of Engineering and the Centre for Energyefficient construction is obligatory. Alternating Visiting International Professors run the design courses of the new Chair for ´Emerging Technologies´. This ensures both innovation and variety in the teaching process and gives the students an interesting and wide-ranging view into the international field of architecture and product design. Sukhov Tower in Moscow
WS12/13 | Robert Marino
5
Visiting International Professor WS 2012/13 Robert Marino
8
Emerging Technologies
VISITING PROFESSOR | ROBERT MARINO
Robert Marino In high school, in the United States, I was a good math and science student, and therefore directed towards a technical education. Beginning in the fall of 1967, I attended a science and engineering college, the Stevens Institute of Technology in Hoboken, New Jersey. Ste vens was a very traditional engineering school founded by Colonel John Stevens in 1860. “The colonel”, as he was known, was one of the earliest inventors of the steamboat, was active in nautical designs, and was an early railroad proponent. The school was, and is, prominent as an institution based on a classical education at the service of practice through invention. In my time at Stevens I was an above average student, but I realized even then that the scope of my education was very narrow. It was at this point that I began to search. After military service I worked for the Public Service Electric and Gas Company of New Jer sey. I was being trained to assume a high-level management position, and was given a oneyear “tour” of the company, spending several excruciating weeks in each of its major depart ments. I eventually chose to work in a power generating station, seemingly the least sleepy posting, as my first assignment. The work was rather brutal for a new college graduate. I was put in charge of various crews of workers doing welding, machining, and electrical work. After about a week, our largest super-critical pressure steam turbine broke an armature ring and destroyed itself. Thus began a one-year period of continuous work to repair the tur bine and its generator. I had very little time for myself, but it was clear I was still searching. One of my goals for this period was to become a professional engineer. I was able to succeed in this effort, remarkably, by passing a very rigorous examination, including a segment on seismic design. experimental machine I worked on while an engineer
After leaving Public Service Electric and Gas Company I was interviewed for, and ac cepted as a research engineer at the Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory, in Princeton,
WS12/13 | Robert Marino
9
BACKGROUND | PHILOSOPHY
New Jersey. Thus began a magical learning period in my life. Our work was to sup port theoretical and experimental physicists in their project to harness fusion energy, energy released in the fusion of two nuclei of hydrogen. The devices used to create these reactions employed large magnets that were subject to very large forces. Struc tural analysis, large magnet design, machine design of stainless steel structures, and vacuum chamber design, were all potential tasks for our small engineering group. I was very fortunate to come under the supervision of engineer John Citrolo, an experienced engineer/analyst/designer. Mr. Citrolo was much more than this though. He was a true renaissance man, interested in everything. Our lunchtime meals, where talk of work was forbidden, could last several hours, and the topics could be as varied as equestrian tech niques, the formulation of betting odds at the racetrack, theories concerning beer-making, hunting, fishing, sailing, or anything else of interest to the assembled group. Because I was searching, this arrangement appealed to me greatly, and I reaped the benefit of this sixyear, “renaissance” education. It was during this period that Mr. Citrolo encouraged me to take a studio course at the Princeton University School of Architecture. I believe he did this partially out of his own curiosity, and he quizzed me endlessly about my studio work and history of ar chitecture classes. This period led seamlessly into my fulltime graduate studies. Princeton at the time was fully in the thrall of post-modern theory, an appreciation of Beaux Arts methodology, and a fascination with the Italian Renaissance. In retrospect, I feel very fortunate to have been educated at this time, as all these topics have re mained very important to me personally, to my practice, and to my teaching. I gradu ated, by no means auspiciously, in 1982, in the midst of a major recession in the Unit ed States. I began a brief nine-month stint with Ted Liebman, an active and prominent housing designer, in his marvelous offices high above midtown, in Raymond Hood’s ex
10 Emerging Technologies
BACKGROUND | PHILOSOPHY
traordinary McGraw-Hill building, the perfect setting for a young New York City architect. Mr. Liebman’s work diminished and I was very lucky to be hired by my former teacher, Mi chael Graves. At his offices in an old home on Nassau St. in Princeton, I was reacquainted with very talented former classmates, re-introduced to the very special Beaux Arts methods of the office, and had the good fortune to work with Professor Graves on important projects. The most interesting of these was the addition to the Whitney Museum for American Art. An effort first led by Ted Brown, an associate in the office, then by myself, the project proposed a more than doubling of the size of the original Marcel Breuer building. In the course of this work I had, by necessity, copies of the original Breuer drawings for construction. It was during this period that I was asked by a professor from Columbia University, Richard Plunz, if he could borrow the Breuer drawings for his studio assignment. The assignment was identical to the commission given to Michael Graves. I was happy to get reproductions for him, and because I was so familiar with the project, he invited me to the final review for his studio. I became enthralled with the studio process and applied to teach at Columbia for the fall term of 1985. I was accepted as an assistant professor to teach studio and as the coordinator of a nascent technology program. I had previously passed my professional architectural examination and felt it was time to go out on my own. The teaching atmosphere at Columbia exactly coincided with my own search. At this time the studio work was distancing itself from Beaux Arts methodologies, and the newer realms of poetic discourse and materially driven designs were beginning to emerge. Steven Holl, then a young associate professor, and Kenneth Frampton, were given the task of re-formu lating the introductory studio classes for graduate students. I was very fortunate to be able to participate for many years in this program. At the same time I was equally fortunate to have a wide array of projects to work on in my own practice, and thus I was able to continue the research in a realistic sense.
WS12/13 | Robert Marino
11
BACKGROUND | PHILOSOPHY
12 Emerging Technologies
BACKGROUND | PHILOSOPHY
It was in my first years at Columbia that I made the acquaintance of Professor Alvaro Malo, who was hired to lead the advanced degree students. Professor Malo then moved to the University of Pennsylvania, his alma mater, and encouraged me to follow, which I did. It was there through his mentorship, and that of Professor Peter McCleary, that my own interests began to become focused. It was these two talented professors that I became acquainted with the lessons of Louis Kahn and Robert LeRicolet. I began, at this time to appreciate methods I had intuitively used in my own work, and began to find a voice for explaining these principles to students. I have been very fortunate to find willing clients, ready to take chances. There are manifold reasons for this bravery on their part. In almost all cases they came to me primarily with a serious architectural problem, and secondarily with an interest in architecture. This order of purpose exactly coincides with my own feelings of ethical responsibility in architecture. These clients were generally of modest means. In my view these are prime generators of architectural invention; necessity and required efficiency of effort. My work has been published, usually in European academic periodicals, and almost never in commercial publications. I have been fortunate also in having Rockport Press, as part of their series, “Contemporary World Architects�, publish a collection of my projects in 2006.
Caption Image left
WS12/13 | Robert Marino
13
BACKGROUND | PHILOSOPHY
INTRODUCTION | EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES
Emerging Technologies by ROBERT MARINO “Necessity is the mother of invention” is a well-known American bromide with perhaps more than a modicum of truth to it. In its initial stages, a culture’s technology is a response to problems of necessity. The suc cessful implementation of this technology allows a population to subsist, to meet the most elemental requirements of existence, to counter the forces of nature, and to sometimes allow humans to thrive in hostile environments. Once these requirements are met, the power of this technology, this complex cultural phenomenon, can be directed towards other purposes. Architecture can be considered an art form that depends on this arbitration, a careful consideration of how technological powers are apportioned, towards necessity, or towards other ends. This balance of purpose allows architecture’s unique position among the arts, and in my view, defines its ethical responsibility. That a technology can emerge in a culture for reasons other than necessity is a condition that we are now obliged to question. I would maintain that technological development at the behest of pure expression is a false technology. This is a common condition in ad vanced capitalistic systems in which the idea of necessity is sometimes extended, and made hyperbolic. Necessity in this case is made part of consumption. In its worst form, in the words of Thorstein Veblen1, consumption becomes conspicuous consumption. Con spicuous consumption of physical objects then becomes an end in itself. Its forms are relegated to the dictums of “taste”, and in the worst scenario, have no regard whatever for efficiency, and no relation to Nature. 1
Veblen, Thorstein The Theory of the Leisure Class (1899)
WS12/13 | Robert Marino
15
BACKGROUND | PHILOSOPHY
Experimental project in China based on LeRicolet‘s „Cosmorama“
Some architects believe as I do, that architecture of a culture is related to that culture pri marily through its true technologies, those that were derived of necessity. In this sense we, as architects, have an ethical responsibility with regard towards the use of this technology. The balance between technology at the service of subsistence and technology at the ser vice of expression must be very carefully managed. In an era of fragile natural resources and an increasingly complex and specialized labor force, our expended energies must be directed with maximum efficiency. As architects we must rely on our instinct and our intuition in this regard. Our instincts as manipulators of substance should be our primary mode of operation and our primary knowledge of the capabilities of our own technology. “Intelligence and instinct operate best as cooperative capacities, as suggested by Henri Bergson in Creative Evolution: ‘There are things that intelligence alone is able to seek, but which, by itself, it will never find. These things instinct alone could find; but it will never seek them.’ The cooperation between intelligence and instinct is best represented not in Homo sapien but in Homo faber, who is the being in complete self-possession of his own instrumentality. The knowledge of matter is instinctive. It is part of the natural order by which every living organism is in continuous exchange with its surroundings. It rises spontaneously out of physical necessity and has an effect on matter by integrating it into the body, or arranging it as a direct extension of the body. The knowledge of form is intelligent, operating within the datum of nature, deliberately rearranging matter to set up a new kind of order, the artificial order. Intelligence, which gains complete instrumentality in the human being, normally pro ceeds by abstraction and is separable from the physical act of making.”2 2
16 Emerging Technologies
Malo, Alvaro Contemporary World Architects, Robert Marino; Rockport Press, 2006
INTRODUCTION | EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES
The physical instincts necessary to effect knowledge can only be gained through the ex perience of actually using our bodies to transform raw materials. During this process our bodies are at once performing work, and are also instruments, giving us immediate and continuous feedback about the materials at hand.The consideration of the manipulation of matter as an important human undertaking has unquestionable political implications. If we as architects, place a premium on this ability, then we are endorsing the special position of the labor force that actually makes objects. The appreciation of the individuals who have the closest contact with materials, individuals who with their own bodies effect transforma tions of the materials found in Nature, must be a natural consequence of a culture’s values. In many cultures, unfortunately, the appreciation of the skills necessary to manipulate ma terials is dwindling. In fact, the opposite has occurred: the physical work-person is consid ered at the margins of society. The most labor-intensive jobs, the ones in which the body’s contact with the materials being transformed is acute, are considered the most menial. The understanding of the methods used to produce objects is considered unnecessary, and is remote to most people’s everyday thoughts. It should be one of our goals to reverse this trend and to raise the estimation of Homo-faber again, for it is through this personal, physi cal understanding that we can come to know our Earth, its raw materials, and the limitations we can place on it. It is our prevalent technologies that allow the rearrangement of matter into form. The best forms, the most efficient, are intelligent, understood by the maker as extensions of his body as Homo faber, and have by natural consequence, Nature as a model. It is hoped that ar chitects would employ only technologies borne of necessity, that they employ only the most efficient uses of material and labor, and that the expressions that result would be not only expressions, but Forms, in the Platonic sense. The development of technologies that are necessary, and promote true architectural form should be encouraged to emerge.
WS12/13 | Robert Marino
17
Kick off Task Structural Tower Design Task Machines for Living
KICK OFF TASK | MACHINES FOR LIVING
beispiele zur inspiration: examples for inspiration:
needle tower 1968 kenneth snelson
telecommunications tower barcelona, 1992 foster associates
20 Emerging Technologies
sabolovka radioturm moskau, 1919 vladimir suchov
maibaum
messeturm m端nchen, 2002 kaup scholz und partner mit werner sobek
swiss-air tower z端rich, 1993 richard horden
glockenturm berlin, 1963 ewald bubner und frei otto
KICK OFF TASK | STRUCTURAL TOWER
beweglicher turm 1963 frei otto
se parts fit 0cm). in the height is unlan can not cm.
er in a disasox (10 x 10 the studio
rry only it's additional tower in a embled and e times.
als are al-
mast einer america's cup yacht
task
aufgabe
design a tower whose parts fit in a box (10 x 10 x 10cm). in the assembled state the height is unlimited but the floor plan can not exceed 100cm by 100cm.
entwerfen sie einen möglichst hohen turm, dessen einzelteile im demontierten zustand in eine kiste mit den maßen 10cm mal 10cm mal 10cm passen. im aufgebauten zustand ist die höhe unbegrenzt, die grundrissfläche darf jedoch 100 cm mal 100 cm nicht überschreiten.
design space in the disassembled state: entwurfsraum im demontierten zustand:
10cm
Structural Tower
please bring your tower in a disassembled state in a box (10 x 10 x 10cm) on tuesday to the studio
10cm
10cm the tower has to carry only it's der turm ist im demontierten zuown weight and no additional amwhose dienstagparts morgen uma box (10 x 10 x 10cm). In the assembled state the height Design astand tower fit in loads. construct the tower in a 9:00 uhr am lehrstuhl abzugeben is unlimited but the floor can not exceed 100cm by 100cm. Please bring your tower in way that it can be assembled and und anschließend bisplan spätestens disassembled multiple times. 11.00 in unserem übungssaal aufa disassembled state in a box (10 x 10 x 10cm) on tuesday to the studio the tower has to zubauen. two different materials carry are al-only it‘s own weight and no additional loads. Construct the tower in a way that it can lowed. der turm muss nur sich selbst be assembled and disassembled winter seme tragen und keine weiteren lastenmultiple times. Two different materials are allowed. aufnehmen. konstruieren sie den Technische Universität München aufgabe turm so, dass er mehrfach aufFakultät für Architektur design space in the assembled state: design space in the state: unddisassembled abgebaut werden kann. entwerfen sie einen möglichst entwurfsraum im montierten zustand: entwurfsraum im demontierten zustand: hohen turm, dessen einzelteile es sind alle materialien und konstim demontierten zustand in eine ruktionsarten zugelassen. kiste mit den maßen 10cm mal 10cm mal 10cm passen. im auf10cm gebauten zustand ist die höhe unissue: 16.10.20 10cm begrenzt, die grundrissfläche darf submission: 23 jedoch 100 cm mal 100 cm nicht überschreiten.
initial ex
der turm ist im demontierten zustand am dienstag morgen um 9:00 uhr am lehrstuhl abzugeben und anschließend bis spätestens 11.00 in unserem übungssaal aufzubauen.
visiting profess technische univ
10cm
contact
initial exercise
der turm muss nur sich selbst tragen und keine weiteren lasten technische universität münchen aufnehmen. konstruieren den fakultät sie für architektur turm so, dass er visiting mehrfach aufprofessorship design space in the assembled state: und abgebaut werden kann. technologies emerging entwurfsraum im montierten zustand: es sind alle materialien und konstarcisstrasse 21 ruktionsarten zugelassen. d 80333 münchen
∞
winter semester 2012/13
100cm issue: 16.10.2012 - 10:00 submission: 23.10.2012 - 09:00 uhr until 10:00
fon: +49 (0)89.289 22 491 fax: +49 (0)89.289 28 408
100cm
e-mail: wieland.schmidt@lrz.tum.de
visiting professorship emerging technologies technische universität münchen
WS12/13 | Robert Marino
∞
21
DESIGN TASK | MACHINES FOR LIVING
Airbus A380 prefabrication of peaces
Machines for Living by ROBERT MARINO Munich will have an escalating need for housing for individuals in the future. This need is already apparent as young people, single people, workers without their families, students, and others, find it very difficult to find appropriate small housing units within the city. It is presumed in an older city like Munich, that high efficiency housing sites have already been developed. The alternative to be examined shall, therefore, be vertical in nature. The semester work will build upon the concepts that have successfully demonstrated the efficiency of the single prefabricated unit. It is the purpose of the forthcoming semester’s work to multiply these concepts in scale. The emerging technology to be dealt with is prefabrication. The semester will begin with an intense research of the prevalent techniques of prefabrica tion as associated with housing units. In particular the question of vertical unit assembly will be investigated. The question of integrated structural capacity, redundancy, building systems interconnection, and other issues will be researched. The operative method for research during the semester shall involve analogous modelling techniques. This will involve the fabrication of large-scale models in representative materi als, that will test the aforementioned prefabrication concepts. Materials and techniques will be limited and controlled so that a simulation of real materials and techniques can be approximated. The semester work will appropriately be shown in a final analogous model.
22 Emerging Technologies
DESIGN TASK | MACHINES FOR LIVING
M a a i o a
kisho kurokawa, nakagin capsule tower, 1972
T e w
Many structural concepts are possible, however if prefabrication is to be taken seriously, these concepts divide themselves into categories: The self-structural modular solution. This potentially involves complete unit prefabrica足 tion, with each unit able to support the units above and to provide lateral strength to the structure.
T
T t w s
The independent structure providing all structural necessity for prefabricated modules, both vertical and lateral. The independent structure used solely for vertical loading, depending on attached modules for lateral stability.
T t a w a
The independent structure used solely for lateral stability, the modules providing only verti足 cal capacity. Students will work in teams of two. Studio assistants will be directly responsible for the work of the teams. Each team, with the guidance of the assistant will focus on a conceptual solution, to be demonstrated in the analogous model.
M
The Munich department of city planning is now researching multiple potential sites, of a small footprint, requiring verticality to achieve meaningful density. These sites will most likely be irregular and oddly proportioned. Inventive solutions for prefabricated, vertical housing will be required.
WS12/13 | Robert Marino
23
24 Emerging Technologies
SITE The site chosen for the semester’s work is in Isarvorstadt, just south of the historical city-center. It is a triangular block bounded by Klenzestrasse to the southwest, But termelcherstrasse to the southeast, and Rumfordstrasse to the north. It is a typical Munich city block consisting mostly of six story housing with an internal court provid ing light and air to the rear, inner facades of the units. PROGRAM The program for your buildings can be stated very simply: multiple housing units of a minimal size for living, to be placed in the “gaps” shown, and allowed to grow verti cally. The limitations for size of unit, number of units, the height of resulting structures, and other variables shall be secondary to, and the result of one overarching concept: A theory of prefabrication and assembly resulting in a form and a resulting structure based on a vertical collection of cells.
Munich Block at Reichenbachplatz
WS12/13 | Robert Marino
25
Organisation Visiting Professorship Courses | Design Studio | Organisation
WS12/13 | Robert Marino
27
ORGANISATION | SEMINAR
Prefabrication in Housing The seminar will be organized around four field trips, each organized by one teaching as足 sistant. Three will be to major housing prefabrication companies, the microcompacthome O2 village and one will be to the Munich Department of City Planning. Field trips will occur early in the semester. Students will organize themselves into groups in order to produce booklets that will summarize the traits and methods discovered in each field trip. Each group will both make an oral presentation to the class, and produce a written summary of the techniques employed. Field trips have been organized and are included in the semester schedule which is the shedule on the next page. >> obligatory to our design cours
Credits: 3 ECTS Hours: see time shedule Room: site visits Lecturer: Prof. Robert Marino Dipl.- Ing. Ulrike Fuchs, Dr.- Ing. Nadine Zinser-Junghanns, Dipl.- Ing. Wieland Schmidt, Dipl.- Ing. Moritz Mungenast
ORGANISATION | TIMELINE
Timeline TIME
EVENT
LOCATION
COURS
16.10.2012
10.00 h
Introduction LECTURE: Robert Marino introduction to design task and kick off task
Room 4170
DESIGN MA//DIPL
22.10.2012 22.10.2012 23.10.2012 23.10.2012
10:00 h 14:00 h 10:00 h 14:00 h
Group Breakfest EXCURSION: Building Department Presentation kick off task EXCURSION: O2 Village
Room 4170 external Room 4170 external
DESIGN MA//DIPL EXCURSION DESIGN MA//DIPL EXCURSION
29/30.10.2012
09:00 h
Design Review
Room 4170
DESIGN MA//DIPL
05/06.11.2012
09:00 h
Design Review
Room 4170
DESIGN MA//DIPL
12/13.11.2012
09:00 h
Design Review
Room 4170
DESIGN MA//DIPL
19.11.2012 20.11.2012
09:00 h 07:00 h
1.TESTAT EXCURSION: Baufritz, M채tzsa
Room 4170 external
DESIGN MA//DIPL EXCURSION
26/27.11.2012
09:00 h
Design Review
Room 4170
DESIGN MA//DIPL
03/04.12.2012
09:00 h
Design Review
Room 4170
DESIGN MA//DIPL
10.12.2012 11.12.2012
09:00 h 11:00 h
Design Review EXCURSION: BMW
Room 4170 external
DESIGN MA//DIPL EXCURSION
17.12.2012 18.12.2012
09:00 h 09:00 h
2.TESTAT Design Review
Room 4170 Room 4170
DESIGN MA//DIPL DESIGN MA//DIPL
07/08.01.2013
09:00 h
Design Review
Room 4170
DESIGN MA//DIPL
14.01.2013 15.01.2013
09:00 h 09:00 h
3.TESTAT Design Review
Room 4170 Room 4170
DESIGN MA//DIPL DESIGN MA//DIPL
21/22.01.2013
09:00 h
Design Review
Room 4170
DESIGN MA//DIPL
28.01.2013
09:00 h
FINAL TESTAT
Vorhoelzer Forum
DESIGN MA//DIPL
WS12/13 | Robert Marino
29
ORGANISATION | TEACHING TEAM
Teaching team at TU M端nchen
Robert Marino Visiting Professor
Dipl. - Ing. Ulrike Fuchs Teaching Assistant
Dr. - Ing. Nadine Zinser-Junghanns Teaching Assistant
Dipl. - Ing. Robert Liedgens Visiting Teaching Assistant
Dipl. - Ing. Fredrik Werner Visiting Teaching Assistant
CONTACT Technische Universit辰t M端nchen Faculty of Architecture Chair for Emerging Technologies Arcisstrasse 21 D 80333 M端nchen
Dipl. - Ing. Wieland Schmidt Teaching Assistant
Dipl. - Ing. Moritz Mungenast Teaching Assistant
30 Emerging Technologies
Alexandra von Petersdorff Office Management
Fon: +49 (0)89.289 22 491 Fax: +49 (0)89.289 28 408 E-mail: contact@et.ar.tum.de E-mail adresses assistants: surname.name@et.ar.tum.de
ORGANISATION | COOPERATION INSTITUTES
Cooperation institutes PROVISIONAL HEAD Chair for Architectural Informatics Prof. Dr.-Ing. Frank Petzold www.ai.ar.tum.de
COOPERATION INSTITUTES TU MĂœNCHEN Faculty of Architecture: Chair for Climatic Design and Building Services Prof. Dr.-Ing. Gerhard Hausladen www.bk.ar.tum.de Chair for Energy efficient and sustainable Planning and Construction Univ. Prof. Dr.-Ing., M.Arch.II (UCLA) Werner Lang www.enpb.bv.tum.de Chair for Industrial Design Prof. Dipl. Des. Fritz Frenkler www.id.ar.tum.de Teaching and Research Unit for Technology and Design of Shell Constructions Prof. Dr.-Ing. Tina Wolf www.hk.ar.tum.de
WS12/13 | Robert Marino
31
ORGANISATION | TEACHING TEAM
Permanent teaching team
Dipl.- Ing. Ulrike Fuchs Teaching Assistant
Dipl.- Ing. Moritz Mungenast Teaching Assistant
2011-
Teaching + research dept. ‚Emerging Technologies‘, TUM
2011-
Teaching + research dept. ‚Emerging Technologies‘, TUM
2011-
Allmann Sattler Wappner Architekten, Munich
2009-
Teaching + research dept. of Prof. Wolf, TUM
2010
Swiss Architect Registration: SIA
2009
Teaching + research dept. of Prof. Horden, TUM
2010
Airport building department, consultant
2005-11
Auer + Weber, Munich
2008 -
Own practice in Munich: ARCHITEKTURFUCHS
2004-05
Shigeru Ban Architects, Paris
www.architekturfuchs.com
2004
SWA, Sydney
2008-11
Teaching + research dep. of Prof. Horden, TUM
2003
Auer + Weber, Munich
2008
German Architect Registration: Bayr. Arch. Kammer
2003
Diploma at TU München
2008
Eins zu 33, Munich
2002
Studied at UPC, Barcelona
2007
Britisch Architect Registration: ARB
2001
Studied at EPFL, Lausanne
2005-08
Horden cherry lee architects, London
1999-01
Studied at TU München
2005
Teaching + research dep. of Prof. Horden, TUM
1995-99
Studied at Univ. Kaiserslautern
2005
Blauwerk architekten, munich
1974
Born in Stuttgart
2005
Diploma at TU München
2003
Ackermann und Partner, Munich
2002-04
Kochta Architekten, Munich
2002-05
Studied at TU München
2000-02
Studied at BTU Cottbus
1979
Born in Munich
32 Emerging Technologies
ORGANISATION | PERMANENT TEACHING TEAM
Dipl.- Ing. Wieland Schmidt Teaching Assistant
Dr.-Ing. Nadine Zinser-Junghanns Teaching Assistant
2011-
Teaching + research dept. ‚Emerging technologies‘, TUM
2011-
Teaching + research dept. ‚Emerging technologies‘, TUM
2005-
Own practice in Munich: Wieland Schmidt Architekten
2011
Own practice in Munich: workbench
www.wieland-schmidt-architekten.de
2011
Phd ´architecture + transportation design´
2005-11
Teaching + research dept. of Prof. Horden, TUM
2005-2011
Teaching + research dept. of Prof. Horden, TUM
2001-05
Helmut Jahn, Chicago
2004-2005
Olga Subirós, cloud9, Barcelona
2001
Werner Sobek, Stuttgart
2004
Daniel Modól de Tell, Barcelona
2001
Diploma at TU-Stuttgart
2003
Alfredo Arribas, Barcelona
1999-00
Student research assistant, inst. for light weight structures
2003
Diploma at TU-Stuttgart
1998-01
Studied at TU-Stuttgart
2002
MGT architects, Sydney
1997-98
Studied at TU-Vienna
2001
Studied at accademia di architettura, Mendrisio
1995-97
Studied at Univ. Kaiserslautern
1997 - 00
Studied at TU-Stuttgart
1973
Born in Berlin
1977
Born in Freudenstadt
WS12/13 | Robert Marino
33
Impressum Technische Universität München Faculty of Architecture Chair for Emerging Technologies Arcisstrasse 21 D 80333 München www.et.ar.tum.de
EDITING + GRAPHIC DESIGN Ulrike Fuchs Chair for Emerging Technologies, TUM TEXT Robert Marino Ulrike Fuchs Chair for Emerging Technologies, TUM PHOTOGRAPHY Chair for Emerging Technologies, TUM PRINTING Grafik + Druck, München This imprinting is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved, whether the whole or part of the materials is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, re printing, re-use of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in other ways, and storage in data banks. For any kind of use, permission of the copyright owner must be obtained. COVER Design simulation illustrating a processbased emergent configuration and spatial properties 1. Edition // July 2012
Impressum
Technische Universit채t M체nchen Faculty of Architecture Chair for Emerging Technologies Arcisstrasse 21 D 80333 M체nchen www.et.ar.tum.de