SOTIRIOUARCHITECTS-SELECTED WORKS

SOTIRIOU ARCHITECTS - selected WORKS -

ΥΟΙΤΑ Π22

ΚΑΤΑΣΤΗΜΑ Ι-Κ3 Ε= 63,63 τ.μ.

Θ17

1/Π

Π21

ΥΟΚΙΝΕΓΥΕ ΥΟΚΡΑΜ

Χ3 ±0,00

Θ6

-0,40

-0,10

)ΣΟΜΟΡΔΟΖΕΠ(

ΙΔΙΟΚΤΗΣΙΑ ΑΓΝΩΣΤΟΥ

-1,35

Π34

Π27

Χ5

A/3

ΚΤΙΡΙΟ Β

ΚΑΤΑΣΤΗΜΑ Ι-Κ2 Ε= 123,52 τ.μ. Θ8

50,0+

Ζ

21,0+

ΚΑΤΑΣΤΗΜΑ Ι-Κ5 Ε= 28,11 τ.μ. Π37

Π29

Π19

W.C.H.

-0,25

Π28

Η/Χ

ΧΩΡΟΣ ΦΥΤΕΥΣΗΣ

-1,72

ΚΑΤΑΣΤΗΜΑ Ι-Κ4 Ε= 14,48 τ.μ.

Χ2 Π30

Θ5

±0,00

Χ6

Θ15

-1,67

Π18

W.C.H.

-1,30

Π17

W.C.

Θ11

W.C.

W.C.H.

ΘΕΣΗ ΣΤΑΘ/ΣΗΣ ΘΣ30 Ε=11,25τ.μ.

Θ13

Θ14

1/Π

Π33

Π32

Θ16

Ε

ΙΔΙΟΚΤΗΣΙΑ ΑΓΝΩΣΤΟΥ

-0,45

Π31

W.C.H.

Θ20 Π39

-0,10

Τ.Ο 757

Π36

Θ19

Θ7

A/3 Π20

Π35 Π38

ΧΩΡΟΣ ΦΥΤΕΥΣΗΣ

Π16

Π15

ΑΡΜΟΣ

Δ

)ΣΟΜΟΡΔΟΖΕΠ (

-1,79

Π14

Sotiriou Architects provide a high quality service through a team work of skilled and experienced professionals.Our profession is involved with small or large scale projects, competitions, landscape and research. We try to have a strong contact with the client to materialize their ideas in a “healthy” architectural language having in mind the economy of means. Μ

Ν

ΑΦΑΙΡΟΥΜΕΝΟ ΤΜΗΜΑ

70,0+

Θ18

Π12

Τ.Ο 567

Π13

±0,00

Θ4

Π11

Θ9

Ξ

Χ4

Γ

Θ10

-1,33

ΙΔΙΟΚΤΗΣΙΑ ΑΓΝΩΣΤΟΥ

3/Π

4/Π

03,0+

00,1+

CONTENTS

A/2

Χ1

Ε Ν Α ΖΤ

Π8

Τ.Ο 667

ΚΤΙΡΙΟ Α

4-13 INTERNATIONAL AWARD ±0,00

-0,10

Θ1 Π2

Ο.Γ.

Π3

Π5

Π1

Π4

-0,10

Π7

Θ2

Θ3 Π6

Ο.Γ.

14-17MASTERPLANNING

ΑΡΜΟΣ

ΧΩΡΟΣ ΦΥΤΕΥΣΗΣ

ΠΡΑΣΙΑ 6.00μ

18-29 RESIDENTIAL Ρ.Γ.

Β

Ρ.Γ.

Α

-0,70

-0,78

ΛΕΩΦΟΡΟΣ ΗΡΑΚΛΕΙΟΥ Πλατος 44,00 μ

A/1

30-47 PUBLIC BUILDINGS 48-67 HOUSING

Kostis Sotiriou was born in Athens in1980.

He studied architecture in the university of UEL, Greenwich, and sculpture in Athens school of Fine Arts. He joined the firm in 2005 when he returned from London.

Essential field of his interest is the nomadic investigation of the Balkan area.

Constructions in non-urban territories, details of structure techniques and bolting surfaces create a repeated coating of his work. He lives and works in Athens.

ΕΙΣΟΔΟΣ ΠΕΖΩΝ-ΑΝΑΠΗΡΩΝ

ΑΡΜΟΣ

ΧΩΡΟΣ ΦΥΤΕΥΣΗΣ

Τ.Ο 067

Π9

ΚΑΤΑΣΤΗΜΑ Ι-Κ1 Ε= 378,85 τ.μ.

A/2

ΕΙΣΟΔΟΣ ΑΥΤΟΚΙΝΗΤΩΝ

55,0+

Π10

ΙΔΙΟΚΤΗΣΙΑ ΑΓΝΩΣΤΟΥ

ΣΑΙΛΗΜ ΣΗΝΙΚΚΟΚ

Evangelos Sotiriou was born in Athens in 1971.

He is the Co- founder of Sotiriou Architects Firm. He studied in the U.S.A and Greece and he has been a licensed architect since 1998.

In his professional career of 14 years his experience in design & construction has helped immensely in the firm’s ability to deal with the client’s most complex issues . Alongside he has been specialised in Environmental design and Energy Building Inspection . He was also appointed as a Member of Urban Planning Architectural Committee as well as evaluator in Greek Architectural Competition.

-1,25

-1,57

A/4

ΚΛΙΜΑΚΟΣΤΑΣΙΟ Ε= 46,82τ.μ.

57,0+

George Sotiriou was born in Athens in 1967.

In 1990 he studied at TEI of Athens Graphic Arts and Artists’ Studies. In 1993 he continued his studies at Wentworth Institute of Technology in Boston and graduated with a Diploma in Architectural Technology . He also studied Architecture in the Politechnic school of Thessaloniki in 1998 from which he graduated first from his class and in 2002 he took M.Sc. in architecture (1st) . He has worked in architectural offices and organizations as Architect Scientific Officer. Since 1998 he has been working with Evangelos Sotiriou in Architectural consultancy and construction where building has developed, urban planning and urban design studies of private and public projects.

He won First Prize in Architecture European competition and has served as judge of architectural competitions YPEKA. His works have been exhibited in group exhibitions and also in architectural publications and magazines in Greece and abroad.

68-77 LANDSCAPE 78-87 INTERIORS 88-95 RE-SEARCH

INTERNATIONAL AWARD

First prize in a European Architectural Competition Europan 6. City: Athens, Subject: ‘’In between cities’’, 2001 ‘Between’ the yard and the road Characteristics of the surrounding area.

The study area constitutes a part of a complicated system of roads that fragmentize a former rural area.

A land where the increasing ‘needs’ of the city ‘brought’ it to its edges and gradually replaced it with a constructed area.

The low cost of land, which led to the settlement of the minorities and the low- income classes, had as a result the blending of different ways of living. This blending, which is reflected in the form and the plan of the house, combined with the increasing needs of today’s housing led to the transformation of the initial unit through extensions. As a result, a complexity is presented in the built area.

The houses of the area seem to be ‘trapped’ within a disorder in the square blocks. Some of them are on the edge of the road while others are in a short distance from it.

The typical Greek apartment buildings seem to influence the form and plan of the area’s housing but at the same time it contrasts to the resident’s way of living. Another element being considered is the ‘road’, which is the center of the public space and functions as an element that serves the transportation, the strolling, the play and becomes the basic point of the neighborhood.

5

Approaching our proposal Bearing in mind: a) the existing urban renewal study of the greater area, b) the new construction projects which are planned to be built around the area (stadiums, motorways), c) the elements drawn from the characteristics of the dwelling’s structure apparent in the area and d) its association with the street and the yard, its neighboring and its different ways of inhabitancy, our proposal focuses on: - The encouragement of social contact and interaction in the dwellings, the yard or the street - The “flexibility” of a dwelling according to the different ways of inhabitance already existing - The gathering of basic elements of the already existing dwelling’s structure (in the area around it) and the fabric resulted from it - The seeking – search of a ‘road’ as an element which appears in the out-door space, the building, the residence.

- The constant transition-penetration of green from the public to the private spaces.

- The dynamic connection of strolling with contacting the nearby areas and new buildings which are already scheduled to be constructed.

The proposal seeks to constitute a “chain of movement” that will become an integral part of the existing region and a “link” for a nearby-undeveloped one.

Europan 6.

City: Athens, Subject: ‘’In between cities’’, 2001

7

Europan 6.

City: Athens, Subject: ‘’In between cities’’, 2001

9

Europan 6.

City: Athens, Subject: ‘’In between cities’’, 2001

11

Urban Design Our building volumes or parts of them will either expand the block or they will ‘produce’ it from the beginning, having as a result the emergence of a city ‘web’, which will become a link to the already existing or a prospective one.

The ‘web’ of the public out-door spaces follows the same rules with the constructed area. The bigger public spaces-squares surrounded by the blocks have some commercial uses that serve the surrounding neighborhoods. The transition from the road to the square and the communal yard has a ‘cohesive continuity’ and leads to a widen space-road-square bigger than the previous ones (free spaces) which is going to function as a recreation area.

This space will ‘embody’ the dry riverbed of the area while, at the same time, it will preserve its natural environment leaving a ‘web’ to penetrate.

The pedestrian and limited access roads function as’continuity’ for the existing nearby urban renewal study while the cycling networks and the green zones constitute a strolling area. The design of the house, the yard, the square- The road as an integral part of them. According to the requirements of the project, we examine the ‘type’ of the house, which includes the way of living, the flexibility, the multiformity and the association with the communal road-space.

The expanding model of the house, which is characteristic of the area, (illegal expansions to the existing unit, using a variety of construction materials) becomes the starting point for its structure. The transformation of the house’s volume and form serves the size required and needed.

The house becomes the ‘border’ between the yard and the street. Within this ‘border’ the functional units (living room, bathroom- kitchen and the bedrooms) are placed. By offering a visual opening to the street and the yard, these elements contribute to the “upgrading” of every single corner of the house.

As a result, the pre-existing notion of “hidden”, “bad” parts of a house (the ones without view) is fading. At the same time, an association between the communal yard and the street is created while these two elements function as two different types of passage-road.

In the building, the apartments are connected to the stairwell, which functions as a ‘road’ linking the public street with the public yard. At the same time, the corridor is a transitional space that divides the house and serves as a “road” leading to the exterior of the residence (yard-balcony) as well as the interior.

The public spaces within the house as well as the ones surrounded by the block’s volumes are public collective spaces that encourage social interaction and constitute a criterion around which inhabitants are capable of uniting.

13

MASTERPLANNING

The axis of the park follows the trace of the old railway line along the seaside strip. major poles are created contituting areas of intense activity and exchange with the city.

Sports and tourism activities in Grotta Santa.

Europan 9 City:Siracusa/ Grotta Santa. Subject: ‘’Public space:meanings challenges and limits’’, 2007

15

PLANNING NEW MANIPULATIONS OF EMPTY ZONES

Masterplanning City:Kilkis Subject: ‘’zones of public roots’’, 2007

17

RESIDENTIAL SUSTAINABLE

House schemes City:Thessaloniki, Subject: working accomodation in a new suburban area. , 2011

19

PLANNING

Proposal City:Thessaloniki, Subject: working accomodation in a new suburban area. , 2011

21

PLANNING AND SUPERVISION

Client City:Athens Subject: 2 storey building/puplic and private. , 2010 23

PLANNING AND SUPERVISION

Client City:Athens Subject: 4 storey building accomodation, 2003

25

PLANNING

Client City:Athens Subject: 3 building accomodation, 2012

27

PLANNING AND SUPERVISION

Client City:Athens Subject: 4 storey accomodation block, 1999 29

PUBLIC PLANNING AND SUPERVISION

Client City:Athens Subject: Office building 2010

31

A/4

PLANNING AND SUPERVISION

ΙΔΙΟΚΤΗΣΙΑ ΑΓΝΩΣΤΟΥ

A/1

ΙΔΙΟΚΤΗΣΙΑ ΑΓΝΩΣΤΟΥ

-1,51

Λ -1,33

Ι

Κ ΧΩΡΟΣ ΦΥΤΕΥΣΗΣ

-1,00

Θ

-1,80

-1,00

ΘΕΣΗ ΣΤΑΘ/ΣΗΣ ΘΣ29 Ε= 11,25τ.μ.

-1,68

Η

ΠΑ ΡΑΜ

ΠΡΟΣ

ΧΩΡΟΣ ΦΥΤΕΥΣΗΣ

20% ΕΙΟ ΥΠΟΓ

-0,10 -0,30

ΧΩΡΟΣ ΦΥΤΕΥΣΗΣ -0,10

ΙΔΙΟΚΤΗΣΙΑ ΑΓΝΩΣΤΟΥ

ΑΡΜΟΣ ΑΕΡΙΣΜΟΣ ΥΠΟΓΕΙΟΥ

Θ12

Π25

Π26

ΙΔΙΟΚΤΗΣΙΑ ΑΓΝΩΣΤΟΥ

Π24

Π23

Π22

ΚΑΤΑΣΤΗΜΑ Ι-Κ3 Ε= 63,63 τ.μ.

Θ17

1/Π

-0,40

-0,10

Π21

-1,35

Π34

Π35 Π36

Π38

Χ3

Π27 ±0,00

Χ5

Θ6

A/3

-0,25

ΚΑΤΑΣΤΗΜΑ Ι-Κ5 Ε= 28,11 τ.μ.

Η/Χ

ΧΩΡΟΣ ΦΥΤΕΥΣΗΣ Π20

A/3

Π37

ΚΤΙΡΙΟ Β

Π29

Π19

W.C.H.

Θ19

Θ7

Π28

ΚΑΤΑΣΤΗΜΑ Ι-Κ2 Ε= 123,52 τ.μ.

Ζ

Θ8

ΚΑΤΑΣΤΗΜΑ Ι-Κ4 Ε= 14,48 τ.μ.

Χ2

-1,72

Π30

Θ5

±0,00

Χ6

Θ15

-1,67

Π33

Π32

-1,30

Π17

Π18

W.C.H.

W.C.

Θ11

W.C.

W.C.H.

ΘΕΣΗ ΣΤΑΘ/ΣΗΣ ΘΣ30 Ε=11,25τ.μ.

Θ13

Θ14

1/Π

Π31

Θ16

Ε

ΙΔΙΟΚΤΗΣΙΑ ΑΓΝΩΣΤΟΥ

-0,45

W.C.H.

Θ20 Π39

-0,10

ΧΩΡΟΣ ΦΥΤΕΥΣΗΣ

Π16

Π15

ΑΡΜΟΣ

Δ -1,79

Π14

Μ Ν

A/4

ΚΛΙΜΑΚΟΣΤΑΣΙΟ Ε= 46,82τ.μ.

Π12

Π13

Θ18

ΑΦΑΙΡΟΥΜΕΝΟ ΤΜΗΜΑ

±0,00

-1,25

-1,57

Θ4 Π11

Θ9

Ξ

Χ4

Γ

Θ10

-1,33

Π10

ΙΔΙΟΚΤΗΣΙΑ ΑΓΝΩΣΤΟΥ

ΙΔΙΟΚΤΗΣΙΑ ΑΓΝΩΣΤΟΥ

3/Π

4/Π

Π9

ΚΑΤΑΣΤΗΜΑ Ι-Κ1 Ε= 378,85 τ.μ.

A/2

A/2

Χ1

Π8

ΚΤΙΡΙΟ Α

±0,00

-0,10

Θ1 Π2

Ο.Γ.

Π3

Π5

Π1

Π4

-0,10

Π7 Θ2

Θ3 Π6

Ο.Γ. ΑΡΜΟΣ

Ρ.Γ.

ΕΙΣΟΔΟΣ ΑΥΤΟΚΙΝΗΤΩΝ

ΕΙΣΟΔΟΣ ΠΕΖΩΝ-ΑΝΑΠΗΡΩΝ

ΧΩΡΟΣ ΦΥΤΕΥΣΗΣ

ΠΡΑΣΙΑ 6.00μ

Ρ.Γ.

Α

Β

-0,70

-0,78

ΛΕΩΦΟΡΟΣ ΗΡΑΚΛΕΙΟΥ Πλατος 44,00 μ A/1

Client City:Athens Subject: Office building 2010

ΧΩΡΟΣ ΦΥΤΕΥΣΗΣ

ΑΡΜΟΣ

33

PLANNING AND SUPERVISION

ΙΔΙΟΚΤΗΣΙΑ ΑΓΝΩΣΤΟΥ

A/1

ΙΔΙΟΚΤΗΣΙΑ ΑΓΝΩΣΤΟΥ

Λ Κ

Ι

Θ

Η

ΙΔΙΟΚΤΗΣΙΑ ΑΓΝΩΣΤΟΥ

ΙΔΙΟΚΤΗΣΙΑ ΑΓΝΩΣΤΟΥ

2%

2%

1/Π

2%

2%

+4,50

A/3

2%

Ζ

2%

2%

1,20

+5,40

ΙΔΙΟΚΤΗΣΙΑ ΑΓΝΩΣΤΟΥ

ΑΛΟΥΜΙΝΙΟ

1/Π 0,17

+11,40 ΕΜΦΑΝΕΣ ΜΠΕΤΟΝ

3,03

3,20

2%

ΣΟΥΒΑΣ

3,03

3,20

ΜΟΝΩΣΗ

0,17 0,40

1,00 0,40

+15,00 +14,60

ΑΡΜΟΣ

Δ

ΓΥΑΛΙ

2%

2%

2%

16,00

0,17

+3,75

+5,20

+5,20

+8,20

16,00

2%

Ε

+17,20

+16,00

A/3

2%

Θ3

Μ

3,03

Ν

0,25

6,50

Η/Χ

Θ11

Π10

ΣΟΥΒΑΣ

4,85

5,00

Η/Χ

2%

2%

A/4

3,20

+6,40 +5,40 +5,00

+5,00

Π11

Θ12

ΓΥΑΛΙ ΑΛΟΥΜΙΝΙΟ

ΑΡΜΟΣ

2,30

2,60

-2,60

οριστικό έδαφος

Χ6

5,00

-1,20

ΑΦΑΙΡΟΥΜΕΝΟ ΤΜΗΜΑ

1,21

οριστικό έδαφος

φυσικό έδαφος

Χ5

-0,10

0,10

0,70

70

±0,00

-0,10

0,20

±0,00

φυσικό έδαφος

ΓΡΑΦΕΙΟ Α-Γ4 Ε= 45,00τ.μ.

ΓΡΑΦΕΙΟ Α-Γ5 Ε= 36,10τ.μ.

Π1

ΚΛΙΜΑΚΟΣΤΑΣΙΟ Ε= 52,20τ.μ. Θ1

Ξ

Χ1

W.C.H.

Γ

Θ2

Θ18

Θ17 Θ9

W.C.H.

Θ10

Θ4 Θ5

ΑΦΑΙΡΟΥΜΕΝΟ ΤΜΗΜΑ Θ8 Θ7

ΙΔΙΟΚΤΗΣΙΑ ΑΓΝΩΣΤΟΥ

3/Π

Θ16

W.C.H.

ΙΔΙΟΚΤΗΣΙΑ ΑΓΝΩΣΤΟΥ

ΑΠΟΘΗΚΗ

Θ15

Θ14

W.C.H. Θ19

Η/Χ

2%

Θ6

4/Π

Π9 Π8

Θ20

2%

Η/Χ

Θ13 Π7

5,00

W.C.H. Θ21

A/2

A/2

Θ22

ΓΡΑΦΕΙΟ Α-Γ3 Ε= 60,96τ.μ.

Χ4

Client City:Athens Subject: Office building 2010

Π2

ΓΡΑΦΕΙΟ Α-Γ1 Ε= 80,43τ.μ.

ΓΡΑΦΕΙΟ Α-Γ2 Ε= 79,72τ.μ.

Χ2

Χ3

Π3

Π4

Ο.Γ.

Π5

Π6

Ο.Γ.

35 ΠΡΑΣΙΑ 6.00μ

PLANNING AND SUPERVISION

ΜΟΝΩΣΗ

ΜΟΝΩΣΗ

0,17

ΜΟΝΩΣΗ

διαμορφ

διαμορφωμένο έδαφος

φυσικό έδαφος

Client City:Athens Subject: Office building 2010

ΑΡΜΟΣ

φυσικό έδ

37

PLANNING

Municipality City:Messologi Subject: Town Hall 2003

2010

39

PLANNING

Municipality City:Messologi Subject: Town Hall 2003

41

PLANNING

Municipality City:Athens, Subject:Bus terminal 2003

43

RE-FURBISMENT

Municipality City:Athens, Subject:Multipupose building, 2002

45

PLANNING

Military City:Athens, Subject: Extesion of exhisting building,2004

47

HOUSING

Client City:Athens,Subject: Housing for three families 2000

49

PLANNING AND SUPERVISION

Client City:Athens,Subject: Housing for a family , 2010

51

PLANNING AND SUPERVISION

Client City:Athens,Subject: Housing for a family , 2010

53

PLANNING AND SUPERVISION

Client City:Athens,Subject: Housing for a family , 2010 55

PLANNING

Client City:Korinthos,,Subject: Weakend house for a family , 2011 57

PLANNING

Proposal City:Athens, Subject: House for a family2002

Proposal

59

PLANNING

Proposal City:Athens, Subject: House for a family2002

61

PLANNING AND SUPERVISION

Client City:Loutsa, Subject: House for a family2002

63

PLANNING AND SUPERVISION

Client City:Nea Makri Subject: House for a family2000

65

PLANNING AND SUPERVISION

Client City:Nea Makri Subject: House for a family2000

67

LANDSCAPE

Private City:Kalamos,Subject: Mosaic, 2011

69

MATERIALITY

Private City:Kalamos,Subject: Marble , 2011 71

MATERIALLITY

Private City:Kalamos,Subject: Marble , 2011 73

PLANNING

Proposal City:Athens,Subject:Playground +Wood structures , 2009 75

03,0+

00,1+

55,0+

70,0+

57,0+

Τ.Ο 567

Τ.Ο 757

ΣΑΙΛΗΜ ΣΗΝΙΚΚΟΚ

50,0+

21,0+

)ΣΟΜΟΡΔΟΖΕΠ(

ΥΟΚΙΝΕΓΥΕ ΥΟΚΡΑΜ

ΥΟΙΤΑΛΛΑ

70,0+

03,1+

Τ.Ο 467

54,0+

02,0+

00,0±

Τ.Ο 737

Τ.Ο 647

ΥΟΙΤΝΥΟΖΕΠΑΡΤ

Τ.Ο 247

PLANNING

Χ ΟΣΥΡ ΑΡΩΛ

)ΣΟΜΟΡΔΟΖΕΠ (

Proposal City:Athens,Subject:Skate-park , 2003

77

INTERIORS INDUSTRIAL DESIGN

Client City:Athens,Subject:Furniture & accessories design, 2002

79

FURNITURE AND PAINTING

Proposal City:Athens,Subject:Chocolate shop 2002

81

DECORATION

Proposal City:Athens,Subject: Fireplace 2010

Client City:Athens,Subject:Flat 2012

83

DECORATION

Client City:Athens,Subject:Bar -Interior/Athens 2007

85

SCULPTURE

Proposal City:Athens,Subject:Lighting in courtyard, 2008

87

RE-SEARCH

89

example of block of flats in Athens/ re search drawing 1 τοιχος

τοιχος

movement

advertisment

sound

space

sky

parking

τοιχος

motion

polution

τοιχος

diagrams of living space

τοιχος

τοιχος solid

τοιχος

τοιχος ων.. e? sτην εποχή εποχή των των παγετών παγετώνω ν..

nature

ABΓ rain/horn

shadow

flats

ex-manager

ex neibrohood

sports

91

THE -cross- HOUSE

93

THE-e-HOUSE

courtyard

95