EURER#5 Including Institutions: Boosting Resilience in Europe

Page 77

Box 2.6  Description of the variables used in the heatmap Resilience: • Convergence: Indicates whether the average growth rate between 2004 and 2014 was above, close to or below the growth rate implied by the OLS estimation of β-convergence (Annex 6). • Output half-life: Number of quarters required for an output shock to reduce to half its initial value. • Output volatility: Standard deviation of the business cycle component of output log deviation of GDP from its trend. • Unemployment half-life: Number of quarters required for a shock to unemployment to reduce to half its initial value. • Unemployment volatility: Standard deviation of the unemployment rate. • Income duration: Number of years required for bottom 20 household income to reach it’s turning point after the Global Financial Crisis. • Income depth: Maximum drop of bottom 20 household income after the Global Financial Crisis. Note: For Germany and Croatia no information on income duration and depth is available.

Optimal currency area indicator: • Business cycle synchronicity: Correlation coefficient of a country’s business cycle with the eurozone business cycle. Policy and institutional variables: Low income protection: • Income inequality: Ratio of household income at the 20th to the income at the 80th percentile of the income distribution. • Pass-through: Response of the incomes of poorer households to periods of contraction. A response greater than one implies that poorer households see their incomes contract more than the average household during these periods. Estimates cover the period of 2004 – 2016 using EU-SILC data. • Transfer/tax system efficiency: Percentage reduction or increase in poverty as a result of the fiscal system. Estimates are calculated using EUROMOD and the EU-SILC, for the 2007 income year. Poverty is measured using national at-risk-of-poverty measures. • Social protection targeting: percent of social assistance expenditure going to the bottom 40 percent in 2008, using EU-SILC data. For more detail on the construction of this indicator, see World Bank (2015). Note: For Germany, Poland and Sweden no information on the variable “pass-through” is available, for Germany and Croatia no information on the variable “social protection targeting” is available.

Labor market conditions: • ALMP/PLMP — Expenditure on active/passive labor market programs (as percentage of GDP). • CBC: Collective bargaining coverage (in 2008). • EPL: Value of the OECD’s employment protection legislation indicator for permanent contracts. • Part-time work: percent of employers conducting part-time work. From the EU Labor Force Survey. • Firing costs: Weighted average of notice and severance period for redundancy dismissal (in weeks) from the World Bank’s Ease of Doing Business using an average dismissal across tenure periods. • Wage flexibility: Response coefficient of wage to unemployment. Note: For Bulgaria and Romania, no information on the variable “EPL” is available, for Croatia and Lithuania values for 2014 or 2015 were used (rather than period averages).

Private sector conditions: • Ease of doing business: World Bank’s Ease of Doing Business score (aggregate measure). • Product market regulation: Scores of the OECD’s “Barrier to Entrepreneurship” indicator. • Enforcing contracts: Scores of the World Bank’s “Enforcing Contracts” indicator. • Insolvency procedures: Scores of the World Bank’s “Resolving Insolvency” indicator. Note: For Croatia, no information on the variable “Ease of Doing Business” was used in the estimations.

Trust in institutions: • Aggregate index constructed from replies to Eurobarometer’s survey questions assessing the trust in a country’s institutions.

82  |  Including institutions: Boosting resilience in Europe


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook

Articles inside

Figure 2.20 Trust in institutions (Eurobarometer)

3min
page 104

Table A8.1 Country exchange rate groupings

3min
page 135

Table A7.6 Unemployment volatility and institutional variables

3min
page 134

Box 2.15 Screening and selecting measures of trust

3min
page 102

Box 2.14 Poland’s successful weathering of the crisis

3min
page 101

Figure 2.9 Ease of doing business score and output resilience

3min
page 96

Box 2.4 Zimbabwe’s attempts to control the real exchange rate

3min
page 79

Box 2.3 Eurozone institutional “architecture”

3min
page 78

Figure 2.3 Correlation patterns across national business cycles (quarterly GDP, 2000–2017)

3min
page 85

Figure 2.10 Cross-country differences in ease of doing business scores and their changes over time

3min
page 97

Figure 2.2 Population movements contribute little to economic convergence

2min
page 77

Box 2.1 The European Monetary System

8min
pages 72-74

Figure O.5 Shift in the geography of those under €23 per day towards Southern Europe. Half of this population continues to be found in Central Europe however

2min
page 21

Figure 2.1 Conceptual framework: Shocks the real exchange rate, institutions and inclusive growth

3min
page 71

Convergence, business cycle synchronization and the real exchange rate

2min
page 28

Acknowledgements

0
page 9

Table O.1: “Heatmap” of outcomes and institutions that support resilience in the EU (2004–14)

3min
page 27

Fiscal policy

3min
page 61

Countries and Regions

1min
page 10
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.