The Long Shadow of Informality

Page 100

70

C H A P T ER 2

T H E L O NG S HA D O W O F I N F O R MA L I T Y

ANNEX 2A Estimation methodologies This annex describes the estimation methodologies used to construct the concerning informality measures. A detailed data description is listed in table 2B.7.

The MIMIC model To estimate the size of the informal sector in percent of official GDP with the MIMIC model, this study closely follows Schneider, Buehn, and Montenegro (2010) and includes six causes and three indicators used in their study.24 The six cause variables used are (1) size of government (general government final consumption expenditure as a percent of GDP, from United Nations data spliced with WDI); (2) share of direct taxation (direct taxes in percent of overall taxation, from WDI); (3) fiscal freedom index from Heritage Foundation; (4) business freedom index from Heritage Foundation; (5) unemployment rate and GDP per capita to capture the state of the economy (from WDI, and GDP per capita spliced with World Economic Outlook database [WEO]); and (6) government effectiveness (Worldwide Governance Indicators). The three indicator variables include (1) growth rate of GDP per capita (from WDI, spliced with WEO); (2) the labor force participation rate (people over age 15 economically active in percent of population; from WDI, spliced with Haver Analytics); and (3) currency as a ratio of M0 (currency outside the banks) over M1 (International Monetary Fund International Financial Statistics and Haver Analytics). The estimation results are shown in table 2B.8. The model specification that ensures maximum data coverage, which is shown in column (5) of table 2B.8, is used to generate the MIMIC index of the share of informal output relative to official GDP ( ῆ t ). Then an additional benchmarking procedure is carried out where t is converted into absolute values of the informal sector ( ηˆ t ) using the following equation:25

ηˆ t =

ηɶ t * η2000 , ηɶ 2000

(2A.1)

where t denotes year, ῆ 2000 is the value of the estimated index in the base year 2000, and η*2000 is the exogenous estimate (base value) of the shadow economies in 2000. Whereas the estimates (ῆt ) determine the movement of the absolute values of the informal sector * over time, the base values η2000 decide the rankings of the countries’ informal sector within the sample in year 2000. The base values η*2000 are taken from Schneider (2007) or, for another 10 economies, from Schneider, Buehn, and Montenegro (2010).

The DGE model In the model of Elgin and Oztunali (2012), an infinitely lived representative household is endowed with K 0 units of productive capital and a total of Ht > 0 units of time. The 24 MIMIC is a type of structural equation model (SEM). The estimation of a SEM with latent variables can be done by means of LISREL (used by Schneider, Buehn, and Montenegro 2010), SPSS, and Stata. Here, Stata is used. 25 Calibration is performed separately for each country. Following Schneider, Buehn, and Montenegro (2010), the MIMIC index has been adjusted to the positive range by adding a positive constant.


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook

Articles inside

References

17min
pages 344-353

Annex 6A Policies and informality

3min
pages 323-324

Fiscal measures

2min
page 301

Data and methodology

2min
page 300

6.1 Financial development and the informal economy

9min
pages 290-294

6.8 Informality after labor market reforms in EMDEs

2min
page 313

Conclusion

2min
page 271

References

20min
pages 272-284

Conclusion

2min
page 319

Latin America and the Caribbean

2min
page 251

South Asia

2min
page 260

Sub-Saharan Africa

4min
pages 264-265

Middle East and North Africa

2min
page 255

Europe and Central Asia

2min
page 246

East Asia and Pacific

2min
page 241

Informality in EMDEs

2min
page 237

References

24min
pages 222-234

4D.7 Regression: Changes in informality and poverty reduction

2min
page 208

competition

2min
page 206

4D.8 Regression: Changes in informality and improvement in income inequality

1min
page 209

4D.14 Regression: Developmental challenges and DGE-based output informality in EMDEs

5min
pages 216-218

Annex 4C Bayesian model averaging approach

4min
pages 200-201

4D.4 Regression: Labor productivity of formal and informal firms 4D.5 Regression: Labor productivity of formal firms facing informal

1min
page 205

Annex 4B Regression analysis

2min
page 199

Annex 4A Meta-regression analysis

2min
page 198

Informality and SDGs related to human development

2min
page 191

Informality and SDGs related to infrastructure

2min
page 193

4.3 Informality, poverty, and income inequality

5min
pages 180-182

Informality and institutions

2min
page 189

Finding the needle in the haystack: The most robust correlates

2min
page 195

Conclusion

1min
page 197

Informality and economic correlates

2min
page 179

4.2 Casting a shadow: Productivity in formal and informal firms

4min
pages 167-168

Links between informality and development challenges

2min
page 165

4.1 Informality and wage inequality

8min
pages 158-161

References

6min
pages 147-152

Conclusion

2min
page 136

Data and methodology

2min
page 129

Literature review: Linkages between formal and informal sectors

6min
pages 126-128

References

13min
pages 115-122

2B.9 World Values Survey

1min
page 114

2B.8 MIMIC model estimation results, 1993-2018

1min
page 113

Future research directions

2min
page 54

Database of informality measures

14min
pages 81-86

References

10min
pages 55-62

Key findings and policy messages

6min
pages 36-38

Definition of informality

4min
pages 79-80

Conclusion

2min
page 99

Annex 2A Estimation methodologies

9min
pages 100-103

16 Informality indicators and entrepreneurial conditions in Sub-Saharan

2min
page 35
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.