The Long Shadow of Informality

Page 167

T H E L O NG S HA D O W O F I N F O R MA L I T Y

C H A P T ER 4

137

BOX 4.2 Casting a shadow: Productivity in formal and informal firms

Labor productivity in the average informal firm in emerging market and developing economies (EMDEs) is only one-quarter of that of the average firm operating in the formal sector. Moreover, firms in the formal sector that face informal competition are, on average, only three-quarters as productive as those that do not. This suggests that competition from the informal sector can erode formal firms’ market share and resources available to boost productivity as they shoulder the costs of regulatory compliance. More effective governance and stronger control of corruption can help mitigate these effects. Introduction The differential in labor productivity between formal and informal firms is well established in the literature (Loayza and Rigolini 2006; Oviedo 2009). However, there is mixed evidence on the impact of a large informal sector on formal firms’ labor productivity.a Some studies suggest that the informal and formal sectors operate independently so that there are no productivity spillovers (La Porta and Shleifer 2014). Others report that competition from the informal sector may erode the profitability of firms in the formal sector, limiting their resources to enhance firm productivity. The aggregate effect varies with country characteristics (Amin and Okou 2020). Against this backdrop, this box documents the productivity gap between formal and informal firms and their interactions. Specifically, it addresses the following questions: •

How large is the differential in labor productivity between formal and informal firms?

To what extent are formal firms exposed to informal competition?

How does informal competition affect the labor productivity of formal firms?

Productivity differential between formal and informal firms Literature review. The literature documents that informal firms in EMDEs are less productive than formal firms, with labor productivity gaps ranging between 30 and 216 percent (La Porta and Shleifer 2008; Perry et al. 2007). The Note: This box was prepared by Mohammad Amin and Cedric Okou. The box closely follows box 3.3 in the January 2019 Global Economic Prospects report. a. Gonzalez and Lamanna (2007) show that formal firms affected by head-to-head competition with informal firms largely resemble them. Heredia et al. (2017) find a negative effect on the innovation performance of formal companies from the competition with informal firms. Mendi and Costamagna (2017) find an inverted-U relationship between propensity to innovate and competitive pressure from firms in the informal sector.


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook

Articles inside

References

17min
pages 344-353

Annex 6A Policies and informality

3min
pages 323-324

Fiscal measures

2min
page 301

Data and methodology

2min
page 300

6.1 Financial development and the informal economy

9min
pages 290-294

6.8 Informality after labor market reforms in EMDEs

2min
page 313

Conclusion

2min
page 271

References

20min
pages 272-284

Conclusion

2min
page 319

Latin America and the Caribbean

2min
page 251

South Asia

2min
page 260

Sub-Saharan Africa

4min
pages 264-265

Middle East and North Africa

2min
page 255

Europe and Central Asia

2min
page 246

East Asia and Pacific

2min
page 241

Informality in EMDEs

2min
page 237

References

24min
pages 222-234

4D.7 Regression: Changes in informality and poverty reduction

2min
page 208

competition

2min
page 206

4D.8 Regression: Changes in informality and improvement in income inequality

1min
page 209

4D.14 Regression: Developmental challenges and DGE-based output informality in EMDEs

5min
pages 216-218

Annex 4C Bayesian model averaging approach

4min
pages 200-201

4D.4 Regression: Labor productivity of formal and informal firms 4D.5 Regression: Labor productivity of formal firms facing informal

1min
page 205

Annex 4B Regression analysis

2min
page 199

Annex 4A Meta-regression analysis

2min
page 198

Informality and SDGs related to human development

2min
page 191

Informality and SDGs related to infrastructure

2min
page 193

4.3 Informality, poverty, and income inequality

5min
pages 180-182

Informality and institutions

2min
page 189

Finding the needle in the haystack: The most robust correlates

2min
page 195

Conclusion

1min
page 197

Informality and economic correlates

2min
page 179

4.2 Casting a shadow: Productivity in formal and informal firms

4min
pages 167-168

Links between informality and development challenges

2min
page 165

4.1 Informality and wage inequality

8min
pages 158-161

References

6min
pages 147-152

Conclusion

2min
page 136

Data and methodology

2min
page 129

Literature review: Linkages between formal and informal sectors

6min
pages 126-128

References

13min
pages 115-122

2B.9 World Values Survey

1min
page 114

2B.8 MIMIC model estimation results, 1993-2018

1min
page 113

Future research directions

2min
page 54

Database of informality measures

14min
pages 81-86

References

10min
pages 55-62

Key findings and policy messages

6min
pages 36-38

Definition of informality

4min
pages 79-80

Conclusion

2min
page 99

Annex 2A Estimation methodologies

9min
pages 100-103

16 Informality indicators and entrepreneurial conditions in Sub-Saharan

2min
page 35
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.