Bridging the Technological Divide

Page 70

19. To control for some of the differences in samples, stratification, and economic structure when comparing countries in the sample, dummies for sector, firm size, and formality are used to ­calculate correlations and different cross-country estimates. 20. Cirera et al. (2020) describe the design features implemented to minimize measurement bias and errors. 21. Comin and Mestieri (2018) present the reference year of invention for these technologies: ­electricity (1882); personal computers (PCs) (1973); cell phones (1973); and the internet (1983). 22. Hallward-Driemeier and Nayyar (2017) provide further discussions on the emergence of Industry 4.0. Although some of these technologies, such as AI, have been available since the 1960s, they have been increasingly available in recent years. 23. While almost all firms use mobile phones, clearly benefiting from an extraordinary process of leapfrogging, only a small share has reported no outages in electricity. There is a large gap in access to generators, particularly for small firms.

References Akerman, A., I. Gaarder, and M. Mogstad. 2015. “The Skill Complementarity of Broadband Internet.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 130 (4): 1781–824. Atkin, D., A. K. Khandelwal, and A. Osman. 2017. “Exporting and Firm Performance: Evidence from a Randomized Experiment.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 132 (2): 551–615. Bartel, A., C. Ichniowski, and K. Shaw. 2007. “How Does Information Technology Affect Productivity? Plant-Level Comparisons of Product Innovation, Process Improvement, and Worker Skills.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 122 (4): 1721–58. Bresnahan, T. F., E. Brynjolfsson, and L. M. Hitt. 2002. “Information Technology, Workplace Organization, and the Demand for Skilled Labor: Firm-Level Evidence.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 117 (1): 339–76. Brynjolfsson, E., and L. M. Hitt. 2000. “Beyond Computation: Information Technology, Organizational Transformation and Business Performance.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 14 (4): 23–48. Bustos, P., B. Caprettini, and J. Ponticelli. 2016. “Agricultural Productivity and Structural Transformation: Evidence from Brazil.” American Economic Review 106 (6): 1320–65. Cirera, X., C. Comin, M. Cruz, and K. M. Lee. 2020. “Anatomy of Technology in the Firm.” NBER Working Paper 28080, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA. Comin, D. 2000. “An Uncertainty-Driven Theory of the Productivity Slowdown in Manufacturing.” PhD thesis, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA. Comin, D., and M. Mestieri. 2018. “If Technology Has Arrived Everywhere, Why Has Income Diverged?” American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics 10 (3):137–78. Demsetz, H. 1997. “The Firm in Economic Theory: A Quiet Revolution.” American Economic Review 87 (2): 426–29. DiNardo, J. E., and J.-S. Pischke. 1997. “The Returns to Computer Use Revisited: Have Pencils Changed the Wage Structure Too?” Quarterly Journal of Economics 112 (1): 291–303. Duflo, E., M. Kremer, and J. Robinson. 2011. “Nudging Farmers to Use Fertilizer: Theory and Experimental Evidence from Kenya.” American Economic Review 101 (6): 2350–90. Foster, A. D., and M. R. Rosenzweig. 1995. “Learning by Doing and Learning from Others: Human Capital and Technical Change in Agriculture.” Journal of Political Economy 103 (6): 1176–1209. Foster, A. D., and M. R. Rosenzweig. 1996. “Technical Change and Human-Capital Returns and Investments: Evidence from the Green Revolution.” American Economic Review 86 (4): 931–53. Foster, A. D., and M. R. Rosenzweig. 2010. “Microeconomics of Technology Adoption.” Annual Review of Economics 2 (1): 395–424.

44

Bridging the Technological Divide


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook

Articles inside

A.1 Number of Establishments Surveyed, by Strata

4min
pages 236-237

7.5 The Difference between Vouchers and Grants

8min
pages 219-222

Notes

5min
pages 224-225

Corporation (KOTEC

2min
page 217

References

7min
pages 226-229

7.3 Agriculture Extension: The Case of Embrapa

6min
pages 214-216

Instruments to Support Technology Upgrading at the Firm Level

2min
page 209

Adoption of Technology

6min
pages 211-213

7.1 Digital Platforms Are Prone to Market Concentration and Dominance

9min
pages 198-201

References

6min
pages 192-194

6.1 Specific Barriers to the Use of Digital Platforms

2min
page 176

Surrounded by Digital Infrastructure

0
page 174

Factual Evidence on Drivers of and Obstacles to Technology Adoption

4min
pages 172-173

References

8min
pages 161-166

Notes

2min
page 160

Technology and Resilience

2min
page 146

Digital Technologies

2min
page 138

Introduction

1min
page 137

References

4min
pages 134-136

4.10 Technology Sophistication Contributes to Wage Inequality within Firms

1min
page 132

Introduction

1min
page 121

References

2min
pages 117-120

Functions Manually

1min
page 100

Technology Differences across and within Sectors

2min
page 96

Introduction

1min
page 95

References

3min
pages 93-94

Summing Up

2min
page 91

Notes

2min
page 92

Other Technology Facts

2min
page 86

Business Functions Varies across Firm Size

1min
page 83

Introduction

1min
page 73

Using the FAT Data to Understand Some of the Limitations of Standard Measures of Technology

4min
pages 63-64

References

4min
pages 70-72

Measuring Adoption and Use of Technology by Firms

2min
page 48

References

3min
pages 42-46

Opening the Black Box: The Firm-level Adoption of Technology (FAT) Survey

4min
pages 50-51

Introduction

1min
page 47

Notes

2min
page 41

Technology (FAT) Survey

1min
page 52
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.