Strategic Investment Funds

Page 144

118

| Strategic Investment Funds

as mentioned previously, set the investment policy; however, it delegates the determination, monitoring, and review of the investment strategy to the fund’s management body (NTMA), which does so by producing an ad hoc investment strategy document published on the website.9 In conformity with the practices of PCFs, a mixed capital SIF such as ACP, Marguerite, and India’s National Investment and Infrastructure Fund (NIIF) usually details its investment strategy within its private placement memorandum.

KEY ACTORS IN THE INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK The formulation of the investment policy is a function of the delegated governance structure of a SIF; that is, the policy is constructed by the owner or (by delegation) the board. The SIF’s investment policy is constructed like that of SWFs, for which a common governance arrangement is for the board to define the investment policy of the fund on behalf of the owner (Alsweilem and Rietveld 2017). Such an arrangement, for instance, is seen in NSIA’s model, in which the board of directors issues the NIF’s investment policy statement (NSIA 2019), or in FONSIS’s case as referenced earlier. Frequently, the manager may also be involved in providing input into the investment policy, aided by its presence on the board or investment committee (Alsweilem and Rietveld 2017). The SIF’s investment strategy, by contrast, is usually established through an iterative process between the sponsor or board and the manager. A consultative process to develop the strategy may, in some instances, be explicitly required. For example, Articles 40.1, 40.3, and 41.5 of the NTMA Act 2014 require NTMA, as ISIF’s manager, to formulate the investment strategy in consultation with the Minister for Finance and the Minister for Public Expenditure and Reform and with the advice of the NTMA investment committee. Such a process seeks to capitalize on the fund manager’s expertise to design a commercially feasible investment strategy while also ensuring consistency with the policy objectives of the public sponsor. A poorly defined strategy may hinder a SIF’s ability to hire qualified investment professionals, which, in turn, could affect a fund’s performance and limit its ability to crowd in commercial co-investors at the deal level.10 Particularly in mixed capital SIFs that seek commercial co-investment at the fund level, with the fund manager playing a crucial role in the fundraising process, it is highly recommended that the public sponsor involve the fund manager in defining the strategy. For mixed capital SIFs, demonstrating deep expertise and providing concrete visibility on their target sectors and the investment opportunities represent important components of successful fundraising.11 Commercial investors, for instance, may be deterred by a very narrow definition of the target sectors or permissible deal structures, which could restrict the fund’s investment pipeline or undermine its ability to achieve the targeted returns. The prospect of poor fundraising or, if fundraising succeeds, poor returns will deter prospective fund managers, because fees paid to fund managers are customarily linked to both fund size and performance. The public sponsor of a mixed capital SIF must be willing to entertain an open dialogue with the prospective fund manager and embrace some of its investment strategy proposals. Marguerite is a good example in this respect. When the European Investment Bank and other public sponsors decided to launch the first Marguerite fund in 2009, they appointed a newly set up external fund manager, whose chief


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook

Articles inside

References

17min
pages 296-303

Notes

2min
page 295

Staffing and recruitment

2min
page 292

Investment strategy

2min
page 284

Portfolio and track record

2min
page 285

13.2 NSIA-NIF core governance bodies

6min
pages 289-290

Mandate for investment

2min
page 283

12.2 Summary of NIIF Limited’s governance bodies

3min
page 277

Legal structure

2min
page 282

Background and mission

1min
page 281

Governance

2min
page 275

Additionality and multiplier considerations

2min
page 274

12.2 NIIF’s Master Fund structure

4min
pages 272-273

12.3 NIIF’s governance structure

2min
page 276

12.1 NIIF’s anticipated fund size and investors at time of writing

5min
pages 270-271

12.1 NIIF structure

4min
pages 268-269

11.1 Key features of the Luxembourg SCSp

2min
page 264

11.4 Marguerite’s ESG assessment throughout the investment process

4min
pages 265-267

11.3 Summary of Marguerite II’s core bodies and functions

2min
page 263

impact report

4min
pages 246-247

10.6 ISIF Irish Portfolio risk categories

11min
pages 248-252

11.1 Marguerite II’s eligible sectors

6min
pages 257-259

10.4 ISIF investment decision process

1min
page 245

10.4 Summary of ISIF’s governance bodies

2min
page 244

10.1 Structure of NTMA and ISIF

4min
pages 236-237

December 31, 2018

7min
pages 238-240

writing

4min
pages 227-228

9.2 Summary of FONSIS governance bodies

3min
page 229

9.4 FONSIS organizational structure

12min
pages 230-235

9.1 FONSIS’s solar investments

2min
page 223

8.3 Summary of ACP’s governance bodies

2min
page 214

References

6min
pages 202-206

8.1 Breakdown of ACP’s committed capital, by source

1min
page 208

Notes

2min
page 201

7.1 Financial reporting standards of select SIFs B7.7.1 Comprehensive sample of metrics disclosed in ISIF’s economic

2min
page 197

7.6 Core components of disclosure for a strategic investment fund

1min
page 196

mechanisms of disclosure

2min
page 195

Unique features of the transparency and disclosure framework for SIFs

2min
page 198

Legal and regulatory context

2min
page 192

Linaburg-Maduell Transparency Index for SWFs

2min
page 191

guidelines

2min
page 190

Key takeaways

2min
page 200

Introduction

1min
page 185

Global transparency and disclosure requirements

2min
page 186

principles for SWFs

5min
pages 187-188

Investment Fund Managers

2min
page 189

References

2min
pages 182-184

6.7 Investment exit: The case of Marguerite

2min
page 180

The NSIA-NIF example

2min
page 172

6.2 FONSIS: Originating investment opportunities as a project developer

2min
page 173

6.6 Exercising active ownership

2min
page 178

Investment exit

2min
page 179

6.2 NSIA-NIF investment evaluation process and responsibilities

2min
page 175

Investment origination

2min
page 171

6.1 Phases of the SIF’s investment process

1min
page 170

References

3min
pages 167-168

Introduction

1min
page 169

Notes

9min
pages 164-166

Risk management framework: Key concepts Components of the risk management framework

5min
pages 157-158

and key actors

7min
pages 160-162

Key takeaways

2min
page 163

5.4 Investor protection provisions in shareholder agreements

8min
pages 154-156

infrastructure SIFs

7min
pages 150-152

5.1 Investment policy–related guidance within the Santiago Principles

5min
pages 142-143

Components of the investment policy

10min
pages 145-148

Key actors in the investment management framework

2min
page 144

References

3min
pages 138-140

4.7 Typical terms of a limited partnership agreement

6min
pages 133-134

4.5 Indicative RFP content for external manager selection

2min
page 131

4.7 Recruiting an external manager for a SIF: PINAI

5min
pages 129-130

4.6 Staffing the NIIF

2min
page 128

equivalent structure

10min
pages 124-127

4.4 SIF board functions

11min
pages 120-123

Key decision-making bodies and their functions

5min
pages 108-109

Authority

5min
pages 111-112

4.2 Public sponsor ownership functions in a SIF

8min
pages 113-115

4.3 Definition of an independent board member

2min
page 116

4.4 Safeguards for government representatives on SIF boards

2min
page 117

Introduction

1min
page 105

References

5min
pages 101-104

Notes

6min
pages 99-100

Private agreements in setting up a SIF Applicability of other domestic, supranational, and

2min
page 90

3.7 National security legislation: The US example

3min
page 97

3.9 Other laws affecting SIF cross-border activities

3min
page 96

3.6 Legal structure and domicile for a variety of SIFs

2min
page 88

3.5 Most popular domiciles

2min
page 89

3.5 Examples of legal structures used by global SIFs

2min
page 86

3.4 SIFs formed entirely under commercial law

5min
pages 84-85

3.3 Common features of primary SIF legislation: Operational elements

7min
pages 81-83

3.3 Specifying the transfer of state assets into a SIF with the SIF law

2min
page 78

FONSIS

5min
pages 76-77

References

5min
pages 68-70

Notes

6min
pages 66-67

Introduction

1min
page 71

3.1 Santiago Principles: Key legal principles for SWFs

2min
page 72

2.6 Preliminary study for the Green Investment Bank, United Kingdom

3min
page 64

Preparatory studies to establish a SIF

2min
page 63

Limitations of a SIF

2min
page 59

Macrofiscal implications of a SIF

2min
page 57

2.4 Santiago Principles and macroeconomic implications of SWFs

2min
page 58

Challenges to establishing a SIF

2min
page 60

managers

2min
page 56

Issues to consider before establishing a SIF

2min
page 62

2.7 Illustrative list of strategic alliances between global SIFs and SWFs

2min
page 53

funds

2min
page 61

Double bottom line mandate

2min
page 45

2.4 SIF mandates, examples from case studies

2min
page 46

SIF ownership and management models

2min
page 42

2.5 Managing the DBL

2min
page 47

2.6 The additional value of SIFs: Case study examples

5min
pages 50-51

Structure

2min
page 34

2.2 Palestine Investment Fund

2min
page 52

Context

1min
page 27
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.