CITES: Appendix II. National protection status: Information unavailable.
forests (Código Florestal Estadual). If approved, the proposed amendment to the law will allow (upon licensing) the exploitation of second growth forests, regardless of their successional stage and location, to use the wood as fuel in the curing of tobacco. However, this proposal is obviously not based on technical criteria and may have catastrophic consequences in areas where secondary forests predominate. The situation is rapidly worsening, particularly in the region around Santa Cruz do Sul. Here the wood used in the curing of tobacco is extracted principally from native forests. Souza Cruz, one of the largest tobacco companies in the region, has recently announced the installation of a new industrial plant at Santa Cruz do Sul which will significantly increase the company’s capacity for processing tobacco leaves. This measure will require an estimated additional 13,700 tobacco planters in the region to satisfy the plant’s demand for tobacco, which in turn will result in a corresponding increase of agricultural areas to maintain these farmers and in consumption of wood for curing the leaves. Moreover, tobacco industries have recently been given special incentives by the Rio Grande do Sul’s government to install new plants or to increase their investments in the state. Environmental education and public awareness will remain a high priority. Triclaria is an unknown bird for the great majority of the local population. Only rural inhabitants living in farms around primary forest remnants are familiar with the species. Consequently, public awareness and environmental education should be carried out in properties around the largest primary-forest remnants in the region and in elementary schools of communities near these properties. Awareness of urban populations in the region requires a different approach. This target group should be made aware of the situation of forests and wildlife in the interior of the townships, especially the effects of habitat fragmentation. Several species of bird are known to have already vanished from the whole region, and many others are locally threatened, primarily as a result of habitat fragmentation (Bencke 1996). Newspaper articles, lectures, and television interviews should complement the urban public awareness campaign.
Distribution and status: The yellow-naped parrot is patchily distributed along the Pacific (southern) coast of Central America from Chiapas, Mexico to north-western Costa Rica, and on the Caribbean slope from central Honduras to central Nicaragua. No formal, or even anecdotal, data are available for Mexico, although it is presumed to be critical in the Mexican part of the range. There are no reports in Mexico of large flocks as in other Amazona or Aratinga species. Present in at least the low hundreds in southern Guatemala in very disturbed cane and cattle areas. Thurber et al. (1987) also reported diminished numbers in El Salvador. In Honduras, the species exists in very low numbers on the Pacific Slope (Wiedenfeld 1993). It takes refuge for roosting and nesting in the mangroves around the Gulf of Fonseca; this may also be true for the remaining birds in El Salvador. On the Caribbean slope of Honduras, the species is restricted to the areas of Colón and Olancho. The Caribbean subspecies Amazona auropalliata parvipes is still fairly numerous, with an estimated population of approximately 140,000 individuals in 1992 (Wiedenfeld 1993). On the Caribbean slope, the parrot is restricted to relatively undisturbed habitats, including both broad-leaved forest and pine savanna, but shuns cultivated areas and second-growth (Wiedenfeld 1993). The species may possibly be still extant in the Bay Islands, off the Caribbean coast of Honduras, but reports of birds there may represent escaped captive birds. In Nicaragua, the yellow-naped parrot numbers approximately 180,000 individuals (Wiedenfeld 1995). As in Honduras, it occurs on both the Pacific and Caribbean slopes, but not in the southern Central Highlands. Its population density is nearly twice as high on the Caribbean as the Pacific slope (Wiedenfeld 1995). Stiles (1985) reported some reductions in yellow-naped parrot populations in Costa Rica, which he attributed to cage bird trapping. He also mentioned that the species had been extirpated from some areas. Threats: Because of its facility in learning to “talk”, this amazon is a preferred pet by Central Americans. As a result, there is great pressure on its populations for internal trade as pets. The threat of capture for internal trade is believed to be much greater than the threat of capture for external trade (both legal and illegal combined). Especially on the Pacific slope of Central America, where yellownaped parrot populations are already low and human populations are high, the harvest for internal trade may have a very significant effect on the amazon’s populations. In Honduras, those who sell amazons usually demand about US$25 in the field in the Mosquitia, and about US$60 in Tegucigalpa (Wiedenfeld 1993). The daily minimum wage in Honduras is about US$2. Heavy
Accounts for species proposed for consideration for inclusion on the Red List Yellow-naped parrot Amazona auropalliata Contributors: Ernesto Enkerlin-Hoeflich, Celia Valverde, and David A. Wiedenfeld. Conservation status: IUCN: To be considered. Vulnerable A2d.
146