T VOLUME
E
xxn
C
H W ORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE, WORCESTER, MASS., TUESDAY, APRIL 5, 1994
TV
TRADITIONS
Newspeak celebrates the 25 year history of women at WPI This year Newspeak’s Tradition’s Day section celebrates the history of women at WPI. This year, 1994, marks the twenty-fifth year since women were first admitted to WPI. This four-page special section contains several articles from the pages of Tech News and Newspeak which describe the triumphs and tribula tions of women during WPI’s first decade of co-education. As you will see, the WPI community underwent quite a few growing pains as it at tempted to integrate women into what had been a single-sex institution for more than 100 years. The articles in this section chronicle the early discussions and debates as to whether to admit women to WPI, several of the concerns of the first women who enrolled at WPI, and the difficul ties faced by men during the early adjustment years as well as many of the successes women experienced at WPI. We hope you enjoy this col lection and we look forward to the next twenty-five years of changes. -Kevin Parker Associate Editor
PHOTO COURTESY OF PEDDLER '93
Rebeca Handal, a member of last year’s graduating dass, re ceives her diploma at Commencement ’93.
January 11, 1967 Co-Eds At Tech? Trustees To Be Advised in Feb. T he catalogue of Worcester Polytechnic Institute declares that Worcester Tech was founded on a "peddler’s dream" and goes on to explain that this dream was "to interest the local citizens in estab lishing a new school which would prepare young men for the tech nical age he could see fast ap proaching." However, perhaps the phrase "to prepare young men” is -i bit misleading; in actuality John Boynton never restricted his plans for the school to an all men in stitution. His provisions were for a coeducational plant where any student with the necessary quali fications could receive an educa tion in the engineering subjects. T o attest this fact, one need only obtain some of the documents relating to the founding of the school, from which one will gather that the original coeducational plan could (can) be altered at any time by agreement of the board of trustees. But, due to the fact that the question never presented itself in a very pressing manner, no such amendment was ever made. Hence, Worcester Tech is a coeducational i n s t i t u t e — in theory, that is. W here have all the young girls gone? As the story goes, a long time has passed since they have been seen on Tech Hill. In fact, except for a few women students enrolling from time to time in the graduate program, and some female undergraduates taking an occasional course or two, (there has never been a class at Worcester Tech that graduated a woman) the feminine factor at Tech has never risen above zero. There are,, of course, very gooH
reasons for this state of affairs.
First of all, in 1865 there were very few women blacksmiths in the country, especially in the more re fined eastern section of the coun try. For the first decades of the school’s history, no respectable woman would ever think of apply ing to an engineering school, let alone be able to handle the type of curriculum offered. Even in this century, engineering is a little way from appealing to the average college m inded girl. However, per haps this is more a result of tradi tion than an effect of the present day engineering situation. Today there are definitely areas of inter est to women in the fields of en gineering. Women take engineer ing degrees at such colleges and universities as M .I.T., Lowell Tech, Cornell University and others. Yet the percentage of women engineers is still very small. It has been estimated that one half of one percent of the engineers in our country are women. Let us say that the admissions office of Worcester Tech was given the task of following a program of encour aging g*rls to apply to Worcester Tech. In an average year, assum ing that the number of women engineers is a good indication of the interest among high school girls in this area of education, Tech might hope to receive 30 in quiries, and as few as seven or eight applications from girls. W ould the admission of seven or eight girls to the class of 1972 warrant the expense of providing the necessary accommodations for them? How would a student body of over i400 men accept them? Would the faculty have to make any adjustment to women stu dents? These are questions which are now being debated by the faculty and administration, in an attempt to provide the board of trustees with advice and opinions when they meet for their regular Executive Committee m eeting on
February 11 to consider this issue (would you believe along with parietal hours?). For those interested in statistics: There have been 4 letters of in quiry and two applications to Worcester Tech by girls so far this year. In addition 11 girls have been present during visits to high schools by admissions officers from Tech.
February 23, 1966
Coeducation: Coming Trend Washington, (C P S )— “There is no unique advantage in separate education for men and w om en,” W illiam H. C. Prentice, president of Wheaton C ollege, told a W ash ington area alumni m eeting this w eek. W heaton College is one of the many sm all colleges for w om en in ! the N ew England area. The school Is located in Norton, Mass., about 35 m iles southwest of Boston, and has a student enrollm ent of just under 1,000.
Prentice said he would be sur prised indeed il separate schools for men and women were still in existence in 50 years. “To be honest, I am surprised even today to find so many young women choosing to study In an all women’s college,” he added. Prentice said one possibility was that Wheaton and other girl’s schools might become co-educa tional. “We have no plans in that direction at present, however,” he added.
May 17, 1967
Coeducation Loses in D ebate O n P are n ts' Day, M ay 13, th e Tech would result in the oppres D eb atin g Society held a p a rlia sion of two minorities: slobs and m en tary d e b a te in A lden H all. swearers. In the presence of fe I 'n d e r discussion was the q u es males, they would have to spruce tio n: “S hould W .P .I. becom e co up their slovenly appearance and ed?" F o u r m em bers of the so clean up their language. Thus ciety a rg u ed the issue, tak in g roles , would end two great T ech tra as m em bers o l P arliam en t. Each ditions. speaker w as lim ited to ten m in Warren Bentley completed the utes. opposition’s attack. He said that it O n th e affirm ative side, Rafik was not valid to call M .I.T. a co R ath iw alla cited th e fact th a t educational institute since the en most of th e b e tte r schools in th e rollment ratio is 6,000 men to 100 c o u n try a re co-ed. o r at least affil women. He declared that opening ia ted w ith a college of the o p p o W.P.I. to women would be eco
site sex. He said that separate education is an anachronism in a world where equality and inte gration of the sexes prevail. Also arguing for co-education at Tech was Bruce Denson. H e pointed out that of the top three engineering schools in the East, M.I.T., R.P.I., and W.P.I., only W.P.I. is all men and W.P.I. is rated third. He said that college is supposed to be the preparation of a student for life and marriage, and that a single-sexed school can provide neither. T he opposition to Tech’s sexual integration came up with a color ful and convincing argument. Steve Leece said that girls at
nomically unfeasible because of the extra facilities it would re quire. Finally, he announced that there is a feminist plot to infil trate W.P.I. He said that women, on the road to world domination, are storming one of man’s last strongholds: Tech. H e called up on all Tech men to be aware of this conspiracy, for even the Boyn ton secretaries may be secret agents for the feminist movement. Prof. Richard Greene, who pre sided over the debate, declared the opposition the winner. T h e debaters wish it to be made clear that the views they defended in the debate are not necessarily those they actually hold.
Tak's •BARBER SHOP*
THEO'S CHAR-STEAK HOUSE
113 B HIGHLAND ST. Mon. Thur. Fri. 8:00-6:30 Sat. 8:00-6:00
BREAKFAST-LUNCH DINNER
151 HIGHLAND STREET