Corporal Punishment In School Essay

Essay on Corporal Punishment in Schools

Corporal Punishment

Beat the students! Beat the students! Beat the students! The way most school systems want to discipline their students in the school system, is to beat them. This is the concept most schools look at corporal punishment. Corporal punishment has been used in school for centuries. Many schools have limited the use of corporal punishment but most schools continue to use corporal punishment. Corporal punishment is defined as "physical pain inflicted on the body of a child as a penalty for disapproved behavior." These physical pains schools allow to use on students have become a problem. These problems consist of physical injuries and lawsuits. Over half of the states in the United States have banned corporal punishment,...show more content...

The teacher asks John to step into the hall to receive the corporal punishment which is to be paddled three times. John takes the paddling and return to the classroom. The students in the classroom began to laugh at John and John becomes discourage and will not enjoy the learning environment of the classroom. If John does not learn, he will continue to misbehave and think of himself unworthy. Corporal punishment has been a negative form of discipline in recent years.

Hicks–Pass suggests that the majority of the states that have corporal punishment in their schools are the states in the South, the Bible belt. The Bible belt believes the scripture Proverbs 13:24, whoever spares the rod hates their children, but the one who loves their children is careful to discipline them. The Bible belt believes in discipline the child through paddling, spanking, switches, or any other form they consider the 'rod' they could use to beat the child. To link corporal punishment to religious practices is not good if schools cannot link prayer back to schools and the reading of the National Anthem and leave God out. This design is now full of laws and constitutional rights and also unequal to gender. (Hicks–Pass, 2009) Another design of corporal punishment is for it to equal and for all students of all races and gender to receive the same punishment. If corporal punishment is not an equal form of discipline, then it should not be allowed in the school system. When school Get

The Practice Of Corporal Punishment In Schools

For decades leading back to slavery, corporal punishment has been used as a form of discipline to correct misbehavior on the plantation. In today's society, it has been used by parents and even incorporated into our schools as a form of punishment. In Kenyan schools it is used as form of classroom management and to punish children for poor academic performance (Kenyan children suffer frequent beatings by teachers, 1999). Corporal punishment, according to the Committee on the Rights of the Child, is the use of physical force with the intention to cause some degree of pain or discomfort, however light. In schools, it mostly involves the use of the hand, a ruler or belt to strike a person across the back or hand. But it can also involve, for example, shaking, pinching or forcing students to stay in uncomfortable positions (Committee on the Rights of the Child, 2006).

The practice of corporal punishment in schools as a form of discipline is dated back to ancient times (Greven, 1992). In the early civilizations of Egypt and Babylonia, the practice of physical punishment is related to the severity of the curriculum and atmosphere of schools. Also, it is recorded in history books, that corporal punishment was used in schools in the Western Judeo–Christian cultures. This is because in the Christian culture, as still been referred to and practiced today, many still believed in the scripture according to Proverbs 13 verse 24 which states one should not spare the road and spoil the

Every effort is made to distribute our findings so that all of the public cannot ignore the wholesale infliction of pain and suffering onto our school children, and the role "paddling" schools play in teaching our children that physically aggressive and coercive resolutions of conflict are legitimate. Contributing to the problem of violence by making children feel rejected and isolated, corporal punishment is unsafe in and of itself, but its discriminate application may be co–incident with problems unique to racial and gender identity and esteem, as well as academic and social confidence and competence.

Through familiarity, or the result of apathy or biased reasoning, people apparently can become accustomed to disproportionality. Most of us seem to accept as legitimate the percentages of involvement in retributive punishment that would be, in the opinion of this author, the most astounding overrepresentations. These corporal punishment figures and their proportions are not secreted away, outside of public view. Yet they seem to lack sufficient general interest to sustain public concern over the issue. Through generations of exposure, it seems that we casually accept the presumption that any penalty imposed by our institutions must, therefore, fit an offense for which that penalty is just. This is the conclusion that we believe the fellow students who are exposed to paddlings draw: if one of society's representatives of authority is striking someone, then he or she Get

Should Corporal Punishment Be Banned? Essay

Seven countries–Sweden, Finland, Denmark, Norway, Austria, Italy and Cyprus– have laws making it illegal for parents to use physical punishment on their children. Corporal punishment in schools has been banned in all the countries in Europe, South and Central America, China and Japan. The United States has outlawed corporal punishment from our prisons as cruel and inhumane treatment, as well as wife–beating, once thought to be the right of a husband. Why don't we afford the same protection to our children?

Our culture sanctions the use of corporal or physical punishment as a way for parents to discipline their children. Just a few weeks ago Marvin Munyon, president of the Family Resource Forum based in Madison, Wisconsin, was at the Eau Claire Gospel Center to talk about and demonstrate the proper way to spank children. Mr. Munyon would have us believe that discipline other thanspanking is ineffective (Emerson 1B, 3B). From my experience as a child and a parent I have found the opposite to be true. If we take a look at what discipline is and the reasons parents use physical punishment, we can then start to understand that there are more effective ways to discipline children.

Webster's New World Dictionary defines corporal punishment, as "bodily punishment." The word punish is defined by the same source as "to cause to undergo pain, loss, etc., as for a crime." There is no mention anywhere in this definition about teaching or training which is one of the definitions of Get more content

The Use Of Corporal Punishment In Schools

All across the US corporal punishment is being given to students as a method of discipline. Corporal punishment is infliction of pain as a punishment for an offense. Corporal punishment is legal in 19 states in school and at home That means that the government is allowing students to suffer just so they can learn a lesson. Corporal punishment does not belong in schools because it can hurt students emotionally/mentally, it shows students discrimination, and can harm students physically. When a child is hit by a teacher, it can harm them emotionally short and long term. The use of corporal punishment in schools can make a child more aggressive, defiant, and oppositional (Dupper, CP in US Public Schools). By hitting a student, the teacher is thinking they are teaching them a lesson but really they are setting them up to be more defiant once more and be hit again. It is a vicious cycle that will never end until the student is damaged for the rest of their life. Teachers hit kids because they think it will help them out in the long run but really it can lead to a number of different things such as anxiety, hostility, depression, aggression against authorities, teachers, and property. In the teachers mind they are preventing this student from acting out again but really they can come back and destroy school property. Also, the teacher may believe that because they hit this student the student will become a better person but really it makes them so much worse. Lastly, corporal punishment can affect a student's self image and weaken their social skills (Rollins, Revisiting the Issue). When a student is hit, they think less of themselves because they believe that the reason they were hit is because they are lesser than everyone else. They also could stop making new friends and become socially awkward because they are afraid that everyone will not be their friend just because others were not nice. Teachers do not understand the consequences that a student must face when he or she is hit by them. Some people may say that they can go to therapy and get better but most likely the student will still have permanent emotional damage. Another reason corporal punishment does not belong in school is because it teaches

Get more content

Pros And Cons Of Corporal Punishment In Schools

The bell rings. Students walk to art class where they are told not to drop the rulers on the floor. One student accidentally drops the ruler, hoping the teacher will not notice, fearing he will be beaten. However, the teacher sees it and paddles the student five times. The student now has severe bruising on his bottom just for dropping a ruler. This is not how it should be. Thirty–nine states have banned corporal punishment because it is dangerous in schools and not a suitable punishment for students(Morin). Corporal Punishment should not be allowed in schools because it promotes violence, it creates an unsafe environment, and it has a lasting impact on kids. Corporal punishment should not be allowed in schools because it promotes violence. Many students have been beaten by their teachers for doing something negative in school, and have gotten the message that violence is a good thing. The American Academy of Pediatrics has stated some examples of this in the article "Should Corporal Punishment Be Used in K–12 Schools".They explained that "Children who experience corporal punishment are more likely to hit or use violence against people to get their way." (Procon.com) This example shows that schools that use corporal punishment, teach that it is ok to use violence to get what students want. Students who see or experience corporal punishment get the message that violence is necessary to get their way. In other words, when those kids are out in the real world, they can not

Get more content

Corporal punishment should be in schools because it makes sure kids have good behavior, it also teaches kids to be respectful, and makes sure kids are safe. Every school should have corporal punishment in schools because it teaches kids to have good behavior. In 2014, 94% of parents with kids from three to four years old reported they had smacked their kid. This shows if a kid is acting up or not being good give him a quick smack and it should change their perspective on the situation. Corporal punishment should be in schools because if a kid is being bad in class they will most likely not do it again. They would not be afraid of their teacher either because they are most likely not the one spanking them if they're bad. In many schools bad behavior could get people detention, Anastasia explained "In 19 states, that behavior could get you spanked". This is a better punishment because detention does nothing but just make people stay at school for longer, but if they get a spanking they might not want to get in trouble again. Most people think that kids need to be safe and nurtured but if they aren't getting in trouble than they will have all those things. It also helps the school have a good learning environment with no distractions during class. Finney says," Detentions are not big enough for some students". This shows how things can be sorted out better with a couple smacks and to make sure they have better behavior. Every school should have corporal punishment in schools because it teaches kids to be respectful. In the 2005–2006 school year many students were acting up in class or doing bad things, and it shows that year having the most reported swats ever. This shows many kids weren't being respectful to their peers and got in trouble for that, but if they would have gotten detention they wouldn't have cared. When another student gets a detention for being late or something multiple times they'll have a good laugh about it and carry on with life. They don't care as much but a quick smack and they won't be laughing about that and they would most likely learn their lesson. Jacobs explained "The principal questioned her and asked to see her purse. Inside was a pack of cigarettes, rolling paper, and Get more content

The Use of Corporal Punishment in Schools Essays

Abstract

Recently, as the value of education is increasing, corporal punishment became hot issue on the world because there is no any appropriate answer about" Should corporal punishment be for discipline?" According to a history of corporal punishment of Wikipedia, the practice was recorded as early as c 10th Century BC in MГshlГЄ Shlomoh. Even though corporal punishment is not correct way for discipline like people usually think, how the punishment has been used so far or why?

Introduction

On a student's cell phone, a teacher is caught hitting students with a thick stick. He continually hits everywhere from, the students' hips to the head, harshly without a hesitation. This video is posted to the public video sharing site called...show more content...

The effect of the corporal punishment

Some people believe that teachers' using physical punishment is the most effective way to educate students because they believe it brings a very quick response, which is actually true. Some may argue that corporal punishment helps straighten out children's bad behavior fast. However, when people are hit or feel some other sort of pain, they immediately stop the behavior because nobody likes the feeling of pain. It has immediate results. To make it clear, let me give you an example from Korea. When a young student starts smoking, teachers in Korea choose to give physical punishment to correct the student's bad behavior. Teachers want to put an end to it as soon as possible because making someone stop smoking is very difficult. For those reasons, they need strong discipline to force them to stop smoking as quickly as possible. The student could stop smoking if the teacher uses physical punishment. The teacher may punish the student periodically for a month or so, knowing that for that month the student would not smoke. This may be enough time for the student to stop the wrong habit. Though the immediate effects of physical punishment are useful, they may not be long lasting. Still, people never know what happened to that student later in life because of the punishment that he received. He may have started smoking later after Get

Corporal Punishment in Schools

Corporal punishment in schools??

Advocates of school corporal punishment argue that it provides an immediate response to indiscipline and that the student is quickly back in the classroom learning, rather than being suspended from school. Opponents believe that other disciplinary methods are equally or more effective. Some regard it as tantamount to violence or abuse.

In the United States and the United Kingdom, and generally in the English–speaking world, the use by schools of corporal punishment has historically been covered by the common law doctrine of in loco parentis, whereby a school has the same rights over a minor as its parent.

In most places nowadays where it is allowed, corporal punishment inpublic schools is governed by...show more content...

It is not democracy which enhances or hinders our growth. Rather it is the approach that we take for our growth with proper utilization of the democratic machinery which is the real propellant to our overall socio–economic growth. Democracy in good hands would definitely induce growth but in wrong hands may lead to restrictive growth.

DEMOCRATIC GOVERNANCE IN INDIA– NEW CHALLENGES

Jogamaya Sandhibigraha

Part– II

Roll No. 01

India's status as a shining jewel of democracy in the poor man's world, and the sheer size of its electorate which alone entitles it to the designation of the world's largest democracy, have earned the country an easy ride among skeptics in the past, despite misgivings about its blemishes. But critical voices have raised their heads in recent times which in turn gave an open challenge to the democratic governance in the country. Especially after the advent of new technologies the insignificant issues are much able to challenge the continual process of governance. Among these issues poverty ,unemployment, corruption ,different kinds of bandhs, dharanas, terrorism, web activism ,degradation of the environment can be cited as the major challenges that are enough to shatter the very structure of democratic governance in India.

Corruption – a social malady– hold its strong grip over the every human activities ranging from cradle to grave. A recent survey gave the fourth

For years Corporal Punishment in schools has been a highly debated topic all over the world that deeply divides opinions. Many studies have been made to determine if corporal punishment encourages good behavior among students to follow the rules set out by the school. However, research has disproved this form of punishment which is outdated, ineffective, not to mention inhuman. Corporal punishment is defined by the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) as "striking a child with an open hand on the buttocks or extremities with the intention of modifying behavior without causing physical harm." But in the case where a child of no less than let's say one hundred pounds is being "disciplined" by someone twice their size, how does that not inflict physical pain!? Usually in schools corporal punishment comes in a form of a wooden or fiberglass paddle; which can result in a great deal of physical bruising, abrasions, and muscle injuries. A two hundred plus pound male teacher delivering the punishment is absolutely unfair to the students and only makes abuse more likely. There are also discriminatory factors when it comes to corporal punishment in schools. Studies have shown that minorities are greatly affected by corporal punishment. According to the journal Children & Schools, "corporal punishment in schools is most prevalent among boys, low– income children, and African–American students." In Mississippi, Alabama, and Georgia which hold the highest rating of corporal punishment are also the three states that have the largest population of African–American students. And what about the students that have a disability such as ADHD, a chronic condition that makes it difficult for such a student to focus due to the hyperactivity and impulsive behavior of this disorder. According to a mother interviewed by Time Magazine, her autistic son was "physically punished repeatedly when he was seven years old, noted, "The teacher felt he was doing some stuff on purpose." I cannot imagine that these children would comprehend the physical force being brought upon by an administrator. What about the psychological crippling that this form of punishment has on these children? Evidence shows thatspanking is bad for kids. Elizabeth

Get more content

Corporal Punishment Essay

Using corporal punishment in schools is not benefiting our children. In fact, it may be hurting our children more than helping them, and teaching them the wrong way to deal with their problems. I feel that discipline starts at home, and should not be left for the schools to handle.

Corporal punishment may do more harm than good. It "has no positive effects that we know of" (Keeshan 67). It may stop the unruly behavior temporarily, but it does nottreat the underlying causes (Keeshan 67). "Unruly behavior is a cry for help" (Keeshan 67). These children do not want to act this way, but they have no choice. We don't know why these children act unruly. Maybe it's because they are hungry or physically or emotionally...show more content... This is true, so why should we spank our children when they are going to receive worse punishment for things they do when they are older? It seems that we are teaching kids that if they do wrong, they'll get nothing but a little swat and that's all. There has to be another way to teach kids that their behavior was not appropriate. How about sending kids to their rooms? That simulates going to jail. What does spanking simulate? When these children grow up and commit more serious crimes, they will expect the court to give them a slap on the wrist and let them off. It doesn't work that way and they will be surprised to learn this.

I feel that corporal punishment only hurts our children and teaches them violence. Parents should demand that they be the ones to decide how their child is punished and then perhaps the five hundred thousand children that are paddled at school could actually benefit from discipline.

Works Cited "End Legal Child Abuse; Stop School Paddling." USA Today. 1 Apr. 1994: 14A.

Keeshan, Bob. "Corporal Punishment in Schools Would Not Help Children." From Bob

Keeshan: "The Time is Now." The Humanist, November/December1988. Rpt.

Opposing Viewpoints: America's Children. Ed. Bruno Leone and David Bender. Get more content

Corporal punishment in schools should be abolished

Corporal punishment has been used in schools as a way of handling disciplinary problems. It refers to school rules which allow students to be punished using physical pain without causing injury. It is believed that using punitive method can promote students' obedience and reduce problematic behaviour. As a result, it can decrease the number of disciplinary cases and maintain order inside the classroom. Indirectly, it will help to build students' discipline. Thus, teachers can focus on teaching the students. However, I believe thatcorporal punishment will bring more harm than benefits. Therefore, the practice of corporal punishment in schools should be abolished.

The first reason why...show more content... This is because they will feel humiliated and their reputation among other students will be affected. Most of the students are still in the stage where their peers' perceptions influence them. They need to feel good about themselves. Other students will perceive those who being punished as problematic students and they will think twice when they want to approach these problematic students. The situation where they are often being neglected can affect their self–esteem and confidence. Some of the students will also feel insecure when they are in schools. They will develop anxiety symptoms because they are too afraid of being punished. The case of my neighbour's son is one fine example. He is too afraid of going to school as he has witnessed many of his friends being punished by their teacher. He is such a good boy and it is almost impossible to see him misbehave. However, witnessing his own friends being punished has given a great impact to him. When he is in school, he can't focus in his class because he's afraid of the teacher. This implies that young children can have some kind of 'traumatic effect' when they observed unpleasant stimulus being performed. These psychological effects will lead to low achievement among punished students as well as those who witnessed the punishment.

The worst thing that can happen to students is that such aversive punishment will increase students' aggressive behaviour. Using

Get more content

Corporal Punishment of Children When I was in middle school at St. Mary's Catholic School, in Ethiopia, I used to see our teachers using different techniques to punish my classmates. I remember an incident in middle school where a friend of mine was punished in a harmful way because he failed to answer a question. Although the use of corporalpunishment in schools is intended to change the behavior of the student, teachers should not be allowed to use this method to punish their students as it is not effective for the child's behavioral change, and it affects the student's behavior psychologically and physically.

To start with, allowing teachers to use the corporal punishment causes physical damage on the student and abuses the child right. It is obvious that most punishments somehow results in pain. When I was in middle school, our math teacher Ms. Helen used to order us to solve a question by writing on the blackboard to show the other students. One day my classmate, Daniel was asked to solve a problem on the board, but he didn't write a complete answer. Ms. Helen was so angry with him that she put her pen between his pointing and middle fingers and twisted it so tight. We were so terrified because we had never seen someone being punished like that before. Daniel couldn't move his fingers and was taken to the hospital to fix his broken fingers. Our math teacher was fired right away for the excessive use of force on

Get more content

The Case Against Corporal Punishment

As the crime rate in our country grows, teaching our children right from wrong is one of the most important tasks facing educators. At some point or another, this task will require some sort of disciplinary action. In years past, schools used corporal punishment to discipline children. Connie Paige reports that, "According to U.S. Department of Education statistics, more than 600,000students were struck by teachers in public schools in 1990." Studies show that in today's society,corporal punishment does more harm than good here in the United States.

Many states have recognized the problems associated with corporal punishment and have begun to phase it out of their system. Still, many states ...show more content...

Obviously this "taking sides" can lead to an unfair situation for the child. Another factor in the misuse of corporal punishment is that it is, or shall we say should be, a violation of the child's rights. According to Carol Kreck, most states have laws forbidding the hitting of animals, prisoners, soldiers, and mental patients. It is astonishing that our children don't share these same rights.

Secondly, corporal punishment teaches the wrong lesson. According to Dr. Gil Simon, a Sacramento pediatrician, "...spanking teaches children that violence solves problems and stimulates more bad behavior" (Perkins). Children who are spanked also learn that hitting is an acceptable form of expressing anger (Haynes, 65). One might wonder if this might be the root of the violence problem in our society. If it is not the root, it is definitely an underlying factor. In recognition of this, many national organizations oppose corporal punishment. According to Kreck, these include The American Academy of Pediatrics, The National Education Association, The National Parent–Teacher Association, The American Bar Association, The American Medical Association, The Easter Seals Society, The National Coalition to Abolish Corporal Punishment in Schools, as well as many unnamed others. Dr. Irwin Hyman, Director of The National Center for the Study of Corporal Punishment and

Corporal Punishment Corporal punishment has been a part of family life for thousands of years, taking its place in societies all over the globe. From wood switches to thick leather belts, all sorts of tools have been used to discipline naughty children. No one has ever really examined the question of whether or not this form of punishment is productive or counterproductive. In examining the situation of whether or not this form of punishment is warranted or even what one might consider proper, a sample situation must be examined. Let's say, for argument's sake that a little boy named Johnny just threw a temper tantrum and threw his bowl of Coco CrispiesГ“ all over the kitchen floor. Now there are two things his mother could do at...show more content...

Now if she had spanked him or taken harsh words with him, she would be the lesser for it. He would be left with no reason for why his action was wrong, and he would resent his mother and possibly end up with some emotional damage since his mother gave him no reasoning behind her actions. He would see his mother as an abusive parent, which would lead him to fear his mother for years to come, dissolving any possibility of them ever developing a normal mother–son relationship.

This is just one fictional example that probably takes form in some way or another in the homes of millions of families. It is more than a question of whether or not to hit a child; it is a question of whether or not it benefits the child. Harsh words and/or a physical punishment do not adequately correct a child and they also leave the child with unanswered questions as to why he was punished in that manner. Those who use this form of punishment try to justify it by saying that they had it used on them and they turned out "o.k." In response to this, only one out of three persons who smoke actually die from smoking. Does this mean that cigarettes are not harmful? No, cigarettes are harmful, it is just that not everyone who smokes actually dies from it. In the same way, not everyone who has encounters withcorporal punishment as a child, ends up getting hurt in some way or another. With so many advances in the field of childpsychology, one must wonder why corporal

Corporal Punishment in Schools

Corporal punishment is the deliberate infliction of pain as retribution for an offence, or for the purpose of disciplining or reforming a wrongdoer, or to deter attitudes or behaviour deemed unacceptable (Miller, Vandome, & McBrewster, 2009). Corporal punishment can be divided into three categories, these include: judicial, domestic and school. For the purpose of this essay we will be focusing on school corporal punishment, the advantages and guidelines to follow when using corporal punishment and the disadvantages and effects on children when child abuse is used in the name of corporal punishment.

According to Vockell (1991), "Corporal punishment is the infliction of physicalpain, contingent upon the...show more content... Punishment must be administered soon after the offence. Children tend to forget the reason why they are being punished after a long period of time has passed, making them believe that they should not be punished. It is also best to specify the behavior being punished. Educators must administer corporal punishment dispassionately. Teachers tend to spank or hit a child more aggressively because they might not like the child as a person. Not to mention, teachers should be bother when they are administering corporal punishment to any child. Administer corporal punishment in front of appropriate witnesses, these witnesses should be regarded as reliable and truthful in case of litigation. And, corporal punishment should be carried out with appropriate confidentiality, because, what good would it do to humiliate the child. And finally, make sure you follow all the rules and regulations prescribed by the school system, this is to assure you have the support and an effective defense, should a legal challenge arise. But with every advantage there is an equal disadvantage. Most people believe that corporal punishment in schools is not morally acceptance. This is where the disadvantages occur. According to Vockell (1991), "punishment is not likely to be logically related to the misbehavior" (p. 279). This just means that the students who are punished for misbehavior not worthy of punishment are victims of artificial punishment. Artificial Get more content

Should Corporal Punishment Be Used In Schools?

Corporal punishment is a form of punishment used on children to correct bad behavior. The definition of corporal punishment is, a physical punishment , as flogging, inflicted on the body of one convicted of a crime (Dictionary.com). While several states strictly prohibit corporal punishment in schools, 44% of states in the U.S. still allow it to occur.Corporal punishment is an inappropriate way to correct bad behavior. However, almost 50% of the states in the U.S. still allow it to occur. Corporal punishment is always wrong to use in schools because it causes long–term negative effects on students, negative opinions of school or teachers, and it can increase the rate of crime and violence from students.

Corporal punishment is wrong because it causes long–term negative effects on students. If a student receives a paddling as a punishment it could cause serious problems for that student mentally and physically. One example of this is in an article called Should Corporal Punishment Be Used in K–12 Schools?. It says "frequent use of corporal punishment leads to a higher risk for anxiety, depression, substance abuse, stress, and other mental health". These would be dangerous for a child's health. In serious cases this could even lead to suicidal thoughts. Not only can corporal punishment affect a child's mental health, it can also have an affect on their performance in school. Another example from an article says, "Students who experience corporal punishment in

If you saw a teacher hitting their student, would you think it was okay or would you disagree? Corporal punishment of any child in school should be illegal in all states. Corporal punishment in school is causing the student pain in response to undesired behavior. It might involve hitting the student across the buttocks or the hand with a cane, wooden paddle, slipper, belt, or wooden yardstick (ruler). With corporal punishment you are not promoting a safe school, you can't sue the teacher who hit your child if the child gets hurt badly, and your also promoting violence into the vulnerable child's life; you're making a criminal. But, some might care to see that corporal punishment is okay and we can have it.

For instance, when you go to school their motto might be, "We have a safe school"; Jefferson's motto is "Safe, respectful, and responsible."According to http://www.debate.org/, if there are teachers corporeally punishing the student as a form of discipline, the child will never feel safe in that school. Students are supposed to go to their teachers for help but if their teacher is beating them the student will never ask for help and they will struggle in class, possibly causing grades to go down. Some schools also have a moto that includes being healthy. If the child was hit hard enough to the point where...show more content...

We all don't want to promote a dangerous school, children getting hurt with no charge of the person who did it, and we don't want to promote violence into one's life. We want to be known as the country that keeps our children safe, but if we are punishing them just for their behavior, we will no longer be keeping them safe. Lets give The United States of America a good reputation and discipline students in other ways. We will make every fifty two states have corporal punishment illegal in

Get more content

Corporal Punishment Essay

Corporal punishment is a very controversial topic that is being discussed amongst educators across the nation. Corporal punishment refers to any physical form of punishment, but in this case it refers to in schools. Currently there are many different terms used to label corporal punishment, for example, it has been called spanking, paddling, caning, lashing, popping, smacking, whipping or beating. Each term carries its own different meaning, but they all represents some form of corporal punishment.

Corporal punishment involves the deliberate infliction of pain upon a child, by an adult, as a result of the child's misbehavior or perceived misbehavior. It has been proven scientifically that the effects of it can be detrimental to the...show more content...

The pattern also covers Texas, Arkansas, Oklahoma, and Arizona. It extends from the Rocky Mountains to the Appalachian Mountains, so you can not say it only goes on in the south. But the South is the only region which is dominated by states that permit corporal punishment. Currently Arkansas is ranked as the worst state in reference to corporal punishment. In Arkansas, one out of every eight students is physically abused by their teachers, compared to the national average of one out of every 28 students. In Florida it was found that black students are twice as likely to be beaten then white students. Students in private schools are more likely to be beaten than public schools, while teachers in so–called Christian or Catholic schools hand out the most and the worst beatings.

Many, studies have shown that corporal punishment cause serious physical and psychological harm to large numbers of children. Each year in the U.S. thousands of children require medical treatment as a result of corpora punishment administered in schools. According to National Coalition to Abolish Corporal Punishment in Schools, school–inflicted corporal punishment has even caused the deaths of seven childrenВ including a kindergarten girl. Among the emotional problems that can result from corporal punishment are depression, withdrawal, sleep disturbances, avoidance of school, learning problems, loss of

Corporal Punishment in Schools

I wrote this paper for Contemporary Moral Issues class. This was an assignment of our choice and I chose to do this topic, because the week before in Intro to Education we had discussed discipline methods and I was astonished to learn that corporal punishment still existed in schools. I am hoping that by including this piece of work on my webfolio others will become aware that corporal punishment is alive and used often in our schools.

In the following paper I will discuss the controversial issue of the use of corporal punishment in schools. Supporters for corporal punishment say that it is a deterrent to misbehavior and delinquency, is needed to maintain discipline, and is not a...show more content... Corporal punishment that is administered by an educator is not a form of abuse; however, if someone other than an educator inflicted the same bruises or injuries it would obviously be abuse. Regardless of where the child is, they never deserve to be punished in such a way, because even the smallest amount of corporal punishment may lead to ever–lasting negative effects on the child. It should not matter who inflicted the bruises or injuries, because if it could clearly qualify as abuse then it is abuse, which then supports the argument that corporal punishment is a form of abuse.

The next key argument that I will present against corporal punishment in schools is that it is not administered properly. Corporal punishment is often administered by several objects and certain students are targeted. The schools are not being consistent with the instruments that are being used, because in addition to schools using the traditional wooden paddle, a variety of other instruments have been used. These include leather straps, switches, baseball bats, size 13 cowboy boots, canes, yardsticks, belts, hands, feet, and many other objects. The adult usually hits various parts of the child's body with the above Get more