Caisson: Studio 20, The Shape of Wine

Page 1

CAISSON Studio 20: The Shape of Wine Xavier Barnett 1341028 Design Studio C ^ Experiential View (Hao Yan)

Table of Contents

Act

Act

Act

Iterations 84

Section Iterations 89

90

Pneumatic Airform 90

Earth 92

Curtain Wall Diagrid System 94

Workflow 96

Element Analysis 98

100

102

Site

104

105

106

107

2 Caisson Table of Contents 2 Foreward 3
I: Introduction and Case Study Part 1: Precedents 4 Elastic Gridshell Exploration 6 Part 2: Form Exploration with Paper 6 Part 3: Chicken Wire Mesh Exploration 10 Part 4: Form-Finding and Analysis 12 Part 5: Final Physical Model 14 Pneumatic Shell Exploration 16 Finite Element Analysis 20 Case Study: Fiera Milano 22 Initial Digital Model 26 Final Digital Model 28 Physical Model Creation 30 Fiera Milano: Final Model 32 Act II: Design Development 36 Precedent Study 38 Site Visit 44 Site Analysis 46 Sketch Design Concepts 47 Spacial Analysis 50 Initial Plans 52 Revised Plans 55 Draped Roof Exploration 57 Final Concept Design 62
III: Span and Space 72 Plan Iterations 74 Section
Final
Detailed Design
Rammed
Steel
Digital
Finite
IV: Final Design Proposal
Digital Workflow
Final
Plan
Ground Level Plan
First Level Plan
Second Level Plan
Final Sections 108 Detail Drawings 112 1:25 Model 116 1:100 Model 118 Final Renders 120 Glossary of Terms 126 Bibliography 127

Foreward

Caisson. The term in Architecture refers to a chamber, atrium or box, and in the field of engineering refers to an underground structure that withholds water, mud, and landscape from an internal space. This term embodies the notion of Studio 20.

Studio 20 has been an incredible opportunity at the Melbourne School of Design. The studio brief was to design a winery, using techniques and ideas explored during the first four weeks of the studio, as will be explored through the gridshell and case study exercises. These exercises explored various “form resistant structures”, whether that be a timber gridshell, reinforced concrete pneumatic shell or steel and glass shell.

Through the case study, Hao Yan and myself explored Fiera di Milano, a steel and glass shell structure over an exhibition centre. This precedent was a key inspiration for the initial concept development of our winery, however this changed with a strong concept, another key factor of the studio.

Eventually, our design evolved into a structure more incorporating the landscape and creating an experience within. Our conept was to create an immersive journey within the landscape, guided by lights and shadows, creating a sense of exploration through open and enclosed spaces.

The final design embodied this concept. Having a strong concept was paramount to a successful design, guiding the remainder of the semester allowing us to create a design we were proud to call our own. Enjoy your stay.

- Xavier Barnett Caisson 3

Elastic Gridshell Exploration

Part 1: Precedents

There are a number of takeaways from the precedent study conducted in order to understand how an elastic gridshell can be successful. A key aspect is trhe bracing, with clear bracing always around the entrance. This allows for a clear entrance and minimising outward forces from the gridshell. Furthermore, the structure itself shall be braced at continuous centres through the form.

There must also be points of anchorage on the ground, transferring the load and minimising outward forces. Many precedents use concrete anchor points where the form makes connection to the ground, withholding the elastic potential energy in the shell. The bracing itself is generally twice the with of the conventional gridshell spacing, through the centre of each diagrid panel.

The gridshell may include voids, however these must be braced similarly to any entrances on the form.

> Japan Pavillion by Shigeru Ban Architects Image: Shigeru Ban > > Further precedents outlined on page 5 4 Caisson

The following precedents are examples of elastic gridshell architecture, being the Japan Pavillion by Shigeru Ban Architects, the Mannheim Multihalle by Frei Otto and Acts on Tracts by the Institute of Advanced Architecture in Catalonia, Spain. Acts on tracts is noted for its unique bracing system attached to anchor points, which will be benificial for the final design.

Mannheim Multihalle, Frei Otto Image: Daniel Lukac Acts on Tracks, Institute of Advanced Architecture Japan Pavillion, Shigeru Ban Image: Roland Halbe
Caisson 5

Elastic Gridshell Exploration

2: Form Exploration with Paper

The next step was to use physical form finding with paper to create a gridshell form that could be developed into more realised ideas through mesh and digitisation. The assigned form of a cafe was explored through various abstracted forms, such as a croissant, espresso machine and latte art.

While this approach may be seen as cute or superficial, it was incredibly benificial as a starting point to creating an ideal form.

The abstracted espresso drip created two voids that allowed for unconventional folding points in the form. Along with this, the voids allowed for interesting light play when folded with double curvature.

> Iterations from paper > > Progression diagram from abstraction to form > First spacial iteration from paper cutout > Second spacial iteration from paper cutout > Third spacial iteration from paper cutout > Final spacial iteration from paper cutout
Part
6 Caisson

Mindmap

The process of the espresso machine form began with researching images of drip. this was then sketched onto paper, with this form then segmented and cut out, with the decision to use the negative space of the espresso drip rather than the espresso drip itself, creating the two voids outlined previously. This cut out form with grid paper allowed for increased light play and curvature.

Espresso Drip Sketch Negative Space Cut-out Spacial Form Caisson 7

Elastic Gridshell Exploration

2: Form

with

exploration with paper resulted in four different forms, all creating unique space with unique light.

top of the

outlined on page 4, I was inspired by Melbournes laneways, that use an enclosed space to have a lively and vibrant cafe space. The brief required the gridshell to have a point of contact to a wall, with all of the iterations having connection to two walls rather than one.

result of this was spaces that resulted in less comfortable circulation and perhaps an over-enclosed space. As this design progressed, we would see spaces that only connected to a single wall that had free-flowing circulation through the space.

> Spacial Abstractions for cafe interior > > “Hero shot” This
On
precedents
The
Part
Exploration
Paper > Cafe spacial development #1 > Cafe spacial development #2 > Cafe spacial development #3 > Cafe spacial development #4 8 Caisson
> Cafe spacial development #5
Caisson 9

Elastic Gridshell Exploration

3: Chicken Wire Mesh Exploration

The design then went though further refinement and realisation through chicken wire, simulating the mesh form of an elastic gridshell. After various initial failed attempts with the original form, the shape had to be adapted to remove aspects of the void. This was due to over bending from the wire that disallowed both sinclastic and anticlastic curvature, with the form collapsing upon trying to achieve this. As a result, only the droplets from the initial form had been retained, however this was the key aspect of the void light play that I had intended to include.

> Development images of chicken wire mesh exploration
Part
> Chicken wire form plan > Chicken wire front elevation > Chicken wire side elevation 10 Caisson

In order to come to a final form, the most successful aspects of each group member’s design was implimented into one final form. The voids from my form, the bending moments from Christopher’s form and the segments of Afrah’s form were combined into one final gridshell, as seen below.

Elastic Gridshell Exploration Part 3: Chicken Wire Mesh Exploration Abstraction from espresso drip Abstraction from Croissant Abstraction from Latte art > Images extracted from inital cafe abstractions \/ Final mesh model Caisson 11

Elastic Gridshell Exploration

Part 4: Form-Finding and Analysis

The next step was digital gridshell form-finding through a program called Grasshopper, a visual scripting software for CAD, allowing for parametric modelling. Through a plug-in for Grasshopper called Kangaroo, gridshell forms can be simulated from base shapes, calculating the height and bending moments of a physical elastic gridshell.

The selected forms for this stage were a continuation of the forms created from the initial espresso form. The edges became more rigid, and the shape became more angular, allowing for better connections to the surface. Some iterations still used the void form, with this being my preffered iteration from this step.

> “Hero shot” of gridshell generated from Kangaroo form finding > > Various design iterations from form finding 12 Caisson
Iteration 1 Plan View Iteration 2 Plan View Iteration 3 Plan View Iteration 4 Plan View Iteration 1 Elevation View Iteration 2 Elevation View Iteration 3 Elevation View Iteration 4 Elevation View Caisson 13

Elastic Gridshell Exploration

Part 5: Final Physical Model

The final design was a result of further realisation and adaption of the previous models. The model itself was created in a “T” shape, a result of cutting and changing the previous forms. It still retains similarities to previous designs such as the previous kangaroo models with the overall layout, however accessibility of the cafe had to be considered as well as connection points.

A key aspect taken from the precedents was the edge beams along the connection points of the gridshell. These serve as seating for the cafe as well as structural supports for the gridshell, as well as edge bracing providing further support.

> Perspective hero shot of final elastic gridshell model > > Development images of elastic gridshell fabrication
14 Caisson
Formation of Gridshell with cable ties
Plan
view Side elevation view Front elevation view
Final form Caisson 15

Pneumatic Shell Exploration

Part 1: Form Finding

The next step in the design journey was exploring Pneumatic shells. Pneumatic form finding is a method of using compressed air through a membrane to create form, creating space from the path travelled by the air.

My assigned brief was a “stage” design, with various considerations nessesary for this to be successful. I intended on having two different spaces within my stage, a backstage area, seating, and the stage itself being the bridging point between these spaces. Both of my base forms engaged with this, forming two “bow-tie” spaces with the stage being the pinching point. These forms, as seen on page 17, were laser cut on MDF and then formed with the Vacuum Forming machine to inflate plastic through the cutout form.

The resulting forms successfully fit the brief of a stage, however then had to be analysed in order to understand the realism of such a form.

> Form creation with Vacuum Forming machine > > Development of Pneumatic form
16 Caisson
Laser-cut
cutout of form
Inflated
plan view
Inflated
plan view
Side Elevation Side ElevationLaser-cut
cutout
of form Caisson 17
> External view of iteration #1 > > External view of iteration #! > > > External view of elevation #3
Section of pneumatic
form iteration #1
Section
of
pneumatic
form iteration #2 18 Caisson
Caisson 19

Pneumatic Shell Exploration

The Pneumatic Shell stage form created then had to be digitally analysed in a grasshopper plugin called Karamba. The plug in measures the structural performance of a form by having a number of inputs, being material, material cross section height (thickness) and input surface, among other commands. The result is a displacement scale, that identifies where the form is weak, identifying how far the material is displaced by a force, in this instance being gravity. Maximum Displacement: 0.16318 (1.63cm) Material: Concrete C30/37 Material Thickness: 20cm Height: 4.95mm
Part 3: Finite Element (FEM) Analysis 0.0e+00 1.7e -3 3.40e- 3 5.10e- 3 6.5e -3 8.5e -03 1.02e- 02 1.19e- 02 1.36e- 02 1.7e -02 Karamba Model - First Iteration 20 Caisson

of

must either be

Both forms are relatively successful with low displacement results, however it is clear where the form is strained the most. The points where multiple triangular subdivisions meet tend to be under a lot of stress, and these are found at the apex
any curve on the form. These
braced or avoided. Maximum Displacement: 0.011774m (1.1cm) Material: Concrete C30/37 Material Thickness: 20cm Height: 4.4m 0.0e+00 1.18e- 03 2.36e- 03 3.54e- 03 4.72e- 03 5.9e -03 7.08e- 03 8.26e- 03 9.44 e- 02 1.18e- 02 Karamba Model - Second Iteration Caisson 21

>

Case Study: Fiera Milano

Part 1: Precedent Journal

Fiera Milano is an unconventional grid shell situated in Milan, Italy. It is a perfect case study for the exploration of gridshell structures due to the approach of several different construction methods to realise the design. The gridshell is consists of a raised peak (Logo) and several full and half valleys, referred to as volcanos and half volcanos, connected through flat quadrangular meshes that span approximately 1300 meters.

The construction of the flat portions of Fiera Milano are constructed from 240mm steel bars, connected through four-pronged nodes, resulting in a quadrangular grid. These nodes are supported by “tree columns” at intervals of 16.2 meters longitudinally and 13.5 meters transversally. The tree nodes expand out to 4 outward branches, supporting 4 nodes.

Photograph of Fiera Milano Full volcano Fiera Milano Full Volcano
22 Caisson

Selected portion of Fiera Milano segmented for modelling, Schlaich et al, 2005.

Plan view of Fiera Milano Triangular subdivisions, Schlaich et al, 2005. Fiera Milano Full Volcano Image Credit: Studio Fuksas Fiera Milano Half Volcano Image Credit: Studio Fuksas
Caisson 23

The half volcanos are constructed alternatively to allow for the unconventional angles required to realise the concept. The design is far too warped to be able to support quad mesh, so the mesh becomes triangulated. The result of this is the addition of members that run diagonal to the quadrangular meshes longitudinally. In addition to this, transverse diagonal members are added to each quad mesh, making connection to the ground.

The full volcanoes become increasingly complicated, with the addition of spiralling bars. The result of this extra member is the forced introduction of a 5-pronged node, creating pentagonal mesh at these intersections in order to allow for seamless mesh. Bars arranged in a radial pattern subdivide and triangulate this mesh for fluidity.

Pentagonal Mesh

Longitudonal members, diagonal to quadrangular mesh Schlaich et al, 2005. Addition of transverse members Schlaich et al, 2005. Final Form, Schlaich et al, 2005. Full volcano pentagons due to mesh alteration 24 Caisson

Case Study: Fiera Milano

Part 2: Initial Digital Model -

The initial model was created on Rhinoceros 7, a digital design software. The form was designed using a method called SubD, which subdivides forms and averages the curvature between subdivisions, allowing for smooth and pliable curvature in a form.

This approach was then referenced into Grasshopper, which created the members specified in the research stage, including the increased subdivisions within the volcano and half volcano forms. This however proved incredibly difficult to achive inside the volcanoes themselves, due to projection problems in the form.

The result of this was subdivisions that were far too long, with real life subdivisions in the Fiera Milano never exceeding 3 metres. Many of these subdivisions were upwards of 5 meters.

<< Initial
Render (Hao Yan)
Caisson 25

Part 2: Initial Digital Model

The initial model was created on CAD Porgram Rhinoceros 7, created through SubD, allowing for forms to fluidly be transformed through subdivisions. We were new to this tool, resulting in geometry in the volcanos and half volcanos that did not follow the plan outlined in the reference document. The rest of the form, being the vela-roof and the platforms between were generated well from SubD, with touchups in grasshopper to formulate the bars and the panels within the roof. The International Journal of Space Structures was paramount to recreating this design, with Schlaich Schober’s writings indicating how intricate aspects of the Fiera Milano were constructed. The curvature of the volcano was quite unique, resulting in difficult to replicate triangulation.

Manually constructed rhino subD Recreated surface with diagonal grid Curve that marks out the area with bracing Surface with designed bracing area Cylindrical Joints Manually modeled columns Mesh for glass panels Final model Steel frames Surface of simple diagonal steel frame Surface of simple steel frames with bracing Weaverbird midedge subdivision Dispatch using points in curve relationship (Through reconstruction) Get edge curves Vertices based cylinder Pipe Bake
Initial Half Volcano Form (Hao Yan)
Progression (Hao Yan) 26 Caisson
Failed Karamba Analysis befor additional support points were added Improved Karamba Analysis Caisson 27

Case Study: Fiera Milano

3: Final Digital Model

After the inital analysis and feedback session, it was clear that the geometry of the volcano and half volcano had to be increasingly realistic, especially going forward into fabrication.

After days of deliberation, it was found that the method of creating the half volcano outlined in the Schlaich and Schober’s file was not the most efficient method of finding the curve geometry. Rather, the only way to make it work was to add the subdivisions directly in Rhinoceros, creating more geometry subdivisions, rather then extending the default amount of subdivisions in the half volcano. This was also efficient in the full fulcano, The document states that the helix form is key, thus by adding a helix subdivision on the SubD, the geometry properly generated.

While some subdivisions generated horizontally rather than vertically, these could be swapped and the geometry could properly form.

Part
Initial form after increasing subdivisions, creating longitudonal members Form after addition of transverse members in grasshopper Cleaned up geometry, final half volcano form Final full volcano form after cleaning up geometry 28 Caisson
Final Elevation with fixed volcano geometry, 1:500 Final Plan with fixed volcano geometry, 1:500 N Caisson 29

Case Study: Fiera Milano

Part 5: Physical Model Creation

The final physical model of the Fiera Milano was created from a combination of 1mm mountboard, along with 3D printed sections. The inital step was to segment the sections that would be laser cut, and segment the sections that were to be 3D printed.

The next step was to run a script that measured the intersections between the diagonal curves in the digital model, which then generated notches in the linework for laser cut fabrication.

Spaces that were not laser cut were sent to the 3D printers, which were the full volcano, half volcano and the trees that were to hold the structure up.

> Hero shot of physical model
30 Caisson

Case Study: Fiera Milano

Part 5: Physical Model Creation

The strips were then sent to the laser cutters in order to be assembled. The X and Y axis of strips were separated out and placed in their nessesary order, however this came with great difficulty to complete successfully.

Eventually, the laser cut sections of the Vela Roof were assembled, with diagonal bracing being required to reduce bending in the members. The bracing profiles had to be separately fabricated, and placed alongside the voids for the 3D printed volcanos. The notches were created through parametrically calculating the intersection of bars, creating notches depending on the thickness of material

Rhino Model Laser-cut
strips
3D
Printing of volcano structures
Laser
cut construction
Transverse
bracing
Caisson 31

Fiera Milano: Final Model

Finally, the model was braced externally, supporting the form from both lateral and transverse forces. By gluing each intersection between the bracing and the vela-roof, each strip was glued to the edge beam (bracing) thus supported. The form was then spray painted white for consistency, then finally, the 3D printed half volcano and full volcano could be inserted into the structure.

Lateral bracing Spray painting Assembly Completion 32 Caisson
Side elevation of final Fiera Milano model Caisson 33
Final form of 3D printed full volcano Final form of 3D printed half volcano 34 Caisson
Plan view of Fiera Milano Model Elevation view of Fiera Milano model
Caisson 35

Act II: Design Development

36 Caisson

The next step was to begin our own winery design. Naturally, the first step was to review precedents of wineries that have qualities that we aimed to embody in our own design. These features were largely incorporation into the landscape, responsible vitaculture and land use and unconventional forms. Many old-world wineries tend to be rather conservative in their wineries, however these precedents reject that notion. We aspired to be bold in our designs like these unconventional old-world wineries.

Based on a site visit, basic sketch designs and spacial massing were created, with a series of conceptual digital models and plans created from this exploration and precedent study.

Caisson 37

Precedent Study

Chateau Cheval Blanc

Christian De Portzamparc Bordeaux, France

Grape Varietals grown:

Cabernet Franc

Merlot

Cabernet Sauvingon

Malbec

A number of precedents were studied to identify successful aspects of wineries. One of the key aspects of the brief was to incorporate a form-resistant structure, like the gridshells explored in previous weeks. While not all precedents directly engage with this idea, the Chateu Cheval Blanc in the Bordeaux reigion perfectly encapsulates this idea, with a sweeping roof creating an excellent relationship between the form and the ground.

>
Southern view of Chateau Chevin Blanc, Erik Saillet, Max Botton
38 Caisson
^
Northern view of Chateau Chevin Blanc, Erik Saillet, Max Botton ^ Eastern view of Chateau Chevin Blanc, Erik Saillet, Max Botton
Caisson 39

Precedent Study

Shilda Winery X-Architecture Studio Kakheti, Georgia

Grape Varietals grown: 20+

The Shilda Winery by X-Architecture Studio encapsulates how a shell can be extruded from the ground. The curvature of the form allows for light to penetrate through the southern face of the building, opening up to a space that still respects internal layout.

> Perspective Render, @Michael_Archviz 40 Caisson
^
Perspective Render, @Michael_Archviz
^
Elevation Render, @Michael_Archviz
Caisson 41

Precedent Study

Antinori Del Chianti Classico

Marco Casamonti, Archea Associati Chianti, Italy

Grape Varietals grown: Sangiovese Cabernet Franc Cabernet Sauvingon

The Antinori Del Chianti Classico, in the Chianti wine region (Chianti Classico, to be exact), is particularly noteworthy for the relationship with the ground plane. Situated on a hill like the Denton Site, the way the winery has a symbiotic relationship with the hill, as seen on the images capsured by Pietro Savorelli and Leonardo Finotti. Furthermore, the site plays with light in a phemonological manner, which increases user experience within the site.

> Perspective of Antinori Winery, Pietro Savorelli, Leonardo Finotti
42 Caisson
^ Internal Experiential Image, Pietro Savorelli, Leonardo Finotti ^ Southern Elevation, Pietro Savorelli, Leonardo Finotti
Caisson 43

Denton Hill Winery

Part 1: Site Visit

The visit to site on the 29th of August presented a number of opportunities and challenges to approach while on site. An initial observation was the visibility of the Denton house on the site, meaning the design would have to both incorporate the view of the Denton house while still respecting the internal privacy of the house. Another observation was the incredible slope on site. It would become crucial to use this slope to an advantage and incorporate the design into the slope, while not infringing on the vines already planted on the slope.

> Northern entrance to the Denton site
44 Caisson
^ North-Eastern corner of site ^ North-Western corner of site Caisson 45

Denton Hill Winery

2: Site Analysis

Part
Site Boundaries Greenery and Shrubbery Pre-Existing Vines Water Access Contours at 1m intervals Denton House Selected Site Road Access 46 Caisson

Denton Hill Winery

Part 3: Sketch Design Concepts

The next challenge was to come up with initial ideas of form through sketching. Through the precedent study, certain aspects of each precedent were identified. These qualities were then sketched, in an effort to find a final form that embodied the best qualities of all three selected precedents. The key quality from all precedents to follow was an interaction with the ground plane, with all of the forms cutting into the side of the Denton Hill.

Form incorporating aspects of Chateu Cheval Blanc

Form incorporating aspects of Antinori Del Chianti Classico

Form incorporating aspects of Shilda Winery

Caisson 47

Denton Hill Winery

3: Sketch Design Concepts

Part
^
Sketch on North-Eastern Corner of
site 48 Caisson
^ Sketch on North Eastern Corner of site ^ Sketch
on North-Western corner
of site Caisson 49

Design Development

Based on the brief, the next step was to analyse the size of

for the

The required

were a wine production facility, as well as a cellar for storage purposes, making up the production aspect of the program. The hospitality aspect of the program consisted of a cellar door for tasting and small meals, along with a resturant for larger meals. Additionally, the program consists of four suites.

spaces needed
winery.
spaces
Part 1: Spacial Analysis Vintage/ Production Communal and Reception Resturant Suites 450m2 240m2 240m2 4x24m2 Initial form after spacial analysis Bridging gaps for a circular space Retrofit of spacial analysis spaces into circular formulation Vintage/ Production Communal and Reception Resturant Cellar Door Suites 450m2 240m2 240m2 136m2 4x24m2 50 Caisson
Vintage/ Production Communal and Reception Resturant Cellar Door Suites 450m2 240m2 240m2 136m2 4x24m2 Second iteration of spaces, arranged longitudonally for sun exposure Bridging of spaces to allow for continuous flow Retrofit of spaces into form created above Final Spacial Analysis Caisson 51

Design Development

Part 2: Initial Plans

The initial plan created by the spacial analysis allowed for continuous flow through the site, however was all situated on a flat plane and didn’t incorporate the site well enough. Additionally, the suites and production spaces were too far removed from the form itself.

> Initial Site Plan with location of spacial analysis spaces
52 Caisson
> Initial axonometric plan view Caisson 53

Design Development

Part 2: Initial Plans

As seen in the below section, the cellar space was situated directly below the cellar door space, however this still seemed too cramped so the spaces were to increase in size. Furthermore, the space had to have more space to allow for additional programs such as bathrooms, kitchens and plant rooms.

> Initial axonometric section featuring cellar space

54 Caisson

Design Development

Part 3: Revised Plans

The revised plan adapted to the problems that arose from the initial plans. The new program allowed for bathrooms, being male, female and ambulant, as well as a larger, dedicated kitchen space. The production space, offset into the hill, featured a number of dedicated spaces for the program, as outlined in the plan. Circulation between the production space and the hospitality space was done primarily through the cellar, as a bridging between the two.

>

Initial Sub Divided gridshell roof.

Caisson 55
> Adapted axonometric plan view with improved spaces and circulation 56 Caisson

Design Development

Part 4: Draped Roof Exploration

The initial approach to fulfilling the brief of a form resistant structure was through a “draped” form, using SubD for Rhinoceros 7, a CAD software that subdivides a surface and calculates the curves between subdivisions. This approach was resemblant of the Fiera di Milano case study, adapted for this design.

While this form did include all of the brief under the same roof, it didn’t encourage the connectivity that was intended between spaces and potentially over-enclosed the space.

Axonometric Section of draped roof

Caisson 57
Entry view under draped roofView into suite spaces 58 Caisson
Hero Shot at eye-level Caisson 59

-

Plan

N <
view of adapted design with draped roof, 1:500
60 Caisson

Final Concept Design

Final Site Plan

Caisson 61

Final Concept Design

Part 1: Cellar Design

The final concept design stemmed from a further adaption of the program outlined above, with an addition of a gallery space on an upper level. The gallery, doubling as a mezzanine space encourages a more continuous circulation through the space, with a path not having a clear, designated end, rather drawing the individual through the space. Eventually, the user re-emerges in the cellar door space to continue circulation through the remainder of the space.

The Plan as seen on the following page represents the cellar space offset into the ground. The curved form in the cellar pays homage to traditional “barrell vault” cellar designs, while still maintaining a contemporary relationship with the above space. The cellar features Oak Barrells for Ageing, as well as stainless steel vats for un-oaked wines. Additionally, the space features a number of Cuvees for sparkling wine production.

>

Hero shot of cellar space

62 Caisson
> Plan view of Cellar Space, 1:500 Caisson 63

Final Concept Design

Part 2: Main Hospitality Centre Design

The adapted plan of the main hospitality centre maintains an open plan approach to the space. As seen on the following plan, the space encourages an elliptical circulation through the space through the use of the voids in the space. Furthermore, this circulation draws resturant patrons away from the private suite areas, with no natural conclusion to the space.

The main “Barrell Void” provides views into the cellar space underneath, while being a natural barrier between the cellar door and the restaurant. This draws people around and through the space as they get views into the cellar, as well as views out to the Yarra Valley.

Denton’s Production space is featured at the same elevation as the hospitality centre, however offset into the hill to the south of the space. The access between the two spaces is through the cellar, as a bridging space.

> Hero
shot of hospitality centre
64 Caisson

Plan view of Hospitality Centre and Production facility, 1:500

Caisson 65

Final Concept Design

Part 3: Upper Gallery/Museum Space

The Final Addition to the design is an upper gallery and museum space for exhibition use. As an open mezzanine space, it provides a dynamic relationship between the restaurant space and the cellar. This encourages circulation through all three spaces by people drawn to site for different reasons, having a direct visual connection. The space also provides framed views to the denton house through a glass skylight, drawing people through the space and engulfing them in the Yarra Valley.

> Hero shot of upper gallery and museum space 66 Caisson
> Plan view of gallery, 1:500 Caisson 67

Final Concept Design

Part 4: What comes next?

The next step is to incorporate more form-resistant structures into the form, creating a more immersive experience within the space. The goal is to have cleaner circulation between spaces on multiple levels, and have the spaces more complimentary to the surrounding environment.

While the space does incorporate form resistant structures through the pneumatic cellar and the bridging view glass spaces between the cellar and the remainder of the form, these can become clearer and more defined.

Section through cellar, hospitality and gallery spaces (Hao Yan)

68 Caisson
Caisson 69
70 Caisson
Caisson 71

Act III: Span and Space

72 Caisson

As the approach to design became increasingly realised and literal, more consideration to the design as inhabitable space had to be considered. A strong concept was developed, expanding our design ideas. Our concept centred around a journey through the landscape, guided by light and voids underneath the land. We aimed to create an immersive experience exploring open and enclosed spaces, evoking feelings of adventure and exploration. This concept was further explored through five developed plans and five developed sections, that best represented this concept and the experiences we wanted to evoke. A series of detail iterations were created to further realise the concept.

Caisson 73

Plan Iterations

Iteration #1

The approach of the initial plan iteration was to better encapsulate the idea of the cave. Our refined concept was “A journey of immersion and exploration through cave-like forms, creating feelings of being within the earth”. In the first iteration, this was encapsulated through following a series of voids and skylights through the space. The voids guide the user through light, drawing the user through the space as they follow the light.

> Initial concept sketch of the first iteration 74 Caisson
VOID VOID VOID VOID VOID VOID VOID VOID VOID Function Space/Cellar Door Cave Entrance1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Restaurant Suites Kitchen Female Bathroom Gender Neutral Bathroom Cellar 12 1 2 34 5 6 7 8 9 11 12 Foyer Skylight Cave Entrance to Decorative Cellar Male Bathroom 10 N Plan Iteration 1 (1:200) Caisson 75

Plan Iterations

Iteration #2

The next iteration built on the first by further encouraging feelings of exploration through the spaces. By making the circulation less linear, the user is encouraged to become immersed in the space and explore. The space experiments more with open versus enclosed spaces, immersing the user in the journey through caves that we wanted to achieve. The idea of the voids being a central guiding aspect is still paramount to the iteration. The iteration further experiments with heavy versus light massing, rather than homogenous wall thicknesses, creating a cavelike experience.

> Initial concept sketch of Iteration 2

76 Caisson
VOID VOID VOID VOID VOID VOID VOID VOID VOID Function Space/Cellar Door Cave Entrance1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Restaurant Suites Kitchen Female Bathroom Decorative Cellar 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Foyer Skylight Cave Entrance to Decorative Cellar Male Bathroom N Plan Iteration 2, 1:200 Caisson 77

Plan Iterations

Iteration #3

The third iteration improves further upon the second iteration by having a more circular flow. The aspects of immersion are still clear by having the user explore the space through the voids, however the spaces are slightly more separated and distinct, with each new space bringing a new immersed experience.

> Concept sketch of iteration 3
78 Caisson
Function Space/Cellar Door Cave Entrance1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 9 9 9 10 11 Restaurant Suites Kitchen Female Bathroom Gender Neutral Bathroom Decorative Cellar Skylight Cave Entrance to Decorative Cellar Male Bathroom N Plan Iteration 3, 1:200 Caisson 79

Plan Iterations

Iteration #4

Iteration 4 takes the idea of the cave through a new approach, further experimenting with enclosed and open space. By creating a “pinch” effect on the centre of the space, the users are squeezed through spaces, reflecting crevasses found in a cave. On the other side of the pinch is an open chamber with another void, drawing light into the space, with the voids again providing the key indication of the spaces to explore next.

> Concept sketch of iteration 4
80 Caisson
VOID VOID VOID VOID VOID VOID Function Space/Cellar Door Cave Entrance1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Restaurant Suites Kitchen Female Bathroom Gender Neutral Bathroom Cellar 12 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Foyer Skylight Cave Entrance to Decorative Cellar N Male Bathroom 1 2 3 4 5 Plan Iteration 4, 1:200 Caisson 81

Plan Iterations

Iteration #5

The final iteration was the plan that was chosen to become finalised. The iteration focusses on open vs enclosed space to create immersion, creating a series of cave chambers that are discovered through multiple pinches in the form. The circulation is far less linear than the other iterations, with the journey of exploration truly immersing the user in the space, having the freedom to choose the next space they want to discover.

> Initial concept sketch of Iteration
5
82 Caisson
VOID VOID VOID VOID VOID VOID VOID VOID VOID Function Space/Cellar Door Cave Entrance1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 6 6 6 7 8 9 9 Restaurant Suites Kitchen Cellar 1 2 2 3 3 4 5 Foyer Skylight Cave Entrance to Decorative Cellar N Plan Iteration 5, 1:200 Caisson 83

Section Iterations

Concurrently, sections were being developed following the same concept in order for the spaces in plan in section to reflect each other. The final selected section can be seen, which informed the following plans and sections.

>
Section Development Sketch (Hao Yan)
84 Caisson

Section Iterations

The final sections of the space were then created, from a conglomeration of Iteration 5, and a new digital model from Iteration 5 to infrom the new section. It was paramount to the design that not all spaces take place on a single level, with the journey through the site needing to be on the Z axis as well as X and Y, to truly immerse the user in the experience of the cave. The voids as a central guiding feature are still paramount in the sections, creating natural light in an otherwise dark space.

> Hao’s visual representation of different spaces in section (Hao Yan)
Caisson 85
5 1 2 2 11 12 13 4 4 6 6 78 9 10 5 3 3 3 1 Ground Floor Plan Foyer Cellar door Cellar door private rooms 4 Restaurant 5 6 7 Restrooms Private dining Indoor amphitheater 8 Kitchen 9 10 11 Stair to 1st floor 13 Production entrance Cellar Spiral staircase 12 Visitor entrance 150m Plan Iteration- Hao Yan Ground Floor 86 Caisson
1 11 1 2 3 2 3 Gallery Gallery (tunnel) Roof garden 4 4 Multi-purpose room 5 5 6 6 7 7 Production space Stair to ground floor Stair to second floor 8 8 Spiral staircase to ground floor 5 First Floor Plan 150m First Floor Caisson 87
5 Second Floor Plan 150m 1 1 1 1 1 Suites Upper Floor 88 Caisson

Final

89 ^ Final North Section Developed from Hao’s Iterations, 1:200 (Xavier Barnett) ^ Final East Section Developed from Hao’s Iterations, 1:200 (Xavier Barnett) ^ Final East Deep Cut Section Developed from Hao’s Iterations, 1:200 (Xavier Barnett)
Section Iterations (Xavier Barnett) Caisson 89

Detailed Design System 1: Pneumatic Airform

The initial iteration of a detailed design features a pneumatic airform structure. Prefabricated airforms are created from a composite tarpaulin, fabricated off site to the size of a desired gridshell. High pressure fans are installed on site, with the prefabricated airform being hooked into an in-situ concrete slab at nessesary intervals.

The high pressure fans inflate the airform, with an initial concrete layer being applied to the exterior of the airform. Reinforcements are then placed within the concrete, with a finishing layer of concrete then applied to the form. The airform is then removed, creating an interior space to be sprayed with Polyeuthane foam and an interior finish.

In this instance, with the addition of the void structures, extra reinforcements have been placed on the exterior with a retaining wall to support the void.

SKIRTING AND CABLE TRAY TATE RAISED FLOOR SYSTEM TATE PEDESTAL BASKET

AIRFORM ANCHOR BOLTED TO SLAB

REINFORCEMENTS BOLTED TO SLAB IN-SITU SLAB TO ENGINEER’S SPEC

RC AIRFORM SHELL GROUND CONNECTION DETAIL

SHOTCRETE, 20mm, FINISHING LAYER PREFABRICATED AIRFORM POLYEUTHANE FOAM REINFORCEMENT TO ENGINEER’S SPEC IN-SITU CONCRETE APPLIED TO FOAM DISPLACED EARTH MOVED AROUND SHELL

> Airform connection to the slab detail
250mm 250mm 30mm 120mm
1:10
90 Caisson

CHAMBER

PRECAST RETAINING WALL TO ENGINEER’S SPEC REINFORCEMENTS BOLTED TO RETAINING WALL REINFORCEMENTS WELDED TO REBAR LAYER IN SHELL

EXCAVATED EARTH REPLACED

STRUCTURE

SHOTCRETE, 20mm, FINISHING LAYER PREFABRICATED AIRFORM POLYEUTHANE FOAM REINFORCEMENT TO ENGINEER’S SPEC IN-SITU CONCRETE APPLIED TO FOAM REINFORCEMENT CONTINUES TO SLAB

AIRFORM COMBINATION POINT

TATE RAISED FLOOR SYSTEM

POINT, BOLTED TO SLAB

^ Meeting point of airforms detail ^ Retaining wall void detail 150mm 150mm 30mm120mm 15 1560 60
AIRFORM CONTINUATION ANCHOR
COLLISION DETAIL 1:10 1500mm 1520 50 60 300mm
AFTER
COMPLETION RC AIRFORM SHELL VOID STRUCTURE DETAIL 1:20 Caisson 91

Detailed Design System 2: Rammed Earth

The second detail iteration features a rammed earth design. The structure is created using rammed earth blocks, creating a dome. As extra reinforcements, a reinforced concrete beam encircles each dome, which also serves as reinforcements for the meeting point of two separate domes.

In order to reinforce the void, an additional steel beam encircles the base of each void structure, bolted into the blocks. The void rammmed earth blocks are then built atop the beam, with a finishing layer then applied to the exterior of the structure before returning the displaced soil to the site.

LOW-E DOUBLE GLAZING WITH ARGON AIR GAP

100X150 RAMMED EARTH BLOCKS

BLOCKS FIXED TO BRACING STRUCTURE

FINISHING MORTAR LAYER

DAMP PROOF MEMBRANE

DOME FROM RAMMED EARTH BLOCKS, FABRICATED IN-SITU

STEEL CIRCULAR BRACING, BOLTED TO EARTH BLOCKS

> Rammed earth shell void detail
1000mm 170mm 25mm 50mm 150mm150mm 600mm
RAMMED EARTH SHELL VOID DETAIL 1:10
92 Caisson

EARTH FINISHING LAYER

DAMP PROOF MEMBRANE

EXCAVATED EARTH REPLACED POST-COMPLETION

DOME FROM RAMMED EARTH BLOCKS, FABRICATED IN-SITU

LAYER OF LIGHTWEIGHT COMPRESSED EARTH

DAMP PROOF MEMBRANE

FINISHING MORTAR LAYER

DRAINAGE GUTTER

400MM REINFORCED CONCRETE TRANSFER BEAM

90MM INTERNAL DOWNPIPE

100X150 RAMMED EARTH BLOCKS

TATE RAISED FLOOR SYSTEM

CONCRETE SLAB TO ENGINEER’S SPEC

DRAINAGE TO FILTRATION SYSTEM

^ Rammed earth shell collision detail 20mm 100mm 90mm 400mm 30mm120mm 150mm 150mm
RAMMED EARTH SHELL COLLISION DETAIL 1:10
Caisson 93

Detailed Design System 3: Steel Curtain Wall Diagrid System

The third detail iteration features a steel and glass diagrid system, with each triangle resembling a unitised curtain wall system. The form is constructed using 100mm vertical steel bars, and 90mm transverse bars. Each transverse bar is bolted to 120mm steel node. Each vertical steel bar is welded to the node for additional vertical stability.

The form is then clad to create the cave-like effect within the space, using concrete cladding connected through stack joints that are bolted to the mullions. Where voids are nessesary, the stack joints connect glass panels. The exterior of the form is then clad with concrete and the displaced earth is returned to site.

STEEL AND GLASS SHELL CURTAIN WALL DETAIL

STEEL AND GLASS SHELL CURTAIN WALL DETAIL

IN SITU CONCRETE REINFORCED TO STEEL SHELL

100MM RADIAL BARS, WELDED TO NODE

90MM BATT INSULATION

IN SITU CONCRETE REINFORCED 100MM RADIAL BARS, WELDED

90MM CURTAIN WALL MULLION, BOLTED TO STACK JOINT 12MM PLASTERBOARD

90MM BATT INSULATION 90MM CURTAIN WALL MULLION, 12MM PLASTERBOARD

CABLE TRAY SKIRTING

CABLE TRAY SKIRTING

CURTAIN WALL STACK JOINT, BOLTED TO NODE

BASE STRUCTURE NODE, BOLTED TO SLAB

TATE RAISED FLOOR SYSTEM

CURTAIN WALL STACK JOINT,

TATE RAISED FLOOR SYSTEM

CONCRETE SLAB TO ENGINEER’S SPECIFICATION

BASE STRUCTURE NODE, BOLTED CONCRETE SLAB TO ENGINEER’S

> Stack Joint and node connection to ground detail
1:5
1:5
94 Caisson

STEEL AND GLASS SHELL GROUND CONNECTION DETAIL 1:20

100MM RADIAL BARS, WELDED TO HEAVY GAGUE STEEL NODE

90MM TRANSVERSE BARS, BOLTED TO NODE SOCKET REQUIRED ANGLE

20MM BOLTS

10MM NODE SOCKET, WELDED TO NODE

WELDED CONNECTION

100MM RADIAL BARS, WELDED TO HEAVY GAGUE STEEL NODE

90MM TRANSVERSE BARS, BOLTED TO NODE SOCKET AT REQUIRED ANGLE

20MM BOLTS

10MM NODE SOCKET, WELDED TO NODE

WELDED CONNECTION

100MM RADIAL BARS, WELDED TO NODE

90MM TRANSVERSE BARS, SPAN DEPENDENT ON ANGLE OF PLACEMENT

AREA DEPENDENT ON CORRESPONDING SPANS AND ANGLES

120MM BASE NODE, BOLTED TO SLAB

CONCRETE SLAB TO ENGINEER’S SPEC

100MM RADIAL BARS, WELDED TO NODE 90MM TRANSVERSE BARS, SPAN DEPENDENT ON ANGLE OF PLACEMENT

AREA DEPENDENT ON CORRESPONDING SPANS AND ANGLES

120MM BASE NODE, BOLTED TO SLAB

CONCRETE SLAB TO ENGINEER’S SPEC

STEEL AND GLASS SHELL GROUND CONNECTION DETAIL 1:20

STEEL AND GLASS SHELL NODE DETAIL 1:2

STEEL AND GLASS SHELL NODE DETAIL 1:2

^^ Steel and glass connection to ground detail ^ Node detail
Caisson 95

Digital Workflow Forms for Analysis

the paramaterisation

The forms use two kinds of digital

a simple pneumatic form for the single

and subdivided freeform geometry for the

forms of the model. The pneumatic forms were

through form finding, while the free forms had to be optimised through a genetic algorithm and fitness

had a FEM analysis conducted. The various

forms for analysis are seen in the left figure. The

workflow can be seen on the following page.

> Chamber types (Hao Yan)
The next step was
and analysis of the forms digitally.
structures,
chambers,
continuous
optimised
landscape. Both forms
digital
digital
1 Chamber type 1 Generic, Universal, Formal Foyer, Restaurant, Cellar door, Gallery, Multi-Room 2 Chamber type 2 Maximum view & openings Restaurant, Suites 3 Chamber type 3 Maximum light, Uncomfortable to stay Transitional space, Gallery 5 Chamber type 5 Interactive, Lower spaces Cellar door 6 Chamber type 6 Diffused light, comfortable to stay Cellar door, Restaurant, Gallery 7 Chamber type 7 Stair sitting amphitheater, tranquil Reflection wine tasting space/amphitheater 4 Chamber type 4 Softer light beams, comfortable to stay Cellar door 96 Caisson
Volumetric Design with SubD Form Finding (SubD for Rhinoceros 7) Pneumatic Form Finding FEM Structural Analysis of Pneumatic Form Genetic Optimisation from SubD Geometry Optimised Gene Pool Feedback Loop FEM Analysis Final Form Detailing and Fabrication alysis 30mm120mm 15 1560 60 Digital Workflow Diagram Caisson 97

Digital Workflow

FEM Analysis

> FEM Analysis of Chamber type 6
1 Chamber type 1 Generic, Universal, Formal Foyer, Restaurant, Cellar door, Gallery, Multi-Room 2 Chamber type 2 Maximum view & openings Restaurant, Suites Chamber Maximum light, Transitional 5 Chamber type 5 Interactive, Lower spaces Cellar door 6 Chamber type 6 Diffused light, comfortable to stay Cellar door, Restaurant, Gallery Chamber Stair sitting amphitheater, Reflection wine tasting Material: Concrete C100 Height: 3100mm Maximum Displacement: 0.48cm The following is a FEM analysis of certain geometry digitally paramaterised to be analysed. The forms are analysed using reinforced concrete parameters reflecting the reinforced airform shell details. In future, the details shall be altered to allow for a more accurate representation of pneumatic inflation. 98 Caisson
1 Chamber type 1 Generic, Universal, Formal Foyer, Restaurant, Cellar door, Gallery, Multi-Room Chamber type 2 Maximum view & openings Restaurant, Suites 5 Chamber type 5 Interactive, Lower spaces Cellar door 6 Chamber type 6 Diffused light, comfortable to stay Cellar door, Restaurant, Gallery 7 Chamber type 7 Stair sitting amphitheater, tranquil Reflection wine tasting space/amphitheater Chamber type 4 Softer light beams, comfortable to stay 1 Chamber type 1 Generic, Universal, Formal Foyer, Restaurant, Cellar door, Gallery, Multi-Room 5 Chamber type 5 Interactive, Lower spaces Cellar door 6 Chamber type 6 Diffused light, comfortable to stay Cellar door, Restaurant, Gallery 7 Chamber type 7 Stair sitting amphitheater, tranquil Reflection wine tasting space/amphitheater 4 Chamber type 4 Softer light beams, comfortable to stay Cellar door Material: Concrete C100 Height: 4200mm Maximum Displacement: 1.93cm Material: Concrete C100 Height: 3100mm Maximum Displacement: 4.4cm ^ FEM Analysis of Chamber type 1 ^ FEM Analysis of Chamber type 4 Caisson 99

Act IV: Final Design Proposal

100 Caisson

Once the concept, plans and sections had been determined, it was time to refine the selected drawings and digital forms to come to a final, developed design. The final digital workflow was decided upon, with a genetic optimisation algorithm determining the best fit forms for the design.

Once this had been resolved, the final plans, sections details and renders had to be finalised. The plans were altered to allow for the optimised forms, with the sections lending themselves to this improved plan. The details were altered to allow for internal lights, insulation and waterproofing, with the final digital renders being a culmination of the above.

Caisson 101

Final Design

Workflow

Digital
102 Caisson Optimization Based on contour Manual SubD Modeling FEM Analysis Get Contours Optimization Based on box morph Parametric model and optimization through Genetic Algorithm Chamber upper and lower boundaries Structural analysis through FEM Karamba solver Variable Scale factor Geometry Generation in CAD Manual SubD Modeling FEM AnalysisChamber upper and lower boundaries Box morph Variable Box vertices coordinates XY value Iterations Iterations Optimized Form Optimized Form

Final Design

Final Site Plan

104 Caisson
5 1 2 2 11 12 13 4 4 6 6 78 9 10 5 3 3 3 1 Ground Floor Plan Foyer Cellar door Cellar door private rooms 4 Restaurant 5 6 7 Restrooms Private dining Indoor amphitheater 8 Kitchen 9 10 11 Stair to 1st floor 13 Production entrance Cellar Spiral staircase 12 Visitor entrance 150m Caisson 105 Final Design Final Plans - Ground Level
1 11 1 2 3 2 3 Gallery Gallery (tunnel) Roof garden 4 4 Multi-purpose room 5 5 6 6 7 7 Production space Stair to ground floor Stair to second floor 8 8 Spiral staircase to ground floor 5 First Floor Plan 150m Final Design Final Plans - First Level 106 Caisson
5 Second Floor Plan 150m 1 1 1 1 1 Suites Caisson 107 Final Design Final Plans - Ground Level

Final Design

Final Sections

The final sections were developed from the previous sections in the span and space section. A key challenge was finding the correct section cut, finding a cut that outlined as many of the various shell forms as possible. The sections resulted as a composite of both group members inputs, with the design intent of both displaying the landscape and the shells underneath, as well as how users interact with the light and shadows within the spaces. Both horizontal and vertical circulation also had to be considered.

^ Final Stairway Section 1:300 108 Caisson
^ North Section 1:200 Caisson 109

Final Design

Final Sections

While not a required deliverable for the project, an axonometric section was also key. By showing how the spaces directly interact with the landscape in a three-dimensional perspective, the viewer can directly interpret the relationship between the spaces underneath and the landscape above.

^ Axonometric Section 1:300
110 Caisson
^ South East Section 1:200 Caisson 111

Final Design Detail Drawings

The shells are constructed from a number of pneumatic airforms with the structure constructed around the airform. Initially, land is excavated where the shell will be constructed, with a retaining wall being constructed on the perimeter of this land. An in-situ concrete slab is laid on site, with anchor points for the airform cast into the concrete. The prefabricated airform is then inflated, with a rebar layer and concrete being applied to the outside of the airform. The airform is then removed, with the internal spaces having a finishing layer of concrete applied. The landscape is then returned to the exterior, creating an internal open space underneath the landscape.

^ Progressive Diagram of Construction 112 Caisson

DAMP PROOF MEMBRANE

SKIRTING

CABLE

SHOTCRETE

PREFABRICATED AIRFORM POLYEUTHANE FOAM REINFORCEMENT TO ENGINEER’S SPEC IN-SITU CONCRETE APPLIED TO FOAM DISPLACED EARTH MOVED AROUND SHELL BATT INSULATION DAMP PROOF MEMBRANE

FINISHING SHOTCRETE LAYER

AIRFORM ANCHOR BOLTED

REINFORCEMENTS BOLTED

IN-SITU SLAB

ENGINEER’S

RC AIRFORM COMBINATION POINT

SHOTCRETE, 20mm, FINISHING LAYER PREFABRICATED AIRFORM POLYEUTHANE FOAM / SHOTCRETE COMPOSITE REINFORCEMENT TO ENGINEER’S SPEC IN-SITU CONCRETE APPLIED TO FOAM

REINFORCEMENT COMBINATION POINT, WELDED

REINFORCEMENT BOLTED TO STUD LAYER

^ Final Airform Slab Connection Detail ^ Meeting point of airforms detail 250mm 50mm 120mm RC AIRFORM GROUND CONNECTION DETAIL 1:10
AND
TRAY TATE RAISED FLOOR SYSTEM TATE PEDESTAL BASKET 30MM BATT INSULATION 300MM SHOTCRETE OFFSET
TO SLAB
TO SLAB
TO
SPEC 10A STANDARD PLUG
DETAIL 1:5
STEEL STUD LAYER TATE RAISED FLOOR SYSTEM ANCHOR POINT, BOLTED TO SLAB 150mm 150mm Caisson 113

Final Design Detail Drawings

It is nessesary that the voids are braced and created to be watertight. A steel ring is applied to the void, bracing the exterior. The ring is bolted to the concrete and the reinforcements, which links to the retaining wall on the exterior of the structure. The ring, acting as a typical cleat, allows for double glazed glass to span the void, creating additional bracing. The cleat and glass connection are hidden internally, creating a clean view for the user.

POLISHED

LAYER

BOLTED TO

GLASS

SOCKET, BOLTED TO BRACING

TO RETAINING WALL

> Airform Void Structure Bracing System GLASS STRUCTURE CONNECTION DETAIL 1:5
CONCRETE FINISHING
LOW E DOUBLE GLAZING WITH AIRGON AIR GAP STEEL BRACING,
CONCRETE STRUCTURE
CONNECTION
REINFORCEMENT
DAMP PROOF MEMBRANE 114 Caisson

PRECAST

DAMP

^ Airform retaining wall bracing RC AIRFORM CURVATURE AND LIGHT FITTING DETAIL
RETAINING WALL TO ENGINEER’S SPEC REINFORCEMENTS BOLTED TO RETAINING WALL REINFORCEMENTS WELDED TO REBAR LAYER IN SHELL EXCAVATED EARTH REPLACED AFTER STRUCTURE COMPLETION
PROOF MEMBRANE AC WIRING THROUGH INSULATION LAYER LIGHT FITTING FINISHING SHOTCRETE LAYER 1520 50 Caisson 115

Final Design

1:25 Model

The 1:25 physical model was created to give a more intimate view of the internal spaces itself. The ampitheatre space was chosen for this model, with multiple layers of seating and a central void, as a standard representation of many of the spaces in the design. Initially, contours were extracted from the digital model at 6mm intervals, with the contours then being printed on 6mm MDF. Once these contours were constructed, the three part model allowed for a direct internal view by one side of the shell being removable from the base.

˅ Workflow Diagram for 1:25 Model Construction
Digital Contour Model Laser Cut Contours at 6mm Incriments Assembly of Contour Strips Addition of Adhesive Completed Model
116 Caisson
^ Final 1:25 Model in Section View ^ Final 1:25 Model Caisson 117

Final Design

1:100 Model

The 1:100 physical model was constructed by digitally extracting contours from the digital model at 6mm intervals. The 6mm contours were then laser cut on 6mm MDF, which then allowed assembly to take place. The model was kept as open massing to allow for viewing inside of the model to envisage the spaces and layout. The next step was to cast plaster around the model to create the landscape.

Digital

Model

Contour Model Laser Cut Contours at 6mm Incriments Assembly of Contour Strips Addition of Adhesive Completed
˅ Workflow Diagram for 1:100 Model Construction 118 Caisson
^ Final 1:100 Model in Section View ^ Final 1:100 Model Caisson 119

Final

Renders ^ Landscape Hero Shot Render 120 Caisson
^ Render of Entrance Passage Caisson 121
^ Cellar Door Render 122 Caisson
^ Restaurant Render
Caisson
123
^ Gallery Render 124 Caisson
^ Private Dining Render Caisson 125

Glossary of Terms

Form Resistant Structure: A structure in which the form is defined by the loads beared upon it, creating form that takes shape from the material surrounding it.

Gridshell: A doubly curved structure that is constructed from a grid of material allowing synclastic and anticlastic curvature

Pre-Formed: Curvature of a shell that is determined before the erection of the form, with rigid members

Post-Formed: Curvature that is determined after the erection of the form with members that can bend and twist

Sinclastic: Form that curves toward the same side in all directions

Anticlastic: Form that curves concavely on one axis while convex on the perpendicular axis

Elastic Gridshell: A gridshell, typically constructed from timber, that is post-formed and uses elastic force to create its form

RC Shell: A gridshell like structure constructed from reinforced concrete

Pneumatic: A form created by the manipulation of compressed air on a malleable material

FEM Analysis: Finite Element Analysis. A digital analysis method that calculates loads on an object and highlights the structural performance

Rhinoceros 7: A digital 3D modelling software

Grasshopper: A plug-in for Rhinoceros allowing for improved parametric design

Parametric: Design that calculates forms within a network of numerical imputs

Kangaroo: A parametric design software for Grasshopper allowing for calculation of gridshell curvature

Karamba: FEM Analysis software

Displacement: The measurement of how successful a form is. Measures how well the structure conforms to the digital input into the software in the real world.

CAD: Computer Aided Design. Refers to digital software used to design spaces based on numerical inputs and exact dimensions.

126 Caisson

Bibliography

Afrah, 2022. Mesh Model Sketch. [image]

Christopher Andonioff, 2022. Mesh Model Sketch. [image]

Eric Saillet and Max Botton, 2011. Chateau Cheval Blanc. [Image] Available at https://www.archdaily.com/455019/chateau-cheval-blanc-winer-agences-elizabeth-christian-de-portzamparc [Accessed 8/09/2022].

Eric Saillet and Max Botton, 2011. Chateau Cheval Blanc. [Image] Available at https://www.archdaily.com/455019/chateau-cheval-blanc-winer-agences-elizabeth-christian-de-portzamparc [Accessed 8/09/2022].

Eric Saillet and Max Botton, 2011. Chateau Cheval Blanc. [Image] Available at https://www.archdaily.com/455019/chateau-cheval-blanc-winer-agences-elizabeth-christian-de-portzamparc [Accessed 8/09/2022].

Frei Otto, 1975. Mannheim Multihalle [image] Available at: https://www.designboom.com/architecture/frei-otto-a-life-of-research-construction-and-inspiration-detail-book-report-06-02-2015/ [Accessed 25th July 2022].

Hao Yan, 2022. Plans [image]

Hao Yan, 2022. Final Renders [image]

Hao Yan, 2022. Model Renders [image]

Hao Yan, 2022. Progression Diagram. [image]

Hao Yan, 2022. Section. [Image] [Accessed 8/09/2022].

Institute for Advanced Architecture, 2015. Acts on Tracks. [image] Available at: <https://www.iaacblog.com/programs/acts-on-tracks/> [Accessed 25 July 2022].

Michael Archviz, 2013. Shilda Winery. [Image] Available at https://www.x-architecture.co.uk/project/shilda/ [Accessed 8/09/2022].

Michael Archviz, 2013. Shilda Winery. [Image] Available at https://www.x-architecture.co.uk/project/shilda/ [Accessed 8/09/2022].

Michael Archviz, 2013. Shilda Winery. [Image] Available at https://www.x-architecture.co.uk/project/shilda/ [Accessed 8/09/2022].

Pietro Savorelli and Leonardo Finotti, 2012. Antinori Winery. [image] Available at: https://www.archdaily.com/371521/antinori-winery-archea-associati [Accessed 8/09/2022].

Pietro Savorelli and Leonardo Finotti, 2012. Antinori Winery. [image] Available at: https://www.archdaily.com/371521/antinori-winery-archea-associati [Accessed 8/09/2022

Pietro Savorelli and Leonardo Finotti, 2012. Antinori Winery. [image] Available at: https://www.archdaily.com/371521/antinori-winery-archea-associati [Accessed 8/09/2022

Schober, Schlaich. 2005. “New Trade Fair In Milan”. International Journal Of Shigeru Ban, 2002. Japan Pavillion. [image] Available at: https://clarewashington.wordpress.com/2012/12/10/shigeru-ban-building-with-paper-japan-pavilion-expo-2000/ [Accessed 25th July 2022].

Space Structures 20 (1): 1-14.

Caisson 127

Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.