Weishun Xu Selected Works 2009 - 2011
Univerisyt of Virginia B. S in Architecture | Class 2012 xuweishun@gmail.com Dual Degree - MArch / MLA Applicant | Fall 2012
Contents Studio Projects Opportunistic Urbanism The Future of Fermilab beyond an Archaeological Site
1
Arch 4010 | Instructor: Nana Last | Team Project with Tamrat Gebremichael
It contributes huge amounts of evidence for and - in even more impressive quan es - against each hypothesis. In A tower blocks lead to suicide, in B to happiness ever a er. In C they are seen as a first stepping stone toward emancipa on, ...in D simply a passĂŠ. - Koolhaas, The Generic City
[auto]Dependence Environmental Conservation Center
13
Arch 3020 | Instructor: Michael Beaman | Individual Work
Internal Street This por olio records the beginning of my architectural explora on from A (or any other le er from the alphabet) to Z, and beyond.
Re-Claiming Abandoned Construction Site
23
Arch 2020 | Instructor: CThomas Hogge | Individual Work
Maker’s Stories 1. Physical Speech marionette artisan trailer
33
2. Urban Ruins mechanic sculpture studio
37
Arch 3010 | Instructor: Alexander Kitchin | Individual Work
Supplementary Exploration Proxy - 10 Flocking Movement Test
47
Research Assistant for Michael Beaman | Role: en re scrip ng process; physical assemly test
Lines Art Works
49
Resume
51
Opportunistic Urbanism The Future of Fermilab beyond an Archaeological Site This project views the future of Fermilab beyond the scope of its immediate programma c needs as a suburban laboratory. It addresses two conflicts on the site: a global one between the programma c shi s dictated by socioeconomic prac ces (including CERN as a replacement of Fermilab) and the physicality shaped solely by the need for scien fic researches; a regional one between the required expansions of facili es constrained by the poli cal boundary and the tendency of physical sprawl and popula on explosion of surrounding urban centers. Thus the simple func on of the lab will collapse internally, if such program monotony is maintained ll the cessa on of the lab’s procedures. Hence, the project approaches the future development of the site through qualita ve changes of it social role rather than a linear extension of its current func onality. The ques on for the future then becomes a retrospec ve one: how to register the lab’s history without compromising the development of both Fermilab and surrounding ci es? The proposal transforms the site as a new urban center generated by a formal language of folding and ground manipula on based on the site’s infrastructures for its scien fic past. This new center discovers and re-defines Fermilab’s historical layers, and introduces a complexity of urban spaces and programs which triggers further opportunis c urban growth and densifica on. The history of Fermilab then is not a sta c image like the Stonehenge, but a dynamic one that always generates new ac vi es and forms for the future.
1
2
The nature of a scien fic research facility is to obsolete itself. Opportunis c urbanism seeks possible inserƟon of social events into the normal development (and obsole ng) pa ern of a top-down regulated laboratory. These programs then diverge into urban ac vi es and re-generate social demands for fully u lizing the site’s infrastructures (accelera on tunnels, power sta ons, etc.).
Static History 2011 A.D WĂƌƟĐůĞ ŽůůŝĚĞƌ Archaeology Origin
?
? 2400 - 2200 B.C Stonehenge
7011 A.D 2011 A.D WĂƌƟĐůĞ ŽůůŝĚĞƌ
Archaeology
Social Value / Memory ^ĐŝĞŶƟĮĐ sĂůƵĞ ͬ &ƵŶĐƟŽŶ
7011 A.D
^ŽĐŝĂů ZĞĐŽŐŶŝƟŽŶͬ/ŶƚĞƌĂĐƟŽŶ
Time
^ŽĐŝĂů ƉƉůŝĐĂƟŽŶ ŽĨ ZĞƐĞĂƌĐŚĞƐ
Social Value / Memory ^ĐŝĞŶƟĮĐ sĂůƵĞ ͬ &ƵŶĐƟŽŶ
Dynamic Urbanism
? 2400 - 2200 B.C Stonehenge
2011 A.D WĂƌƟĐůĞ ŽůůŝĚĞƌ
^ŽĐŝĂů ĞŵĂŶĚ ĨŽƌ ZĞƐĞĂƌĐŚĞƐ
7011 A.D
Archaeology Origin
Time
Social Value / Memory ^ĐŝĞŶƟĮĐ sĂůƵĞ ͬ &ƵŶĐƟŽŶ
džŚŝďŝƟŽŶ ŽŶĨĞƌĞŶĐĞ ...
Time 2011 Tevatron Shut Down
2015 DƵŽŶ ŽůůŝĚĞƌ
ŽŵŵĞƌĐŝĂů Tourism ĚƵĐĂƟŽŶ ... 2025 Muon Shut Down
ZĞƐŝĚĞŶĐĞ EĞǁ ZĞƐĞĂƌĐŚĞƐ /ŶĚƵƐƚƌLJ ... 2050 hƌďĂŶ ĞŶƚĞƌ
??
??
??
20?? 30?? ĞŶƐŝĮĐĂƟŽŶ Urban Growth
The long-term placement of new programs considers both current and future development of research facili es, and converges existing acƟvity centers and spaces as infrastructures for social events to a ach to.
Activity Centers
3
Direct Connection
2015 Development Plan
Activity Convergence before Muon
Activity Convergence After Muon
4
The ac vity convergence simulaon provides three prototypical condi ons for formal interven on when ac vity connecons parallel, run across or mesh with the exis ng infrastructures. This generates three stages of opportunis c urban development with dierent programs and a tudes towards the exis ng site and its surroundings.
Site Section Concepts
The axes of ground manipula on and volume inseron are generated by both the physical connec ons between exis ng infrastructures such as accelera on tunnels and buildings, and the possible future convergence of civic and research ac vity centers.
Events
Stage 1: Exposure
TTarget Ta arg rget get ett
Stage 2: Regeneration
Events
Stage 2: Regeneration
2 1
3
Stage 1: Exposure
Stage 3: Fusion
Events
Intervention vs. Infrastructure
Excavating
5
Folding
Stage 3: Fusion
Connecting
Synthesizing
6
Stage 1: Exposure Opportunis c urbanism starts as the Tevatron Accelerator is shut down. While other parts of the lab are s ll func oning, the exposure of exis ng infrastructures and inser on of interac ve programs generate dialogues between the public and the lab. The first stage allows the society to re-posiƟon science to prepare the site for later developments.
Existing Conditions
7
^ŽĐŝĂů ZĞĐŽŐŶŝƟŽŶ
džŚŝďŝƟŽŶ Conference 2011 ... Tevatron Shut Down
New Researches Industry 2025 ... Muon Shut Down
Site Transformation
8
Stage 2: Regeneration The second stage seeks to intensively re-claim the rich infrastructures and generate urban programs while preserving the physicality of the site a er the cessa on of par cle collisions caused by social-economic prac ces. It results in contextualized urbanizaon processes that are ini ated by opportunies provided by the history of the site. Such processes in turn allow the history to conƟnue developing and formally addressing itself.
Existing Conditions
9
^ŽĐŝĂů ƉƉůŝĐĂƟŽŶ
^ŽĐŝĂů ZĞĐŽŐŶŝƟŽŶ
^ŽĐŝĂů ĞŵĂŶĚ ĨŽƌ ZĞƐĞĂƌĐŚĞƐ ŽŵŵĞƌĐŝĂů New Researches dŽƵƌŝƐŵ /ŶĚƵƐƚƌLJ 2025 ... 2015 ĚƵĐĂƟŽŶ DƵŽŶ ŽůůŝĚĞƌ ... DƵŽŶ ^ŚƵƚ ŽǁŶ
DƵƐĞƵŵ /ŶĚƵƐƚƌLJ 20?? ... ĞŶƐŝĮĐĂƟŽŶ
Site Transformation
10
Stage 3: Fusion Proposed Detector Connec on
The third stage is a response to the /ŶƚĞŐƌĂƟŽŶ ͬ DƵƚĂƟŽŶ
sprawling of surrounding developments. It integrates the fabric of the new urban center with adjacent suburbs. Programs are generated by considering the social demands from both sides. The result is a mixture of both spaces and social ac vi es centered around the core culture of Fermilab.
Data Processing Infrastructure Entertainment Connec on Entertainment Connec on
ŽŵŵĞƌƟĂů ... 20?? 30?? ĞŶƐŝĮĐĂƟŽŶ hƌďĂŶ 'ƌŽǁƚŚ
ZĞƐŝĚĞŶƟĂů ĚƵĐĂƟŽŶ ŶƚĞƌƚĂŝŶŵĞŶƚ ...
Research Center
Research Center Transi on Zone Park Stadium
Existing Conditions
11
Site Transformation
12
[auto]Dependence Environmental Conservation Center The concept of environmental conserva on challenges the necessity of a normal architectural interven on due to the conflict between the self-regula on of the nature and the superimposed design strategies. This ever-changing ecology in Washington DC further magnifies the eect of ar ficial disturbance on the natural systems and its poli cal implica on. In response to the bo om-up nature of the conserva on program, this project proposes architecture as a process of selfregula on and adapta on that results in strategies in spa al organiza on. U lizing Roosevelt Memorial Bridge as a superstructure of grid regula on for minimal footprint, the building is interpreted from a program automata process dependent on both the internal rela onship among its programs and the possible changes in the landscape. The light-weight carbon fiber construc on allows varia ons of the built form throughout me, so that at any given moment the building is able to re-configure itself to trace the evolu on of the ecosystem. Meanwhile, the evolving forms manifest the changing nature of the ecosystems as an a tude of bo om-up environmental conserva on against the poli cally superimposed sta c plan of the Na onal Mall.
13
14
A
B
B Precondi on: The current earth-filling strategy polarizes the ecosystem into two modes of life cycles determined by flood planes. The annually flooded land is separated from the one elevated by the original bedrock.
A
C
B Conserva on as DiversificaƟon: Proposed earth-filling connects both ecosystems to generate a new system of annual migraƟon. The flow of organic ma ers promotes the long-term health of the nature in the city.
15
Top-down | Program > Relationship
Bottom-Up | Relationship > Program
The Na onal Mall and the Arlington Na onal Cemetery area provide planned landscapes as figures highlighted by top-down regula ons. Every niche is evaluated at a sta c moment and maintains this status. It is an arƟficial nature manifested and limited by imposed forms.
Programs connected by the site are generated under dynamic rela onships between the grids, forming a self-sustaining urban ecology juxtaposed against the top-down planned na onal mall. It is the designer’s responsibility to manifest the monumentality of the spontaneity of this natural arƟficiality.
A
C
The placement of architecture is ini ated by landscape manipula on, and the growth of the building must parallel the changes of the ecosystems.
B Re-distribu on as StabilizaƟon: A second step of land re-distribu on is proposed a er the new ecosystem is formulated to balance the patch areas, so that the three ecosystems can stand environmental disturbance. 16
Design Concept Mapping
Internal Program Logic
Flooding Material Flows
WĂƚĐŚ ZĞůĂƟŽŶƐŚŝƉ
Surrounding Programs
WƌŽŐƌĂŵŵĂƟĐ Dependence
Ecological Change
I+N
ŽƵŶĚĂƌLJ ŽŶĚŝƟŽŶ
ŵĞƌŐĞŶĐĞ ^ŝŵƵůĂƟŽŶ
I+A
/ŶƚĞƌĂĐƟŽŶ /ŶĚŝĐĂƚĞ
PROGRAM AUTOMATA
Other Disturbance
P+A ++
Planning Principles
&ŽƌŵĂů DĂŶŝĨĞƐƚĂƟŽŶ
Urban Ecology
KƌŐĂŶŝnjĂƟŽŶ Dependence
+
/
-
+
+
--
/
-
--
++
+
/
/
+
+
P+N N/A
A simula on process is used to evaluate the rela onship between the programs and the nature as well as among programs. The cube system responds to the grided structure of the bridge, to which the building is structurally a ached.
1
5
2
6
3
7
4
8
1
8
4 5 12 3
17
1
Generic Distribu on, G0
Primi ve Organiza on, G1
Primi ve Evalua on, G2
Secondary Distribu on, G3
Secondary Evalua on, G4
Evolu on, G5
Evolu on, G7
Evolu on, G11
Evolu on, G15
Evolu on, G19
Evolu on, G26
Evolu on, G30
1
6 7
Entrance
Outdoor
Woody Plant
City Program
Educa on
Migra on
Administra on
Water Covered
1
Annual Flood
Research
Herbaceous
1
Annual Growth
1
1 18
Individual Behavior - Niches
Group Behavior - Patches
Study of sample unit clusters from the simula on informs typical program groups that func on as a room. The size of each unit cube is determined by the grid of the bridge.
The general pa ern of the simula on determines the chance of distribu on in rela on to other clusters and boundary for each unit type.
Public Patch
Education Patch
Administration Patch
Research Patch
19
20
Carbon Fiber System The construc on method serves the need of renewing the lightweight cells as moveable units that trace the life-cycles in the ecosystem.
Insulated Glazing
Aluminum Waterproof Mullion with Bolted Skin Self-Cleaning Plas c Fabric with Polymer Film Carbon Fiber Foam Aluminum Rib Steel Reinforcing Bar
Non-Structural Skin
Carbon Fiber Steel Reinforcing Bar Foam Insula on Self-Cleaning Plas c Fabric with Polymer Film
Secondary Structure - Ribs
Primary Structure - Carbon Fiber
Bracket Bolted into Founda on
Cast Concrete Founda on
Exis ng Structure of Roosevelt Memorial Bridge
21
22
Internal Street Re-Claiming Abandoned Construction Site The site is a 11 story hotel abandoned a er the construc on of reinforced concrete structure in Historic Downtown, Charlo esville, VA. It stands as the tallest structure in the city, symbolizing a failure of the development mode ini ated by blind funding for grand businesses, while the surrounding small shops maintain a high level of commercial ac vi es in the same area. The proposal seeks to gradually re-integrate the structure into Downtown’s public actvi es with an emphasis on street life and social interac on.
23
24
Commercial
Production Office Pathway
Commercial Commercial
Activity Lv.1
Main St.
2nd St.
Main St.
Public Activity Activity Lv.2
Site
Driving Speed Zone
Pathway
Site
Activity Lv.3
Office Production
25
Walking Speed Zone
Program Rupture
Circulation Disconnectivity
The lack of program along the site and the different typology of programs on parallel streets break the conƟnuous experience of Downtown as the core of the city.
An abrupt shi of circula on mode from automobile to walking segregates the experience of the street’s unified facades and programs.
Commercial Walking Street Entry from Rivanna Trail Offices/Production/Parking 26
Program Expansion The proposal extends interac ve programs from Downtown to the site to expand the social idenĆ&#x;ty of the city center.
Mechanical
Open Theatre Entrance/ Street Performance
Mechanical
Cafe Collec vvee o Studio
Motel Cell
Motel Cell
S rage Sto Storage Courtyard Cafe
Internal Street To provide an enclosed mode of communicaĆ&#x;on that matches the atmosphere of Downtown, the street access is shi ed into the exis ng structure.
Motel Cell Collec ve Studio
Collec ve Studio Shops
Shops
Art Shops Shops Sh ops op ps Art Shops
Ind ndivid nd dua ual Individual Per e formin ng Performing
Communica on Pla orm Gallery Gallery Pathwayy
Individual Studio
27
Communica on Pla orm
Motel Cell
Collec ve Studio
Collec ve Studio
Art Shops Sho Sh op ops ps ps Art Shops
Performance Prepara on
28
Organization Progress
29
$
Expansion of City Square
Topographic Adjustment
Longitudinal Access
Resulting Program: theatre
Resulting Program: street shops
Vertical Street
Social Interaction Promotion
Future Reclaimation of Upper Levels
Resulting Program: studio, motel
Resulting Program: gallery, conference
Resulting Program: housing
Resulting Program: cafe, gathering space
30
Room Pototypes The organiza on of public programs is based on a ver cal re-distribuĆ&#x;on of
prototypical interacĆ&#x;on spaces in Downtown to maintain a coherent spaal atmosphere.
31
32
Maker’s Story 1: Physical Speech marionette artisan trailer We rely on language as our main source of information and the most ef icient way of expression. However, language itself is so precise and programmed that it begins to constrain us. The intention of this travelling Airstream trailer is to construct a boundless way of storytelling through the making and theatrics of marionettes, which is a physical expression of ideas through light, sound, movement and other scenes. Although less precise, physical communication is more genuine and informative.
33
34
Object to Experience As the trailer travels within and between ci es, the maker’s transcendental experience of the city is conveyed not only through the marione es, but also through the maker’s physical ac vi es. Linked by a central chain loop, the shi ing of the programs is juxtaposed with the moving figure of the maker opera ng the en re system. The furniture responds to the way the space is used, which is another physical manifesta on of the stories.
Story & Feedback Loop
Fabrication Mode 35
Story Design Mode
Living Mode 36
Maker’s Story 2: Urban Ruins mechanic sculpture studio This site in Philadelphia is located at the intersecon of urban fabrics, where an elevated railway brutally cuts through a 300 year old worker class community. This railway eliminates the mixed-use buering zone between Fishtown community on the east and the abandoned industrial area on the west, where people from the community used to make their contribu ons to the city. The proposal a empts to re-connect the workers to their industrial past, taking the form from a generator in loosely constructed ruins, to synthesize the two zones via programma c and physical connec on. The project is a deliberate explora on in the phenomenological transla on of architectural metaphors into spaces via physical modeling processes that resemble in working style the community cra speople’s physical touch.
37
38
Site Analysis City Scale
Community Scale
Block Scale
The site is located at the convergence point of urban axes that define the boundary of Fishtown. The view from the site should be extended to the edge of this community and beyond to posiƟon the community in a larger context both physically and socially.
By nega vely affec ng the street life, an elevated light rail islolates the working class community from the abandoned industries where people used to work. It builds up a segregaƟon between a community and its physical memory. The proposal reac vates both material flows and human resources to rediscover the community’s cultural iden y with both programs and physical access.
The spa al organiza on seeks for maximum porosity in order to coverge the movement of recycled industrial materials and the movement of cra speople from the community. It also seeks to rejuvenate the dilapidated bike shop by direc ng circulaƟon around the exisƟng building.
Activity Flow
Exhibition / Interaction Zone
Material Flow Material Processing Zone
Disturbed Gound The ground surface is both lifetd and sunken throughout the spa al sequence. It is a metaphor of eleva ng the community members’ earthy cra s to high-figure mechanical art, and also directly responds to the displacement of social idenƟty brought by the programmaƟc changes depending on their relaƟve height to the elevated raiway. 39
40
Evolution of Models The modeling explora on a empts to interpret the form of metaphors by taking on the senses of mechanical ar sts during hand cra processes. It starts with expression via materials and ends with phenomenological experience during manipula ng the same material.
41
42
Progression of a Place The design is supposed to generate the sense of a place, a field where no specific constructed object other than the central corridor is defined. It a empts to achieve so by de-emphasizing the thresholds between the interior and exterior.
1
4
5
3
2
2
6
7
1. Outdoor Gathering 2. Sculpture Chamber 3. Material Exhibit 4. Cooking Area 5. Living Room 6. Bathroom 7. Exis ng Bike Shop
1
2 3 4
5
1. Assembly Stage 2. Sculpture Chamber 3. Exhibi on Corridor 4. Design Studio 5. Bedroom 6. Balcony 7. Exis ng Bike Shop
7 6
3 1
2
1. Joining / Welding Sta on 2. Cu ng Sta on 3. Tools / Prepara on
43
44
Perspective Looking into Fishtown
Existing Condition
45
46
Proxy - 10 Flocking Movement Test [in progress] Proxies are construc ons that examine the nature of generic architectural problems within: programming, process, procedures, manufacturing and assembly. This tenth version is generated around a flocking model that extracts an overall
General Flocking Model (Processing)
spa al distribu on and movement of a group based on generic individual choices. Each individual has exactly the same deci-
Accumulated Units
Node Connection
Possible Unit 1
Possible Unit 2
sion making mode, and this model is used to test how a general group with unconsciousness of interest in movement can possibly be encouraged to interact with constructed objects placed according to the group’s movement pa ern.
Cluster Generation (Processing) Boundary Condition
Speed
Acceleration
Intensity Calculation (Grasshopper)
Velocity Distance
Attraction
Cluster
Mechanism of Individual Movement 47
Accumulation of Built Units (Processing - Grasshopper)
Assemby Test (Part from Proxy 8) 48
The Lines Art Works A line is the simplest geometry that depicts the space of its own. My sketches are an exploration on the capability of lines in de ining its own spaces with a certain line type logic while depicting actual concrete objects.
The Tangental 49
The Diagonal 50
WEISHUN XU
EDUCATION University of Virginia - Charlottesville,VA B. S. Architecture Candidate | August 2009 – May 2012(Expected) Overall GPA: 3.83/4.0 | Major GPA: 3.85/4.0
Zhejiang University of Technology - Hangzhou,China B. Arch Candidate | September 2007 – June 2009 Overall GPA: 3.84/5.0
ACADEMIC APPOINTMENTS Teaching Assistant - U.Va
434-466-6368 | xuweishun@gmail.com 2021 Ivy Road, Apt B2 | Charlottesville, VA 22903
2010 U. Va SARC Graduation Exhibition • May - June 2010; • Project 3 from ARCH 3010 selected on behalf of Kitchin studio.
2009 U. Va End of the Year Exhibition • December 2009; • Project 3 from ARCH 2020 selected on behalf of Hogge studio.
Sustainable Design Competition at ZJUT (Professional Level Second Prize) • October 2008; • Team project with Zheng Lv.
• January - May 2012 for ARCH 3020 Architectural Design II (Appointed); • August - December 2011 for ARCH 1010 Lessons of the Lawn.
LEADERSHIP / ACTIVITIES
• August 2011 - May 2012 with Virginia Teaching Fellow Michael Beaman.
Advocacy Officer|Habitat for Humanity - U.Va
• Spring 2010; • Fall 2010; • Spring 2011.
Copy Editor|Lunch vol. 7, Student Journal of School of Architecture - U.Va
Research Assistant - U.Va Dean’ s List - U.Va
Second Class Scholarship - ZJUT • 2007-2008; • 2008-2009.
Webmaster & Exec Board|American Institute for Architecture Students - U.Va • August 2010 – Present. • September 2011 – Present. • November 2010 – Present.
Project Assistant|Fallow City Project - U.Va • January 2010 – April 2010.
Advocacy Officer|Chinese Student and Scholar Society - U.Va • August 2009 – March 2010.
COMPETITIONS / EXHIBITIONS DesCours 2011 Exhibition (Withdraw from fabrication) • December 2011;
Vice Minister|Student Council in School of Architecture and Engineering - ZJUT • October 2007 – June 2009.
Member|Chinese Young Volunteers Association - ZJUT • September 2007 – August 2009.
• Team project with Michael Beaman and Zaneta Hong.
SLANT Garden Competition (Long List Garden Design Award) • August 2011; •Team project with Patrick Bradley and Jinhui Huang.
Spain-China 2011 Competition • August 2011; • Team project with Fang Qiu and Jing Wang.
2011 Washington Unbuilt Competition (Entry to 2011 Design DC Exhibition) • June 2011; • Entry to 2011 Design DC exhibi on.
U. Va Car of the Future / Future of the Car • November 2010; • Team project with Jinhui Huang and Yi Li. 51
CAREER EXPERIENCE
Externship|NADAAA - Boston,MA(Scheduled) • January . 2 – January . 13, 2011.
Internship|H+D Studio - New York City,NY • June 2011 – August 2011.
Internship|Christopher Counts Studio - Charlottesville,VA • March 2010 – April 2010; July 2010 – January 2011.
Externship|Architecture Design and Research Institute of Zhejiang University - Hangzhou,China • January 2010.
Program Coordinator|UK Education Advisory Services - Hangzhou,China • October 2008. 52