Ying Qin Portfolio

Landscape Architecture

PORTFOLIO

2017

YING QIN

01 02 03 04 05 06

HEALING ENVIRONMENT

Resilience: A Healing Journey of human and natural system Page:1-19

COME ALIVE OUTSIDE DESIGN CHALLENGE

Memphis Catholic Middle and High School

Page:14-21

PLANNING

Break the Boundary: A Brownfield Community Plan Page:22-29

LANDSCAPE PERFORMANCE

Mississippi Heritage Museum

Page:30-41

EPA CAMPUS RAINWATER CHALLENGE

Disconnect to Connect: A Watershed Experience Page:44-55

CONSTRUCTION DETAILS Page:56-64

Google Earth

ASLA, MS. Chapter Honor Award

Resilience: A healing Journey of human and natural system

01

Mississippi State University 2017

Chadwick Lake is situated at the intersection of Highway 182 and George Perry Street in Mississippi State University (MSU), Starkville. The Lake has existed since 1960, and it is named Chadwick for memorializing William Dean Chadwick who was an athletic director and a famous coach at Mississippi A&M (today is known as MSU). The site is close to the MSU athletic fields, which are devoted to physical activity, containing a softball area, a baseball area, a coliseum for basketball , a football practice facility, an athletic track, tennis courts, and the Sanderson Center (gym), which more than 2000 people use daily. To the north of the site is the MSU Rodney Foil Plant Science Center and a large area of the farm. Because of “Starkville - Oktibbeha Consolidated School District� plan. A 42.8 acre Partnership Middle school and Rural Education Institute will be built to the east in 2018 for about 900 students. The project site has 61 acres: 13.2 acre of water area and 10.7 acre parking lot. The lake condition has runoff, erosion, and pollution problems, which are causes by campus development, and human activities.

1

Project Statement This project focuses on establishing a healing environment on the campus to reduce the daily pressures of students, faculty, and staff. This space will help them overcome emotional and mental blocks, as well as provide strategies for wildlife re-habitation.

A healing environment will help students to escape the stresses of work and school and release their burdens.

They can enjoy their happy moments with friends, or appreciate a quiet environment in solitude. The site is also open to the public, so that visitors can escape the busyness of the city and be free to release their emotions.

For the ecological functions, the design should be highly sustainable with a functional stormwater control system that respects nature. More importantly, the project needs to emphasize the natural healing systems that help wildlife Watershed map habitat restoration. Visitors can experience eco-tourism on The Project Site the site. For the educational function, the site can also be Stream Corridor used as a healing environment that demonstrates natural systems, wildlife, stormwater management, and even arts Water Flow from the area. This site has the potential to be a popular, Davis Wade Stadium iconic area on campus, and in the city of Starkville.

Barr

Ave .

Circulation

Bus Stops Shuttle

Perdestrain Facilities Bike Lanes

Context map The Project Site Starkville Middle School (in 2018) Hwy 182 Hwy 12

2

Driving Routes

Lake Existing Conditions & Water Test

1

2

5

Unsanitary cups and bottles on the Southside of the lake. This is one of the most contaminated areas in the lake because of water runoff from the south of campus, which washes off to the lake through a large pipe located under the water.

Some areas located along the lakes edge consists of copious amounts of algae. It occurs when the water is relatively stable, and accumulates a high concentration of nitrates and phosphates. Excessive algae can cause water to produce a bad odor, and cause health risks to aquatic species.

6

3

4

Six water test areas

Erosion is a problem on the site. In 2016, a new sea wall was built on the northwest portion of the lake to protect severe erosion. This project cost $175,000, and the site has three sea walls.

I used Hydrolab MS5 to do the basic water test.

3

NTU: 55.05

Water Quality In-situ test

LDO: 9.01 mg/L

1

Basic Parameters

PH: 7.6 Tem: o 17.26 C

ORP: 164.0 mv

NTU: 110.03

4

Tem: o 15.16 C

PH: 7.2

ORP: 195 mv

In-situ test

SPC: 331.3 µS/cm

PH: 8.5 Tem: o 15.68 C

3

PH: 8.1

ORP: 144.3mv

SPC: 318.1µS/cm

In-situ test

LDO: 8.11 mg/L

6

ORP: 182 mv

SPC: 327.3 µS/cm

.

NTU: 153

Water Quality LDO: 8.77 mg/L

Basic Parameters

LDO: 6.55 mg/L

Basic Parameters

Tem: o 16.94 C

NTU: 70.63

5

ORP: 125.3 mv

In-situ test

SPC: 317 µS/cm

Water Quality LDO: 6.95 mg/L

Basic Parameters

Basic Parameters

NTU 45.33

Water Quality LDO: 7.27 mg/L

2

Tem: o 15.09 C

In-situ test

PH: 8.2

In-situ test

SPC: 346.3 µS/cm

Water Quality

NTU: 99.45

Water Quality

Basic Parameters

PH: 8.4 Tem: o 18.23 C

ORP: 202 mv

SPC: 309.7µS/cm

PH: Acidity and alkalinity Temp: Temperature SPC: Specific Conductance ORP: Oxidation Reduction Potential LDO: Luminescent Dissolved Oxygen NTU: Nephelometric Turbidity Units

Water Test Results PH:This test assesses Temp: Water the acidic composition of water.The range is from 7 to 14. Acidic < 7< basic. PH is influenced by chemicals, organic materials,soil composition, and acid rain. It can test the amount of nutrients that affect aquatic life living in the water. Also, PH can determine the toxic degree of heavy metals.

The PH level for water on this site varies in different areas. The lowest PH is 7.2 in #2 spots. The highest PH is 8.5 in #5 location. Most fish can live in PH range between 6.0 and 9.0 with a little alkalinity of 20 mg/L.

4

SPC: This is a test temperature relates to for electrical currents. aquatic life, and water The results are influenced by sodium, chemistry. Higher water temperature will chloride, nitrate, oil, cause a greater chemical s u l f a t e , i r o n , a n d temperature. High reaction rate that will threat biological activity. specific conductance oxygen in warm water means that higher will be lower than in cool concentrations of dissolved-solids, water, which cannot provide enough oxygen determine the water use for aquatic species. The for different aspects such temperature of the site is as industrial, cultivation, or household use. The between 59.2 F0 and conductivity ranges from 64.8 F0, which is a stable condition for fish. 10 to 1000 µS cm-1.

ORP: This is "a measure L D O : “ D i s s o l v e d L D O : “ D i s s o l v e d of the tendency of a chemical species to acquire electrons and thereby be reduced(Wikipedia).”

The range is from -999 to +999. If the number is low, bacteria will increase due to low dissolved oxygen. A range of ORP in health waters should be between 300 to 500 mv. The site's condition is lower than 3 0 0 m v, w h i c h m e a n s that the water has a high bacteria problem.

oxygen is a molecule of O2 that is dissolved into the water.(Dissolved Oxygen).” Most aquatic life needs the proper amount of oxygen in the water to survive. Fish life depends on dissolved oxygen over 5mg/L. LDO in the lake is around 6mg/L to 9mg/L. This is a basic level for aquatic species to live. Plants in water can produce more oxygen for them.

oxygen is a molecule of O2 that is dissolved into the water.(Dissolved Oxygen).” Most aquatic life needs the proper amount of oxygen in the water to survive. Fish life depends on dissolved oxygen over 5mg/L. LDO in the lake is around 6mg/L to 9mg/L. This is a basic level for aquatic species to live. Plants in water can produce more oxygen for them.

11

12

01. Woodland 02. Small Plaza 03. Patio 04. Meditation Area 05. Memorial Place 06. Outdoor Teaching Area 07. Butterfly Garden 08. Healing Island 09. Floating Island for Habitat and Water Quality 10. Picnic Area 11. Reteintion Pond 12. Forebay 13. Picnic Area 14. The Bridge 15. Terrace 16. Arts Area with Mist 17. Amphitheater with A Rain Garden 18. Seating Area 19. Wetland & Forebay 20. Rain Gardens & Trees Added to Existing Parking Area 21. Connection to New Paternership Middle School 22. Lake Edge With Steps

18

10

09

22 14

13

08 15

16

06 05

07

21

04

17 18

20

19

03

02

01

North

Master Plan

0 50’ 100’ 200’

5

01

03

02 04

05

06

08 07

“Healing” Island

11

01. The Bridge 02. Trellis 03. “Nests” with Floating Islands 04. Labyrinth 05. A Viewing Tower 06. Sculptural Fountain 07. Lake Edge with Rocks And Plants to Increase Biodiversity 08. Private Seating Area 09. Pavement with Groundcovers 10. Seating area with An Art Light Pole 11. Floating Island

North

6

0

15’

30’

60’

09

10

02

01

03

“Nests” Area Perspective Floating Island for Wildlife Habitat Improvement 01. Flaoting 02. “Nests” 03. The Bridge

DESCRIPTION The “healing” island was created to provide viewing areas and spaces for relaxation. Water falling from sculpture fountain(06) creates background noise for those on the labyrinth(04). The bird blinds offer shade space from the sun and habitat for birds.

People can sit in the “Nests” to relax, and the floating island is for wildlife such as birds and tortoises. The “nests” serve as birds blind so that users can see these wildlife from holes in the nests without disturbing them.

Water Feature

Art Light Pole

7

Memorial Area 01. Vewing Area (Memorial Place) 02. Lake Edge with Emergent Plants for Biodiversity Enhancement 03. Memorial Wall

A

01

DESCRIPTION The lake on site is named for the first athletic director o f t h e U n i v e r s i t y. T h i s particular part of the design is a memorial to him with space for recognition of other successful players and coaches.

02

03

North

8

0

5’

10’

20’

A’

DESCRIPTION The memorial area contains steel panels with silhouettes cut out in the likeness of the coach or player recognized (1). A 1 1/2” thick translucent panel (2) will have a history of the person or event etched into the surface

Viewing Area

01 02

03

Viewing Area

Memorial Wall

01. Memorial Wall with a Cut-Out Image of A Player 02. Plastic Glass Wall with A History of The Person 03. Crashed Limestone

A’ A Viewing Area (Memorial Area)

Wood Deck

Lake Edge

Walkway Memorial Area

Memorial Area Section A-A’ 9

Meditation Garden 01. The Student Recreation Center 02. Overhead Structure 03. Gateway 04. Cistern for Irrigation 05. Water Feature 06. Seating Area 07. Water Feature 08. Platform with Water Feature 09. Medicinal Plant Pavilion 10. Zen Gardens 11. Shallow Pond 12. Trellis 13. Lake edge with Emergent Plants for Wildlife Habitat Improvement

13

12

11

09

10

08 07

06

05

03

02

01

North

10

0

15’

30’

60’

04

Meditation Area Perspective

DESCRIPTION The â&#x20AC;&#x153;meditationâ&#x20AC;? garden is an extension of the student recreational center (1).

The plan contains spiritual garden (10), water features (5,7,8), and seating areas.

A medicinal plants pavilion (9) also acts as a seating area and gathering space.

Spiritual Garden Perspective DESCRIPTION A perspective of three Zen gardens. The wall has mandela patterns on it, and part is a vertical garden to enhance biodiversity. There also is translucent glass to make the wall more interesting with shadows of people moving behind walls.

11

01

Meditation Area Perspective

12

05

04

02

03

01. Medicinal Plant Pavilion 02. Seating Area with Water Feature 03. Seating Area in the Water 04. Water Feature 05. Spiritual Garden 13

14

Google Earth

The Winner Team

Come Alive Outside Design Challenge

02

Memphis Catholic Middle and High School 2015

Team Members: Ying Qin (Design) Michael Keating (Design) Yazan Mahadin (Lumion/short film) Student teams from Mississippi State University, Hinds Community College, Louisiana State University and Auburn University visited Memphis Catholic Middle and High School and worked with the students there to design an outdoor learning and relax area for them.

Michael Hatcher and Associates built the courtyard after the design.

15

01. Learning garden area (The Kitchen Community) 02. Sensory garden 03. Outdoor learning area (Tree stump seating) 04. Vertical herb garden and mural wall 05. Rain garden with a cistern and a shallow pond 06. Entrance seating area 07. Cistern water feature 08. Ferns with "MCHS" block letters 09. Playground with mulch 10. Benches with mulch 11. Pray area 12. Garden Cathedral 13. Outdoor eating area 14. Composting bins 15. Ferns and hostas 16. Ferns with fruit trees and blackberry bushes.

Project Statement

16

The design we propose brings the student into contact with nature in a variety of ways: through a butterfly and wildflower garden, a rain garden with cistern, and edible/fruit-bearing plants located in the Kitchen Community installation and throughout the design. Seasonal butterflies and edible fruit plants help to illustrate the interconnected web of life and our place in it.

Rainwater is managed in a visible and creative way to educate students about the importance of water resources today, as well as sustain a vibrant pond ecosystem next to the rain garden that brings students into contact with the water. The art wall proposal is anotherway to further show the movement of water and provide a gathering space for exploring the butterfly garden and vertical herb wall. Finally, the Marian Shrine Garden Cathedral would reuse and restore existing benches and create a more formal space for quiet reflection. The cellular learning garden brings a fresh and fun layout that allows visitors to connect with the numerous educational opportunities present throughout the entire site and to transform studentsâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; experience of the learning process into one of continuous exploration and potential.

Master Plan

0'

10'

20'

40'

17

Pray Area and Garden Cathedral Section:

The existing prayer area will be

refurbished to contain a wooden trellis (Garden Cathedral) over the Mary statue and candles while the seating area is made of reused, existing concrete benches. This will create a sense of privacy for meditation.

Water feature perspective: 18

Cistern with water-recycling overhead water feature.

Mural Wall Section (Above) and Perspective (Below): The art mural is painted above with

a watering can among clouds to illustrate the rain process, while the wall below is painted to resemble water flowing down the wall from the roof. Water from perforated gutter will drip water over recycled rain chains before collection in the cistern. The vertical herb garden made from pallets will be built against the wall for illustration of the watering process.

Mural Wall Perspective 19

#57 Limestone

http://hilltopmulch.com/ProductImages/Bulk/ Driveway/JPEG/Crush%20Run.jpg

Concrete pavers http://www.phase3.biz/core/uploads/SBCV/image/ flagstone%20foot%20path%20grass%20fill.jpg

Hardwood mulch

http://homeguides.sfgate.com/DMResize/photos.demandstudios.com/getty/ article/178/233/87516297

Pine mulch

http://tlcminnesota.com/wp-content/uploads/ Premium-Color-Ceadar-Tone-Mulch1.jpg

Pea gravel http://hillsidestone.org/~hillsidestone/tipe/ pictures/3_8_Pea_Gravel_Close_Up.jpg

Main Plants

Cost Estimate Phase 1: Kitchen Community Garden

h t t p s : / / j o n a t h a n l e w i s . f i l e s . https://www.extension.iastate. h t t p : / / w w w. t r e e to p i c s . c o m / http://stephaniesuesansmith. wordpress. edu/forestry/iowa_trees/tree_id_ t a x o d i u m _ d i s t i c h u m / b a l d _ com/wp-content/uploads/2010/ photos/DOGWOOD_PAGODA3_ cypress_1040725.png 06/redbud-tree.jpg form.jpg

White oak

Dogwood

Bald cypress

Redbud

Phase 2: Main garden installation - Walkway metal edging: 303 lf @ $12.30/lf = $3,727 - Crushed limestone path: 2,007.7 sf @ $2.70/ sf = $5,420 - Mulch path: 3,120 sf @ $0.27/sf = $842 - Donated plants planted with student volunteers: $0 - Vertical herb garden against art mural made as a class project: $0 Total Cost: $9,989 Phase 3: Rain garden and cistern water feature - Cistern and overhead water feature: $4,000 - Rain garden: $1,000 - Rain chains (recycled materials) made as class project: $0 Total Cost: $5,000

http://treepicturesonline.com/ http://3219a2.medialib.glogster. http://www.almanac.com/sites/ http://www.emmitsburg.net/ com/media/7a/7a0a6c52a2fb5 default/files/images/blackberry. gardens/articles/adams/2008/ apple-tree-4.jpg 6e17eed5f84e019abd508efa4e jpg photo/rain%20garden.jpg 7a8d822617e8937b4e610f942/ wildflowers3-jpg.jpg

Fruit tree

Wildflowers

Blackberry bush Rain garden

Phase 4: Garden Cathedral prayer area - Overhead trellis: $10,000 - Shrine area with wood platform: $1,000 Total Cost: $11,000

20

Learning garden area Perspective

Garden Cathedral Perspective

Learning garden area Perspective

21

22

Google Earth

Break the Boundary: A Brownfield Community Plan

03

Columbus, MS 2016

The Columbus site is a former wood treatment facility in operation since 1928. It spans 90 acres. KerrMcGee purchased it in 1964 and operated it until 2003. It was then that the site was closed and sealed off. Environmental testing agencies found creosote contamination in sediment samples taken from drainage ditches and near by residential property, contamination was the results by wood products were treated with the pesticide pentachlorphenol until 1976. Coal tar and creosote were also used to treat wood products until the shutdown. The company used open ditches that were located in 100-year-flood plains to transport surface water runoff from the plant into Luxapilila Creek, which spread toxic chemicals to neighboring residential areas through flooding, according to the U.S. Department of Justice.

23

02

Project Statement

04

The concept of this project is â&#x20AC;&#x153;Break The Boundaryâ&#x20AC;?. The site was an industrial area for decades. Currently it is a barren, contaminated, and abandoned place surrounded by low-income neighborhoods. From the map, people can see that there is a clear boundary between the site and the residence communities. This project is trying to give an opportunity of renascence to the site, and also give a new vision to the citizens. The plan is dedicated to be a sustainable development site that connects to the communities. Also, encouraging economic development, and address high rates of poverty is the goal of this project.

13

.

01. Healthcare Center 02. Police Station 03. Post Office 04. Mixed-use Area 05. Community Park 06. Commercial Area with a Plaza 07. Community College 08. Athletic Area 09. Retention Pond 10. Solar Power Facility 11. Swmming Pool & Vegetable Garden 12. Apartments 13. Cinema & Meeting Center

Master Plan

24

03

01

05

09 07

08

06

11

12

10

N

0’

75’

150’

300’

25

Commercial Area & Community Park Commercial land is vital to its surrounding community. It offers job opportunities, stimulates economic increase, and promote the financial stability for this low-developed community. A community park can provide a nice gathering space for local residents to relax

Community College & Althletic Area Education can help young people gain more skills and knowlege to find jobs. An athletic area close to the campus for student use, can also can be a public physical health center.

Functional Partition

26

Community Service Area The surrounding area is predominately a lowincome residential place that lacks spaces for community getherings.

The proposed police station, post office, health center and cinema can improve local residents' life quality.

Apartments Area New apartments with a swimming pool and a vegetable garden can attract more young people to live in this community.

Solar Power Facility The site is a highly contaminated area. Therefore, industrial development is not good for the improvement of the environment.

Light industrial facilities such as solar power production, can provide jobs for local people with minor environmental influence.

01

07 03

02

04

05

06

N

Enlarge Plan 01. Community Park 02. Commercial Area with A Plaza 03. Mixed-use Area 04. Apartmnt Office / Indoor gym 05. Swimming pool 06. Vegetable Garden 07. Community College

0’

15’

30’

60’

27

Community Park Perspective

Section A: Community Park 28

Vegetable Garden Perspective

Section B: Plaza 29

30

Google Earth

Pubished by: THE FIELD: ASLA Professional Practice Networks' Blog

Landscape Performance Mississippi Heritage Museum

04

Sarkville, MS 2016

Team Members: Ying Qin Michael Keating The Oktibbeha County Heritage Museum was built in 1976 in Starkville, Mississippi.The Oktibbeha Heritage Museum engages the public through both permanent and rotating exhibits that highlight local community culture and through public events, such as educational tours and fund-raising events. In 2009, a multi-year Rain Garden project was initiated through the Mississippi State University Landscape Architecture and Architecture programs. When construction finished in spring 2013, a green roof pavilion, cistern, and infiltration areas had been installed to retain and clean water on-site.

31

3

10

4

1 9 8 7

6

5 2

32

Site Plan

Stormwater Strategies

1. Rain Garden 2. Sand Filter 3. Green roof 4. Cistren 5. Dry Swale

Space / Elements

6. Amphitheater 7. Entrance Porch 8. Formal Lawn 9. Pavilion 10. Monument Sign

Introduction Awards Winner of the 2015 ACSA Collaborative Practice Award for Best Practices in School-based Community Outreach Programs Winner of the 2013 ASLA Award of Excellence for student Collaboration in Service Learning Winner of two Mississippi ASLA Honor Awards Winner of two Mississippi ASLA Merit Awards

Student Team Members Landscape Architecture, Graduate: 13 Landscape Architecture, Undergraduate: 65 Landscape Contracting & Management, Undergraduate: 19 Management of Construction & Land Development, Undergraduate: 5 Graphic Design, Undergraduate: 4 Day One Leadership Community, Undergraduate: 6 Building Construction Science, Undergraduate: 1 Art, Undergraduate: 1 Purpose: The purpose of this report is to document the ways in which the Rain Garden project has benefitted the Heritage Museum and the surrounding areas, a measurement termed Landscape Performance. Four distinct benefits will be explored: environmental, social, economic, and educational.

These benefits will be compared between before and after the installation of the Rain Garden project on the site.

Objectives: • Conduct a “Before-and-After” Inventory and Analysis Package of the Oktibbeha Heritage Museum site • Carry out established methods acquired through the Landscape Performance Series to determine the benefits of the project installation • Relate findings to the overall context of landscape performance and assess process limitations for future work 33

Circulation & Hydrology Vehicular Circulation Pedestrian Circulation Water flow

There are three streets around the site: Followship Street, Russell Street, and Hogan Street. There is no sidewalks for pedestrian and no bike lanes on the street. Rain water flows from the cemetery to the road and also from the site to the low area of Russell Street.

Vegetation & Climate & Utilities The dominant plants on the site is Oak and Crape myrtles. Most canopy trees are planted in the southwest area of the site. A 1,000 gallon cistern captures rain water from the museum roof and stores it for irrigation of the gardens and green roof. Lights added on site increase visitor security and attract people to use this space at night.

Signs on the site educate visitors of the various watershed protection measures employed to retain and clean rainwater.

Summer winds Winter winds Signs A/C Power Poles Power Box Cistern Streetlight Tap Sewer sysytern

34

Hydrology on Master Plan High Point

Low Point

Water flow

A 600 sq.ft. green roof pavilion reduces stormwater runoff and also decreases the pressure on sewer systems.

More green space replaces concrete pavement, which slows and filters water moving across the site. Runoff is collected by the bioretention system at the low area. A sand filter captures and cleans roof runoff, and a dry swale transports water to bioretention area.

35

Design and Contextual Characteristics Architectural Styles

The Heritage Museum combines several material types into its design to reflect both the architecture of the building and to connect the place to its historical roots of being a train station depot. For this reason, railroad ties edge the parking areas, simple iron posts support the green roof, and wood benches were placed along the walkways. Additionally, recycled pipe was incorporated into the bench design to further enhance the industrial features and re-use material on-site.

Social Spaces

Social gathering spaces installed in the southern grassy area, the northern flow-through planter area, and along the entrance deck have increased the programming options for the Heritage Meseum. Additionally, the green roof provides an educational tool beyond acting as a social gathering space that provides shade, protection from the elements, and lighting for nighttime events.

Surrounding Area

Russell Street to the south of the Heritage Museum has experienced rapid development in recent years and the continued development in the Cotton District area gives the Heritage Museum a great central location between downtown Starkville and the new development just to the west of Mississippi State University.

Public Safety

The design addresses visitor safety through the use of ground and overhead lighting to create safe places at night for social events. Also, the increased development of highdensity apartment housing in the immediate vicinity of the museum will create higher visitor traffic to the site as a gathering space, thereby providing a sense of security for visitors.

The green roof is locked to prevent any accidents in the absence of museum personnel.

Crosswalks along Russell will be necessary to ensure safe pedestrian travel to the site.

Legend

Green Roof

Gathering Lawn Space Stormwater Retention Area Educational/Seating Area Parking Area 36

et ell St re ss Ru

Fellowship Street 37

Environmental Benefits Description Total Impervious Area Tree Cover Shrubs Grass Total Area

Area (sf) 10963 2812 100 10519

Pre-Development Curve Number (CN) 98 77 73 80

24393

Mean CN Weighted By Total Area

Area * CN 1074374 216524 7300 841520 87.7

Description Impervious pavement Captured roof area Uncaptured roof area Flow-through Planter Infiltration Basin Green Roof Tree Cover Grass

Post-Development Area (sf) Curve Number (CN) 2240 98 0 4021 1181 98 270 0 1123.82 0 600 0 4403 77 10554.7 80

Total Area

Table 1. Stormwater runoff comparison between pre- and post-development conditions at each individual location on site where change was enacted.

Arrows indicate the transition to a more sustainable land-use type compared to pre-development condition. Final stormwater runoff flow rates (cfs) are listed below each table.

24393

Area * CN 219520 0 115738 0 0 0 339031 844376

Mean CN Weighted By Total Area

62.3

Methods for Stormwater Runoff

To determine the difference in stormwater runoff between pre- and post-development conditions, a Curve Number (CN) approach was applied to the site and weighted by total area. Google Earth historical (March 2007) and current imagery were used to determine certain landcover areas such as parking lots and roof area. The soils on the site are fine sandy loam with a very low infiltration rate (0 – 0.06 in/hr, Soil Survey Staff), categorizing them as Soil Group D according to The Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds Report (TR-55, USDA-NRCS 1986). Based on the soil group, we then used the CN table to determine the CN values for each land-cover type present on site. The CN was then weighted by specific area [Area*CN]. The following formula was used to determine a weighted CN value for the total site area: ∑(Area1 * CN1) + (Area2 * CN2) + (Area3 * CN3) + … / Total Site Area Where the Total Site Area was 0.56 acres and the CN values ranged from 0-98.

We found the mean CN value weighted by total area for pre- and post-development conditions to be 87.7 and 62.3, respectively.

Before

Spring 2009

The entrance to the historic train depot, converted to a museum, was not ADA compliant. The landscape was implemented and maintained by museum volunteers.

After

BEFORE

AFTER

Summer 2012

The entrance of the museum is now ADA and code compliant and allows for large gatherings and queuing outside the museum.

Before

Spring 2009

The parking area of the museum was over 35 feet deep of head-in parking, which was inefficient and unusable. The museum also had very little presence on the main road frontage.

Photos by Cory Gallo

38

After

Summer 2013

A large amount of impervious area was removed to create a formal lawn and green roof pavilion.

Environmental Benefits CO2 sequestration (Post-Development) Scientific Name DBH (in) CO 2 sequestered by one tree (lbs)Quantity of trees Total CO 2 Lagerstroemia sp. 10 106 5 Taxodium distichum 3 39 3 Ostrya virginiana 3 56 3 Total

Scientific Name Pyrus sp.

sequestered (lbs) 530 117 168 815

CO2 sequestration (Growth to Double Current DBH) Scientific Name DBH (in) CO 2 sequestered by one tree (lbs) Quantity of trees Total CO 2 Lagerstroemia sp.

20 290 5 Taxodium distichum 6 122 3 Ostrya virginiana 6 173 3 Total

sequestered (lbs) 1450 366 519 2335

CO2 sequestration (Pre-Development) DBH (in) CO 2 sequestered by one tree (lbs)Quantity of trees Total CO 2 sequestered (lbs) 8 267 3 801 Total 801

Carbon Storage Method Using an online tree benefit calculator (National Tree Benefit Calculator) that determines pounds per tree based on diameter breast height (DBH) and genus/species, we compared pre- and post-development carbon (C) storage in tree vegetation on site.

Specifically, we compared trees removed during demolition with trees planted in the final implementation. We did not have exact measurements on the ornamental pear trees pre-development, but the museum staff informed us that they were mature trees with about 8â&#x20AC;? DBH. Given the fact that the trees planted in 2012 are not currently at full maturity, we calculated tree C storage (lbs) for both current conditions and for when the trees double in DBH. We found no loss in C storage between the loss of pre-development trees (801 lbs.) and the planting of post-development trees (815 lbs.).

Furthermore we expect the trees to grow to hold 2,335 lbs. when they double in DBH. Limitations: We were unable to include shrubs and herbaceous plants in the comparison, simply for lack of information on the amounts of C storage for various shrub species. C storage information is more available for tree species as opposed to shrub and herb species.

Shade ComparisonShade ComparisonPre-development Pre-development

Monarch Butterfly http://weknowyourdreams.com/ images/butterfly/butterfly-04.jpg

Hummingbird

http://www.usurnsonline.com/ wp-content/uploads/2011/04/ hummingbird.jpg

Honey Bee

http://www.almanac.com/sites/ default/files/images/honeybee.jpg

Species Comparison Method A species comparison between pre- and post-development revealed a significant increase in the post-development planting diversity (82 species) compared to pre-development (6 species). The new plantings are completely comprised of native species that are important food and nesting areas for bird, butterflies, and other pollinators. Plant density increases were concentrated in bioretention areas which are an important part of the water retention and purification capacity as well as habitat creation to support a more diverse ecosystem.

Shade ComparisonShade ComparisonPost-development Post-development

MorningMorning Afternoon Afternoon Seasonal Seasonal Season Season Acres Acres (sq.ft) (sq.ft) (sq.ft) (sq.ft) AverageAverage (sq.ft) (sq.ft)

MorningMorning Afternoon Afternoon Seasonal Seasonal Season Season Acres Acre (sq.ft) (sq.ft)(sq.ft) (sq.ft) AverageAverage (sq.ft) (sq.ft)

Spring Spring 1,713

SummerSummer 670 Fall

Fall 1,455

al Average

Total Average

1,713 1,760 670 1,035 1,455 1,950

1,7370.04

0.04

Spring Spring 1,900

1,900 1,922

1,922 1,911

1,9110.04

0.0

853 0.02

0.02

1,360 1,137

1,137 1,248

1,2480.03

0.0

1,950 1,703

1,7030.04

0.04

SummerSummer1,360 Solstice Fall Solstice Fall 2,075

2,075 2,054

2,054 2,064

2,0640.05

0.0

1,431

1,4310.03

0.03

1,741

1,7410.04

0.0

1,760 1,737 1,035

853

Equninox Equninox Total Average

Total Average

39

Economic Benefits Heritage Museum Funding $5,000 $4,000 $3,000 $2,000 $1,000 $0 2009

2010 City of Starkville

2012

2015

Oktibbeha County

Heritage Museum Funding grants from both the City of Starkville and Oktibbeha County since 2009.

F RI E NDS OF T HE MUS E UM: F I NANCI AL RE P ORT Membership

Denim & Diamonds Fundraiser

Contributions

Net Income

16000 14000 12000 10000 8000 6000 4000 2000 0 2012

40

2013

2014

2015

Financial records were provided by both the Friends of the Museum and The Heritage Museum Board.

Membership fees, contributions, fundraisers, and annual net income data were provided by the Friends of the Museum for the years 2012-2015. Grants from the City of Starkville and Oktibbeha County obtained by the Heritage Museum Board between 2009-2015 were also made available. Inquiries were made to the neighboring apartment complex to see if renovations or rent increases had been made since the addition of the Heritage Museum design. It is possible that the design installation raised property values in surrounding areas, but after talking with the owner of Fellowship Place Apartments, no such changes have been made as a result of the construction. Across Russell Street, however, a large apartment complex is currently being erected and, though we did not talk with the developers, it is possible that unit pricing could have been influenced by proximity to the Heritage Museum.

Social Benefits

Visitor counts for the years of 2010-2015 were made from log books containing signatures from each visitor to the museum. Outdoor, catered, and nighttime events became possible as a result of the design installation. Outdoor fundraisers, such as Denim & Diamonds, were improved since 2012 and others, such as movie nights, informal live music sessions, and the Beaux Arts Ball, were created as a result of the new exterior. The Starkville Arts Council Garden tour and the garden club visits further bring groups to the museum. Additionally, new ADA-accessible restrooms were constructed on site to meet the needs of handicapped visitors. No change had been observed in Cub Scout troop visits, a limitation noted by museum staff to be due to the lack of a permanent program director to record the data.

Educational Benefits No new groups of primary or secondary school students have visited the museum. The only student groups that continue to visit the site are those from Mississippi State University, comprised of Landscape Architecture, Architecture, and Home Economics students. Student groups visit the museum multiple times each year since the design installation in 2012.

Activities Anticipated Projects / events for 2015 / 2016 Renovation of the Museum's restroom bringing it into compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act June 1, 2015 began fellowship in Landscap design and garden maintainance for an MSU graduate student With assistance from the MSU College of Architecture students, construction of an on-site storage building Exhibit of the wood carvings of Starkville native and retired military officer, Gerald Richardson Movie nights at the museum during warm weather months Upgrade exhibits and exterior improvements as needed

Annual Visitor Counts 1400 1185

No. of Visitors

1200 1000

1068

1054

998

905

800 600

Photos by Cory Gallo

References

660

"National Tree Benefit Calculator." National Tree Benefit Calculator. Casey Trees, Davey Tree Expert Co., n.d. Web. 29 Jan. 2016.

400 200 0 2010

2011

2012

2013 Year

Annual visitor counts from 2010 to 2015.

Data from Jan.-May 2010 was missing.

2014

2015

USDA - NRCS. Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds: TR55. Rep. Washington, D.C.: USDA, 1986. Print.

Soil Survey Staff, Natural Resources Conservation Service, United States Department of Agriculture. Web Soil Survey.

Available online at http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/.

Accessed [January/29/2016].

"Oktibbeha County Heritage Museum in Starkville, MS." Heritage Museum Events. Oktibbeha County Heritage Museum, 2016. Web. 29 Jan. 2016.

41

Photo by Megan Bean

42

THE FIELD

ASLA Professional Practice Networks' Blog https://thefield.asla.org/2016/04/21/landscape-performance-at-mississippi-heritage-museum/#more-5304

43

44

Google Earth

ASLA, MS. Chapter Merit Award

Disconnect to Connect: A Watershed Experience

05

Alcorn State University 2015

Team Members: Ying Qin (Design) Michael Keating (Design) Edith L. Martinez-Guerra (Civil Engineering) Anas Bdour,(Lumion/short film) A site demonstration project was designed for Alcorn State University, a HBCU located in Lorman, MS. The campus quad is at the heart of campus and hosts many activities throughout the year in addition to being a main connection for the majority of campus life. Given its prominence at the university, we chose to develop a multi-phased watershed demonstration design that both celebrates and educates visitors about the importance of stormwater management and water security.

45

The Site Condition Circulation

Vehicle Circulation

Pedestrian Circulation Potential Pedestrian Connection

Hydrology

Rainwater Flow

Collectors

Existing Pipes

Storm Junction Box

Primary Drain

Slope 10 20

30

60

Master Plan

46

Slopes: 7-10%

Slopes: 1-2%

Slopes: 2-4%

Slopes: 5-7%

Slopes: 4-6%

Low Point

Soil infiltration test results: 1.5 in / hr Soil type: Silt Loam

Legend 01. "Riverine Retention System" 02. "Floodplain" Lawn Area 03. Lily Pad Overhead Rain Art 04. Central Plaza 05. "City Block" Pavers 06. Education Retention Cells 07. Water Pipe 08. Amphitheatre 09. Wave Field 10. Outdoor Eating Area

Green infrastructure is rapidly replacing concrete, metal, and plastic stormwater infrastructure around the country, providing an exciting way to make our world Greener. In our design, we will disconnect the watershed from the traditional stormwater pipe system to create an amenity at the center of campus that connects visitors with water and educates them about the importance of proper watershed management. We will expose the hidden movement of water and demonstrate the hidden pathways through which water is channelled during strong rain events. Water is a necessary element for life and we want to bring it into the open to celebrate and educate about its importance for ecosystems and human health and safety.

Due to the proximity to the Mississippi River (3 miles), we have designed a water demonstration plaza in the heart of Alcorn State Universityâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s campus that draws on the historical, cultural, and physical connections with The River. Words in the landscape inspire people to be part of the solution to water quantity and quality problems in our watersheds, while fun water art brings people into contact with rainwater that engages multiple senses. Significant carbon storage from perennial wetland plants and trees helps to reduce the effects of climate change, while providing clean air to breathe and naturally-shaded spaces for relaxation.The "Disconnect To Connect" design will inspire all visitors to view water in a completely different way and to demonstrate that, in a world that is becoming more inter-connected, we all live downstream.

47

Site Section Site Improvements

The stormwater pipe connecting the dining hall roof to the main pipe system was disconnected and re-routed to bring water to the surface. This stormwater exposition creates an amenity that also allows for water retention and purification through the Riverine Retention System.

Existing stormwater pipe from building re-routed to bioretention area

The pie charts show the change in land-use from Existing to Proposed conditions on the 13.2 acre site. Planting 30 trees increases tree canopy and carbon storage, while the paving design increases impervious area. The addition of a 2% Bioretention area (0.23 acres) is all that is needed to handle >95% of average annual rainfall on-site.

48

Existing Site Condition

Proposed Site Condition

A section elevation cut through the site from north to south illustrates the plaza space with lily pad rain features as well as the plant material in the Riverine Retention System.

Stormwater from the parking lot and dining hall roof will emerge from the pipe and flow into a series of retention cells. Each cell incorporates words into the weir construction to educate the public about the hydrologic processes occurring in the Riverine Retention System.

49

Section Diagram

Monarch Butterfly http://weknowyourdreams.com/ images/butterfly/butterfly-04.jpg

Honey Bee

http://www.almanac.com/sites/ default/files/images/honeybee.jpg

Hummingbird

http://www.usurnsonline.com/ wp-content/uploads/2011/04/ hummingbird.jpg

Joe-pye Weed

50

Pickerelweed

Plants pictures from:www.onlineplantfinder.com

Swamp Lantern

Delta Star

Soil Infiltration & Modeling Results In order to measure the soil hydraulic conductivity of the soils at the Alcorn State University site, a Mini Disk Infiltrometer (Decagon Devices, Inc.) test was performed on the Memphis Silt Loam soil (r=2.25 cm/s; suction: -5 cm/s) . The cumulative infiltration rate was calculated from the incremental results for the soil regression (R2 = 0.9972). According to the report and from the infiltration test performed on site, the soil type is Memphis Silt Loam, hydrologic soil group B with an infiltration rate of 1.5 in/hr.

To determine the proper sizing for the bioretention zone in the Riverine Retention System, hydrologic analysis using the Santa Barbara Urban Hydrograph (SBUH) found the optimal area and depth, which informed design considerations. The modeling results found that an 8 in. depth was optimal for water retention as well as cost/feasabiity constraints (Table 1). The Bioretention area needed to manage the 95th percentile (2.25 in) at depth of 8 in. was 8,444 ft2. The bioretention area in our design is 10,000 ft2, thus allowing for retention of >95th percentile of average annual rainfall. Hydrologic modeling explored the efficacy of larger bioretention area depths and found minimal retention increases with 10, 12, and 14 in. depths.

As part of our Low Impact Development (LID) design, Best Management Practices (BMPs), including infiltration basins and portions of permeable pavement, will be used to mitigate stormwater runoff by storing it on-site. Water-tolerant vegetation will act to filter out pollutants, stabilize the soil, and provide wildlife habitat that enriches the experience for all visitors.

51

Hydrologic Modeling Peak flows compared across multiple conditions show the hydrologic effects of including the proposed retention basin in the design (Figure 1). With the addition of a bioretention basin, 100% of >95th percentile rain events will be infiltrated with no runoff leaving the site.

Precipitation data were gathered from the nearest NOAA rain gauge located in Natchez, MS (Station ID 22-6177). This report describes the calculations and the assumptions made for 2.25 inches of rain (95th percentile) for a 24-hr storm event. To assess the difference from pre-existing to th post-development conditions, we used the Figure 1. Hydrograph of the modeled conditions for the 95 Santa Barbara Urban Hydrograph method percentile rain event. The yellow line demonstrates 100% infiltration for the managed condition. for modelling projected changes (Table 2).

For the pre-existing condition, it was assumed that the pervious area was mainly grass cover (>75%) in good condition for a Curve Number (CN) of 61. The CN was used to calculate the potential maximum retention after runoff, S=6.39 inches, to ensure the initial abstraction (I a=1.22 in) was less than the precipitation (P= 2.25 in). The flow in the watershed is sheet flow; the sheet flow equation was used to calculate water travel which gives the required time of concentration. Time of concentration is the time traveled by the rainfall (primarily sheet flow) from the most remote point in the watershed to the outlet. The â&#x20AC;&#x153;nâ&#x20AC;? value or roughness Manningâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s coefficient used was 0.24 for grass. The same method was used to model hydrologic variables for developed conditions and post-development conditions (the design proposal). A summary of the maximum retention after runoff (S) is shown below (Table 3) as well as a summary of differences across pre-existing and post-developed conditions for multiple hydrologic variables.

Table 2.

Summary of land use cover and maximum retention values for multiple site conditions

Table 3.

Comparison of Time of Concentration under multiple site conditions.

52

Materials / Plants

http://www.hellerconcreteinc.com/images/ PerviousGolfClub_051.jpg

http://lake-gaston.renewcrewclean.com/decksand-docks/

https://www.permathene.co

Photo by: Beth Wynn

Pervious Concrete

Pressure-treated Wood

Gabion Seating

Block Art Letters

Materials were selected based on the sustainable principles of perviousness, locally purchasable, low maintenance, and potential to be recycled.

Wetland Plants Trees

Baldcypress tree Grasses

American Beautyberry (Callicarpa americana)

Baldcypress Tree

(Taxodium distichum)

Pickerelweed Joe-pye weed Swamp lantern Delta star Common spikerush Broomsedge Torpedo grass Delta arrowhead Red okra Shrubs

Button Bush

(Cephalanthus occidentalis)

Buttonbush Sweet fern American beautyberry Foxtail fern Royal fern Upland Trees

Sugar maple Flowering dogwood

Taxodium distichum

Pontederia cordata Eupatorium fistulosum Lysichitum spp.

Louisiana Iris Eleocharis palustris Andropogon virginicus Panicum repens Saggitaria graminae A. esculentus C. occidentalis Comptonia peregrina Callicarpa americana Asparagus densiflorus Osmunda regalis Acer saccharinum Cornus florida

Sugar Maple

(Acer saccharinum)

Flowering Dogwood

(Callicarpa Americana)

Plants pictures from:www.onlineplantfinder.com

53

Phase Sequence / Cost Estimate Phase 1 Cost Estimate Details Name

Materials

Amount

$ per unit

Walkways

Concrete

3,601 sf

$7/sf

$25,207

Bioretention

Soil + Plants

10,000 sf

$3/sf

$30,000

Trees

Bald Cypress

4

$250 each

$1,000

Pipe Disconnection Earthwork Retention Cell Weirs

Wood Decking

N/A

N/A

Cost

N/A

$5,000

Stone

141 sf

$20/sf

$2,820

PT Wood

249 sf

$8/sf

$1,992

Total Cost: $65,812

Phase 1: Main walkway and Bioretention Area ("Riverine Retention System")

Phase 2: Other walkways, Plaza area, Lily pads rain art, Seating area, and remaining trees

Climate Change This design proposal has several aspects which mitigate the projected effects of climate change, such as higher frequency of drought and higher temperatures. Water- and drought-tolerant wetland perennial grasses will survive under extreme conditions and provide important carbon dioxide storage. Tree plantings on site (30 total) will absorb a maximum of 1,440 pounds of carbon dioxide per year (48 lbs/tree) once reaching maturity. It is expected that maximum carbon dioxide sequestration will happen four years after the planting of the trees; however, at least a third of the maximum sequestration can be achieved during the first year. Trees also cast shade which cools the air for visitors and provide cleaner air to breathe by releasing oxygen as a byproduct of photosynthesis.

Maintenance

Spring

Lawn Site Cleaning Plant Grasses Fertilize & Mow Bioretention Plant Installation Trimming/Weeding Plant Replacement Trash / Debris Removal Woody & Nonwoody Vegetation Shrub/Tree Planting & Bracing Mulching Irrigation Trimming/Weeding Fertillize

Phase 3: Wave field and outdoor eating area

54

Summer

Fall

Design Video Link

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6nzjAPW2GT8&feature=youtu.be

55

56

Google Earth

06

Construction Details

57

2"*6"P.T.DECK BOARDS, FASTENED WITH(2)2 1/2 " #10 GAVL.DECK SCREWS PER BOARD AND STRINGER CROSSING

FOOTING

9 1/2"

101'-7 7/8"

+364.75

+364.75

+364.51

+364.51

8'-0"

6'-4 7/8"

+364.75

9 1/2"

+364.51

2'-9 7/8"

1

12'-0"

12'-0"

12'-0"

12'-0"

SITE PLAN

+364.75

2"*6" IPE DECKING (Angle-Cut Herringbone)

+364.75

2"*6"P.T.DEC FASTENED W #10 GAVL.DE SCREWS PE BOARD AND CROSSING

8'-0"

2"*10"P.T.BLO TYP.SECURE W/(3)20D GA NAIL EACH E (TOENAILING BE REJECTE

2"*10" P.T. JO

+364.51

58

2

SITE PLAN DETAIL

+364.51

3

PLA

SHEET PREPARED F

LA2544

2 L2

SHEET PREPARED B

YING Q

+364.75

+364.75

1 L2

+364.51

12'-0"

12'-0"

12'-0"

12'-0"

2'-10"

WOOD BOAR

NO.

2'-9 7/8"

12'-0"

4"

6"*6" P.T. POST,TYP.

3/8 " GAL.STEEL EDGING.SEE DETAIL

1'-7"

CK BOARDS, WITH(2)2 1/2 " ECK ER D STRINGER

2'-0"

2"*10" P.T. BEAMS ATTACHED TO 6"*6" POST (EACH SIDE)

2'-0"

6'-6"

8'-0"

7'-4"

OCKING, E ALV. END G WILL ED)

+364.51

4"

1'-7"

OIST.TYP.

2"*10"P.T.BLOCKING,TYP.SECURE W/(3)20D GALV.NAIL EACH END (TOENAILING WILL BE REJECTED)

SIMPON FACE MOUNT HANGERS MODEL #LUS26SS.TYP. OR APPROVED. EQUIVALENT(INSTALL PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMEN DATIONS)

REVISIONS

DESCRIPTION

PROJECT NO: DATUM: SURVEY: HORIZ SCALE: scale here VERT SCALE: DESIGN: DRAWN: CHECKED: APPROVED: 20/10/2014 DATE: SHEET TITLE

SHEET T

AN-WOOD BOARDWALK

L1

59

1

10" 2"4"

4"

4 L2

1'-8"

6"AGGREGATE COMPACTED SUBGRADE

SIMPON FACE MOUNT HANGERS MODEL #LUS26SS.TYP. OR APPROVED. EQUIVALENT (INSTALL PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMEN DATIONS)

4"*4"P.T.CURB ATTACHED EVERY 5'O.C. W / (2)1/2 " DIA. GALV. CARRIAGE BOLTS (W/BUTTON HEAD) W / WASHERS & LOCK NUTS. TYP. COUNTERSINK HEAD FLUSH WITH CURB,TYP.

6"CONCERET PAVEMENT

section1

4"*4"P.T.CURB ATTACHED EVERY 5'O.C. W / (2)1/2 " DIA. GALV. CARRIAGE BOLTS (W/BUTTON HEAD) W / WASHERS & LOCK NUTS. TYP. COUNTERSINK HEAD FLUSH WITH CURB,TYP.

4"

2"

SIMPON FACE MOUNT HANGERS MODEL #LUS26SS.TYP. OR APPROVED. EQUIVALENT (INSTALL PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMEN DATIONS)

10"

1'-8"

8"

2"*6"P.T.DECK BOARDS, FASTENED WITH(2)2 1/2 " #10 GAVL.DECK SCREWS PER BOARD AND STRINGER CROSSING

GALVANIZED POST ANCHOR

6"*6" P.T. POST,TYP.

(2)5/8 " DIA. GALV. CARRIAGE BOLTS (W/BUTTON HEAD) W / WASHERS & LOCK NUTS.TYP.

8"

10"

1'-10"

1'-0"

COMPACTED SUB-GRADE TO 95%STD. 3 1/2" * 3 1/2" EMB. GALV.SIMPSON PROCTOR,TYP. "STRONG-BOLTS" ANCHOR,TYP

1'-0"

2 60

SECTION 2

2"*10" P.T. JOIS

6"*6" P.T. POST,TYP. 2"*10" P.T. JOIST.TYP. 2"*10" P.T. BEAMS ATTACHED TO 6"*6" POST (EACH SIDE)

2"*6"P.T.DECK BOARDS, FASTENED WITH (2)2 1/2 " #10 GAVL.DECK SCREWS

2"*10" P.T.RIM. JOIST.TYP.

2"*10" P.T. JOIST.TYP. JOIST HANGER CONNECTION TO CONCRETE

JOIST HANGER CONNECTION TO CONCRETE

SHEET PREPARED FOR:

LA2544

6"CONCERET PAVEMENT

3

6"AGGREGATE

L2

SHEET PREPARED BY: COMPACTED SUBGRADE

YING QIN

4

CONCRETE CONNECTION DETAIL

ST.TYP.

2"*10" P.T. JOIST.TYP.

2"*10" P.T.RIM. JOIST.TYP.

6"*6" P.T. POST,TYP. SIMPON FACE MOUNT HANGERS MODEL #LUS26SS.TYP. OR APPROVED. EQUIVALENT (INSTALL PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMEN DATIONS)

3/8 "STEEL EDGING

WOOD BOARDWAIK

VARIES

2"*10" P.T. BEAMS ATTACHED TO 6"*6" POST (EACH SIDE)

7 1/2" 8"

CONCERET FOOTING

GALVANIZED BOLT/ NUT/WASHER

10"

(2) HORIZONTAL REINFORCING BARS

1'-0"

DA

GALVANIZED POST ANCHOR

(2-4) L REINFORCING BARS

3000 PSI CONC. FOOTING REINE. W /(2)#4 E.W.

REVISIONS

DESCRIPTION

8"

3 1/2"

1'-0"

3"

NO.

COMPACTED SUB-GRADE TO 95%STD. PROCTOR,TYP.

PROJECT NO: DATUM: SURVEY: HORIZ SCALE: scale here VERT SCALE: DESIGN: DRAWN: CHECKED: APPROVED: 20/10/2014 DATE: SHEET TITLE

SHEET TITLE

3

FOOTING DETAIL

L2

61

CONCCRETE STAIRS

RED BRICK(7.625"*3.625"*2.25") SET WITH 0.4" MORTAR JOINTS

C:\Users\asus\Desktop\IMG_0734.JPG 7 5/8"

.JPG

1'-0"

11"

1'-10"

11"

7 5/8"

1

SEATWALL PLAN

2

PLANTING MIX AS SPECIFIED BROOM FINISH STEPSSOIL 3500 PSI, AIR-ENTRAINED CONCRETE 2"

5"*2.25"

RED BRICK(SHINER) 7.625"*3.625"*2.25" SET WITH 0.4" MORTAR JOINTS

SLOPE 3/4 " BULL NOSE

4"CONCRETE PAVEMENT. REINE.AS REQUIRED 6"

5/8"

4"

1'-0"

COMPACTED SUBGRADE

STAIRS DETAIL

4 SEATWALL DETAIL 62 White Brick

4" 4"

COMPACTED SUBGRADE

4"AGGREGATE BASE 4"COMPACTED

White Brick Stairs

2 1/8"

1'-0"

11 3/4"

4"

C:\Users\asus\Des AGGREGATE

1'-0"

2'-10 5/8"

1'-0"

12"*12" CONT. CRUSHED STONE

3

2'-0 3/8"

/4

R3

#4 REBAR,AT.15" O.C. EACH.WAY.2"CLEAR

4"DIA.PERFORATED PIPE CONNECT TO DRAINAGE SYSTEM OR OUTFALL

6"

11"

CONCRETE FOOTING REINT 12" MIN

RED BRICK(STRETCHER) 7.625"*3.625"*2.25" SET WITH 0.4" MORTAR JOINTS " 6"

4"

#4 REBAR,AT.15" O.C.EACH.WAY.2"CLEAR

SET WITH 0.4" MORTAR JOINTS STAIRS 7 CONCCRETE 5/8"

RED BRICK(7.625"*3.625"*2.25") SET WITH 0.4" MORTAR JOINTS

CONCCRETE

RED BRICK(SHINER) 7.625"*3.625"*2.25" SET WITH 0.4" MORTAR JOINTS

7 5/8" STAIRS

25"*2.25") AR JOINTS

11" 11" 1'-10"

1

6"

1

SEATWALL PLAN SEATWALL ELEVATION SEATWALL PLAN 2 1

6"

6"

1'-0"

1'-0"

RED BRICK(STRETCHER) 7.625"*3.625"*2.25" SET WITH 0.4" MORTAR JOINTS

3

1'-0 3/8"

1

7 5/8" 7 5/8"

9 3/8"

1'-0"

6"

2'-0"

11"

4

CLA

LA2

6"

1'-10"

SHEET PREPARE

11"

6"

SHEET PREPARE

YING

22

BROOM FINISH STEPS 3500 PSI, BROOM FINISHCONCRETE STEPS 3500 PSI, AIR-ENTRAINED AIR-ENTRAINED CONCRETE

"

3/4 " BULL NOSE

LEAR

3/4 " BULL NOSE

6" 6"

4"

11" 11"

/44" " RR33/

4" 4"

1'-0"

1'-0"

11 3/4"

11 3/4"

C:\Users\asus\Desk C:\Users\asus\Des COMPACTED SUBGRADE COMPACTED SUBGRADE

4"

4"

ACTED GATE

6"

5/8" 5/8"

CTED SUBGRADE

4"COMPACTED 4"COMPACTED AGGREGATE AGGREGATE

1'-0"

1'-0"

1'-0"

STAIRSDETAIL DETAIL STAIRS 4

1 1/2"

White Brick Stairs (0.5"Mortar Setting Bed)

3/4" Fibrous Expansion Joint, Filler 6"*12"Morable Steel Dowell Between Concrete Slabs

REVISI

DESCRIPTIO

1'-0"

1/2" Overhand MAX.TYP. #2 Nosing Rebar 2" Clear all Sides 11"

6"

4

NO.

4 1/2"

1'-0"

1'-0"

asus\Desktop\vintage-2.jpg

SEATWALL/RE DET

1/4" Wash PER ft

4 1/2"

4"

#4#4REBAR,AT.15" O.C.EACH.WAY.2"CLEAR REBAR,AT.15" O.C.EACH.WAY.2"CLEAR

6" 6"

PG

RED BRICK(ROWLOCK) 7.625"*3.625"*2.25" SET WITH 0.4" MORTAR JOINTS

7 5/8"

G

CONCCRETE WITH CRUSHED STONE

PROJECT NO: DATUM: SURVEY: 63scale h HORIZ SCALE: VERT SCALE:

(510) 590 7856 yingqin23@gmail.com

64