American University in Cairo Architectural Engineering Programme Ayman El-Ghazzawi
BSc MSc FRICS
11 October 2016
Š ValueMetric Consultants LLC (2016)
Introduction
– terminology
Benchmarking Cost
Planning
Building Economics Conclusion Q&A © ValueMetric Consultants LLC (2016)
2
Introduction
3
Cost
is a significant, if not essential part of a project decides if the scheme is viable….. No Money No Project QS is responsible for all matters financial and commercial on a construction project Quantity Triangle of Duties on a Project: Surveyor
Architect (Designer)
COST QUALITY
© ValueMetric Consultants LLC (2016)
TIME
Project Manager
4
US Approach to Cost Management
UK Approach to Cost Management
Traditionally called a “Cost Estimator”
Previously called a Quantity Surveyor, now more common to call Cost Manager
Approach is led by Programme
Led by Design Stages (e.g. RIBA)
Use of cost-loaded programmes
Use of Bills of Quantities to package works
Method of Measurement: CSI Masterformat
Method of Measurement: POMI, NRM
Professional association: AACE
Professional association: RICS
Combine Cost & Time Project Controls
Separate Cost & Time: QS and PM
© ValueMetric Consultants LLC (2016)
5
Provides
an early, approximate vision of construction costs Helps in setting a project’s budget Used to commercially manage the pre-contract design Concept Schematic Detailed Design Provides an early warning of scope creep, monitors changes Can assist with setting sale prices Informs the financial P&L of a developer company Captures entire development costs helps form package BOQs © ValueMetric Consultants LLC (2016)
6
Term
Definition
Cost
actual price to be paid
Value
how much it is desired, price of what it’s worth
Feasibility Estimate
Establishes the overall viability of the project, return on investment
Order of Magnitude Estimate
Reflects a particular design stage, e.g. concept, schematic, detailed
Cost Plan
Reflects a particular design stage, e.g. concept, schematic, detailed
Š ValueMetric Consultants LLC (2016)
7
Term Cost Model
Cost Analysis Cost Report
Š ValueMetric Consultants LLC (2016)
Definition Cost-led, does not reflect a particular design, allows for varying elements Estimates the cost of construction of particular elements or portion of the works Tracks the overall project costs monthly, monitors commercial performance
8
Benchmarking and Order of Cost Estimates (OCE)
9
Highest
level of cost estimating, lowest accuracy Usually based on functional units or built-up area Examples of functional units: › Hospitals › Hotels
› Schools › Residential › Office Buildings
© ValueMetric Consultants LLC (2016)
EGP / EGP / EGP / EGP / EGP /
bed key student m2 (or per habitable room) gross lettable area
10
OCE: Must
Order of Cost Estimate – most preliminary cost plan find out:
› Type of building to be built (e.g. hotel)
› Expected number of functional units (e.g. nr of keys) › When it is expected to be built (e.g. two years from now) › Outline specification level (e.g. high/med/low quality, 4*, 5*)
› Location where it is to be built © ValueMetric Consultants LLC (2016)
11
Source: Spon’s Architects’ and Builders’ Price Book 2009 © ValueMetric Consultants LLC (2016)
12
Begin
with a high level benchmark estimate by function Adjust your estimate by: › Geographical variation › Inflation indices Multiply
by number of functional units Add contingency, VAT, etc. Emphasise that Tolerance / accuracy is low Use an estimating resource – your own project database or price book © ValueMetric Consultants LLC (2016)
13
Source: Spon’s Architects’ and Builders’ Price Book (2009) © ValueMetric Consultants LLC (2016)
14
Š ValueMetric Consultants LLC (2016)
15
Š ValueMetric Consultants LLC (2016)
16
Š ValueMetric Consultants LLC (2016)
17
Cost Planning
18
A
document that details costs, usually developed from a preliminary benchmark estimate, based on elemental or functional units that reflects the Design Team’s intentions
Follows the
project’s design stages, e.g. RIBA Work Stages
Sets
a plan to spend costs, helps with purchasing and cost control
As
cost plan develops, accuracy is improved:
LE/function LE/m2 Detailed LE costs based on qtys © ValueMetric Consultants LLC (2016)
19
RIBA Work Work Stage Description Stage A
Appraisal / Feasibility
B
Strategic Briefing
C
Outline Proposals
D
Detailed Proposals
E
Final Proposals
F
Production Information
G
Tender Documentation
H
Tender Action
J
Mobilisation
K
Construction ďƒ Practical Completion
L
After Practical Completion
Š ValueMetric Consultants LLC (2016)
20
COST PLANNING STAGES SET BUDGET
Concept 30%
Schematic 60%
Detailed 90%
COST PLAN
COST PLAN
COST PLAN
Confirm Budget, Cost Limits
Set Cost Targets on Schematic
Set Cost Targets on Detailed
Proceed to Tender BOQ
Pro-active Change Control
Remedial Action: Value Engineering © ValueMetric Consultants LLC (2016)
21
Similar
to OCE, but on an elemental level Uses previous projects from a database, or pricing book such as Spons Adjust elements to suit the project being priced › E.g. EGP/m2 will differ whether it is steel or concrete frame Ensure
it is a like-for-like benchmark comparison:
› Use same area types (BUA, NIA, etc.)
› Exclude sub-structure, earth work, external works › Preliminaries (indirect costs), taxes and the like © ValueMetric Consultants LLC (2016)
22
OCE
or preliminary cost plan
± 25% to 30% tolerance
› EGP / functional unit Concept
Cost Plan
± 15% to 25% tolerance
› EGP / m2, based on floor areas Schematic
Cost Plan
± 10% to 15% tolerance
› EGP / m2, based on floor areas, with some systems allowed for based on evolving design (e.g. district cooling v split units) Detailed
Cost Plan
± 5% to 10% tolerance
› EGP / m2, based on quantities and unit rates © ValueMetric Consultants LLC (2016)
23
Š ValueMetric Consultants LLC (2016)
24
7,000
EGP/m2 6,000
5,000
4,000
3,000
2,000
1,000
0
Š ValueMetric Consultants LLC (2016)
Electrical Engineering Works Mechanical Engineering Works Conveying Systems Special Construction Furnishings Equipment Specialties Finishes Doors and Windows Thermal and Moisture Protection Wood and Plastics Metal Works Masonry Concrete Works Site Construction General Requirements 25
Building Economics
26
© ValueMetric Consultants LLC (2016)
27
For the following two projects, A and B, calculate: 1.
Floor Area
2.
Perimeter length
3.
Wall Area
4.
Wall-to-floor ratio
Š ValueMetric Consultants LLC (2016)
28
For the following two projects, A and B, calculate: 1.
Floor Area
2.
Perimeter length
3.
Wall Area
4.
Wall-to-floor ratio
Š ValueMetric Consultants LLC (2016)
29
Efficiency comes
form plan shapes that are square (or circle)
Consider whether it
is better internal division (e.g. triangular plan)
Less efficient shapes require Consider a Core and Short
more structure
better enclosing wall to area ratio
circulation affected by choice of plan shape
assessment
© ValueMetric Consultants LLC (2016)
30
For the following three Plan Shapes A, B and C, calculate: 1. Floor Area
3. Wall Area
2. Perimeter length
4. Wall-to-floor ratio
Š ValueMetric Consultants LLC (2016)
31
For the following three Plan Shapes A, B and C, calculate: 1. Floor Area
3. Wall Area
2. Perimeter length
4. Wall-to-floor ratio
Š ValueMetric Consultants LLC (2016)
32
© ValueMetric Consultants LLC (2016)
33
© ValueMetric Consultants LLC (2016)
34
Tall structures are more costly – step changes in height mean it is not a uniform relationship of height to cost
Storey heights can be cost sensitive
VT costs to be considered
More engineering costs for FP, services performance
Wider and more circulation space needed
Temporary works, lifting, etc. more expensive
Wind load will affect structural design
© ValueMetric Consultants LLC (2016)
35
Building arrangement affects the cost of construction
Consider: › Sharing elements between buildings › Cost and of constructing › Ability to construct: Buildability
For the four arrangements shown, 1.
Which is most desirable?
2.
Which is most efficient?
3.
Which has least “buildability”?
© ValueMetric Consultants LLC (2016)
36
Conclusion
37
Benchmarking
is important to compare projects
› Expect differences and variation – explain them › Separate abnormals (sub-structure, external works, infra, etc.) Cost
Plans are approximate, and not accurate by nature Accuracy improves as design develops (± % tolerance reduces) Building shape, size and arrangement all affect costs understand how these affect your cost plan Look at other efficiency parameters (net : gross area) © ValueMetric Consultants LLC (2016)
38