Chao Jiang
Architecture and 3D printing Protfolio .
Chao Jiang č’‹čś… 507, 2 silicon way, N1 6FH,London, United Kingdom +44 (0)7598493385 1026529978@qq.com corner_glasses
C
hao Jiang (China,1992) completed Environmental Design at Soochow University, China. During the period he focused on the relationship between the environment
and the Architecture.He also won the Asia Architecture And Urbanism Alliance Architectural design best creative award.He served as an interior designer in the famous company GOLD MANTIS. Recently he finished the MArch Architectural Design at the Bartlett School of Architecture(UCL). During this period he is committed to developing 3D printing at the architectural scale. He further studied the combination of 3d printing and other materials so as to increase the efficiency of printing and reduce the cost as well.
EDUCATION 2016-2017
2011-2015
The Bartlett School of Architecture (UCL) March Architectural Design, Research Cluster 4 London, UK Soochow University B.A. Environmental Design Soochow, China
PROFESSIONAL 2013
Intern at in Jiangyin Huaxia architectural design company as a design assistant
2015
Intern at in Suzhou Gold Mantis Construction company as a interior designer
HONORS AND AWARDS
PROFESSIONAL SKILLS
Gold medal in a device design competition named Micro-Why which was organized by CIID (China Institute of Interior Design)
Graduated in Architectural Design,specialized in Graphic Design and Environmental Design
2012-2013
Special Scholarship for Excellent Innovation
Modeling and Drawing Rhinoceros Advanced AutoCAD Intermediate Grasshopper Intermediate Unity Basics 3D Max Basics
12. 2012
Third Prize of the 13th Challenge Cup Kedi Petrochemical of College Students of Extra-curricular Academic Competition Works
Scripting/Coding C# in Unity/Grasshopper Basics Processing Learning
01. 2014
Third Prize of the 13th Challenge Cup College Students of Extra-curricular Academic Competition Works
Robotic and Engineering Robotstudio intermediate Arduino Basics building filament extruder Operating robot arm
05. 2014
Excellent Award for first Yanlord Property•Tang Villa Gardens Design Competition
06. 2014
Top Ten Works Prize for 2014 Modern•New Cup of national university students Interior Design Competition held by CIID
2012
09. 2015
Asia Architecture And Urbanism Alliance Architectural design best creative award
2016
IELTS-IELTS academic module Level-C1
PULICATIONS 2013.08.19
The Inheritance and Development of Folk Arts and Crafts in Suzhou - Published in the 18th issue to Art and Literature for the Masses as First Author
Editing/Graphic Photoshop Advanced Illustrator Advanced InDesign Advanced After Effects Intermediate Rendering Keyshot Advanced Lumion Advanced Thea Render Advanced Languages Chinese English Japanese Basics
01 INTRODUCTION
3D printing at architectural scale
D
uring the last few years, Additive Manufacturing technologies have
We(INTILE) aims to achieve large scale 3D printing where both the fabri-
been applied on an architectural scale. Large Scale 3D printing is nor-
cation and the design method directly work together and develop at the
mally associated with the engineer Behrokh Khoshnevis’ who created the
same time.
Contour Crafting method. This method is based on the continuous deposition of material layer by layer; the material used is concrete. However,
According to Branko Kolarevic, the ability of Additive Manufacturing to pro-
there is another approach to introduce AM on a large architectural scale,
duce customized pieces without any extra cost has delivered the concept
3D printing canal house in Amsterdam.
of mass-customization instead of mass-production. Peter Zellner (1999) argues that this would lead to, “series-manufactured, mathematically co-
The first approach to 3D Spatial printing was carried out by Gramazio and
herent but differentiated objects, as well as elaborate, precise and relatively
Kohler’s at the Future Cities Laboratory in Singapore where they introduced
cheap one-off components” (1999, 46), which implies that architecture is
the idea of spatial plastic extrusion and a robotic arm. This new technol-
becoming a “firmware”.
ogy allows for the reduction of the amount of material needed to create a structure. Additionally, this fabrication process is slightly faster than the
‘layer by layer’ method.
tion and innovation. There are very few projects that are being developed in
Nowadays, the 3D printing of houses is a field of experimenta-
this field and an understanding of the research would be useful in order to The main constraints of this research are that it is mainly focused on the
analyse them in a briefly way.
fabrication process and the design process is not taken into consideration. On the other hand, the research undertaken at the ETH by Benjamin Dillengurger and Michael Hansmeyer is mainly focused on the design and not on the fabrication.
Contour Crafting by Behrokh
3D printing canal house by DUS architects
02 FABRICATION
2nd generation tool_spatial Printing
Filament Extruder Design and Testing no pressure
medium pressure
right pressure
The compressor pressure is not enough, no straight lines
The compressor pressure is appropiate, straight lines
Toolpath behaviour Without cooling system the lines cannot cool down enoguh quick
W
e are testing different parameters of the cooling system such as pressure, distance to nozzle and orientation. The main idea is to find the right combination between them to achieve the highest performances in the toolpath
development.
5
6
1 3
8
7 2
9
4
10
Final Filament Extruder Dismantling(3mm) Connection •
robot (1)
T
Cooling system •
support (2)
•
stepper motor (6)
•
pipe to disperse (3)
•
gear (7)
•
cooler to nozzle (4)
•
extruder support (8)
•
pneumatic valve (5)
•
all metal hot end (9)
•
aluminium nozzle (10)
o implement the Space Frame, this research develped an apropiate cooling method and also a wa wide diameter (3mm)
extruding nozzle, and proposed a 3D prinnting method that etxtruded plastica in mid air.
Extrusion system
- 3mm extrusion
02 FABRICATION
10.00 3.00 3.00
rod • weight _ 415gr • hight _ 70mm • diameter_ 40mm • material_aluminium
nozzle 1 • weight _ 144gr • hight _ 70mm • diameter_ 36mm • material_aluminium
nozzle 2 • weight _ 179gr • hight _ 80mm • diameter_ 50mm • material_aluminium
nozzle 3 • weight _ 406gr • hight _ 80mm • diameter_ 36mm • material_steel
0° .7 75
2.50
75
2.50 2.50
.7 0°
0° .7
3.00
75
3.00 3.00
6.00
10.00
20.00
22.00
10.00
6.00
51.00
22.00 20.00 51.00
20.0010.00
22.00 51.00
30.00
50.00
0°
30.00 30.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00
80
.0
0°
80
.0
0° .0 80
6.00
10.00
10.00
20.00
50.00
30.00
30.00
30.00
30.0020.00
50.00
30.00 30.00 6.00 6.00 10.00 10.00 6.006.00 6.00
10.00
6.00
20.0010.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
11.75 20.00
25.00
25.00 20.00 40.00
37.00
10.00 10.00 6.00 6.00
40.00
25.00 40.00
69 .15 °
69 .15 ° 69 .15 °
37.00 37.00
10.00
6.00 6.00
6.00
10.00
10.00
20.0010.00
37.00
10.00 10.00 6.00 6.00
11.75
11.75
11.75 20.00
37.00 37.00
42.00
25.00
10.00
20.00 10.00
25.00
25.00 20.00
42.00
42.00
6.00 6.00
10.00
11.75
11.75
02. nozzle design and testing
3.00
nozzle 4 • weight _ 75gr • hight _ 70mm • diameter_ 32mm • material_aluminium
nozzle 5 • weight _ 78gr • hight _ 60mm • diameter_ 36mm • material_aluminium
speed robot (mm/s) • supported segments • downward segments • upward and unsupported segments speed motor • high speed • medium speed • low speed displacement • vertical offset • rotation compensation • horizontal distance
speed robot (mm/s) • supported segments • downward segments • upward and unsupported segments
30 25 10
speed motor • high speed • medium speed • low speed
400 175 175 5 pi*-0.01 10
waiting time (s.) • after start extruding
3
speed robot (mm/s) • supported segments • downward segments • upward and unsupported segments
1
displacement • vertical offset • rotation compensation • horizontal distance waiting time (s.) • after start extruding
speed robot (mm/s) • supported segments • downward segments • upward and unsupported segments
30 15 15
30 25 15 400 150 125 5 pi*0.01 4
25 15 10
speed motor • high speed • medium speed • low speed
400 150 150
speed motor • high speed • medium speed • low speed
displacement • vertical offset • rotation compensation • horizontal distance
400 150 125
5 pi*0.01
displacement • vertical offset • rotation compensation • horizontal distance
5 pi*0.02
waiting time (s.) • after start extruding
4
speed robot (mm/s) • supported segments • downward segments • upward and unsupported segments speed motor • high speed • medium speed • low speed displacement • vertical offset • rotation compensation • horizontal distance waiting time (s.) • after start extruding
4
400 175 175 5 pi*-0.01 20 3
waiting time (s.) • after start extruding 4
speed robot (mm/s) • supported segments • downward segments • upward and unsupported segments
20 15 15
5
2
30 20 20
speed motor • high speed • medium speed • low speed
400 175 175
displacement • vertical offset • rotation compensation • horizontal distance
5 pi*0.02
waiting time (s.) • after start extruding
3
3
6
02 FABRICATION
03. printing process (with foam)
frame1
frame2
frame3
frame4
frame5
frame6
frame7
frame8
frame9
layer 1 • 3D printing
layer 2 • 3D printing • foam
layer 3 • 3D printing • foam
layer 4 • 3D printing • foam
layer 5 • foam
layer 6 • 3D printing
High Density Foam 3mm PLA filament Filament
03 Toothpath
Toothpath in the tiles
layer 05 toothpath
layer 04 toothpath/ foam/ empty voxles
layer 03 foam
layer 02 toothpath/ foam/ empty voxles
layer 01 foam
Tile test case 5
size: 564mm*160mm*160mm material:PLA filament (black)
Tile test case 5(long tile)
size: 1024mm*160mm*160mm material:PLA filament (black)
03 Toothpath
Toothpath in the tiles (testing process)
test 1
• weight _ 650gr. • printing time _ 4h. • cost _ 14 £
test 2
• weight _ 750gr. • printing time _ 5h. • cost _ 14 £
test 3
• weight _ 700gr. • printing time _ 5h. • cost _ 20 £
test 4
• weight _ 700gr. • printing time _ 5h. • cost _ 20 £
test 5
• weight _ 650gr. • printing time _ 4h. • cost _ 14 £
test 6
• weight _ 750gr. • printing time _ 5h. • cost _ 15£
test 7
• weight _ 650gr. • printing time _ 4h. • cost _ 14 £
03 Toothpath
Toothpath in the tiles (aggregation pieces)
Combination one: three tiles in blocks
Combination one:tracing in structure
Combination one:voxelize the tiles
04 INTERLOCK
Research case
Test 1: voxles size: 32mm*96mm*64mm number of voxles:4
Test 2: voxles size: 32mm*96mm*32mm number of voxles:2
Instrument for clicking system: left:32mm*40mm right:20mm*40mm
Test 1: toothpath for interlock size: 32mm*96mm*64mm
Test 2: toothpath for interlock size: 32mm*96mm*32mm
Instrument for clicking system: toothpath click in the groove of interlock part
Test 1 INTERLOCK : material:PLA fitlament (white)MAKER BOT TOOTHPATH: material:PLA fitlament (BLACK) ROBOT ABB 120
Test 2 INTERLOCK : material:PLA fitlament (white)MAKER BOT TOOTHPATH: material:PLA fitlament (white) ROBOT ABB 120
Test 3 INTERLOCK : material:PLA fitlament (white)MAKER BOT TOOTHPATH: material:PLA fitlament (BLACK) ROBOT ABB 120
Test case 1 size: 64mm*4mm*50mm
Test case 5
Test case2 size: 60mm*4mm*32mm
Test case 1+Test case2
Test case 1+Test case2+Test3
Test case 3 size: 40mm*5mm*32mm
Interlock partA+B:Test case1,Test case1
Test case 4 size: 32mm*6mm*40mm
Interlock part A :Test case 1+Test case2+Test3
Test case 5 size: 32mm*40mm*40mm
Interlock part A :Test case 1+Test case3+Test4
Test case 1: voxles size: 96mm*96mm*128mm number of voxles:10
Test case 2: voxles size: 96mm*96mm*96mm number of voxles:9
Test case 3: voxles size: 96mm*96mm*96mm number of voxles:6
Test case 4: voxles size: 96mm*96mm*96mm number of voxles:6
Test case 1: male part size: 160mm*320mm*64mm material:PLA fitlament (black)
Test case 2: male part size: 96mm*96mm*128mm material:PLA fitlament (black)
Test case 3: male part size: 96mm*96mm*96mm material:PLA fitlament (black)
Test case 4: male part size: 96mm*96mm*96mm material:PLA fitlament (black)
Test case 1: interlock part size: 96mm*96mm*128mm material:PLA fitlament (black)
Test case 1: female part size: 160mm*320mm*64mm material:PLA fitlament
05 ROBOTIC ASSEMBLY pick and place process
W
e (INTILE) aims to achieve a fully reversible and robotic assembly structure. To achieve this point, an interlocking system has been
developped. This mechanism allows us to assemble and disassemble the pieces as many times is required. Two scenarios has been analyezed, the first one is based on fabrication and assemble on a factory and a seconde one where the fabrication and assemble is directly on site. The main different between both scenarios is based on the shipping method. In the first one the pieces has to shipped to the place once the has been produced, this fact produced and increment of the cost of the shipping. On the other hand, the second scenario allow as to ship the robotic arm and the extruder whereever is needed. By this method, the shipping cost is reduced drastically. Gripper part
The project InfiniteVoxels aims to achieve a fully robotic assembly through a robotic arm. A pneumatic gripper has been used to grip the pieces, the gripping part of the gripper has been customized to be adapted to the dimension of the pieces. There are two bases were designed for picking and placing. According to robot working space and the limited rotation of the robot arm, small pieces could be picked from three different surfaces, Long piece and floor slab could be picked by one point.
Gripper
Pick & Place Process
06 BPRO PROTOTYPE
Bpro prototype:aggregation with tiles
Bpro prototype:tracing line and structure lines
Bpro prototype:continues tracing lines in 2D
TOTAL STRUCTURE Number of tiles (total):14 Time cost (approximately):13days Cost(PLA): 300pounds
06 BPRO PROTOTYPE
06 BPRO PROTOTYPE
aggregation case5 tile number:14
aggregationcase4 tile number:14
aggregationcase3 tile number:14
aggregationcase2 tile number:14
aggregationcase1 tile number:14
aggregationcase10 tile number:14
aggregationcase9 tile number:14
aggregationcase8 tile number:14
aggregationcase7 tile number:14
aggregationcase6 tile number:14
aggregation case 15 tile number:14
aggregationcase14 tile number:14
aggregationcase13 tile number:14
aggregationcase12 tile number:14
aggregationcase20 tile number:14
aggregationcase19 tile number:14
aggregationcas18 tile number:14
aggregationcase17 tile number:14
aggregationcase11 tile number:14
aggregationcase 16 tile number:14
08 ARCHITECTURAL SPECULATION
08 ARCHITECTURAL SPECULATION
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS:
We would like to express our gratitude to our tutors Gillees Retsin, Manuel Jimenez Garcia and Vicente Soler Senent (Research Cluster 4 tutors at Bartlett School of Architecture, UCL) for their advice and support in both the research and design projects throughout the year. We are also deeply indebted to all the staff at the B-MADE.
The Bartlett School of Architecture MArch Architecture Design Research Cluster 4
Check more information: Portfolio: https://issuu.com/2273270/docs/infinitevoxels Video:https://vimeo.com/237963485