Mating disruption
Agronomic practices
Monitoring
Virus Cpgv
Physical control
Biological control
.41109.Be
C
intercropping
o m p o a i ne d y
lla
I n t e g r at e d P e s t M a n a g e M e n t
steinernema carpocapsae
design : www
| Working with nature
Pl. VII
| Working with nature
Pl. XI
I n t e g r at e d P e s t M a n a g e M e n t
Bacillus Thuringiensis
Mass trapping
Trichogramma achaea
b s a olu a t t u a T
Monitoring
Physical control
Biological control
.41109.Be
Agronomic practices
nesid iocoris tenuis
design : www
Mating disruption
| Working with nature
Pl. II
a
Lo
botra a i s be
m
I n t e g r at e d P e s t M a n a g e M e n t
Bacillus thuringiensis
Mating disruption
Monitoring
Physical control
Biological control
design : www
Agronomic practices
.41109.Be
decision support system
| Working with nature
Pl. V V
Po
y m r e ild d w e
w
I n t e g r at e d P e s t M a n a g e M e n t
Pruning
disease forecasting models
Resistant variety
Monitoring
Physical control
Biological control
design : www
Agronomic practices
.41109.Be
Ampelomyces quisqualis
Pl. I
Biological control
Monitoring,
Agronomic practices such as
Agronomic practices
natural control
forecasting,
crop rotation, resistant varieties,
Monitoring
warning systems
undersowing, intercropping, protection and
Physical control
enhancement of beneďŹ cials
Biological control
.41109.Be
Mechanical, physical,
design : www
I n t e g r at e d P e s t M a n a g e M e n t
| Working with nature
Chemical control
| Working with nature
Pl. IX
d iabr o
gifera r i v a v c it
ifera irg
I n t e g r at e d P e s t M a n a g e M e n t
Crop rotation
Monitoring
Physical control
Biological control
design : www
Agronomic practices
.41109.Be
Heterorhabditis bacteriophora
25
n ov e M b r e
2014
8
céréalIers et
3
P o ly c u lt e u r s e l e v e u r s
Photo © Catherine Voisin
Photo prise à Bézu la foret, proche de Etrepagny Bordure du plateau du Vexin Normand
50%
de réductIon de l’usage de ProduIts
P h y t o s a n I ta I r e s e s t P o s s I b l e P o u r c e s c é r é a l I e r s e t P o ly c u lt e u r s é l e v e u r s
50%
reductIon of Plant ProtectIon Products
use Is PossIble for these cereal Producers
Agronomic practices
Monitoring
Physical control
Biological control
.41109.Be
a n d M I x e d c ro P s a n d l I v e s to c k fa r M e r s
design : www
I n t e g r at e d P e s t M a n a g e M e n t
| Working with nature
Pl. IV
Pl. VIII
A N N EX III
21 o ctober 2009
general
P r I n c I P l e s o f I n t e g r at e d P e s t M a n a g e M e n t
1. The prevention and/or suppression of harmful organisms should be achieved or supported among other options especially by:
—
—
— —
— protection and enhancement of important beneficial organisms, e.g. by adequate plant protection measures or the utilisation of ecological infrastructures inside and outside production sites.
Agronomic practices
4. Sustainable biological, physical and 8. Based on the records on the use of other non-chemical methods must pesticides and on the monitoring of be preferred to chemical methods if harmful organisms the professional they provide satisfactory pest control. user should check the success of the applied plant protection measures. 5. The pesticides applied shall be as specific as possible for the target and shall have the least side effects on human health, non-target organisms and the environment.
Monitoring
Physical control
Biological control
.41109.Be
—
2. Harmful organisms must be 6. The professional user should keep monitored by adequate methods and the use of pesticides and other forms tools, where available. Such adequate of intervention to levels that are tools should include observations necessary, e.g. by reduced doses, in the field as well as scientifically reduced application frequency or crop rotation, sound warning, forecasting and early partial applications, considering diagnosis systems, where feasible, that the level of risk in vegetation is use of adequate cultivation as well as the use of advice from acceptable and they do not increase techniques (e.g. stale seedbed professionally qualified advisors. the risk for development of resistance technique, sowing dates and in populations of harmful organisms. densities, under-sowing, conservation 3. Based on the results of the tillage, pruning and direct sowing), monitoring the professional user has 7. Where the risk of resistance use, where appropriate, of resistant/ to decide whether and when to apply against a plant protection measure tolerant cultivars and standard/ plant protection measures. Robust is known and where the level of certified seed and planting material, and scientifically sound threshold harmful organisms requires repeated values are essential components application of pesticides to the use of balanced fertilisation, liming for decision making. For harmful crops, available anti-resistance and irrigation/drainage practices, organisms threshold levels defined strategies should be applied to preventing the spreading of harmful for the region, specific areas, crops maintain the effectiveness of the organisms by hygiene measures and particular climatic conditions products. This may include the (e.g. by regular cleansing of must be taken into account before use of multiple pesticides with machinery and equipment), treatments, where feasible. different modes of action.
design : www
I n t e g r at e d P e s t M a n a g e M e n t
| Working with nature
dIrectIve 2009/128/ec of the euroPean ParlIaMent and of the councIl e s ta b l I s h I n g a f r a M e Wo r k f o r c o M M u n I t y ac t I o n to ac h I e v e t h e s u s ta I n a b l e u s e o f P e s t I c I d e s
MS can encourage reductions of pesticide use e.g. by suppor ting v oluntary integ rated f arming methods (incl. voluntary elements of Integrated Crop Management) through agri-environment-climate schemes.
C AN
MS must implement ecological focus areas and the crop div ersification scheme and promote good f arming practices for pesticides reduction. it remains to be seen how Ms will implement the greening and if they will promote the non use of pesticide in the eFAs. MUS T
greeni ng of direct Payments
CAN
Rural development
CAN
C AN
some Ms are al ready doi ng so, i t remai ns to be seen how the introduction of the general principles of iPM will influence baseline of such schemes. CA N
Fruit & Vegetable Regulation
MU ST
insurance linked to yield
CAN M U ST
Farm Advisory systems MS must offer f armers advises on rules under Cross Compliance b ut also on the SUDP and the WFD in particular aiming at reducing pesticide usage and informing about IPM.
it remains to be seen, what kind of advice, including on iPM, will be off ered.
Member states: Ms
Farmers
Pesticide Action network
Agronomic practices
dynamic approaches, increasing the iPM baseline Mandatory crop rotation in the CAP
Cross compliance MS must link the Regulation on Pesticides to CAP payments through Cross Compliance. The GAEC provide also a tool for a better use of pesticides (buffer strips, etc.). In the future cer tain aspects of the SUDP and WFD will become part of Cross Compliance after all MS have defined the obligations directly applicable to farmers.
it remai ns to be seen when and wha t kind of measures, including iPM.
eFAs : ecological Focus Areas g AeC: good envi ronmental and Agricultural Practice iCM: integrated Crop Management
Monitoring
MU ST
Physical control
iP: integrated Production iPM: integrated Pest Management sUdP : directive on sustainable Use of Pesticides wFd: w ater Framework directive
Biological control
.41109.Be
some Ms are al ready doing so, i t remai ns to be seen how the introduction of the general principles of iPM wi ll i nfluence baseline of such schemes
MS can encourage reductions of pesticide usage, e.g. under the so-called Integrated Production as par t of the environmental actions of the opera tional programmes.
design : www
I n t e g r at e d P e s t M a n a g e M e n t
| Working with nature
Pl. X
Pl. VI
Buckwheat
Birds
Cornflower
delia radicum
Hover flies
Teasel
wi ld bees pollinisation
Parasitic wasps
Borage
Lacy phacelia
Pieris spp
Yellow ha m m er © C live Tim m o n s | Bir d Life Eu r o pe
Lady bugs
Perennial cornflower
Agronomic practices
Monitoring
Physical control
Biological control
.41109.Be
F U R T H E R I N F O R M AT I O N AT W W W . E C O S TA C . C O . U K
design : www
I n t e g r at e d P e s t M a n a g e M e n t
| Working with nature
brassIca
Pl. III
Buckwheat
Birds
Cornflower
sitobion avenae
Hover flies
Teasel
wi ld bees pollinisation
Borage
Lacy phacelia
Rhopalosiphum padi
Parasitic wasps
Yellow ha m m er © C live Tim m o n s | Bir d Life Eu r o pe
Lady bugs
Perennial cornflower
Agronomic practices
Monitoring
Physical control
Biological control
.41109.Be
F U R T H E R I N F O R M AT I O N AT W W W . E C O S TA C . C O . U K
design : www
I n t e g r at e d P e s t M a n a g e M e n t
| Working with nature
Wheat