Using data to raise achievement
Jenny Francis November 2012
Priorities; Which issues might have an impact on pupils’ learning?
Hypotheses; What are the first tentative messages from the data?
Confidence with, and understanding of performance Data
Action; What do we need to do to improve learning outcomes for pupils?
Questions; What specific questions need to be addressed?
Prprimary 78 pages, sec pages
Attainmentt
progress
2011 data
20112011 data
Narrowing the Gaps - Free School Meals This report aims to provide schools with a single, easy-to-use and comprehensive overview of the attainment and progress of pupils eligible for Free School Meals. School Context 2009 2010 2011 20th 40th 60th 80th percentile percentile percentile percentile % of pupils known to be eligible for free school meals (FSM) School
5.7
3.9
0.9
Nationa 17.0 l
18.5
19.2
0.0
5.3
9.9
17.3
30.4
90.1
Pre Comp
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year 5
Year 6
18
15
8
18
16
14
18
Number on roll %FSM
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.6 Please note that the above data was sourced from the schools January 2011 census therefore the year groups displayed above refer to the academic year 2010/11. Key Stage 1 to Key Stage 2 value added: Free School Meals Overall
English
Mathematics
Cohor VA 95% VA Cohort VA 95% VA Cohort VA 95% VA t for School Confi Nationa for VA School Confid Nationa for VA School Confiden Nation VA Score dence l Score Score ence l Score Score ce al Interv Interv Interval Score al al All Pupils
18
99.6
0.9
100.0
18
99.6
1.0
100.0
18
99.8
1.2
100.0
FSM
1
98.6
-
99.7
1
98.6
-
99.6
1
98.6
-
99.7
Non FSM
17
99.6
1.0
100.0
17
99.5
0.9
100.0
17
99.8
1.2
100.0
Percentage achieving expected progress, 2011 English and mathematics Free School Meals English Mathematics School National School National Cohort Achieving Non Average Cohort Achieving Non FSM Average Expected FSM Difference Expected Average Differen Progress Averag Progress ce % e %
All Pupils
18
89
84
5
18
94
84
10
Non FSM FSM Within School Gap
17 1
88 100 12
84 84
4 16
17 1
94 100 6
84 84
10 16
Average point scores, 2011, English and Maths by Free School Meals All NC Core Subjects English School National School National Cohort APS Non Average Cohort APS Non Average FSM Differen FSM Differen Averag ce Average ce e All Pupils 18 27.7 27.9 -0.2 18 27.0 27.8 -0.8 Non FSM FSM Within School Gap
17 1
28.4 15.0 -13.4
27.9 27.9
0.5 -12.9
17 1
27.7 15.0 -12.7
27.8 27.8
-0.1 -12.8
Mathematics School National Cohort APS Non FSM Average Average Differen ce 18
28.3
28.1
0.2
17 1
29.1 15.0 -14.1
28.1 28.1
1.0 -13.1
Percentage of pupils attaining or surpassing each level in 2011 in Key Stage 2 for all national curriculum subjects FSM
All Pupils Non FSM FSM Within School Gap
All Pupils Non FSM FSM Within School Gap
Percentage of Key Stage 2 pupils achieving level 4 or above English Mathematics English & Mathematics School National School National School National Cohort % Non Averag Cohort % Non Averag Cohort % Non Average FSM e FSM e FSM Differenc Averag Differe Averag Differe Averag e e nce e nce e 18 83 84 -1 18 83 83 -0 18 83 78 5 17 1
88 0 -88
84 84
4 -84
17 1
88 0 -88
83 83
5 -83
17 1
88 0 -88
78 78
10 -78
Percentage of Key Stage 2 pupils achieving level 5 or above English Mathematics English & Mathematics School National School National School National Cohort % Non Averag Cohort % Non Averag Cohort % Non Average FSM e FSM e FSM Differenc Averag Differe Averag Differe Averag e e nce e nce e 18 28 32 -4 18 44 38 6 18 28 24 4 17 1
29 0 -29
32 32
-3 -32
17 1
47 0 -47
38 38
9 -38
17 1
29 0 -29
24 24
5 -24
Data analysis will never raise attainment nor achievement Only attention to good quality teaching will ever make a difference.