ALI MIRZA AND HIS BELIEVES THAT SHIRK IS NOT KUFR

WHAT ALI MIRZA BORROWED FROM BARAILVIS WITH MODIFICATIONS. Khairabadis believe that there are only two articles of Shirk.

1] To believe that a Ghairullah is Necessary Being [Va:jibulvuju:d].

2] To believe that a Ghairullah deserves to be worshipped [Musth:iq 'Al "-ba:dah].

Beside these two believesthey do not believe that any belief is Shirk.

Barailvis believe that there is just one article of Shirk and that is as follow: 3] To believe that atleast one Attribute of a Ghairullah is Essential [Dh:a:ti].

Some modern Barailvis have combine both of the two stated above sects and believe that there are three articles of Shirk.

So if a person believes in any article of Shirk other then these three articles these Modern Barailvis declare that he is a Muvah:h:id and not a Musrik and claim that he is a Muslim.

The basis of this belief is that they do not consider any belief other then these three believes as Shirk.

How ever even they accept that if a person believes in God, His Prophet, Qur'a:n and even 'Ah:adi:th: yet additionally believes in atleast one of the mensioned above articles of Shirk, He is not only a Musrik but also a Ghairu Muslim [Non Muslim] .

On the contrary All the 'Ahlussunnah declare such a person who believe in any article of Shirk as Kafir, but they do not confine Shirk to the Stated above articles of Shirk. They are more in number.

Borrowing from the stated above cult and from Zubair "Ali: Zai "Ali Mirza: of Jhelum invented a new view that there are a number of articles of Shirk yet they are not Kufr.

That is why he is trying to save those heretics from the verdict of Kufr who do believe in several articles of Shirk.

Actually some Brailvis did make a distinction between Shirk and

Kufr and claimed that not all Shirk is Kufr.

For example according to them praying any Ghairullah for any thing or asking any Ghairullah for help is not Shirk nor Kufr.

To offer prayers [in the meaning of Worshipping towards any human being or grave is Kufr but not Shirk.

Since according to the rule made by 'Ah:mad Rad:a: of Bans Baraili it is not Kufr.

His rule is as follow: If a thing is Shirk for any Creation then it is Shirk for all Creations.

This implies if a thing is not Shirk for any Creation then it is not Shirk for any Creation.

From this they conclude that as it is not Shirk to Worship Deity in direction of Ka"bah which is a Creation of Deity , it is not Shirk if Ka"bah is replaced by any him being or any grave or any other building ,since they all are creation of Deity.

How ever they accepted that such an activity is Kufr since they claimed that Laws mensioned above are not for Kufr but for Shirk.

"Ali: Mirza: who borrowed a part from Barailvism made changes while borrowing and claimed that these are Shirk but not Kufr.

WE ASK "ALI: MIRZA: THE JHELUMITE THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS TO EXPOSE HIS APOSTATIC AND HERETIC BELIEVES. 1] IF A PERSON RECITES K-LMAH , BELIEVES IN GOD, HIS PROPHET, IN THE TEXT OF QUR'A:N AND IN THE TEXTS OF 'AHA:DI:TH: YET BELIEVES IN ATLEAST ON OF THE FOLLOWING BELIEVES , THEN HE IS A MUSLIM OR NOT A MUSLIM AS ACCORDING "ALI: MIRZA: := 1] A Ghairullah [ATLEAST ONE]is Necessary Being [Va:jibulvuju:d].

2] A Ghairullah [ATLEAST ONE] deserves to be worshipped [Must-h:iq 'Al "-ba:dah].

3]Atleast one Attribute of [ATLEAST ONE] Ghairullah is Essential [Dh:a:ti].

If "Ali: Mirza declares such a person as a Non Muslim i.e Kafir then his own system is fasified and if flawed.

If "ALI MIRZA: claims that such a person is still a Muslim then he becomes himself not only a Mushrik but also a Kafir even from the

standard of those from which he essentially borrowed.

It may be noted that "Ali: Mirza: has stated that A Shirk may not be Kufr.

He claims that only the Shirk of Mushrikin of "Arab in the Time Of Holy Prophet was Kufr. A part from it No Shirk Is Kufr.

So such a person who believes in ATLEAST one of the mensioned above Articles of Shirk can interpret verses of Of Qur'a:n by using different heretic ideas like that of "Ali: Mirza: and some other cults.

It is to be noted that Engineer "Ali: Mirza: has declared that 'Imam 'Ibn Taimiah RH: has commited Kufr [note "Ali: Mirza: does not say Shirk] when "Ali: Mirza: Misinterprets his sentence "Temporals Have No Beginnning".

Now if this statement is Kufr according to the Jhelumite Engineer then the Question is whether it is also Shirk or Not [as according to "Ali Mirza:] .

If Not then he is fiully exposed once for all that according to him a Shirk is not Kufr but this statement is Kufr.

If it is then his system is falsified.

If is immediatley and indispensibly implied that he devides Shirk in two types. One Which con make a person Kafir who recites K-lmah, and one which cannot make such aperson as Kafir.

[We do not agree with "Ali: Mirza that the statement ascribed to 'Ima:m 'Ibn Taimiah RH: is Kufr, though one may disagree from it. The question we have asked is just for sake of argument.]

"Ali Mirza is just playing with the 'Iman [Faith] of his audiance. For God's sake recognise this Apostate Engineer. He is an enemy of faith , truth and reality.

Is it not sufficient for the audiances of "Ali Mirza that he is the Most

Heretic Apostate in our times.