DEFENCE OF HOLY PROPHET, SAIYIDUNA “UMAR AND ‘IBN ‘ABI BALTA”AH [H:A:T:IB] AGAINST THE FALSE ALLEGAT

DEFENCE OF HOLY PROPHET, SAIYIDUN A “UMAR AND ‘IBN ‘ABI BALTA”AH [H:A:T:IB] AGAINST THE FALSE ALLEGATI ON OF “ALI MIRZA

1

AH20 17 CE

1

A PROOF OF THE CLAIM THAT

2

2

3

DEFENCE OF HOLY PROPHET, SAIYIDUNA UMAR, SAIYIDUNA HATIB ,IMAM MUSLIM AND SAHIH MUSLIM AGAINST THE FALSE ALLEGATIONS OF ENGINEER ALI MIRZA OF JHELUM BY ‘AHLUSSUNNAH VS “ALI MIRZA Saiyudna Ibn ‘Abi Balta”ah was a Great S:ah:a:bi: and one who had take part in the War of Badr.

But he committed a mistake , an error. He attemted to revealed a Secret Of Holy Prophet to the Polytheists of Makkah/Maccah.

Imam Muslim in S:ah:i:h: Muslim have brought this tradition.

Tradition Number := [6401] 161 - (2494) The Tradition says := [64011 161 - (2494) "We set out, with our horses galloping, and we found the woman. We said: 'Give us the letter.' She said: 'I do not have a letter.' We said: 'Either you give us the letter, or we will remove your clothes (to search for the letter).' So she brought it out from her braided hair, and we brought it to the Messenger of Allah i&. And in it (was written): 'From Hâtib bin Abl Balt'ah' to 3

4 some of the idolaters of Makkah, telling them something about the Messenger of Allah.

Messenger of Allah

Said O Hâtib, what is this?' He said: 'Do not be hasty in judging me, 0 Messenger of Allah. I am a man who was attached to the Quraish' - Sufyân (a sub narrator) said: 'He was an ally of theirs, but he was not one of them' - 'and the MuhâjirIn …..with you have relatives

who will protect their families. As I have no blood ties among them, I wanted to do them a favor so that they would protect my family.

I did not do it out of disbelief or because I apostatized from my religion, nor because I approved of disbelief after becoming Muslim."

"The Messenger of Allah said: 'He has spoken the truth.'

'Umar said: '0 Messenger of Allah, let me strike the neck of this hypocrite.[Muna:fiq] ' He () said: "He was present at (the battle of) Badr, and you do not know, perhaps Allah looked upon the people of Badr and said:

'Do what you wish, for I have forgiven you.'

Then Allah revealed the words: '0 you who believe! Take not My enemies and your enemies (i.e. disbelievers and polytheists) as friends.'

[A1-Mumtahanah 60:1. ]

This is the tradition in S:ah:i:h: Muslim.

This sheweth that the Holy Prophet did not declared H:at:ib RD: as Kafir or Muna:fiq in the Technical meaning . That is the word Muna:fiq stated by Saiyiduna: “Umar Rad:I Yallahu “Anhu was not in the Term of Law [Shar”] but in the very literal meaning.

4

5

Reasons for taking the term in Literal meaning.

1] When Siyiduna: H:at:ib [Ibn Abi Balta”ah RD:] said “ I did not do it out of from my religion, nor because I disbelief or because I apostatized approved of disbelief after becoming Muslim."

Holy Prophet Confirmed his sentences as follow: The tradition of Holy Muslim Does Say that Holy Prophet did Say:=

“He has spoken the truth.”

In this case after the confirmation by the Holy Prophet Saiyiduna: “Umar RD: cannot doubt the very faith of Siyiduna: H:at:ib RD:.

So he used the word as a word of “Arabic and in the Literal Meaning which pre-existed in “Arabic Language even before the birth and Propherhood of Holy Prophet.

2] If Saiyiduna “Umar RD: had used this word as a Term of Law {SH-R”} then Holy Prophet Peace Be Upon Him Must Have Corrected Him by contradicting Him that H:a:t:ib Ibn ‘Abi Balta”ah RD: is not a Muna:fiq.

So the allegation of Apostate “Ali Mirza on Saiyiduna: “Umar RD: that in case H:at:ib RD: was a Muslim Saiyiduna: “Umar committed a great error by declaring him a Muna:fiq becomes incorrect and wrong.

So why Holy Prophet did not Contradict Saiyiduna: “Umar RD: when he declared H:a:t:ib as a Muna:fiq, is due to the reason Saiyiduna: “Umar RD: did not used the word Muna:fiq as a term of Sh-r”,BUT in a Literal Meaning.

3] The same tradition is found in Musnad Ahmad. See Tradition 829 Ali ibn Abu Talib reported: The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, sent for me an Az-Zubair ibn Al-Awwam while we were both on horseback and he said, “Go to suchand-such meadow. There is a woman there who has a letter with her from Hatib to the idolaters; bring her to me.” We found her along with one of her camels just as the Prophet described her. We said, “Give us the letter you have with you.” She said, “I do not have a latter.”

We searched her and the camel and my companion said, “I do not see it.” I said, “The Prophet does not lie; by the one in whose hand is my soul, I will strip her until she gives it up!” She put her hand in the know of her shawl and brought out the letter. We returned to the Prophet and they said, “O Messenger of Allah, Hatib has betrayed the believers! Let us strike his neck!” The Prophet said, “O Hatib, what made you do it?” Hatib said, “O Messenger of Allah, do not be hasty with me for I believe in Allah and His Messenger, but I had no one to protect my family and my wealth in Mecca, although every one of your companions has someone here to protect his family and his wealth.” The Prophet said, “He has been truthful, so do not say anything to him except goodness.”

Umar said, “O Messenger of Allah, verily, he has betrayed Allah and His Messenger (Innahu Qad Khanallah Va R-su:l-hu) and the believers, so let me strike his neck!”

The Prophet said, “Is he not among those who fought with us at the battle of Badr? You do not know if perhaps Allah the Exalted has pardoned him and He has said: do whatever you

5

6

will because I have guaranteed for you Paradise.” Upon hearing this, Umar started weeping and he said, “Allah the Exalted and His Messenger know best.”

829 ‫مسند أحمد خملسننخد اللنعنشنردة اللخمبنرشدرنينن دباللنجنردة خملسننخد اللخخلننفادء الررادشددنينن اعملوا ما شئتم فقد وجبت لكم الجنة‬

This tradition of Masnad explaineth that the word Muna:fiq was in the meaning of Kha:’in and in the meaning of “One Who Doeth Not Believe in ‘ALL-H and His Prophet in Heart and Purporteth to be a Believer”. But One Who Betrays. Not all Betrayals are Nifa:q.

So The Word Munafiq in the Tradition of Muslim “6401” is in the meaning of a Betrayer and not in the meaning of “ One Who doeth not Believe but Purporteth to believe” but one who transgresses or exposes the secret of Holy Prophet.

4] ‘Ima:m Muslim have brought the tradition as follow: Chapter 36. The Virtues Of Hâtib Bin AbI Balta'ah And The People Of Badr, May Allah Be Pleased With Them MuhâjirIn

If Saiyiduna: “Umar RD: Had used the word Muna:fiq as a Term Of Law [Sh-r”-h] ‘Ima:m Muslim must not have brought this tradition in the said chapter.

CONSPARACY OF ENGINER “ALI: MIRZA AGAINST HOLY PROPHET (S:-“-V-S) SAIYIDUNA “UMAR RD: , SAIYIDUNA H:AT:IB AND ‘IMAM MUSLIM) 1]Engineer “Ali: Mirza tries to make a dilemma that if Saiyiduna H:a:t:ib was a Muslim then Saiyiduna: “Umar RD: became a Kafir [Na”u:dh:ubillah] since one who call a Muslim as a Kafir then his Takfi:r returns upon himself. If Saiyiduna “Umar RD: is still a Muslim then ‘Ibn ‘Abi Balta”ah [H:a:t:ib] RD: is a Kafir/Muna:fiq. The response to this dilemma is that the horns of the DILEMMA are broken. The word Munafiq is not used in the Technical Meaning i.e not as a Technical Term but in a Literal Meaning, a meaning which has a Pre –Existence i.e it pre-existeth and existeth even before Holy Prophet was born and Prophetized. Now every thing is clear.

2]Additionally Apostate Engineer wants to shew his followers that even Holy Prophet accepted that ‘Ibn ‘Abi Balta”ah was a Kafir or a Muna:fiq. But if this was the case then Imam Muslim must not have considered it among the virtues of Saiyiduna: H:ât:ib Bin Abi Balta'ah RD: .

3]Engineer “Ali: Mirza tries to shew in his apostate speech that Holy Prophet was in doubt whether [Saiyiduna:] H:a:t:ib ‘Ibn ‘Abi Balta”ah RD: was to be forgiven or not. But this is because Engineer “Ali Mirza destructive mind of the Apostate has not pointed at the following tradition:

[6403] 162 - (2495) .

It was narrated from Jâbir that a Slave of H:ât:ib came to the Messenger of ALL-H, complaining about H:ât:ib.

He said: "0 Messenger of ALL-H, H:ât:ib is going to go to Hell." The Messenger of Allah said: "Thou art lying, he is not going to go to 6

7

Hell, for he was present at (the Battle/War of) Badr and Al-Hudaibiyah."

This completeth the proof that Holy Prophet was not in doubt that H:a:t:ib RD: was a Muslim .

He was not going to Hell . Holy Prophet was speaking the truth. So why he said a sentence which has an apparent doubt in it.

He (Holy Prophet) said: "He was present at (the battle of) Badr, and you do not know, perhaps Allah looked upon the people of Badr and said: 'Do what you wish, for I have forgiven you.' Then Allah revealed the words: '0 you who believe! Take not My enemies and your enemies (i.e. disbelievers and polytheists) as friends.'

[A1-Mumtahanah 60:1] The answer is very simple this is a Doubt of Majesty.

Plural of Majesty is used by ‘ALL-H for Himself , and this does not mean any plurality of Hypostases . Since ALL-H is Absolutely Unique. And Plurality of Hypostases are Self Absurd in the Divine Essence [Dha:tul Ba:ri:]. Similarly this is a “Doubt of Majesty”.A doubt of Majesty means that the words of certainty and certitudes may not be used for Divine Essence [‘ALL-H] to shew that Divine Power is more than the Divine Promise and not to shew doubt in the Promise.

Laalla is some time use to shew Divine Power/ Omnipotence. DIVINE OMNIPOTENCE IS EVEN UPON DIVINE PROMISE. This refutes the Mu”tazilite claim that it is not in Divine Omnipotence that Divine Essence violateeth His Promise. Silsilah of Khairabadi and Late Zubair“Ali: Zai were also of these views. But all the True and Real ‘Ahlussunnah do believe that Divine Essence Hath Omnipotence over the Violation of His made Promises. That is Violation is not an ABSOLUTE ABSURD/ ABSOLUTE IMPOSSIBLE but a Relative Absurd/ Relative Impossible. An Absolute Absurd is not in Divine Power like a Parallel Deity [Shari:k ‘Al Ba:ri:]. But a Relative Absurd is in Divine Power yet it is never to be exercised and never to be practiced by the Divine Essence [Dh:a:tul Ba:ri:].

“Ali Mirza is a Mu”tazilite in this regaerd that is why he does not believe in Divine Omnipotence over the violation of Divine Promises.

It must be noted that Absolute Cpontingencey /Absolute Possibility does not imply doubts in Non Occurance if it is Relatively Absurd/ Occurancial Impossible.

TO THE FOLLOWERS OF APOSTATE ENGINEER “ALI MIRZA Up till now no ‘Ahlussunnah has declared a Badri S:ah:abi as a Muna:fiq in the Technical meaning.

Fafd: of the Heretic Engineer is once again Exposed. How many examples are needed to convince you that Engineer of Jhelum is a Sadistic Apostate.

Do you still need mor evidence that he is the most heretic mind of the current century.

7

8

05-09-1438 AH And 01-06-2017 ce AHLUSSUnnAH VS enGIneeR ALI MIRZA

Supposed Case Let it be supposed for the sake of an argument that the Engineer “ALI MIRZA is correct [May God Forbid] in his view that Saiyiduna: “Umar RD: Claimed that H;a:t:ib ‘Ibn ‘Abi Balta”ah was a Muna:fiq in the terminological meaning with the following definition.

A Muna:fiq is one who purporteth to believe in Religion Of ‘Islam , but actually denieth the Religion (secretly).

There are two Possible Objections in the Supposed Case.

THE FIRST POSSIBLE OBJECTION In this SUPPOSED case the First Possible Objection Of “Ali: Mirza: is that according to a tradition := “One who declareth a Muslim as a Ka:fir/Ca:fir and the latter is not then the Kufr returneth to the declarer” the Kufr must return to Saiyiduna: “Umar RD:”.

This is the objection that is exposed in the lecture of Apostate “Ali: Mirza.

But even this objection in the supposed case is incorrect.

Since Saiyiduna: “Umar Opined in the supposed case that the act of Betrayal is a Nifa:q and one who committed this act is a Muna:fiq.

And Holy Prophet corrected Him .

Points to be noted.

1] Kufr is different fron Nifa:q in some meanings and a Muna:fiq is a Kafir in the broad meaning yet it is a different case in strict meaning.

It is just like the case that a ‘Ahlul Kita:b [People Of the Book] is a Ka:fir [ Non Muslim] in the BROAD MEANING yet it constitute a separate case in strict or less broad meaning.

So the tradition : “One who declareth a Muslim as a Ka:fir/Ca:fir and the latter is not then the Kufr returneth to the declarer” Is about a\declaring some one as Ka:fir [Ka:f/Ca:f-‘Alif-Fa: -Ra] and not about the Muna:fiq.

8

9 So if Saiyiduna: “Umar had used the Word KA:FIR in the text of his spoken sentence, it would have been the different case yet He [RD:} used the word MUNA:FIQ in the text of the spoken sentence so it constitueth a different case.

“Ali: Mirza of Jhelum City may make an objection on this answer that is in the supposed case, and it is given as follow:= A Muna:fiq is worse than a Ka:fir , so it is strange that for the latter the Kufr returns and for the former it deoth not.

2] A Logical answer is that Kufr is an “RD: [ACCIDENT] and Not a Substance [Jauhar] and it doeth not return by it self but by the Power of Divine Essence [DH:A:TUL BA:RI:] so it is according to Divine Will , whether a thing returneth or it doeth not. So if Divine Essence Himself Hath not made any statement then “ALI: MIRZA cannot compel Divine Essence to act according to his opinions and views.

We follow Divine Essence Nounly [NAMELY] ’ALL-H and not “Ali: Mirza:.

Even “Ali Mirza has no right to suggest Divine Essence what to do and what not to do.

This is a logical response to the invalid objection of the Engineer “Ali: Mirza: of Jhelum City of Panja:b.

Many ‘Ahlussunnah believe that Accidents can be converted in to Substances and it is in Divine Omnipotence to convert an Accident into a Subsatance. Some believe that it is even in Power Of Divine Essence that an Accident can Sustain just by Divine Omnipotence neith with out a Substance not being converted into a Substance.

In any case it depend upon the Divine Eternal Will and not upon the suggestions of the Engineer “Ali: Mirza and his followers.

We have provided a Pure Logical and Philosophical response so that the world may see how illogical and irrational the person of Engineer “Ali: Mirza: is.

3] Additionally there seems to be a Divine Wisdom [H:ikmah/H:icmah] in the returning of Kufr and not of Nifa:q. Since in declaring some one who is a Muslim as Ka:fir it appears that the Declarer is refuting his apparent faith (that is ‘Islamic Faith in the case) , but in declaring some one as Muna:fiq his apparent faith is not appeared to be refuted.

For example if some one declare Engineer “Ali: Mirza: as Ka:fir it appears that The Declarer is refuting the apparent faith of “Ali Mirza: But if some one declares him as a Muna:fiq it appears that The Declarer is not refuting the apparent faith of the Engineer “Ali Mirza:.

If “Ali: Mirza: would have been a Muslim then the difference would have been clear [1].

THE SECOND POSSIBLE OBJECTION ON THE SUPPOSED CASE. 1]Holy Prophet [S:”AVS] Himself was in doubt that whether the ‘A:yah is appeacable to H:at:ib or not. Although this objection has been refuted above yet there is some other possible replies to the Apostate Engineer Of Jhelum.

It may annoy Engineer “Ali: Mirza: Of Jhelum and may amuse the followers and lovers of S:ah:abah RD: that the very same argument can be turned against the Irrational Former Apprentice of Irrational Teacher [2].

9

10 If Saiyiduna: H:a:t:ib was a Muna:fiq then Holy Prophet could not [/must not] apply the Holy Verse of Qur’a:n on Him [i.e H:at:ib RD:].

Since Muna:fiq and Nifa:q [as Terms of Law/ Shar”iah] must exclude the verse “.''Do what you wish, for I have forgiven

You”.

So it is a that proof Saiyiduna: H:at:ib was not a Muna:fiq and Saiyiduna: “Umar cannot be accused of the one upon whom Kufr returned in the supposed case as supposed above (for sake of arguments).

2] If Kufr hath returned to Saiyiduna: “Umar [Na”u:dh:ubillah], Holy Prophet must have warned him that the Kufr hath returned [from the declared one to the one who declared ] and know you must do the Tajdi:d of ‘I:ma:n. But this is not the case. There fore it is false that the Kufr Hath Returned .

But “Ali: Mirza’s opinion implies that Holy Prophet remained silent even if a Kufr occurred in his Holy Presence. [Na”udh:-billah Va ‘Astagh: F-rullah].

This is purely a Rafid:ite Concept OF Holy Prophet , and certainly not the ‘Isla:mic Concept. A concept that is against the “As:mah [Infallibility and Innocence] of Holy Prophet [S:”AVS]

TO THE FOLLOWERS OF ENGINEER “ALI: How many evidences you require to know that “Ali: Mirza: is an Apostate and a Heretic. Are they still not sufficient???? For the sake of ‘ALL-H and His Apostle , please drift from the Engineer Of Jhelum namely “Engineer “Ali: Mirza”.

FOOTNOTES [1] This example is in the Imaginary case , supposing that Engineer “Ali: Mirza: is a Muslim. But in Real case the stated above person is certainly not.

[2] Zubair “Ali: Zai was not an ‘Ahlul H:adi:th: , since he had some differences from the True ‘Ahlul H:adi:th: on some issues which directly expel him from the folds of ‘Ahlul H:adi:th: . So he may be declared as Semi –Ahlul H:adi:th:. But his former Apprentice is not An ‘Ahlul H:adi:th: in particular and not an ‘Ahlussunnah . Also see the first footnote in addition to this one .

NOTE SOME ERRORS OF SPELLINGS, GRAMMAR ETC. MAY HAVE OCCURRED. SO THE AUTHOR IS NOT REPONSIBLE FOR ANY ERROR OF THE TYPIST.

10