1
Juz 8,Su:rah 6 ‘A:yah 12 Rku:” 1 (8,6,1,12) ل ققفل ب هره الررفحنمنة ننففهسهه نعنلىى نكنت ن The Word Kataba in the Verse is averb of Past Tense. A verb implies an Act and not an Attribute. An Act has two inevitable requirements. 1]An Agent of the Act. 2]Beginning and Non Eternity of the Act. Thus the act of Writing of Mercy On Divine Essence Doeth have a Beginning and is Not Eternal. This implieth that the term/result of the act of Writing i.e Mercy is also Hath a Beginning and is Not Eternal. As the Self of Divine Essence is Divine Essence Itself i.e Divine Essence and Divine Self are Absolutely Identical [Not even Relatively Identical] then this implieth that Divine Essence [Dh:a:tul Ba:ri: ] Wrote Mercy on His Own Essence. Now Mainstream of ‘Ahlussunnah do not take this verse in its literal meaning for certain reasons. But in this article we want to ask Engineer “Ali: Mirza: about his views so that we may expose some flaw in his system as evident from his lectures. First:= If Divine Essence did write Mercy on Itself then whether the act of writing Mecry on the Divine Essence is With Divine Will or without Divine Will.In other sentence “The Act of Writing Mercy on Divine Essence