The Sistine Ceiling and the Holy Spirit (©, available for consultation)

Š copyrighted material available for consultation

The Sistine Ceiling and the Holy Spirit Paulo Martins Oliveira

As detailed in parallel studies, the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel combines different layers of meaning, actually following the request of Pope Julius II himself.

The artistic superimposition of various narratives was being explored by Michelangelo and some other painters, refining the previous developments of Sandro Botticelli, who in turn was based on earlier Flemish concepts.

By ordering such multi-layered model, Julius II wanted to ensure that the Sistine Chapel – the main symbol of the Rovere Popes – would also be an intellectual monument, capable of dazzling and challenging the sagacity of all senior clergymen.

In this context, Michelangelo designed sophisticated images that constantly merge the the New Testament. But at the same time, he also incorporated surreptitious levels of that express his freethought views, including subtle criticisms about the papacy institutional Church, as well as considerations on the dual nature of Christ, and even taunts directed at rival artists.

Old and meaning and the personal

Thus, the schemes planned by Michelangelo for the Sistine Chapel can be seen as a complex and protean system.

A significant example of this symbolic engineering is the Creation of Adam, which is deliberately ambiguous and made of compromise solutions.

Michelangelo Buonarroti The Creation of Adam

1

This image does not reflect accurately the Biblical writings regarding the creation of the first man (Old Testament), because the artist merged here another narrative (New Testament), in which there is the Father and the Son generating the Holy Spirit, which should descend and illuminate the clergymen1 This is why the imminent contact of fingers instinctively suggests a creation of energy.

(det.)

A similar beam of inspiring energy is actually materialized in Michelangelo’s The Conversion of Saul/Paul, later painted in the Cappella Paolina, also in the Vatican.

Michelangelo Buonarroti The Conversion of Saul/Paul Cappella Paolina

1 In fact this was a major theological issue for the Roman Catholic Church, since the dissident Eastern Orthodox Church considered the Father as the only source of the Holy Spirit.

2

In this Conversion, Christ is depicted in a relatively conventional manner, whereas in the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel He was merged with Adam, also His ancestor (Lk. 3:23-38).

This partially explains the unusual representation of Christ in the Last Judgment, which is an even more layered character.

The Creation of Adam (det.)

Ceiling of the Sistine Chapel

The Last Judgment (det.)

Sanctuary wall of the Sistine Chapel

“I am the Alpha and the Omega, the beginning and the end, the first and the last�

(Rev. 22:13)

On the other hand, as presented and contextualized in another place, these depictions subtly evoke the human dimension of the Messiah. This issue was particularly important to Michelangelo and to other humanist freethinkers, including Botticelli, whose multi-layered works became a decisive influence, both in form, and especially in content.

Sandro Botticelli Venus and Mars National Gallery, London

Michelangelo Buonarroti The Creation of Adam Ceiling of the Sistine Chapel

3

Indeed, these dynamic designs worked very accurately in overlapped layers, and such concept is actually decisive to understand the true extent of Michelangelo’s works, as well as the paintings of other versatile artists.

2013 akenpapers.bravesites.com akenvis.com

4