LIVEABLE PLACES: PART 1_
DESIGN RESEARCH STUDIO C_ZOOMBURBIA 2.0 | SEMESTER 2, 2020 | SWINBURNE UNIVERSITY Amy Rodda | Master of Architecture & Urban Design - Unit Convenor: Ian Woodcock
ABSTRACT_ *Due to the scope of work undertaken in this studio this is PART 1 of my folio. This semester our Design Research Studio look at critically responding to Victoria’s Plan Melbourne’s 20-Minute Neighbourhoods Principal Strategy, and seeking what this this response would look like strategically, statutorally and spatially. As part of this studio I predominently worked as part of a group, known as Team 4, which was made up of Megan Murray, Arsen Sarkisian and Paris Triantis. Our project is called LiveAble Places and looks at a multi-scalar affordable housing approached to 20-Minute Neighbourhoods. I hope this folio gives you some insight as to what I did throughout Design Research Studio B / C Zoomburbia 2.0! & Team 4’s final proposal for both this studio and the Future Homes Student Competition. I have structured my folio sequentially so that you can get an understanding of what I learnt from this studio & the Liveability of Melbourne as a series of 20-Minute neighbourhoods. So, although the best way to understand this project is to have been part of it & experienced this studio for yourself [especially considering this studio took place remotely during the Covid-19 Pandemic Lockdown], I hope that by flicking through these pages you are able to get a sense of the problems & solutions; questions, processes & outcomes; & concepts, explorations & reflections that came out of Swinburne’s 2020 Zoomburbia 2.0! studio.
LIVEABLE PLACES_
DESIGN RESEARCH STUDIO C_ZOOMBURBIA 2.0 | SEMESTER 2, 2020 | SWINBURNE UNIVERSITY Amy Rodda | Master of Architecture & Urban Design - Unit Convenor: Ian Woodcock
01
ASSEMBLAGES 01
02
MELBOURNE’S SOUTH EAST
03
MASSING / YIELD STUDIES
EXPERIMENTAL MAPPING Abstract / 08-09 Experiential Mapping / 10-23
MACRO-URBANISM STUDIES Abstract / 24-25 South East / 26-41 Monash / 42-57 Dandenong / 58-73 Casey / 74-89 Cardinia / 90-107 Precedents Studies / 108-111
FUTURE HOMES COMPETITION Abstract / 112-113 2 x Lot Amalgamation /114 -115 3 x Lot Amalgamation / 116-117 4 x Lot Amalgamation / 118-119 Massing Studies / 120-121 Building Footprint Studies / 122-123
04
MAPPING DISCUSSIONS
05
FUTURE’S WHEEL
06
RESEARCH PLANNING FRAMEWORK
LAND USE ZONING & PUBLIC OPEN SPACES Abstract / 124-125 Land Use Zoning / 126-145 Public Open Space / 146-165
BRIDGETTE ENGELER | GREY BRIEFINGS Abstract / 166-167 Future’s wheel / 168-169 The Pyramid / 170-173 Leviathan / 174-177 Village / 178-187 Business as Usual / 188-191 Utopian City / 192-193 PESTEL / 194-195
IDENTIFICATION OF STUDY AREAS + ANALYSIS Abstract / 196-197 Projection Thought Process / 198-199 Metropolitan Melbourne / 200-267 Dandenong / 268-289 Brimbank / 290-311 Hume / 312-329
4
EXPERIENTIAL MAPPING_ Our first task for this semester was to sketch what our internal & external routines are, both before the covid-19 pandemic, and now after the covid-19 pandemic began. The reasoning for this is so that we were able to, firstly, start getting an idea as to the spatial arrangement of houses from the perspective of a user, and secondly, to get an understanding as to what infrastructure is necessary to help support people living in 20 minute neighbourhoods - as this is the premise of our studio this semester. I found this task quite fun, and by looking at the ways in which others in our class presented their ideas, gave me inspiration as to how people see and show space.
5
DOMESTIC PATTERNS BEFORE WFH My day to day internal domestic patterns before WFH consisted of me mainly using my bedroom for sleep whilst studying. I am quite a social studier so I would do most of my daily things outside the home - I would wake up, get dressed, and leave the house... come home get ready for bed & sleep.
EXTERNAL PATTERNS BEFORE WFH After leaving the house I would
6
7
8
9
10
11
BEFORE_
AFTER_
12
Melbourne
Canberra
BEFORE_
AFTER_ Inspiration from_ » Sandra | arrow circulation & colour » Paris & Megan | detailed house floorplan » Rafael | heat mapping for time spent in each zone Improvements_ » greater psychological & physical division of zones » design interventions to create better mental health e.g. plants & sunlight
13
BEFORE_
14
BEFORE_ x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
Inspiration from_ » Jimmy | mercator street map » Haroon | different coloured lines for different modes
x
» Emma & John | destination nodes
15
AFTER_
16
AFTER_ x
Improvements_ » importance of designated open public realm interventions such as parks » introduction of public realm life such as street art » wider foot paths for social distancing » more spots to pause to allow for overtaking/cleaning
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
17
BEFORE_
18
AFTER_
BEFORE_
AFTER_ Inspiration from_ » Emma | different icons for different elements » Sandra | sizing & proximity of different elements » Maria | connection reflection Improvements_ » maintaining & enhancing online connections & recreational activities » redistribution of societal priorities such as connection to nature, mental health, home-economics, etc.
19
20
MELBOURNE’S SOUTH EAST_ In our second class of the semester, our studio broke up Metropolitan Melbourne into 7 different regions of Melbourne, to begin investigate the current context of these regions. From here each group took a 2km diameter transect of these regions in order to get a snapshot of the urbanity of the area. My group focussed on the South East Region of Melbourne: namely, the LGAs Monash, Dandenong, Casey & Cardinia, taking a transect of these areas and investigating the South East from both a regional perspective and then a municipal perspective. My group comprised of Nathan Wright, Megan Murray and myself. In order for us to investigate this task, we used a few different programs / portals, including: AURIN, QGIS, Data VIC, ArcGIS. And then finally, we were also asked to begin looking at precedents that would help us get an idea as to what 20 minute neighbourhoods look like.
21
SOUTH EAST REGION_
LGA Boundary
22
MONASH
DANDENONG
CASEY
CARDINIA
23
CULTURAL FREQUENCY_
1-1 >1-2 >2-3
24
25
PTV RAIL NETWORK_
LGA Boundary PTV Rail Corridors PTV Rail Stations
26
27
PTV TRAM NETWORK_
LGA Boundary PTV Rail Corridors PTV Rail Stations
28
29
PTV BUS NETWORK_
LGA Boundary PTV Bus Corridors PTV Bus Stops
30
31
CURRENT CYCLE CORRIDORS_
LGA Boundary Current Cycle Corridors
32
33
PARKLANDS_
Proximity to a 5km Radius of Melbourne Experiencing Stage 4
34
35
EMPLOYMENT RATE_
Proximity to a 5km Radius of Melbourne Experiencing Stage 4
36
37
LGA | MONASH_
38
39
MONASH | POPULATION DENSITY_
3061
40
12623
41
MONASH | DWELLING DENSITY_
42
43
MONASH | PLANNING SCHEME ZONES_ Commercial Zone 1
Commercial Zone 2
Commonwealth Zone
General Residential Zone 2
General Residential Zone 3 General Residential Zone 6 Industrial Zone 1 Mixed Use Zone Neighbourhood Residential Zone 2 Neighbourhood Residential Zone 3 Public Park & Recreation Zone Public Use Zone_Education Public Use Zone_Local Government Public Use Zone_Service & Utilities Public Use Zone_Transport Residential Growth Zone 1 Residential Growth Zone 3 Special Use Zone 5 Special Use Zone 6
44
45
MONASH | GREENSPACES_
Undefined Reserve
Park
Open Space
Waterbodies
46
47
MONASH | SPORTING & RECREATION_
Golf Course
Hockey Ground
Netball Court
Sportsground Tennis Court
48
49
MONASH | AMENITIES_
Bank
Education
Grocery
Medical
Petrol Station Post Office
Newsagent
50
51
MONASH | CULTURAL_
Places of Worship
Hairdressers/Barbers
Playground/Park
Sports/Recreation
52
53
LGA | DANDENONG_
54
55
DANDENONG | POPULATION DENSITY_
56
57
DANDENONG | DWELLING DENSITY_
58
59
DANDENONG | PLANNING SCHEME ZONES_ Commercial Zone 1
Commercial Zone 2
Comprehensive Development Zone 1
Comprehensive Development Zone 2 General Residential Zone 1
General Residential Zone 2 General Residential Zone 3 Industrial Zone 1 Industrial Zone 3 Mixed Use Zone Neighbourhood Residential Zone 1 Public Conservation & Resource Zone Public Park & Recreation Zone Public Use Zone_Cemetery/Crematorium Public Use Zone_Education Public Use Zone_Health & Community Public Use Zone_Local Government Public Use Zone_Service & Utility Public Use Zone_Transport
60
Residential Growth Zone 1 Residential Growth Zone 2 Special Use Zone 1 Special Use Zone 3 Urban Floodway Zone
61
DANDENONG | GREENSPACES_
Reserve
Gardens
Park
Open Space
Waterbodies
62
63
DANDENONG | SPORTING & RECREATION_
Athletic Field Dog Track
Hockey Ground Horse Track
Motor Track
Netball Court Racecourse
Sportsground
Sportsground
64
65
DANDENONG | AMENITIES_
Bank
Education
Grocery
Medical
Petrol Station Post Office
Newsagent
66
67
DANDENONG | CULTURAL_
Places of Worship
Hairdressers/Barbers
Playground/Park
Sports/Recreation
68
69
LGA | CASEY_
70
71
CASEY | POPULATION DENSITY_
72
73
CASEY | DWELLING DENSITY_
74
75
CASEY | PLANNING SCHEME ZONES_ Commercial Zone 1
Commercial Zone 2 Farming Zone 1
Farming Zone 2
General Residential Zone 1 General Residential Zone 2 Industrial Zone 3 Low Density Residential Zone 2 Mixed Use Zone Public Park & Recreation Zone Public Use Zone_Education Public Use Zone_Health & Community Public Park & Recreation Zone Public Use Zone_Cemetery/Crematorium Public Use Zone_Education Public Use Zone_Health & Community Public Use Zone_Local Government Public Use Zone_Service & Utility Public Use Zone_Transport
76
Residential Growth Zone 2 Urban Floodway Zone Urban Growth Zone 14 Urban Growth Zone 3 Urban Growth Zone 9
77
CASEY | GREENSPACES_
Reserve
Conservation Park
Gardens Park
Open Space
Waterbodies
78
79
CASEY | SPORTING & RECREATION_
Skate Park
Bowling Green
Golf Course
Netball Court
Sportsground Tennis Court Undefined
80
81
CASEY | AMENITIES_
Bank
Education
Grocery
Medical
Petrol Station Post Office
Newsagent
82
83
CASEY | CULTURAL_
Places of Worship
Hairdressers/Barbers
Playground/Park
Sports/Recreation
84
85
LGA | CARDINIA_
86
87
CARDINIA | POPULATION DENSITY_
88
89
CARDINIA | DWELLING DENSITY_
90
91
CARDINIA | PLANNING SCHEME ZONES_ Commercial Zone 1
Comprehensive Development Zone 1
Comprehensive Development Zone 2
Comprehensive Development Zone 3 Farming Zone 1
Farming Zone 2 General Residential Zone 1 Green Wedge Zone 2 Green Wedge Zone 1 Industrial Zone 1 Low Density Residential Zone 2 Mixed Use Zone Public Conservation & Resource Zone Public Park & Recreation Zone Public Use Zone_Education Public Use Zone_Health & Community Public Use Zone_Local Government Public Use Zone_Other Public Use Public Use Zone_Service & Utility Public Use Zone_Transport
92
Rural Living Zone 1 Special Use Zone 1 Special Use Zone 3 Urban Floodway Zone Urban Growth Zone 1 Urban Growth Zone 3 Urban Growth Zone 4
93
CARDINIA | GREENSPACES_
Reserve
Conservation Park
Gardens Park
Open Space Waterbodies
94
95
CARDINIA | SPORTING & RECREATION_
Undefined
Skate Park
Athletic Field
Bowling Green Golf Course
Horse Track
Netball Court Racecourse
Sportsground Tennis Court
Training Track
96
97
CARDINIA | AMENITIES_
Bank
Education
Grocery
Medical
Petrol Station Post Office
Newsagent
98
99
CARDINIA | CULTURAL_
Places of Worship
Hairdressers/Barbers
Playground/Park Caravan Park
Sports/Recreation
100
101
102
MONASH | SUBURBS
DANDENONG | SUBURBS
Ashwood Burwood Chadstone Clayton Glen Waverley Hughesdale Huntingdale Monash University Mount Waverley Mulgrave Notting Hill Oakleigh Oakleigh East Oakleigh South Wheelers Hill
Dandenong Dandenong North Dandenong South Keysborough Noble Park Noble Park North Springvale - 1827 Springvale South Lyndhurst Bangholme
CASEY | SUBURBS
CARDINIA | SUBURBS
Berwick Botanic Ridge Clyde Clyde North Cranbourne Cranbourne East Cranbourne North Cranbourne West Cranbourne South Doveton Endeavour Hills Eumemmerring Hallam Hampton Park Junction Village Lynbrook Narre Warren Narre Warren North Narre Warren South Blind Bight Cannons Creek Devon Meadows Harkaway Lysterfield South Peacedale Tooradin Warneet
Beaconsfield Emerald Officer Pakenham Avonsleigh Bayles Beaconsfield Upper Bunyip Bunyip North Caldermeade Cardinia Catani Clematis Cockatoo Cora Lynn Dalmore Dewhurst Garfield Garfield North Gembrook Guys Hill Heath Hill Iona Koo Wee Rup Koo Wee Rup North Lang Lang Lang Lang East Longwarry Maryknoll
Meckenzies Creek Modella Monomeith Mount Burnett Nangana Nar Nar Goon Nar Nar Goon North Nyora Officer South Pakenham South Pakenham Upper Rythdale Tonimbuk Tooradin North Tynong Tynong North Vervale Yannathan
103
PRECEDENT STUDIES_
Greening the Greyfields | Maroondah City Council
104
PRECEDENT STUDIES_
Missing Middle Housing | Opticos
105
PRECEDENT STUDIES_
Paris’ 15 minute neighbourhood
106
107
108
FUTURE HOMES MASSING / YIELD STUDIES_ In week two, those of us who were interesting in entering the IBA Melbourne’s Future Homes Student Competition [FHSC] were tasked with a massing/yield studies exercise in order for us to start thinking about the site constraints/opportunities of the competition. The competition has 3 site scenarios depending on the lot arrangement: 2 Lot amalgation, 3 lot amalgamation & 4 Lot amalgamation. In order to find out what areas of these lots were could build on we had to reference Clause 54 & Clause 55 of the VPP, along with the ResCode in order to outline the building envelopes of all of these scenarios. I found this, a really insightful task as I had not worked with residential architecture and its regulations in a really long time, and I had never worked with residential architecture regulations within the Melbourne context. This task also gave insight as to the yield return for this competition, allowing us, as a class, to come to the realisation that the yield that can be obtained from these scenarios is far more than outlined in the competition, yet at the same time ResCode disparages yield in terms of height/storey potentials.
109
2 LOT AMALGAMATION_
BUILDING ENVELOPE TOTAL BUILDABLE AREA
110
MAX. BUILDING HEIGHT 13.5M
MAX. 3 STOREYS
111
3 LOT AMALGAMATION_
BUILDING ENVELOPE TOTAL BUILDABLE AREA
112
MAX. BUILDING HEIGHT 13.5M
MAX. 3 STOREYS
113
4 LOT AMALGAMATION_
BUILDING ENVELOPE TOTAL BUILDABLE AREA
114
MAX. BUILDING HEIGHT 13.5M
MAX. 3 STOREYS
115
MASSING STUDIES_ 5BA
4BA
3BA
2BA
1BA STUDIO
116
OPEN SPACE
A/C SPACE
SHARED SPACE
STUDIO
1 BED
2 BED
3 BED
4 BED
MAX. 10%
MAX. 30%
MAX. 50%
MIN. 50%
MIN. 50%
5 BED MIN. 50%
Room 1.5 m²
Room 2.5 m²
Communal Area
BED
BED
BED
BED
BED
9.0 m²
9.0 m²
9.0 m²
9.0 m²
9.0 m²
30.0 m²
KITCHEN & DINING 10600
8.0 m²
BED
BED
STUDIO INTERIOR
LIVING AREAS
35.0 m²
33.0 m²
9.0 m²
LIVING AREAS
BED
9.0 m²
LIVING AREAS
43.2 m²
KITCHEN & DINING
BED
9.0 m²
9.0 m²
LIVING AREAS
43.2 m²
LIVING AREAS
43.2 m²
43.2 m²
BED
BED
BED
9.0 m²
9.0 m²
9.0 m²
14.0 m²
GROUND OPEN SPACE
GROUND OPEN SPACE
GROUND OPEN SPACE
3.0 m²
3.0 m²
3.0 m²
KITCHEN & DINING 9.0 m²
BED
BED
9.0 m²
9.0 m²
GROUND OPEN SPACE
8.0 m²
BALCONY
8.0 m²
8.0 m²
KITCHEN & DINING 26.0 m²
SURROUNDING ROOF ANGLES
BED 3.0 m²
BALCONY
8.0 m²
3.0 m²
GROUND OPEN SPACE
BALCONY
GROUND OPEN SPACE
9.0 m²
KITCHEN & DINING 37.2 m²
BALCONY 12.0 m²
BALCONY
15.00°
22.50°
12.0 m²
BALCONY 12.0 m²
117
BUILDING FOOTPRINT STUDIES_ 80% = 20% PERMIABILITY ACROSS SITE
4900
LEVEL 02 BOUNDARY ENVELOPE
1M REAR & SIDE BOUNDARY OFFSET ENVELOPE
Room 139.2 m²
= 25.5% PERMIABILITY ACROSS SITE
Room 479.5 m²
13100
28400
LEVEL 01 BOUNDARY ENVELOPE 36600
9645
Room 319.7 m²
200MM REAR & SIDE BOUNDARY OFFSET ENVELOPE
33145
= 18% PERMIABILITY ACROSS SITE
14100
Room 527.3 m²
37400
15100
PARCEL AREA
Room 643.3 m²
42600
118
119
120
MAPPING DISCUSSIONS_ In our second week of this semester, we were given a number of choices for areas to investigate as an introduction to the context of Metropolitan Melbourne. My group, which comprised of Emma Barrett, Paris Triantis, Arsen Sarkisian, Melkamnesh Johnstone, Corina Wong, Kate Alder, Snehal Khadtare, Rafael Miranda, and myself [and Jane Witham for a day], looked to the macro scale analysis of Melbourne and all of the different contextual elements that make up the city. These elements were: LOT SIZES, HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT, LAND USE ZONING, PUBLIC TRANSPORT NETWORK / PPTN, PUBLIC OPEN SPACE, CYCLING AND ACCESSIBILITY, WALKABILITY, FOOD ACCESS & FOOD DESERTS & COMMUTING - JOURNEYS TO WORK. We then broke off into smaller groups to investigate each of these elements [however, still all sharing information gathered] so that we could get a cohesive insight as to Melbourn’e current Urban Realm. The areas I investigated were LAND USE ZONING, and then PUBLIC OPEN SPACE with Rafael. I also helped gather GIS data as to help in the investigation of the other elements. I loved this exercise as not only did it really give greater understanding as to the context and scope we are working with this semester, it should help me out with future projects and units.
121
Which employment generating land use zones attract relatively low densities of jobs?
LAND USE ZONE | TYPICAL ZONES IN CENTRES NEAR TRANSPORT NODES_ The C1Z is used as a mechanism to protect commercial uses at ground level to activate the ground plane. This is achieved by restricting residential uses at ground level
Commercial 1 Zone (C1Z) Mixed Use Zone (MUZ)
122
123
Which employment generating land use zones attract relatively low densities of jobs?
LAND USE ZONE | RESIDENTIAL ZONES_ Residential Zones (including MUZ) enable residential uses at ground level. Ground level apartments can often create inactivation in streets due to tall fences around private open space, so they need to be designed in creative ways to create street activation, especially on walking routes to and from PT stations.
Rural Living Zone (RLZ) General Residential Zone (GRZ) Low Density Residential Zone (LDRZ) Neighbourhood Residential Zone (NRZ) Residential Growth Zone (RGZ) Mixed Use Zone (MUZ)
124
125
How does the distribution of land use zones relate to the public transport network in general and the PPTN in particular?
LAND USE ZONE | HEIGHT LIMITS_ The C1Z and MUZ don’t have height limits & therefore are flexible when it comes to achieving higher density built form outcomes
Commercial 1 Zone (C1Z) Mixed Use Zone (MUZ)
126
127
How does the distribution of land use zones relate to the public transport network in general and the PPTN in particular?
LAND USE ZONE | PLANNING SCHEME OVERLAYS_ The C1Z and MUZ are often paired with a built form overlay control (e.g. DDO or DPO)
Design & Development Overlay (DDO) Development Plan Overlay (DPO)
128
129
How does the distribution of land use zones relate to the public transport network in general and the PPTN in particular?
LAND USE ZONE | ACTIVITY CENTRE ZONES_ The Activity Centre Zone (ACZ) is unique because it is a hybrid of land use and built form controls, but can be unnecessarily complex.
Activity Centre Zone Schedule 1 (ACZ1) Activity Centre Zone Schedule 2 (ACZ2) Activity Centre Zone Schedule 3 (ACZ3)
130
131
How does the distribution of land uses zones relate to the range of lot sizes?
LAND USE ZONE | LAND USE DISTRIBUTION X LOT SIZES_ Large development sites (e.g. Council carparks near train stations) are often zoned in a zone that offers flexibility. This includes the C1Z, MUZ or Residential Growth Zone (RGZ). The type of zone can often depend on what the Council envisages for the site.
Commercial 1 Zone (C1Z) Mixed Use Zones (MUZ) Residential Growth Zones (RGZ)
132
133
Which employment generating land use zones attract relatively high densities of jobs?
LAND USE ZONE | EMPLOYMENT GENERATION_ The Commercial 2 Zone or the (new) Commercial 3 Zone attract high density office towers. An example of this is Cremorne, where the office tower market is (or was until Covid-19 hit) going gangbusters. Similarly in parts of Collingwood.
Commercial 2 Zone (C2Z)
134
135
Which employment generating land use zones attract relatively low densities of jobs?
LAND USE ZONE | EMPLOYMENT GENERATION_ Typically the C1Z, or the ACZ enable residential uses above ground floor which is commonly the more commercially viable option than trying to coax employment uses upstairs. Moreland is an example of a Council that has built specific provisions into their activity centres to create more employment above ground level. But it is difficult to get retail to take off above ground level, so this is typically office type uses.
Activity Centre Zones (ACZ) Commercial 1 Zone (C1Z)
136
137
How do different land use zones attract visitations other than employees?
LAND USE ZONE | EMPLOYMENT GENERATION_ Land zones that enable active uses at ground floor (e.g. retail) stimulate street activity. Other zones such as community uses (schools etc) can stimulate high volumes of people at particular times of the day.
138
139
Which employment generating land use zones attract large volumes of road traffic?
LAND USE ZONE | ROAD TRAFFIC MITIGATION_ It depends on the land use or the business, more so than the zone. Most if not all employment generating land use zones enable developments that generate traffic in different ways - large format retail, shopping centres, shopping strip centres with on street parking. The type of development that takes depends on the size, location and opportunities of the land.
140
141
OPEN SPACES | CLASSIFICATIONS_
TYPES ACCESS LEVELS CATCHMENT
142
OPEN SPACES | TYPES_
PUBLIC OPEN SPACE Parks and gardens Civic squares and promenades Natural and semi-natural open space Sportsfields and organised recreation Recreation corridor Median parks Conservation reserves / protected areas
RESTRICTED PUBLIC LAND (with open space potential)
Services and utilities reserve Government schools Tertiary institutions Cemeteries Transport reservations Public golf courses Public race courses Sportsfields and orgnaised recreation Public housing reserves Natural and semi-natural open space Conservation reserves / protected areas
PRIVATE OPEN SPACE Non government schools Private sportsfields Private golf courses Private race courses Private conservation Private outdoor shopping centre forecourts / plazas / malls
143
OPEN SPACES | ACCESS LEVELS_
OPEN ACCESS
Freely accessible by the public all of the time.
LIMITED ACCESS
Access is free of charge but may be managed in some way, such as designated opening days / hours.
HIGHLY LIMITED ACCESS
Access is more significantly restricted by fees and charges and/ or barrier fencing
CLOSED ACCESS
144
Access is not possible by the public most of the time.
REGIONAL NETWORK
LOCAL NETWORK
OPEN SPACES | BY CATCHMENT_
TYPES
AREA
CATCHMENT
Less than 0.2ha
200m-400m
NEIGHBOURHOODS
0.2-1ha
400m
COMMUNITY
1.0-5.0ha
800m
DISTRICT
5-15ha
1200m
MUNICIPAL
15-50ha
> 0-5km
METROPOLITAN
Greater than 50ha
up to 15km
145
OPEN SPACES | CATEGORIES_
Cemeteries Civic Squares & Promenades Conservation Reserves Government Schools Natural & Semi-Natural Open Spaces Non-Government Schools Parks & Gardens Recreation Corridors Services & Utilities Reserves Sportsfields & Organised Recreation Tertiary Institutions Transport Reservations
Public Housing Reserves
146
147
OPEN SPACES | SCALES_
Community District Metropolitan Municipal Neighbourhood Pocket
148
149
OPEN SPACES | ACCESSIBILITY_
Closed Highly Limited Limited Open Open Space 400m Walkable Catchment
150
151
OPEN SPACES | TYPES_
Private Open Space Public Open Space Restricted Public Land
152
153
OPEN SPACES | SCALES_
Community District Metropolitan Municipal Neighbourhood Pocket Pocket 200m Catchment Neighbourhood 400m Catchment District 1200m Catchment
Community 800m Catchment
154
155
How accessible are the types of public open space, and to whom? (i.e. how does demography relate to access?)
OPEN SPACES | SNAMUTS_ The composite index provides an overview of public transport accessibility, combining the results of the closeness centrality, degree centrality, contour catchment, nodal betweenness, nodal resilience and nodal connectivity indicators in a comprehensive visualisation.
Composite Accessibility Index
156
157
SOIL TYPES | SOIL CLASSIFICATIONS_
Calcarosols (CA) Chromosols (CH) Dermosols (DE) Ferrosols (FE) Hydrosols (HY) Kandosols (KA) Kurosols (KU) Anthroposols (AN) Organosols (OR) Podosols (PO) Sodosols (SO) Tenosols (TE) Vertosols (VE)
158
159
URBAN GROWTH AREAS | URBAN EXTENT_
1883 1927 1954 1971 2001 2015 Growth Area Boundary
160
161
162
FUTURE’S WHEEL_ In Week 4, we had a visit from a very special guest lecturer: Bridgette Engeler. Bridgette is a Futurist at Swinburne, and she came and gave us a workshopping class in order to introduce us to greyfield briefings, and more importantly the future’s wheel. This was an amazing workshop as it delineated that we don’t know the future, and should not design with the assumption that we do [which is incredibly true given the current state of the world]. She also introduced us to 3 types of future scenarios within this future’s wheel: The Pyramid, Leviathan & The Village. From here my group, Megan Murray, Arsen Sarkisian, Paris Triantis and myself, sticky noted us what we think the impact that a pandemic has on the 20-minute city strategy. After this workshop, my group continued on with this notion, and investigated through sketches, collages and SWOT/PESTEL analyses, what these future’s really mean and what these could look like, in addition to looking at what the business as usual fuuture and a utopian city future could look like.
163
IMPACT OF PANDEMIC ON THE 20-MINUTE CITY_ The Futures Wheel [aka Impacts Wheel or Implications Wheel] was created by Jerome Glenn to identify impacts and consequences of trends or events. It’s sometimes used in decision making, because it reveals connections and dependencies as well as [unintended] consequences of choices and options.
The central term is placed in the centre of the sheet, board or frame. This could be a change, event, trend, ‘impact’ or possible solution to a problem. By identifying this central term, it is clear to all participants what the starting point of this wheel is.
164
165
THE PYRAMID_ • Governments enable policies that benefit the rich and there is political inequality. • Poverty and violence increases. • Gangs, protests and organised crimes flourish. • Governments crack down with extreme measures and totalitarian control enacted through the military.
166
167
THE PYRAMID_
168
169
LETHIATHAN_ • An explosion of bottom up solutions with active government support. • Next gen regeneration projects • Path to recovery laid out with emphasis on personal sacrifice. • Reduced personal freedoms and higher taxation come about as a result.
170
171
LETHIATHAN_
172
173
THE VILLAGE_ • Ineffective state response. • Community bands together to fill the void. • Local market and DIY solutions. • We get to spend more time with family and friends but become poorer.
174
175
THE VILLAGE_
176
177
THE VILLAGE | BEE KEEPING_ Previous steps to honey harvesting:
Benefits:
1. Put on protective suit
Hive utilises gravity to drain honey
2. Prepare a smoker to sedate the bees
BPA free plastic frame has partly formed honeycomb cells
3.break the hive open
which gives the bee’s a starting point to fill the frames with
4. Pull out the frames whilst trying not to squash the bees
honey (their home isn’t totally destroyed each harvest).
5. Use a leaf blower to blow the bee’s away from the frames
Designed so that bees don’t get crushed by the frames
6. Brush remaining bee’s off the honeycomb
clear observation window so you can check on your hive health.
7. transfer frames to a processing shed 8. cut the wax off 9. filter the honey into a drainer 10. clean up the mess (dead bees) 11. transfer the frames back to the hives for the bees to rebuild
Harvesting honey using a Honey Flow Frame: 1. look to see when the frames are full 2. plug in a tap to an individual frame to collect the honey
178
179
THE VILLAGE | SOLAR FACADES_
180
Zig Zag Solar • Angled to capture the suns rays at diffferent times of the day • “Increases electricity yield by up to 30%” • These type of facades are often referred to as ‘Building-Integrated Photovoltaics (BIPV) of 496 BIPV systems installed in Brazil “87% of the BIPV systems had an electricity generation output greater than 95%” (Lai. M, Hakoi. S, 2015) .
Maintenance Strategies “Just four grams of dust per one square metre of a solar cell’s surface can reduce its energy output by 40%,” (energy matters) Adding a hydrophobic film enhances the ability of water falling onto the panel to pick up dust a residue.
181
THE VILLAGE | INTEGRATED WATER RE-USE SYSTEMS_ The Water Tank House, ARM Architecture (Port Melbourne) • 3 storey house where black water treatment system supplies vertical planting. • 19 water tanks integrated into the facade holding a combined 38 000 litres used for toilet flushing and garden water. • Thermal mass of the tanks mitigate temperature fluctuations on the interior. • The facade includes an integrated gro-wall (https://atlantiscorporation.com.au) 2015
182
2019
183
BUSINESS AS USUAL_ • Urban sprawl reaches a point where the whole east coast of Australia is one giant city • Decisions and technological advancements have so much political interference that nothing ever changes. • The central regions of Australia are just a vast wasteland of depleted natural resources
184
185
BUSINESS AS USUAL_
186
187
UTOPIAN CITY_ • magnetised public transport • equal society • Egalitarian society • More women in positions of power • Gender neutral amenity, services and systems • Almost zero rates of crime globally • Vaccines for almost all viruses and diseases • Everyone commutes on sustainable Public Transport, by foot or by bike • Underground waste management system
Tubes and pipes connecting to chutes at ground level for soft plastics etc.
Repurposed as outdoor furniture, clothing, other products etc.
Industrial (massive) 3D printers turning recycled waste into products
• Better global resource management, ensuring no one goes hungry, everyone has an adequate home and everyone has access to adequate amenity and healthcare • Teleportation or super fast international transit (maglev, like in Finding Nemo with the underwater jetstream for fast travel haha)
188
189
BEST CASE_
190
WORST CASE_
191
192
RESEARCH PLANNING FRAMEWORK_ The group that was formed in week 4’s Future Wheel’s workshop, Megan Murray, Arsen Sarkisian, Paris Triantis and myself, has amalgamated into the group that I will be working with for the rest of the semester. On this basis, the next progression in this studio was to investigate further the potential topic that we wanted to focus on in line with the FHSC and 20 minute neighbourhoods. As part of this Research Planning Framework, we looked at the demographic/socio economic contexts of Melbourne, and came up with a focal topic of Social Housing. The reason behind this is that from our research, we found links between walkability of different areas and the prevalence of socio economic disadvantage and health conditions like Type 2 Diabetes, and cardiovascular disease. From here we also identified 3 key LGAs for us to use as case studies for our mid-semester presentation: Brimbank, Dandenong and Hume, as each of these areas showed a high prevalence of Type 2 Diabetes and a demographic who had low socio-economic communities, in addition to low walkability/liveability findings.
193
MELBOURNES CURRENT SOCIAL HOUSING SOLUTIONS_ “The Housing Commission of Victoria was established under the Housing Act 1937” “The Slum Reclamation Act 1938 and the Reclamation and Housing (Financial) Act 1938 provided the framework for the Commission’s work”. The Victorian Public Tenants Association now looks after the interests of those living in public housing in the state.
PRIMARY REASONS WHY PEOPLE NEED TO ACCESS SOCIAL HOUSING_ • Current accommodation is inadequate or unsuitable • Employment or family reasons • Financial stress Homelessness • Household composition • Medical or other special need • Neighbourhood or safety issues Tenancy ending/eviction • Unable to access alternative housing
194
- Ministry of Social Development
195
DWELLING DENSITY_
0
196
152,350,966
197
POPULATION DENSITY_
0
198
434,927
199
HEAT VULNERABILITY INDEX_ High-risk areas with Heat Vulnerability Index (HVI) 5 were mainly distributed in the suburban areas of Melton, Brimbank, Darebin, Casey, Wyndham LGAs. The risks in some areas were high, despite the lower magnitude of UHI, because of the high human sensitivity or lower adaptive capability to heat, such as the SA1s in north Dandenong & Casey.
1 2 3 4 5
200
201
LOT SIZES | TOUCHING WITHIN PPTN_
12,043 | <1 x 633-653m2 Touching Lots 400m Buffer | Primary Public Transport Network
202
203
SEIFA | INDEX OF ECONOMIC RESOURCES_
732
204
1,143
205
SEIFA | INDEX OF EDUCATION & OCCUPATION_
830
206
1,204
207
SEIFA | INDEX OF RELATIVE SOCIO-ECONOMIC DISADVANTAGE_
43
208
2,151
209
SEIFA | INDEX OF RELATIVE SOCIO-ECONOMIC DISADVANTAGE_
1
210
454
211
NATSEM | MIGRATION RATE_
1
212
454
213
NATSEM | INDIGENOUS INDICATORS_
0
214
387
215
NATSEM | EQUIVALISED HOUSEHOLD INCOME_
520
216
1,491
217
NATSEM | GINI COEFFICIENT_
0.255
218
0.416
219
NATSEM | UNEMPLOYMENT RATE_
0%
220
19.69%
221
NATSEM | EMPLOYMENT RATE_
0%
222
100%
223
VISFA | NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS 2016_
76
224
44,447
225
VISFA | HOUSEHOLD TYPES 2016_
2% 2% Group
Other Family
House
Couple Family with Children
17%
Lone House
41%
34056
2% 4% Group
Other Family
24%
35%
Couple Family with Children
22816
24%
Couple Family without Children Parent
14%
226
House
Parent
13%
Lone House
22%
Couple Family without Children
2% 4% Group
Other Family
House
37%
Couple Family with Children
2% 4% Group
21%
Lone House
14%
22%
Couple Family without Children
House
20%
36%
Couple Family without Children
31986 Parent
Other Family
36499 Parent
16%
Lone House
22%
Couple Family with Children
227
VISFA | NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS 2021_
73
228
58,644
229
VISFA | HOUSEHOLD TYPES 2021_
2% 2% Group
Other Family
House
18%
Lone House
39%
Couple Family with Children
35877
2% 4% Group
Other Family
25%
24%
35%
Couple Family with Children
24709
Couple Family without Children Parent
14%
230
House
Parent
13%
Lone House
22%
Couple Family without Children
2% 4% Group
Other Family
House
37%
Couple Family with Children
2% 4% Group
21%
Lone House
14%
22%
Couple Family without Children
House
20%
37%
Couple Family with Children
34794 Parent
Other Family
39165 Parent
16%
Lone House
21%
Couple Family without Children
231
VISFA | NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS 2026_
68
232
72,011
233
VISFA | HOUSEHOLD TYPES 2026_
1% 2% Group
Other Family
House
Couple Family with Children
19%
Lone House
38%
37520
2% 4% Group
Other Family
26%
24%
36%
Couple Family with Children
26513
Couple Family without Children Parent
14%
234
House
Parent
13%
Lone House
21%
Couple Family without Children
2% 4% Group
Other Family
House
38%
Couple Family with Children
2% 4% Group
21%
Lone House
14%
21%
Couple Family without Children
House
20%
37%
Couple Family with Children
36876 Parent
Other Family
41284 Parent
16%
Lone House
21%
Couple Family without Children
235
VISFA | NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS 2031_
60
236
83,995
237
VISFA | HOUSEHOLD TYPES 2031_
1% 2% Group
Other Family
House
Couple Family with Children
21%
Lone House
37%
39059
2% 4% Group
Other Family
25%
24%
35%
Couple Family with Children
28588
Couple Family without Children Parent
14%
238
House
Parent
14%
Lone House
21%
Couple Family without Children
2% 3% Group
Other Family
House
38%
Couple Family with Children
2% 4% Group
21%
Lone House
15%
21%
Couple Family without Children
House
21%
36%
Couple Family with Children
39117 Parent
Other Family
43893 Parent
16%
Lone House
21%
Couple Family without Children
239
SCHOOLS | TYPES_
Language Primary/Secondary Primary Secondary Special
240
241
SCHOOLS | SYSTEMS_
Catholic Government Independent
242
243
ACCESS SCORE | NON-WORK_
0-10 10-20 20-30 30-40 40-50 50-60 60-70 70-80 80-90 90-100
244
245
MELBOURNE HOUSING MARKET | LANDSIZES_
633-653m2
246
247
MELBOURNE HOUSING MARKET | LANDSIZES_
$0
248
$ 4,750,000
249
JOURNEYS TO WORK | DONâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;T GO TO WORK_
0
250
2,206
251
JOURNEYS TO WORK | TOTAL_
12
252
13,914
253
JOURNEYS TO WORK | % PTV_
0%
254
51%
255
JOURNEYS TO WORK | % PRIVATE VEHICLES_
51%
256
71%
257
JOURNEYS TO WORK | % MIX MODE_
0%
258
22%
259
JOURNEYS TO WORK | % WALK ONLY_
0%
260
41%
261
NATSEM | GINI COEFFICIENT_
Urban Extent 2015 Study LGAs
0.255
262
0.416
263
DANDENONG | PLANNING SCHEME ZONES_ Commercial Zone 1
Commercial Zone 2
Comprehensive Development Zone 1
Comprehensive Development Zone 2 Farming Zone
General Residential Zone 1 General Residential Zone 2 General Residential Zone 3 Green Wedge A Zone Green Wedge Zone Industrial Zone 1
264
Public Park & Recreation Zone Public Use Zone - Cemetery / Crematorium Public Use Zone - Education Public Use Zone - Health & Community Public Use Zone - Local Government
Industrial Zone 2
Public Use Zone - Other Public Use
Industrial Zone 3
Public Use Zone - Transport
Mixed Use Zone
Residential Growth Zone 1
Neighbourhood Residential Zone 1
Residential Growth Zone 2
Neighbourhood Residential Zone 4
Special Use Zones
Public Conservation & Resource Zone
Urban Floodway Zone
265
DANDENONG | BUSINESS ACTIVITIES_
891 223 42 3
266
Retail Offices Factories / Warehouses Adult
267
DANDENONG | EXISTING FACILITIES_
1
5
Museum
Associations
3
2
Art Centres
Cinemas
11
7
Childcares
6
5
Muslim
1
1
Sikhism Cofucian
Community Centres
Employment Agencies
6
Buddhism
4
6
10 Government
Courthouses
Offices
4
Fire Stations
11
Social Facilities
3
58 68 9
268
Libraries
8
151 32
20
Cultural Social Infrastructure Places of Worship Government Health
Kindegartens
Christianity
41
4
Townhalls
13
Hearing Aids Opticians
Chemists
7
Theatres
1
Funeral Directors
5
Clinics
20
Doctors Police
76
8 Hospitals
Dentists
25
269
DANDENONG | EXISTING AMENITIES_
11 330 11 41 45 3 45 39
270
Bars / Pubs Cafes / Restaurants Hotels Fuel Moneys Services Newsagencies Pharmacies / Chemists Post
271
DANDENONG | EXISTING FOOD SOURCES_
173 20 11 37 49 88 61 8 8
272
Fastfood Alcohol Beverages Butchers / Deli Bakery Convenience Supermarkets Seafood / Fishmungers Greengrocers / Markets
273
DANDENONG | OPEN SPACE CATEGORIES_
Cemeteries Civic Squares & Promenades Conservation Reserves Government Schools Natural & Semi-Natural Open Spaces Non-Government Schools Parks & Gardens Recreation Corridors Services & Utilities Reserves Sportsfields & Organised Recreation Tertiary Institutions Transport Reservations
274
275
DANDENONG | OPEN SPACE TYPES_
Private Open Space Public Open Space Restricted Public Land
276
277
DANDENONG | OPEN SPACE ACCESSIBILITY_
Closed Highly Limited Limited Open Open Space 400m Walkable Catchment
278
279
DANDENONG | OPEN SPACE SCALES_
Community District Metropolitan Municipal Neighbourhood Pocket
280
281
DANDENONG | OPEN SPACE SCALES WITH VPA BUFFER_
Community District Metropolitan Municipal Neighbourhood Pocket Pocket 200m Catchment Neighbourhood 400m Catchment District 1200m Catchment
Community 800m Catchment
282
283
DANDENONG | WALKABILITY_ MODE OF TRANSPORT TO WORK (ABS, 2016)
Other
Cycling
Walking
45.4 Walkscore FHSC Lots PPTN
Urban Growth Extent
284
Public Transport
Private Vehicle
285
KEY SBO RO UG
H
ND ENO NG
DA
NO BLE
ALE PA RK
SPR ING V
BRIMBANK | PLANNING SCHEME ZONES_ Activity Centre Zone 1 Commercial Zone 1
Commercial Zone 2
Commonwealth Land not Controlled by Planning Scheme Comprehensive Development Zone 1
Comprehensive Development Zone 2 General Residential Zone 1 General Residential Zone 2 General Residential Zone3 Green Wedge A Zone Green Wedge Zone
286
Public Park & Resource Zone Public Use Zone - Cemetery / Crematorium Public Use Zone - Education Public Use Zone - Health & Community Public Use Zone - Local Government
Industrial Zone 1
Public Use Zone - Other Public Use
Industrial Zone 2
Public Use Zone - Service & Utility
Industrial Zone 3
Public Use Zone - Transport
Mixed Use Zone
Residential Growth Zone 1
Neighbourhood Residential Zone 1
Rural Conservation Zone
Neighbourhood Residential Zone 2
Special Use Zones
Public Conservation & Resource Zone
Urban Floodway Zone
287
BRIMBANK | BUSINESS ACTIVITIES_
378 99 22
288
Retail Offices Factories / Warehouses
289
BRIMBANK | EXISTING FACILITIES_
9
Social Facilities
2
Cinemas
1
Charities
1
Events Venues
25 72
290
7
Social Infrastructure Places of Worship Government Health
Fire Stations
20
27
Christianity
23
8
Hospitals
Clinics
8
Hospitals
2
Libraries
Cultural
10
Government Buildings
Community Centres
Kindergartens
30
1
Buddhism
10
3
54
Muslim
7
Nursing Homes
5
2
6
Childcares
Courthouses
2
Ambulance
4
Police
9
Doctors
17
Dentists
291
BRIMBANK | EXISTING AMENITIES_
13 197 6 46 27 3 25 24
292
Bars / Pubs Cafes / Restaurants Hotels Fuel Moneys Services Newsagencies Pharmacies / Chemists Post
293
BRIMBANK | EXISTING FOOD SOURCES_
130 11 7 12 16 17 2 44 3 6
294
Fastfood Alcohol Beverages Butchers / Deli Bakery Convenience Milkbars / Dairy Supermarkets Seafood / Fishmungers Greengrocers / Markets
295
BRIMBANK | OPEN SPACE CATEGORIES_
Cemeteries Civic Squares & Promenades Conservation Reserves Government Schools Natural & Semi-Natural Open Spaces Non-Government Schools Parks & Gardens Recreation Corridors Services & Utilities Reserves Sportsfields & Organised Recreation Tertiary Institutions Transport Reservations
Public Housing Reserves
296
297
BRIMBANK | OPEN SPACE TYPES_
Private Open Space Public Open Space Restricted Public Land
298
299
BRIMBANK | OPEN SPACE ACCESSIBILITY_
Closed Highly Limited Limited Open Open Space 400m Walkable Catchment
300
301
BRIMBANK | OPEN SPACE SCALES_
Community District Metropolitan Municipal Neighbourhood Pocket
302
303
BRIMBANK | OPEN SPACE SCALES WITH VPA BUFFER_
Community District Metropolitan Municipal Neighbourhood Pocket Pocket 200m Catchment Neighbourhood 400m Catchment District 1200m Catchment
Community 800m Catchment
304
305
BRIMBANK | WALKABILITY MODE OF TRANSPORT TO WORK (ABS, 2016)
Other
Cycling
Walking
49.5 Walkscore FHSC Lots PPTN
Urban Growth Extent
306
Public Transport
Private Vehicle
307
DEE
K
AR
RP
SU
INE
NS H
ST
ALB AN S
TAY LOR SL
AK
ES
HUME | BUSINESS ACTIVITIES_
145 14 14
308
Retail Offices Factories / Warehouses
309
HUME | EXISTING FACILITIES_
7
2
3
Theatres
Studios
1
Social Facilities Charities
11
Childcares
9
5
4
Events Venues
12 57 18 34 39
310
16
12
3
Fire Stations
Townhalls
13
Cinemas
Community Centres
13
Christianity
Kindergartens
8
Social Infrastructure
Health
15
Clinics
14
Doctors
1
Cultural
Government
Opticians
Prison Police
Places of Worship
2
3
Hospitals
Government Buildings
Libraries
3
2
Courthouses
8
Muslim
5
Dentists
311
HUME | EXISTING AMENITIES_
13 197 6 46 27 3 25 24
312
Bars / Pubs Cafes / Restaurants Hotels Fuel Moneys Services Newsagencies Pharmacies / Chemists Post
313
HUME | EXISTING FOOD SOURCES_
138 9 1 2 5 33 28 2
314
Fastfood Alcohol
Beverages Butchers / Deli Bakery Convenience Supermarkets Greengrocers / Markets
315
HUME | OPEN SPACE CATEGORIES_
9 17 37 425 23 357
Cemeteries Conservation Reserves Government Schools Natural & Semi-Natural Open Spaces Non-Government Schools Parks & Gardens
476 26 102 8 254
Recreation Corridors Services & Utilities Reserves Sportsfields & Organised Recreation Tertiary Institutions Transport Reservations Urban Extent 2015
316
317
HUME | OPEN SPACE TYPES_
28 1333 373
Private Open Space Public Open Space Restricted Public Land Urban Extent 2015
318
319
HUME | OPEN SPACE ACCESSIBILITY_
107 51 26 803
Closed Highly Limited Limited Open Open Space 400m Walkable Catchment Urban Extent 2015
320
321
HUME | OPEN SPACE SCALES WITH VPA BUFFER_
177 58 12 18 251 787
Community District Metropolitan Municipal Neighbourhood Pocket Community 800m Catchment District 1200m Catchment Neighbourhood 400m Catchment Pocket 200m Catchment
322
323
HUME | WALKABILITY MODE OF TRANSPORT TO WORK (ABS, 2016)
Other
Cycling
Walking
35.6 Walkscore FHSC Lots PPTN
Urban Growth Extent
324
Public Transport
Private Vehicle
325
NE
UR
LBO
ME
OA D
BR
T
POR
AIR
ME AD
OW S
BU RN
NB UR Y
IGI E
CRA
SU
REFERENCES A-M_ • Anthes, E., 2020,“Everyone Has a Basic Right to Good Design”, Next City, [online],
and Housing: Commuting to Work - More Stories from the Census, 2016, 2016,
Available: https://nextcity.org/features/view/everyone-has-a-basic-right-to-good-
Australian Government, [online], Available: https://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.
design
nsf/Lookup/by%20Subject/2071.0.55.001~2016~Main%20Features~Feature%20 Article:%20Journey%20to%20Work%20in%20Australia~40
• AHUR,I 2018, ‘What is a Community Land Trust’, AHURI BRIEF, [online], Available: https://www.ahuri.edu.au/research/ahuri-briefs/what-is-a-community-land-trust
• Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2020, 2016 Census QuickStates: Greater
• AURIN, 2020, Australian Urban Research Infrastructure Network (AURIN) Portal
censusdata.abs.gov.au/census_services/getproduct/census/2016/
e-Infrastructure, National Collaborative Research Infrastructure Strategy, [online],
quickstat/2GMEL
Melbourne, Australian Government, [online], Available: https://quickstats.
Available: https://portal.aurin.org.au/ • Australian Bureau of Statistics, 4430.0 - Disability, Ageing and Carers, Australia: • Austral Plywoods, 2020, Austral AAA Marine, [online], Available: https://www.
Summary of Findings, 2015, Australian Government, [online], Available: https://
australply.com.au/austral-aaa-marine
www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/DetailsPage/4430.02015?OpenDocument
• Arnstein, S., 1969, A ladder of citizen participation, 35th edn, Journal of the
• Australian Human Rights Commission, 2015, Disability Discrimination, [online],
American Institute of Planners, pp. 216-224., Healey, P., Hillier, J. (2008) Foundation
Available: https://humanrights.gov.au/our-work/employers/disability-discrimination
of the Planning Enterprise: Critical essays in planning theory: Vol. 1, pp. 415-424 • Australian Human Rights Commission, Age Discrimination, 2014, [online], • ArchDaily, 2020, Materials & Products, [online], Available: https://www.archdaily.
Available: https://humanrights.gov.au/our-work/employers/age-discrimination
com/tag/materials • Australian Institute for Health and Welfare, 2020, Diabetes, Australian • Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2018, 2071.0.55.001 - Census of Population
Government, [online], Available: https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports-data/healthconditions-disability-deaths/diabetes/overview
i
• Australian Urban Observatory, 2020, Metadata, [online], Available: https://auo.org. au/portal/metadata/
• Berger, R. J., Lorenz, L. S., 2015, Disability and Qualitative Inquiry:
Methods for Rethinking an Ableist World, Google Books, pp. 109- [online], Available: https://books.google.com.au/books?hl=en&lr=&id=ZbW1C
• Baldwin, C., Stafford, L., 2017, Planning Walkable Neighborhoods: Are
wAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA109&dq=+%22institutional+resistance+to+
We Overlooking Diversity in Abilities and Ages?, Vol. 33. no. 1, Journal of
accessible+architecture+and+design%22+corroto&ots=m1-aEGeII-&s-
Planning Literature, [online], Available: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/
ig=lLuViAFl4kSSpWYBIrMmRf8BysE#v=onepage&q&f=false
abs/10.1177/0885412217704649 • Blue Sky Windows, 2020, Our Works, [online], Available: https://blueskywindows. • BCG Concrete, 2020, Exposed, Polished & Honed Concrete, [online], Available:
com.au/gallery/
http://www.bgcconcrete.com.au/assets/pdfs/concrete-mixes-brochure.pdf • Brimbank City Council, 2015, Ordinary Council Meeting Agenda - Officer Reports: • BCG Concrete, 2020, GreenStar Concrete, [online], Available: http://www.
Report 10.2, [online], Available: https://www.brimbank.vic.gov.au/sites/default/
bgcconcrete.com.au/assets/pdfs/greenstar-brochure.pdf
files/council_minutes/2015/73e843e1-9b9d-4510-a3fb-a4a00121f655/Report_2. pdf?fbclid=IwAR3MF3KdZELYRJl0zGbB5XXjewstu7BqHgRaVgB5Kni3vqKJQz_S5_
• Bedford, H., 2014, Out with the old, in with the new, Performance Property
aQCI4
Advisory, [online], Available: https://performanceproperty.com.au/2014/09/planmelbourne-2050/
• Brimbank [DELWP], 2020, Brimbank Planning Scheme: PLANNING SCHEME, Brimbank City Council, [online], Available: https://planning-schemes.api.delwp. vic.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0005/463937/Brimbank_PS_Ordinance.pdf?_ ga=2.187222120.1961358546.1604721443-601537736.1601626169
ii
• Brown, D., 2016, Striking and simple birch plywood kitchen in Edinborough,
• City of Melbourne, 2020, ‘National Construction Code’ Building Act 1993 and
[online], Available: https://www.houzz.com.au/photos/striking-and-simple-
Building Regulations 2018, [online], Available: https://www.melbourne.vic.gov.
birch-plywood-kitchen-in-edinburgh-contemporary-kitchen-edinburgh-phvw-
au/building-and-development/planning-and-building-services/construction-
vp~119327851
development/legislation-guidelines/Pages/building-act-1993-buildingregulations-2018.aspx?fbclid=IwAR3XNa2-9p07dO9TdCpUlhW0jeok2Oc0B7-
• Brown, N., 2020, Alexandra Roate State, WikiArquitectura, [online], Available:
3qpTyQfeEPVj0mLJfNnVRRU4
https://en.wikiarquitectura.com/building/alexandra-road-state/ • Colour Designer, 2020, Whites, Wattyl, [online], Available: https://colourdesigner. • Casas, I., 2007, Social Inclusion and the Disabled: Accessibility Approach, The
net.au/
Professional Geographer, Iss. 59., Vol. 4., pp. 463-477, [online], Available: https:// www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1467-9272.2007.00635.x
• Council of Australian Governments, 2011, National Disability Strategy 2010-2020,
Commonwealth of Australia, [online], Available: https://www.dss.gov.au/sites/ • Chorherr, C., 2012, Project: Car-Free Housing, [online],
default/files/documents/05_2012/national_disability_strategy_2010_2020.pdf
Available: https://greeningthecities.files.wordpress.com/2012/07/ projectexamplegreensuccessesaustria.pdf
• DATA VIC, 2020, Victorian Government Open Data, Victoria State Government, [online], Available: https://www.data.vic.gov.au/
• City of Brimbank, 2012, Native Plants of Brimbank, Yumpu, [online], Available: https://www.yumpu.com/it/document/read/11518248/list-of-native-plants-found-
• DDA Design, 2015, Residential Home Design, [online], Available: https://
in-brimbank-brimbank-city-council
ddadesign.com.au/accessible-design/residential-design/ • DELWP, 2019, 20 Minutes Neighbourhoods, Victoria State Government, [online], Available: https://www.planning.vic.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0031/428908/ Creating-a-more-liveable-Melbourne.pdf
iii
• DELWP, 2017, Apartment Design Guidelines for Victoria, Victoria State
• DELWP, 2020, Plan Melbourne 2017-2050, Victoria State Government, [online],
Government, [online], Available: https://www.planning.vic.gov.au/__data/assets/
Available: https://www.planmelbourne.vic.gov.au/the-plan
pdf_file/0030/80994/Apartment-Design-Guidelines-for-Victoria_August-2017.pdf • DELWP, 2020, Planning and Environment Act 1987, Victoria State Government, • DELWP, 2020, A Practitioner’s Guide to Victorian Planning Schemes, Victoria State
[online], Available: https://www.legislation.vic.gov.au/in-force/acts/planning-and-
Government, [online], Available: https://www.planning.vic.gov.au/__data/assets/
environment-act-1987/144
pdf_file/0036/394695/A-Practitioners-Guide-to-Victorian-Planning-Schemes1.3.pdf
• DELWP, 2020, Planning and Environment Regulations 2015, Victoria State Government, [online], Available: https://www.legislation.vic.gov.au/in-force/
• DELWP, 2020, Better Apartments, Victoria State Government, [online], Available:
statutory-rules/planning-and-environment-regulations-2015/005
https://www.planning.vic.gov.au/policy-and-strategy/better-apartments#overview • DELWP, 2017, Reformed Residential Zones, Victoria State Government, [online], • DELWP, 2020, Melbourne Planning Scheme: PLANNING SCHEME, Victoria State
Available: https://www.planning.vic.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0027/103869/
Government, [online], Available: https://planning-schemes.delwp.vic.gov.au/__data/
Maximum-building-heights-and-number-of-storeys.pdf
assets/pdf_file/0007/485134/Melbourne_PS_Ordinance.pdf • DELWP, 2017, Reforming the Victoria Planning Provisions: A discussion paper, • DELWP, 2019, Melbourne’s strategic planning history, Victoria State Government,
Amazon AWS, [online], Available: https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/hdp.
[online], Available: https://www.planning.vic.gov.au/policy-and-strategy/planning-
au.prod.app.vic-engage.files/1115/0846/2231/Reforming_the_Victorian_Planning_
for-melbourne/melbournes-strategic-planning-history
Provisions_20_October_v7_FinalVersion_.pdf
• DELWP, 2017, Plan Melbourne 2017-2050, Victoria State Government,
• DELWP, 2020, Residential subdivision provisions, Victoria State Government,
[online], Available: https://www.planmelbourne.vic.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_
[online], Available: https://www.planning.vic.gov.au/permits-and-applications/
file/0007/377206/Plan_Melbourne_2017-2050_Strategy_.pdf
specific-permit-topics/residential-development/accordion-pages/residentialsubdivision-provisions
iv
• DELWP, 2015, Understanding the Residential Development Standards (ResCode),
• Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development and
Victoria State Government, [online], Available: https://www.planning.vic.gov.au/__
Communications, 2011, Population Growth, Jobs Growth and Commuting Flows in
data/assets/pdf_file/0030/97158/PPN27-Understanding-the-Residential-Devel-
Melbourne, Victoria State Government, [online], Available: https://www.bitre.gov.
opment-Standards-ResCode_June-2015.pdf?fbclid=IwAR2nN1SUfLENSliPj8Sh-
au/publications/2011/report_125
q_8sjxDtHWjL2hmEjaCicfaHpBYeYpDGhM4r0vw • Department of Social Services, 2016, Commonwealth State Territory Disability • DELWP, 2017, Urban Design Guidelines for Victoria, Victoria State Government,
Agreement Factsheet, Australian Government, [online], Available: https://www.dss.
[online], Available: https://www.urban-design-guidelines.planning.vic.gov.au/?_
gov.au/our-responsibilities/disability-and-carers/program-services/government-
ga=2.192070634.1961358546.1604721443-601537736.1601626169
international/commonwealth-state-and-territory-disability-agreements/ commonwealth-state-territory-disability-agreement-factsheet#1
• DELWP, 2019, Using the residential zones: Planning Practice Note 91, Victoria State Government, [online], Available: https://www.planning.vic.gov.au/__data/
• Department of Sustainability and Environment, 2007, Development Contributions
assets/pdf_file/0033/445389/PPN91-Using-the-residential-zones.pdf
Guidelines, Victoria State Government, [online], Available:https://www.planning. vic.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0021/102981/Understanding_Development_
• DELWP, 2015, Using Victoria’s Planning System, Victoria State Government,
Contributions.pdf
[online], Available: https://www.planning.vic.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_ file/0017/95012/Using-Victorias-Planning-System-2015.pdf
• Department of Transport, Planning and Local Infrastructure, 2014, Fact Sheet July
2014: Reformed Residential Zones for Victoria, Victoria State Government, [online], • DELWP, 2017, VicPlan, Victoria State Government, [online], Available: https://
Available: https://www.planning.vic.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0017/104156/
mapshare.vic.gov.au/vicplan/
Reformed-Residential-Zones_Transitional-arrangements_Web.pdf • Disability Advocacy Resource Unit, 2016, What is Disability Advocacy?, DARU, [online], Available: https://www.daru.org.au/wp/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/
v
What-is-disability-advocacy_final-June-2016.pdf
• Earp Bros, 2020, Green Certified Products, [online], Available: https://earp.com.
• Federal Register of Legislation, 2014, Commonwealth and State Housing
au/collections/green-certified-products/countertop
Agreement (Service Personnel) Act 1990, Australian Government, [online], Available: https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/C2004A04090
• Edwards, C., 2020, How people with disabilities are shaping urban design, The World Economic Forum, [online], Available: https://www.weforum.org/
• Federal Register of Legislation, 2014, Commonwealth and State Housing
agenda/2020/02/disabilities-urban-safety-insight-town-planning/
Agreement Act 1945, Australian Government, [online], Available: https://www. legislation.gov.au/Details/C2004C00438
• Engeler, B., 2020, pers. comm. • Federal Register of Legislation, 2014, Housing Assistance Act 1996, Australian • Esposito De Vita, G., Trillo, C., Martinez- Perez, A., 2016, Community planning and
Government, [online], Available: https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/
urban design in contested places. Some insights from Belfast, Journal of Urban
C2009C00378#:~:text=(1)%20The%20objects%20of%20this,evaluation%20in%20
Design, Vol. 21, No. 3, pp. 320–334
relation%20to%20housing.
• Esri, 2020, ArcGIS software, [online], Available: https://www.arcgis.com/index.
• Federal Register of Legislation, 2014, Infrastructure Australia Act 2008,
html
Australian Government, [online], Available: https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/ C2014C00639
• Eversole, R., 2012, Remaking participation: challenges for community development
practice, Community Development Journal, Vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 29–41
• Federal Register of Legislation, 2014, Infrastructure Australia Amendment Act
2014, Australian Government, [online], Available: https://www.legislation.gov.au/ • Federal Register of Legilation, 2017, Building and Construction Industry
Details/C2014A00077
(Consequential and Transitional Provisions) Act 2016, Australian Government, [online], Available: https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/C2017C00273
• Federal Register of Legislation, 2016, Lands Acquisition Act 1989, Australian Government, [online], Available: https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/ C2016C00827
vi
• Federal Register of Legislation, 1981, Local Government Grants Act 1975,
• Frantzeskaki, N., 2020, pers. comm.
Australian Government, [online], Available: https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/ C2004A01424
• Glackin, S., 2020, pers. comm.
• Federal Register of Legislation, 2018, National Housing Finance and Investment
• Gauntlett, B., 2020, Good Disability Policy Benefits Everyone, Australian Human
Corporation Act 2018, Australian Government, [online], Available: https://www.
Rights Commission, [online], Available: https://humanrights.gov.au/about/news/
legislation.gov.au/Details/C2018A00065
good-disability-policy-benefits-everyone?fbclid=IwAR2C03BcsQYOUXuRY82g2y0z5 d1Y-ohdHC_ye_ADoORbdmCnTtP-F4v5F2c
• Federal Register of Legislation, 2020, National Rental Affordability Scheme Act
2008, Australian Government, [online], Available: https://www.legislation.gov.au/
• GBV, 2020, GBV: Österreichischer Verband Gemeinnütziger Bauvereinigungen –
Details/C2020C00141
Revisionsverband, Housing Europe, [online], Available: https://www.housingeurope. eu/member-24/gbv
• Forrest, A., 2018, Vienna’s Affordable Housing Paradise, Huffington Post, [online], Available: https://www.huffingtonpost.com.au/entry/vienna-affordable-
• GECA, 2017, GECA standards and where they contribute to Green Star, [online],
housing-paradise_n_5b4e0b12e4b0b15aba88c7b0?ri18n=true&guccounter=1
Available: https://www.geca.eco/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/GECA-standards-
&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbS5hdS8&guce_referrer_
Green-Star-Credit-points.pdf
sig=AQAAAMz20V2QokoDRFSzh-FhJUND5yeBvdF90JvAoRvFVrQTdKnXD_AAbwP ulxzIV7xcvBMxfWbjQca4jPtlQfNxxifL58rl7fFNmvgUyqbxiXWL4YjtJ0eDhzyzboRGd9j
• GECA, 2017, Product Search, [online], Available: https://geca.eco/product-finder/
PwzXeXIaf3OGpRejA-givMnTGJuogP-28wUn_iL51Ar2f • Global Designing Cities Initiative, 2020, Traffic Calming Strategies, [online], • Forester, J., 2017, Introduction, Planning in the face of conflict, New York:
Available: https://globaldesigningcities.org/publication/global-street-design-guide/
Routledge,
designing-streets-people/designing-for-motorists/traffic-calming-strategies/
pp. xi-xvii
vii
• Gonchar, J., 2011, 8 House, Architectural Record, [online], Available: https://www.
• Imrie, R., 2000, Responding to the Design Needs of Disabled People, Journal of
architecturalrecord.com/articles/7867-house
Design Iss. 5., Vol. 2., pp. 199-219, [online], Available: https://www.tandfonline. com/doi/abs/10.1080/713683959
• Greatspacestv, 2016, 8 House x Bjarke Ingels Group (Copenhagen, Denmark
a BIG experience!, Youtube, [online], Available: https://www.youtube.com/
• Interchange, 2019, The Problem with Limited Accessibility in Public Spaces,
watch?v=uoR_LMi8Lx8&ab_channel=greatspacestv
Interchange WA: Advocacy, [online], Available: https://www.interchangewa.org.au/ advocacy/the-problem-with-limited-accessibility-in-public-spaces/
• Green Building Council of Australia, 2020, Recognised Product Certification
Schemes and Standards, [online], Available: https://new.gbca.org.au/product-
• Iglesias, J. L. C., 2014, What is the Psychology Behind Resistance to Change?,
certification-schemes/recognised-product-certification-schemes-and-standards/
Ideas for Leaders, [online], Available: https://www.ideasforleaders.com/ideas/ what-is-the-psychology-behind-resistance-to-change
• GTEK, 2020, GTEK Wall, [online], Available: https://gtekplasterboard.com.au/ plasterboard/wall-ceiling/wall/
• Jacob, M., Hellström, T., 2010, Public-space planning in four Nordic cities:
Symbolic values in tension. 41st edn, Geoforum, pp. 657–665 • Helioscreen, 2020, Calais, [online], Available: https://helioscreen.com.au/wpcontent/uploads/2020/08/Fabric-Specification-Sheets-Calais.pdf
• Johnson, S., 2020, Trellick Tower and the Cheltenham Estate, RIBA Architecture. com, [online], Available: https://www.architecture.com/image-library/features/
• Highgrove Bathrooms, 2020, Osca Ceiling Height Timber Mirrored Cabinet
trellick-tower.html?Action=Cookie
900mm, [online], Available: https://www.highgrovebathrooms.com.au/product/ osca-tall-timber-pencil-edge-mirrored-cabinet-900mm/
• Invest Victoria, 2020, Greater Melbourne demographic: Demographic Profile, Victoria State Government, [online], Available: https://www.invest.vic.gov.au/
• Hou, J., Grohmann, D., 2018, Integrating community gardens into urban parks:
resources/statistics/greater-melbourne-demographics#:~:text=Melbourne%20
Lessons in planning, design and partnership from Seattle, Urban Forestry & Urban
is%20comprised%20of%20family,persons%20per%20bedroom%20is%201.
Greening, Vol. 33, pp. 46-55
viii
• Karakusevic, P., 2017, The architect who reminds us council housing can be
• Lid, I. M., Solvang, P K., 2016, (Dis)ability and the experience of accessibility
beautiful, The Guardian, [online], Available: https://www.theguardian.com/housing-
in the urban environment, Alter, Vol. 10, 2., Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo
network/2017/oct/20/neave-brown-architect-council-housing-beautiful-riba-gold-
and Akershus University College of Applied Sciences, Oslo, Norway, pp. 181-
medal
194, [online], Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ S1875067215000863?via%3Dihub#!
• K-State News, 2014, Student designs toolkit to make cities inclusive of adults
with autism, Kansas State University, [online], Available: https://www.k-state.edu/
• Liveable Housing Australia, 2012, Liveable Housing Design Guidelines,
media/newsreleases/may14/decker5114.html
Department of Social Services, [online], Available: https://www.dss.gov.au/sites/ default/files/documents/09_2012/lhd_guidelines_2012_secondedition1.pdf
•Kingspan Group, 2020, Kingspan GreenGuard, [online], Available: https://www. kingspan.com/meati/en-in/product-groups/insulation/insulation-boards/kingspan-
• Living Streets Canberra, 2019, Submission for ‘Moving Canberra: Integrated
greenguard
Transport Strategy’, [online], Available: https://drive.google.com/file/ d/1vLRRjqSJjaU-vqDSkSyF2EvP55Pgd1JE/view
• KTU+A Planning and Landscape Architecture, 2020, Creating Walkable &
Bikeable Communities, U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development,
• Lowe, M., Whitzman, C., Badland, H., Davern, M., Hes, D., Aye, L., Butterworth, I.,
[online], Available: https://www.huduser.gov/portal/sites/default/files/pdf/
Giles-Corti, B., 2012, Place, Health and Liveability Research Program, University of
Creating-Walkable-Bikeable-Communities.pdf
Melbourne, [online], Available: https://socialequity.unimelb.edu.au/__data/assets/ pdf_file/0006/1979574/Liveability-Indicators-report.pdf
• Laminex, 2020, [Online], Available: https://www.laminex.com.au/ • Lucarelli, F., Fabrizi, M., 2012, The Trellick Tower: The Fall and Rise of a Modern
Monument, Microcities, [online], Available: http://microcities.net/portfolio/thetrellick-tower-the-fall-and-rise-of-a-modern-monument/
ix
• Madinoz, 2020, Stainless Steek D-Pull Handles, Architecture & Design, [online],
• McClelland, R., 2010, Disability (Access to Premises — Buildings) Standards
Available: https://www.architectureanddesign.com.au/suppliers/madinoz/stainless-
2010, Federal Register of Legislation, [online], Available: https://www.legislation.
steel-d-pull-handles#
gov.au/Details/F2010L00668
• Man 16.242, 2014, Brimbank Bus Service Review, Australian Transport Discussion
• Miller, S. R., A curriculum focused on informed empathy improves attitudes toward
Board, [online], Available: https://www.busaustralia.com/forum/viewtopic.
persons with disabilities, Perspect Med. Educ., Iss. 2. Vol. 3., pp. 114-125, [online],
php?f=4&t=75725
Available: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3722372/
• Mairs, J., 2016, BIG’s 8 House succeeds where the Smithsons’ “streets in the
• Minner, K., 2010, 8 House / BIG, ArchDaily, [online], Available: https://www.
sky” failed, says Bjarke Ingels, Dezeen, [online], Available: https://www.dezeen.
archdaily.com/83307/8-house-big
com/2016/02/03/big-8-house-robin-hood-gardens-smithsons-streets-in-the-skyfailed-says-bjarke-ingels/
• Moss, K., 2020, pers. comm.
• Martin, T., 2016, High-Rise Hell: The Doomed Tower Blocks that inspired Ben
• Municipal Dreams, 2020, Alt-Erlaa, Vienna: ‘the World’s Best Council
Wheatley’s new Film, The Telegraph, [online], Available: https://www.telegraph.
Housing?’, WordPress, [online], Available: https://municipaldreams.wordpress.
co.uk/film/high-rise/trellick-tower-history-jg-ballad/
com/2020/04/07/alt-erlaa-vienna-the-worlds-best-council-housing/
• Max, 2015, Outline of the Millennium Development Goals notable challenges,
• National Construction Code, 2019, ‘Section D Access and egress’, NCC 2019
MDG Monitor, [online], Available: https://www.mdgmonitor.org/outline-of-the-
Volume One Amendment 1, [online], Available: https://ncc.abcb.gov.au/ncc-online/
mdgs-notable-challenges/
NCC/2019-A1/NCC-2019-Volume-One-Amendment-1/Section-D-Access-andEgress/Section-D-Access-And-Egress-sub-item-28
x