Zoomburbia 2.0! Folio_Part 2

Page 1

LIVEABLE PLACES: PART 2_

DESIGN RESEARCH STUDIO C_ZOOMBURBIA 2.0 | SEMESTER 2, 2020 | SWINBURNE UNIVERSITY Amy Rodda | Master of Architecture & Urban Design - Unit Convenor: Ian Woodcock



ABSTRACT_ *Due to the scope of work undertaken in this studio this is PART 2 of my folio. This semester our Design Research Studio look at critically responding to Victoria’s Plan Melbourne’s 20-Minute Neighbourhoods Principal Strategy, and seeking what this this response would look like strategically, statutorally and spatially. As part of this studio I predominently worked as part of a group, known as Team 4, which was made up of Megan Murray, Arsen Sarkisian and Paris Triantis. Our project is called LiveAble Places and looks at a multi-scalar affordable housing approached to 20-Minute Neighbourhoods. I hope this folio gives you some insight as to what I did throughout Design Research Studio B / C Zoomburbia 2.0! & Team 4’s final proposal for both this studio and the Future Homes Student Competition. I have structured my folio sequentially so that you can get an understanding of what I learnt from this studio & the Liveability of Melbourne as a series of 20-Minute neighbourhoods. So, although the best way to understand this project is to have been part of it & experienced this studio for yourself [especially considering this studio took place remotely during the Covid-19 Pandemic Lockdown], I hope that by flicking through these pages you are able to get a sense of the problems & solutions; questions, processes & outcomes; & concepts, explorations & reflections that came out of Swinburne’s 2020 Zoomburbia 2.0! studio.



LIVEABLE PLACES_

DESIGN RESEARCH STUDIO C_ZOOMBURBIA 2.0 | SEMESTER 2, 2020 | SWINBURNE UNIVERSITY Amy Rodda | Master of Architecture & Urban Design - Unit Convenor: Ian Woodcock


07

SCHEMATIC DESIGN DEVELOPMENT

08

MID SEMESTER PRESENTATION

09

PROJECT DEFINITION

MID-SEMESTER PREPARATIONS Abstract / 330-331 QGIS Analysis / 332-339 Proposed City Typology / 340-341 Micro-urban Response / 342-349 Proposal Planning / 350-355

TEAM 4 | HABITATIO

Abstract / 356-357 Contextual Reasoning / 358-369 Topical Studies / 370-399 Scenario A / 402-411 Scenario B / 412-423 Scenario C / 424-497 Other Factors / 498-521 Next Steps / 522-523

ADDRESSING FEEDBACK

Abstract / 524-525 Feedback / 526-527 Brimbank Reasoning / 528-531 Business Model Investigation - Next Steps / 532-533


10

SUSTAINABLE MOBILITY ENVIRONMENTS

11

SCALAR THINKING

12

ARCHITECTURE IN CONTEXT

MOBILITIES DESIGN PRECEDENTS Abstract / 534-535 Precedents / 536-543

MACRO-MESO-MICRO APPROACHES Abstract / 544-545 Road Map / 546-547 Thought Process / 548-549 Scalar Thinking / 550-551

FHSC-TYPE LOT AMALGAMATIONS

Abstract / 552-553 Micro-scale Approach - Testing / 554-555 Architectural Massing Studies / 556-557 Site Amalgamation Studies / 558-559 Ground Floor Dwelling + Site Amalgamation Studies / 560-561 Social HousingTypologies Internal Circulation Moodboard / 562-563


13

SPACE, FORM & USE AT MULTIPLE SCALES

14

PLANNING LAW, STRATEGIC & STATUTORY PLANNING

15

FUTURE HOMES STUDENT COMPETITION

PROGRAM & NARRATIVE PLANNING

Abstract / 564-565 Strategy - Elements / 566-567 Barrier/Connections - Survey Responses / 568-569 Amenity Possibilities - SNAMUTS Findings / 570-571 Micro Scale Approaches / 572-573

FINALISING MESO-MICRO SCALE PROPOSALS Abstract / 574-575 Zoning & Overlay Observations_Steps / 576-583 Deer Park / 584-597

COMPETITION ENTRY

Abstract / 598-599 Entry Brief Response / 600-601 Materiality_Fixtures_Fittings / 602-607 Strategic Urban Planning Intervention / 608-609 Contextual Site Plans / 610-611 Floor Plans / 612-613 Rendered Roof Plan_Snapshots of Life / 614-615 Sections & Elevations / 616-618 Typical Apartment Layouts / 619-621 Internal Apartment Renders / 622-623


16

FINAL PRESENTATION

17

REFERENCES

LIVEABLE PLACES

Abstract / 624-625 LiveAble Urbanity / 626-639 Urban Planning Strategy / 640-647 LiveAble Housing / 648-689 LiveAble Sustainability / 690-693 LiveAble Places Pilot Intervention_Stakeholder Engagement / 694-717 LiveAble Movement / 718-733 LiveAble Environments / 734-743 Feasability Potentials / 744-745 LiveAble Place / 746-747

EXTERNAL CITATIONS References / 748-759


330


SCHEMATIC DESIGN DEVELOPMENT_ Once our project’s framework for mid-semester had been identified, our group [Team 4: Megan Murray, Arsen Sarkisian, Paris Triantis, Amy Rodda] zoomed into the meso scale in order to look at intervention opportunities that could come out of this studio. This was completed through a combination of digital spatial tools such as QGIS and Rhino, and through sketches and group workshops completed via zoom. This Schematic Design Development manifested into our Proposal Narrative that we used for our Mid Semester Presentation.

331


MELBOURNE | UNEMPLOYMENT RATES_

11.321 - 19.696 8.092 - 11.321 5.849 - 8.092 0.5 - 5.849

0 - 0.1

332


333


BRIMBANK | OPEN SPACE & CARPARKS_

Open Space

Carparks

334


335


BRIMBANK | FAST FOOD AMENITIES_

PPTN

Fast Food Amenities FHSC Lots

336


337


BRIMBANK | PROPOSED URBAN INTERVENTION IDEA_ connecting open space & repurposed carparks to create a new flow/walkability around & within Brimbank

Brimbank

Connectivity Intervention Carparks

Open Spaces

338


339


PROPOSED CITY TYPOLOGY_ In addition to looking into the societal city typologies explored with Bridgette, we have been look at different urban city typologies. 20 minuteness, aligns closest [out of the options to the right] with that of a hybrid of a compact city & a corridor city. We are aiming for most likely something like a Garden City, where you have all the amenity within multiple 20 minute neighbourhoods, and where the neighbourhoods themselves are fairly liveable, meaning that people won’t need to travel far for daily activities.

340


HYBRID

341


MICRO URBAN RESPONSE | ST ALBANS_

342


343


MICRO URBAN RESPONSE | ST ALBANS_

344


345


MICRO URBAN RESPONSE | ST ALBANS_

346


347


MICRO URBAN RESPONSE | ST ALBANS_

348


349


VICTORIA’S SOCIAL HOUSING PROBLEM_ 1,700 more social housing homes are needed EACH YEAR over the next 20 years ... in Victoria. - Victoria State Government

[ABS]

[OECD, 2019]

3.5%

15%

of housing stock in Victoria is social housing.

350

of Berlin’s housing stock was social housing in 2016.

[Lincoln Institute for Land & Policy, 2019]

[New Statesman, 2019]

of housing stock in Hong Kong is social housing.

of housing stock in Vienna is government owned social housing.

29%

60%


351


OUR PROPOSAL_

352


353


OUR PROPOSAL_

354


355


356


MID SEMESTER PRESENTATION_ For our Mid Semester Presentation Team 4 looked showcased the Social Housing stock issue that Melbourne is currently facing, and three potential future scenarios that could eventuate. Using the case study Municipalities of Brimbank, Dandenong and Hume, we also looked at whether social housing should be looked at on a locality by locality basis or should be looked at from a whole city approach. We found that Melbourne is not meeting is required 7% social housing goals, and looked at the potential opportunities that could eventuate from allowing this 7% to come to fruition. From our presentation, we were able to gauge that we had stumbled upon a topic that has a lot of interest, and the panel that we presented to encouraged us to continue down this thought process, and look at what having a lot larger percentage of social housing within Melbourne would look like.

357


WHAT A 20 MINUTE CITY MEANS TO US_ A 20-MINUTE NEIGHBOURHOOD means that an individual from any SOCIO-ECONOMIC BACKGROUND, AGE, or SOCIO-CULTURAL DEMOGRAPHIC can access all of the AMENITIES THEY NEED to COMFORTABLY live their lives and support their families within a 20-MINUTE ROUND TRIP of their home via WALKING, CYCLING or PUBLIC TRANSPORT. These amenities could include but are not limited to schools and education institutions , grocery, outdoor recreation spaces and places of worship.

358


359


URBAN GROWTH AREAS | URBAN EXTENT_

1883 1927 1954 1971 2001 2015 Growth Area Boundary Green Wedge

360


361


CONTEXT | COMPARISON ON A GLOBAL SCALE_

3.5%

VICTORIA Social Housing

362

15%

29%

60%

BERLIN

HONG KONG

VIENNA

Social Housing

Social Housing

Social Housing


363


Space For people

new inSTruMenTS oF MobiliTy ManageMenT

PRECEDENTS | LEARNING FROM OTHERS_

PRECEDENTS | LEARNING FROM OTHERS

PARIS

PARIS

circumstances. The central target of Vienna’s mobility policy is “80:20” – by 2025, Vienna’s residents will make 80% of their jour­ neys by public transport, by bike or on foot (2012: 73%) and only 20% by car (2012: 27%). In order to achieve this, Vienna is active­ ly promoting eco­friendly means of transport. optimisation and upgrade of public transport: expansion of the public transport system and improvement of public transport offerings through the construction of new metro lines, the extension of existing lines and measures to make the commuter railway network and tangential tram and bus connections more attractive. integration and networking of eco-friendly means of transport: Vienna is creating better options for combining eco-friendly means of transport (public transport, cycling, walking). walking and cycling – strong partners for eco-friendly urban transport: Vienna is creating a dense and attractive network of walking and cycling paths for the “city of short distances”. From street space to public space: Vienna is gradually renovating public space and thus improving its quality as a place where people want to spend time and creating more space for diverse uses. Mobility management for residential quarters and company locations: Vienna is relying on new instruments for tailored mobility concepts – including for large-scale residential, office and retail projects – that allow for short distances that can be travelled with environmentally friendly modes of transport.

VIENNA

Vienna iS MoVing VIENNA

100 364

HELSINKI HELSINKI


PARIS

VIENNA

HELSINKI

365


PRECEDENTS| |CATCHMENT CATCHMENT OF AMENITIES_ PRECEDENTS OF AMENITIES

10 Minute Catchment (800m)

PARIS PARIS

VIENNA VIENNA

Mobility

All Transport

Pedestrian Paths

Bike Paths

Amenity

Transport Stations

Health Services

Education

366

20 Minute Catchment (1600m)

Both Catchments

HELSINKI HELSINKI

Religion

Green / Open Space

Housing


PRECEDENTS | KEY FINDINGS_

PRECEDENTS | KEY FINDINGS Les agences d’urbanisme Une ingénierie en réseau pour les politiques territoriales

Mai 2012

Key characteristics from precedents • Walkable and rideable cities that allow for permeability through mobility of the site and zones throughout the city. • Pedestrian and cyclist movement as the primary mobility alongside supporting public transport with high frequency of use to allow for adaptable and quick transit. • Reduce inequality. • Functional Cities, people orientated cities. • Compact Cities with mixed approaches. • Housing infrastructure that allows for diversity. • Further increase pf amenities that allow education, health services. Overall supporting the inhabitants. • Green networks and open space to break spatial barriers of the compact city and create areas of tourism such as national parks.

The Most Functional City in the World Helsinki City Strategy 2017–2021

1 The Most Functional City in the World

Helsinki City Strategy 2017–2021

367


OUR RESEARCH QUESTION_ How might we develop a planning & design solution that ensures that all of MELBOURNE’S SOCIAL HOUSING celebrates mixed-use amenity & is accessible within 20 MINUTE NEIGHBOURHOODS, and provides ATTRACTIVE, ADAPTABLE, AFFORDABLE, ACCESSIBLE and SUSTAINABLE housing for diverse GROUPS and INDIVIDUALS within varied socio-

economic brackets, whilst encouraging ACTIVE AND SOCIAL LIFESTYLES?

368


HUME_

DANDENONG_

BRIMBANK_

SELECTED LGAS | NEIGHBOURHOOD CHARACTER_

369


WHY IS SOCIAL HOUSING SO IMPORTANT_

7.98% BRIMBANK

JUNE

VICTORIA 9.9% DANDENONG

7.95% HUME 370

25.83%

>

2020

45,698

People waiting for Social Housing


SOCIAL HOUSING STOCK = 3.5%

7%

2016

2036

371


1

2016 :

2.83

SOCIAL HOUSE Greater Melbourne

Households

167,580

Elligible Households

82,266

Regional Victoria

29.3%

Regional Victoria

59,008

Greater Melbourne

70.7%

Greater Melbourne

372


2036 :

1

14.66%

INCREASE Demand

3.24

SOCIAL HOUSE Greater Melbourne

Households

243,222

Regional Victoria

Greater Melbourne

192,145

Greater Melbourne

21%

8.3%

INCREASE

79%

Greater Melbourne

373


WHY IS MELBOURNE NOT A 20-MINUTE CITY?

Outer Ring

Percentage of Residents that don’t have walkable access to public transport (Infrastructure Australia, 2018)

1.5 M

Middle Ring

1.2 M

0.9 M

26.5 Adelaide

Inner Ring

0.6 M

0.3 M

ur

ne

e id

bo

el

el a

M

ur

ne

Ad

e id

bo

M

el

el a

ne

Ad

ur bo

el

M

Ad

el a

id

e

0.0 M

* walkable access to public transport is defined by Infrastructure Australia as being within 800m heavy rail & 400m of all other modes within the PPTN.

374

40.4 Melbourne


THE CHALLENGE OF ADAPTING TO 20-MINUTE NEIGBOURHOODS_ Average commute to work (km) in Australia’s Capital Cities

BRISBANE MELBOURNE SYDNEY PERTH CANBERRA HOBART ADELAIDE DARWIN 5 KM

10 KM

15 KM

20 KM

375


HOW OUR SOCIAL HOUSING STACKS UP | & TOTAL HOUSING STOCK BY LGA_ BRIMBANK SUBURBS_ Albanvale

Delahey

Keilor Lodge

Sunshine West

Albion

Derrimut

Keilor North

Sydenham

Ardeer

Hillside

Keilor Park

Taylors Lakes

Brooklyn

Kealba

Kings Park

Tullamarine

Cairnlea

Keilor

St Albans

Calder Park

Keilor Downs

Sunshine

Deer Park

Keilor East

Sunshine North

Attwood

Dallas

Kalkallo

Somerton

Broadmeadows

Diggers Rest

Keilor

Sunbury

Bulla

Hillside

Keilor North

Tullamarine

Campbellfield

Fawkner

Meadow Heights

Westmeadows

Clarkefield

Gladstone Park

Melbourne Airport

Wildwools

Coolaroo

Greenvale

Oaklands Junction

Yuroke

Craigieburn

Jacana

Roxburgh Park

HUME SUBURBS_

376


YARRA

N

Springvale South

15%

Dandenong North

PORT PHILLIP

Dandenong South Keysborough Noble Park Noble Park North

V

M

MARIBYRNONG TOTAL % OF SOCIAL HOUSING VICTORIA NEEDS TO MITIGATE OUR CURRENT SOCIAL HOUSING CRISIS

7% DAREBIN

MELBOURNE CITY S

M

BANYULE GREATER DANDENONG, HOBSONS BAY

TOTAL % SOCIAL HOUSING STOCK (AUSTRALIA)

4.2%

BELOW REQUIRED

Dandenong

TOTAL % OF SOCIAL HOUSING STOCK IN BERLIN

STONNINGTON

FRANKSTON MORELAND BAYSIDE P

TOTAL % SOCIAL HOUSING STOCK (MELBOURNE)

M

3.65%

POOR

Springvale

M

BRIMBANK, MAROONDAH

MONASH HUME WHITEHORSE MORNINGTON

M

CASEY KNOX WHITTLESEA, YARRA RANGES CARDINIA, GLEN EIRA, MELTON, WYNDHAM BOORANDARA MANNINGHAM NILUMBIK

VERY POOR

Bangholme

O

OUTPERFORMING REQUIRED

DANDENONG SUBURBS_

WORLD CLASS

MOONEE VALLEY

377


HOW OUR SOCIAL HOUSING STACKS UP | PRECEDENTS_

BOORANDARA : 1.4% SOCIAL HOUSING STOCK

378


YARRA : 15.6% SOCIAL HOUSING STOCK

In 2014 a block of three-storey social housing dwellings in Elizabeth Street, RICHMOND (left) were replaced with 207 SOCIAL HOUSING UNITS across four towers. (Williams Boag, 2020)

379


DIABETES PREVALENCE | REGISTRANT PERCENTAGE_ 7.31%

15,940

BRIMBANK

7.08%

12,080

1.5 - 2.5% 2.5 - 3.5%

DANDENONG

3.5 - 4.5% 4.5 - 5.5% 5.5 - 6.67% Urban Extent 2015 Study LGAs

6.83%

15,120

HUME 380


381


DIABETES PREVALENCE | TYPE 1 PERCENTAGE_ 5.14% 820

BRIMBANK

5.22% 630

5 - 7% 7 - 8.5%

DANDENONG

8.5 - 9.5% 9.5 - 12% 12 - 16.1% Urban Extent 2015 Study LGAs

6.42% 970

HUME 382


383


DIABETES PREVALENCE | TYPE 2 PERCENTAGE_ 91.28% 14,550

BRIMBANK

90.07% 10,880

70 - 85% 85 - 86%

DANDENONG

86 - 87% 87 - 88% 88 - 95% Urban Extent 2015 Study LGAs

88.89% 13,440

HUME 384


385


DIABETES PREVALENCE | TYPE 2 PERCENTAGE_ 6.67%

14,550

BRIMBANK

6.38%

10,880

1.5 - 2.5% 2.5 - 3.5%

DANDENONG

3.5 - 4.5% 4.5 - 5.5% 5.5 - 6.67% Urban Extent 2015 Study LGAs

6.07%

13,440

HUME 386


387


ACCESSIBILITY | NON-WORK SCORE_ An individual’s ability to reach non-work destinations, often as part of their daily routine. These destinations include grocery stores, schools, restaurants, parks, pharmacies and other common destinations. Overall, non-work trips make up almost 85% of all household travel [Citilabs, 2017]. 0-10 10-20 20-30 30-40 40-50 50-60 60-70 70-80 80-90 90-100 Urban Extent 2015 Study LGAs

388


389


ACCESSIBILITY | WALKSCORE_

MODE OF TRANSPORT TO WORK (ABS, 2016)

BRIMBANK OTHER

CYCLING

WALKING

PUBLIC TRANSPORT

PRIVATE VEHICLE

50

WALKSCORES 34-71 / 100

RANKINGS 76-300 / 346

MODE OF TRANSPORT TO WORK (ABS, 2016)

DANDENONG OTHER

CYCLING

WALKING

PUBLIC TRANSPORT

PRIVATE VEHICLE

43

WALKSCORES 18-66 / 100

RANKINGS

56

108-329 / 346

Walkscore [Average]

MODE OF TRANSPORT TO WORK (ABS, 2016)

Urban Extent 2015

HUME

Study LGAs

3

OTHER

97

CYCLING

WALKING

PUBLIC TRANSPORT

PRIVATE VEHICLE

48

WALKSCORES 35-64 / 100

RANKINGS 121-297 / 346

390


48 50

97

43

391


2016 - 2036 | POPULATION_ 2016 :

BRIMBANK

194,319

25.68%

2036 :

244,500

1.29% P.A. 2016 :

DANDENONG

152,050

43.74%

2036 :

218,560

2.19% P.A. 2016 :

HUME

197,376

74.28%

3.71% P.A. 392

2036 :

343,990


2016 :

2036 :

393


2016 - 2036 | DWELLING_ 2016 :

2036 : 23.42%

BRIMBANK

58,570

1.17% P.A.

2016 :

73,911 2036 :

31.38%

DANDENONG

60,375

1.57% P.A.

2016 :

82,445 2036 :

69.49%

HUME

81,928 394

3.47% P.A.

162,077


2016 :

2036 :

395


2016 : BRIMBANK

87.15%

public housing

1,797

87.58%

DANDENONG

public housing

2,355

87.57%

HUME 396

public housing

2,121


12.85%

3.52%

community housing

social housing

12.42%

4.45%

community housing

social housing

12.43%

2.96%

community housing

social housing

265

334

301

2,062

2,689

2,422

> > >

dwellings

58,570

dwellings

60,375

dwellings

81,928

397


SCENARIO TESTING _

398


ACTIVITY CENTRE_ Introduced through the melbourne 2030 strategy. intrinsically a part of melbourne’s growth and development. DEFINED AS PLACES FOR “...HOUSING, RETAIL, COMMERCIAL AND CIVIC SERVICES...” WITH A KEY FOCUS ON “... COMMUNITY SERVICES, EMPLOYMENT AND SOCIAL INTERACTION.” (brimbank activity centre strategy, 2018). Activity

Centres today prioritise high-density development and have ample connections to public transport. Both private and public sectors can invest in activity centres. Activity Centres are broken down into specific categories, as defined by the plan melbourne activity centre hierarchy : METROPOLITAN ACTIVITY CENTRE, MAJOR ACTIVITY CENTRES, NEIGHBOURHOOD ACTIVITY CENTRES, & LOCAL ACTIVITY CENTRES.

399


SCENARIO TESTING_

Social housing stock of 3.6% IN MELBOURNE 2036 will mean that ONLY 4 LOCAL GOVERNMENT AREAS will be providing adequate social housing. In 2036 these suburbs will only represent 8.7% OF MELBOURNE’S TOTAL POPULATION.

Central City Metropolitan Activity Centres Major Activity Centres PPTN 400m Catchment Urban Extent 2015

400

For all suburbs to supply adequate social housing, Greater Melbourne will need to TRIPLE SOCIAL HOUSING STOCK BY 2036.


401


SCENARIO TESTING _ DOES MELBOURNE’S CURRENT SOCIAL HOUSING APPROACH FIT WITHIN 20-MINUTE CITIES? Meeting Melbourne’s demand for social housing within existing 20-minute neighbourhoods.

402


SCENARIO A: THE VILLAGE_

BROAD DEFINITION:

+

“State intervention proves ineffective or unsustainable, but local communities attempt to fill the void”. SCENARIO SPECIFIC DEFINITION:

Currently in Melbourne a community housing groups, do a large proportion of the heavy lifting in supplying and maintain the cities social housing.

403


SCENARIO A I SOCIAL HOUSING BASED ON LGA PERCENTAGE_

3.52%

social housing

4.45%

social housing

2.96%

social housing 404

BRIMBANK

DANDENONG

HUME


existing

2,062

new

540

3.52%

social housing

2,602 4.45%

existing

2,689

new

983

social housing

3,672

2.96%

existing

2,422

new

2,369

social housing

4,791

405


SCENARIO A I SOCIAL HOUSING BASED ON LGA AGGREGATE DISTRIBUTED EVENLY_

new social housing

27,668

406

new

893

>


BRIMBANK

existing

2,062

4%

social housing

2,955 4.34%

DANDENONG

existing

2,689

social housing

3,582

4.25%

HUME

existing

2,422

social housing

6,889

407


SCENARIO A I SOCIAL HOUSING BASED ON OVERALL SOCIAL HOUSING DISTRIBUTED EVENLY_

3.5%

social housing

86,676

408

>

3.5%

social housing

2,796


2,062

new

734

BRIMBANK

existing

new

DANDENONG

existing

2,689

107

existing

new

2,422

374

HUME 409


410


SCENARIO A CONCLUSIONS: DOES MELBOURNE’S CURRENT SOCIAL HOUSING APPROACH FIT WITHIN 20-MINUTE CITIES? at 3.65%: YES at 7% in Inner Ring LGA’s: YES at 7% in Outer Ring LGA’s: NO

411


SCENARIO TESTING _ ARE MELBOURNE’S 20-MINUTE CITIES FIT FOR SOCIAL HOUSING? If Melbourne’s current distribution of 20-minute cities does not meet the numbers and needs of those living in social housing, what next?

412


SCENARIO B: THE PYRAMID_

BROAD DEFINITION:

+

+

“The Government responds crises “by enacting policies that benefit the few, resulting in economic concentrat ion and inequity”. SCENARIO SPECIFIC DEFINITION:

If there are not enough activity centres to support Melbourne’s social housing demand for 2036, the government will exercise its authority to move residents to undesirable locations.

413


SCENARIO B | SOCIAL HOUSING LOCATIONS OUTSIDE OF SELECTED LGAS_

SECNARIO B | SOCIAL HOUSING LOCATIONS OUTSIDE OF SELECTED LGAS

414

Outside OUTSIDEofOFHume HUME LGALGA

Outside OUTSIDEofOFBrimbank BRIMBANK LGALGA

Outside OUTSIDEofOFDandenong DANDENONG LGALGA

33 Beauchamp Street, Heathcote VIC, 3523 33 Beauchamp Street, Heathcote VIC, 3523

1 McIntyre Dr, Altona, Victoria 1 McIntyre Dr, Altona, Victoria

15 Lecky Street, Cranbourne, Melbourne, 3977 15 Lecky Street, Cranbourne, Melbourne, 3977


33 Beauchamp Street, Heathcote VIC, 3523

ALTONA CHARACTER_

1 McIntyre Dr, Altona, Victoria

15 Lecky Street, Cranbourne, Melbourne, 3977

ALTONA NEIGHBOURHOOD CHARACTER

415


SCENARIO B | EXISTING ACTIVITY CENTRES AROUND ALTONA SOCIAL HOUSING & BIKE PATHS_

416


SCENARIO B | ALL TRANSPORT_

417


SCENARIO B | ALL EXISTING ZONES IN HOBSONS BAY LGA WITH TARGET LOTS_

C1Z GRZ1 IN1Z IN3Z MUZ PCRZ PPRZ PUZ1 PUZ2 PUZ4 PUZ5 PUZ6 RDZ1 SUZ3 SUZ4 SUZ5 UFZ

418


419


SCENARIO B | ALL EXISTING ZONES IN HOBSONS BAY LGA WITH TARGET LOTS_

C1Z GRZ1 IN1Z IN3Z MUZ PCRZ PPRZ PUZ1 PUZ2 PUZ4 PUZ5 PUZ6 RDZ1 SUZ3 SUZ4 SUZ5 UFZ

420


421


SCENARIO B | PROPOSAL OF NEW ACTIVITY CENTRES & PUBLIC TRANSPORT_ * Special Use Zones 3/4 to be rezoned to Mix Use Zones. * IN1Z to exist for employment for members of the community. * PCRZ to create a wind or renewable energy facility. C1Z GRZ1 IN1Z IN3Z MUZ PCRZ PPRZ PUZ1 PUZ2 PUZ4 PUZ5 PUZ6 RDZ1 SUZ3 SUZ4 SUZ5 UFZ

422


423


SCENARIO TESTING _ MELBOURNE AS ONE GREATER 20-MINUTE CITY Meeting Melbourne’s demand for social housing by finding and filling gaps between activity centres (20-minute neighbourhoods).

424


SCENARIO C: LEVIATHAN_

BROAD DEFINITION:

+

+

“Governments rapidly and dramatically expand their powers, but use it to deliver collective benefits and goals”. SCENARIO SPECIFIC DEFINITION:

Governments identify and implement the number of social housing required in each LGA to ensure that all people who are eligible for social housing are catered for, and thus implement a greater density of 20-minute neighbourhood’s to meet the needs of residents.

425


SCENARIO TESTING I SCENARIO C_ BRIMBANK TEST IN 2036 WITH 7% SOCIAL HOUSING STOCK IMPLEMENTED: There will need to be 5,705 social housing dwellings to house an ELIGIBLE POPULATION of 17,115. POPULATION DENSITY within major activity centre buffers will increase from 1,697 p/km2 to 2,142 p/km2 KEY FINDING: Brimbank will require an ADDITIONAL 1.1 of an activity centre in 2036 to service its surrounding social housing population. 426


427


SCENARIO TESTING I SCENARIO C_ GREATER DANDENONG TEST IN 2036 WITH 7% SOCIAL HOUSING STOCK IMPLEMENTED: There will need to be 5,275 social housing dwellings to house an ELIGIBLE POPULATION of 15,299. POPULATION DENSITY within major activity centre buffers will increase from 3,360 p/km2 to 3,371 p/km2 KEY FINDING: Greater Dandenong will require an ADDITIONAL 0.3 of an activity centre in 2036 to service its surrounding social housing population. 428


429


SCENARIO TESTING I SCENARIO C _ HUME TEST IN 2036 WITH 7% SOCIAL HOUSING STOCK IMPLEMENTED: There will need to be 7,768 social housing dwellings to house an ELIGIBLE POPULATION of 24,080. POPULATION DENSITY within major activity centre buffers will increase from 446 p/km2 to 860 p/km2 KEY FINDING: Hume will be able to support its social housing population in 2036 with its existing major activity centres *for a short term period. 430


431


SCENARIO C I SOCIAL HOUSING BASED ON LGA PERCENTAGE_

BRIMBANK

7%

social housing

DANDENONG

HUME 432


existing

2,062

new

3,112

7%

social housing

4,509 7%

existing

2,689

new

3,082

social housing

5,771

7%

existing

2,422

new

8,923

social housing

11,345

433


SCENARIO C I SOCIAL HOUSING BASED ON LGA AGGREGATE DISTRIBUTED EVENLY_

new social housing

110,786

434

new

3,574

>


BRIMBANK

existing

2,062

7.63%

social housing

5,636 7.60%

DANDENONG

existing

2,689

social housing

6,263

3.70%

HUME

existing

2,422

social housing

5,996

435


SCENARIO C I SOCIAL HOUSING BASED ON OVERALL SOCIAL HOUSING DISTRIBUTED EVENLY_

7%

social housing

169,794

436

>

7%

social housing

5,477


2,062

new

3,415

BRIMBANK

existing

new

DANDENONG

existing

2,689

2,788

existing

new

2,422

3,055

HUME 437


SCENARIO C | INCLUSIONARY ZONES_KEY INSIGHTS WHAT IS AN INCLUSIONARY ZONE?

TYPES OF INCLUSIONARY ZONING

“INCLUSIONARY ZONING IS A LAND USE PLANNING INTERVENTION BY GOVERNMENT THAT EITHER MANDATES OR CREATES INCENTIVES SO THAT A PROPORTION OF A RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT INCLUDES A NUMBER OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING DWELLINGS.”

1. MANDATORY MODEL “REQUIRES THAT A NUMBER OF AFFORDABLE HOMES ARE INCLUDED IN DEVELOPMENTS AS A CONDITION OF PLANNING APPROVAL.”

- AHURI, 2017

2. VOLUNTARY INCENTIVE MODEL “NEW AFFORDABLE HOUSING IS ENCOURAGED BY REDUCING COSTS FOR DEVELOPERS.” - AHURI, 2017

438


WHY DO WE NEED INCLUSIONARY ZONING IN MELBOURNE? “DECLINING HOUSING AFFORDABILITY IN AUSTRALIA HAS A DISTINCT SPATIAL COMPONENT; THAT IS, THE PROBLEMS ARE MARKEDLY WORSE IN SOME REGIONS THAN IN OTHERS. AS A RESULT, THE ROLE OF THE LAND USE PLANNING SYSTEM IN DELIVERING AN ADEQUATE AND TIMELY SUPPLY OF NEW HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES IS UNDER INTENSE SCRUTINY. ” “THE LAND USE PLANNING SYSTEM PLAYS A CRUCIAL ROLE IN DELIVERING NEW HOUSING SUPPLY IN PREFERRED LOCATIONS.” “...FUNDAMENTAL PLANNING POLICIES – SUCH AS DECISIONS TO CONTAIN URBAN GROWTH BY LIMITING THE RELEASE OF LAND FOR NEW DEVELOPMENT – ARE INHERENTLY INCONSISTENT WITH OVERALL AFFORDABILITY GOALS (BEER ET AL. 2007, MORAN 2006, WHITE AND ALLMENDINGER 2003, NELSON ET AL. 2002)” “DEDICATED GOVERNMENT FUNDING OR INCENTIVES FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT OFTEN SUPPORT THESE APPROACHES.” - NEW DIRECTIONS IN PLANNING FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING AUSTRALIAN AND INTERNATIONAL EVIDENCE AND IMPLICATIONS, 2018

METHODS FOR CREATING INCLUSIONARY HOUSING, AS IDENTIFIED BY AHURI SCALES OF INTERVENTION IN PLANNING FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING: 1. SYSTEM WIDE APPROACHES: HOUSING SUPPLY, SPATIAL AND HOSUING POLICY, GOVERNANCE OF RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT 2. METHODOLOGICAL OR PROCEDURAL APPROACHES – AT THE INTERMEDIATE LEVEL: IMPROVING PLANNING FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING, COLLABORATION IN HOUSING RESPONSES, VARYING LEVELS OF GOVERNMENT (EXAMPLE BELOW) 3. PLANNING MECHANISMS OR LEVERS – WITHIN A LOCAL JURISDICTION: PLANNING MECHANISMS AND LEVERS, ACHIEVE AFFORDABLE HOUSING TARGETS, CONTROLS TO PROTECT LOW COST STOCK, REGULATORY INCENTIVES PROMOTING LOW COST HOUSING IN PRIVATE SECTOR, DEDICATING SPECIFIC PROPORTION OF DEVELOPMENT VALUE TO AFFORDABLE HOUSING STRATEGIES - NEW DIRECTIONS IN PLANNING FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING AUSTRALIAN AND INTERNATIONAL EVIDENCE AND IMPLICATIONS, 2018

439


**

ALL INCLUSIONARY RESIDENTIAL ZONES TO ADHERE TO 7% SOCIAL HOUSING POLICIES. INCENTIVES AND GOVERNMENT SUPPORT FOR PRIVATE INVESTORS TO BUILD SOCIAL HOUSING. MANDATORY AND VOLUNTARY PROVISONS FOR SOCIAL HOUSING.

440

INCZ1

[Inclusionary Zoning 1] Inslusionary housing Affordable, accessible, inclusive.


INCZ2

INCZ3

[Inclusionary Zoning 2]

[Inclusionary Zoning 3]

Inclusionary Mixed Use Housing Affordable, accessible and inclusive. Access to most important amenity such as health care and financial support services. Access on-site to diverse food options and recreational activity.

Inclusionary Public Mixed Use Inclusive and accessible public amenity and recreation. Outdoor exercise equipment, places to pause, places of worship (other amenity we listed in poll)

441


SCENARIO C | INCLUSIONARY ZONES_KEY INSIGHTS

• “...remedy planning system deficiencies” • “...leverage more subsidised housing stock for low income people, in preferred locations, by making affordable housing inclusion a requirement of development” - Gurran et. al, New directions i n planning for affordable housing: A ustralian and international ” evidence and implications, 2008)

442

“...housing affordability is a rguably an implicit normative goal of spatial all planning policy across jurisdictions reviewed.” - Gurran et. al, New directions i n planning for affordable housing: A ustralian and international evidence and implications, 2008)

• “...recapture some of the gain associated with planning decisions, or to create additional gain through incentives. • “...planning systems to provide for and facilitate greater housing diversity in the allocation of land uses and in specifying design codes” - Gurran et. al, New directions i n planning for affordable housing: A ustralian and international evidence and implications, 2008)


SCENARIO C | HOW MUCH AFFORDABLE/SOCIAL HOUSING WILL WE NEED

NUMBER OF SOCIAL HOUSING REQUIRED BY 2036 HUME

7768

SOCIAL HOUSING

DWELLINGS TO HOUSE AN ELIGIBLE POPULATION OF

24080

NUMBER OF SOCIAL HOUSING REQUIRED BY 2036 BRIMBANK

5705

SOCIAL HOUSING

DWELLINGS TO HOUSE AN ELIGIBLE POPULATION OF

17115

NUMBER OF SOCIAL HOUSING REQUIRED BY 2036 GREATER DANDENONG

5275

SOCIAL HOUSING

DWELLINGS

TO HOUSE AN ELIGIBLE POPULATION OF

15 299

443


SCENARIO C | LEVIATHAN ACTIVITY CENTRE WORKFLOW STE

P1

444

STE

|M

APP

P2

ING

ACT

IVIT

YC

ENT

RES

STE

| EX

IN L

POR

P3

GAS

TK

ML

FIL

EA

ND

DRA

G IN

STE

| BU

TO

FFE

P4

QGI

R8

S

00M

POI

NT

DAT A

STE

| EX

P5

POR

TM

APS

WIT

W

HB

O

UFF

RK

ERS

FL

| CA

AND

O

DAS

TRE

LOT

S3

93740 M

2

LGA

W

C

HE

C

KP

O

IN

T!


STE

P6

STE

|M

APS

P7

OF

LOT

W

SW

O

ITH

IN L

RK

GAS

FL

O

AND

W

STE

|M

APS

P8

ZON

ING

W

, A/

O

C, L

PPT

RK

N

C

HE

C

OTS

KP

O

FL

IN

T!

AND

O

STE

| ID

P9

ENT

IFY

GAP

S IN

A/C

PTV

W

C

HE

C

KP

O

IN L

IN

GAS

T!

| 20

STE

P 10

MIN

UTE

NEI

W

GHB

O

OUR

RK

HOO

FL

DP

O

ZON

ED

MA

P1

PRE

C

ED O ENT EA RK CH FL LGA O W C

W

ROF

W

| RE

ILE

C

SA

ND

M HE APS C KP O

HE

IN

T!

C

KP

O

IN

T!

445


SCENARIO C | MAPPING ACTIVITY CENTRES STE

P1

STE

|M

P2

APP

ING

ACT

IVIT

YC

ENT

RES

STE

| EX

P3

IN L

POR

GAS

TK

ML

FIL

EA

ND

DRA

STE

| BU

P4

FFE

R8

00M

POIN

G IN

TD

TO

QGIS

ATA

STE

| EX

P5

POR

TM

APS

WIT

W

HB

O

UFF

RK

ERS

FL

AND

O

STE

| CA

P6

DAS

TRE

LOT

S3

93-7 40M

2

STE

|M

APS

P7

OF

LOT

W

LGA

W

C

HE

C

KP

O

SW

IN

T!

O

ITH

IN L

RK

GAS

FL

O

AND

W

STE

|M

APS

P8

ZON

ING

W

, A/

O

C, L

PPT

RK

N

C

HE

C

OTS

KP

FL

O

IN

T!

AND

O

STE

| ID

P9

ENT

IFY

GAP

S IN

A/C

PTV

W

C

HE

C

KP

O

IN L

GAS

IN

T!

| 20

STE

P 10

MIN

UTE

NEIG

W

O

HBO

URH

RK

OOD

FL

O

ZON

ED

MA

P1

PRE

C

ED O ENT EA RK CH FL LGA O W C

W

PRO

W

| RE

FIL

ES

C

AND

HE

MA

C

PS

KP

HE

O

IN

T!

C

KP

O

IN

T!

BRIMBANK ACTIVITY CENTRE STRATEGY • SUNSHINE HEALTH, WELLBEING AND EDUCATION PRECINCT (SHWEP) KEY COMPONENT TO SUNSHINE NATIONAL EMPLOYMENT AND INNOVATION CLUSTER

• LOCATED BETWEEN M80 WESTERN RING ROAD, GINIFER RAILWAY STATION, ST ALBANS, STONY CREEK AND ST ALBANS ROAD.

• SIMILAR CHARACTERISTICS TO AN ACTIVITY CENTRE

• INCREASE AMOUNT OF HOUSING THAT HAS GOOD ACCESS TO SERVICES, FACILITIES, TRANSPORT • IDENTIFY ZONES WITHIN TOWN CENTRES AND CHANGE THE PLANNING SCHEME PROVISIONS, REZOINING DISUSED INDUSTRIAL ZONES AND OTHER ZONES • DIVERSITY IN HOUSING AND HOUSING LOCATIONS

446


DATA WE INPUT INTO GOOGLE MY MAPS

ACTIVITY CENTRE MAPS FROM STRATEGY REPORT

447


SCENARIO C | MAPPING ACTIVITY CENTRES STE

P1

STE

|M

P2

APP

ING

ACT

IVIT

YC

ENT

RES

STE

| EX

P3

POR

TK

ML

IN L

GAS

FIL

EA

ND

DRA

STE

| BU

P4

FFE

R8

00M

POIN

TD

G IN

TO

ATA

QGIS

STE

| EX

P5

POR

TM

APS

WIT

W

HB

O

UFF

RK

ERS

FL

AND

O

STE

| CA

P6

DAS

TRE

LOT

S3

93-7 40M

2

LGA

W

C

HE

C

KP

O

STE

|M

APS

P7

OF

LOT

W

SW

O

ITH

IN L

RK

GAS

FL

O

AND

W

STE

|M

APS

C

N

HE

Hume will be having new development areas up to 40km from the cbd, so activity centres (metro, major, neighbourhood, local) need to be strategically planned and managed to meet the

Centre (future)

C, L

C

OTS

RK

PPT

T!

Broadmeadows, Donnybrook (Lockerbie) Town

, A/

O

HUME ACTIVITY CENTRES

METROPOLITAN ACTIVITY CENTRES (MAC)_

ING

W

IN

needs of residents.

P8

ZON

KP

O

FL

IN

T!

AND

O

STE

| ID

P9

ENT

IFY

GAP

S IN

A/C

PTV

W

C

HE

C

KP

O

IN L

GAS

| 20

STE

P 10

MIN

UTE

NEIG

W

O

HBO

URH

RK

OOD

FL

IN

T!

O

ZON

ED

MA

P1

PRE

C

ED O ENT EA RK CH FL LGA O W C

W

PRO

W

| RE

FIL

ES

C

AND

HE

MA

C

PS

KP

HE

O

IN

T!

C

KP

O

IN

T!

MAJOR ACTIVITY CENTRES_

Sunbury Town Centre, Roxburgh Park Shopping Centre, Craigieburn Town Centre, Gladstone Park Shopping Centre, Mickleham (Merrifield) Town Centre (future), and Sunbury South Town Centre (future).

NEIGHBOURHOOD CENTRES_

Campbellfield Plaza, Craigieburn Plaza, Meadow Heights, Greenvale, Westmeadows Village, Dallas, Olsen Place, Tullamarine, Upfield, Highlands Shopping Centre, Homestead Place and Gap Road (Sunbury). New Neighbourhood Centres planned in developing areas of the City

448


“To establish Donnybrook (Lockerbie) as a vibrant mixed use and economic hub which provides a focal point for the northern part of the Melbourne Northern Sub Region.” “To establish Broadmeadows Metropolitan Activity Centre as a premier activity centre in the Melbourne Northern Sub Region with a diverse range of retail, commercial, educational, cultural, community and leisure facilities” - Activity Centres, Hume Planning Scheme

449


SCENARIO C | MAPPING ACTIVITY CENTRES STE

P1

STE

|M

P2

APP

ING

ACT

IVIT

YC

ENT

RES

STE

| EX

P3

IN L

POR

GAS

TK

ML

FIL

EA

ND

DRA

STE

| BU

P4

FFE

R8

00M

POIN

STE

| EX

P5

POR

TM

G IN

TD

TO

ATA

QGIS

APS

WIT

W

HB

O

UFF

RK

ERS

FL

AND

O

STE

| CA

P6

DAS

TRE

LOT

S3

93-7 40M

2

STE

|M

APS

P7

OF

LOT

W

LGA

W

C

HE

C

SW

O

STE

|M

APS

P8

ZON

ITH

ING

W

IN L

O

IN

T!

P9

ENT

IFY

C, L

O

G RK AS AND FL P O PTN W C HE

C

KP

, A/

STE

| ID

HE

O

S IN

OTS

RK AND P FL TV O W C

KP

GAP

IN

T!

C

KP

A/C

O

IN L

IN

GAS

T!

| 20

STE

P 10

MIN

UTE

NEIG

W

| RE

ZON

ED

HBO

URH

MA

P1

PRE

CE

W DENT O O RK OD PR RK EACH FL OFILE FL LGA O S O W AND W C MAPS C HE HE C C KP KP O O IN IN T! T!

O

GREATER DANDENONG ACTIVITY CENTRES • NCPF assessment on performance of greater dandenong • local shopping areas • established a neighbourhood centre hierarchy based on agreed criteria • aligns with metropolitan and local planning strategy • local economic conditions. - ordinary council meeting 160808, 2016

450


451


SCENARIO C | EXPORTING KML FILES INTO QGIS STE

P1

452

STE

|M

P2

APP

ING

ACT

IVIT

YC

ENT

RES

STE

| EX

P3

IN L

POR

GAS

TK

ML

FIL

EA

ND

DRA

STE

| BU

P4

FFE

R8

00M

POIN

G IN

TD

TO

QGIS

ATA

STE

| EX

P5

POR

TM

APS

WIT

W

HB

O

UFF

RK

ERS

FL

AND

O

STE

| CA

P6

DAS

TRE

LOT

S3

93-7 40M

2

LGA

W

C

HE

C

STE

|M

APS

P7

OF

LOT

W

SW

O

STE

|M

APS

P8

ZON

ITH

ING

W

IN L

O

IN

T!

P9

ENT

IFY

C, L

O

G RK AS AND FL P O PTN W C HE

C

KP

, A/

STE

| ID

HE

O

S IN

OTS

RK AND P FL TV O W C

KP

GAP

IN

T!

C

KP

A/C

O

IN L

IN

GAS

T!

| 20

STE

P 10

MIN

UTE

NEIG

W

HBO

URH

| RE

ZON

ED

MA

P1

PRE

CE

W DENT O O RK OD PR RK EACH FL OFILE FL LGA O S O W AND W C MAPS C HE HE C C KP KP O O IN IN T! T!

O


453


SCENARIO C | BUFFERING 800M (10 MIN) CATCHMENTS FROM ACTIVITY CENTRES STE

P1

STE

|M

P2

APP

ING

ACT

IVIT

YC

ENT

RES

STE

| EX

P3

POR

TK

ML

FIL

EA

IN L

GAS

ND

DRA

STE

| BU

P4

FFE

R8

00M

POIN

G IN

TD

TO

QGIS

ATA

STE

| EX

P5

POR

TM

APS

WIT

W

HB

O

UFF

RK

ERS

FL

AND

O

STE

| CA

P6

DAS

TRE

LOT

S3

93-7 40M

2

LGA

W

C

HE

C

STE

|M

APS

P7

OF

LOT

W

SW

O

STE

|M

APS

P8

ZON

ITH

ING

W

IN L

O

IN

T!

P9

ENT

IFY

C, L

O

G RK AS AND FL P O PTN W C HE

C

KP

, A/

STE

| ID

HE

O

S IN

OTS

RK AND P FL TV O W C

KP

GAP

IN

T!

C

KP

A/C

O

IN L

IN

GAS

T!

| 20

STE

P 10

MIN

UTE

NEIG

W

HBO

URH

| RE

ZON

ED

MA

P1

PRE

CE

W DENT O O RK OD PR RK EACH FL OFILE FL LGA O S O W AND W C MAPS C HE HE C C KP KP O O IN IN T! T!

O

WHY 800M (10 MIN) BUFFERS? 800m is 10 minutes average walking pace of 1.33m/s • 10 min one way creates a 20 minute round-trip, which is truly a 20 minute neighbourhood • 10 minutes to destinations is more accessible for people with mobility impairments and other disabilities

454


455


SCENARIO C | CHECKPOINT 1_BRIMBANK, HUME, GREATER DANDENONG STE

P1

STE

|M

P2

APP

ING

ACT

IVIT

YC

ENT

RES

STE

| EX

P3

POR

TK

ML

IN L

GAS

FIL

EA

ND

DRA

STE

| BU

P4

FFE

R8

00M

POIN

G IN

TD

TO

QGIS

ATA

STE

| EX

P5

POR

TM

APS

WIT

W

HB

O

UFF

RK

ERS

FL

AND

O

STE

| CA

P6

DAS

TRE

LOT

S3

93-7 40M

2

LGA

W

C

HE

C

STE

|M

APS

P7

OF

LOT

W

SW

O

STE

|M

APS

P8

ZON

ITH

ING

W

IN L

O

IN

T!

P9

ENT

IFY

C, L

O

G RK AS AND FL P O PTN W C HE

C

KP

, A/

STE

| ID

HE

O

S IN

OTS

RK AND P FL TV O W C

KP

GAP

IN

T!

C

KP

A/C

O

IN L

GAS

| 20

STE

P 10

MIN

UTE

NEIG

W

T!

URH

| RE

ZON

ED

MA

P1

PRE

CE

W DENT O O RK OD PR RK EACH FL OFILE FL LGA O S O W AND W C MAPS C HE HE C C KP KP O O IN IN T! T!

O

IN

HBO

KEY INSIGHTS:

• Hume is the most sporadic with its activity centres • brimbank has quite a few major and neighbourhood activity centres, however they service a lot of the same areas, meaning there are large portions of residents who miss out on accessible amenity within their beighbourhoods • greater dandenong has a high concentration of all kinds of activity centres further north • greater dandenong does not currently have much density south • some of the few residencies close to the south to lose out on connectivity to amenity • there are large roads spanning lots of the greater dandenong region, causing some sever gaps in activity centres and walkability

456


Brimbank activity centres Brimbank Major Activity and Metro Activity Centres Brimbank Activity Centres 800m Catchment Brimbank Cadastre OpenStreetMap

Bike networks hume Greater Dandenong Activity Centres

Principle bike network hume

Greater Dandenong Activity centre buffers copy

Strategic cycling corridor hume

Neighbourhood centre GD buffer 800

Hume activity centres

Large Neighbourhood Centre GD 800 buffer

neighbourhood activity cnetres buffered hume

Large Local Shop Node GD 800 buffer Local Shop Node GD 800 buffer

Major and metro activity centres Hume

Dandenong Cadastre

Gladstone Shoping Centre 800m Catchment

OpenStreetMap

Hume activity centres Hume Cadastre

OpenStreetMap

Brimbank Existing Major and Local Activity Centres

Activity Centres Greater Dandenong Cadastre

Activity Centres Hume City

457


SCENARIO C | CADASTRE LOTS 393-740M2 STE

P1

STE

|M

P2

APP

ING

ACT

IVIT

YC

ENT

RES

STE

| EX

P3

POR

TK

ML

IN L

GAS

FIL

EA

ND

DRA

STE

| BU

P4

FFE

R8

00M

POIN

G IN

TD

TO

QGIS

ATA

STE

| EX

P5

POR

TM

APS

WIT

W

HB

O

UFF

RK

ERS

FL

AND

O

STE

| CA

P6

DAS

TRE

LOT

S3

93-7 40M

2

LGA

W

C

HE

C

STE

|M

APS

P7

OF

LOT

W

SW

O

STE

|M

APS

P8

ZON

ITH

ING

W

IN L

O

IN

T!

P9

ENT

IFY

C, L

O

G RK AS AND FL P O PTN W C HE

C

KP

, A/

STE

| ID

HE

O

S IN

OTS

RK AND P FL TV O W C

KP

GAP

IN

T!

C

A/C

KP

O

IN L

IN

GAS

T!

| 20

STE

P 10

MIN

UTE

NEIG

W

HBO

URH

| RE

ZON

ED

MA

P1

PRE

CE

W DENT O O RK OD PR RK EACH FL OFILE FL LGA O S O W AND W C MAPS C HE HE C C KP KP O O IN IN T! T!

O

WHY 393-740?

This is based on the 2019 average size of lots within metropolitan melbourne, which dissapointedly is lower than the averagein 2018 (“the median lot size for Melbourne was just 393sq m at the end of June this year — 27sq m less than three years ago. At the same time last year it was 400sq m, and 420sq m in June 2016”) - Mawby, 2019

WHY SHOW LOTS?

This indicates where people actually live. this way it is easer to determine where residents are outside activity centres, and if they would need a 20 minute neighbourhood intervention.

458


459


SCENARIO C | CHECKPOINT 2_BRIMBANK STE

P1

STE

|M

P2

APP

ING

ACT

IVIT

YC

ENT

RES

STE

| EX

P3

POR

TK

IN L

GAS

ML

FIL

EA

ND

DRA

STE

| BU

P4

FFE

R8

00M

POIN

TD

G IN

TO

STE

| EX

ATA

QGIS

P5

POR

TM

APS

WIT

W

HB

O

UFF

RK

ERS

FL

AND

O

STE

| CA

P6

DAS

TRE

LOT

S3

93-7 40M

2

LGA

W

C

HE

C

STE

|M

APS

P7

OF

LOT

W

SW

O

STE

|M

APS

P8

ZON

ITH

ING

W

IN L

O

IN

T!

P9

ENT

IFY

C, L

O

G RK AS AND FL P O PTN W C HE

C

KP

, A/

STE

| ID

HE

O

S IN

OTS

RK AND P FL TV O W C

KP

GAP

IN

T!

C

KP

A/C

O

IN L

IN

GAS

T!

| 20

STE

P 10

MIN

UTE

NEIG

W

HBO

URH

| RE

ZON

ED

MA

P1

PRE

CE

W DENT O O RK OD PR RK EACH FL OFILE FL LGA O S O W AND W C MAPS C HE HE C C KP KP O O IN IN T! T!

O

KEY INSIGHTS

• Hume has very little pptn connections, especially as it goes further north and north west • Brimbank has more pptn frequency cutting through it, however some key residential zones are missed in existing pptn • Greater Dandenong is a key transit area, so has pptn lines running through it • neighbourhoods closer to the cbd benefit from more access to pptn network • the metro and regional trains do pass through a lot of the areas missed by the pptn lines. more minor stations could be added along these lines to extend the pptn in all lgas

460


Greater Dandenong Activity Centres

Train Line TR_RAIL

Greater Dandenong Activity centre buffers copy

Brimbank

Neighbourhood centre GD buffer 800

Brimbank Strategic Cycling corridor

Large Neighbourhood Centre GD 800 buffer

Brimbank principle cycling network Brimbank municipal bike network

Large Local Shop Node GD 800 buffer

Brimbank activity centres

Local Shop Node GD 800 buffer

Brimbank Major Activity and Metro Activity Centres copy

Train Line

Brimbank Local and Neighbourhood Activity Centres 800m Catchment

TR_RAIL

393-740 lots brimbank PPTN within Brimbank 2

greater dandnenong 393-740 lots

Brimbank LGA

pptn buffer

OpenStreetMap

EXTRACT_POLYGON

OpenStreetMap

Existing 393-740 Lots Hume City with PPTN and Activity Centres Bikes paths TR_RAIL PTV_METRO_TRAIN_STATION

Hume activity centres neighbourhood activity cnetres buffered hume Major and metro activity centres Hume Gladstone Shoping Centre 800m Catchment Hume activity centres

Brimbank Lots and Activity Centres with PPTN and Train Line

PPTN hume

Bike networks hume Strategic cycling corridor hume Principle bike network hume

Greater Dandenong 393-740 lots, Activity Centres and PPTN

393-740 lots in hume Hume LGA

OpenStreetMap

461


SCENARIO C | MAPS OF ZONING OVERLAYS WITH ACTIVITY CENTRES AND PPTN STE

P1

STE

|M

P2

APP

ING

ACT

IVIT

YC

ENT

RES

STE

| EX

P3

IN L

POR

GAS

TK

ML

FIL

EA

ND

DRA

STE

| BU

P4

FFE

R8

00M

POIN

G IN

TD

TO

QGIS

GREATER DANDENONG

ATA

STE

| EX

P5

POR

TM

APS

WIT

W

HB

O

UFF

RK

ERS

FL

AND

O

STE

| CA

P6

DAS

TRE

LOT

S3

93-7 40M

2

LGA

W

C

HE

C

STE

|M

APS

P7

OF

LOT

W

SW

O

STE

|M

APS

P8

ZON

ITH

ING

W

IN L

O

IN

T!

P9

ENT

IFY

C, L

O

G RK AS AND FL P O PTN W C HE

C

KP

, A/

STE

| ID

HE

O

S IN

OTS

RK AND P FL TV O W C

KP

GAP

IN

T!

C

KP

A/C

O

IN L

IN

GAS

T!

| 20

STE

P 10

MIN

UTE

NEIG

W

HBO

URH

| RE

ZON

ED

MA

P1

PRE

CE

W DENT O O RK OD PR RK EACH FL OFILE FL LGA O S O W AND W C MAPS C HE HE C C KP KP O O IN IN T! T!

O

Greater Dandenong Activity Centres Greater Dandenong Activity centre buffers copy Neighbourhood centre GD buffer 800 Large Neighbourhood Centre GD 800 buffer

Train Line TR_RAIL

Planning scheme zones Greater Dandenong Planning Zones C1Z C2Z CDZ1 CDZ2 FZ GRZ1 GWAZ GWZ IN1Z IN3Z MUZ NRZ1 PCRZ PPRZ PUZ1 PUZ2 PUZ3 PUZ4 PUZ5 PUZ6 PUZ7 RDZ1 RDZ2 SUZ1 SUZ2 SUZ4 SUZ5 SUZ6 UFZ GRZ2 GRZ3 IN2Z NRZ4 RGZ1 RGZ2 SUZ3

OpenStreetMap

Major, Neighbourhood and Large Neighbourhood Activity Centres and zoning overlay Greater Dandenong

462

Large Local Shop Nodes and Local Shop Nodes with Planning Zones Greater Dandenong


HUME CITY COUNCIL

Bikes paths TR_RAIL

Hume activity centres

neighbourhood activity cnetres buffered hume Major and metro activity centres Hume Gladstone Shoping Centre 800m Catchment Hume activity centres

Planning scheme zones Hume Planning Zones

Greater Dandenong Activity Centres Large Local Shop Node GD 800 buffer Local Shop Node GD 800 buffer

Train Line TR_RAIL

Planning scheme zones Greater Dandenong Planning Zones C1Z C2Z CDZ1 CDZ2 FZ GRZ1

Hume City Activity Centres GWAZ and Planning Zones with PPTN GWZ and Train Line IN1Z IN3Z MUZ NRZ1 PCRZ PPRZ PUZ1 PUZ2 PUZ3 PUZ4 PUZ5 PUZ6 PUZ7 RDZ1 RDZ2 SUZ1 SUZ2 SUZ4 SUZ5 UFZ GRZ2

C1Z C2Z CA CDZ1 CDZ2 CDZ3 CDZ4 CDZ5 FZ FZ1 FZ3 GRZ1 GWAZ GWZ IN1Z IN3Z LDRZ LDRZ1 MUZ NRZ1 PCRZ PPRZ PUZ1 PUZ2 PUZ3 PUZ4 PUZ5 PUZ6 PUZ7 RCZ RCZ1 RCZ2 RCZ3 RCZ4 RDZ1 RDZ2 RGZ RLZ RLZ1 RLZ3 RLZ5 SUZ1 SUZ10 SUZ11 SUZ2 SUZ4 SUZ5 SUZ6 SUZ7 SUZ8 SUZ9 TZ UFZ UGZ UGZ1 UGZ10 UGZ11 UGZ2 UGZ3 UGZ4 UGZ5 UGZ6 UGZ7 UGZ8 UGZ9 PPTN hume

BRIMBANK CITY COUNCIL

Bike networks hume

Strategic cycling corridor hume Principle bike network hume 633-653 lots hume city

OpenStreetMap

Brimbank Planning Zones and Activity Centres Existing

Train Line TR_RAIL

Brimbank Brimbank Strategic Cycling corridor Brimbank principle cycling network Brimbank municipal bike network

Brimbank activity centres Brimbank Major Activity and Metro Activity Centres Brimbank Local and Neighbourhood Activity Centres 800m Catchment

Planning scheme zones Brimbank Planning Zones C1Z C2Z CA CDZ1 CDZ2 GRZ1 GWAZ GWZ IN1Z IN3Z MUZ NRZ1 PCRZ PPRZ PUZ1 PUZ2 PUZ3 PUZ4 PUZ5 PUZ6 PUZ7 RCZ RDZ1 RDZ2 SUZ1 SUZ2 SUZ4 SUZ5 SUZ6 UFZ ACZ1 GRZ2 GRZ3 IN2Z NRZ2 RGZ1

OpenStreetMap

GRZ3 IN2Z NRZ4 RGZ1 RGZ2 SUZ3

OpenStreetMap

463


SCENARIO C | IDENTIFY GAPS IN ACTIVITY CENTRES STE

P1

464

STE

|M

P2

APP

ING

ACT

IVIT

YC

ENT

RES

STE

| EX

P3

IN L

POR

GAS

TK

ML

FIL

EA

ND

DRA

STE

| BU

P4

FFE

R8

00M

POIN

TD

G IN

TO

QGIS

ATA

STE

| EX

P5

POR

TM

APS

WIT

W

HB

O

UFF

RK

ERS

FL

AND

O

STE

| CA

P6

DAS

TRE

LOT

S3

93-7 40M

2

LGA

W

C

HE

C

STE

|M

APS

P7

OF

LOT

SW

W

STE

|M

APS

ZON

ING

ITH

O

IN

T!

STE

| ID

P9

ENT

IFY

C, L

HE

KP

O

GAP

S IN

O

TS RK AND P FL TV O W C

O

C

KP

, A/

W

IN

LG RK AS AND FL P O PTN W C HE

O

P8

IN

T!

C

KP

A/C

O

IN L

IN

GAS

T!

| 20

STE

P 10

MIN

UTE

NEIG

W

HBO

UR

BRIMBANK GAPS (8) | RE

ZON

ED

MA

P1

PRE

CE

HO W DENT O RK OD PR RK EACH FL OFILE FL LGA O S O W AND W C MAPS C HE HE C C KP KP O O IN IN T! T!

O


HUME GAPS (9)

GREATER DANDENONG GAPS (7) 3

1

7

2

4

6 5

465


SCENARIO C | IDENTIFY GAPS IN ACTIVITY CENTRES_ADDRESSES STE

P1

466

STE

|M

APP

P2

ING

ACT

IVIT

YC

ENT

RES

STE

| EX

IN L

POR

P3

GAS

TK

ML

FIL

EA

ND

DRA

STE

| BU

FFE

P4

R8

00M

POIN

G IN

TD

TO

QGIS

ATA

| EX

STE POR

P5

TM

APS

WIT

W

HB

O

UFF

RK

ERS

FL

| CA

AND

O

STE

P6

DAS

TRE

LOT

S3

93-7 40M

2

LGA

W

C

HE

C

|M

STE APS

P7

OF

LOT

SW

W

O

STE

|M

APS

P8

ZON

ING

ITH

O

IN

T!

| ID

P9

ENT

IFY

C, L

O

G RK AS AND FL P O PTN W C HE

C

KP

, A/

W

IN L

STE

RK AND P FL TV O W C

HE

KP

O

GAP

S IN

OTS

IN

T!

C

KP

A/C

O

IN L

IN

GAS

T!

| 20

STE MIN

P 10

UTE

NEIG

W

HBO

URH

| RE

ZON

ED

MA

P1

PRE

SELECTED BRIMBANK ACTIVITY CENTRES FOR TESTING AND REZONING : CE

W DENT O O RK OD PR RK EACH FL OFILE FL LGA O S O W AND W C MAPS C HE HE C C KP KP O O IN IN T! T!

O

• Kings Road, Delahey, VIC • 38 Main Road, Kealba, VIC


SELECTED HUME ACTIVITY CENTRES FOR TESTING AND REZONING :

SELECTED DANDENONG ACTIVITY CENTRES FOR TESTING AND REZONING :

• Cahill Street, Bulla, VIC

• 112 Carlton Road, Dandenong North, VIC

• Donnybrook Road, Donnybrook, VIC

• Kirkham Road, Dandenong, VIC

467


SCENARIO C | NEW NEIGHBOURHOOD PERSONAS/PROFILES_BRIMBANK ADDRESS: 38 MAIN ROAD KEALBA, BRIMBANK LGA, VIC ABOUT: Car-Dependent neighborhood so most errands require a car. Kealba neighborhood in Melbourne. Nearby parks include Grantham Green Public Reserve, Brimbank Park and Sterling Reserve.

- WalkScore, 2020

80-100 APT WALKSCORE

468


39 WALKSCORE

39 TRANSIT SCORE

KEY ISSUES:

PROPOSAL:

PROBLEMATIC LANDFILL KEALBA LANDFILL.

• RELOCATE LANDFILL TO ANNANDALE ROAD CA ZONE (COMMONWEALTH ZONE) AS IT IS SURROUNDED BY INDUSTRIAL ZONES, GREEN WEDGES AND OTHER CA ZONES, DOES NOT DIRECTLY ABUT RESIDENTIAL ZONES

NOT WALKABLE

NOT EASILY ACCESSIBLE TO PPTN AND TRANSPORT

• CONVERT THE LANDFILL TO A GREEN WEDGE OR PUBLIC PARK AND CONSERVATION ZONE. THIS WOULD ATTRACT TOURISM, INCREASE LIVEABILITY OF THE NEIGHBOURHOOD CATCHMENT, ABOLISH TOXINS IN THE AIR FROM LANDFILL AND ALLOW FOR MORE COMMERCIAL/TOURISM AND RECREATIONAL AMENITY. • STREET FRONTAGE OF INDUSTRIAL ZONE TO BE CONVERTED TO MIXED USE COMMERCIAL INCLUSION ZONE (INCZ3) • EXISTING RESIDENTIAL TO HAVE AT LEAST 7% INCZ1 AND INCZ2 ZONES (INCLUSIVE OF BOTH).

RING ROAD SEPARATIONS

• CONNECTIONS FROM WEST TO EAST TO BE MADE THROUGH ROAD OVER RAIL CONNECTIONS (CONNECTING EXISTING STREETS) • CONNECTING ROADS TO HAVE VELOWAYS OR PEDESTRIAN FRIENDLY LANES/CYCLIST LANES EITHER SIDE TO ALLOW FOR PEDESTRIAN TRANSIT

NO PEDESTRIAN OR RESISDENT FOCUS

• EXTENSION OF EXISTING CYCLIST PATHS ALONG WESTERN RING ROAD • INCLUDE INCLUSIONARY ZONING WITHIN PU, CA AND SU ZONES

469


SCENARIO C | NEW NEIGHBOURHOOD ACTIVITY CENTRES_BRIMBANK_38 MAIN ROAD, KEALBA PROPOSED ZONING Kealba Existing Zoning and Neighbourhood Activity Centre Landfill relocation

Train Line TR_RAIL

PTV_METRO_TRAIN_STATION 393-740 lots in hume

Brimbank Brimbank Strategic Cycling corridor Brimbank principle cycling network Brimbank municipal bike network

Brimbank activity centres Brimbank Major Activity and Metro Activity Centres Brimbank Local and Neighbourhood Activity Centres 800m Catchment

Planning scheme zones Hume Planning Zones C1Z C2Z CA GRZ1 GWZ IN1Z IN3Z PPRZ PUZ1 PUZ2 RCZ RDZ1 RDZ2

Brimbank Planning Zones C1Z C2Z CA GRZ1 GWAZ GWZ IN1Z IN3Z MUZ NRZ1 PCRZ PPRZ PUZ1 PUZ2 PUZ3 PUZ4 PUZ5 PUZ6 PUZ7 RCZ RDZ1 RDZ2 SUZ1 SUZ2 SUZ5 SUZ6 UFZ GRZ2 NRZ2 RGZ1 393-740 lots brimbank within lga

OpenStreetMap

470


Kealba Existing Neighbourhood Landfill relocatio

ting Zoning and ood Activity Centre cation

Train Line TR_RAIL

PTV_METRO_TRAIN_STATION 393-740 lots in hume

Brimbank Brimbank Strategic Cycling corridor Brimbank principle cycling network Brimbank municipal bike network

MAJOR ACTIVITY CENTRE

Brimba Brimbank Local and Neigh

Brimbank activity centres

Brimbank Major Activity and Metro Activity Centres Neighbourhood Activity Centres 800m Catchment

Planning scheme zones Hume Planning Zones C1Z C2Z CA GRZ1 GWZ IN1Z IN3Z PPRZ PUZ1 PUZ2 RCZ RDZ1 RDZ2

Brimbank Planning Zones C1Z C2Z CA GRZ1 GWAZ GWZ IN1Z IN3Z MUZ NRZ1 PCRZ PPRZ PUZ1 PUZ2 PUZ3 PUZ4 PUZ5 PUZ6 PUZ7 RCZ RDZ1 RDZ2 SUZ1 SUZ2 SUZ5 SUZ6 UFZ GRZ2 NRZ2 RGZ1 393-740 lots brimbank within lga

INZ1 PPRZ INCZ1 INCZ3 PED CONNECTIONS

OpenStreetMap

471


SCENARIO C | NEW NEIGHBOURHOOD PERSONAS/PROFILES ADDRESS: KINGS ROAD, DELAHEY, BRIMBANK , VIC ABOUT: Car-Dependent neighborhood so most errands require a car. 18 minute walk from the Sunbury City (Flinders Street) - Sunbury at the Keilor Plains Railway Station (St Albans) stop. Delahey neighborhood in Melbourne. Nearby parks include Delahey Emerald Park, Cyril Clements Reserve and Tenterfield Park.

- WalkScore, 2020

80-100 APT WALKSCORE

472


37 WALKSCORE

42 TRANSIT SCORE

KEY ISSUES:

PROPOSAL:

VERY LOW WALK SCORE

• REPLACE SUZ2 WITH NEW INCZ1,2 AND 3 ZONES TO FACILITATE AFFORDBALE/ACCESSIBLE/INCLUSIVE HOUSING WITHIN ZONE, MIXED USE AFFORDABLE HOUSING AS WELL AS MIXED USE INCLUSIVE COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL. THIS TO BE INCORPORATED WITH PUZ3 TRANSPORT ZONE AND INCORPORATE SYDENHAM DRIVE ALONG THE RAIL

18 MIN WALK FROM ST ALBANS TRAIN STATION HOWEVER UNSAFE WALKING AN INEFFICIENT WALKING PATH

LARGE ROADS INTERSECTING (TAYLORS ROAD AND KINGS ROAD) NOT PERMEABLE

• POTENTIALLY NEW MINOR STATION (TRAIN) TO BE ADDED CLOSE TO SYDENHAM AND LADY NELSON INTERSECTION TO CREATE MORE WALKABILITY AND SAFE COMMUTE, ALSO INCREASE TRANSIT SCORE • PUBLIC PARK AND RECREATION ZONES WITHIN LARGE EXPANSE. • PEDESTRIAN PRIORITY ACCESS ACROSS MAIN ROADS (TRAFFIC LIGHTS, LOWER SPEED LIMITS DUE TO ACTIVITY CENTRE

LARGE SPECIAL USE ZONE (AMBIGUOUS WITH INTENTION OF THIS ZONE, SHOULD BE SPECIFIED BASED ON ADJACENT LAND ZONES)

• CONNECT EXISTING BIKE PATHS TO NEW POTENTIAL MINOR TRAIN STATION AND RESIDENTIAL/COMMERCIAL • INCLUDE INCLUSIONARY ZONING WITHIN PU, CA AND SU ZONES

ADJACENT LAND ZONES PUZ3 (TRANSPORT). NRZ1 (2 MAX LOTS NOT TALLER THAN 2 STORY DWELLINGS) AND RDZ1 (LIMITATIONS TO KINGS ROAD UPDATES). THESE INFLUENCE THE SUZ2

INADEQUATE AMENITY TO SERVICE THE 800M CATCHMENT

473


SCENARIO C | NEW NEIGHBOURHOOD ACTIVITY CENTRES_BRIMBANK_KINGS RO

SCENARIO C | NEW NEIGHBOURHOOD ACTIVITY CENTRES_BRIMBANK_KINGS ROAD, DELAHEY PROPOSED ZONING Brimbank Kings Road New Activity Centre with lots and zoning overlay

Train Line TR_RAIL

Brimbank

Brimbank Kings Road New Activity Centre with lots and zoning overlay

Train Line TR_RAIL

Brimbank Strategic Cycling corridor Brimbank principle cycling network

Brimbank activity centres

Brimbank Brimbank Strategic Cycling corridor

Brimbank Major Activity and Metro Activity Centres copy Brimbank Local and Neighbourhood Activity Centres 800m Catchment

Planning scheme zones Brimbank Planning Zones

Brimbank principle cycling network

Brimbank activity centres Brimbank Major Activity and Metro Activity Centres copy

C1Z CDZ1 CDZ2 GRZ1

Brimbank Local and Neighbourhood Activity Centres 800m Catchment

Planning scheme zones

GWZ IN3Z MUZ

Brimbank Planning Zones C1Z

NRZ1 PCRZ PPRZ PUZ1

CDZ1 CDZ2 GRZ1

PUZ2 PUZ4

GWZ

PUZ6

IN3Z

RCZ RDZ1 SUZ2 UFZ

MUZ NRZ1 PCRZ

RGZ1 393-740 lots brimbank

OpenStreetMap

PPRZ PUZ1 PUZ2 PUZ4 PUZ6 RCZ RDZ1 SUZ2 UFZ RGZ1

474

393-740 lots brimbank

OpenStreetMap


CTIVITY CENTRES_BRIMBANK_KINGS ROAD, DELAHEY, VIC PROPOSED ZONING

nt

MAJOR ACTIVITY CENTRE INZ1 PPRZ INCZ1 INCZ2 INCZ3 PED CONNECTIONS PROPOSED MINOR STATION

475


SCENARIO C | NEW NEIGHBOURHOOD PERSONAS/PROFILES_HUME_ CAHILL STREET, BULLA ADDRESS: CAHILL ST, BULLA, VIC, HUME

476


14 WALKSCORE

0 TRANSIT SCORE

KEY ISSUES:

PROPOSAL:

VERY LOW WALK SCORE

• PART OF A CONNECTION WITH SUNNINGDALE AND ELEVATION BLVD IN CRAIGIEBURN, CREATING THREE MORE CONNECTED ACTIVITY CENTRE NODES

CLOSE TO AIRPORT BUT ONLY BY CAR

• CONNECT NEARBY CRAIGIEBURN ROAD ACROSS DEEP CREEK TOWARDS WILLWOOD ROAD

UNDERUTILISING EXISTING ZONES

UNDERUTILISING EXISTING BIKE PATHS

• ST JOHNS ROAD IN BULLA TO CONNECT NORTHWARDS TO CRAIGIEBURN ROAD • BIKE PATH EXISTING FROM SOMERTON ROAD TO EXTEND ALONG WILLWOOD ROAD AND CONNECT WITH NEW DEEP CREEK BIKE PATH. EVENTUALLY THIS BIKE PATH TO CONNECT UP WITH WILWOO ROCK ENDURO PARK. • CONNECT BIKE PATH ON SOMERTON ROAD WITH OAKLANDS ROAD. CONNECT WITH DEEP CREEK BIKE PATH FURTHER UP NORTH.

NOT MUCH DIVERSITY OF HIOUSING OR AMENITY

• MORE PARKS AND URBAN CONSERVATION IN GREEN WEDGE (GW) ZONES. • IMPLEMENT 8 HA MINIMUM RURAL RESIDENTIAL LOTS FOR FARMING AND POTENTIAL MARKETS THROUGH RRZ AND GW ZONES. • INCLUDE INCLUSIONARY ZONING WITHIN PU, CA AND SU ZONES

477


SCENARIO C | NEW NEIGHBOURHOOD ACTIVITY CENTRES_HUME_ CAHILL S

SCENARIO C | NEW NEIGHBOURHOOD ACTIVITY CENTRES_HUME_ CAHILL STREET, BULLA_PROPOSED ZONING

Yuroke, Bulla and Wilwood Potential Activity Centres

Train Line TR_RAIL

Hume activity centres

neighbourhood activity cnetres buffered hume Major and metro activity centres Hume Hume Major and Metro Activity Centres 393-740 lots in hume

Planning scheme zones Hume Planning Zones C1Z C2Z CA CDZ1 CDZ2 CDZ3 CDZ4 CDZ5 FZ FZ1 FZ3 GRZ1 GWAZ GWZ IN1Z IN3Z LDRZ LDRZ1 MUZ NRZ1 PCRZ PPRZ PUZ1 PUZ2 PUZ3 PUZ4 PUZ5 PUZ6 PUZ7 RCZ RCZ1 RCZ3 RDZ1 RDZ2 RLZ RLZ1 SUZ1 SUZ10 SUZ11 SUZ2 SUZ6 SUZ7 SUZ9 TZ UFZ UGZ UGZ1 UGZ10 UGZ11 UGZ2 UGZ3 UGZ4 UGZ6 UGZ7 UGZ9 PPTN hume

Bike networks hume

Strategic cycling corridor hume Principle bike network hume 633-653 lots hume city

OpenStreetMap

478


TY CENTRES_HUME_ CAHILL STREET, BULLA_PROPOSED ZONING

and Wilwood tivity Centres

Train Line TR_RAIL

Hume activity centres

urhood activity cnetres buffered hume Major and metro activity centres Hume Hume Major and Metro Activity Centres 393-740 lots in hume

MAJOR ACTIVITY CENTRE

Planning scheme zones Hume Planning Zones C1Z C2Z CA CDZ1 CDZ2 CDZ3 CDZ4 CDZ5 FZ FZ1 FZ3 GRZ1 GWAZ GWZ IN1Z IN3Z LDRZ LDRZ1 MUZ NRZ1 PCRZ PPRZ PUZ1 PUZ2 PUZ3 PUZ4 PUZ5 PUZ6 PUZ7 RCZ RCZ1 RCZ3 RDZ1 RDZ2 RLZ RLZ1 SUZ1 SUZ10 SUZ11 SUZ2 SUZ6 SUZ7 SUZ9 TZ UFZ UGZ UGZ1 UGZ10 UGZ11 UGZ2 UGZ3 UGZ4 UGZ6 UGZ7 UGZ9 PPTN hume

INZ1 PPRZ INCZ1 INCZ2 INCZ3 PED CONNECTIONS NEW ROAD CONNECTIONS

Bike networks hume

Strategic cycling corridor hume Principle bike network hume 633-653 lots hume city

OpenStreetMap

479


SCENARIO C | NEW NEIGHBOURHOOD PERSONAS/PROFILES ADDRESS: DWYER STREET, DONNYBROOK, HUME ABOUT: Car-Dependent neighbourhood so almost all errands require a car. Donnybrook Road is a one minute walk from the

Melbourne - Seymour Via Broadmeadows, the Shepparton - Melbourne Via Seymour and the Melbourne - Seymour Via Broadmeadows bus at the Donnybrook Railway Station (Donnybrook) stop.

480


1 WALKSCORE

27 TRANSIT SCORE

KEY ISSUES:

PROPOSAL:

NOT A WALKABLE NEIGHBOURHOOD

• INCLUDE RURAL RESIDENTIAL LOTS (RRZ) TO ALLOW FOR RESIDENTIAL ON MINIMUM 8 HECTARE LOTS. INCENTIVISE RESIDENTS TO PARTICIPATE IN COMMUNITY FRESH FOOD AND PRODUCE MARKETS ALONG THE GW ZONES

NOT MUCH DIVERSITY OR DENSITY OF AMENITY

• INSLUSIONARY ZONING (1, 2 AND 3) IN EXISTING PUAND EXISTING GRZ AND NRZ ZONES (ONES THAT ARE NOT CURRENTLY POPULATED).

RELATIVELY INACCESSIBLE PATHS (GRADIENTS)

LARGE UNDERUTILISED GREEN WEDGES AND URBAN GROWTH ZONES

CDZ (COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT ZONE) UNDERUTILISED AND SHOULD HAVE APLAN IN PLACE TO POPULATE

• CONNECT TO DONNYBROOK STATION THROUGH ENHANCED BUS ROUTES AND STOPS BASED ON EXISTING BUS ROUTES (525 DONNYBROOK STATION BUS). • PARK AND PUBLIC RECREATION ZONES, PUBLIC CONSERVATION AND RESOURCES ZONES IN GW AND UG ZONES TO ENHANCE SUSTAINABLE POWER SUPPLY (WIND FARMS, SOLAR, BIOGAS ETC.) AND ENCOURAGE LEARNING AND CLIMATE AWARENESS (THROUGH PCRZ). • WITH THE CORE PLANNING PROVISIONS (CPP) OF A UG (URBAN GROWTH) AND GW (GREEN WEDGE) ZONE, PROVIDE OPPORTUNITIES FOR TOURISM (NATIONAL PARKS) AND CONSERVATION. • ENHANCE BIKE PATH CONNECTIONS TO DONNYBROOK STATION

INADEQUATE AMENITY TO SERVICE THE 800M CATCHMENT

481


SCENARIO C | NEW NEIGHBOURHOOD ACTIVITY CENTRES_HUME_DWYER STREET,

SCENARIO C | NEW NEIGHBOURHOOD ACTIVITY CENTRES_HUME_DWYER STREET, DONNYBROOK_REZONING PROPOSAL

Donnybrook Existing Zones

Train Line TR_RAIL

Hume activity centres Major and metro activity centres Hume 393-740 lots in hume

Planning scheme zones Hume Planning Zones C1Z CA CDZ2 CDZ4 FZ1 GRZ1 IN1Z PCRZ PPRZ PUZ1 PUZ5 RCZ RCZ1 RCZ2 RCZ4 RDZ1 RLZ SUZ8 TZ UGZ UGZ1 UGZ4 UGZ5 UGZ8

Bike networks hume Strategic cycling corridor hume Principle bike network hume 633-653 lots hume city

OpenStreetMap

482


CTIVITY CENTRES_HUME_DWYER STREET, DONNYBROOK_REZONING PROPOSAL

Donnybrook Existing Zones

Train Line TR_RAIL Donnybrook Existing Zones

Train Line

Hume activity centres Major and metro activity centres Hume 393-740 lots in hume

TR_RAIL

Hume activity centres Major and metro activity centres Hume 393-740 lots in hume

Planning scheme zones Hume Planning Zones C1Z CA CDZ2 CDZ4 FZ1 GRZ1 IN1Z PCRZ PPRZ PUZ1 PUZ5 RCZ RCZ1 RCZ2 RCZ4 RDZ1 RLZ SUZ8 TZ UGZ UGZ1 UGZ4 UGZ5 UGZ8

Bike networks hume Strategic cycling corridor hume Principle bike network hume 633-653 lots hume city

OpenStreetMap

Planning scheme zones

MAJOR ACTIVITY CENTRE

Hume Planning Zones C1Z CA CDZ2 CDZ4

INZ1 PPRZ INCZ1 INCZ2 INCZ3 PED CONNECTIONS

FZ1 GRZ1 IN1Z PCRZ PPRZ PUZ1 PUZ5 RCZ RCZ1 RCZ2 RCZ4 RDZ1 RLZ SUZ8

NEW ROAD CONNECTIONS

TZ UGZ UGZ1

BUS CONNECTIONS

UGZ4 UGZ5 UGZ8

Bike networks hume Strategic cycling corridor hume Principle bike network hume 633-653 lots hume city

OpenStreetMap

483


SCENARIO C | NEW NEIGHBOURHOOD PERSONAS/PROFILES_GREATER DANDENONG_112 CARLTON RD, DANDENONG NT ADDRESS: 112 CARLTON ROAD, DANDENONG NORTH

0-65 APT WALKSCORE

484


TH

33 WALKSCORE

41 TRANSIT SCORE

KEY ISSUES:

PROPOSAL:

NOT MUCH DIVERSITY OF HOUSING

• NEW MAJOR ACTIVITY CENTRE COMBINING THE LOCAL AND LARGE LOCAL EXISTING ACTIVITY CENTRES

IMPERMEABLE HIGHWAYS AND LARGE ROADS DISCONNECTING AMENITY FROM RESIDENTIAL

NOT MUCH INTERACTION OF RESIDENTIAL WITH NEARBY CREEK (DANDNEONG CREEK)

URBAN FLOODWAY ZONES PREVENTING ENGAGEMENT FROM RESIDENTS WITH WETLANDS AND DANDENONG CREEK

• WETLANDS RENEWAL AND REINVIGORATION PROJECT ALONG THE UFZ (URBAN FLOODWAY ZONES). BUILDING MORE DUREABLE WETLANDS TO PREVENT FUTURE FLOODING AND ALLOW MORE AMENITY AND RESIDENTIAL TO BE BUILT AND ENGAGE WITH THE DANDENONG CREEK. • PUBLIC PARK AND RECREATION ZONES WITHIN LARGE EXPANSE. • PEDESTRIAN PRIORITY ACCESS ACROSS MAIN ROADS (TRAFFIC LIGHTS, LOWER SPEED LIMITS DUE TO NEW MAJOR ACTIVITY CENTRE) • CONNECT EXISTING BIKE PATHS TO DANDENONG CREEK TRAIL AS WELL AS THROUGHOUT THE MAJOR ACTIVITY CENTRE • PROVIDE INCLUSIONARY AMENITY WITHIN 10 MINUTE (20 MINUTE ROUND TRIP) CATCHMENTS TO ENSURE THOSE WITH MOBILITY IMPAIRMENTS MAY ENJOY THE BENEFITS OF NEIGHBOURHOOD AMENITY AND ACTIVITY (TO WORK AROUND THE SLOPED PATHS).

VERY SLOPED PATHS, DIFFICULT WITH REGARDS TO ACCESSIBILITY.

• WITHIN PUZ, APPLY INCLUSIONARY ZONING FOR RESIDENTIAL AND AMENITY. • ONCE WETLAND RENEWAL PROJECT HAS FINISHED, COMMENCE REZONING OF UFZ TO INCZ1, 2 AND 3 TO CREATE MORE HOUSING FOR LOWER SOCIO-ECONOMIC GROUPS.

485


SCENARIO C | NEW NEIGHBOURHOOD PERSONAS/PROFILES_112 CARLTON RD, DANDENONG NTH_REZONING Greater Dandenong Activity Centres Greater Dandenong Activity centre buffers copy Neighbourhood centre GD buffer 800 Large Local Shop Node GD 800 buffer Local Shop Node GD 800 buffer greater dandnenong 393-740 lots

Planning scheme zones Greater Dandenong Planning Zones C1Z C2Z GRZ1 MUZ NRZ1 PCRZ PPRZ PUZ1 PUZ2 PUZ3 PUZ7 RDZ1 RDZ2 UFZ GRZ3 RGZ1 RGZ2

OpenStreetMap

Potential new Major Activity Centre 112 Carlton Road Dandenong North Greater Dandenong - Existing Planning Zones and activity Centres

486


487


SCENARIO C | NEW NEIGHBOURHOOD PERSONAS/PROFILES_GREATER DANDENONG_KIRKHAM ROAD, DANDENONG ADDRESS: KIRKHAM ROAD, DANDENONG ABOUT: Kirkham Road has a Walk Score of 39 out of 100. This location is a Car-Dependent neighborhood so most errands require a

car. This location is in the Dandenong neighborhood in Melbourne. Nearby parks include Dandenong Park, Greaves Reserve and John Hemmings Memorial Park.

- WalkScore, 2020

80-100 APT WALKSCORE

488


48 WALKSCORE

43 TRANSIT SCORE

KEY ISSUES:

PROPOSAL:

VERY LARGE AREA OF INDUSTRIAL ZONES ON BOTH SIDES OF RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBOURHOOD

• COMREHENSIVE RESIDENTIAL ZONES TO BE REINVIGORATED AND PLANNED TO BE INCZ3 ZONES AND MIXED USE RESIDENTIAL ZONES. COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT WITHIN THESE ZONES.

18 MIN WALK FROM ST ALBANS TRAIN STATION HOWEVER UNSAFE WALKING AN INEFFICIENT WALKING PATH

LARGE ROADS INTERSECTING (TAYLORS ROAD AND KINGS ROAD) NOT PERMEABLE

• ALL INDUSTRIAL ZONES TO BE LINED WITH SHOPPING/RETAIL STRIPS (C1Z AND PUZ) TO ALLOW FOR RESIDENTIAL ENGAMENET AND BUFFERING OF INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS. • COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT ZONES TO ALSO INCLUDE MARKETS AND FRESH FOOD MARKETS FOR COMMUNITY AND TO ENCOURAGE FOR FOOD CHOICE. • BIKE PATHS ALONG DANDENONG CREEK. PEDESTRIAN PATH CONNECTIONS FROM RESIDENTIAL STREETS ACROSS CREEK TO OTHER SIDE OF CREEK. • PARKLAND AND OUTDOOR RECREATION ALONG DANDENONG CREEK.

LARGE SPECIAL USE ZONE (AMBIGUOUS WITH INTENTION OF THIS ZONE, SHOULD BE SPECIFIED BASED ON ADJACENT LAND ZONES)

• ADEQUATE AMENITY THROUGH SHOPPING STRIPS ON MAIN ROADS AND STREETS. ACCESSIBLE AND INCLUSIVE AMENITY AND SERVICES.

ADJACENT LAND ZONES PUZ3 (TRANSPORT). NRZ1 (2 MAX LOTS NOT TALLER THAN 2 STORY DWELLINGS) AND RDZ1 (LIMITATIONS TO KINGS ROAD UPDATES). THESE INFLUENCE THE SUZ2

INADEQUATE AMENITY TO SERVICE THE 800M CATCHMENT

489


SCENARIO C | NEW NEIGHBOURHOOD PERSONAS/PROFILES_112 CARLTON RD, DANDENONG NTH_REZONING Greater Dandenong Activity Centres Greater Dandenong Activity centre buffers copy Neighbourhood centre GD buffer 800 Large Local Shop Node GD 800 buffer Local Shop Node GD 800 buffer greater dandnenong 393-740 lots

Train Line TR_RAIL

Planning scheme zones Greater Dandenong Planning Zones C1Z C2Z CDZ1 CDZ2 FZ GRZ1 IN1Z IN3Z MUZ NRZ1 PPRZ PUZ1 PUZ2 PUZ4 PUZ5 PUZ6 RDZ1 RDZ2 UFZ GRZ2 GRZ3 RGZ1 RGZ2

OpenStreetMap

Kirkham Road Dandenong Greater Dandenong Potential New Major Activity Centre - Existing Zoning and Activity Centres

490


Greater

Greater Da

L

Great

Kirkham Dand 491 Activity C


CURRENT OPTIMAL YIELDS I BRIMBANK ZONING AND LOTS_

4,520

633-653m2 Lots

15

dwellings / lot

67,800

633-653m2 Lots 492


493


CURRENT OPTIMAL YIELDS I DANDENONG ZONING AND LOTS_

2,216

633-653m2 Lots

15

dwellings / lot

33,240

633-653m2 Lots 494


495


CURRENT OPTIMAL YIELDS I HUME CITY ZONING AND LOTS_

5,750

633-653m2 Lots

15

dwellings / lot

82,250

633-653m2 Lots 496


497


ONLINE SURVEY | CREATING A NEW TERMINOLOGY FOR HOUSING

ONLINE SURVEY | CREATING A NEW TERMINOLOGY FOR HOUSING_

498


SOCIAL HOUSING | TYPOLOGIES_ SOCIAL HOUSING | TYPOLOGIES SOCIAL HOUSING | TYPOLOGIES Tower

3 Storey

6 Flat Pack

Tower

3 Storey

6 Flat Pack

TOWER

157 Melrose St North Melbourne, Victoria

157 Melrose St North Melbourne, Victoria

7636 7636

157 Melrose St North Melbourne, Victoria

3 STOREY

22-26 Barkly St Brunswick East, Victoria

22-26 Barkly St Brunswick East, Victoria

7580 7580

22-26 Barkly St Brunswick East, Victoria

6 PACK FLATS

264 Gower St Preston, Victoria

264 Gower St Preston, Victoria

30326 30326 264 Gower St Preston, Victoria

499


SOCIAL HOUSING | TYPOLOGIES & BEDROOMS_ SOCIAL HOUSING | TYPOLOGIES AND BEDROOMS Tower TOWER

amount of 20690

1 500

in vic

3 Storey 3 STOREY

amount of

2

22967 in vic

PackFLATS Flats 66 PACK

amount of

3

30326 in vic


SOCIAL HOUSING | BEDROOMS 4+

amount of

4

3443 in vic

amount of

5

430 in vic

amount of

6

211 in vic

An necessity for diverse uses but not a need for Victoria 501


NATSEM | INDIGENOUS INDICATORS_

Urban Extent 2015 Study LGAs

0

502

387


527

Wurundjeri Wadawurrung

BRIMBANK

808

Wurundjeri Bunurong

DANDENONG

1,482

Wurundjeri

HUME 503


NATSEM | MIGRATION RATE_

Urban Extent 2015 Study LGAs

0%

504

83.78%


50.67% BRIMBANK

60.96% DANDENONG

35.96% HUME 505


NATSEM | EMPLOYMENT RATE_

Urban Extent 2015 Study LGAs

0%

506

100%


64.95% BRIMBANK

62.74% DANDENONG

66.37% HUME 507


NATSEM | UNEMPLOYMENT RATE_

Urban Extent 2015 Study LGAs

0%

508

19.69%


10.60% BRIMBANK

10.22% DANDENONG

8.61% HUME 509


NATSEM | EQUIVALISED MEDIAN HOUSEHOLD INCOME_

Urban Extent 2015 Study LGAs

$520

510

$1,491


$708.08 per week

BRIMBANK

$682.25 per week

DANDENONG

$719.73

per week

HUME 511


SEIFA | INDEX OF ECONOMIC RESOURCES_

Urban Extent 2015 Study LGAs

732

512

1,143


962 BRIMBANK

936 DANDENONG

1000 HUME 513


SEIFA | INDEX OF EDUCATION & OCCUPATION_

Urban Extent 2015 Study LGAs

830

514

1,204


920 BRIMBANK

908 DANDENONG

940 HUME 515


SEIFA | INDEX OF RELATIVE SOCIO-ECONOMIC DISADVANTAGE_

Urban Extent 2015 Study LGAs

43

516

2,151


934 BRIMBANK

917 DANDENONG

957 HUME 517


ACCESSIBILITY | HEAT VULNERABILITY INDEX_

HEAT EXPOSURE

UHI | Vegetation | Roads_

SENSITIVITY TO HEAT

Population Density | Elderly | Very Young | Persons Need Care_

ADAPTIVE CAPABILITY SEIFA IRSD | SEIFA IEO_

Urban Extent 2015 Study LGAs

1

518

5


519


POPULATION DENSITY_

0

520

434,927


521


NEXT STEPS_

522

1

Select a scenario or hybrid scenarios to explore further.

2

Conduct an in-depth yield study of how much social housing can be implemented within our selected 20-minute neighbourhood scenario.

3

Tangibility/ feasibility studies. - Timeline - Cost - Can we incentivise private industry to participate?


4

Develop a micro-urban conceptual plan for implementing our approach.

5

Assess the replicability of the micro-urban plan.

6

Develop social housing architectural solution to fit within our neighbourhood scenario

7

Conduct an assessment of outcomes, what population will we be able to cater to, how much will our plan have increased walkability, how has our plan delivered on social housing requirements for 2036?

523


524


PROJECT DEFINITION_ After Mid Semester, Team 4 revised what our project will investigate within the second half of the semester, in order to respond to the feedback we received from Mid Semester and in order to obtain more tangible design outcomes. We decided that out of the 3 LGAs we looked at for Mid Semester, the LGA we wanted to investigate further was Brimbank, for the reasons listed on pages 528-531. We also came up with our proposal goal of having every 1 in 3 dwellings within Melbourne to be Social Housing - however, we also decided that we wanted to rebrand Social Housing to LiveAble Housing in order to disassociate the almost taboo stigma that is associated currently with Social Housing. The concept of 1 in 3 dwellings came from several research findings including that or National Shelter’s recommendations for inclusionary zoning:

National Shelter recommends that the Commonwealth encourages and provide incentives to State and Territory governments to include inclusionary zoning provisions in planning legislation, mandating 30% affordable housing requirements in all new developments, with a range of complementary measures.

525


MID SEMESTER FEEDBACK_ • Pick scenario with greatest social housing yield • Not feasible to move Brimbank tip • Make revised calculation of number of people needing social housing post COVID • Further explore inclusionary zoning strategy • Investigate strategies for how you can get the greatest social housing yield • Can we create a new typology for social housing that create the most yield? • Explore precedents in developing social housing design • How can social housing be sprinkled proportionally throughout neighbourhoods?

526


REVISED RESEARCH QUESTION_ How might we develop an AFFORDABLE, SUSTAINABLE AND INCLUSIVE solution that celebrates the attractive and accessible mixed-use amenity of REVITALISED ACTIVITY CENTRES across the CITY OF BRIMBANK whilst promoting ACTIVE AND SOCIAL LIFESTYLES?

527


WHY BRIMBANK_

✔ BRIMBANK STRATEGY | Clear 20-minute neighbourhood roadmap outlined POTENTIAL | clusters of under-utilised res and commercial zones within proximity to PPTN Major activity centres have potential for connection SOCIAL HOUSING | requires the greatest attention to boost social housing of the 3 LGA’s CONNECTION | broken connection to be resolved along rail/ industrial corridors

528


DANDENONG

HUME

DATA AVAILABILITY | far less information

ADOPTABILITY | Hume is currently invested in

available on Danadenong as it is a relatively new

a greenfield’s housing strategy which rejects the

LGA, meaning research will be a lot more rigorous/

20-minute walkable city principles.

time consuming. SOCIAL HOUSING | currently has the most social housing stock of the 3 LGA’s

529


WHICH SCENARIO DID WE CHOOSE TO EXPLORE_

Urban Strategy

COMPACT

530

+

Social Housing

CORRIDOR

+

LEVIATHAN

+

VILLAGE


WHY BRIMBANK? • Brimbank has a clear roadmap to 20 minute neighbourhoods • Brimbank has a lot of residential zones and small commercial zones that remain underutilized and run along existing PPTN • Brimbank has Major Activity Centres that are not well connected • Brimbank has large Industrial zones and large arterial roads that break up connection • Hume already has a lot of social housing • Brimbank requires more social housing to meet demand in future (more of a siginificant jump from what is existing to what needs to be) • Greater Dandenong has minimal information online; would require more extensive analysis...this may be what we include to show replicability across LGAs, but due to available data we will be benchmarking and proposing new planning schemes and provisions, social housing and an enhanced 20 minute neighbourhood LGA roadmap for Brimbank

531


BUSINESS MODEL INVESTIGATION_ “Everyone living in social housing pays rent. Your rent will not be more than 25 per cent of your total household income. Income includes wages and payments from Centrelink and the Department of Veterans’ Affairs” - DHHS, 2020 Vienna’s “limited profit model”

• “Private developers who collaborate with the city government to build affordable housing must allow the city to rent half of the new apartments to lower-income residents; the developer generally leases the remaining units to moderate-income residents”. • “Right to Buy legislation” passed in Austria in the 1990’s • Contributes to social integration of different levels of society. • Red Energy/ PTV operate within a similar business model in Australia.

532


NEXT STEPS_ MACRO URBAN |

Developing a transport strategy to support and connect our Brimbank activity centres with broader Melbourne.

MESO URBAN |

Further identification pin-pointing where activity centre and activity centre growth is required in Brimbank.

MICRO URBAN |

Development of an affordable housing outcome that fits within the competition requirements, 20-minute neighbourhood approach and addresses the social housing waitlist in Melbourne.

SUPPORTING RESEARCH |

Business model investigation to explore the feasibility of our approach. Social housing precedents research

533


534


SUSTAINABLE MOBILITY ENVIRONMENTS_ In week 8, we were visited by special Guest Lecturer Michael Trudgeon come in who is the Director of VEIL (Victorian Eco-Innovation Lab). As part of this lecture we looked into Sustainable Mobility Environmental techniques and namely the human-scale social dynamic conundrums that come from urban spaces such as garages, culs-de-sac and sidewalks. From this, Team 4 looked at the arrangements of different social housing typologies around the world, how successful or unsustainable they are. From these precedents we took great inspiration to the social dynamic outcomes that came from Alt-Erlaa in Vienna - the afforability, arrangement, amenity and sustainability of this typology was definitely something that we were aspiring to.

535


PRECEDENTS | TRELLICK TOWER_ • Located in Notting Hill, London • Constructed 1968-1972 in Brutalist style • 31 stories (91m high) • Design consists of a residential tower and services tower. • 9 different floor plan layouts ranging from 2-5 bedroom • 2000+ residents • Balcony’s are S/W facing • Range of communal spaces/ amenity on street level including shops, a laundry, a kinder and senior centre • apartments are spacious in size, but poor maintenance and lack of security saw the tower become an unsafe place to live. The service tower became the place to avoid as a place for crime and rough-sleepers • To fix this, a residents association was fromed in the 80’s who added CCTV, as well as a concierge service.

536


• Currently Grad 2 listed “the tower is undergoing £7.6 million refurbishment works which began in 2017” • Connection to service tower is at every third floor • Flats were for the first year heated with an oil system, until the oil crisis on 1973. • Flats are now heated by electric heating. • Trellick Tower is included in the “right to buy” social housing system • In 2017 there was a fire in the top two floors that did not spread because of the concrete construction.

537


PRECEDENTS_

Brunswick Centre | London

538

Sirius Building | Sydney

Ozanam House | Melbourne


PRECEDENTS | 8 HOUSE COPENHAGEN_ • Completed in 2010 • Named 8 House, because of figure of 8 plan • dwellings, shops, offices and a kinder are connected by a series of walkways and a central courtyard • also includes a bike path up to the 10th floor and green field • Elevated walkways contribute to social space being distributed evenly, creating a pleasant neighbourly environment. • 3 dwelling types for diversity of residents across 476 unit dwellings • mixed use with commercial at the bottom • communal passage is 10m w • concrete and steel frame construction

539


PRECEDENTS | ALT-ERLAA VIENNA_

• Constructed between 1973-1986 • approx 10km S/W of Vienna’s city centre • includes 3172 dwellings for 10 000+ residents • 27 stories high (70 metres) • First twelve sotries have deep soil planting to integrate the facade • 35 different floor plans to meet a diversity of needs • Alt-erlaa has become a satellite town of Vienna • You can live here for only 10% of your income • maximum yearly income of $53,225 after tax to be eligible • medium income of residents of $31, 500 p/a. • “is aimed at both people with low incomes and “a broad middle class” • “On average, tenants in Vienna spend 27 percent of their income on rent.” • Average rent paid by those in government subsidised housing is $670 AUD p/m (2019) • Average rent paid by others is $850 AUD p/m (2019)

540


Features |

• Young people in Vienna want to become housing association

• Rooftop swimming pool/ indoor swimming pool

tenants instead of owning their own home

• tennis court/ fitness centre/ sauna

• Towers work on a “limited profit model”

• car sharing

• “The Austrian Federation of Limited-Profit Housing Associations

• private garden’s for ground floor dwellings

(GBV) functions as compulsory audit organization for its members

• Adult education centre

as well as interest representation body”.

• 2,3 + 4 Bedroom dwellings.

• Another example of social housing in Vienna is “Autofreie

• 65% have 3 bedrooms

Mustersiedlung” where the residents of 244 dwellings have

• each balcony has garden planting/ spacious are

a contract not to own a car. The free space is then used for

for being outside

recreational/ communal spaces like a gym, sauna, bike repair, car sharing and youth centre. This concept originated in Breman, Germany. • Pupularity comes from housing security - residents are never required to move out. • New social housing cities are often established in former industrial neighbourhoods • the site is masterplanned with a mixture of apartment buildings serving every class all with access to the necessary local amenity’s

541


PRECEDENTS | ALEXANDRA ROAD PARK, LONDON_ • Designed in the 70’s, constructed in 1972-1979 • Located in Camden, London • Includes 520 dwellings across 8 floors each with private terrace • Dwelling types range from 1-4 bedroom • Includes amenities: shops, workshops, a community centre, schools and a public park. • Was a contrast/ breath of fresh air to the brutalist tower social housing being constructed at the time • Design was not originally met with positivity by local council, due to it being lower density than the norm • Decaying victorian mansions were originally located on the site • Each home has a garden • pedestrian redbrick street is 350m long • Rear facade is on West Coast rail line - staggered facade aims to provide noise buffer • Construction failures include the concrete trapping the heat and making the apartments too hot • was grad 2 listed in 1993

542


543


544


SCALAR THINKING_ As our LiveAble Housing proposal was progressing, we decided that it was important to work out where this proposal has come from and how we think it is going to come to fruition, so we decided to draft up these elements of scalar thinking. We also had several discussions about the strategy we as a group were going to take in order to get a tangible outcome from our proposal, and after several SWOT analysis discussions, as well as drop-in discussions with Ian, Team 4 came to the conclusion that our strategy for 20-minute neighbourhoods was to:

Only build new social housing in existing 20-min neighbourhoods, and divest the sector of any dwellings that are in car-dependent neighbourhoods. This would dramatically increase the gross population density in existing 20-min neighbourhoods, and therefore the overall proportion of Melbourne’s population living in 20-min neighbourhoods. The amenity of these neighbourhoods would improve, due to all the new, sustainable, well-designed dwellings and the increase in services to meet their needs. We believe through the success of this pilot strategy there is potential to refine these interventions to places based on a context to context situation, however, from a strategic planning point of view this would create the most feasible and replicable 20-minute neighbourhood model across Melbourne so as to implement our LiveAble Housing interventions.

545


ROAD MAP_

546


2025

2030

2035

2040

GREATER MELBOURNE

2042

2050 547


THOUGHT PROCESS_ IDENTIFIED LGAS

OUTLINE OF CRITERIA FOR SELECTION

[Type 2 Diabetes, Low SES, PPTN, Activity Centres, Social Housing Demand]

SELECTED CASE STUDY LGA

WHY SELECTED?

Existing Activity Centre Stragedy Existing Strategy for Housing Diversity Funding to Support Plan Melbourne 20 Minute Neighbourhood No greenfields left Infill Development Focus Outlines for Rezoning for more Housing Diversity

548

IDENTIFYING EXISTING ACS

WHY FOCUSING ON EXISTING ACS

Because in the planning scheme they outline how there should be more development & Housing within ACs, & that new ACs should be explored. Also in pilot program in Sunshine West, they chose this location due to its existing ACs & existing residential density. Also ACs are well connected to the PPTN & if not, they should be!


CREATING NEW ACS

WHY WE SELECTED NEW LOCATIONS

Due to gaps identified between existing AC Due to residential densities that were not too close to adequate amenity Due to existing PPTN that was under-utilising potential ACs

EXISTING & NEW PPTN

Looking at existing pptn. Expanding PPTN to meet the new proposed acs and connect them to each other and to new acs. This is because we want people from each 20 minute neighbourhood (AC) to be able to connect to others in this 20 min AC neighbourhood network affordable amenity.

IDENTIFYING EXISTING RENTAL PROPERTIES WITHIN NEW & EXISTING ACS

WHY?

Existing rentals are not affordable, & social housing is on a rentable business model. We can purchase lots with existing rentals & place on them (through amalgemating adjacent lots) new social housing model. Existing tenants get access to these new dwellings. Incentives for land lords to sell investment properties to the government & have access to social housing amenity.

CONVERT 30% OF THESE EXISTING LOTS INTO SOCIAL HOUSING

WHY?

To ensure we not only achieve, but exceed the supply for the projected demand for social housiing within Brimbank & within our social housing model. Tenants could wither live in these dwellings for the rest of their lifetime, or after 40 years or so move out to permanent/ single dwellings for the remainder of their lives. It creates a sustainable housing cycle - A closed-loop housing system. Tenants may also move to a neighbouring 20 min neighbourhood ACs if they choose. They can be assure that they will receive the same quality of life & housing & affordability in new neighbourhood.

549


SCALAR THINKING_

>

MACRO

LGAs & Greater Melbourne transport network

connecting neighbourhoods

550

Introduction of mixed use public realm spaces i.e. hybrid typologies such as hospitals, zoos, museum, art galleries


>

MESO

Suburb / Neighbourhood / Precinct / Activity Centre

percentage of social housing within 20 minute neighbourhoods

Mixed-Use Amenity typologies Activity Centres / dispursal of building typologies

MICRO

Building Typologies

Hybrid Typologies

Social Housing / Small Scale Amenities

551


552


ARCHITECTURE IN CONTEXT_ In week 10, we were tasked with an “in-class� study exercise for those of us wanting to enter the FHSC. This task asked us to look at different site amalgamations as a quick testing exercise. At this time, I had been looking into what potential grasshopper plugins were available for us to potentially use for studio, as I had also been taking another unit that used Grasshopper as one of its main programs - from this I found a couple of different plugins that I tested out before deciding that due to our group coming from a social approach to our LiveAble housing this was not the right time to use these plugins. Team 4 had also come up with a microscale approach that we wanted to use to our design outcome for bothe the FHSC and studio. From these outcomes, and as part of this Architecture in Context, I played with both the amalgamation of lots that we could use and the composition of the dwellings on those lots to test the different circulation and edge conditions that can come from different forms.

553


MICRO SCALE APPROACH_

554


555


SOCIAL HOUSING TYPOLOGIES | ARCHITECTURAL MASSING STUDIES_

556


557


SOCIAL HOUSING TYPOLOGIES | SITE AMALGAMATION STUDIES_

2_3_4 Lot Building Envelopes

558


Culs de Sac Amalgamations

559


SOCIAL HOUSING TYPOLOGIES | GROUND FLOOR DWELLING+SITE AMALGAMATION STUDIES_

560


561


SOCIAL HOUSING TYPOLOGIES | INTERNAL CIRCULATION MOOD BOARD_ Universal Design Principles_ Equitable use: the design is useful & relevant to a wide group of end-users Flexibility in use: the design accommodates a wide range of individual preferences & abilities Simple and intuitive use: the design is easy to understand regardless of the knowledge, experience, language skills or concentration level of the end-user Perceptive information: the design communicates information effectively to the user regardless of the ambient condition or the sensory abilities of the end-user Tolerance for error: the design minimizes the hazards and adverse consequences of unintended actions by the end-user Low physical effort: the design can be used easily, efficiently, & comfortably with a minimum of fatigue Size and space: the size and space for approach, reach, manipulation, & use should be appropriate regardless of the body size, posture, or mobility of the end-user

Project : 26 Apartments in Montreuil_Social Housing Architect : Benjamin Fleury

562


CAN WE IMPLEMENT THE SAME PATH CIRCULATION INTO THE PUBLIC REALM ?

Project : Kingborough Village_Woolstore Architect : DNA Architects

Project : Viettel Academy Educational Center Architect : VTN Architects

563


564


SPACE, FORM & USE AT MULTIPLE SCALES_ Throughout our design process we decided to create several surveys as a conscious effort to get a community engagement understanding about social housing that we would not otherwise get. I also looked further at what amenity makes up a 20-minute neighbourhood and what amenities have more of 40-minute city element to them; what types of amenity we will be implementing to our 20-minute neighbourhoods, if they do not already have these amenities provided. Parallel to these micro and meso scale investigations, we refined exactly what elements we are using in order to find our 20-minute neighbourhoods, as well as the strategy that we planned on taking from a strategic, statutory and spatial approach.

565


STRATEGY_

ACTIVITY CENTRES Major & Neighbourhood

566

RESIDENTIAL ZONES

GRZ + MUZ + LDRZ + NRZ + RGZ

INCLUSIONARY ZONES 1/3 = MIZ > Live-Able Housing


LIVEABILITY ELEMENTS_

SNAMUTS

PPRZ

PRIMARY SCHOOLS

PPTN

ACTIVITY CENTRES

567


VEHICLE BARRIERS/CONNECTIONS_

PREFERRED VEHICLE TRAFFIC ROUTES

568


569


POTENTIAL AMENITIES_ 20 Minute Neighbourhoods • Library

• Hospital

• Medical Centre

• Museum

• Community Centre

• Town Hall

• Place of Worship • Event Venue • Childcares

• Kindergartens • Police Station

• Specialist Medical Centre • Charities • Studios • ATM

• Post Office • Bus Stops

• Railway Station • Open Space

570

40 Minute Cities

• Courthouse • Prison

• Wildlife Centre

• Government Buildings • Fire Station? • Cinema • Offices • Bank

• University


SNAMUTS_ We were only able to get SNAMUTS dataset from 2016, however, besides Sunshine & some parts of Darebin there doesn’t seem

to be much change in the Composite Accessibility Index:

So in areas where there isn’t an above average SNAMUTS Composite Accessibility Index we will be using a walkscore of 70+.

571


MICRO SCALE INTERVENTIONS_

572


573


574


PLANNING LAW, STRATEGIC & STATUTORY PLANNING_ In week 11, we had a cross-unit session with Guest Lecturer Stephen Glackin from our Planning Law, Strategic & Statutory Planning Unit. In this unit, Team 4’s members Paris Triantis, Arsen Sarkisian and myself, have been working in collaboration with our studio proposals on a Planning Report in order to investigate what needs to happen from an urban planning perspective in order for our proposal to be successful. As part of this in-class session, Paris, Arsen and myself pitched what our plans for both our Planning Report and our 20-minute neighbourhood LiveAble Places studio proposal was. The feedback we received allowed us to revise how we are going to tackle the zoning and overlays of our 20-minute neighbourhoods by informing as that instead of propositioning the introduction of mandatory inclusionary zoning that we had initially intended to do, we should look re-zoning our 20-minute neighbourhoods to already existing zones and then implementing provisions such as Community Land Trusts to our neighbourhoods. This session also allowed us to zoom in even further to one precinct of our case study Deer Park 20-minute neighbourhood that we were investigating; a precinct that we named Cairnlea Park Precinct [as it falls within the suburbs of Cairnlea and Deer Park].

575


576


577


BEFORE | PLANNING SCHEME OVERLAYS_

DCPO DPO EAO ESO_Schedule 4

ESO_Schedule 6 HO LSIO SBO

578


579


580


581


BEFORE | PLANNING SCHEME ZONES_

Commercial 1 Zone General Residential Zone Neighbourhood Residential Zone

Public Conservation & Resource Public Park & Recreation Zone Public Use Zone_Education

Public Use Zone_Service & Utility

582


583


DEER PARK | 3D CASE STUDY MODEL & LOTS_ » Deer Park 20 Minute Neighbourhood of a broader Brimbank Contextual Model I created_

584


585


AERIAL_

Cairnlea Park Precinct

586


587


YEAR BUILT_

1970s 1980s 1990s 2000s 2010s

588


589


BUILDING HEIGHTS_

3m = 180 dwgs 4m = 169 dwgs 5m = 72 dwgs 6m = 84 dwgs 7m = 26 dwgs 8m = 1 dwgs

590


591


FOOTPATHS_

Footpaths

592


593


BICYCLE NETWORK_

On Road Off Road

594


595


CONTAMINATED LAND_

Not Contaminated Contaminated

596


597


598


FUTURE HOMES STUDENT COMPETITION_ In the week beginning 9th November 2020, myself and the rest of Team 4 [Megan Murray, Arsen Sarkisian and Paris Triantis] entered our LiveAble Housing proposal into the FHSC. The following pages show a snippet of what our competition entry looked like - with the rest of the competition entry in th Final Presentation chapter. This entry included a number of micro scale elements that we investigated including materiality, fixture and fittings that had a Green Star Rating, WERS Star Rating, GreenTag certificate and/or Australian Made. We proposed using copper fixtures as they are anti-microbial, which is inline with sanitation trends that have comeabout as a response to the Covid-19 pandemic. Although we wish that we were able to enter more of our multiscalar proposition into the competition, we are very pleased and proud of our competition entry. This pride has only been heightened by a panellist at our final studio presentation asking whether we had entered the FHSC as this exactly the kind of project that the competition looks for.

599


PRECINCT ITERATIONS

BRIEF

LiveAble Housing is a project that has manifested from an in depth analysis into Victoria’s shortfall in quality, affordable housing within 20-minute neighbourhoods. LiveAble Housing is something that should be a choice to not only those who meet the requirements but to anyone who wants to lead a liveable lifestyle within a 20 minute neighbourhood & 40 minute city. A lifestyle that is for the long-term, and is accessible, inclusive, & sustainable with a wide diversity of people, places, & amenities - all within walking distance. Thus, our goal is to have every 1 in 3 dwellings to be some sort of LiveAble Housing. Cairnlea Park LiveAble Development Strategy & Precinct Proposal is our strategic, statutory & spatial response to our LiveAble Housing design proposal, in which we have been investigating high amenity, affordable, medium density housing alternatives to enhance Melbourne’s 20-minute neighbourhood goals. Our built form is a direct response to both celebrating the successful components of the six-pack-flat with contemporary treatment, and to challenging urban sprawl of the quarter acre block by providing a series of modular apartment layouts for families of all sizes. For cost and efficiency in delivery a greater density of social housing stock to Melbourne, each apartment is prefabricated locally and then transported to site, meaning that apartments can be individually configured to suit a range of different site contexts and compositions. We have created this LiveAble Housing Cairnlea Park precinct, as we believe that this site typifies our goal to promote greater densification of Melbourne’s middlering suburbs with enhanced access to amenity, through focussing specifically on permeability and connection. As a direct response to the brief, we have sought to challenge the notion of reducing the stigma surrounding affordable [social] housing through a design that seeks to foster community and serendipitous social interactions between residents at every level. To achieve this, our apartment sizes are configured more spaciously than the minimum standards for apartment design inform.

600


PUBLIC REALM ITERATIONS

ARCHITECTURAL ITERATIONS

601


MATERIALS INTERNAL / EXTERNAL WALLS

WALLS & CEILING

AUSTRAL PRECAST PANEL BRICK

GTEK FIRE & WET AREA PLASTERBOARD

200MM DOUBLE WALL

10MM THICKNESS

AGED RED 4.5 NABHERS | 5 GCBA

602

GECA CERT.

WALLS & CEILING

INSULATION

FLOORS/TILES

KINGSPAN GREENGUARD GG700

BOTTEGA CALIZA SLIP RESISTANT

80MM THICKNESS

CONCRETE LOOK

600 MAX CENTRES

XPS

1200X600MM TILE

GBCA STAR SCHEME

0 ODP | LOW GWP

GREENRATE LEVEL A

STUDCO STEEL STUD WALL & CEILING


FLOORS

FLOORS

WINDOWS

DOORS

ENTRANCE DOORS

ROOFING

BCG POLISHED CONCRETE

AFFINITY POLYFLOR PUR FINISH

PVC DOUBLE-GLAZED WINDOWS

PVC DOUBLE-GLAZED DOORS

SCS UPVC 88PLUS DOORS

BIO SOLAR GREEN ROOF

7MM AGGREGATE

STRAIGHT LAID PLANK

TILT & TURN/STACKER

TILT & TURN/STACKER

MODEL 6860

WATER RETENTION

C219

CHAMPAGNE OAK 9785

WHITE

WHITE

CREMEWEISS

400MM THICK SOIL

3 STAR GCBA

GREEN TAG CERT.

WERS STAR RATED

WERS STAR RATED

WERS STAR RATED

LOW UHI

603


FIXTURES BATHROOM

INTERNAL LIGHTING

604

LIGHTING

LIGHTING

DOOR HANDLES

TOILET

BRIGHT GREEN P900 CURVE

BRIGHT GREEN D900.SHX

BRIGHT GREEN D2000-CR

FURNIPART HANDLE COMMON

CAROMA CARE 800 CLEANFLUSH

LED PENDANT LIGHT

LED SPOTLIGHT

LED DOWNLIGHT

ANTIMICROBIAL

MEETS AS1428.1

WHITE

WHITE

WHITE

ANTIQUE COPPER

WHITE

16.5W | 27° BEAM ∠

16.5W | 27° BEAM ∠

30W | 55° BEAM ∠

ACCESSIBLE D HANDLE

WELS 4 STAR RATED


TAPS

BASIN

TOILET ROLL HOLDER

VODA SINK MIXER CURVED

LIANO NEXUS INSET BASIN

VODA TOILET ROLL HOLDER

ANTIMICROBIAL

FITTING WASTE PLUG

BRUSHED COPPER WELS 4 STAR RATED

TOWEL RAIL

SHOWER SET

SHOWER SCREEN

VODA TOWEL RAIL DOUBLE 900MM

VODA TWIN RAIL SHOWER

CREATIVE GLASS FRAMELESS FIXED

ANTIMICROBIAL

ANTIMICROBIAL

WITH OVERHEAD

2100 H X 1100 W

WHITE

BRUSHED COPPER

BRUSHED COPPER

BRUSHED COPPER

POLISHED CHROME

5L CAPACITY

AUSTRALIAN MADE

AUSTRALIAN MADE

WELS 3 STAR RATED

10MM A/S THICKNESS

605


FINISHES BATHROOM [CONT.] BATH TUB

606

KITCHEN MIRRORS

TAPS

INTERNAL SINK

PAINT

LIANO 1525 FREESTANDING BATH

TALL MIRRORED CABINET

VODA SINK MIXER PULL OUT

LUNA DOUBLE BOWL O/M & U/M

WATTYL I.D. ANTIQUE WHITE USA

1525X 700X440MM

WALL MOUNTED

ANTIMICROBIAL

SINGLE BY–PASS KIT

FULL / SEMI GLOSS /

WHITE

5MM THICKNESS

BRUSHED COPPER

POLISHED CHROME

FLAT FINISH

305L CAPACITY

900 X 1100 X 150MM

WELS 5 STAR RATED

SINGLE & DOUBLE

1 STAR GCBA


BATHROOM CABINETRY

BLINDS

VANITIES

KITCHEN CABINETRY

BENCHTOPS

SPLASHBACKS

AUSTRAL MARINE AAA PLYWOOD

HELIOSCREEN INTERNAL BLACKOUT

LAMINEX ESSASTONE ENGINEERED STONE

LAMINEX DECORATED MDF

DURANGO BONE CERAMIC

LAMINEX ESSASTONE ENGINEERED STONE

AS/NZS 2272

HELIOGREEN CALAIS

20MM THICKNESS

WALLS | SEMI GLOSS

RECTIFIED EDGE

20MM THICKNESS

19MM THICKNESS

SILVER LF & BO

CAOLINO MATT

RAW BIRCHPLY

CUSTOM FIT

WHITE CONCRETE

2 POINT GBCA

1 STAR GCBA

GBCA STAR SCHEME

GREENRATE LEVEL A

GREENRATE LEVEL A

GBCA STAR SCHEME

607


CHALLENGING THE PROVISIONS

In order to allow for Plan Melbourne’s 20-minute neighbourhoods strategy to come to fruition amendments to the current Brimbank City Council Planning Scheme [2020] need to be made so as to accommodate the urban infrastructure necessary. These amendments have come out of research done in order to identify Greater Melbourne’s existing 20-minute neighbourhoods as according to Caroline Whitzman’s liveability indicators:

“live in appropriate housing, within walking, cycling or rapid and reliable public transport distance to employment and education, social and health services, healthy food, and good quality public openspace” [Whitzman, C. et al, 2012]

608


609


CONCEPTUAL MASTERPLAN SITE IN CONTEXT

610


SITE PLAN PINEWOOD CRESCENT - BLACKWOOD COURT

611


GROUND FLOOR PLAN 4-LOT AMALGAMATION 1:200 @A2

612


FIRST FLOOR PLAN 4-LOT AMALGAMATION 1:200 @A2

SECOND FLOOR PLAN 4-LOT AMALGAMATION 1:200@A2

613


ROOF PLAN RENDERED PERSPECTIVE

614


MARKETPLACE SNAPSHOTS OF LIFE

SUNDAY AFTERNOON SNAPSHOTS OF LIFE

PERMACULTURE SNAPSHOTS OF LIFE

RESIDENT COURTYARD SNAPSHOTS OF LIFE

615


NORTH ELEVATION 1:125 @ A2

616


EAST ELEVATION 1:75 @ A2

617


SECTION A | EAST-WEST SECTION SOUTH FACING

SECTION B | EAST-WEST SECTION NORTH FACING

SECTION C | NORTH-SOUTH SECTION WEST FACING

618


2 BEDROOM APARTMENT GROUND - FIRST FLOOR

3 BEDROOM APARTMENT GROUND - FIRST FLOOR

GROSS FLOOR AREA: 96M2

GROSS FLOOR AREA: 121M2

INTERNAL AREA: 82M2

INTERNAL AREA: 110M2

EXTERNAL AREA: 14M2

EXTERNAL AREA: 11M2

619


620

1 BEDROOM APARTMENT SECOND FLOOR

4 BEDROOM APARTMENT GROUND - SECOND FLOOR

GROSS FLOOR AREA: 48M2

GROSS FLOOR AREA: 120M2

INTERNAL AREA: 40M2

INTERNAL AREA: 111M2

EXTERNAL AREA: 8M2

EXTERNAL AREA: 9M2


STUDIO APARTMENT SECOND FLOOR

5 BEDROOM APARTMENT GROUND - FIRST FLOOR

GROSS FLOOR AREA: 39M2

GROSS FLOOR AREA: 154M2

INTERNAL AREA: 29M2

INTERNAL AREA: 138M2

EXTERNAL AREA: 10M2

EXTERNAL AREA: 16M2

621


INTERNAL PERSPECTIVE COMFORTABLE CENTRAL LIVING SPACE

622


623


624


FINAL PRESENTATION_ The following pages is Team 4’s Final Presentation for Design Research Studio B / C_Zoomburbia 2.0!. Our project is called LiveAble Places. For our Final Presentation, we took a very collaborative approach to our LiveAble Places proposal as we believe this created the best outcomes. It also meant that all of us had some kind of input into every element of our project from LiveAble Urbanity and LiveAble Environments, to LiveAble Movements and LiveAble Housing. Team 4 now has a strong interest in seeing LiveAble Housing and the issue of social housing stock within Metropolitan Melbourne. We have a good understanding of what urban planning interventions need to happen in order for our proposal to come to fruition, and also areas such as how our proposal would spatially look in other contexts of Melbourne that we are keen to continue investigating. I have really enjoyed this semester and the topic we investigated - I am thankful for the effort and motivation my fellow Team 4 members have given to our proposal and have really gained a lot from having Dr. Ian Woodcock as Unit Convenor to help guide us through this design process.

625


INCLUSIVE

SUSTAINABLE

LIVEABLE PLACES AFFORDABLE

626

20 MINUTE NEIGHBOURHOODS

ACTIVE & SOCIAL LIFESTYLES


627


DRIVING CONCEPT “live in appropriate housing, within walking, cycling or rapid and reliable public transport distance to employment and education, social and health services, healthy food, and good quality public open space� [Whitzman, C. et al, 2012]

628


20 MINUTE TYPOLOGICAL ELEMENTS_

Public Transport | PPTN 400m Catchment

Primary School | 400m Catchment

Amenity | ACZ CZ MUZ & Activity Centres

Walkability | 70+ Score Rating & SNAMUTS

Open Space | PPRZ 400m Catchment

629


20 MINUTE NEIGHBOURHOODS_

23.27%

20 Minute Neighbourhoods / Urban Growth Boundary

20 Minute Neighbourhoods

630


631


SELECTED LOTS = FHSC 643M2 +/- 10%_

62,097 Number of Lots

6.5

Dwellings/Lot

Redeveloped Lots Empty Lots

58,513 3,584

60,128

Replaced Dwellings

343,503 / 3996 HA Total Net Dwelling Density in Ha [Rounded]

632


633


DWELLING DENSITY CHANGE_

12 DWGS / HA Net

86 DWGS / HA Net

634


DEMOGRAPHIC CHANGE_

2.7 Average Household

people [ABS]

>

5.7x 162,346

people within 20 minute neighbourhoods

927,457

people within 20 minute neighbourhoods

635


EXISTING RESIDENTIAL ZONING_ 995 HA 471 HA Residential Growth Zones

Mixed Use Zones

6,405 HA

General Residential Zones

14,162 HA

Neighbourhood Residential Zones

636


637


PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL ZONING_ 1,466 HA

Unchanged

20,567 HA Re-Zoned

638


639


PLANNING SUPPORT IMPLEMENTATION_ As LiveAble Housing providers, we are a not-for-profit organisation. The following implementation plan outlines legislative changes needed to enable us to implement our housing and amenity over the next 30 years and beyond.

640


641

COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT AND FEEDBACK DURING ALL PHASES


642

Community engagement large part of stakeholder engagement & management in the blue phase. Continues throughout all phases. Co-creation workshops, interviews, prototypes & testing will provide insights on community need for affordable social housing & preferences for this type of housing.

2022-2023

2021-2022

PLANNING SUPPORT IMPLEMENTATION_

Amendments made to VPP & Brimbank’s planning scheme to initially be voluntary & recommended in yellow phase. Incremental change. Incentivising community housing providers through government funding and support. Feedback from community engagement strongly shows the need for affordable social housing in Metropolitan Melbourne. This will cause a shift towards funding for affordable housing [especially post-covid-19].


2030 AND BEYOND

BEYOND 2050

After the voluntary amendments are successful in Cairnlea, Brimbank & most of Metropolitan Melbourne, the Provisions would be further amended to be made mandatory, so as to ensure Melbourne never fall below the social housing stock line in future, thus ensuring secure futures for all melbournians, clear processes for planning & development for CHPs and better housing for all.

Cairnlea Park precinct to run successful pilot of voluntary liveable housing in 20 minute neighbourhood by 2025. Brimbank to to reach sustainable annual stock of liveable housing [1 in 3] by 2050. After 2050, Metropolitan Melbourne to aim for same model at Brimbank. This is subject to change, as other municipalities may start their liveable housing pilots earlier if pilot is very successful in Brimbank.

643


LIVEABLE HOUSING IMPLEMENTATION ROADMAP_

644


2050

BEYOND

BEYOND

BEYOND

GREATER MELBOURNE

BEYOND

BEYOND 645


FURTHER INVESTIGATION_

646


647


3 TYPICAL SUBURBAN LOTS L SUBURBAN LOTS SIDE-BY-SIDE IDE GROUND FLOOR PLAN I SCALE 1:200 @A2 21 DWELLINGS NGS 2. 2. 2. 2. 2.

+

+

FLOOR PLANS

+

4 TYPICAL SUBURBAN LOTS SIDE-BY-SIDE/ BACK-TO-BACK 28 DWELLINGS

=

+

2 X COMMUNITY SPACE 8 X DWELLINGS

GROUND FLOOR PLAN I SCALE 1:200 2.

648

2.

+

+

2.

+

2.

+

2.

=

2 X COMMUNITY SPACE 8 X DWELLINGS


GROUND PLAN FIRST FLOOR PLAN I FLOOR SCALE 1:200 @A2 2.

2. 2.

2.

2.

2.

I SCALE 1:200 2.

2.

2.

+ + + + + + + +

2.

2 X COMMUNITY 2 X COMMUNITY SPACE 8 X DWELLINGS 8 X DWELLINGS

= =

SPACE

FIRST FLOOR PLAN I SCALE 1:200 2.

2.

+

+

2.

+

2.

+

2.

=

2 X COMMUNITY SPACE 8 X DWELLINGS

649


SECOND FLOOR PLAN I SCALE 1:200 @A2

2.

4.

+

650

+

4.

+

2.

=

2 X COMMUNITY SPACE 10 X DWELLINGS


ROOF FLOOR PLAN I SCALE 1:200 @A2

651


ROOF PLAN RENDERED PERSPECTIVE

652


SITE PLAN 9AM SHADOW CAST SPRING EQUINOX

0

20m

653


SITE PLAN 12PM SHADOW CAST SPRING EQUINOX

0

654

20m


SITE PLAN 3PM SHADOW CAST SPRING EQUINOX

0

20m

655


2 BEDROOM APARTMENT GROUND - FIRST FLOOR

GROSS FLOOR AREA: 96M2 INTERNAL AREA: 82M2 EXTERNAL AREA: 14M2

656


3 BEDROOM APARTMENT GROUND - FIRST FLOOR

GROSS FLOOR AREA: 121M2 INTERNAL AREA: 110M2 EXTERNAL AREA: 11M2

657


1 BEDROOM APARTMENT SECOND FLOOR

GROSS FLOOR AREA: 48M2 INTERNAL AREA: 40M2 EXTERNAL AREA: 8M2

658


4 BEDROOM APARTMENT GROUND - SECOND FLOOR

GROSS FLOOR AREA: 120M2 INTERNAL AREA: 111M2 EXTERNAL AREA: 9M2

659


STUDIO APARTMENT SECOND FLOOR

GROSS FLOOR AREA: 39M2 INTERNAL AREA: 29M2 EXTERNAL AREA: 10M2

GROSS FLOOR AREA: 39M2 INTERNAL AREA: 29M2 EXTERNAL AREA: 10M2

660


5 BEDROOM APARTMENT GROUND - FIRST FLOOR

GROSS FLOOR AREA: 154M2 INTERNAL AREA: 138M2 EXTERNAL AREA: 16M2

661


TYPICAL APARTMENT ENTRANCE RENDERED PERSPECTIVE

662


TYPICAL APARTMENT BEDROOM RENDERED PERSPECTIVE

663


TYPICAL APARTMENT LIVING RENDERED PERSPECTIVE

664


TYPICAL APARTMENT ENSUITE RENDERED PERSPECTIVE

665


MODULAR DESIGN PREFAB APPLICATION

WATERPROOFING SHIPLAP

666


MODULAR DESIGN ADAPTABLE SPACES

MODULAR DESIGN REPLICABLE CONSTRUCTION

667


SECTIONS_

SECTION C | NORTH-SOUTH SECTION WEST FACING 1:200 @A2

668


SECTION A | EAST-WEST SECTION SOUTH FACING 1:200 @A2

SECTION B | EAST-WEST SECTION NORTH FACING 1:200 @A2

669


EAST ELEVATION 1:100 @A2

670


EAST ELEVATION 1:100 @A2

671


RESIDENTIAL TYPOLOGIES_ TYPICAL SINGLE LOT AMALGAMATION 7 DWELLINGS

672

TYPICAL 2 LOT SIDE BY SIDE AMALGAMATION 14 DWELLINGS


TYPICAL 2 LOT SIDE BY SIDE AMALGAMATION 21 DWELLINGS

TYPICAL 4 LOT SIDE BY SIDE AMALGAMATION 28 DWELLINGS

673


AMENITY TYPOLOGIES_

• fresh food producers • fruit markets / grocers • offices for local job opportunities • cultural / entertainment amenities • post office • pharmacy • dentist • medical specialists

674

TWO CORNERS

GROUND FLOOR

L-SHAPE_1/4


U-SHAPE_1/2

TWO GROUPS OF AMENITIES

FOUR GROUPS OF AMENITIES

675


ARCHITECTURAL TYPOLOGIES_

TYPICAL SINGLE LOT AMALGAMATION

676

TYPICAL 3 LOT AMALGAMATION


TYPICAL 2 LOT SIDE BY SIDE AMALGAMATION

TYPICAL 3 LOT SIDE BY SIDE AMALGAMATION

677


INTERNAL CIRCULATION SOCIAL INTERACTIONS

678


INTERSTITIAL FACADE SLIDING SHADING

679


PERMIABLE ROOFTOPS COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT

680


LENSE FLARE AMBIENT CORNER PRIVATE SPACES

681


HABITAT CAFE AFFORDABLE FOOD OPTIONS

682


LITTLE LIVEABLES CHILDCARE AMENITY

683


LIVEABLE HOUSING COMMUNITY

684


685


686


687


PROGRAM DESIGN FOR RESIDENTS AND SNAPSHOTS OF LIFE_

A COMMUNITY LED LITTLE BOOKSTORE & LITTLE KITCHEN FOOD AND BOOKS PROVIDED BY THE PUBLIC & RESIDENTS. INTENDED TO BE FREE TO THOSE IN NEED OF ASSISTANCE DUE TO HOUSEHOLD STRESS. SUNDAY FRESH FOOD & GOODS MARKET FOOD EXCHANGE, BOOK EXCHANGE AND CLOTHES EXCHANGE.

688

RUN BY RESIDENTS TO ENSURE MORE SUSTAINABLE DISPOSAL OF UNUSED BOOKS

LITTLE LIVEABLES A TYPICAL WEEKDAY AT THE GROUND FLOOR LOCAL CORNER CHILDCARE.


RESIDENTS SIT IN THEIR PRIVATE COURTYARD ON THE GROUND FLOOR. SUN GENTLY EASES INTO THE SPACE, PROVIDING WARMTH.

COMMUNITY GARDEN GARDENING WORKSHOPS ON A WEDNESDAY MORNING

A TYPICAL WEEKEND ALONG THE CAR FREE ADJACENT ZONES TO THE LIVEABLE HOUSING COMPLEX. OUTDOOR ACTIVITIES FOR FAMILIES.

689


SUSTAINABILITY | SOLAR POWER AND GREEN ROOFS ON ARCHITECTURE_ water tanks on rooftops on level 2 roof to ensure rainwater is captured and reused in gardens.

solar panels on green roofs to ensure maintained temperature range between 15-25 degrees using cooling effects of grass and planting

green roof 500 thickness to ensure cooling during summer months and rainwater capture for use in gardens. cooling of rooftops keeps interiors cool, and keeps rooftops cool. more energy efficienct, less energy related costs for residents. more affordable and comfortable living.

690


691


SUSTAINABILITY | FOOD, BOOKS, ORGANIC WASTE - ADAPTIVE REUSE_

VARIOUS MARKETS ON SUNDAYS FOR CLOTHES EXCHANGE, FOOD EXCHANGE, LOW-COST FOOD OPTIONS, GOODS EXCHANGE FOOD STALLS LOTS OF PRODUCE COMES FROM THE COMMUNITY FRUIT AND VEGETABLE GARDEN; FREE TO ALL

692


RESIDENT COMMUNITY ORGANIC GARDEN RESIDENTS PLANT SEEDS, ATTEND WEEKLY GARDENING WORKSHOPS AND HARVEST PRODUCE FOR MARKETS AND FOR PERSONAL USE

WORM FARM MODULES FROM COMPOST REVOLUTION

RESIDENTS PLACE ORGANIC WASTE IN FARM. FARM PROCESSES UP TO 2L OF ORGANIC WASTE WEEKLY, AND CONTAINS TWO TRAYS FOR CONTINUOUS FLOW OF LIQUID FERTILISER AND WORM CASTINGS. CLOSED-LOOP FOOD WASTE SYSTEM.

693


LIVEABLE HOUSING | CHANGING AFFORDABLE HOUSING_

694


695


รท

BRIMBANK 20 MINUTE NEIGHBOURHOODS_

73,911

Brimbank Projected Total Dwellings

1/3

Social Housing Aim

2,062

Existing Social Housing

22,575

Needed Additional Social Housing Dwellings

20 Minute Neighbourhoods Chosen 20 Minute Neighbourhood

696


697


รท

DEER PARK | NET DWELLINGS PER HECTARE_

3518

Number of Dwellings

197.59 HA

Total Net Residential Area in Ha

18 DWG / HA

Total Net Dwelling Density in Ha [Rounded]

LOTS

1 Dwg 2 Dwg 3 Dwg 4 Dwg

698

3418 28 8 5


699


DEER PARK | NET DWELLINGS PER HECTARE [MAX YIELD]_

3518

Number of Properties

7,631

Additional Dwellings [6.5 Dwellings/Lot]

Redeveloped Lots Empty Lots

1104 70

1,108

Replaced Dwellings

33 DWG / HA [6,523 DWG] Total Net Dwelling Density in Ha [Rounded]

700


701


DEER PARK | CAIRNLEA PARK PRECINCT LIVEABLE DEVELOPMENT PILOT_

Deer Park 20 Minute Neighbourhood Cairnlea Park Precinct LiveAble Development Pilot

702


703


SUBURBS_

Cairnlea Deer Park

704


705


CURRENT ZONES_

NRZ C1Z GRZ PPRZ PUZ2

706


707


PROPOSED ZONES_

RGZ C1Z MUZ PPRZ PUZ2

708


709


STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMEMT WITH BRIMBANK CITY COUNCIL_ SEMI-STRUCTURED ZOOM INTERVIEW

QUESTIONS ASKED

1. How does Brimbank city council aim for make housing more affordable for its residents? 2. How have you seen covid-19 impact local government stance on social housing supply? 3. Is Brimbank city council in support of the legislation proposed by the greens for greater densification of

affordable housing stock? How does it compare and contrast to the Brimbank LGA strategy? 4. What dwelling type and amenity for social housing supply is Brimbank council focused on delivering? 5. When new affordable housing is approved/ proposed by Brimbank council, how much is the sites

proximity to amenity and public transport a consideration? 6. Currently around 8% of Melbournians on the social housing waitlist are waiting for housing they become

available within Brimbank, how does this compare to the current Brimbank proposal for delivery of dwellings? 7. What will be the key challenges for housing and supporting projected population growth in Brimbank

over the coming years? 8. Are there any plans for that massive site on deer park that’s unused? 9. How would Brimbank feel about our proposal (the key changes that you guys proposed in your planning

report) for enhancing amenity around a densification of affordable housing? 10. 10. What would be the failures/ unachievables of this proposal?

710


STRATEGIC PLANNER KEY POINTS FROM INTERVIEW • The ability to add affordable housing, even if there a restrictions on amenity and services within the area • Big challenges with stakeholders, and community perception when it comes to affordable housing section 173 agreement that highlights critical things to be signed on from parties • Position statements as common methods for gaining approval for building affordable housing, lots of examples of this • Community engagement and collaboration is very important • Ideal to have voluntary provisions for affordable housing, as it is controversial to mandate currently in melbourne • Voluntary provisions can be confusing, and as such somtimes developers do not interpret the provisions correctly or choose to ignore (or overlook) • Strategy has to look at the next 30 years • Based off local council laws • Translation of all planning schemes across melbourne happening now • Findings from affordable housing community liasing show that overwhelmingly home owners were opposed to affordable housing being built around them, wheras home renters were less opposed • Can’t mandate the provision of affordable housing, its a voluntary negotiation process • Request an affordable housing contribution within some zones and overlay clauses within some zones and overlay clauses

711


STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMEMT WITH BRIMBANK CITY COUNCIL_ UNSTRUCTURED PHONE INTERVIEW

STATUTORY PLANNER KEY POINTS FROM INTERVIEW • • • • • • •

• •

712

Increase bus frequency Look into the contamination in cairnlea History of cairnlea; former amunition production Original development plan overlay is from the 80s/90s Look into section 173 for ways we can provide guidelines to our housing Look into ardern as a precedent for affordable housing We want to be developing in an activity centre zone, mixed use zone or residential growrth zone, not neighbourhood residential or general residential We need to know who owns land and how we can purchase/what we can purchase Incremental changes rather than radical


MOVEMENT & PAUSE HUMAN SCALE TRANSIT

713


SELECTED LOTS_

251

Number of Lots

6.5

Dwellings/Lot

Redeveloped Lots Empty Lots Untouched

232 19 336

232

Replaced Dwellings

30 DWGS / HA [1,400 DWGS] Total Net Dwelling Density in Ha [Rounded]

714


715


EXISTING AMENITIES_

Fast Food x1 Retail & Fast Food x3

Kindergarten x1

Primary School x2 Mechanic x1 Petrol x1 Recreational Facility x1 Medical Centre x2

Community Hub x1 Library x1

Place of Worship x1

716


717


STREET REALM TYPOLOGIES_

ONE WAY ROAD

GREENERY PEDESTRIAN BIKE PATH

718


STATION ROAD

BUS INTERCHANGE AT STATION ROAD

719


720 1.5 2.2 3.3 1.5 1.85 1.85m

NATURE STRIP CAR PARK

ONE WAY LANE

NATURE STRIP BIKE PATH FOOTPATH

PARK

1.85m 1.85

BIKE PATH

FOOTPATH

PINEWOOD CRESCENT 16M


1.85m 1.85 1.5

BIKE PATH NATURE STRIP

1.85 1.85m FOOTPATH

1.5 BIKE PATH

NATURE STRIP

GREENERY STRIP

FOOTPATH

16M BLACKWOOD CIRCUIT

721


722 3.9 2.2 3.3 3.3 5.0 3.3

CAR PARK 1

CAR LANE 1A

CAR LANE 1B

ISLAND 1

CAR LANE 2A

3.3 3.3 4.0 NATURE STRIP

2.7 FOOTPATH

BIKE PATH

5.1 CAR LANE 3A (ONE WAY LANE)

2.2 ISLAND 2

CAR PARK 2

CAR LANE 2B

2.7

NATURE STRIP

2m

BIKE PATH

FOOTPATH

STATION ROAD_50.6m

STATION ROAD 50.6M

2m


5.0 3.3 3.3 3.0 4.0 NATURE STRIP

PARK

2.7 FOOTPATH

BIKE PATH

3.0 SHARED PATH

3.5 BUS STOP 2

BUS STOP LANE 2

CAR LANE 2B

3.3

CAR LANE 2A

NATURE STRIP + BUS STOP 1

3.3

ISLAND 1

BIKE PATH

3.5

CAR LANE 1B

3.9

CAR LANE 1A

2.7

BUS STOP LANE 1

2m

FOOTPATH

NEW INTERCHANGE AT STATION ROAD 50.6M

2m

723


PRECINCT PROPOSED TRANSIT NETWORK_

Vehicular Movement

Bike Paths & Footpaths

724


725


NEIGHBOURHOOD PROPOSED TRANSIT NETWORK_

Vehicular Movement

Bike Paths & Footpaths

726


727


CURRENT BUS TIMETABLES_

420 423 420 = ~1/20 mins peak & inter-peak 423 = ~1/30 mins peak & 1/40 mins inter-peak 942 = 1/hr x 5hrs Saturdays & 1/hr x 6hrs Sunday

728


729


PROPOSED BUS TIMETABLES_

420 423 420 = ~1/10 mins peak & inter-peak 423 = ~1/10 mins peak & inter-peak 942 = 1/30 mins x 6hrs Saturdays & Sundays

730


731


BUS STOP SHELTER DESIGN INTERVENTION_ BOX GUTTER

COMMUNAL LIBRARY/ FOOD PROGRAM

SOLAR PANELS

BIKE STORAGE

SHELTER

PERMEABLE CONCRETE BIKE RACK

732


733


SUSTAINABILITY | TREE CANOPY COVERAGE_

B R I M B A N K ’ S TREE 2046 BRIMBANK INCREASE TREE PLANTING CANOPY COVER TO 30% INCREASE PERMEABILITY

TO 50%

POPULATION O N

PUBLIC LAND IS APPROXIMATELY

200,000 TREES

- BRIMBANK CITY COUNCIL, URBAN FOREST STRATEGY 2016-2046 734

30% CANOPY

COVER INCREASE

=

A N O T H E R 700,000 TREES


C A I R N L E A

AMOUNT OF TREES

PRECINCT

PRECINCT IS

71.15 HECTARES

GROSS AREA

PLANTED

IN

3467 735


SUSTAINABILITY | TREE CANOPY COVERAGE_

B R I M B A N K 1 2 , 3 3 8 H E C T A R E S

GROSS AREA 736

AMOUNT OF TREES

PLANTED IN

B R I M B A N K

CURRENTLY IS 200,000


737


SUSTAINABILITY | TREE CANOPY COVERAGE_

P R OPOSE D HECTARE TO TREE RATI O ON PU B L IC L AND IS 4 9 TREES PER HEC TARE

EXISTING HECTARE TO TREE RATIO IN BRIMBANK ON PUBLIC L AND IS 16 TREES PER HECTAR E 738


T HAT IS AN INCRE ASE I N OVER 300% OF TR E E S PER PER HEC TARE

739


BEFORE PRECINCT TREE PLANTING_

740


AFTER PRECINCT TREE PLANTING_

741


USER’S PERSPECTIVE_

742


743


ONE LAST NOTE | $5.3 BILLION TO BE PUT INTO SOCIAL HOUSING BY ANDREWS GOVERNMENT!_ PREMIER DANIEL ANDREWS KEY QUOTES:

BIG HOUSING BUILD KEY INITIATIVES:

“This will change lives – giving thousands of Victorians the security and stability of a home, and tens of thousands of Victorians a job.”

“$5.3 billion Big Housing Build to construct more than 12,000 new homes throughout metro and regional Victoria, as well as supporting around 10,000 jobs, per year over the next four years, to supercharge Victoria’s economic recovery through the pandemic and beyond.”

“It’s a profound investment in a stronger, fairer Victoria – a Victoria that recognises everyone deserves a place to call home.” - premier of victoria, 2020

- premier of victoria, 2020

“Of the new units, 1,000 will be for Indigenous Australians, 1,000 for victims of domestic violence and 2,000 for people with a mental illness” - ABC news, 2020

KEY LINKS:

•https://www.premier.vic.gov.au/victorias-big-housing-build •https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-11-15/victorian-governmentannounces-$5.3b-to-build-new-public-housing/12884962 •https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-11-15/victoria-to-build12000-homes-under-social-housing-program/12885144?nw=0

744


745


LIVEABLE PLACES_ AMY RODDA : LIVEABLE URBANITY_

GROUP 4 : LIVEABLE NEIGHBOURHOODS_

PARIS TRIANTIS : LIVEABLE ENVIRONMENTS_

UNIT: ARC70003/80002 DESIGN RESEARCH STUDIO B/C_STUDIO 6 : ZOOMBURBIA2.0! FUTURE HOMES & THE CITY OF SHORT DISTANCES - UNIT LEADER: DR IAN WOODCOCK

UNIT: ARC70003/80002 DESIGN RESEARCH STUDIO B/C_STUDIO 6 : ZOOMBURBIA2.0! FUTURE HOMES & THE CITY OF SHORT DISTANCES - UNIT LEADER: DR IAN WOODCOCK

20 MINUTE NEIGHBOURHOOD INDICATORS_

AMY RODDA | ARSEN SARKISIAN | MEGAN MURRAY | PARASKEVI TRIANTIS

ZONING AND IMPLEMENTATION IN CAIRNLEA

Unit: ARC70003/80002 Design Research Studio B/C_Studio 6 : Zoomburbia2.0! Future Homes & the City of Short Distances - Unit Leader: Dr Ian Woodcock

LiveAble Housing is a project that has manifested from an in depth analysis into Victoria’s shortfall in quality, affordable housing within 20-minute neighbourhoods. LiveAble Housing is something that should be a choice to not only those who meet the requirements but to anyone who wants to lead a liveable lifestyle within a 20 minute neighbourhood & 40 minute city. A lifestyle that is for the long-term, and is accessible, inclusive, & sustainable with a wide diversity of people, places, & amenities - all within walking distance. Thus, our goal is to have every 1 in 3 dwellings to be some sort of LiveAble Housing. Cairnlea Park LiveAble Development Strategy & Precinct Proposal is our strategic, statutory & spatial response to our LiveAble Housing design proposal, in which we have been investigating high amenity, affordable, medium density housing alternatives to enhance Melbourne’s 20-minute neighbourhood goals.

Public Transport | PPTN 400m Catchment

Primary School | 400m Catchment

Amenity | ACZ CZ MUZ & Activity Centres

Walkability | 70+ Score Rating & SNAMUTS

Open Space | PPRZ 400m Catchment

DEMOGRAPHIC IMPACT_

SELECTED LOTS = FHSC 643M2 +/- 10%_

62,097

23.27%

Number of Lots

20 Minute Neighbourhoods / Urban Growth Boundary

6.5

Dwellings/Lot

Redeveloped Lots Empty Lots

58,513 3,584

CAIRNLEA PARK LIVEABLE DEVELOPM

60,128

Replaced Dwellings

[Original Data Sourced from Aurin, 2020]

SUBURBS :

SELECTED LOTS :

EXISTING AMENITIES :

Cairnlea Deer Park

Fast Food x1

Mechanic x1

Community Hub x1

Retail & Fast Food x3

Petrol x1

Library x1

Kindergarten x1

Recreational Facility x1

Place of Worship x1

Primary School x2

Medical Centre x2

Vacant Lots - 19 Redeveloped Lots - 232 Untouched - 336 Existing Density | 12 dwgs / Ha Proposed Density | ~50 dwgs / Ha

343,503 / 3996 HA Total Net Dwelling Density in Ha [Rounded]

20 Minute Neighbourhoods

CURRENT ZONES :

1:3000 MASTERPLAN CAIRNLEA SOLOMON DRIVE PRECINCT WITHIN DEER PARK/CAIRNLEA 20 MINUTE NEIGHBOURHOOD CATCHMENT

C1Z

NRZ

GRZ PPRZ PUZ2

SITE PLAN 9AM_

SITE PLAN 12PM_

SITE PLAN 3PM_ 54

CURRENT DWELLING DENSITY_

MACRO SCALE INTERVENTION_

12 DWGS / HA

ARC80007 | Assessment 03_Planning Report

DEMOGRAPHIC IMPACT_ Based on ABS Average Household Sizes in Melbourne

Net

PROPOSED DWELLING DENSITY_

2.7

86 DWGS / HA Net

Average Household

>

5.7x 162,346

people

people within 20 minute neighbourhoods

EXISTING RESIDENTIAL ZONING_

VIEW FROM INTERIOR COURTYARD TO PUBLIC/PRIVATE TERRACE CIRCULATION

people within 20 minute neighbourhoods

PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL REZONING_ 1,466 HA

HA 471 HA 995 Residential Growth Zones

Mixed Use Zones

1:200 SOUTH ELEVATION SHOWING THE LANDSCAPING, PRIVACY, SCREENING AND PLANTING

927,457

Unchanged

6,405 HA

General Residential Zones

0

10m

0

10m

0

10m

14,162 HA

20,567 HA

Neighbourhood Residential Zones

Re-Zoned

EXTERNAL MATERIALITY_

INTERNAL MATERIALITY_

MODULAR DESIGN PREFAB APPLICATION ROOFING

VIEW OF THE LIVEABLE HOUSING BEING REPLICATED ACROSS ELIGIBLE LOTS WITHIN CAIRNLEA PRECINCT

WATERPROOFING SHIPLAP BIO SOLAR GREEN ROOF WATER RETENTION 400MM THICK SOIL LOW UHI

AUSTRAL MARINE AAA PLYWOOD

VODA SINK MIXER PULL OUT

PVC DOUBLE-GLAZED WINDOWS & DOORS

AFFINITY POLYFLOR PUR FINISH

HELIOSCREEN INTERNAL BLACKOUT

BOTTEGA CALIZA SLIP RESISTANT

VODA TWIN RAIL SHOWER

WATTYL I.D. ANTIQUE WHITE USA

AS/NZS 2272

ANTIMICROBIAL

TILT & TURN/STACKER

STRAIGHT LAID PLANK

HELIOGREEN CALAIS

CONCRETE LOOK

WITH OVERHEAD

19MM THICKNESS

BRUSHED COPPER

WHITE

CHAMPAGNE OAK 9785

SILVER LF & BO

1200X600MM TILE

BRUSHED COPPER

FLAT FINISH

2 POINT GBCA

2 POINT GBCA

WELS 5 STAR RATED

WERS STAR RATED

GREEN TAG CERT.

1 STAR GCBA

GREENRATE LEVEL A

WELS 3 STAR RATED

1 STAR GCBA

EAST-WEST SECTION SOUTH FACING

746

AUSTRAL MARINE AAA PLYWOOD

AS/NZS 2272 19MM THICKNESS

EAST-WEST SECTION SOUTH FACING

NORTH-SOUTH SECTION WEST FACING

FULL / SEMI GLOSS /

1:200 WEST ELEVATIO


SNAPSHOTS OF LIFE COMMUNITY GARDEN GARDENING WORKSHOPS ON A WEDNESDAY MORNING

ARSEN SARKISIAN : LIVEABLE MOVEMENT_

MEGAN MURRAY : LIVEABLE HOUSING_

AMENITIES

MODULARITY

UNIT: ARC70003/80002 DESIGN RESEARCH STUDIO B/C_STUDIO 6 : ZOOMBURBIA2.0! FUTURE HOMES & THE CITY OF SHORT DISTANCES - UNIT LEADER: DR IAN WOODCOCK

UNIT: ARC70003/80002 DESIGN RESEARCH STUDIO B/C_STUDIO 6 : ZOOMBURBIA2.0! FUTURE HOMES & THE CITY OF SHORT DISTANCES - UNIT LEADER: DR IAN WOODCOCK

MODULAR CONSTRUCTION

ROAD TYPOLOGIES

SUNDAY FRESH FOOD AND GOODS MARKET. FOOD EXCHANGE, BOOK EXCHANGE AND CLOTHES EXCHANGE.

TRANSPORT INFRASTRUCTURE SECTIONS

REPLICABILITY

MODULAR TRANSPORTATION

AMENITIES IN PROPOSAL

SINGLE TYPICAL SUBURBAN LOT 7 DWELLINGS

3 TYPICAL SUBURBAN LOTS SIDE-BY-SIDE 21 DWELLINGS

2 TYPICAL SUBURBAN LOTS SIDE-BY-SIDE 14 DWELLINGS

4 TYPICAL SUBURBAN LOTS SIDE-BY-SIDE/ BACK-TO-BACK 28 DWELLINGS

FLOOR PLANS

ONE WAY ROAD

CAIRNLEA PARK LIVEABLE DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY PRECINCT

PINEWOOD CRES

MENT STRATEGY PRECINCT

CAFE

[Original Data Sourced from Aurin, 2020]

CURRENT ZONES : C1Z

54

NRZ

C1Z

GRZ

MUZ

PPRZ

PPRZ

PUZ2

PUZ2

RGZ

A TYPICAL WEEKEND ALONG THE CAR FREE ADJACENT ZONES TO THE LIVEABLE HOUSING COMPLEX. OUTDOOR ACTIVITIES FOR FAMILIES.

ARC80007 | Assessment 03_Planning Report

Amy Rodda_102520063 | Arsen Sarkisian_102757023 | Paraskevi Triantis_7686293

CHILDCARE

BUS STOP SHELTER DESIGN INTERVENTION

PROPOSED ZONES :

SOLAR PANELS

55

GREENERY PEDESTRIAN AND BIKE PATH

BOX GUTTER

BIKE STORAGE

GROUND FLOOR PLAN I SCALE 1:200

[Original Data Sourced from Aurin, 2020]

2.

PROPOSED ZONES : C1Z

RGZ

BLACKWOOD CT

MUZ PPRZ PUZ2

Amy Rodda_102520063 | Arsen Sarkisian_102757023 | Paraskevi Triantis_7686293

COMMUNAL LIBRARY / FOOD PROGRAM

+

2.

+

2.

+

2.

=

2 X COMMUNITY SPACE 8 X DWELLINGS

PERMEABLE CONCRETE

55

RESIDENTS SIT IN THEIR PRIVATE COURTYARD ON THE GROUND FLOOR. SUN GENTLY EASES INTO THE SPACE, PROVIDING WARMTH.

2.

+

SHELTER

BIKE RACK

GREENERY PEDESTRIAN FOOTPATH AND BIKE PATHS

STATION ROAD

ON FRONT FACADE SHOWING TRELLIS AND ROOFTOP PLANTING

STATION ROAD A TYPICAL WEEKDAY AT THE GROUND FLOOR LOCAL CORNER CHILDCARE.

TYPICAL APARTMENT ENTRY

TYPICAL APARTMENT BEDROOM

FIRST FLOOR PLAN I SCALE 1:200 2.

NEW INTERCHANGE AT STATION ROAD

2.

+

TYPICAL APARTMENT LAYOUTS

BUS INTERCHANGE AT STATION ROAD

+

2.

+

2.

+

2.

=

2 X COMMUNITY SPACE 8 X DWELLINGS

NEW BUS STOP AND INTERVENTION

A COMMUNITY LED LITTLE BOOKTSTORE AND LITTLE KITCHEN. FOOD AND BOOKS PROVIDED BY THE PUBLIC AND RESIDENTS. INTENDED TO BE FREE TO THOSE IN NEED OF ASSISTANCE DUE TO HOUSEHOLD STRESS.

STUDIO APARTMENT I SCALE 1:100 GROSS FLOOR AREA: 39M2 INTERNAL FLOOR AREA: 29M2 GROSS FLOOR AREA: 10M2

1 BEDROOM APARTMENT I SCALE 1:100 GROSS FLOOR AREA: 48M2 INTERNAL FLOOR AREA: 40M2 GROSS FLOOR AREA: 8M2

2 BEDROOM APARTMENT I SCALE 1:100 GROSS FLOOR AREA: 96M2 INTERNAL FLOOR AREA: 82M2 GROSS FLOOR AREA: 14M2

SECOND FLOOR PLAN I SCALE 1:200 2.

4.

+

STUDIO APARTMENT I SCALE 1:100 GROSS FLOOR AREA: 39M2 INTERNAL FLOOR AREA: 29M2 GROSS FLOOR AREA: 10M2

1 BEDROOM APARTMENT I SCALE 1:100 GROSS FLOOR AREA: 48M2 INTERNAL FLOOR AREA: 40M2 GROSS FLOOR AREA: 8M2

+

4.

+

2.

=

2 X COMMUNITY SPACE 10 X DWELLINGS

2 BEDROOM APARTMENT I SCALE 1:100 GROSS FLOOR AREA: 96M2 INTERNAL FLOOR AREA: 82M2 GROSS FLOOR AREA: 14M2 ROOFTOP GARDEN FLOOR PLAN I SCALE 1:200

NORTH ELEVATION I SCALE 1:200

SECTION AA I SCALE 1:200

747


REFERENCES N-Z_ • National Construction Code, 2019, ‘Section D Access and egress’, NCC 2019

Volume One Amendment 1, [online], Available: https://ncc.abcb.gov.au/ncc-online/ NCC/2019-A1/NCC-2019-Volume-One-Amendment-1/Section-D-Access-andEgress/Section-D-Access-And-Egress-sub-item-28 • National Disability Insurance Agency, 2018, What is the NDIS Responsible for?, NDIS, [online], Available: https://www.ndis.gov.au/understanding/what-ndisresponsible • NCBDDD, 2020, Common Barriers to Participation Experienced by People with

Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, [online], Available: https:// www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/disabilityandhealth/disability-barriers.html • NDSS, 2020, Diabetes Map, Australian Government, [online], Available: https:// map.ndss.com.au/#!/ • Newton, P., 2010, Beyond Greenfield and Brownfield: The Challenge of

Regenerating Australia’s Greyfield Suburbs, Vol. 36., Built Environment, Alexandrine Press, [online], Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/23289985?seq=1 • Office of the Victorian Government Architect, 2020, The case for good design:

Housing, Victoria State Government, [online], Available: https://www.ovga.vic.gov. au/case-good-design-housing-guide-government

xi

• Parker, P., 2019, Timetable Tuesday #18: Route 420 - the L of the west, Melbourne on Transit, [online], Available: https://melbourneontransit.blogspot. com/2019/04/timetable-tuesday-18-route-420-l-of-west.html#:~:text=420%20 is%20less%20frequent%20on,also%20run%20every%2020%20minutes. • PD&R Edge Home, 2020, Vienna’s Unique Social Housing Program, HUD User, [online], Available: https://www.huduser.gov/portal/pdredge/pdr_edge_featd_ article_011314.html • People with Disability Australia, 2018, 2019 Federal Budget, [online], Available: https://pwd.org.au/2019-federal-budget/ • Pfeifer, Z., 2017, Du Meine Konkete Utopie, Zara Pfeifer, [online], Available: http://www.zarapfeifer.com/du-meine-konkrete-utopie • Polyflor, 2020, Affinity, [online], Available: https://www.polyflor.com.au/ amfilerating/file/download/file_id/916/ • Productivity Commission, 2020, Victoria’s Commercial Land Use Zoning,

Productivity Reform Case Study, Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra, [online], Available: https://www.pc.gov.au/research/completed/vic-commercial-zoning/viccommercial-zoning.pdf • PTV, 2020, Route 420, [online], Available: https://d309ul1fvo6zfp.cloudfront. net/1604268706326/bus-8710-2017-11-26-2020-12-31.pdf


• PTV, 2020, Route 423, [online], Available: https://d309ul1fvo6zfp.cloudfront.

• Rains, M., Butland, R., 2013, Lifting the Barriers: Planning for Increased

net/1604268706326/bus-11323-2018-07-16-2020-12-31.pdf

Mobility and Accessibility through the Adelaide CBD., School of Natural and Built Environments, The University of South Australia, [online], Available: https://apo.org.

• PTV, 2020, Route 942, [online], Available: https://d309ul1fvo6zfp.cloudfront.

au/sites/default/files/resource-files/2013-11/apo-nid59907.pdf

net/1604268706326/nightrider-11548-2020-10-16-2020-12-31.pdf • Ratio, 2018, GET THE BASICS RIGHT: THE ZONES AND THE PLANNING • Public Transport Division, 2008, Public Transport Guidelines for Land Use and

PROCESS, [online], Available: http://www.ratio.com.au/get-the-basics-right-the-

Development, Victoria State Government, [online], Available: https://transport.vic.

zones-and-the-planning-process

gov.au/about/planning/guidelines-for-land-use-development • Rebecca, 2015, Inclusive and Accessible Urban Spaces, id consulting, [online], • PVC Windows, 2020, Double Glazed Windows Supplier Australia, [online],

Available: https://blog.id.com.au/2015/id-news/fun-stuff/urban-spaces-for-

Available: https://pvcwindows.com.au/upvc-double-glazed-windows/

people-with-disability/

• QGIS, 2020, QGIS Geographic Information System, Open Source Geospatial

• Rebernik, N., Szajczyk, M., Bahillo, A., Marusic, B. G., 2020, Measuring Disability

Foundation Project, Available: http://qgis.osgeo.org/

Inclusion Performance in Cities Using Disability Inclusion Evaluation Tool (DIETool), Sustainability, [online], Available: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/4/1378/

• Rafiemanzelat, R., Emadi, M. I., Kamali, A. J., 2017, City sustainability: the

pdf

influence of walkability on built environments, Vol. 24, Transportation Research Procedia, [online], Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/

• Rex, la roche di rex, urban edge ceramics, [online], Available: https://www.

S2352146517303551

urbanedgeceramics.com.au/images/pdfs/laroche.pdf

• Ramage, C., 2020, Australian Walking and Cycling Conference 2020, cited

• Richardson, K., Merner, B., 2013, An Introduction to Victoria’s Planning System,

in tweet by @GillKing01, [online], Available: https://twitter.com/GillKing01/

Parliament of Victoria, [online], Available: https://www.parliament.vic.gov.au/

status/1311856765135323136?s=20

publications/research-papers/download/36-research-papers/13746-planning#_ ftn96

xii


• Senate Standing Committees on Community Affairs, 2017, Delivery of outcomes

• Sirr, R., 2019, SUBMISSION FROM PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES ACT (PWDACT)

under the National Disability Strategy 2010-2020 to build inclusive and accessible

AS PART OF THE ACT PRE-BUDGET CONSULTATION 2020-21, People

communities: Chapter 3 – Key Concerns and Ongoing Accessibility Issues,

with Disabilities ACT, [online], Available: https://pwdact.org.au/wp-content/

Parliament of Australia, [online], Available: https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_

uploads/2019/11/PWDACT-2020-21-Budget-Submission.pdf

Business/Committees/Senate/Community_Affairs/AccessibleCommunities/Report • Studco, 2020, Systems, [online], Available: https://www.studcosystems.com.au/ • Shield, M., 2020, Greens to introduce new bill that would set public housing

products/walls

targets in Victoria, The Greens Victoria, [online], Available: https://greens.org.au/ vic/news/greens-introduce-new-bill-would-set-public-housing-targets-victoria?fbcl

• Sustainable Construction Services, 2013, uPVC Entrance Doors, [online],

id=IwAR3CQtDB5yCinpSBB9wmuyfLNSXJXHsZA7MSJWnblzFVUs9hDBxXByljfMo

Available: http://www.sustainableconstructionservices.com.au/products/frontdoors-entrance-doors/upvc-entrance-doors

• Scheurer, J., 2020, pers. comm. • Taylor, G., 2016, ‘Can people own land in the ACT?’ Curious Canberra, ABC • Shorten, W. R., 2013, Building Code 2013, Federal Register of Legislation, [online],

NEWS, [online], Available: https://www.abc.net.au/news/specials/curious-

Available: https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/F2013L00130

canberra/2016-07-04/can-people-own-land-in-the-act/7550166?fbclid=IwAR06H M0U4wyCdv-hkg7c5Zu8gFvMaKs2qzrdWOs_cuVjmkYgKGyywbGQfss

• Sinclair, P., Creek, A., Marshall, T., 2005, The Former Albion Explosives Factory:

Cordite and TNT To Suburban Dream, Semantic Scholar, [online], Available:

• Thorpe, D., 2018, Why city halls should look to Vienna, not big developers, to

https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/The-Former-Albion-Explosives-

solve their affordable housing crises, The Fifth State, [online], Available: https://

Factory%3ACordite-And-To-Sinclair-Creek/4329061fff794a34a5cb78b4cc1d230fe

www.thefifthestate.com.au/innovation/residential-2/why-city-halls-should-look-to-

95d44cf

vienna-not-big-developers-to-solve-their-affordable-housing-crises/

• Trudgeon, M., 2020, pers. comm.

xiii


• United Nations, 2016, Disability, Accessibility and Sustainable Urban

• Whitzman, C., Giles-Corti, B., Lowe, M., Badland, H., Davern, M., Hes, D., Aye, L.,

Development, [online], Available: https://www.un.org/disabilities/documents/

Butterworth, I., 2012, Liveability Indicators: which will be most useful for integrated

Disability_and_Urban_development.pdf

planning in the NWMR?, University of Melbourne, [online], Available: https:// socialequity.unimelb.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0006/1979574/Liveability-

• United Nations, 2016, Good Practices of Accessible Urban Development,

Indicators-report.pdf

Department of Economics and Social Affairs: Social Inclusion, [online], Available: https://www.un.org/development/desa/dspd/2016/10/good-practices-of-

• Wikipedia, 2020, Alexandra Road Estate, [online], Available: https://en.wikipedia.

accessibleurban-development/

org/wiki/Alexandra_Road_Estate

• Urban Design Protocol, 2015, Creating Places for People: An Urban Design

• Winstanley, T., 2019, AD Classics: Trellick Tower / Erno Goldfinger, ArchDaily,

Protocol for Australian Cities, [online], Available: https://urbandesign.org.au/

[online], Available: https://www.archdaily.com/151227/ad-classics-trellick-tower-

protocol-framework/principles/walkable/

erno-goldfinger/50380e3428ba0d599b000ba0-ad-classics-trellick-tower-ernogoldfinger-plan-below-public-access

• Victorian Health and Human Services, Building Authority, 2020, Universal Design, Victoria State Government, [online], Available: https://www.vhhsba.vic.gov.au/

• Woodcock, I., 2020, pers. comm.

resources/universal-design • YourHome, 2020, Austalian Government, [online], Available: https://www. • VPA, 2017, Metropolitan Open Space Network: Provision and Distribution,

yourhome.gov.au/

Victoria State Government, [online], Available: https://vpa.vic.gov.au/wp-content/ uploads/2018/02/Open-Space-Network-Provision-and-Distribution-Reduced-Size. pdf?fbclid=IwAR3Yp6ZeCHHskGGsstrKyMGhlRZ9Y8pIq9E5FSZ0DepuAEfowxdu9v1FbqQ

xiv



Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.