LIVEABLE PLACES: PART 2_
DESIGN RESEARCH STUDIO C_ZOOMBURBIA 2.0 | SEMESTER 2, 2020 | SWINBURNE UNIVERSITY Amy Rodda | Master of Architecture & Urban Design - Unit Convenor: Ian Woodcock
ABSTRACT_ *Due to the scope of work undertaken in this studio this is PART 2 of my folio. This semester our Design Research Studio look at critically responding to Victoria’s Plan Melbourne’s 20-Minute Neighbourhoods Principal Strategy, and seeking what this this response would look like strategically, statutorally and spatially. As part of this studio I predominently worked as part of a group, known as Team 4, which was made up of Megan Murray, Arsen Sarkisian and Paris Triantis. Our project is called LiveAble Places and looks at a multi-scalar affordable housing approached to 20-Minute Neighbourhoods. I hope this folio gives you some insight as to what I did throughout Design Research Studio B / C Zoomburbia 2.0! & Team 4’s final proposal for both this studio and the Future Homes Student Competition. I have structured my folio sequentially so that you can get an understanding of what I learnt from this studio & the Liveability of Melbourne as a series of 20-Minute neighbourhoods. So, although the best way to understand this project is to have been part of it & experienced this studio for yourself [especially considering this studio took place remotely during the Covid-19 Pandemic Lockdown], I hope that by flicking through these pages you are able to get a sense of the problems & solutions; questions, processes & outcomes; & concepts, explorations & reflections that came out of Swinburne’s 2020 Zoomburbia 2.0! studio.
LIVEABLE PLACES_
DESIGN RESEARCH STUDIO C_ZOOMBURBIA 2.0 | SEMESTER 2, 2020 | SWINBURNE UNIVERSITY Amy Rodda | Master of Architecture & Urban Design - Unit Convenor: Ian Woodcock
07
SCHEMATIC DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
08
MID SEMESTER PRESENTATION
09
PROJECT DEFINITION
MID-SEMESTER PREPARATIONS Abstract / 330-331 QGIS Analysis / 332-339 Proposed City Typology / 340-341 Micro-urban Response / 342-349 Proposal Planning / 350-355
TEAM 4 | HABITATIO
Abstract / 356-357 Contextual Reasoning / 358-369 Topical Studies / 370-399 Scenario A / 402-411 Scenario B / 412-423 Scenario C / 424-497 Other Factors / 498-521 Next Steps / 522-523
ADDRESSING FEEDBACK
Abstract / 524-525 Feedback / 526-527 Brimbank Reasoning / 528-531 Business Model Investigation - Next Steps / 532-533
10
SUSTAINABLE MOBILITY ENVIRONMENTS
11
SCALAR THINKING
12
ARCHITECTURE IN CONTEXT
MOBILITIES DESIGN PRECEDENTS Abstract / 534-535 Precedents / 536-543
MACRO-MESO-MICRO APPROACHES Abstract / 544-545 Road Map / 546-547 Thought Process / 548-549 Scalar Thinking / 550-551
FHSC-TYPE LOT AMALGAMATIONS
Abstract / 552-553 Micro-scale Approach - Testing / 554-555 Architectural Massing Studies / 556-557 Site Amalgamation Studies / 558-559 Ground Floor Dwelling + Site Amalgamation Studies / 560-561 Social HousingTypologies Internal Circulation Moodboard / 562-563
13
SPACE, FORM & USE AT MULTIPLE SCALES
14
PLANNING LAW, STRATEGIC & STATUTORY PLANNING
15
FUTURE HOMES STUDENT COMPETITION
PROGRAM & NARRATIVE PLANNING
Abstract / 564-565 Strategy - Elements / 566-567 Barrier/Connections - Survey Responses / 568-569 Amenity Possibilities - SNAMUTS Findings / 570-571 Micro Scale Approaches / 572-573
FINALISING MESO-MICRO SCALE PROPOSALS Abstract / 574-575 Zoning & Overlay Observations_Steps / 576-583 Deer Park / 584-597
COMPETITION ENTRY
Abstract / 598-599 Entry Brief Response / 600-601 Materiality_Fixtures_Fittings / 602-607 Strategic Urban Planning Intervention / 608-609 Contextual Site Plans / 610-611 Floor Plans / 612-613 Rendered Roof Plan_Snapshots of Life / 614-615 Sections & Elevations / 616-618 Typical Apartment Layouts / 619-621 Internal Apartment Renders / 622-623
16
FINAL PRESENTATION
17
REFERENCES
LIVEABLE PLACES
Abstract / 624-625 LiveAble Urbanity / 626-639 Urban Planning Strategy / 640-647 LiveAble Housing / 648-689 LiveAble Sustainability / 690-693 LiveAble Places Pilot Intervention_Stakeholder Engagement / 694-717 LiveAble Movement / 718-733 LiveAble Environments / 734-743 Feasability Potentials / 744-745 LiveAble Place / 746-747
EXTERNAL CITATIONS References / 748-759
330
SCHEMATIC DESIGN DEVELOPMENT_ Once our project’s framework for mid-semester had been identified, our group [Team 4: Megan Murray, Arsen Sarkisian, Paris Triantis, Amy Rodda] zoomed into the meso scale in order to look at intervention opportunities that could come out of this studio. This was completed through a combination of digital spatial tools such as QGIS and Rhino, and through sketches and group workshops completed via zoom. This Schematic Design Development manifested into our Proposal Narrative that we used for our Mid Semester Presentation.
331
MELBOURNE | UNEMPLOYMENT RATES_
11.321 - 19.696 8.092 - 11.321 5.849 - 8.092 0.5 - 5.849
0 - 0.1
332
333
BRIMBANK | OPEN SPACE & CARPARKS_
Open Space
Carparks
334
335
BRIMBANK | FAST FOOD AMENITIES_
PPTN
Fast Food Amenities FHSC Lots
336
337
BRIMBANK | PROPOSED URBAN INTERVENTION IDEA_ connecting open space & repurposed carparks to create a new flow/walkability around & within Brimbank
Brimbank
Connectivity Intervention Carparks
Open Spaces
338
339
PROPOSED CITY TYPOLOGY_ In addition to looking into the societal city typologies explored with Bridgette, we have been look at different urban city typologies. 20 minuteness, aligns closest [out of the options to the right] with that of a hybrid of a compact city & a corridor city. We are aiming for most likely something like a Garden City, where you have all the amenity within multiple 20 minute neighbourhoods, and where the neighbourhoods themselves are fairly liveable, meaning that people won’t need to travel far for daily activities.
340
HYBRID
341
MICRO URBAN RESPONSE | ST ALBANS_
342
343
MICRO URBAN RESPONSE | ST ALBANS_
344
345
MICRO URBAN RESPONSE | ST ALBANS_
346
347
MICRO URBAN RESPONSE | ST ALBANS_
348
349
VICTORIA’S SOCIAL HOUSING PROBLEM_ 1,700 more social housing homes are needed EACH YEAR over the next 20 years ... in Victoria. - Victoria State Government
[ABS]
[OECD, 2019]
3.5%
15%
of housing stock in Victoria is social housing.
350
of Berlin’s housing stock was social housing in 2016.
[Lincoln Institute for Land & Policy, 2019]
[New Statesman, 2019]
of housing stock in Hong Kong is social housing.
of housing stock in Vienna is government owned social housing.
29%
60%
351
OUR PROPOSAL_
352
353
OUR PROPOSAL_
354
355
356
MID SEMESTER PRESENTATION_ For our Mid Semester Presentation Team 4 looked showcased the Social Housing stock issue that Melbourne is currently facing, and three potential future scenarios that could eventuate. Using the case study Municipalities of Brimbank, Dandenong and Hume, we also looked at whether social housing should be looked at on a locality by locality basis or should be looked at from a whole city approach. We found that Melbourne is not meeting is required 7% social housing goals, and looked at the potential opportunities that could eventuate from allowing this 7% to come to fruition. From our presentation, we were able to gauge that we had stumbled upon a topic that has a lot of interest, and the panel that we presented to encouraged us to continue down this thought process, and look at what having a lot larger percentage of social housing within Melbourne would look like.
357
WHAT A 20 MINUTE CITY MEANS TO US_ A 20-MINUTE NEIGHBOURHOOD means that an individual from any SOCIO-ECONOMIC BACKGROUND, AGE, or SOCIO-CULTURAL DEMOGRAPHIC can access all of the AMENITIES THEY NEED to COMFORTABLY live their lives and support their families within a 20-MINUTE ROUND TRIP of their home via WALKING, CYCLING or PUBLIC TRANSPORT. These amenities could include but are not limited to schools and education institutions , grocery, outdoor recreation spaces and places of worship.
358
359
URBAN GROWTH AREAS | URBAN EXTENT_
1883 1927 1954 1971 2001 2015 Growth Area Boundary Green Wedge
360
361
CONTEXT | COMPARISON ON A GLOBAL SCALE_
3.5%
VICTORIA Social Housing
362
15%
29%
60%
BERLIN
HONG KONG
VIENNA
Social Housing
Social Housing
Social Housing
363
Space For people
new inSTruMenTS oF MobiliTy ManageMenT
PRECEDENTS | LEARNING FROM OTHERS_
PRECEDENTS | LEARNING FROM OTHERS
PARIS
PARIS
circumstances. The central target of Vienna’s mobility policy is “80:20” – by 2025, Vienna’s residents will make 80% of their jour neys by public transport, by bike or on foot (2012: 73%) and only 20% by car (2012: 27%). In order to achieve this, Vienna is active ly promoting ecofriendly means of transport. optimisation and upgrade of public transport: expansion of the public transport system and improvement of public transport offerings through the construction of new metro lines, the extension of existing lines and measures to make the commuter railway network and tangential tram and bus connections more attractive. integration and networking of eco-friendly means of transport: Vienna is creating better options for combining eco-friendly means of transport (public transport, cycling, walking). walking and cycling – strong partners for eco-friendly urban transport: Vienna is creating a dense and attractive network of walking and cycling paths for the “city of short distances”. From street space to public space: Vienna is gradually renovating public space and thus improving its quality as a place where people want to spend time and creating more space for diverse uses. Mobility management for residential quarters and company locations: Vienna is relying on new instruments for tailored mobility concepts – including for large-scale residential, office and retail projects – that allow for short distances that can be travelled with environmentally friendly modes of transport.
VIENNA
Vienna iS MoVing VIENNA
100 364
HELSINKI HELSINKI
PARIS
VIENNA
HELSINKI
365
PRECEDENTS| |CATCHMENT CATCHMENT OF AMENITIES_ PRECEDENTS OF AMENITIES
10 Minute Catchment (800m)
PARIS PARIS
VIENNA VIENNA
Mobility
All Transport
Pedestrian Paths
Bike Paths
Amenity
Transport Stations
Health Services
Education
366
20 Minute Catchment (1600m)
Both Catchments
HELSINKI HELSINKI
Religion
Green / Open Space
Housing
PRECEDENTS | KEY FINDINGS_
PRECEDENTS | KEY FINDINGS Les agences d’urbanisme Une ingénierie en réseau pour les politiques territoriales
Mai 2012
Key characteristics from precedents • Walkable and rideable cities that allow for permeability through mobility of the site and zones throughout the city. • Pedestrian and cyclist movement as the primary mobility alongside supporting public transport with high frequency of use to allow for adaptable and quick transit. • Reduce inequality. • Functional Cities, people orientated cities. • Compact Cities with mixed approaches. • Housing infrastructure that allows for diversity. • Further increase pf amenities that allow education, health services. Overall supporting the inhabitants. • Green networks and open space to break spatial barriers of the compact city and create areas of tourism such as national parks.
The Most Functional City in the World Helsinki City Strategy 2017–2021
1 The Most Functional City in the World
Helsinki City Strategy 2017–2021
367
OUR RESEARCH QUESTION_ How might we develop a planning & design solution that ensures that all of MELBOURNE’S SOCIAL HOUSING celebrates mixed-use amenity & is accessible within 20 MINUTE NEIGHBOURHOODS, and provides ATTRACTIVE, ADAPTABLE, AFFORDABLE, ACCESSIBLE and SUSTAINABLE housing for diverse GROUPS and INDIVIDUALS within varied socio-
economic brackets, whilst encouraging ACTIVE AND SOCIAL LIFESTYLES?
368
HUME_
DANDENONG_
BRIMBANK_
SELECTED LGAS | NEIGHBOURHOOD CHARACTER_
369
WHY IS SOCIAL HOUSING SO IMPORTANT_
7.98% BRIMBANK
JUNE
VICTORIA 9.9% DANDENONG
7.95% HUME 370
25.83%
>
2020
45,698
People waiting for Social Housing
SOCIAL HOUSING STOCK = 3.5%
7%
2016
2036
371
1
2016 :
2.83
SOCIAL HOUSE Greater Melbourne
Households
167,580
Elligible Households
82,266
Regional Victoria
29.3%
Regional Victoria
59,008
Greater Melbourne
70.7%
Greater Melbourne
372
2036 :
1
14.66%
INCREASE Demand
3.24
SOCIAL HOUSE Greater Melbourne
Households
243,222
Regional Victoria
Greater Melbourne
192,145
Greater Melbourne
21%
8.3%
INCREASE
79%
Greater Melbourne
373
WHY IS MELBOURNE NOT A 20-MINUTE CITY?
Outer Ring
Percentage of Residents that don’t have walkable access to public transport (Infrastructure Australia, 2018)
1.5 M
Middle Ring
1.2 M
0.9 M
26.5 Adelaide
Inner Ring
0.6 M
0.3 M
ur
ne
e id
bo
el
el a
M
ur
ne
Ad
e id
bo
M
el
el a
ne
Ad
ur bo
el
M
Ad
el a
id
e
0.0 M
* walkable access to public transport is defined by Infrastructure Australia as being within 800m heavy rail & 400m of all other modes within the PPTN.
374
40.4 Melbourne
THE CHALLENGE OF ADAPTING TO 20-MINUTE NEIGBOURHOODS_ Average commute to work (km) in Australia’s Capital Cities
BRISBANE MELBOURNE SYDNEY PERTH CANBERRA HOBART ADELAIDE DARWIN 5 KM
10 KM
15 KM
20 KM
375
HOW OUR SOCIAL HOUSING STACKS UP | & TOTAL HOUSING STOCK BY LGA_ BRIMBANK SUBURBS_ Albanvale
Delahey
Keilor Lodge
Sunshine West
Albion
Derrimut
Keilor North
Sydenham
Ardeer
Hillside
Keilor Park
Taylors Lakes
Brooklyn
Kealba
Kings Park
Tullamarine
Cairnlea
Keilor
St Albans
Calder Park
Keilor Downs
Sunshine
Deer Park
Keilor East
Sunshine North
Attwood
Dallas
Kalkallo
Somerton
Broadmeadows
Diggers Rest
Keilor
Sunbury
Bulla
Hillside
Keilor North
Tullamarine
Campbellfield
Fawkner
Meadow Heights
Westmeadows
Clarkefield
Gladstone Park
Melbourne Airport
Wildwools
Coolaroo
Greenvale
Oaklands Junction
Yuroke
Craigieburn
Jacana
Roxburgh Park
HUME SUBURBS_
376
YARRA
N
Springvale South
15%
Dandenong North
PORT PHILLIP
Dandenong South Keysborough Noble Park Noble Park North
V
M
MARIBYRNONG TOTAL % OF SOCIAL HOUSING VICTORIA NEEDS TO MITIGATE OUR CURRENT SOCIAL HOUSING CRISIS
7% DAREBIN
MELBOURNE CITY S
M
BANYULE GREATER DANDENONG, HOBSONS BAY
TOTAL % SOCIAL HOUSING STOCK (AUSTRALIA)
4.2%
BELOW REQUIRED
Dandenong
TOTAL % OF SOCIAL HOUSING STOCK IN BERLIN
STONNINGTON
FRANKSTON MORELAND BAYSIDE P
TOTAL % SOCIAL HOUSING STOCK (MELBOURNE)
M
3.65%
POOR
Springvale
M
BRIMBANK, MAROONDAH
MONASH HUME WHITEHORSE MORNINGTON
M
CASEY KNOX WHITTLESEA, YARRA RANGES CARDINIA, GLEN EIRA, MELTON, WYNDHAM BOORANDARA MANNINGHAM NILUMBIK
VERY POOR
Bangholme
O
OUTPERFORMING REQUIRED
DANDENONG SUBURBS_
WORLD CLASS
MOONEE VALLEY
377
HOW OUR SOCIAL HOUSING STACKS UP | PRECEDENTS_
BOORANDARA : 1.4% SOCIAL HOUSING STOCK
378
YARRA : 15.6% SOCIAL HOUSING STOCK
In 2014 a block of three-storey social housing dwellings in Elizabeth Street, RICHMOND (left) were replaced with 207 SOCIAL HOUSING UNITS across four towers. (Williams Boag, 2020)
379
DIABETES PREVALENCE | REGISTRANT PERCENTAGE_ 7.31%
15,940
BRIMBANK
7.08%
12,080
1.5 - 2.5% 2.5 - 3.5%
DANDENONG
3.5 - 4.5% 4.5 - 5.5% 5.5 - 6.67% Urban Extent 2015 Study LGAs
6.83%
15,120
HUME 380
381
DIABETES PREVALENCE | TYPE 1 PERCENTAGE_ 5.14% 820
BRIMBANK
5.22% 630
5 - 7% 7 - 8.5%
DANDENONG
8.5 - 9.5% 9.5 - 12% 12 - 16.1% Urban Extent 2015 Study LGAs
6.42% 970
HUME 382
383
DIABETES PREVALENCE | TYPE 2 PERCENTAGE_ 91.28% 14,550
BRIMBANK
90.07% 10,880
70 - 85% 85 - 86%
DANDENONG
86 - 87% 87 - 88% 88 - 95% Urban Extent 2015 Study LGAs
88.89% 13,440
HUME 384
385
DIABETES PREVALENCE | TYPE 2 PERCENTAGE_ 6.67%
14,550
BRIMBANK
6.38%
10,880
1.5 - 2.5% 2.5 - 3.5%
DANDENONG
3.5 - 4.5% 4.5 - 5.5% 5.5 - 6.67% Urban Extent 2015 Study LGAs
6.07%
13,440
HUME 386
387
ACCESSIBILITY | NON-WORK SCORE_ An individual’s ability to reach non-work destinations, often as part of their daily routine. These destinations include grocery stores, schools, restaurants, parks, pharmacies and other common destinations. Overall, non-work trips make up almost 85% of all household travel [Citilabs, 2017]. 0-10 10-20 20-30 30-40 40-50 50-60 60-70 70-80 80-90 90-100 Urban Extent 2015 Study LGAs
388
389
ACCESSIBILITY | WALKSCORE_
MODE OF TRANSPORT TO WORK (ABS, 2016)
BRIMBANK OTHER
CYCLING
WALKING
PUBLIC TRANSPORT
PRIVATE VEHICLE
50
WALKSCORES 34-71 / 100
RANKINGS 76-300 / 346
MODE OF TRANSPORT TO WORK (ABS, 2016)
DANDENONG OTHER
CYCLING
WALKING
PUBLIC TRANSPORT
PRIVATE VEHICLE
43
WALKSCORES 18-66 / 100
RANKINGS
56
108-329 / 346
Walkscore [Average]
MODE OF TRANSPORT TO WORK (ABS, 2016)
Urban Extent 2015
HUME
Study LGAs
3
OTHER
97
CYCLING
WALKING
PUBLIC TRANSPORT
PRIVATE VEHICLE
48
WALKSCORES 35-64 / 100
RANKINGS 121-297 / 346
390
48 50
97
43
391
2016 - 2036 | POPULATION_ 2016 :
BRIMBANK
194,319
25.68%
2036 :
244,500
1.29% P.A. 2016 :
DANDENONG
152,050
43.74%
2036 :
218,560
2.19% P.A. 2016 :
HUME
197,376
74.28%
3.71% P.A. 392
2036 :
343,990
2016 :
2036 :
393
2016 - 2036 | DWELLING_ 2016 :
2036 : 23.42%
BRIMBANK
58,570
1.17% P.A.
2016 :
73,911 2036 :
31.38%
DANDENONG
60,375
1.57% P.A.
2016 :
82,445 2036 :
69.49%
HUME
81,928 394
3.47% P.A.
162,077
2016 :
2036 :
395
2016 : BRIMBANK
87.15%
public housing
1,797
87.58%
DANDENONG
public housing
2,355
87.57%
HUME 396
public housing
2,121
12.85%
3.52%
community housing
social housing
12.42%
4.45%
community housing
social housing
12.43%
2.96%
community housing
social housing
265
334
301
2,062
2,689
2,422
> > >
dwellings
58,570
dwellings
60,375
dwellings
81,928
397
SCENARIO TESTING _
398
ACTIVITY CENTRE_ Introduced through the melbourne 2030 strategy. intrinsically a part of melbourne’s growth and development. DEFINED AS PLACES FOR “...HOUSING, RETAIL, COMMERCIAL AND CIVIC SERVICES...” WITH A KEY FOCUS ON “... COMMUNITY SERVICES, EMPLOYMENT AND SOCIAL INTERACTION.” (brimbank activity centre strategy, 2018). Activity
Centres today prioritise high-density development and have ample connections to public transport. Both private and public sectors can invest in activity centres. Activity Centres are broken down into specific categories, as defined by the plan melbourne activity centre hierarchy : METROPOLITAN ACTIVITY CENTRE, MAJOR ACTIVITY CENTRES, NEIGHBOURHOOD ACTIVITY CENTRES, & LOCAL ACTIVITY CENTRES.
399
SCENARIO TESTING_
Social housing stock of 3.6% IN MELBOURNE 2036 will mean that ONLY 4 LOCAL GOVERNMENT AREAS will be providing adequate social housing. In 2036 these suburbs will only represent 8.7% OF MELBOURNE’S TOTAL POPULATION.
Central City Metropolitan Activity Centres Major Activity Centres PPTN 400m Catchment Urban Extent 2015
400
For all suburbs to supply adequate social housing, Greater Melbourne will need to TRIPLE SOCIAL HOUSING STOCK BY 2036.
401
SCENARIO TESTING _ DOES MELBOURNE’S CURRENT SOCIAL HOUSING APPROACH FIT WITHIN 20-MINUTE CITIES? Meeting Melbourne’s demand for social housing within existing 20-minute neighbourhoods.
402
SCENARIO A: THE VILLAGE_
BROAD DEFINITION:
+
“State intervention proves ineffective or unsustainable, but local communities attempt to fill the void”. SCENARIO SPECIFIC DEFINITION:
Currently in Melbourne a community housing groups, do a large proportion of the heavy lifting in supplying and maintain the cities social housing.
403
SCENARIO A I SOCIAL HOUSING BASED ON LGA PERCENTAGE_
3.52%
social housing
4.45%
social housing
2.96%
social housing 404
BRIMBANK
DANDENONG
HUME
existing
2,062
new
540
3.52%
social housing
2,602 4.45%
existing
2,689
new
983
social housing
3,672
2.96%
existing
2,422
new
2,369
social housing
4,791
405
SCENARIO A I SOCIAL HOUSING BASED ON LGA AGGREGATE DISTRIBUTED EVENLY_
new social housing
27,668
406
new
893
>
BRIMBANK
existing
2,062
4%
social housing
2,955 4.34%
DANDENONG
existing
2,689
social housing
3,582
4.25%
HUME
existing
2,422
social housing
6,889
407
SCENARIO A I SOCIAL HOUSING BASED ON OVERALL SOCIAL HOUSING DISTRIBUTED EVENLY_
3.5%
social housing
86,676
408
>
3.5%
social housing
2,796
2,062
new
734
BRIMBANK
existing
new
DANDENONG
existing
2,689
107
existing
new
2,422
374
HUME 409
410
SCENARIO A CONCLUSIONS: DOES MELBOURNE’S CURRENT SOCIAL HOUSING APPROACH FIT WITHIN 20-MINUTE CITIES? at 3.65%: YES at 7% in Inner Ring LGA’s: YES at 7% in Outer Ring LGA’s: NO
411
SCENARIO TESTING _ ARE MELBOURNE’S 20-MINUTE CITIES FIT FOR SOCIAL HOUSING? If Melbourne’s current distribution of 20-minute cities does not meet the numbers and needs of those living in social housing, what next?
412
SCENARIO B: THE PYRAMID_
BROAD DEFINITION:
+
+
“The Government responds crises “by enacting policies that benefit the few, resulting in economic concentrat ion and inequity”. SCENARIO SPECIFIC DEFINITION:
If there are not enough activity centres to support Melbourne’s social housing demand for 2036, the government will exercise its authority to move residents to undesirable locations.
413
SCENARIO B | SOCIAL HOUSING LOCATIONS OUTSIDE OF SELECTED LGAS_
SECNARIO B | SOCIAL HOUSING LOCATIONS OUTSIDE OF SELECTED LGAS
414
Outside OUTSIDEofOFHume HUME LGALGA
Outside OUTSIDEofOFBrimbank BRIMBANK LGALGA
Outside OUTSIDEofOFDandenong DANDENONG LGALGA
33 Beauchamp Street, Heathcote VIC, 3523 33 Beauchamp Street, Heathcote VIC, 3523
1 McIntyre Dr, Altona, Victoria 1 McIntyre Dr, Altona, Victoria
15 Lecky Street, Cranbourne, Melbourne, 3977 15 Lecky Street, Cranbourne, Melbourne, 3977
33 Beauchamp Street, Heathcote VIC, 3523
ALTONA CHARACTER_
1 McIntyre Dr, Altona, Victoria
15 Lecky Street, Cranbourne, Melbourne, 3977
ALTONA NEIGHBOURHOOD CHARACTER
415
SCENARIO B | EXISTING ACTIVITY CENTRES AROUND ALTONA SOCIAL HOUSING & BIKE PATHS_
416
SCENARIO B | ALL TRANSPORT_
417
SCENARIO B | ALL EXISTING ZONES IN HOBSONS BAY LGA WITH TARGET LOTS_
C1Z GRZ1 IN1Z IN3Z MUZ PCRZ PPRZ PUZ1 PUZ2 PUZ4 PUZ5 PUZ6 RDZ1 SUZ3 SUZ4 SUZ5 UFZ
418
419
SCENARIO B | ALL EXISTING ZONES IN HOBSONS BAY LGA WITH TARGET LOTS_
C1Z GRZ1 IN1Z IN3Z MUZ PCRZ PPRZ PUZ1 PUZ2 PUZ4 PUZ5 PUZ6 RDZ1 SUZ3 SUZ4 SUZ5 UFZ
420
421
SCENARIO B | PROPOSAL OF NEW ACTIVITY CENTRES & PUBLIC TRANSPORT_ * Special Use Zones 3/4 to be rezoned to Mix Use Zones. * IN1Z to exist for employment for members of the community. * PCRZ to create a wind or renewable energy facility. C1Z GRZ1 IN1Z IN3Z MUZ PCRZ PPRZ PUZ1 PUZ2 PUZ4 PUZ5 PUZ6 RDZ1 SUZ3 SUZ4 SUZ5 UFZ
422
423
SCENARIO TESTING _ MELBOURNE AS ONE GREATER 20-MINUTE CITY Meeting Melbourne’s demand for social housing by finding and filling gaps between activity centres (20-minute neighbourhoods).
424
SCENARIO C: LEVIATHAN_
BROAD DEFINITION:
+
+
“Governments rapidly and dramatically expand their powers, but use it to deliver collective benefits and goals”. SCENARIO SPECIFIC DEFINITION:
Governments identify and implement the number of social housing required in each LGA to ensure that all people who are eligible for social housing are catered for, and thus implement a greater density of 20-minute neighbourhood’s to meet the needs of residents.
425
SCENARIO TESTING I SCENARIO C_ BRIMBANK TEST IN 2036 WITH 7% SOCIAL HOUSING STOCK IMPLEMENTED: There will need to be 5,705 social housing dwellings to house an ELIGIBLE POPULATION of 17,115. POPULATION DENSITY within major activity centre buffers will increase from 1,697 p/km2 to 2,142 p/km2 KEY FINDING: Brimbank will require an ADDITIONAL 1.1 of an activity centre in 2036 to service its surrounding social housing population. 426
427
SCENARIO TESTING I SCENARIO C_ GREATER DANDENONG TEST IN 2036 WITH 7% SOCIAL HOUSING STOCK IMPLEMENTED: There will need to be 5,275 social housing dwellings to house an ELIGIBLE POPULATION of 15,299. POPULATION DENSITY within major activity centre buffers will increase from 3,360 p/km2 to 3,371 p/km2 KEY FINDING: Greater Dandenong will require an ADDITIONAL 0.3 of an activity centre in 2036 to service its surrounding social housing population. 428
429
SCENARIO TESTING I SCENARIO C _ HUME TEST IN 2036 WITH 7% SOCIAL HOUSING STOCK IMPLEMENTED: There will need to be 7,768 social housing dwellings to house an ELIGIBLE POPULATION of 24,080. POPULATION DENSITY within major activity centre buffers will increase from 446 p/km2 to 860 p/km2 KEY FINDING: Hume will be able to support its social housing population in 2036 with its existing major activity centres *for a short term period. 430
431
SCENARIO C I SOCIAL HOUSING BASED ON LGA PERCENTAGE_
BRIMBANK
7%
social housing
DANDENONG
HUME 432
existing
2,062
new
3,112
7%
social housing
4,509 7%
existing
2,689
new
3,082
social housing
5,771
7%
existing
2,422
new
8,923
social housing
11,345
433
SCENARIO C I SOCIAL HOUSING BASED ON LGA AGGREGATE DISTRIBUTED EVENLY_
new social housing
110,786
434
new
3,574
>
BRIMBANK
existing
2,062
7.63%
social housing
5,636 7.60%
DANDENONG
existing
2,689
social housing
6,263
3.70%
HUME
existing
2,422
social housing
5,996
435
SCENARIO C I SOCIAL HOUSING BASED ON OVERALL SOCIAL HOUSING DISTRIBUTED EVENLY_
7%
social housing
169,794
436
>
7%
social housing
5,477
2,062
new
3,415
BRIMBANK
existing
new
DANDENONG
existing
2,689
2,788
existing
new
2,422
3,055
HUME 437
SCENARIO C | INCLUSIONARY ZONES_KEY INSIGHTS WHAT IS AN INCLUSIONARY ZONE?
TYPES OF INCLUSIONARY ZONING
“INCLUSIONARY ZONING IS A LAND USE PLANNING INTERVENTION BY GOVERNMENT THAT EITHER MANDATES OR CREATES INCENTIVES SO THAT A PROPORTION OF A RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT INCLUDES A NUMBER OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING DWELLINGS.”
1. MANDATORY MODEL “REQUIRES THAT A NUMBER OF AFFORDABLE HOMES ARE INCLUDED IN DEVELOPMENTS AS A CONDITION OF PLANNING APPROVAL.”
- AHURI, 2017
2. VOLUNTARY INCENTIVE MODEL “NEW AFFORDABLE HOUSING IS ENCOURAGED BY REDUCING COSTS FOR DEVELOPERS.” - AHURI, 2017
438
WHY DO WE NEED INCLUSIONARY ZONING IN MELBOURNE? “DECLINING HOUSING AFFORDABILITY IN AUSTRALIA HAS A DISTINCT SPATIAL COMPONENT; THAT IS, THE PROBLEMS ARE MARKEDLY WORSE IN SOME REGIONS THAN IN OTHERS. AS A RESULT, THE ROLE OF THE LAND USE PLANNING SYSTEM IN DELIVERING AN ADEQUATE AND TIMELY SUPPLY OF NEW HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES IS UNDER INTENSE SCRUTINY. ” “THE LAND USE PLANNING SYSTEM PLAYS A CRUCIAL ROLE IN DELIVERING NEW HOUSING SUPPLY IN PREFERRED LOCATIONS.” “...FUNDAMENTAL PLANNING POLICIES – SUCH AS DECISIONS TO CONTAIN URBAN GROWTH BY LIMITING THE RELEASE OF LAND FOR NEW DEVELOPMENT – ARE INHERENTLY INCONSISTENT WITH OVERALL AFFORDABILITY GOALS (BEER ET AL. 2007, MORAN 2006, WHITE AND ALLMENDINGER 2003, NELSON ET AL. 2002)” “DEDICATED GOVERNMENT FUNDING OR INCENTIVES FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT OFTEN SUPPORT THESE APPROACHES.” - NEW DIRECTIONS IN PLANNING FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING AUSTRALIAN AND INTERNATIONAL EVIDENCE AND IMPLICATIONS, 2018
METHODS FOR CREATING INCLUSIONARY HOUSING, AS IDENTIFIED BY AHURI SCALES OF INTERVENTION IN PLANNING FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING: 1. SYSTEM WIDE APPROACHES: HOUSING SUPPLY, SPATIAL AND HOSUING POLICY, GOVERNANCE OF RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT 2. METHODOLOGICAL OR PROCEDURAL APPROACHES – AT THE INTERMEDIATE LEVEL: IMPROVING PLANNING FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING, COLLABORATION IN HOUSING RESPONSES, VARYING LEVELS OF GOVERNMENT (EXAMPLE BELOW) 3. PLANNING MECHANISMS OR LEVERS – WITHIN A LOCAL JURISDICTION: PLANNING MECHANISMS AND LEVERS, ACHIEVE AFFORDABLE HOUSING TARGETS, CONTROLS TO PROTECT LOW COST STOCK, REGULATORY INCENTIVES PROMOTING LOW COST HOUSING IN PRIVATE SECTOR, DEDICATING SPECIFIC PROPORTION OF DEVELOPMENT VALUE TO AFFORDABLE HOUSING STRATEGIES - NEW DIRECTIONS IN PLANNING FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING AUSTRALIAN AND INTERNATIONAL EVIDENCE AND IMPLICATIONS, 2018
439
**
ALL INCLUSIONARY RESIDENTIAL ZONES TO ADHERE TO 7% SOCIAL HOUSING POLICIES. INCENTIVES AND GOVERNMENT SUPPORT FOR PRIVATE INVESTORS TO BUILD SOCIAL HOUSING. MANDATORY AND VOLUNTARY PROVISONS FOR SOCIAL HOUSING.
440
INCZ1
[Inclusionary Zoning 1] Inslusionary housing Affordable, accessible, inclusive.
INCZ2
INCZ3
[Inclusionary Zoning 2]
[Inclusionary Zoning 3]
Inclusionary Mixed Use Housing Affordable, accessible and inclusive. Access to most important amenity such as health care and financial support services. Access on-site to diverse food options and recreational activity.
Inclusionary Public Mixed Use Inclusive and accessible public amenity and recreation. Outdoor exercise equipment, places to pause, places of worship (other amenity we listed in poll)
441
SCENARIO C | INCLUSIONARY ZONES_KEY INSIGHTS
• “...remedy planning system deficiencies” • “...leverage more subsidised housing stock for low income people, in preferred locations, by making affordable housing inclusion a requirement of development” - Gurran et. al, New directions i n planning for affordable housing: A ustralian and international ” evidence and implications, 2008)
442
“...housing affordability is a rguably an implicit normative goal of spatial all planning policy across jurisdictions reviewed.” - Gurran et. al, New directions i n planning for affordable housing: A ustralian and international evidence and implications, 2008)
• “...recapture some of the gain associated with planning decisions, or to create additional gain through incentives. • “...planning systems to provide for and facilitate greater housing diversity in the allocation of land uses and in specifying design codes” - Gurran et. al, New directions i n planning for affordable housing: A ustralian and international evidence and implications, 2008)
SCENARIO C | HOW MUCH AFFORDABLE/SOCIAL HOUSING WILL WE NEED
NUMBER OF SOCIAL HOUSING REQUIRED BY 2036 HUME
7768
SOCIAL HOUSING
DWELLINGS TO HOUSE AN ELIGIBLE POPULATION OF
24080
NUMBER OF SOCIAL HOUSING REQUIRED BY 2036 BRIMBANK
5705
SOCIAL HOUSING
DWELLINGS TO HOUSE AN ELIGIBLE POPULATION OF
17115
NUMBER OF SOCIAL HOUSING REQUIRED BY 2036 GREATER DANDENONG
5275
SOCIAL HOUSING
DWELLINGS
TO HOUSE AN ELIGIBLE POPULATION OF
15 299
443
SCENARIO C | LEVIATHAN ACTIVITY CENTRE WORKFLOW STE
P1
444
STE
|M
APP
P2
ING
ACT
IVIT
YC
ENT
RES
STE
| EX
IN L
POR
P3
GAS
TK
ML
FIL
EA
ND
DRA
G IN
STE
| BU
TO
FFE
P4
QGI
R8
S
00M
POI
NT
DAT A
STE
| EX
P5
POR
TM
APS
WIT
W
HB
O
UFF
RK
ERS
FL
| CA
AND
O
DAS
TRE
LOT
S3
93740 M
2
LGA
W
C
HE
C
KP
O
IN
T!
STE
P6
STE
|M
APS
P7
OF
LOT
W
SW
O
ITH
IN L
RK
GAS
FL
O
AND
W
STE
|M
APS
P8
ZON
ING
W
, A/
O
C, L
PPT
RK
N
C
HE
C
OTS
KP
O
FL
IN
T!
AND
O
STE
| ID
P9
ENT
IFY
GAP
S IN
A/C
PTV
W
C
HE
C
KP
O
IN L
IN
GAS
T!
| 20
STE
P 10
MIN
UTE
NEI
W
GHB
O
OUR
RK
HOO
FL
DP
O
ZON
ED
MA
P1
PRE
C
ED O ENT EA RK CH FL LGA O W C
W
ROF
W
| RE
ILE
C
SA
ND
M HE APS C KP O
HE
IN
T!
C
KP
O
IN
T!
445
SCENARIO C | MAPPING ACTIVITY CENTRES STE
P1
STE
|M
P2
APP
ING
ACT
IVIT
YC
ENT
RES
STE
| EX
P3
IN L
POR
GAS
TK
ML
FIL
EA
ND
DRA
STE
| BU
P4
FFE
R8
00M
POIN
G IN
TD
TO
QGIS
ATA
STE
| EX
P5
POR
TM
APS
WIT
W
HB
O
UFF
RK
ERS
FL
AND
O
STE
| CA
P6
DAS
TRE
LOT
S3
93-7 40M
2
STE
|M
APS
P7
OF
LOT
W
LGA
W
C
HE
C
KP
O
SW
IN
T!
O
ITH
IN L
RK
GAS
FL
O
AND
W
STE
|M
APS
P8
ZON
ING
W
, A/
O
C, L
PPT
RK
N
C
HE
C
OTS
KP
FL
O
IN
T!
AND
O
STE
| ID
P9
ENT
IFY
GAP
S IN
A/C
PTV
W
C
HE
C
KP
O
IN L
GAS
IN
T!
| 20
STE
P 10
MIN
UTE
NEIG
W
O
HBO
URH
RK
OOD
FL
O
ZON
ED
MA
P1
PRE
C
ED O ENT EA RK CH FL LGA O W C
W
PRO
W
| RE
FIL
ES
C
AND
HE
MA
C
PS
KP
HE
O
IN
T!
C
KP
O
IN
T!
BRIMBANK ACTIVITY CENTRE STRATEGY • SUNSHINE HEALTH, WELLBEING AND EDUCATION PRECINCT (SHWEP) KEY COMPONENT TO SUNSHINE NATIONAL EMPLOYMENT AND INNOVATION CLUSTER
• LOCATED BETWEEN M80 WESTERN RING ROAD, GINIFER RAILWAY STATION, ST ALBANS, STONY CREEK AND ST ALBANS ROAD.
• SIMILAR CHARACTERISTICS TO AN ACTIVITY CENTRE
• INCREASE AMOUNT OF HOUSING THAT HAS GOOD ACCESS TO SERVICES, FACILITIES, TRANSPORT • IDENTIFY ZONES WITHIN TOWN CENTRES AND CHANGE THE PLANNING SCHEME PROVISIONS, REZOINING DISUSED INDUSTRIAL ZONES AND OTHER ZONES • DIVERSITY IN HOUSING AND HOUSING LOCATIONS
446
DATA WE INPUT INTO GOOGLE MY MAPS
ACTIVITY CENTRE MAPS FROM STRATEGY REPORT
447
SCENARIO C | MAPPING ACTIVITY CENTRES STE
P1
STE
|M
P2
APP
ING
ACT
IVIT
YC
ENT
RES
STE
| EX
P3
POR
TK
ML
IN L
GAS
FIL
EA
ND
DRA
STE
| BU
P4
FFE
R8
00M
POIN
TD
G IN
TO
ATA
QGIS
STE
| EX
P5
POR
TM
APS
WIT
W
HB
O
UFF
RK
ERS
FL
AND
O
STE
| CA
P6
DAS
TRE
LOT
S3
93-7 40M
2
LGA
W
C
HE
C
KP
O
STE
|M
APS
P7
OF
LOT
W
SW
O
ITH
IN L
RK
GAS
FL
O
AND
W
STE
|M
APS
C
N
HE
Hume will be having new development areas up to 40km from the cbd, so activity centres (metro, major, neighbourhood, local) need to be strategically planned and managed to meet the
Centre (future)
C, L
C
OTS
RK
PPT
T!
Broadmeadows, Donnybrook (Lockerbie) Town
, A/
O
HUME ACTIVITY CENTRES
METROPOLITAN ACTIVITY CENTRES (MAC)_
ING
W
IN
needs of residents.
P8
ZON
KP
O
FL
IN
T!
AND
O
STE
| ID
P9
ENT
IFY
GAP
S IN
A/C
PTV
W
C
HE
C
KP
O
IN L
GAS
| 20
STE
P 10
MIN
UTE
NEIG
W
O
HBO
URH
RK
OOD
FL
IN
T!
O
ZON
ED
MA
P1
PRE
C
ED O ENT EA RK CH FL LGA O W C
W
PRO
W
| RE
FIL
ES
C
AND
HE
MA
C
PS
KP
HE
O
IN
T!
C
KP
O
IN
T!
MAJOR ACTIVITY CENTRES_
Sunbury Town Centre, Roxburgh Park Shopping Centre, Craigieburn Town Centre, Gladstone Park Shopping Centre, Mickleham (Merrifield) Town Centre (future), and Sunbury South Town Centre (future).
NEIGHBOURHOOD CENTRES_
Campbellfield Plaza, Craigieburn Plaza, Meadow Heights, Greenvale, Westmeadows Village, Dallas, Olsen Place, Tullamarine, Upfield, Highlands Shopping Centre, Homestead Place and Gap Road (Sunbury). New Neighbourhood Centres planned in developing areas of the City
448
“To establish Donnybrook (Lockerbie) as a vibrant mixed use and economic hub which provides a focal point for the northern part of the Melbourne Northern Sub Region.” “To establish Broadmeadows Metropolitan Activity Centre as a premier activity centre in the Melbourne Northern Sub Region with a diverse range of retail, commercial, educational, cultural, community and leisure facilities” - Activity Centres, Hume Planning Scheme
449
SCENARIO C | MAPPING ACTIVITY CENTRES STE
P1
STE
|M
P2
APP
ING
ACT
IVIT
YC
ENT
RES
STE
| EX
P3
IN L
POR
GAS
TK
ML
FIL
EA
ND
DRA
STE
| BU
P4
FFE
R8
00M
POIN
STE
| EX
P5
POR
TM
G IN
TD
TO
ATA
QGIS
APS
WIT
W
HB
O
UFF
RK
ERS
FL
AND
O
STE
| CA
P6
DAS
TRE
LOT
S3
93-7 40M
2
STE
|M
APS
P7
OF
LOT
W
LGA
W
C
HE
C
SW
O
STE
|M
APS
P8
ZON
ITH
ING
W
IN L
O
IN
T!
P9
ENT
IFY
C, L
O
G RK AS AND FL P O PTN W C HE
C
KP
, A/
STE
| ID
HE
O
S IN
OTS
RK AND P FL TV O W C
KP
GAP
IN
T!
C
KP
A/C
O
IN L
IN
GAS
T!
| 20
STE
P 10
MIN
UTE
NEIG
W
| RE
ZON
ED
HBO
URH
MA
P1
PRE
CE
W DENT O O RK OD PR RK EACH FL OFILE FL LGA O S O W AND W C MAPS C HE HE C C KP KP O O IN IN T! T!
O
GREATER DANDENONG ACTIVITY CENTRES • NCPF assessment on performance of greater dandenong • local shopping areas • established a neighbourhood centre hierarchy based on agreed criteria • aligns with metropolitan and local planning strategy • local economic conditions. - ordinary council meeting 160808, 2016
450
451
SCENARIO C | EXPORTING KML FILES INTO QGIS STE
P1
452
STE
|M
P2
APP
ING
ACT
IVIT
YC
ENT
RES
STE
| EX
P3
IN L
POR
GAS
TK
ML
FIL
EA
ND
DRA
STE
| BU
P4
FFE
R8
00M
POIN
G IN
TD
TO
QGIS
ATA
STE
| EX
P5
POR
TM
APS
WIT
W
HB
O
UFF
RK
ERS
FL
AND
O
STE
| CA
P6
DAS
TRE
LOT
S3
93-7 40M
2
LGA
W
C
HE
C
STE
|M
APS
P7
OF
LOT
W
SW
O
STE
|M
APS
P8
ZON
ITH
ING
W
IN L
O
IN
T!
P9
ENT
IFY
C, L
O
G RK AS AND FL P O PTN W C HE
C
KP
, A/
STE
| ID
HE
O
S IN
OTS
RK AND P FL TV O W C
KP
GAP
IN
T!
C
KP
A/C
O
IN L
IN
GAS
T!
| 20
STE
P 10
MIN
UTE
NEIG
W
HBO
URH
| RE
ZON
ED
MA
P1
PRE
CE
W DENT O O RK OD PR RK EACH FL OFILE FL LGA O S O W AND W C MAPS C HE HE C C KP KP O O IN IN T! T!
O
453
SCENARIO C | BUFFERING 800M (10 MIN) CATCHMENTS FROM ACTIVITY CENTRES STE
P1
STE
|M
P2
APP
ING
ACT
IVIT
YC
ENT
RES
STE
| EX
P3
POR
TK
ML
FIL
EA
IN L
GAS
ND
DRA
STE
| BU
P4
FFE
R8
00M
POIN
G IN
TD
TO
QGIS
ATA
STE
| EX
P5
POR
TM
APS
WIT
W
HB
O
UFF
RK
ERS
FL
AND
O
STE
| CA
P6
DAS
TRE
LOT
S3
93-7 40M
2
LGA
W
C
HE
C
STE
|M
APS
P7
OF
LOT
W
SW
O
STE
|M
APS
P8
ZON
ITH
ING
W
IN L
O
IN
T!
P9
ENT
IFY
C, L
O
G RK AS AND FL P O PTN W C HE
C
KP
, A/
STE
| ID
HE
O
S IN
OTS
RK AND P FL TV O W C
KP
GAP
IN
T!
C
KP
A/C
O
IN L
IN
GAS
T!
| 20
STE
P 10
MIN
UTE
NEIG
W
HBO
URH
| RE
ZON
ED
MA
P1
PRE
CE
W DENT O O RK OD PR RK EACH FL OFILE FL LGA O S O W AND W C MAPS C HE HE C C KP KP O O IN IN T! T!
O
WHY 800M (10 MIN) BUFFERS? 800m is 10 minutes average walking pace of 1.33m/s • 10 min one way creates a 20 minute round-trip, which is truly a 20 minute neighbourhood • 10 minutes to destinations is more accessible for people with mobility impairments and other disabilities
454
455
SCENARIO C | CHECKPOINT 1_BRIMBANK, HUME, GREATER DANDENONG STE
P1
STE
|M
P2
APP
ING
ACT
IVIT
YC
ENT
RES
STE
| EX
P3
POR
TK
ML
IN L
GAS
FIL
EA
ND
DRA
STE
| BU
P4
FFE
R8
00M
POIN
G IN
TD
TO
QGIS
ATA
STE
| EX
P5
POR
TM
APS
WIT
W
HB
O
UFF
RK
ERS
FL
AND
O
STE
| CA
P6
DAS
TRE
LOT
S3
93-7 40M
2
LGA
W
C
HE
C
STE
|M
APS
P7
OF
LOT
W
SW
O
STE
|M
APS
P8
ZON
ITH
ING
W
IN L
O
IN
T!
P9
ENT
IFY
C, L
O
G RK AS AND FL P O PTN W C HE
C
KP
, A/
STE
| ID
HE
O
S IN
OTS
RK AND P FL TV O W C
KP
GAP
IN
T!
C
KP
A/C
O
IN L
GAS
| 20
STE
P 10
MIN
UTE
NEIG
W
T!
URH
| RE
ZON
ED
MA
P1
PRE
CE
W DENT O O RK OD PR RK EACH FL OFILE FL LGA O S O W AND W C MAPS C HE HE C C KP KP O O IN IN T! T!
O
IN
HBO
KEY INSIGHTS:
• Hume is the most sporadic with its activity centres • brimbank has quite a few major and neighbourhood activity centres, however they service a lot of the same areas, meaning there are large portions of residents who miss out on accessible amenity within their beighbourhoods • greater dandenong has a high concentration of all kinds of activity centres further north • greater dandenong does not currently have much density south • some of the few residencies close to the south to lose out on connectivity to amenity • there are large roads spanning lots of the greater dandenong region, causing some sever gaps in activity centres and walkability
456
Brimbank activity centres Brimbank Major Activity and Metro Activity Centres Brimbank Activity Centres 800m Catchment Brimbank Cadastre OpenStreetMap
Bike networks hume Greater Dandenong Activity Centres
Principle bike network hume
Greater Dandenong Activity centre buffers copy
Strategic cycling corridor hume
Neighbourhood centre GD buffer 800
Hume activity centres
Large Neighbourhood Centre GD 800 buffer
neighbourhood activity cnetres buffered hume
Large Local Shop Node GD 800 buffer Local Shop Node GD 800 buffer
Major and metro activity centres Hume
Dandenong Cadastre
Gladstone Shoping Centre 800m Catchment
OpenStreetMap
Hume activity centres Hume Cadastre
OpenStreetMap
Brimbank Existing Major and Local Activity Centres
Activity Centres Greater Dandenong Cadastre
Activity Centres Hume City
457
SCENARIO C | CADASTRE LOTS 393-740M2 STE
P1
STE
|M
P2
APP
ING
ACT
IVIT
YC
ENT
RES
STE
| EX
P3
POR
TK
ML
IN L
GAS
FIL
EA
ND
DRA
STE
| BU
P4
FFE
R8
00M
POIN
G IN
TD
TO
QGIS
ATA
STE
| EX
P5
POR
TM
APS
WIT
W
HB
O
UFF
RK
ERS
FL
AND
O
STE
| CA
P6
DAS
TRE
LOT
S3
93-7 40M
2
LGA
W
C
HE
C
STE
|M
APS
P7
OF
LOT
W
SW
O
STE
|M
APS
P8
ZON
ITH
ING
W
IN L
O
IN
T!
P9
ENT
IFY
C, L
O
G RK AS AND FL P O PTN W C HE
C
KP
, A/
STE
| ID
HE
O
S IN
OTS
RK AND P FL TV O W C
KP
GAP
IN
T!
C
A/C
KP
O
IN L
IN
GAS
T!
| 20
STE
P 10
MIN
UTE
NEIG
W
HBO
URH
| RE
ZON
ED
MA
P1
PRE
CE
W DENT O O RK OD PR RK EACH FL OFILE FL LGA O S O W AND W C MAPS C HE HE C C KP KP O O IN IN T! T!
O
WHY 393-740?
This is based on the 2019 average size of lots within metropolitan melbourne, which dissapointedly is lower than the averagein 2018 (“the median lot size for Melbourne was just 393sq m at the end of June this year — 27sq m less than three years ago. At the same time last year it was 400sq m, and 420sq m in June 2016”) - Mawby, 2019
WHY SHOW LOTS?
This indicates where people actually live. this way it is easer to determine where residents are outside activity centres, and if they would need a 20 minute neighbourhood intervention.
458
459
SCENARIO C | CHECKPOINT 2_BRIMBANK STE
P1
STE
|M
P2
APP
ING
ACT
IVIT
YC
ENT
RES
STE
| EX
P3
POR
TK
IN L
GAS
ML
FIL
EA
ND
DRA
STE
| BU
P4
FFE
R8
00M
POIN
TD
G IN
TO
STE
| EX
ATA
QGIS
P5
POR
TM
APS
WIT
W
HB
O
UFF
RK
ERS
FL
AND
O
STE
| CA
P6
DAS
TRE
LOT
S3
93-7 40M
2
LGA
W
C
HE
C
STE
|M
APS
P7
OF
LOT
W
SW
O
STE
|M
APS
P8
ZON
ITH
ING
W
IN L
O
IN
T!
P9
ENT
IFY
C, L
O
G RK AS AND FL P O PTN W C HE
C
KP
, A/
STE
| ID
HE
O
S IN
OTS
RK AND P FL TV O W C
KP
GAP
IN
T!
C
KP
A/C
O
IN L
IN
GAS
T!
| 20
STE
P 10
MIN
UTE
NEIG
W
HBO
URH
| RE
ZON
ED
MA
P1
PRE
CE
W DENT O O RK OD PR RK EACH FL OFILE FL LGA O S O W AND W C MAPS C HE HE C C KP KP O O IN IN T! T!
O
KEY INSIGHTS
• Hume has very little pptn connections, especially as it goes further north and north west • Brimbank has more pptn frequency cutting through it, however some key residential zones are missed in existing pptn • Greater Dandenong is a key transit area, so has pptn lines running through it • neighbourhoods closer to the cbd benefit from more access to pptn network • the metro and regional trains do pass through a lot of the areas missed by the pptn lines. more minor stations could be added along these lines to extend the pptn in all lgas
460
Greater Dandenong Activity Centres
Train Line TR_RAIL
Greater Dandenong Activity centre buffers copy
Brimbank
Neighbourhood centre GD buffer 800
Brimbank Strategic Cycling corridor
Large Neighbourhood Centre GD 800 buffer
Brimbank principle cycling network Brimbank municipal bike network
Large Local Shop Node GD 800 buffer
Brimbank activity centres
Local Shop Node GD 800 buffer
Brimbank Major Activity and Metro Activity Centres copy
Train Line
Brimbank Local and Neighbourhood Activity Centres 800m Catchment
TR_RAIL
393-740 lots brimbank PPTN within Brimbank 2
greater dandnenong 393-740 lots
Brimbank LGA
pptn buffer
OpenStreetMap
EXTRACT_POLYGON
OpenStreetMap
Existing 393-740 Lots Hume City with PPTN and Activity Centres Bikes paths TR_RAIL PTV_METRO_TRAIN_STATION
Hume activity centres neighbourhood activity cnetres buffered hume Major and metro activity centres Hume Gladstone Shoping Centre 800m Catchment Hume activity centres
Brimbank Lots and Activity Centres with PPTN and Train Line
PPTN hume
Bike networks hume Strategic cycling corridor hume Principle bike network hume
Greater Dandenong 393-740 lots, Activity Centres and PPTN
393-740 lots in hume Hume LGA
OpenStreetMap
461
SCENARIO C | MAPS OF ZONING OVERLAYS WITH ACTIVITY CENTRES AND PPTN STE
P1
STE
|M
P2
APP
ING
ACT
IVIT
YC
ENT
RES
STE
| EX
P3
IN L
POR
GAS
TK
ML
FIL
EA
ND
DRA
STE
| BU
P4
FFE
R8
00M
POIN
G IN
TD
TO
QGIS
GREATER DANDENONG
ATA
STE
| EX
P5
POR
TM
APS
WIT
W
HB
O
UFF
RK
ERS
FL
AND
O
STE
| CA
P6
DAS
TRE
LOT
S3
93-7 40M
2
LGA
W
C
HE
C
STE
|M
APS
P7
OF
LOT
W
SW
O
STE
|M
APS
P8
ZON
ITH
ING
W
IN L
O
IN
T!
P9
ENT
IFY
C, L
O
G RK AS AND FL P O PTN W C HE
C
KP
, A/
STE
| ID
HE
O
S IN
OTS
RK AND P FL TV O W C
KP
GAP
IN
T!
C
KP
A/C
O
IN L
IN
GAS
T!
| 20
STE
P 10
MIN
UTE
NEIG
W
HBO
URH
| RE
ZON
ED
MA
P1
PRE
CE
W DENT O O RK OD PR RK EACH FL OFILE FL LGA O S O W AND W C MAPS C HE HE C C KP KP O O IN IN T! T!
O
Greater Dandenong Activity Centres Greater Dandenong Activity centre buffers copy Neighbourhood centre GD buffer 800 Large Neighbourhood Centre GD 800 buffer
Train Line TR_RAIL
Planning scheme zones Greater Dandenong Planning Zones C1Z C2Z CDZ1 CDZ2 FZ GRZ1 GWAZ GWZ IN1Z IN3Z MUZ NRZ1 PCRZ PPRZ PUZ1 PUZ2 PUZ3 PUZ4 PUZ5 PUZ6 PUZ7 RDZ1 RDZ2 SUZ1 SUZ2 SUZ4 SUZ5 SUZ6 UFZ GRZ2 GRZ3 IN2Z NRZ4 RGZ1 RGZ2 SUZ3
OpenStreetMap
Major, Neighbourhood and Large Neighbourhood Activity Centres and zoning overlay Greater Dandenong
462
Large Local Shop Nodes and Local Shop Nodes with Planning Zones Greater Dandenong
HUME CITY COUNCIL
Bikes paths TR_RAIL
Hume activity centres
neighbourhood activity cnetres buffered hume Major and metro activity centres Hume Gladstone Shoping Centre 800m Catchment Hume activity centres
Planning scheme zones Hume Planning Zones
Greater Dandenong Activity Centres Large Local Shop Node GD 800 buffer Local Shop Node GD 800 buffer
Train Line TR_RAIL
Planning scheme zones Greater Dandenong Planning Zones C1Z C2Z CDZ1 CDZ2 FZ GRZ1
Hume City Activity Centres GWAZ and Planning Zones with PPTN GWZ and Train Line IN1Z IN3Z MUZ NRZ1 PCRZ PPRZ PUZ1 PUZ2 PUZ3 PUZ4 PUZ5 PUZ6 PUZ7 RDZ1 RDZ2 SUZ1 SUZ2 SUZ4 SUZ5 UFZ GRZ2
C1Z C2Z CA CDZ1 CDZ2 CDZ3 CDZ4 CDZ5 FZ FZ1 FZ3 GRZ1 GWAZ GWZ IN1Z IN3Z LDRZ LDRZ1 MUZ NRZ1 PCRZ PPRZ PUZ1 PUZ2 PUZ3 PUZ4 PUZ5 PUZ6 PUZ7 RCZ RCZ1 RCZ2 RCZ3 RCZ4 RDZ1 RDZ2 RGZ RLZ RLZ1 RLZ3 RLZ5 SUZ1 SUZ10 SUZ11 SUZ2 SUZ4 SUZ5 SUZ6 SUZ7 SUZ8 SUZ9 TZ UFZ UGZ UGZ1 UGZ10 UGZ11 UGZ2 UGZ3 UGZ4 UGZ5 UGZ6 UGZ7 UGZ8 UGZ9 PPTN hume
BRIMBANK CITY COUNCIL
Bike networks hume
Strategic cycling corridor hume Principle bike network hume 633-653 lots hume city
OpenStreetMap
Brimbank Planning Zones and Activity Centres Existing
Train Line TR_RAIL
Brimbank Brimbank Strategic Cycling corridor Brimbank principle cycling network Brimbank municipal bike network
Brimbank activity centres Brimbank Major Activity and Metro Activity Centres Brimbank Local and Neighbourhood Activity Centres 800m Catchment
Planning scheme zones Brimbank Planning Zones C1Z C2Z CA CDZ1 CDZ2 GRZ1 GWAZ GWZ IN1Z IN3Z MUZ NRZ1 PCRZ PPRZ PUZ1 PUZ2 PUZ3 PUZ4 PUZ5 PUZ6 PUZ7 RCZ RDZ1 RDZ2 SUZ1 SUZ2 SUZ4 SUZ5 SUZ6 UFZ ACZ1 GRZ2 GRZ3 IN2Z NRZ2 RGZ1
OpenStreetMap
GRZ3 IN2Z NRZ4 RGZ1 RGZ2 SUZ3
OpenStreetMap
463
SCENARIO C | IDENTIFY GAPS IN ACTIVITY CENTRES STE
P1
464
STE
|M
P2
APP
ING
ACT
IVIT
YC
ENT
RES
STE
| EX
P3
IN L
POR
GAS
TK
ML
FIL
EA
ND
DRA
STE
| BU
P4
FFE
R8
00M
POIN
TD
G IN
TO
QGIS
ATA
STE
| EX
P5
POR
TM
APS
WIT
W
HB
O
UFF
RK
ERS
FL
AND
O
STE
| CA
P6
DAS
TRE
LOT
S3
93-7 40M
2
LGA
W
C
HE
C
STE
|M
APS
P7
OF
LOT
SW
W
STE
|M
APS
ZON
ING
ITH
O
IN
T!
STE
| ID
P9
ENT
IFY
C, L
HE
KP
O
GAP
S IN
O
TS RK AND P FL TV O W C
O
C
KP
, A/
W
IN
LG RK AS AND FL P O PTN W C HE
O
P8
IN
T!
C
KP
A/C
O
IN L
IN
GAS
T!
| 20
STE
P 10
MIN
UTE
NEIG
W
HBO
UR
BRIMBANK GAPS (8) | RE
ZON
ED
MA
P1
PRE
CE
HO W DENT O RK OD PR RK EACH FL OFILE FL LGA O S O W AND W C MAPS C HE HE C C KP KP O O IN IN T! T!
O
HUME GAPS (9)
GREATER DANDENONG GAPS (7) 3
1
7
2
4
6 5
465
SCENARIO C | IDENTIFY GAPS IN ACTIVITY CENTRES_ADDRESSES STE
P1
466
STE
|M
APP
P2
ING
ACT
IVIT
YC
ENT
RES
STE
| EX
IN L
POR
P3
GAS
TK
ML
FIL
EA
ND
DRA
STE
| BU
FFE
P4
R8
00M
POIN
G IN
TD
TO
QGIS
ATA
| EX
STE POR
P5
TM
APS
WIT
W
HB
O
UFF
RK
ERS
FL
| CA
AND
O
STE
P6
DAS
TRE
LOT
S3
93-7 40M
2
LGA
W
C
HE
C
|M
STE APS
P7
OF
LOT
SW
W
O
STE
|M
APS
P8
ZON
ING
ITH
O
IN
T!
| ID
P9
ENT
IFY
C, L
O
G RK AS AND FL P O PTN W C HE
C
KP
, A/
W
IN L
STE
RK AND P FL TV O W C
HE
KP
O
GAP
S IN
OTS
IN
T!
C
KP
A/C
O
IN L
IN
GAS
T!
| 20
STE MIN
P 10
UTE
NEIG
W
HBO
URH
| RE
ZON
ED
MA
P1
PRE
SELECTED BRIMBANK ACTIVITY CENTRES FOR TESTING AND REZONING : CE
W DENT O O RK OD PR RK EACH FL OFILE FL LGA O S O W AND W C MAPS C HE HE C C KP KP O O IN IN T! T!
O
• Kings Road, Delahey, VIC • 38 Main Road, Kealba, VIC
SELECTED HUME ACTIVITY CENTRES FOR TESTING AND REZONING :
SELECTED DANDENONG ACTIVITY CENTRES FOR TESTING AND REZONING :
• Cahill Street, Bulla, VIC
• 112 Carlton Road, Dandenong North, VIC
• Donnybrook Road, Donnybrook, VIC
• Kirkham Road, Dandenong, VIC
467
SCENARIO C | NEW NEIGHBOURHOOD PERSONAS/PROFILES_BRIMBANK ADDRESS: 38 MAIN ROAD KEALBA, BRIMBANK LGA, VIC ABOUT: Car-Dependent neighborhood so most errands require a car. Kealba neighborhood in Melbourne. Nearby parks include Grantham Green Public Reserve, Brimbank Park and Sterling Reserve.
- WalkScore, 2020
80-100 APT WALKSCORE
468
39 WALKSCORE
39 TRANSIT SCORE
KEY ISSUES:
PROPOSAL:
PROBLEMATIC LANDFILL KEALBA LANDFILL.
• RELOCATE LANDFILL TO ANNANDALE ROAD CA ZONE (COMMONWEALTH ZONE) AS IT IS SURROUNDED BY INDUSTRIAL ZONES, GREEN WEDGES AND OTHER CA ZONES, DOES NOT DIRECTLY ABUT RESIDENTIAL ZONES
NOT WALKABLE
NOT EASILY ACCESSIBLE TO PPTN AND TRANSPORT
• CONVERT THE LANDFILL TO A GREEN WEDGE OR PUBLIC PARK AND CONSERVATION ZONE. THIS WOULD ATTRACT TOURISM, INCREASE LIVEABILITY OF THE NEIGHBOURHOOD CATCHMENT, ABOLISH TOXINS IN THE AIR FROM LANDFILL AND ALLOW FOR MORE COMMERCIAL/TOURISM AND RECREATIONAL AMENITY. • STREET FRONTAGE OF INDUSTRIAL ZONE TO BE CONVERTED TO MIXED USE COMMERCIAL INCLUSION ZONE (INCZ3) • EXISTING RESIDENTIAL TO HAVE AT LEAST 7% INCZ1 AND INCZ2 ZONES (INCLUSIVE OF BOTH).
RING ROAD SEPARATIONS
• CONNECTIONS FROM WEST TO EAST TO BE MADE THROUGH ROAD OVER RAIL CONNECTIONS (CONNECTING EXISTING STREETS) • CONNECTING ROADS TO HAVE VELOWAYS OR PEDESTRIAN FRIENDLY LANES/CYCLIST LANES EITHER SIDE TO ALLOW FOR PEDESTRIAN TRANSIT
NO PEDESTRIAN OR RESISDENT FOCUS
• EXTENSION OF EXISTING CYCLIST PATHS ALONG WESTERN RING ROAD • INCLUDE INCLUSIONARY ZONING WITHIN PU, CA AND SU ZONES
469
SCENARIO C | NEW NEIGHBOURHOOD ACTIVITY CENTRES_BRIMBANK_38 MAIN ROAD, KEALBA PROPOSED ZONING Kealba Existing Zoning and Neighbourhood Activity Centre Landfill relocation
Train Line TR_RAIL
PTV_METRO_TRAIN_STATION 393-740 lots in hume
Brimbank Brimbank Strategic Cycling corridor Brimbank principle cycling network Brimbank municipal bike network
Brimbank activity centres Brimbank Major Activity and Metro Activity Centres Brimbank Local and Neighbourhood Activity Centres 800m Catchment
Planning scheme zones Hume Planning Zones C1Z C2Z CA GRZ1 GWZ IN1Z IN3Z PPRZ PUZ1 PUZ2 RCZ RDZ1 RDZ2
Brimbank Planning Zones C1Z C2Z CA GRZ1 GWAZ GWZ IN1Z IN3Z MUZ NRZ1 PCRZ PPRZ PUZ1 PUZ2 PUZ3 PUZ4 PUZ5 PUZ6 PUZ7 RCZ RDZ1 RDZ2 SUZ1 SUZ2 SUZ5 SUZ6 UFZ GRZ2 NRZ2 RGZ1 393-740 lots brimbank within lga
OpenStreetMap
470
Kealba Existing Neighbourhood Landfill relocatio
ting Zoning and ood Activity Centre cation
Train Line TR_RAIL
PTV_METRO_TRAIN_STATION 393-740 lots in hume
Brimbank Brimbank Strategic Cycling corridor Brimbank principle cycling network Brimbank municipal bike network
MAJOR ACTIVITY CENTRE
Brimba Brimbank Local and Neigh
Brimbank activity centres
Brimbank Major Activity and Metro Activity Centres Neighbourhood Activity Centres 800m Catchment
Planning scheme zones Hume Planning Zones C1Z C2Z CA GRZ1 GWZ IN1Z IN3Z PPRZ PUZ1 PUZ2 RCZ RDZ1 RDZ2
Brimbank Planning Zones C1Z C2Z CA GRZ1 GWAZ GWZ IN1Z IN3Z MUZ NRZ1 PCRZ PPRZ PUZ1 PUZ2 PUZ3 PUZ4 PUZ5 PUZ6 PUZ7 RCZ RDZ1 RDZ2 SUZ1 SUZ2 SUZ5 SUZ6 UFZ GRZ2 NRZ2 RGZ1 393-740 lots brimbank within lga
INZ1 PPRZ INCZ1 INCZ3 PED CONNECTIONS
OpenStreetMap
471
SCENARIO C | NEW NEIGHBOURHOOD PERSONAS/PROFILES ADDRESS: KINGS ROAD, DELAHEY, BRIMBANK , VIC ABOUT: Car-Dependent neighborhood so most errands require a car. 18 minute walk from the Sunbury City (Flinders Street) - Sunbury at the Keilor Plains Railway Station (St Albans) stop. Delahey neighborhood in Melbourne. Nearby parks include Delahey Emerald Park, Cyril Clements Reserve and Tenterfield Park.
- WalkScore, 2020
80-100 APT WALKSCORE
472
37 WALKSCORE
42 TRANSIT SCORE
KEY ISSUES:
PROPOSAL:
VERY LOW WALK SCORE
• REPLACE SUZ2 WITH NEW INCZ1,2 AND 3 ZONES TO FACILITATE AFFORDBALE/ACCESSIBLE/INCLUSIVE HOUSING WITHIN ZONE, MIXED USE AFFORDABLE HOUSING AS WELL AS MIXED USE INCLUSIVE COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL. THIS TO BE INCORPORATED WITH PUZ3 TRANSPORT ZONE AND INCORPORATE SYDENHAM DRIVE ALONG THE RAIL
18 MIN WALK FROM ST ALBANS TRAIN STATION HOWEVER UNSAFE WALKING AN INEFFICIENT WALKING PATH
LARGE ROADS INTERSECTING (TAYLORS ROAD AND KINGS ROAD) NOT PERMEABLE
• POTENTIALLY NEW MINOR STATION (TRAIN) TO BE ADDED CLOSE TO SYDENHAM AND LADY NELSON INTERSECTION TO CREATE MORE WALKABILITY AND SAFE COMMUTE, ALSO INCREASE TRANSIT SCORE • PUBLIC PARK AND RECREATION ZONES WITHIN LARGE EXPANSE. • PEDESTRIAN PRIORITY ACCESS ACROSS MAIN ROADS (TRAFFIC LIGHTS, LOWER SPEED LIMITS DUE TO ACTIVITY CENTRE
LARGE SPECIAL USE ZONE (AMBIGUOUS WITH INTENTION OF THIS ZONE, SHOULD BE SPECIFIED BASED ON ADJACENT LAND ZONES)
• CONNECT EXISTING BIKE PATHS TO NEW POTENTIAL MINOR TRAIN STATION AND RESIDENTIAL/COMMERCIAL • INCLUDE INCLUSIONARY ZONING WITHIN PU, CA AND SU ZONES
ADJACENT LAND ZONES PUZ3 (TRANSPORT). NRZ1 (2 MAX LOTS NOT TALLER THAN 2 STORY DWELLINGS) AND RDZ1 (LIMITATIONS TO KINGS ROAD UPDATES). THESE INFLUENCE THE SUZ2
INADEQUATE AMENITY TO SERVICE THE 800M CATCHMENT
473
SCENARIO C | NEW NEIGHBOURHOOD ACTIVITY CENTRES_BRIMBANK_KINGS RO
SCENARIO C | NEW NEIGHBOURHOOD ACTIVITY CENTRES_BRIMBANK_KINGS ROAD, DELAHEY PROPOSED ZONING Brimbank Kings Road New Activity Centre with lots and zoning overlay
Train Line TR_RAIL
Brimbank
Brimbank Kings Road New Activity Centre with lots and zoning overlay
Train Line TR_RAIL
Brimbank Strategic Cycling corridor Brimbank principle cycling network
Brimbank activity centres
Brimbank Brimbank Strategic Cycling corridor
Brimbank Major Activity and Metro Activity Centres copy Brimbank Local and Neighbourhood Activity Centres 800m Catchment
Planning scheme zones Brimbank Planning Zones
Brimbank principle cycling network
Brimbank activity centres Brimbank Major Activity and Metro Activity Centres copy
C1Z CDZ1 CDZ2 GRZ1
Brimbank Local and Neighbourhood Activity Centres 800m Catchment
Planning scheme zones
GWZ IN3Z MUZ
Brimbank Planning Zones C1Z
NRZ1 PCRZ PPRZ PUZ1
CDZ1 CDZ2 GRZ1
PUZ2 PUZ4
GWZ
PUZ6
IN3Z
RCZ RDZ1 SUZ2 UFZ
MUZ NRZ1 PCRZ
RGZ1 393-740 lots brimbank
OpenStreetMap
PPRZ PUZ1 PUZ2 PUZ4 PUZ6 RCZ RDZ1 SUZ2 UFZ RGZ1
474
393-740 lots brimbank
OpenStreetMap
CTIVITY CENTRES_BRIMBANK_KINGS ROAD, DELAHEY, VIC PROPOSED ZONING
nt
MAJOR ACTIVITY CENTRE INZ1 PPRZ INCZ1 INCZ2 INCZ3 PED CONNECTIONS PROPOSED MINOR STATION
475
SCENARIO C | NEW NEIGHBOURHOOD PERSONAS/PROFILES_HUME_ CAHILL STREET, BULLA ADDRESS: CAHILL ST, BULLA, VIC, HUME
476
14 WALKSCORE
0 TRANSIT SCORE
KEY ISSUES:
PROPOSAL:
VERY LOW WALK SCORE
• PART OF A CONNECTION WITH SUNNINGDALE AND ELEVATION BLVD IN CRAIGIEBURN, CREATING THREE MORE CONNECTED ACTIVITY CENTRE NODES
CLOSE TO AIRPORT BUT ONLY BY CAR
• CONNECT NEARBY CRAIGIEBURN ROAD ACROSS DEEP CREEK TOWARDS WILLWOOD ROAD
UNDERUTILISING EXISTING ZONES
UNDERUTILISING EXISTING BIKE PATHS
• ST JOHNS ROAD IN BULLA TO CONNECT NORTHWARDS TO CRAIGIEBURN ROAD • BIKE PATH EXISTING FROM SOMERTON ROAD TO EXTEND ALONG WILLWOOD ROAD AND CONNECT WITH NEW DEEP CREEK BIKE PATH. EVENTUALLY THIS BIKE PATH TO CONNECT UP WITH WILWOO ROCK ENDURO PARK. • CONNECT BIKE PATH ON SOMERTON ROAD WITH OAKLANDS ROAD. CONNECT WITH DEEP CREEK BIKE PATH FURTHER UP NORTH.
NOT MUCH DIVERSITY OF HIOUSING OR AMENITY
• MORE PARKS AND URBAN CONSERVATION IN GREEN WEDGE (GW) ZONES. • IMPLEMENT 8 HA MINIMUM RURAL RESIDENTIAL LOTS FOR FARMING AND POTENTIAL MARKETS THROUGH RRZ AND GW ZONES. • INCLUDE INCLUSIONARY ZONING WITHIN PU, CA AND SU ZONES
477
SCENARIO C | NEW NEIGHBOURHOOD ACTIVITY CENTRES_HUME_ CAHILL S
SCENARIO C | NEW NEIGHBOURHOOD ACTIVITY CENTRES_HUME_ CAHILL STREET, BULLA_PROPOSED ZONING
Yuroke, Bulla and Wilwood Potential Activity Centres
Train Line TR_RAIL
Hume activity centres
neighbourhood activity cnetres buffered hume Major and metro activity centres Hume Hume Major and Metro Activity Centres 393-740 lots in hume
Planning scheme zones Hume Planning Zones C1Z C2Z CA CDZ1 CDZ2 CDZ3 CDZ4 CDZ5 FZ FZ1 FZ3 GRZ1 GWAZ GWZ IN1Z IN3Z LDRZ LDRZ1 MUZ NRZ1 PCRZ PPRZ PUZ1 PUZ2 PUZ3 PUZ4 PUZ5 PUZ6 PUZ7 RCZ RCZ1 RCZ3 RDZ1 RDZ2 RLZ RLZ1 SUZ1 SUZ10 SUZ11 SUZ2 SUZ6 SUZ7 SUZ9 TZ UFZ UGZ UGZ1 UGZ10 UGZ11 UGZ2 UGZ3 UGZ4 UGZ6 UGZ7 UGZ9 PPTN hume
Bike networks hume
Strategic cycling corridor hume Principle bike network hume 633-653 lots hume city
OpenStreetMap
478
TY CENTRES_HUME_ CAHILL STREET, BULLA_PROPOSED ZONING
and Wilwood tivity Centres
Train Line TR_RAIL
Hume activity centres
urhood activity cnetres buffered hume Major and metro activity centres Hume Hume Major and Metro Activity Centres 393-740 lots in hume
MAJOR ACTIVITY CENTRE
Planning scheme zones Hume Planning Zones C1Z C2Z CA CDZ1 CDZ2 CDZ3 CDZ4 CDZ5 FZ FZ1 FZ3 GRZ1 GWAZ GWZ IN1Z IN3Z LDRZ LDRZ1 MUZ NRZ1 PCRZ PPRZ PUZ1 PUZ2 PUZ3 PUZ4 PUZ5 PUZ6 PUZ7 RCZ RCZ1 RCZ3 RDZ1 RDZ2 RLZ RLZ1 SUZ1 SUZ10 SUZ11 SUZ2 SUZ6 SUZ7 SUZ9 TZ UFZ UGZ UGZ1 UGZ10 UGZ11 UGZ2 UGZ3 UGZ4 UGZ6 UGZ7 UGZ9 PPTN hume
INZ1 PPRZ INCZ1 INCZ2 INCZ3 PED CONNECTIONS NEW ROAD CONNECTIONS
Bike networks hume
Strategic cycling corridor hume Principle bike network hume 633-653 lots hume city
OpenStreetMap
479
SCENARIO C | NEW NEIGHBOURHOOD PERSONAS/PROFILES ADDRESS: DWYER STREET, DONNYBROOK, HUME ABOUT: Car-Dependent neighbourhood so almost all errands require a car. Donnybrook Road is a one minute walk from the
Melbourne - Seymour Via Broadmeadows, the Shepparton - Melbourne Via Seymour and the Melbourne - Seymour Via Broadmeadows bus at the Donnybrook Railway Station (Donnybrook) stop.
480
1 WALKSCORE
27 TRANSIT SCORE
KEY ISSUES:
PROPOSAL:
NOT A WALKABLE NEIGHBOURHOOD
• INCLUDE RURAL RESIDENTIAL LOTS (RRZ) TO ALLOW FOR RESIDENTIAL ON MINIMUM 8 HECTARE LOTS. INCENTIVISE RESIDENTS TO PARTICIPATE IN COMMUNITY FRESH FOOD AND PRODUCE MARKETS ALONG THE GW ZONES
NOT MUCH DIVERSITY OR DENSITY OF AMENITY
• INSLUSIONARY ZONING (1, 2 AND 3) IN EXISTING PUAND EXISTING GRZ AND NRZ ZONES (ONES THAT ARE NOT CURRENTLY POPULATED).
RELATIVELY INACCESSIBLE PATHS (GRADIENTS)
LARGE UNDERUTILISED GREEN WEDGES AND URBAN GROWTH ZONES
CDZ (COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT ZONE) UNDERUTILISED AND SHOULD HAVE APLAN IN PLACE TO POPULATE
• CONNECT TO DONNYBROOK STATION THROUGH ENHANCED BUS ROUTES AND STOPS BASED ON EXISTING BUS ROUTES (525 DONNYBROOK STATION BUS). • PARK AND PUBLIC RECREATION ZONES, PUBLIC CONSERVATION AND RESOURCES ZONES IN GW AND UG ZONES TO ENHANCE SUSTAINABLE POWER SUPPLY (WIND FARMS, SOLAR, BIOGAS ETC.) AND ENCOURAGE LEARNING AND CLIMATE AWARENESS (THROUGH PCRZ). • WITH THE CORE PLANNING PROVISIONS (CPP) OF A UG (URBAN GROWTH) AND GW (GREEN WEDGE) ZONE, PROVIDE OPPORTUNITIES FOR TOURISM (NATIONAL PARKS) AND CONSERVATION. • ENHANCE BIKE PATH CONNECTIONS TO DONNYBROOK STATION
INADEQUATE AMENITY TO SERVICE THE 800M CATCHMENT
481
SCENARIO C | NEW NEIGHBOURHOOD ACTIVITY CENTRES_HUME_DWYER STREET,
SCENARIO C | NEW NEIGHBOURHOOD ACTIVITY CENTRES_HUME_DWYER STREET, DONNYBROOK_REZONING PROPOSAL
Donnybrook Existing Zones
Train Line TR_RAIL
Hume activity centres Major and metro activity centres Hume 393-740 lots in hume
Planning scheme zones Hume Planning Zones C1Z CA CDZ2 CDZ4 FZ1 GRZ1 IN1Z PCRZ PPRZ PUZ1 PUZ5 RCZ RCZ1 RCZ2 RCZ4 RDZ1 RLZ SUZ8 TZ UGZ UGZ1 UGZ4 UGZ5 UGZ8
Bike networks hume Strategic cycling corridor hume Principle bike network hume 633-653 lots hume city
OpenStreetMap
482
CTIVITY CENTRES_HUME_DWYER STREET, DONNYBROOK_REZONING PROPOSAL
Donnybrook Existing Zones
Train Line TR_RAIL Donnybrook Existing Zones
Train Line
Hume activity centres Major and metro activity centres Hume 393-740 lots in hume
TR_RAIL
Hume activity centres Major and metro activity centres Hume 393-740 lots in hume
Planning scheme zones Hume Planning Zones C1Z CA CDZ2 CDZ4 FZ1 GRZ1 IN1Z PCRZ PPRZ PUZ1 PUZ5 RCZ RCZ1 RCZ2 RCZ4 RDZ1 RLZ SUZ8 TZ UGZ UGZ1 UGZ4 UGZ5 UGZ8
Bike networks hume Strategic cycling corridor hume Principle bike network hume 633-653 lots hume city
OpenStreetMap
Planning scheme zones
MAJOR ACTIVITY CENTRE
Hume Planning Zones C1Z CA CDZ2 CDZ4
INZ1 PPRZ INCZ1 INCZ2 INCZ3 PED CONNECTIONS
FZ1 GRZ1 IN1Z PCRZ PPRZ PUZ1 PUZ5 RCZ RCZ1 RCZ2 RCZ4 RDZ1 RLZ SUZ8
NEW ROAD CONNECTIONS
TZ UGZ UGZ1
BUS CONNECTIONS
UGZ4 UGZ5 UGZ8
Bike networks hume Strategic cycling corridor hume Principle bike network hume 633-653 lots hume city
OpenStreetMap
483
SCENARIO C | NEW NEIGHBOURHOOD PERSONAS/PROFILES_GREATER DANDENONG_112 CARLTON RD, DANDENONG NT ADDRESS: 112 CARLTON ROAD, DANDENONG NORTH
0-65 APT WALKSCORE
484
TH
33 WALKSCORE
41 TRANSIT SCORE
KEY ISSUES:
PROPOSAL:
NOT MUCH DIVERSITY OF HOUSING
• NEW MAJOR ACTIVITY CENTRE COMBINING THE LOCAL AND LARGE LOCAL EXISTING ACTIVITY CENTRES
IMPERMEABLE HIGHWAYS AND LARGE ROADS DISCONNECTING AMENITY FROM RESIDENTIAL
NOT MUCH INTERACTION OF RESIDENTIAL WITH NEARBY CREEK (DANDNEONG CREEK)
URBAN FLOODWAY ZONES PREVENTING ENGAGEMENT FROM RESIDENTS WITH WETLANDS AND DANDENONG CREEK
• WETLANDS RENEWAL AND REINVIGORATION PROJECT ALONG THE UFZ (URBAN FLOODWAY ZONES). BUILDING MORE DUREABLE WETLANDS TO PREVENT FUTURE FLOODING AND ALLOW MORE AMENITY AND RESIDENTIAL TO BE BUILT AND ENGAGE WITH THE DANDENONG CREEK. • PUBLIC PARK AND RECREATION ZONES WITHIN LARGE EXPANSE. • PEDESTRIAN PRIORITY ACCESS ACROSS MAIN ROADS (TRAFFIC LIGHTS, LOWER SPEED LIMITS DUE TO NEW MAJOR ACTIVITY CENTRE) • CONNECT EXISTING BIKE PATHS TO DANDENONG CREEK TRAIL AS WELL AS THROUGHOUT THE MAJOR ACTIVITY CENTRE • PROVIDE INCLUSIONARY AMENITY WITHIN 10 MINUTE (20 MINUTE ROUND TRIP) CATCHMENTS TO ENSURE THOSE WITH MOBILITY IMPAIRMENTS MAY ENJOY THE BENEFITS OF NEIGHBOURHOOD AMENITY AND ACTIVITY (TO WORK AROUND THE SLOPED PATHS).
VERY SLOPED PATHS, DIFFICULT WITH REGARDS TO ACCESSIBILITY.
• WITHIN PUZ, APPLY INCLUSIONARY ZONING FOR RESIDENTIAL AND AMENITY. • ONCE WETLAND RENEWAL PROJECT HAS FINISHED, COMMENCE REZONING OF UFZ TO INCZ1, 2 AND 3 TO CREATE MORE HOUSING FOR LOWER SOCIO-ECONOMIC GROUPS.
485
SCENARIO C | NEW NEIGHBOURHOOD PERSONAS/PROFILES_112 CARLTON RD, DANDENONG NTH_REZONING Greater Dandenong Activity Centres Greater Dandenong Activity centre buffers copy Neighbourhood centre GD buffer 800 Large Local Shop Node GD 800 buffer Local Shop Node GD 800 buffer greater dandnenong 393-740 lots
Planning scheme zones Greater Dandenong Planning Zones C1Z C2Z GRZ1 MUZ NRZ1 PCRZ PPRZ PUZ1 PUZ2 PUZ3 PUZ7 RDZ1 RDZ2 UFZ GRZ3 RGZ1 RGZ2
OpenStreetMap
Potential new Major Activity Centre 112 Carlton Road Dandenong North Greater Dandenong - Existing Planning Zones and activity Centres
486
487
SCENARIO C | NEW NEIGHBOURHOOD PERSONAS/PROFILES_GREATER DANDENONG_KIRKHAM ROAD, DANDENONG ADDRESS: KIRKHAM ROAD, DANDENONG ABOUT: Kirkham Road has a Walk Score of 39 out of 100. This location is a Car-Dependent neighborhood so most errands require a
car. This location is in the Dandenong neighborhood in Melbourne. Nearby parks include Dandenong Park, Greaves Reserve and John Hemmings Memorial Park.
- WalkScore, 2020
80-100 APT WALKSCORE
488
48 WALKSCORE
43 TRANSIT SCORE
KEY ISSUES:
PROPOSAL:
VERY LARGE AREA OF INDUSTRIAL ZONES ON BOTH SIDES OF RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBOURHOOD
• COMREHENSIVE RESIDENTIAL ZONES TO BE REINVIGORATED AND PLANNED TO BE INCZ3 ZONES AND MIXED USE RESIDENTIAL ZONES. COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT WITHIN THESE ZONES.
18 MIN WALK FROM ST ALBANS TRAIN STATION HOWEVER UNSAFE WALKING AN INEFFICIENT WALKING PATH
LARGE ROADS INTERSECTING (TAYLORS ROAD AND KINGS ROAD) NOT PERMEABLE
• ALL INDUSTRIAL ZONES TO BE LINED WITH SHOPPING/RETAIL STRIPS (C1Z AND PUZ) TO ALLOW FOR RESIDENTIAL ENGAMENET AND BUFFERING OF INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS. • COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT ZONES TO ALSO INCLUDE MARKETS AND FRESH FOOD MARKETS FOR COMMUNITY AND TO ENCOURAGE FOR FOOD CHOICE. • BIKE PATHS ALONG DANDENONG CREEK. PEDESTRIAN PATH CONNECTIONS FROM RESIDENTIAL STREETS ACROSS CREEK TO OTHER SIDE OF CREEK. • PARKLAND AND OUTDOOR RECREATION ALONG DANDENONG CREEK.
LARGE SPECIAL USE ZONE (AMBIGUOUS WITH INTENTION OF THIS ZONE, SHOULD BE SPECIFIED BASED ON ADJACENT LAND ZONES)
• ADEQUATE AMENITY THROUGH SHOPPING STRIPS ON MAIN ROADS AND STREETS. ACCESSIBLE AND INCLUSIVE AMENITY AND SERVICES.
ADJACENT LAND ZONES PUZ3 (TRANSPORT). NRZ1 (2 MAX LOTS NOT TALLER THAN 2 STORY DWELLINGS) AND RDZ1 (LIMITATIONS TO KINGS ROAD UPDATES). THESE INFLUENCE THE SUZ2
INADEQUATE AMENITY TO SERVICE THE 800M CATCHMENT
489
SCENARIO C | NEW NEIGHBOURHOOD PERSONAS/PROFILES_112 CARLTON RD, DANDENONG NTH_REZONING Greater Dandenong Activity Centres Greater Dandenong Activity centre buffers copy Neighbourhood centre GD buffer 800 Large Local Shop Node GD 800 buffer Local Shop Node GD 800 buffer greater dandnenong 393-740 lots
Train Line TR_RAIL
Planning scheme zones Greater Dandenong Planning Zones C1Z C2Z CDZ1 CDZ2 FZ GRZ1 IN1Z IN3Z MUZ NRZ1 PPRZ PUZ1 PUZ2 PUZ4 PUZ5 PUZ6 RDZ1 RDZ2 UFZ GRZ2 GRZ3 RGZ1 RGZ2
OpenStreetMap
Kirkham Road Dandenong Greater Dandenong Potential New Major Activity Centre - Existing Zoning and Activity Centres
490
Greater
Greater Da
L
Great
Kirkham Dand 491 Activity C
CURRENT OPTIMAL YIELDS I BRIMBANK ZONING AND LOTS_
4,520
633-653m2 Lots
15
dwellings / lot
67,800
633-653m2 Lots 492
493
CURRENT OPTIMAL YIELDS I DANDENONG ZONING AND LOTS_
2,216
633-653m2 Lots
15
dwellings / lot
33,240
633-653m2 Lots 494
495
CURRENT OPTIMAL YIELDS I HUME CITY ZONING AND LOTS_
5,750
633-653m2 Lots
15
dwellings / lot
82,250
633-653m2 Lots 496
497
ONLINE SURVEY | CREATING A NEW TERMINOLOGY FOR HOUSING
ONLINE SURVEY | CREATING A NEW TERMINOLOGY FOR HOUSING_
498
SOCIAL HOUSING | TYPOLOGIES_ SOCIAL HOUSING | TYPOLOGIES SOCIAL HOUSING | TYPOLOGIES Tower
3 Storey
6 Flat Pack
Tower
3 Storey
6 Flat Pack
TOWER
157 Melrose St North Melbourne, Victoria
157 Melrose St North Melbourne, Victoria
7636 7636
157 Melrose St North Melbourne, Victoria
3 STOREY
22-26 Barkly St Brunswick East, Victoria
22-26 Barkly St Brunswick East, Victoria
7580 7580
22-26 Barkly St Brunswick East, Victoria
6 PACK FLATS
264 Gower St Preston, Victoria
264 Gower St Preston, Victoria
30326 30326 264 Gower St Preston, Victoria
499
SOCIAL HOUSING | TYPOLOGIES & BEDROOMS_ SOCIAL HOUSING | TYPOLOGIES AND BEDROOMS Tower TOWER
amount of 20690
1 500
in vic
3 Storey 3 STOREY
amount of
2
22967 in vic
PackFLATS Flats 66 PACK
amount of
3
30326 in vic
SOCIAL HOUSING | BEDROOMS 4+
amount of
4
3443 in vic
amount of
5
430 in vic
amount of
6
211 in vic
An necessity for diverse uses but not a need for Victoria 501
NATSEM | INDIGENOUS INDICATORS_
Urban Extent 2015 Study LGAs
0
502
387
527
Wurundjeri Wadawurrung
BRIMBANK
808
Wurundjeri Bunurong
DANDENONG
1,482
Wurundjeri
HUME 503
NATSEM | MIGRATION RATE_
Urban Extent 2015 Study LGAs
0%
504
83.78%
50.67% BRIMBANK
60.96% DANDENONG
35.96% HUME 505
NATSEM | EMPLOYMENT RATE_
Urban Extent 2015 Study LGAs
0%
506
100%
64.95% BRIMBANK
62.74% DANDENONG
66.37% HUME 507
NATSEM | UNEMPLOYMENT RATE_
Urban Extent 2015 Study LGAs
0%
508
19.69%
10.60% BRIMBANK
10.22% DANDENONG
8.61% HUME 509
NATSEM | EQUIVALISED MEDIAN HOUSEHOLD INCOME_
Urban Extent 2015 Study LGAs
$520
510
$1,491
$708.08 per week
BRIMBANK
$682.25 per week
DANDENONG
$719.73
per week
HUME 511
SEIFA | INDEX OF ECONOMIC RESOURCES_
Urban Extent 2015 Study LGAs
732
512
1,143
962 BRIMBANK
936 DANDENONG
1000 HUME 513
SEIFA | INDEX OF EDUCATION & OCCUPATION_
Urban Extent 2015 Study LGAs
830
514
1,204
920 BRIMBANK
908 DANDENONG
940 HUME 515
SEIFA | INDEX OF RELATIVE SOCIO-ECONOMIC DISADVANTAGE_
Urban Extent 2015 Study LGAs
43
516
2,151
934 BRIMBANK
917 DANDENONG
957 HUME 517
ACCESSIBILITY | HEAT VULNERABILITY INDEX_
HEAT EXPOSURE
UHI | Vegetation | Roads_
SENSITIVITY TO HEAT
Population Density | Elderly | Very Young | Persons Need Care_
ADAPTIVE CAPABILITY SEIFA IRSD | SEIFA IEO_
Urban Extent 2015 Study LGAs
1
518
5
519
POPULATION DENSITY_
0
520
434,927
521
NEXT STEPS_
522
1
Select a scenario or hybrid scenarios to explore further.
2
Conduct an in-depth yield study of how much social housing can be implemented within our selected 20-minute neighbourhood scenario.
3
Tangibility/ feasibility studies. - Timeline - Cost - Can we incentivise private industry to participate?
4
Develop a micro-urban conceptual plan for implementing our approach.
5
Assess the replicability of the micro-urban plan.
6
Develop social housing architectural solution to fit within our neighbourhood scenario
7
Conduct an assessment of outcomes, what population will we be able to cater to, how much will our plan have increased walkability, how has our plan delivered on social housing requirements for 2036?
523
524
PROJECT DEFINITION_ After Mid Semester, Team 4 revised what our project will investigate within the second half of the semester, in order to respond to the feedback we received from Mid Semester and in order to obtain more tangible design outcomes. We decided that out of the 3 LGAs we looked at for Mid Semester, the LGA we wanted to investigate further was Brimbank, for the reasons listed on pages 528-531. We also came up with our proposal goal of having every 1 in 3 dwellings within Melbourne to be Social Housing - however, we also decided that we wanted to rebrand Social Housing to LiveAble Housing in order to disassociate the almost taboo stigma that is associated currently with Social Housing. The concept of 1 in 3 dwellings came from several research findings including that or National Shelter’s recommendations for inclusionary zoning:
National Shelter recommends that the Commonwealth encourages and provide incentives to State and Territory governments to include inclusionary zoning provisions in planning legislation, mandating 30% affordable housing requirements in all new developments, with a range of complementary measures.
525
MID SEMESTER FEEDBACK_ • Pick scenario with greatest social housing yield • Not feasible to move Brimbank tip • Make revised calculation of number of people needing social housing post COVID • Further explore inclusionary zoning strategy • Investigate strategies for how you can get the greatest social housing yield • Can we create a new typology for social housing that create the most yield? • Explore precedents in developing social housing design • How can social housing be sprinkled proportionally throughout neighbourhoods?
526
REVISED RESEARCH QUESTION_ How might we develop an AFFORDABLE, SUSTAINABLE AND INCLUSIVE solution that celebrates the attractive and accessible mixed-use amenity of REVITALISED ACTIVITY CENTRES across the CITY OF BRIMBANK whilst promoting ACTIVE AND SOCIAL LIFESTYLES?
527
WHY BRIMBANK_
✔ BRIMBANK STRATEGY | Clear 20-minute neighbourhood roadmap outlined POTENTIAL | clusters of under-utilised res and commercial zones within proximity to PPTN Major activity centres have potential for connection SOCIAL HOUSING | requires the greatest attention to boost social housing of the 3 LGA’s CONNECTION | broken connection to be resolved along rail/ industrial corridors
528
✘
✘
DANDENONG
HUME
DATA AVAILABILITY | far less information
ADOPTABILITY | Hume is currently invested in
available on Danadenong as it is a relatively new
a greenfield’s housing strategy which rejects the
LGA, meaning research will be a lot more rigorous/
20-minute walkable city principles.
time consuming. SOCIAL HOUSING | currently has the most social housing stock of the 3 LGA’s
529
WHICH SCENARIO DID WE CHOOSE TO EXPLORE_
Urban Strategy
COMPACT
530
+
Social Housing
CORRIDOR
+
LEVIATHAN
+
VILLAGE
WHY BRIMBANK? • Brimbank has a clear roadmap to 20 minute neighbourhoods • Brimbank has a lot of residential zones and small commercial zones that remain underutilized and run along existing PPTN • Brimbank has Major Activity Centres that are not well connected • Brimbank has large Industrial zones and large arterial roads that break up connection • Hume already has a lot of social housing • Brimbank requires more social housing to meet demand in future (more of a siginificant jump from what is existing to what needs to be) • Greater Dandenong has minimal information online; would require more extensive analysis...this may be what we include to show replicability across LGAs, but due to available data we will be benchmarking and proposing new planning schemes and provisions, social housing and an enhanced 20 minute neighbourhood LGA roadmap for Brimbank
531
BUSINESS MODEL INVESTIGATION_ “Everyone living in social housing pays rent. Your rent will not be more than 25 per cent of your total household income. Income includes wages and payments from Centrelink and the Department of Veterans’ Affairs” - DHHS, 2020 Vienna’s “limited profit model”
• “Private developers who collaborate with the city government to build affordable housing must allow the city to rent half of the new apartments to lower-income residents; the developer generally leases the remaining units to moderate-income residents”. • “Right to Buy legislation” passed in Austria in the 1990’s • Contributes to social integration of different levels of society. • Red Energy/ PTV operate within a similar business model in Australia.
532
NEXT STEPS_ MACRO URBAN |
Developing a transport strategy to support and connect our Brimbank activity centres with broader Melbourne.
MESO URBAN |
Further identification pin-pointing where activity centre and activity centre growth is required in Brimbank.
MICRO URBAN |
Development of an affordable housing outcome that fits within the competition requirements, 20-minute neighbourhood approach and addresses the social housing waitlist in Melbourne.
SUPPORTING RESEARCH |
Business model investigation to explore the feasibility of our approach. Social housing precedents research
533
534
SUSTAINABLE MOBILITY ENVIRONMENTS_ In week 8, we were visited by special Guest Lecturer Michael Trudgeon come in who is the Director of VEIL (Victorian Eco-Innovation Lab). As part of this lecture we looked into Sustainable Mobility Environmental techniques and namely the human-scale social dynamic conundrums that come from urban spaces such as garages, culs-de-sac and sidewalks. From this, Team 4 looked at the arrangements of different social housing typologies around the world, how successful or unsustainable they are. From these precedents we took great inspiration to the social dynamic outcomes that came from Alt-Erlaa in Vienna - the afforability, arrangement, amenity and sustainability of this typology was definitely something that we were aspiring to.
535
PRECEDENTS | TRELLICK TOWER_ • Located in Notting Hill, London • Constructed 1968-1972 in Brutalist style • 31 stories (91m high) • Design consists of a residential tower and services tower. • 9 different floor plan layouts ranging from 2-5 bedroom • 2000+ residents • Balcony’s are S/W facing • Range of communal spaces/ amenity on street level including shops, a laundry, a kinder and senior centre • apartments are spacious in size, but poor maintenance and lack of security saw the tower become an unsafe place to live. The service tower became the place to avoid as a place for crime and rough-sleepers • To fix this, a residents association was fromed in the 80’s who added CCTV, as well as a concierge service.
536
• Currently Grad 2 listed “the tower is undergoing £7.6 million refurbishment works which began in 2017” • Connection to service tower is at every third floor • Flats were for the first year heated with an oil system, until the oil crisis on 1973. • Flats are now heated by electric heating. • Trellick Tower is included in the “right to buy” social housing system • In 2017 there was a fire in the top two floors that did not spread because of the concrete construction.
537
PRECEDENTS_
Brunswick Centre | London
538
Sirius Building | Sydney
Ozanam House | Melbourne
PRECEDENTS | 8 HOUSE COPENHAGEN_ • Completed in 2010 • Named 8 House, because of figure of 8 plan • dwellings, shops, offices and a kinder are connected by a series of walkways and a central courtyard • also includes a bike path up to the 10th floor and green field • Elevated walkways contribute to social space being distributed evenly, creating a pleasant neighbourly environment. • 3 dwelling types for diversity of residents across 476 unit dwellings • mixed use with commercial at the bottom • communal passage is 10m w • concrete and steel frame construction
539
PRECEDENTS | ALT-ERLAA VIENNA_
• Constructed between 1973-1986 • approx 10km S/W of Vienna’s city centre • includes 3172 dwellings for 10 000+ residents • 27 stories high (70 metres) • First twelve sotries have deep soil planting to integrate the facade • 35 different floor plans to meet a diversity of needs • Alt-erlaa has become a satellite town of Vienna • You can live here for only 10% of your income • maximum yearly income of $53,225 after tax to be eligible • medium income of residents of $31, 500 p/a. • “is aimed at both people with low incomes and “a broad middle class” • “On average, tenants in Vienna spend 27 percent of their income on rent.” • Average rent paid by those in government subsidised housing is $670 AUD p/m (2019) • Average rent paid by others is $850 AUD p/m (2019)
540
Features |
• Young people in Vienna want to become housing association
• Rooftop swimming pool/ indoor swimming pool
tenants instead of owning their own home
• tennis court/ fitness centre/ sauna
• Towers work on a “limited profit model”
• car sharing
• “The Austrian Federation of Limited-Profit Housing Associations
• private garden’s for ground floor dwellings
(GBV) functions as compulsory audit organization for its members
• Adult education centre
as well as interest representation body”.
• 2,3 + 4 Bedroom dwellings.
• Another example of social housing in Vienna is “Autofreie
• 65% have 3 bedrooms
Mustersiedlung” where the residents of 244 dwellings have
• each balcony has garden planting/ spacious are
a contract not to own a car. The free space is then used for
for being outside
recreational/ communal spaces like a gym, sauna, bike repair, car sharing and youth centre. This concept originated in Breman, Germany. • Pupularity comes from housing security - residents are never required to move out. • New social housing cities are often established in former industrial neighbourhoods • the site is masterplanned with a mixture of apartment buildings serving every class all with access to the necessary local amenity’s
541
PRECEDENTS | ALEXANDRA ROAD PARK, LONDON_ • Designed in the 70’s, constructed in 1972-1979 • Located in Camden, London • Includes 520 dwellings across 8 floors each with private terrace • Dwelling types range from 1-4 bedroom • Includes amenities: shops, workshops, a community centre, schools and a public park. • Was a contrast/ breath of fresh air to the brutalist tower social housing being constructed at the time • Design was not originally met with positivity by local council, due to it being lower density than the norm • Decaying victorian mansions were originally located on the site • Each home has a garden • pedestrian redbrick street is 350m long • Rear facade is on West Coast rail line - staggered facade aims to provide noise buffer • Construction failures include the concrete trapping the heat and making the apartments too hot • was grad 2 listed in 1993
542
543
544
SCALAR THINKING_ As our LiveAble Housing proposal was progressing, we decided that it was important to work out where this proposal has come from and how we think it is going to come to fruition, so we decided to draft up these elements of scalar thinking. We also had several discussions about the strategy we as a group were going to take in order to get a tangible outcome from our proposal, and after several SWOT analysis discussions, as well as drop-in discussions with Ian, Team 4 came to the conclusion that our strategy for 20-minute neighbourhoods was to:
Only build new social housing in existing 20-min neighbourhoods, and divest the sector of any dwellings that are in car-dependent neighbourhoods. This would dramatically increase the gross population density in existing 20-min neighbourhoods, and therefore the overall proportion of Melbourne’s population living in 20-min neighbourhoods. The amenity of these neighbourhoods would improve, due to all the new, sustainable, well-designed dwellings and the increase in services to meet their needs. We believe through the success of this pilot strategy there is potential to refine these interventions to places based on a context to context situation, however, from a strategic planning point of view this would create the most feasible and replicable 20-minute neighbourhood model across Melbourne so as to implement our LiveAble Housing interventions.
545
ROAD MAP_
546
2025
2030
2035
2040
GREATER MELBOURNE
2042
2050 547
THOUGHT PROCESS_ IDENTIFIED LGAS
OUTLINE OF CRITERIA FOR SELECTION
[Type 2 Diabetes, Low SES, PPTN, Activity Centres, Social Housing Demand]
SELECTED CASE STUDY LGA
WHY SELECTED?
Existing Activity Centre Stragedy Existing Strategy for Housing Diversity Funding to Support Plan Melbourne 20 Minute Neighbourhood No greenfields left Infill Development Focus Outlines for Rezoning for more Housing Diversity
548
IDENTIFYING EXISTING ACS
WHY FOCUSING ON EXISTING ACS
Because in the planning scheme they outline how there should be more development & Housing within ACs, & that new ACs should be explored. Also in pilot program in Sunshine West, they chose this location due to its existing ACs & existing residential density. Also ACs are well connected to the PPTN & if not, they should be!
CREATING NEW ACS
WHY WE SELECTED NEW LOCATIONS
Due to gaps identified between existing AC Due to residential densities that were not too close to adequate amenity Due to existing PPTN that was under-utilising potential ACs
EXISTING & NEW PPTN
Looking at existing pptn. Expanding PPTN to meet the new proposed acs and connect them to each other and to new acs. This is because we want people from each 20 minute neighbourhood (AC) to be able to connect to others in this 20 min AC neighbourhood network affordable amenity.
IDENTIFYING EXISTING RENTAL PROPERTIES WITHIN NEW & EXISTING ACS
WHY?
Existing rentals are not affordable, & social housing is on a rentable business model. We can purchase lots with existing rentals & place on them (through amalgemating adjacent lots) new social housing model. Existing tenants get access to these new dwellings. Incentives for land lords to sell investment properties to the government & have access to social housing amenity.
CONVERT 30% OF THESE EXISTING LOTS INTO SOCIAL HOUSING
WHY?
To ensure we not only achieve, but exceed the supply for the projected demand for social housiing within Brimbank & within our social housing model. Tenants could wither live in these dwellings for the rest of their lifetime, or after 40 years or so move out to permanent/ single dwellings for the remainder of their lives. It creates a sustainable housing cycle - A closed-loop housing system. Tenants may also move to a neighbouring 20 min neighbourhood ACs if they choose. They can be assure that they will receive the same quality of life & housing & affordability in new neighbourhood.
549
SCALAR THINKING_
>
MACRO
LGAs & Greater Melbourne transport network
connecting neighbourhoods
550
Introduction of mixed use public realm spaces i.e. hybrid typologies such as hospitals, zoos, museum, art galleries
>
MESO
Suburb / Neighbourhood / Precinct / Activity Centre
percentage of social housing within 20 minute neighbourhoods
Mixed-Use Amenity typologies Activity Centres / dispursal of building typologies
MICRO
Building Typologies
Hybrid Typologies
Social Housing / Small Scale Amenities
551
552
ARCHITECTURE IN CONTEXT_ In week 10, we were tasked with an “in-class� study exercise for those of us wanting to enter the FHSC. This task asked us to look at different site amalgamations as a quick testing exercise. At this time, I had been looking into what potential grasshopper plugins were available for us to potentially use for studio, as I had also been taking another unit that used Grasshopper as one of its main programs - from this I found a couple of different plugins that I tested out before deciding that due to our group coming from a social approach to our LiveAble housing this was not the right time to use these plugins. Team 4 had also come up with a microscale approach that we wanted to use to our design outcome for bothe the FHSC and studio. From these outcomes, and as part of this Architecture in Context, I played with both the amalgamation of lots that we could use and the composition of the dwellings on those lots to test the different circulation and edge conditions that can come from different forms.
553
MICRO SCALE APPROACH_
554
555
SOCIAL HOUSING TYPOLOGIES | ARCHITECTURAL MASSING STUDIES_
556
557
SOCIAL HOUSING TYPOLOGIES | SITE AMALGAMATION STUDIES_
2_3_4 Lot Building Envelopes
558
Culs de Sac Amalgamations
559
SOCIAL HOUSING TYPOLOGIES | GROUND FLOOR DWELLING+SITE AMALGAMATION STUDIES_
560
561
SOCIAL HOUSING TYPOLOGIES | INTERNAL CIRCULATION MOOD BOARD_ Universal Design Principles_ Equitable use: the design is useful & relevant to a wide group of end-users Flexibility in use: the design accommodates a wide range of individual preferences & abilities Simple and intuitive use: the design is easy to understand regardless of the knowledge, experience, language skills or concentration level of the end-user Perceptive information: the design communicates information effectively to the user regardless of the ambient condition or the sensory abilities of the end-user Tolerance for error: the design minimizes the hazards and adverse consequences of unintended actions by the end-user Low physical effort: the design can be used easily, efficiently, & comfortably with a minimum of fatigue Size and space: the size and space for approach, reach, manipulation, & use should be appropriate regardless of the body size, posture, or mobility of the end-user
Project : 26 Apartments in Montreuil_Social Housing Architect : Benjamin Fleury
562
CAN WE IMPLEMENT THE SAME PATH CIRCULATION INTO THE PUBLIC REALM ?
Project : Kingborough Village_Woolstore Architect : DNA Architects
Project : Viettel Academy Educational Center Architect : VTN Architects
563
564
SPACE, FORM & USE AT MULTIPLE SCALES_ Throughout our design process we decided to create several surveys as a conscious effort to get a community engagement understanding about social housing that we would not otherwise get. I also looked further at what amenity makes up a 20-minute neighbourhood and what amenities have more of 40-minute city element to them; what types of amenity we will be implementing to our 20-minute neighbourhoods, if they do not already have these amenities provided. Parallel to these micro and meso scale investigations, we refined exactly what elements we are using in order to find our 20-minute neighbourhoods, as well as the strategy that we planned on taking from a strategic, statutory and spatial approach.
565
STRATEGY_
ACTIVITY CENTRES Major & Neighbourhood
566
RESIDENTIAL ZONES
GRZ + MUZ + LDRZ + NRZ + RGZ
INCLUSIONARY ZONES 1/3 = MIZ > Live-Able Housing
LIVEABILITY ELEMENTS_
SNAMUTS
PPRZ
PRIMARY SCHOOLS
PPTN
ACTIVITY CENTRES
567
VEHICLE BARRIERS/CONNECTIONS_
PREFERRED VEHICLE TRAFFIC ROUTES
568
569
POTENTIAL AMENITIES_ 20 Minute Neighbourhoods • Library
• Hospital
• Medical Centre
• Museum
• Community Centre
• Town Hall
• Place of Worship • Event Venue • Childcares
• Kindergartens • Police Station
• Specialist Medical Centre • Charities • Studios • ATM
• Post Office • Bus Stops
• Railway Station • Open Space
570
40 Minute Cities
• Courthouse • Prison
• Wildlife Centre
• Government Buildings • Fire Station? • Cinema • Offices • Bank
• University
SNAMUTS_ We were only able to get SNAMUTS dataset from 2016, however, besides Sunshine & some parts of Darebin there doesn’t seem
to be much change in the Composite Accessibility Index:
So in areas where there isn’t an above average SNAMUTS Composite Accessibility Index we will be using a walkscore of 70+.
571
MICRO SCALE INTERVENTIONS_
572
573
574
PLANNING LAW, STRATEGIC & STATUTORY PLANNING_ In week 11, we had a cross-unit session with Guest Lecturer Stephen Glackin from our Planning Law, Strategic & Statutory Planning Unit. In this unit, Team 4’s members Paris Triantis, Arsen Sarkisian and myself, have been working in collaboration with our studio proposals on a Planning Report in order to investigate what needs to happen from an urban planning perspective in order for our proposal to be successful. As part of this in-class session, Paris, Arsen and myself pitched what our plans for both our Planning Report and our 20-minute neighbourhood LiveAble Places studio proposal was. The feedback we received allowed us to revise how we are going to tackle the zoning and overlays of our 20-minute neighbourhoods by informing as that instead of propositioning the introduction of mandatory inclusionary zoning that we had initially intended to do, we should look re-zoning our 20-minute neighbourhoods to already existing zones and then implementing provisions such as Community Land Trusts to our neighbourhoods. This session also allowed us to zoom in even further to one precinct of our case study Deer Park 20-minute neighbourhood that we were investigating; a precinct that we named Cairnlea Park Precinct [as it falls within the suburbs of Cairnlea and Deer Park].
575
576
577
BEFORE | PLANNING SCHEME OVERLAYS_
DCPO DPO EAO ESO_Schedule 4
ESO_Schedule 6 HO LSIO SBO
578
579
580
581
BEFORE | PLANNING SCHEME ZONES_
Commercial 1 Zone General Residential Zone Neighbourhood Residential Zone
Public Conservation & Resource Public Park & Recreation Zone Public Use Zone_Education
Public Use Zone_Service & Utility
582
583
DEER PARK | 3D CASE STUDY MODEL & LOTS_ » Deer Park 20 Minute Neighbourhood of a broader Brimbank Contextual Model I created_
584
585
AERIAL_
Cairnlea Park Precinct
586
587
YEAR BUILT_
1970s 1980s 1990s 2000s 2010s
588
589
BUILDING HEIGHTS_
3m = 180 dwgs 4m = 169 dwgs 5m = 72 dwgs 6m = 84 dwgs 7m = 26 dwgs 8m = 1 dwgs
590
591
FOOTPATHS_
Footpaths
592
593
BICYCLE NETWORK_
On Road Off Road
594
595
CONTAMINATED LAND_
Not Contaminated Contaminated
596
597
598
FUTURE HOMES STUDENT COMPETITION_ In the week beginning 9th November 2020, myself and the rest of Team 4 [Megan Murray, Arsen Sarkisian and Paris Triantis] entered our LiveAble Housing proposal into the FHSC. The following pages show a snippet of what our competition entry looked like - with the rest of the competition entry in th Final Presentation chapter. This entry included a number of micro scale elements that we investigated including materiality, fixture and fittings that had a Green Star Rating, WERS Star Rating, GreenTag certificate and/or Australian Made. We proposed using copper fixtures as they are anti-microbial, which is inline with sanitation trends that have comeabout as a response to the Covid-19 pandemic. Although we wish that we were able to enter more of our multiscalar proposition into the competition, we are very pleased and proud of our competition entry. This pride has only been heightened by a panellist at our final studio presentation asking whether we had entered the FHSC as this exactly the kind of project that the competition looks for.
599
PRECINCT ITERATIONS
BRIEF
LiveAble Housing is a project that has manifested from an in depth analysis into Victoria’s shortfall in quality, affordable housing within 20-minute neighbourhoods. LiveAble Housing is something that should be a choice to not only those who meet the requirements but to anyone who wants to lead a liveable lifestyle within a 20 minute neighbourhood & 40 minute city. A lifestyle that is for the long-term, and is accessible, inclusive, & sustainable with a wide diversity of people, places, & amenities - all within walking distance. Thus, our goal is to have every 1 in 3 dwellings to be some sort of LiveAble Housing. Cairnlea Park LiveAble Development Strategy & Precinct Proposal is our strategic, statutory & spatial response to our LiveAble Housing design proposal, in which we have been investigating high amenity, affordable, medium density housing alternatives to enhance Melbourne’s 20-minute neighbourhood goals. Our built form is a direct response to both celebrating the successful components of the six-pack-flat with contemporary treatment, and to challenging urban sprawl of the quarter acre block by providing a series of modular apartment layouts for families of all sizes. For cost and efficiency in delivery a greater density of social housing stock to Melbourne, each apartment is prefabricated locally and then transported to site, meaning that apartments can be individually configured to suit a range of different site contexts and compositions. We have created this LiveAble Housing Cairnlea Park precinct, as we believe that this site typifies our goal to promote greater densification of Melbourne’s middlering suburbs with enhanced access to amenity, through focussing specifically on permeability and connection. As a direct response to the brief, we have sought to challenge the notion of reducing the stigma surrounding affordable [social] housing through a design that seeks to foster community and serendipitous social interactions between residents at every level. To achieve this, our apartment sizes are configured more spaciously than the minimum standards for apartment design inform.
600
PUBLIC REALM ITERATIONS
ARCHITECTURAL ITERATIONS
601
MATERIALS INTERNAL / EXTERNAL WALLS
WALLS & CEILING
AUSTRAL PRECAST PANEL BRICK
GTEK FIRE & WET AREA PLASTERBOARD
200MM DOUBLE WALL
10MM THICKNESS
AGED RED 4.5 NABHERS | 5 GCBA
602
GECA CERT.
WALLS & CEILING
INSULATION
FLOORS/TILES
KINGSPAN GREENGUARD GG700
BOTTEGA CALIZA SLIP RESISTANT
80MM THICKNESS
CONCRETE LOOK
600 MAX CENTRES
XPS
1200X600MM TILE
GBCA STAR SCHEME
0 ODP | LOW GWP
GREENRATE LEVEL A
STUDCO STEEL STUD WALL & CEILING
FLOORS
FLOORS
WINDOWS
DOORS
ENTRANCE DOORS
ROOFING
BCG POLISHED CONCRETE
AFFINITY POLYFLOR PUR FINISH
PVC DOUBLE-GLAZED WINDOWS
PVC DOUBLE-GLAZED DOORS
SCS UPVC 88PLUS DOORS
BIO SOLAR GREEN ROOF
7MM AGGREGATE
STRAIGHT LAID PLANK
TILT & TURN/STACKER
TILT & TURN/STACKER
MODEL 6860
WATER RETENTION
C219
CHAMPAGNE OAK 9785
WHITE
WHITE
CREMEWEISS
400MM THICK SOIL
3 STAR GCBA
GREEN TAG CERT.
WERS STAR RATED
WERS STAR RATED
WERS STAR RATED
LOW UHI
603
FIXTURES BATHROOM
INTERNAL LIGHTING
604
LIGHTING
LIGHTING
DOOR HANDLES
TOILET
BRIGHT GREEN P900 CURVE
BRIGHT GREEN D900.SHX
BRIGHT GREEN D2000-CR
FURNIPART HANDLE COMMON
CAROMA CARE 800 CLEANFLUSH
LED PENDANT LIGHT
LED SPOTLIGHT
LED DOWNLIGHT
ANTIMICROBIAL
MEETS AS1428.1
WHITE
WHITE
WHITE
ANTIQUE COPPER
WHITE
16.5W | 27° BEAM ∠
16.5W | 27° BEAM ∠
30W | 55° BEAM ∠
ACCESSIBLE D HANDLE
WELS 4 STAR RATED
TAPS
BASIN
TOILET ROLL HOLDER
VODA SINK MIXER CURVED
LIANO NEXUS INSET BASIN
VODA TOILET ROLL HOLDER
ANTIMICROBIAL
FITTING WASTE PLUG
BRUSHED COPPER WELS 4 STAR RATED
TOWEL RAIL
SHOWER SET
SHOWER SCREEN
VODA TOWEL RAIL DOUBLE 900MM
VODA TWIN RAIL SHOWER
CREATIVE GLASS FRAMELESS FIXED
ANTIMICROBIAL
ANTIMICROBIAL
WITH OVERHEAD
2100 H X 1100 W
WHITE
BRUSHED COPPER
BRUSHED COPPER
BRUSHED COPPER
POLISHED CHROME
5L CAPACITY
AUSTRALIAN MADE
AUSTRALIAN MADE
WELS 3 STAR RATED
10MM A/S THICKNESS
605
FINISHES BATHROOM [CONT.] BATH TUB
606
KITCHEN MIRRORS
TAPS
INTERNAL SINK
PAINT
LIANO 1525 FREESTANDING BATH
TALL MIRRORED CABINET
VODA SINK MIXER PULL OUT
LUNA DOUBLE BOWL O/M & U/M
WATTYL I.D. ANTIQUE WHITE USA
1525X 700X440MM
WALL MOUNTED
ANTIMICROBIAL
SINGLE BY–PASS KIT
FULL / SEMI GLOSS /
WHITE
5MM THICKNESS
BRUSHED COPPER
POLISHED CHROME
FLAT FINISH
305L CAPACITY
900 X 1100 X 150MM
WELS 5 STAR RATED
SINGLE & DOUBLE
1 STAR GCBA
BATHROOM CABINETRY
BLINDS
VANITIES
KITCHEN CABINETRY
BENCHTOPS
SPLASHBACKS
AUSTRAL MARINE AAA PLYWOOD
HELIOSCREEN INTERNAL BLACKOUT
LAMINEX ESSASTONE ENGINEERED STONE
LAMINEX DECORATED MDF
DURANGO BONE CERAMIC
LAMINEX ESSASTONE ENGINEERED STONE
AS/NZS 2272
HELIOGREEN CALAIS
20MM THICKNESS
WALLS | SEMI GLOSS
RECTIFIED EDGE
20MM THICKNESS
19MM THICKNESS
SILVER LF & BO
CAOLINO MATT
RAW BIRCHPLY
CUSTOM FIT
WHITE CONCRETE
2 POINT GBCA
1 STAR GCBA
GBCA STAR SCHEME
GREENRATE LEVEL A
GREENRATE LEVEL A
GBCA STAR SCHEME
607
CHALLENGING THE PROVISIONS
In order to allow for Plan Melbourne’s 20-minute neighbourhoods strategy to come to fruition amendments to the current Brimbank City Council Planning Scheme [2020] need to be made so as to accommodate the urban infrastructure necessary. These amendments have come out of research done in order to identify Greater Melbourne’s existing 20-minute neighbourhoods as according to Caroline Whitzman’s liveability indicators:
“live in appropriate housing, within walking, cycling or rapid and reliable public transport distance to employment and education, social and health services, healthy food, and good quality public openspace” [Whitzman, C. et al, 2012]
608
609
CONCEPTUAL MASTERPLAN SITE IN CONTEXT
610
SITE PLAN PINEWOOD CRESCENT - BLACKWOOD COURT
611
GROUND FLOOR PLAN 4-LOT AMALGAMATION 1:200 @A2
612
FIRST FLOOR PLAN 4-LOT AMALGAMATION 1:200 @A2
SECOND FLOOR PLAN 4-LOT AMALGAMATION 1:200@A2
613
ROOF PLAN RENDERED PERSPECTIVE
614
MARKETPLACE SNAPSHOTS OF LIFE
SUNDAY AFTERNOON SNAPSHOTS OF LIFE
PERMACULTURE SNAPSHOTS OF LIFE
RESIDENT COURTYARD SNAPSHOTS OF LIFE
615
NORTH ELEVATION 1:125 @ A2
616
EAST ELEVATION 1:75 @ A2
617
SECTION A | EAST-WEST SECTION SOUTH FACING
SECTION B | EAST-WEST SECTION NORTH FACING
SECTION C | NORTH-SOUTH SECTION WEST FACING
618
2 BEDROOM APARTMENT GROUND - FIRST FLOOR
3 BEDROOM APARTMENT GROUND - FIRST FLOOR
GROSS FLOOR AREA: 96M2
GROSS FLOOR AREA: 121M2
INTERNAL AREA: 82M2
INTERNAL AREA: 110M2
EXTERNAL AREA: 14M2
EXTERNAL AREA: 11M2
619
620
1 BEDROOM APARTMENT SECOND FLOOR
4 BEDROOM APARTMENT GROUND - SECOND FLOOR
GROSS FLOOR AREA: 48M2
GROSS FLOOR AREA: 120M2
INTERNAL AREA: 40M2
INTERNAL AREA: 111M2
EXTERNAL AREA: 8M2
EXTERNAL AREA: 9M2
STUDIO APARTMENT SECOND FLOOR
5 BEDROOM APARTMENT GROUND - FIRST FLOOR
GROSS FLOOR AREA: 39M2
GROSS FLOOR AREA: 154M2
INTERNAL AREA: 29M2
INTERNAL AREA: 138M2
EXTERNAL AREA: 10M2
EXTERNAL AREA: 16M2
621
INTERNAL PERSPECTIVE COMFORTABLE CENTRAL LIVING SPACE
622
623
624
FINAL PRESENTATION_ The following pages is Team 4’s Final Presentation for Design Research Studio B / C_Zoomburbia 2.0!. Our project is called LiveAble Places. For our Final Presentation, we took a very collaborative approach to our LiveAble Places proposal as we believe this created the best outcomes. It also meant that all of us had some kind of input into every element of our project from LiveAble Urbanity and LiveAble Environments, to LiveAble Movements and LiveAble Housing. Team 4 now has a strong interest in seeing LiveAble Housing and the issue of social housing stock within Metropolitan Melbourne. We have a good understanding of what urban planning interventions need to happen in order for our proposal to come to fruition, and also areas such as how our proposal would spatially look in other contexts of Melbourne that we are keen to continue investigating. I have really enjoyed this semester and the topic we investigated - I am thankful for the effort and motivation my fellow Team 4 members have given to our proposal and have really gained a lot from having Dr. Ian Woodcock as Unit Convenor to help guide us through this design process.
625
INCLUSIVE
SUSTAINABLE
LIVEABLE PLACES AFFORDABLE
626
20 MINUTE NEIGHBOURHOODS
ACTIVE & SOCIAL LIFESTYLES
627
DRIVING CONCEPT “live in appropriate housing, within walking, cycling or rapid and reliable public transport distance to employment and education, social and health services, healthy food, and good quality public open space� [Whitzman, C. et al, 2012]
628
20 MINUTE TYPOLOGICAL ELEMENTS_
Public Transport | PPTN 400m Catchment
Primary School | 400m Catchment
Amenity | ACZ CZ MUZ & Activity Centres
Walkability | 70+ Score Rating & SNAMUTS
Open Space | PPRZ 400m Catchment
629
20 MINUTE NEIGHBOURHOODS_
23.27%
20 Minute Neighbourhoods / Urban Growth Boundary
20 Minute Neighbourhoods
630
631
SELECTED LOTS = FHSC 643M2 +/- 10%_
62,097 Number of Lots
6.5
Dwellings/Lot
Redeveloped Lots Empty Lots
58,513 3,584
60,128
Replaced Dwellings
343,503 / 3996 HA Total Net Dwelling Density in Ha [Rounded]
632
633
DWELLING DENSITY CHANGE_
12 DWGS / HA Net
86 DWGS / HA Net
634
DEMOGRAPHIC CHANGE_
2.7 Average Household
people [ABS]
>
5.7x 162,346
people within 20 minute neighbourhoods
927,457
people within 20 minute neighbourhoods
635
EXISTING RESIDENTIAL ZONING_ 995 HA 471 HA Residential Growth Zones
Mixed Use Zones
6,405 HA
General Residential Zones
14,162 HA
Neighbourhood Residential Zones
636
637
PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL ZONING_ 1,466 HA
Unchanged
20,567 HA Re-Zoned
638
639
PLANNING SUPPORT IMPLEMENTATION_ As LiveAble Housing providers, we are a not-for-profit organisation. The following implementation plan outlines legislative changes needed to enable us to implement our housing and amenity over the next 30 years and beyond.
640
641
COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT AND FEEDBACK DURING ALL PHASES
642
Community engagement large part of stakeholder engagement & management in the blue phase. Continues throughout all phases. Co-creation workshops, interviews, prototypes & testing will provide insights on community need for affordable social housing & preferences for this type of housing.
2022-2023
2021-2022
PLANNING SUPPORT IMPLEMENTATION_
Amendments made to VPP & Brimbank’s planning scheme to initially be voluntary & recommended in yellow phase. Incremental change. Incentivising community housing providers through government funding and support. Feedback from community engagement strongly shows the need for affordable social housing in Metropolitan Melbourne. This will cause a shift towards funding for affordable housing [especially post-covid-19].
2030 AND BEYOND
BEYOND 2050
After the voluntary amendments are successful in Cairnlea, Brimbank & most of Metropolitan Melbourne, the Provisions would be further amended to be made mandatory, so as to ensure Melbourne never fall below the social housing stock line in future, thus ensuring secure futures for all melbournians, clear processes for planning & development for CHPs and better housing for all.
Cairnlea Park precinct to run successful pilot of voluntary liveable housing in 20 minute neighbourhood by 2025. Brimbank to to reach sustainable annual stock of liveable housing [1 in 3] by 2050. After 2050, Metropolitan Melbourne to aim for same model at Brimbank. This is subject to change, as other municipalities may start their liveable housing pilots earlier if pilot is very successful in Brimbank.
643
LIVEABLE HOUSING IMPLEMENTATION ROADMAP_
644
2050
BEYOND
BEYOND
BEYOND
GREATER MELBOURNE
BEYOND
BEYOND 645
FURTHER INVESTIGATION_
646
647
3 TYPICAL SUBURBAN LOTS L SUBURBAN LOTS SIDE-BY-SIDE IDE GROUND FLOOR PLAN I SCALE 1:200 @A2 21 DWELLINGS NGS 2. 2. 2. 2. 2.
+
+
FLOOR PLANS
+
4 TYPICAL SUBURBAN LOTS SIDE-BY-SIDE/ BACK-TO-BACK 28 DWELLINGS
=
+
2 X COMMUNITY SPACE 8 X DWELLINGS
GROUND FLOOR PLAN I SCALE 1:200 2.
648
2.
+
+
2.
+
2.
+
2.
=
2 X COMMUNITY SPACE 8 X DWELLINGS
GROUND PLAN FIRST FLOOR PLAN I FLOOR SCALE 1:200 @A2 2.
2. 2.
2.
2.
2.
I SCALE 1:200 2.
2.
2.
+ + + + + + + +
2.
2 X COMMUNITY 2 X COMMUNITY SPACE 8 X DWELLINGS 8 X DWELLINGS
= =
SPACE
FIRST FLOOR PLAN I SCALE 1:200 2.
2.
+
+
2.
+
2.
+
2.
=
2 X COMMUNITY SPACE 8 X DWELLINGS
649
SECOND FLOOR PLAN I SCALE 1:200 @A2
2.
4.
+
650
+
4.
+
2.
=
2 X COMMUNITY SPACE 10 X DWELLINGS
ROOF FLOOR PLAN I SCALE 1:200 @A2
651
ROOF PLAN RENDERED PERSPECTIVE
652
SITE PLAN 9AM SHADOW CAST SPRING EQUINOX
0
20m
653
SITE PLAN 12PM SHADOW CAST SPRING EQUINOX
0
654
20m
SITE PLAN 3PM SHADOW CAST SPRING EQUINOX
0
20m
655
2 BEDROOM APARTMENT GROUND - FIRST FLOOR
GROSS FLOOR AREA: 96M2 INTERNAL AREA: 82M2 EXTERNAL AREA: 14M2
656
3 BEDROOM APARTMENT GROUND - FIRST FLOOR
GROSS FLOOR AREA: 121M2 INTERNAL AREA: 110M2 EXTERNAL AREA: 11M2
657
1 BEDROOM APARTMENT SECOND FLOOR
GROSS FLOOR AREA: 48M2 INTERNAL AREA: 40M2 EXTERNAL AREA: 8M2
658
4 BEDROOM APARTMENT GROUND - SECOND FLOOR
GROSS FLOOR AREA: 120M2 INTERNAL AREA: 111M2 EXTERNAL AREA: 9M2
659
STUDIO APARTMENT SECOND FLOOR
GROSS FLOOR AREA: 39M2 INTERNAL AREA: 29M2 EXTERNAL AREA: 10M2
GROSS FLOOR AREA: 39M2 INTERNAL AREA: 29M2 EXTERNAL AREA: 10M2
660
5 BEDROOM APARTMENT GROUND - FIRST FLOOR
GROSS FLOOR AREA: 154M2 INTERNAL AREA: 138M2 EXTERNAL AREA: 16M2
661
TYPICAL APARTMENT ENTRANCE RENDERED PERSPECTIVE
662
TYPICAL APARTMENT BEDROOM RENDERED PERSPECTIVE
663
TYPICAL APARTMENT LIVING RENDERED PERSPECTIVE
664
TYPICAL APARTMENT ENSUITE RENDERED PERSPECTIVE
665
MODULAR DESIGN PREFAB APPLICATION
WATERPROOFING SHIPLAP
666
MODULAR DESIGN ADAPTABLE SPACES
MODULAR DESIGN REPLICABLE CONSTRUCTION
667
SECTIONS_
SECTION C | NORTH-SOUTH SECTION WEST FACING 1:200 @A2
668
SECTION A | EAST-WEST SECTION SOUTH FACING 1:200 @A2
SECTION B | EAST-WEST SECTION NORTH FACING 1:200 @A2
669
EAST ELEVATION 1:100 @A2
670
EAST ELEVATION 1:100 @A2
671
RESIDENTIAL TYPOLOGIES_ TYPICAL SINGLE LOT AMALGAMATION 7 DWELLINGS
672
TYPICAL 2 LOT SIDE BY SIDE AMALGAMATION 14 DWELLINGS
TYPICAL 2 LOT SIDE BY SIDE AMALGAMATION 21 DWELLINGS
TYPICAL 4 LOT SIDE BY SIDE AMALGAMATION 28 DWELLINGS
673
AMENITY TYPOLOGIES_
• fresh food producers • fruit markets / grocers • offices for local job opportunities • cultural / entertainment amenities • post office • pharmacy • dentist • medical specialists
674
TWO CORNERS
GROUND FLOOR
L-SHAPE_1/4
U-SHAPE_1/2
TWO GROUPS OF AMENITIES
FOUR GROUPS OF AMENITIES
675
ARCHITECTURAL TYPOLOGIES_
TYPICAL SINGLE LOT AMALGAMATION
676
TYPICAL 3 LOT AMALGAMATION
TYPICAL 2 LOT SIDE BY SIDE AMALGAMATION
TYPICAL 3 LOT SIDE BY SIDE AMALGAMATION
677
INTERNAL CIRCULATION SOCIAL INTERACTIONS
678
INTERSTITIAL FACADE SLIDING SHADING
679
PERMIABLE ROOFTOPS COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT
680
LENSE FLARE AMBIENT CORNER PRIVATE SPACES
681
HABITAT CAFE AFFORDABLE FOOD OPTIONS
682
LITTLE LIVEABLES CHILDCARE AMENITY
683
LIVEABLE HOUSING COMMUNITY
684
685
686
687
PROGRAM DESIGN FOR RESIDENTS AND SNAPSHOTS OF LIFE_
A COMMUNITY LED LITTLE BOOKSTORE & LITTLE KITCHEN FOOD AND BOOKS PROVIDED BY THE PUBLIC & RESIDENTS. INTENDED TO BE FREE TO THOSE IN NEED OF ASSISTANCE DUE TO HOUSEHOLD STRESS. SUNDAY FRESH FOOD & GOODS MARKET FOOD EXCHANGE, BOOK EXCHANGE AND CLOTHES EXCHANGE.
688
RUN BY RESIDENTS TO ENSURE MORE SUSTAINABLE DISPOSAL OF UNUSED BOOKS
LITTLE LIVEABLES A TYPICAL WEEKDAY AT THE GROUND FLOOR LOCAL CORNER CHILDCARE.
RESIDENTS SIT IN THEIR PRIVATE COURTYARD ON THE GROUND FLOOR. SUN GENTLY EASES INTO THE SPACE, PROVIDING WARMTH.
COMMUNITY GARDEN GARDENING WORKSHOPS ON A WEDNESDAY MORNING
A TYPICAL WEEKEND ALONG THE CAR FREE ADJACENT ZONES TO THE LIVEABLE HOUSING COMPLEX. OUTDOOR ACTIVITIES FOR FAMILIES.
689
SUSTAINABILITY | SOLAR POWER AND GREEN ROOFS ON ARCHITECTURE_ water tanks on rooftops on level 2 roof to ensure rainwater is captured and reused in gardens.
solar panels on green roofs to ensure maintained temperature range between 15-25 degrees using cooling effects of grass and planting
green roof 500 thickness to ensure cooling during summer months and rainwater capture for use in gardens. cooling of rooftops keeps interiors cool, and keeps rooftops cool. more energy efficienct, less energy related costs for residents. more affordable and comfortable living.
690
691
SUSTAINABILITY | FOOD, BOOKS, ORGANIC WASTE - ADAPTIVE REUSE_
VARIOUS MARKETS ON SUNDAYS FOR CLOTHES EXCHANGE, FOOD EXCHANGE, LOW-COST FOOD OPTIONS, GOODS EXCHANGE FOOD STALLS LOTS OF PRODUCE COMES FROM THE COMMUNITY FRUIT AND VEGETABLE GARDEN; FREE TO ALL
692
RESIDENT COMMUNITY ORGANIC GARDEN RESIDENTS PLANT SEEDS, ATTEND WEEKLY GARDENING WORKSHOPS AND HARVEST PRODUCE FOR MARKETS AND FOR PERSONAL USE
WORM FARM MODULES FROM COMPOST REVOLUTION
RESIDENTS PLACE ORGANIC WASTE IN FARM. FARM PROCESSES UP TO 2L OF ORGANIC WASTE WEEKLY, AND CONTAINS TWO TRAYS FOR CONTINUOUS FLOW OF LIQUID FERTILISER AND WORM CASTINGS. CLOSED-LOOP FOOD WASTE SYSTEM.
693
LIVEABLE HOUSING | CHANGING AFFORDABLE HOUSING_
694
695
รท
BRIMBANK 20 MINUTE NEIGHBOURHOODS_
73,911
Brimbank Projected Total Dwellings
1/3
Social Housing Aim
2,062
Existing Social Housing
22,575
Needed Additional Social Housing Dwellings
20 Minute Neighbourhoods Chosen 20 Minute Neighbourhood
696
697
รท
DEER PARK | NET DWELLINGS PER HECTARE_
3518
Number of Dwellings
197.59 HA
Total Net Residential Area in Ha
18 DWG / HA
Total Net Dwelling Density in Ha [Rounded]
LOTS
1 Dwg 2 Dwg 3 Dwg 4 Dwg
698
3418 28 8 5
699
DEER PARK | NET DWELLINGS PER HECTARE [MAX YIELD]_
3518
Number of Properties
7,631
Additional Dwellings [6.5 Dwellings/Lot]
Redeveloped Lots Empty Lots
1104 70
1,108
Replaced Dwellings
33 DWG / HA [6,523 DWG] Total Net Dwelling Density in Ha [Rounded]
700
701
DEER PARK | CAIRNLEA PARK PRECINCT LIVEABLE DEVELOPMENT PILOT_
Deer Park 20 Minute Neighbourhood Cairnlea Park Precinct LiveAble Development Pilot
702
703
SUBURBS_
Cairnlea Deer Park
704
705
CURRENT ZONES_
NRZ C1Z GRZ PPRZ PUZ2
706
707
PROPOSED ZONES_
RGZ C1Z MUZ PPRZ PUZ2
708
709
STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMEMT WITH BRIMBANK CITY COUNCIL_ SEMI-STRUCTURED ZOOM INTERVIEW
QUESTIONS ASKED
1. How does Brimbank city council aim for make housing more affordable for its residents? 2. How have you seen covid-19 impact local government stance on social housing supply? 3. Is Brimbank city council in support of the legislation proposed by the greens for greater densification of
affordable housing stock? How does it compare and contrast to the Brimbank LGA strategy? 4. What dwelling type and amenity for social housing supply is Brimbank council focused on delivering? 5. When new affordable housing is approved/ proposed by Brimbank council, how much is the sites
proximity to amenity and public transport a consideration? 6. Currently around 8% of Melbournians on the social housing waitlist are waiting for housing they become
available within Brimbank, how does this compare to the current Brimbank proposal for delivery of dwellings? 7. What will be the key challenges for housing and supporting projected population growth in Brimbank
over the coming years? 8. Are there any plans for that massive site on deer park that’s unused? 9. How would Brimbank feel about our proposal (the key changes that you guys proposed in your planning
report) for enhancing amenity around a densification of affordable housing? 10. 10. What would be the failures/ unachievables of this proposal?
710
STRATEGIC PLANNER KEY POINTS FROM INTERVIEW • The ability to add affordable housing, even if there a restrictions on amenity and services within the area • Big challenges with stakeholders, and community perception when it comes to affordable housing section 173 agreement that highlights critical things to be signed on from parties • Position statements as common methods for gaining approval for building affordable housing, lots of examples of this • Community engagement and collaboration is very important • Ideal to have voluntary provisions for affordable housing, as it is controversial to mandate currently in melbourne • Voluntary provisions can be confusing, and as such somtimes developers do not interpret the provisions correctly or choose to ignore (or overlook) • Strategy has to look at the next 30 years • Based off local council laws • Translation of all planning schemes across melbourne happening now • Findings from affordable housing community liasing show that overwhelmingly home owners were opposed to affordable housing being built around them, wheras home renters were less opposed • Can’t mandate the provision of affordable housing, its a voluntary negotiation process • Request an affordable housing contribution within some zones and overlay clauses within some zones and overlay clauses
711
STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMEMT WITH BRIMBANK CITY COUNCIL_ UNSTRUCTURED PHONE INTERVIEW
STATUTORY PLANNER KEY POINTS FROM INTERVIEW • • • • • • •
• •
712
Increase bus frequency Look into the contamination in cairnlea History of cairnlea; former amunition production Original development plan overlay is from the 80s/90s Look into section 173 for ways we can provide guidelines to our housing Look into ardern as a precedent for affordable housing We want to be developing in an activity centre zone, mixed use zone or residential growrth zone, not neighbourhood residential or general residential We need to know who owns land and how we can purchase/what we can purchase Incremental changes rather than radical
MOVEMENT & PAUSE HUMAN SCALE TRANSIT
713
SELECTED LOTS_
251
Number of Lots
6.5
Dwellings/Lot
Redeveloped Lots Empty Lots Untouched
232 19 336
232
Replaced Dwellings
30 DWGS / HA [1,400 DWGS] Total Net Dwelling Density in Ha [Rounded]
714
715
EXISTING AMENITIES_
Fast Food x1 Retail & Fast Food x3
Kindergarten x1
Primary School x2 Mechanic x1 Petrol x1 Recreational Facility x1 Medical Centre x2
Community Hub x1 Library x1
Place of Worship x1
716
717
STREET REALM TYPOLOGIES_
ONE WAY ROAD
GREENERY PEDESTRIAN BIKE PATH
718
STATION ROAD
BUS INTERCHANGE AT STATION ROAD
719
720 1.5 2.2 3.3 1.5 1.85 1.85m
NATURE STRIP CAR PARK
ONE WAY LANE
NATURE STRIP BIKE PATH FOOTPATH
PARK
1.85m 1.85
BIKE PATH
FOOTPATH
PINEWOOD CRESCENT 16M
1.85m 1.85 1.5
BIKE PATH NATURE STRIP
1.85 1.85m FOOTPATH
1.5 BIKE PATH
NATURE STRIP
GREENERY STRIP
FOOTPATH
16M BLACKWOOD CIRCUIT
721
722 3.9 2.2 3.3 3.3 5.0 3.3
CAR PARK 1
CAR LANE 1A
CAR LANE 1B
ISLAND 1
CAR LANE 2A
3.3 3.3 4.0 NATURE STRIP
2.7 FOOTPATH
BIKE PATH
5.1 CAR LANE 3A (ONE WAY LANE)
2.2 ISLAND 2
CAR PARK 2
CAR LANE 2B
2.7
NATURE STRIP
2m
BIKE PATH
FOOTPATH
STATION ROAD_50.6m
STATION ROAD 50.6M
2m
5.0 3.3 3.3 3.0 4.0 NATURE STRIP
PARK
2.7 FOOTPATH
BIKE PATH
3.0 SHARED PATH
3.5 BUS STOP 2
BUS STOP LANE 2
CAR LANE 2B
3.3
CAR LANE 2A
NATURE STRIP + BUS STOP 1
3.3
ISLAND 1
BIKE PATH
3.5
CAR LANE 1B
3.9
CAR LANE 1A
2.7
BUS STOP LANE 1
2m
FOOTPATH
NEW INTERCHANGE AT STATION ROAD 50.6M
2m
723
PRECINCT PROPOSED TRANSIT NETWORK_
Vehicular Movement
Bike Paths & Footpaths
724
725
NEIGHBOURHOOD PROPOSED TRANSIT NETWORK_
Vehicular Movement
Bike Paths & Footpaths
726
727
CURRENT BUS TIMETABLES_
420 423 420 = ~1/20 mins peak & inter-peak 423 = ~1/30 mins peak & 1/40 mins inter-peak 942 = 1/hr x 5hrs Saturdays & 1/hr x 6hrs Sunday
728
729
PROPOSED BUS TIMETABLES_
420 423 420 = ~1/10 mins peak & inter-peak 423 = ~1/10 mins peak & inter-peak 942 = 1/30 mins x 6hrs Saturdays & Sundays
730
731
BUS STOP SHELTER DESIGN INTERVENTION_ BOX GUTTER
COMMUNAL LIBRARY/ FOOD PROGRAM
SOLAR PANELS
BIKE STORAGE
SHELTER
PERMEABLE CONCRETE BIKE RACK
732
733
SUSTAINABILITY | TREE CANOPY COVERAGE_
B R I M B A N K ’ S TREE 2046 BRIMBANK INCREASE TREE PLANTING CANOPY COVER TO 30% INCREASE PERMEABILITY
TO 50%
POPULATION O N
PUBLIC LAND IS APPROXIMATELY
200,000 TREES
- BRIMBANK CITY COUNCIL, URBAN FOREST STRATEGY 2016-2046 734
30% CANOPY
COVER INCREASE
=
A N O T H E R 700,000 TREES
C A I R N L E A
AMOUNT OF TREES
PRECINCT
PRECINCT IS
71.15 HECTARES
GROSS AREA
PLANTED
IN
3467 735
SUSTAINABILITY | TREE CANOPY COVERAGE_
B R I M B A N K 1 2 , 3 3 8 H E C T A R E S
GROSS AREA 736
AMOUNT OF TREES
PLANTED IN
B R I M B A N K
CURRENTLY IS 200,000
737
SUSTAINABILITY | TREE CANOPY COVERAGE_
P R OPOSE D HECTARE TO TREE RATI O ON PU B L IC L AND IS 4 9 TREES PER HEC TARE
EXISTING HECTARE TO TREE RATIO IN BRIMBANK ON PUBLIC L AND IS 16 TREES PER HECTAR E 738
T HAT IS AN INCRE ASE I N OVER 300% OF TR E E S PER PER HEC TARE
739
BEFORE PRECINCT TREE PLANTING_
740
AFTER PRECINCT TREE PLANTING_
741
USER’S PERSPECTIVE_
742
743
ONE LAST NOTE | $5.3 BILLION TO BE PUT INTO SOCIAL HOUSING BY ANDREWS GOVERNMENT!_ PREMIER DANIEL ANDREWS KEY QUOTES:
BIG HOUSING BUILD KEY INITIATIVES:
“This will change lives – giving thousands of Victorians the security and stability of a home, and tens of thousands of Victorians a job.”
“$5.3 billion Big Housing Build to construct more than 12,000 new homes throughout metro and regional Victoria, as well as supporting around 10,000 jobs, per year over the next four years, to supercharge Victoria’s economic recovery through the pandemic and beyond.”
“It’s a profound investment in a stronger, fairer Victoria – a Victoria that recognises everyone deserves a place to call home.” - premier of victoria, 2020
- premier of victoria, 2020
“Of the new units, 1,000 will be for Indigenous Australians, 1,000 for victims of domestic violence and 2,000 for people with a mental illness” - ABC news, 2020
KEY LINKS:
•https://www.premier.vic.gov.au/victorias-big-housing-build •https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-11-15/victorian-governmentannounces-$5.3b-to-build-new-public-housing/12884962 •https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-11-15/victoria-to-build12000-homes-under-social-housing-program/12885144?nw=0
744
745
LIVEABLE PLACES_ AMY RODDA : LIVEABLE URBANITY_
GROUP 4 : LIVEABLE NEIGHBOURHOODS_
PARIS TRIANTIS : LIVEABLE ENVIRONMENTS_
UNIT: ARC70003/80002 DESIGN RESEARCH STUDIO B/C_STUDIO 6 : ZOOMBURBIA2.0! FUTURE HOMES & THE CITY OF SHORT DISTANCES - UNIT LEADER: DR IAN WOODCOCK
UNIT: ARC70003/80002 DESIGN RESEARCH STUDIO B/C_STUDIO 6 : ZOOMBURBIA2.0! FUTURE HOMES & THE CITY OF SHORT DISTANCES - UNIT LEADER: DR IAN WOODCOCK
20 MINUTE NEIGHBOURHOOD INDICATORS_
AMY RODDA | ARSEN SARKISIAN | MEGAN MURRAY | PARASKEVI TRIANTIS
ZONING AND IMPLEMENTATION IN CAIRNLEA
Unit: ARC70003/80002 Design Research Studio B/C_Studio 6 : Zoomburbia2.0! Future Homes & the City of Short Distances - Unit Leader: Dr Ian Woodcock
LiveAble Housing is a project that has manifested from an in depth analysis into Victoria’s shortfall in quality, affordable housing within 20-minute neighbourhoods. LiveAble Housing is something that should be a choice to not only those who meet the requirements but to anyone who wants to lead a liveable lifestyle within a 20 minute neighbourhood & 40 minute city. A lifestyle that is for the long-term, and is accessible, inclusive, & sustainable with a wide diversity of people, places, & amenities - all within walking distance. Thus, our goal is to have every 1 in 3 dwellings to be some sort of LiveAble Housing. Cairnlea Park LiveAble Development Strategy & Precinct Proposal is our strategic, statutory & spatial response to our LiveAble Housing design proposal, in which we have been investigating high amenity, affordable, medium density housing alternatives to enhance Melbourne’s 20-minute neighbourhood goals.
Public Transport | PPTN 400m Catchment
Primary School | 400m Catchment
Amenity | ACZ CZ MUZ & Activity Centres
Walkability | 70+ Score Rating & SNAMUTS
Open Space | PPRZ 400m Catchment
DEMOGRAPHIC IMPACT_
SELECTED LOTS = FHSC 643M2 +/- 10%_
62,097
23.27%
Number of Lots
20 Minute Neighbourhoods / Urban Growth Boundary
6.5
Dwellings/Lot
Redeveloped Lots Empty Lots
58,513 3,584
CAIRNLEA PARK LIVEABLE DEVELOPM
60,128
Replaced Dwellings
[Original Data Sourced from Aurin, 2020]
SUBURBS :
SELECTED LOTS :
EXISTING AMENITIES :
Cairnlea Deer Park
Fast Food x1
Mechanic x1
Community Hub x1
Retail & Fast Food x3
Petrol x1
Library x1
Kindergarten x1
Recreational Facility x1
Place of Worship x1
Primary School x2
Medical Centre x2
Vacant Lots - 19 Redeveloped Lots - 232 Untouched - 336 Existing Density | 12 dwgs / Ha Proposed Density | ~50 dwgs / Ha
343,503 / 3996 HA Total Net Dwelling Density in Ha [Rounded]
20 Minute Neighbourhoods
CURRENT ZONES :
1:3000 MASTERPLAN CAIRNLEA SOLOMON DRIVE PRECINCT WITHIN DEER PARK/CAIRNLEA 20 MINUTE NEIGHBOURHOOD CATCHMENT
C1Z
NRZ
GRZ PPRZ PUZ2
SITE PLAN 9AM_
SITE PLAN 12PM_
SITE PLAN 3PM_ 54
CURRENT DWELLING DENSITY_
MACRO SCALE INTERVENTION_
12 DWGS / HA
ARC80007 | Assessment 03_Planning Report
DEMOGRAPHIC IMPACT_ Based on ABS Average Household Sizes in Melbourne
Net
PROPOSED DWELLING DENSITY_
2.7
86 DWGS / HA Net
Average Household
>
5.7x 162,346
people
people within 20 minute neighbourhoods
EXISTING RESIDENTIAL ZONING_
VIEW FROM INTERIOR COURTYARD TO PUBLIC/PRIVATE TERRACE CIRCULATION
people within 20 minute neighbourhoods
PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL REZONING_ 1,466 HA
HA 471 HA 995 Residential Growth Zones
Mixed Use Zones
1:200 SOUTH ELEVATION SHOWING THE LANDSCAPING, PRIVACY, SCREENING AND PLANTING
927,457
Unchanged
6,405 HA
General Residential Zones
0
10m
0
10m
0
10m
14,162 HA
20,567 HA
Neighbourhood Residential Zones
Re-Zoned
EXTERNAL MATERIALITY_
INTERNAL MATERIALITY_
MODULAR DESIGN PREFAB APPLICATION ROOFING
VIEW OF THE LIVEABLE HOUSING BEING REPLICATED ACROSS ELIGIBLE LOTS WITHIN CAIRNLEA PRECINCT
WATERPROOFING SHIPLAP BIO SOLAR GREEN ROOF WATER RETENTION 400MM THICK SOIL LOW UHI
AUSTRAL MARINE AAA PLYWOOD
VODA SINK MIXER PULL OUT
PVC DOUBLE-GLAZED WINDOWS & DOORS
AFFINITY POLYFLOR PUR FINISH
HELIOSCREEN INTERNAL BLACKOUT
BOTTEGA CALIZA SLIP RESISTANT
VODA TWIN RAIL SHOWER
WATTYL I.D. ANTIQUE WHITE USA
AS/NZS 2272
ANTIMICROBIAL
TILT & TURN/STACKER
STRAIGHT LAID PLANK
HELIOGREEN CALAIS
CONCRETE LOOK
WITH OVERHEAD
19MM THICKNESS
BRUSHED COPPER
WHITE
CHAMPAGNE OAK 9785
SILVER LF & BO
1200X600MM TILE
BRUSHED COPPER
FLAT FINISH
2 POINT GBCA
2 POINT GBCA
WELS 5 STAR RATED
WERS STAR RATED
GREEN TAG CERT.
1 STAR GCBA
GREENRATE LEVEL A
WELS 3 STAR RATED
1 STAR GCBA
EAST-WEST SECTION SOUTH FACING
746
AUSTRAL MARINE AAA PLYWOOD
AS/NZS 2272 19MM THICKNESS
EAST-WEST SECTION SOUTH FACING
NORTH-SOUTH SECTION WEST FACING
FULL / SEMI GLOSS /
1:200 WEST ELEVATIO
SNAPSHOTS OF LIFE COMMUNITY GARDEN GARDENING WORKSHOPS ON A WEDNESDAY MORNING
ARSEN SARKISIAN : LIVEABLE MOVEMENT_
MEGAN MURRAY : LIVEABLE HOUSING_
AMENITIES
MODULARITY
UNIT: ARC70003/80002 DESIGN RESEARCH STUDIO B/C_STUDIO 6 : ZOOMBURBIA2.0! FUTURE HOMES & THE CITY OF SHORT DISTANCES - UNIT LEADER: DR IAN WOODCOCK
UNIT: ARC70003/80002 DESIGN RESEARCH STUDIO B/C_STUDIO 6 : ZOOMBURBIA2.0! FUTURE HOMES & THE CITY OF SHORT DISTANCES - UNIT LEADER: DR IAN WOODCOCK
MODULAR CONSTRUCTION
ROAD TYPOLOGIES
SUNDAY FRESH FOOD AND GOODS MARKET. FOOD EXCHANGE, BOOK EXCHANGE AND CLOTHES EXCHANGE.
TRANSPORT INFRASTRUCTURE SECTIONS
REPLICABILITY
MODULAR TRANSPORTATION
AMENITIES IN PROPOSAL
SINGLE TYPICAL SUBURBAN LOT 7 DWELLINGS
3 TYPICAL SUBURBAN LOTS SIDE-BY-SIDE 21 DWELLINGS
2 TYPICAL SUBURBAN LOTS SIDE-BY-SIDE 14 DWELLINGS
4 TYPICAL SUBURBAN LOTS SIDE-BY-SIDE/ BACK-TO-BACK 28 DWELLINGS
FLOOR PLANS
ONE WAY ROAD
CAIRNLEA PARK LIVEABLE DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY PRECINCT
PINEWOOD CRES
MENT STRATEGY PRECINCT
CAFE
[Original Data Sourced from Aurin, 2020]
CURRENT ZONES : C1Z
54
NRZ
C1Z
GRZ
MUZ
PPRZ
PPRZ
PUZ2
PUZ2
RGZ
A TYPICAL WEEKEND ALONG THE CAR FREE ADJACENT ZONES TO THE LIVEABLE HOUSING COMPLEX. OUTDOOR ACTIVITIES FOR FAMILIES.
ARC80007 | Assessment 03_Planning Report
Amy Rodda_102520063 | Arsen Sarkisian_102757023 | Paraskevi Triantis_7686293
CHILDCARE
BUS STOP SHELTER DESIGN INTERVENTION
PROPOSED ZONES :
SOLAR PANELS
55
GREENERY PEDESTRIAN AND BIKE PATH
BOX GUTTER
BIKE STORAGE
GROUND FLOOR PLAN I SCALE 1:200
[Original Data Sourced from Aurin, 2020]
2.
PROPOSED ZONES : C1Z
RGZ
BLACKWOOD CT
MUZ PPRZ PUZ2
Amy Rodda_102520063 | Arsen Sarkisian_102757023 | Paraskevi Triantis_7686293
COMMUNAL LIBRARY / FOOD PROGRAM
+
2.
+
2.
+
2.
=
2 X COMMUNITY SPACE 8 X DWELLINGS
PERMEABLE CONCRETE
55
RESIDENTS SIT IN THEIR PRIVATE COURTYARD ON THE GROUND FLOOR. SUN GENTLY EASES INTO THE SPACE, PROVIDING WARMTH.
2.
+
SHELTER
BIKE RACK
GREENERY PEDESTRIAN FOOTPATH AND BIKE PATHS
STATION ROAD
ON FRONT FACADE SHOWING TRELLIS AND ROOFTOP PLANTING
STATION ROAD A TYPICAL WEEKDAY AT THE GROUND FLOOR LOCAL CORNER CHILDCARE.
TYPICAL APARTMENT ENTRY
TYPICAL APARTMENT BEDROOM
FIRST FLOOR PLAN I SCALE 1:200 2.
NEW INTERCHANGE AT STATION ROAD
2.
+
TYPICAL APARTMENT LAYOUTS
BUS INTERCHANGE AT STATION ROAD
+
2.
+
2.
+
2.
=
2 X COMMUNITY SPACE 8 X DWELLINGS
NEW BUS STOP AND INTERVENTION
A COMMUNITY LED LITTLE BOOKTSTORE AND LITTLE KITCHEN. FOOD AND BOOKS PROVIDED BY THE PUBLIC AND RESIDENTS. INTENDED TO BE FREE TO THOSE IN NEED OF ASSISTANCE DUE TO HOUSEHOLD STRESS.
STUDIO APARTMENT I SCALE 1:100 GROSS FLOOR AREA: 39M2 INTERNAL FLOOR AREA: 29M2 GROSS FLOOR AREA: 10M2
1 BEDROOM APARTMENT I SCALE 1:100 GROSS FLOOR AREA: 48M2 INTERNAL FLOOR AREA: 40M2 GROSS FLOOR AREA: 8M2
2 BEDROOM APARTMENT I SCALE 1:100 GROSS FLOOR AREA: 96M2 INTERNAL FLOOR AREA: 82M2 GROSS FLOOR AREA: 14M2
SECOND FLOOR PLAN I SCALE 1:200 2.
4.
+
STUDIO APARTMENT I SCALE 1:100 GROSS FLOOR AREA: 39M2 INTERNAL FLOOR AREA: 29M2 GROSS FLOOR AREA: 10M2
1 BEDROOM APARTMENT I SCALE 1:100 GROSS FLOOR AREA: 48M2 INTERNAL FLOOR AREA: 40M2 GROSS FLOOR AREA: 8M2
+
4.
+
2.
=
2 X COMMUNITY SPACE 10 X DWELLINGS
2 BEDROOM APARTMENT I SCALE 1:100 GROSS FLOOR AREA: 96M2 INTERNAL FLOOR AREA: 82M2 GROSS FLOOR AREA: 14M2 ROOFTOP GARDEN FLOOR PLAN I SCALE 1:200
NORTH ELEVATION I SCALE 1:200
SECTION AA I SCALE 1:200
747
REFERENCES N-Z_ • National Construction Code, 2019, ‘Section D Access and egress’, NCC 2019
Volume One Amendment 1, [online], Available: https://ncc.abcb.gov.au/ncc-online/ NCC/2019-A1/NCC-2019-Volume-One-Amendment-1/Section-D-Access-andEgress/Section-D-Access-And-Egress-sub-item-28 • National Disability Insurance Agency, 2018, What is the NDIS Responsible for?, NDIS, [online], Available: https://www.ndis.gov.au/understanding/what-ndisresponsible • NCBDDD, 2020, Common Barriers to Participation Experienced by People with
Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, [online], Available: https:// www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/disabilityandhealth/disability-barriers.html • NDSS, 2020, Diabetes Map, Australian Government, [online], Available: https:// map.ndss.com.au/#!/ • Newton, P., 2010, Beyond Greenfield and Brownfield: The Challenge of
Regenerating Australia’s Greyfield Suburbs, Vol. 36., Built Environment, Alexandrine Press, [online], Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/23289985?seq=1 • Office of the Victorian Government Architect, 2020, The case for good design:
Housing, Victoria State Government, [online], Available: https://www.ovga.vic.gov. au/case-good-design-housing-guide-government
xi
• Parker, P., 2019, Timetable Tuesday #18: Route 420 - the L of the west, Melbourne on Transit, [online], Available: https://melbourneontransit.blogspot. com/2019/04/timetable-tuesday-18-route-420-l-of-west.html#:~:text=420%20 is%20less%20frequent%20on,also%20run%20every%2020%20minutes. • PD&R Edge Home, 2020, Vienna’s Unique Social Housing Program, HUD User, [online], Available: https://www.huduser.gov/portal/pdredge/pdr_edge_featd_ article_011314.html • People with Disability Australia, 2018, 2019 Federal Budget, [online], Available: https://pwd.org.au/2019-federal-budget/ • Pfeifer, Z., 2017, Du Meine Konkete Utopie, Zara Pfeifer, [online], Available: http://www.zarapfeifer.com/du-meine-konkrete-utopie • Polyflor, 2020, Affinity, [online], Available: https://www.polyflor.com.au/ amfilerating/file/download/file_id/916/ • Productivity Commission, 2020, Victoria’s Commercial Land Use Zoning,
Productivity Reform Case Study, Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra, [online], Available: https://www.pc.gov.au/research/completed/vic-commercial-zoning/viccommercial-zoning.pdf • PTV, 2020, Route 420, [online], Available: https://d309ul1fvo6zfp.cloudfront. net/1604268706326/bus-8710-2017-11-26-2020-12-31.pdf
• PTV, 2020, Route 423, [online], Available: https://d309ul1fvo6zfp.cloudfront.
• Rains, M., Butland, R., 2013, Lifting the Barriers: Planning for Increased
net/1604268706326/bus-11323-2018-07-16-2020-12-31.pdf
Mobility and Accessibility through the Adelaide CBD., School of Natural and Built Environments, The University of South Australia, [online], Available: https://apo.org.
• PTV, 2020, Route 942, [online], Available: https://d309ul1fvo6zfp.cloudfront.
au/sites/default/files/resource-files/2013-11/apo-nid59907.pdf
net/1604268706326/nightrider-11548-2020-10-16-2020-12-31.pdf • Ratio, 2018, GET THE BASICS RIGHT: THE ZONES AND THE PLANNING • Public Transport Division, 2008, Public Transport Guidelines for Land Use and
PROCESS, [online], Available: http://www.ratio.com.au/get-the-basics-right-the-
Development, Victoria State Government, [online], Available: https://transport.vic.
zones-and-the-planning-process
gov.au/about/planning/guidelines-for-land-use-development • Rebecca, 2015, Inclusive and Accessible Urban Spaces, id consulting, [online], • PVC Windows, 2020, Double Glazed Windows Supplier Australia, [online],
Available: https://blog.id.com.au/2015/id-news/fun-stuff/urban-spaces-for-
Available: https://pvcwindows.com.au/upvc-double-glazed-windows/
people-with-disability/
• QGIS, 2020, QGIS Geographic Information System, Open Source Geospatial
• Rebernik, N., Szajczyk, M., Bahillo, A., Marusic, B. G., 2020, Measuring Disability
Foundation Project, Available: http://qgis.osgeo.org/
Inclusion Performance in Cities Using Disability Inclusion Evaluation Tool (DIETool), Sustainability, [online], Available: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/4/1378/
• Rafiemanzelat, R., Emadi, M. I., Kamali, A. J., 2017, City sustainability: the
influence of walkability on built environments, Vol. 24, Transportation Research Procedia, [online], Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/
• Rex, la roche di rex, urban edge ceramics, [online], Available: https://www.
S2352146517303551
urbanedgeceramics.com.au/images/pdfs/laroche.pdf
• Ramage, C., 2020, Australian Walking and Cycling Conference 2020, cited
• Richardson, K., Merner, B., 2013, An Introduction to Victoria’s Planning System,
in tweet by @GillKing01, [online], Available: https://twitter.com/GillKing01/
Parliament of Victoria, [online], Available: https://www.parliament.vic.gov.au/
status/1311856765135323136?s=20
publications/research-papers/download/36-research-papers/13746-planning#_ ftn96
xii
• Senate Standing Committees on Community Affairs, 2017, Delivery of outcomes
• Sirr, R., 2019, SUBMISSION FROM PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES ACT (PWDACT)
under the National Disability Strategy 2010-2020 to build inclusive and accessible
AS PART OF THE ACT PRE-BUDGET CONSULTATION 2020-21, People
communities: Chapter 3 – Key Concerns and Ongoing Accessibility Issues,
with Disabilities ACT, [online], Available: https://pwdact.org.au/wp-content/
Parliament of Australia, [online], Available: https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_
uploads/2019/11/PWDACT-2020-21-Budget-Submission.pdf
Business/Committees/Senate/Community_Affairs/AccessibleCommunities/Report • Studco, 2020, Systems, [online], Available: https://www.studcosystems.com.au/ • Shield, M., 2020, Greens to introduce new bill that would set public housing
products/walls
targets in Victoria, The Greens Victoria, [online], Available: https://greens.org.au/ vic/news/greens-introduce-new-bill-would-set-public-housing-targets-victoria?fbcl
• Sustainable Construction Services, 2013, uPVC Entrance Doors, [online],
id=IwAR3CQtDB5yCinpSBB9wmuyfLNSXJXHsZA7MSJWnblzFVUs9hDBxXByljfMo
Available: http://www.sustainableconstructionservices.com.au/products/frontdoors-entrance-doors/upvc-entrance-doors
• Scheurer, J., 2020, pers. comm. • Taylor, G., 2016, ‘Can people own land in the ACT?’ Curious Canberra, ABC • Shorten, W. R., 2013, Building Code 2013, Federal Register of Legislation, [online],
NEWS, [online], Available: https://www.abc.net.au/news/specials/curious-
Available: https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/F2013L00130
canberra/2016-07-04/can-people-own-land-in-the-act/7550166?fbclid=IwAR06H M0U4wyCdv-hkg7c5Zu8gFvMaKs2qzrdWOs_cuVjmkYgKGyywbGQfss
• Sinclair, P., Creek, A., Marshall, T., 2005, The Former Albion Explosives Factory:
Cordite and TNT To Suburban Dream, Semantic Scholar, [online], Available:
• Thorpe, D., 2018, Why city halls should look to Vienna, not big developers, to
https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/The-Former-Albion-Explosives-
solve their affordable housing crises, The Fifth State, [online], Available: https://
Factory%3ACordite-And-To-Sinclair-Creek/4329061fff794a34a5cb78b4cc1d230fe
www.thefifthestate.com.au/innovation/residential-2/why-city-halls-should-look-to-
95d44cf
vienna-not-big-developers-to-solve-their-affordable-housing-crises/
• Trudgeon, M., 2020, pers. comm.
xiii
• United Nations, 2016, Disability, Accessibility and Sustainable Urban
• Whitzman, C., Giles-Corti, B., Lowe, M., Badland, H., Davern, M., Hes, D., Aye, L.,
Development, [online], Available: https://www.un.org/disabilities/documents/
Butterworth, I., 2012, Liveability Indicators: which will be most useful for integrated
Disability_and_Urban_development.pdf
planning in the NWMR?, University of Melbourne, [online], Available: https:// socialequity.unimelb.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0006/1979574/Liveability-
• United Nations, 2016, Good Practices of Accessible Urban Development,
Indicators-report.pdf
Department of Economics and Social Affairs: Social Inclusion, [online], Available: https://www.un.org/development/desa/dspd/2016/10/good-practices-of-
• Wikipedia, 2020, Alexandra Road Estate, [online], Available: https://en.wikipedia.
accessibleurban-development/
org/wiki/Alexandra_Road_Estate
• Urban Design Protocol, 2015, Creating Places for People: An Urban Design
• Winstanley, T., 2019, AD Classics: Trellick Tower / Erno Goldfinger, ArchDaily,
Protocol for Australian Cities, [online], Available: https://urbandesign.org.au/
[online], Available: https://www.archdaily.com/151227/ad-classics-trellick-tower-
protocol-framework/principles/walkable/
erno-goldfinger/50380e3428ba0d599b000ba0-ad-classics-trellick-tower-ernogoldfinger-plan-below-public-access
• Victorian Health and Human Services, Building Authority, 2020, Universal Design, Victoria State Government, [online], Available: https://www.vhhsba.vic.gov.au/
• Woodcock, I., 2020, pers. comm.
resources/universal-design • YourHome, 2020, Austalian Government, [online], Available: https://www. • VPA, 2017, Metropolitan Open Space Network: Provision and Distribution,
yourhome.gov.au/
Victoria State Government, [online], Available: https://vpa.vic.gov.au/wp-content/ uploads/2018/02/Open-Space-Network-Provision-and-Distribution-Reduced-Size. pdf?fbclid=IwAR3Yp6ZeCHHskGGsstrKyMGhlRZ9Y8pIq9E5FSZ0DepuAEfowxdu9v1FbqQ
xiv