http://www.hfoscillators.com/apskhanna/articles/MTTT1982

Page 1

1109

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MICROWAVE THEORY AND TECHNIQUES, VOL. MTT-30, NO. 7, JULY 1982

[5]

L, A, Weinstein, “The Theory of Diffraction Metiod~ in Generalized WzenerHopf Technique.

and the Factorization

Boulder, CO: Golem, 1969. S. W. Lee, W. R. Jones, and J. J. Campbell, “Convergence of numericrd solutions of iris-type discontinuity problems,” IEEE Trans. Microwaoe Theory Tech., vol. MTT- 19, pp. 528–536, June 1971.

[6]

(a)

(b)

Exact Derivation of the Nonlinear Negative-Resistance Oscillator Pulling Figure J. OBREGON Abstract figure

— Only approximate

of an oscillator.

AND A. P. S. KHANNA relations

are so far available

An exact derivation

of the pnlling

here, tafdng fufly into account the nonlinearity Effect

of the oscillator

nonlinearity

for the pufling

of the oscillator

on the asymmetry

(c)

figure is presented Fig,

admittance.

of the pulling

1.

Simulation

is presented.

and I.

INTRODUCTION

dBTo

ABL+ Oscillator

frequency

represented been

either

with

the

approximately the oscillator

taking

voltage

into

derivation

the nonlinear

relation

between Pulling

The pulling

the transferred perturbation figure

admittance

particular

calculated

by

admittance

in

fully

admittance.

of the oscillator

certain

has so far

AYL=AGL+ABL and

pulling

Y~o = G~o + BTO.

into The

From

cases are also pre-

FREQUENCY VARIATION WITH THE LOAD

The oscillation

condition

any load perturbation

at the oscillator-output

is represented

AGL% Au=

dGTo dBTo _ dGTO dBTo —. —— — dV do do “ dV

Y~ is the oscillator

nonlinear

dG ABL. ~

CHANGES

plane without

dGTo dBTo dGTo dBTo —— .— .— dv da dw dV

by

YTO=YT+YO=O where

(4) and (5)

range

has been de-

sented. 11.

(1)

output

admittance

and YO is

If the oscillations output

ing frequency

dG ABL. ~ exist with

and RF voltage

of A YL in the

Au and A~ as the correspond-

changes,

the oscillation

condition

Av=

do

Au

+

dY -#

AGL. ~

Av=o.

(2)

real and imaginary

dGTo

AGL + ~Aco+

III. From

parts

LOAD VARIATION

(4)

tion of AG by suitably line between

the oscillator

of the exact derivation Manuscript received November 18, 198 1; revised February 9, 1982. The authors are with Laboratoire d%fectronique des Microndes, E.R.A. au C.N.R.S., U.E.R. des Sciences, 123 rue Albert-Thomas, 87060 Limoges, Cedex, France.

0018-9480/82/0700-1

selecting

the reference figure,

For the purposes

we simulate

the load

the transmission-line

For any value of b’ = I?l, the transferred

IEEE

load perturba-

plane in the output

and the perturbation.

perturbation by AG (Fig. 1(b)) with variable between O and ~ /2.

109$00.7501982

load perturbation

by a nonreactive

of the pulling

(7)

SIMULATION

Fig. 1 it can be noted that any reactive

of value jA B cm be represented

dGTo ~Av=O

dGTo _dBTo “

dGTo dBTo dV”dudm”dV

(1) and (2)

into

dV dBTo

“~o

(3) separating

dGTo . _dBTo

dGTo — dBr-o —. dV do

by

Y~o+AYL+z. From

a load perturbation

plane and writing

can be represented

(6)

and

the load admittance. oscillator

(5)

where

admittance

taking

dBTO ~v=o

~Au+

is often

[2]. We present

of the oscillator

of the oscillator for

figure

the oscillator

of the pulling

the asymmetry

figures

changes

[1] or has been

account

behavior

the nonlinearity

the load

neglecting

for a small-load

account

rived.

with

figure.

by

RF

plane

here an exact

and

variation

by its pulling

calculated

variation

of load variation.

range

load admittance

length

1

YL at


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.