INTERVENTIONS
Envelope Composition
Envelope Composition Environment
Envelope Composition Environment Condition
Envelope Composition Environment Condition Treatment Approach
Envelope Composition Environment Condition Treatment Approach Design Intent
UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA Music Building 1892 UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO 1923-1928 PRINCETON UNIVERSITY Carl A. Fields Center 1895
UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA Music Building 1892
KEY CHARACTERISTICS Wood Sash Brick, Terra Cotta, Bluestone Slate and Copper Roof Wood Framing
existing brown
more recent pale grays and off-whites
later grays and dark greens
original red-brown
Music Building, North Elevation. Sample MUSI.N.4 removed from a window surround.
original red-brown
Music Building, West Elevation. Sample MUSI.W.11 removed from a porch column. BUILDING CONSERVATION ASSOCIATES INC
UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO 1923-1928
KEY CHARACTERISTICS Three construction Systems Guastavino Tile Steel Frame Masonry Bearing Walls Monumental Spaces 500 Windows
ŽŶĨĞƌĞŶĐĞ ͬ ^ĞŵŝŶĂƌ ͬ ůĂƐƐƌŽŽŵ ^ŚĂƌĞĚ WƌŽŐƌĂŵƐ &/ ĂŶĚ ĸůŝĂƚĞĚ WƌŽŐƌĂŵƐ ĐŽŶŽŵŝĐƐ ĂŶĚ hŶĚĞƌŐƌĂĚƵĂƚĞ WƌŽŐƌĂŵ KĸĐĞƐ 'ƌĂĚƵĂƚĞ ^ƚƵĚĞŶƚƐ ĂŶĚ ZĞƐĞĂƌĐŚ
FICE
EĞǁ DĞĐŚĂŶŝĐĂů ŝƌĐƵůĂƟŽŶ ZĞƐĞĂƌĐŚ ůƵƐƚĞƌƐ
dŚĞ ƉƌŽŐƌĂŵ ĂůůŽĐĂƚĞƐ ĮǀĞ ůĞǀĞůƐ ƚŽ ĨĂĐƵůƚLJ ĂŶĚ ƐƚƵĚĞŶƚ ƐƉĂĐĞƐ͕ ǁŝƚŚ Ă ŶĞǁ ĐůĂƐƐƌŽŽŵ ĂŶĚ ŶĞǁ ŵĞĐŚĂŶŝĐĂů ƐƉĂĐĞƐ ƐĞƚ ďĞůŽǁ ƚŚĞ ĨƌŽŶƚ ƚĞƌƌĂĐĞƐ͘
H A SE II NAR / CLASSROOM CONFERENCE / SEMI SHARED PROGRAMS BFI AND AFFILIATED
PROGRAMS
OFFICE RGRADUATE PROGRAM ECONOMICS AND UNDE AND GRADUATE STUDENTS
RESEARCH
NEW MECHANICAL CIRCULATION LTY RESEARCH AND FACU
dŚĞ ĂĚĚŝƟŽŶ ŝƐ ƉƌŽŐƌĂŵŵĞĚ ĨŽƌ ƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚ ĂŶĚ ĨĂĐƵůƚLJ ŽĸĐĞƐ͕ ŽŶ ƚŚƌĞĞ ůĞǀĞůƐ͕ ĐŽŶŶĞĐƚĞĚ ƚŽ ƚǁŽ ƌŽǁ ŚŽƵƐĞƐ ĂŶĚ ƚŚĞ ĨŽƌŵĞƌ ^ĞŵŝŶĂƌLJ͘ AnnBehaArchitects
AnnBehaArchitects
9
Properties of Window Options 2.5
2
1.5
1
0.5
0 Existing Window
Restored Frame with Vacuum Restored Frame with Interior Glass Storm Panel
Infiltration Test Result (cfm/ft2)
Winter Thermal Performance (U factor)
Full Replacement Vendor 1
Full Replacement Vendor 2
Summer Thermal Performance (Shading Coef)
Window Restoration Technical Comparison Updated 11/11/11
Approach
Detail
Existing Window
Leaded Glass
Frame
Crittall Detroit 1924
Restored 1 Frame with Vacuum Glass Restored Frame with 2 Interior Storm Panel Full 3 Replacement Vendor 1
Full 4 Replacement Vendor 2
Vendor
TBD
Summer Projected Cost Winter Thermal Savings for AHU‐ Infiltration Test* Thermal performanc E1 (Savings over result (cfm/ft2) performance e (Shading Existing (U‐factor) Coef) Windows)
2.42
1.35
0.926
‐
Restoration Works Inc.
Simulated leading over new glass panel. Leading is applied to one surface.
Original Frame.
0.13
0.6
0.75
10.3%
Restoration Works Inc.
Original Leading is Original Leading is restored. Glass has faceted appearance identical to original windows.
Original Frame.
0.01
0.8
0.5
11.1%
Hopes
Simulated leading on both surfaces of insulated glass.
Reduced sightlines. Frame is 1/2" wider than original.
0.02
0.41
0.3
17.9%
Crittall
Simulated leading.
Frame is the same size
0.70**
0.48
0.3
TBD**
PRINCETON UNIVERSITY Carl A. Fields Center 1895
KEY CHARACTERISTICS Three Coat Stucco Balloon Framing Fire and Pest Damage Wood Sash and Trim Missing Roof Structure Internal Drainage